COPA - Valoraciu00F3n del coste del material

Dear colleagues,
I am trying to bring some value fields COPA, the standard cost of material divided into subjects Pimas, Activities, etc. .. I performed the following parameterization, but only for testing raw materials:
+Record types+
       +Valuation strategies+
       +F I01 Actual valuation+
           +No. Valuation method                    CO-PA quantity       SD quantity          TP value field+
           +01   Material cost estimate              ABSMG                FKIMG+
               +Cost component structures+
               +01+
                   +Value field assignment1+
                       +VV020+
                           +001   Raw Materials+
But I managed to be assessed. Is it possible that you have to do some other Operation? In theory it should act to record a valuation COPA match with class of operation "F", right??
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Mary

Hi
I am not clear from what you have written
But, just making a wild guess.. I think you are asking that your valuation is not happening despite these steps
Did you assign your costing key to material types??
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Error in MIR7 - Different Material Vendor planned for del. costs item in PO

Dear All,
We getting error during MIR7.
We add two freight condtion ZFRO and ZFRT in purchase order as below :
ZFRO = we have add Rs. 350 against freight to Vendor(MATERIAL VENDOR)
ZFRT = We have add Rs. 100 for local freight which is paid to FREIGHT VENDOR directly (cash payment) i.e. paid for Transporter's Godown to our factory.
Now during MIGO, store department has enter as :
1. ZFRT (Freight Vendor - FREIGHT VENDOR)
2. ZFRO (Freight Vendor - MATERIAL VENDOR)
Now during MIR7 we are getting following error :
Different Material Vendor 300255 planned for del. costs item in PO 4500028018
(300255 is FREIGHT VENDOR which is at Number 1 in freight tab of MIGO)
Thanks and Regards,
Nirav

For good and service,
In MIR7, select the option Goods/Service Item
First do only for Good/Service item...
After that, in MIR7 select only Planned Delivery cost and give the same PO number..
Then you will receive a pop-up message to choose vendor..
Here select one vendor and press continue..
Then save you invoice..
And again do the same and just select the other vendor..
You can see 3 invoice number in PO history..
One for goods charges and another two for freight charges..

Tax calc. during invoice post - taking unplanned del cost into account

Hi all
Iam posting an invoice in Miro for a p.o
i have material cost,unplanned cost
Iam using a input Tax of 5% which should only take Material cost into
account while posting.
but in my case it is taking the unplanned del cost also for calculation
can you pl. let me know where the changes are to be made so that only material
cost is to be taken for tax calculation.
for eg
material cost -- 100
tax               -- 5.0%
unplanned del cost -- 10
so my inv. value should be -- 115.00
where as it is taking as -- 115.50.
regards
Prasanna

Hi srinivas
Thanks for your inputs
This is the present scenario.
We are distributing Unplanned del cost among the line items.
1. without having the Config made ( in OMR2)
We can still post the Invoices with Unplanned delivery cost
(without clicking the Calculate tax button )
by adding the
1. unplnd del cost in invoice details
2.clicking the Net proposal button on tax tab view
3. enter the total amt on basic data
4 when we are simulating we are getting
Warning message *********Twice ******
as Tax entered incorrect (code V4, amount 5.50), correct 6.05 eur
Message no. FF 707. and then we get the
5 We have to click the continue button twice
6 then we get the Invoice data view
7 when we click post , then again the
above warning message appears,
8 then we click continue button then it allows us to post.
correct me if the above process is wrong
My question :-
        1. is this the standard functionality when using unplanned delivery cost (without tax calculation )
       2. Can we apply some OSS so that this message appears only once.
Thanks
prasanna

Unplanned del cost vs price diff

hi,
may i know when to use unplanned del cost and when to post to price difference during invoice creation in miro?
assuming this is not unplanned cost for planned delivery cost (Indicator: Goods Items/Delivery Costs/Both) but this is goods/service item at the line item where with reference to PO.
so how do i know i need to post to unplanned delivery cost or price difference when there is a difference amount in invoice against PO.
thanks

When there is difference in unplanned delivery like some freight amount which was not there during the PO creation and GR but due to some reason u have to pay the freight amount to vendor. so his unplanned delivery cost. when u book unplanned delivery cost it is upto u to book the cost to some different gl or distribute the cost propstionatly to all the line item.
Price difference amount is posted first in case of MAP when there is not enough stock to load this amount. so then the cost is book to price difference account. when total stock to invoice is present in system then amount is loaded on material. In case of stanadrd price if the PO price is diffferent then difference in price is loaded in price difference account.

Unplanned Del Cost during MIRO - VAT gets recalculated.

Hello all

Scenario:
I have an invoice for procured items with VAT.
The unplanned del costs are configured to load onto material.
I enter the UDC (unplanned delivery costs) in the header and they get distributed proportionally among invoice items.
However my VAT value gets recalculated taking into account the UDC amount.
We now distribute the UDC manually among the items in the invoice in the Material tab. This way the VAT amount is not recaculated.
However this is a long process when the number of items in the invoice are large
and the UDC per item have to be calculated manually.
Requirement
I want to enter UDC in the header so that it distributes the amount among the items and not have VAT recalculated
Thank you
S Datar

Dear Satyajit,
This is standard functionality of SAP. The logic SAP follows as below:
(1) Unplanned delivery cost that needs to be posted during invoice verification gets apportioned to the base values of line items considered for invoice verification
(2) Since the Tax is always calculated on the base values of the line items, the tax also calculated on apportioned unplanned delivery cost.
(3) There are no Configuration or User exits available to avoid calculation of tax on unplanned delivery cost.
My workaround solutions / suggestions to meet your requirements of loading unplanned delivery costs to material value as below:
(1) Posting unplanned delivery costs directly to Material value. This is achieved by allowing direct posting to Article at MIRO.
(2) Post-unplanned delivery costs as subsequent debit memo using MIRO. Here, you can choose the relevant tax code based on the requirement
Hope this info will be useful.
Bye,
Muralidhara

Actual cost of material in COPA

Hi Team,
We have implemented PP, CO & COPA our client has the requirement to see the actual cost of material in COPA as per their requirement we designed the KE30 report as product wise profitability report in that report we used the record types B( direct postings from FI), C(Order settlement), D(over head cost) from the copa assessment cycle & F ( SD billing).
1) Is it possible to see the actual cost of material( Including activity cost) in copa.
2) If it is possible please advise.

Hello
It is not possible to get the actual cost of the material in COPA. Actual cost can only be derived if you implement material ledger.
However in COPA we may come close to actual cost to some extent. The following configuration needs to be done:
1. Run standard cost estimate every month so that the price reflects the most recent material prices.
2. Define assessment cycles for auxiliary cost centers (whose cost should form part of inventory cost) to production cost centers.
3. Configure for splitting and revaluation at actual price.
4. Take the production variances to COPA.
5. Create a report to show the standard cost and variances.
One of the difference is that the total standard cost is for the quantities sold during the period however the variances will be for the quantities produced during the period.
Another difference is that the unabsorbed overheads could not be allocated to individual materials.
Hope this helps.
Sangram

LIV-Planned Del.Cost for Multiple Purchase order.

Hi Gurus,
I have following issue while doing LIV -T-code MIRO . Passing Planned del. cost (Imports -Custom Duty) for Multiple POs (Same Vendor)
Checked following basics.
1.In Po Planned Del cost are maintained .(Custom Duty)
2.in MIRO -Selected Layout All information and Planned Del. cost
3.In Details tab Entered Doc. type RI (inv. receipt-IM) for imports.
4.Entered all mand. details like Amount ,currencey etc
1.Selected Layout All information and Planned Del. cost
2.Selected in Po reference Tab- Purchase order/Scheduling agreement and in more allocation area ,I am entering mulitple purchase order.(say 2 Pos)
When I adopt required 2 Po and line items to be settled r desplayed. and Again when I enter.Only One PO is displayed and other vansihes.
I need Both the PO (multiple PO).
Please help in resolving the issue.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Amar

Hi,
Yes, it is possible.
In MIRO, click on "More Allocation Criteria" button besides Purchase Order field
here go to search help of PO in the Pop-up screen and enter the vendor code and company code and execute
Now select the POs and click on "Copy" button and now click on "Adopt" button in the pop-up screen
It will copy all the POs and then follow the normal procedure of LIV.
Regards
Amar

Enter other cost in unplanned del cost in miro

hi,
may i know if i can enter unplanned cost other than delivery in unplanned del cost field?
if this field allowed me to enter other cost, what are the unplanned cost i can enter here?
thanks
rgds

hi,
Yes, you can enter any cost here other that the planned cost which you have not defined in the PO...
Example: Suppose you make the PO for vendor XYZ, in that PO suppose you put rates like 110 $, this may be of freight, customs etc...And later you come to know that you have pay little more for freight or customs like 115 $, then the difference of 5 $ you enter in the above given field in the MIRO...
Always remember, WHile you enter this in the MIRO, system keeps check of the tolerance check on this value as well...
If the doc is out of tolerance system will block the document..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Unplanned Del Cost

My system is calculating the unplanned delivery cost (Rs 10.00) with Tax( CST of 0.40 paise.) eg net unpl del cost is 10.40.
I want the system settings such that the uplanned del cost shall be 10.00 only
Regards
VS

Hi VS
In OMR2 assign tax code V0 (zero) for default value unplanned delivery costs
regards
Srinivas

Costing of Material without BOM & its Impact in COPA

Hello,
I have a scenario wherein Few Finished materials does not have BOM and Routing. However client is aware of Standard Price for these Materials. These materials are lying in stock since long but may get sold. Client is ready to update standard price by MR21 and would not mind to exclude these materials from costing run. However We have profitability analysis active, so as per my understanding while selling such parts for which system does not have costing run, it will give cost estimate error since no costing variant was used for price calculation of these materials.
Need your suggestions.
Regards,
Rahul

Hi….
You don’t use MR21 because SAP don’t create CO-PA
document without standard cost estimate of material which have
price control “S” when you create billing document .
To change material current stock’s amount, you can use MR21.
MR21 don’t have a role to release standard cost to material master.
For material which don’t have BOM and routing but have price control “S”
, you should calculate standard cost using t-code KKPAN to create billing
document without error related to standard cost.

How to distribute Unplanned cost on Material

Hi Gurus;
I want to distribute unplanned cost on material. In my case Material Vendor & Unplanned Cost (Freight) vendor are different. In PO there is no provision for unplanned cost and we have already booked the GRN.
I have seen blogs, and accordingly, first post the vendor invoice (For Material) and now when i go for subsequent debit for freight charges in MIRO - I don't know what to do. Since there is no pending material against the PO.
Please suggest the required steps.
Thanks in advance.
Devendra Singh Chauhan

Mr. Jürgen L.
During subsequent debit: In MIRO, AT BASIC DATA TAB: I Entered Invoice Date - 20.11.2010 & Posting Date 30.11.2010, Amount 500 USD, Tax (V0 - Exempted from Tax)., Reference (Document no of Invoice). Below that I selected On header I select "Purchase Order/Scheduling Agreement & Goods Received/Service Items", Enter the Purchase Order No.
Now on Payment tab - Entered BaselineDt-30.11.2010; System taking due on date automatically - 29.11.2010.
On detail tab: I entered Unpl. Del. Cst - 500 USD, change the invoice party - from original vendor to transporter vendor.
But situation is SAME.
Now, click on SIMULATE Button, I shows only Credit Amount:
Position-1: A/C type "A", Account - Freight Vendor Name; Amount: 500- USD.
At footer it shows: Debit: 0.00 Credit: 500.00 Balance: 500.00-
Where I am making a mistake.
DSC

KE4J -COPA error for costing key2

Hi,
We use common material type 'ZMAT' for normal Finished goods and configurable Finished material.
i created 2 costing keys and assigned respective costing variants in COPA as under
001 - zpc1 - Standard costing
002 - zpc2 - sales order costing - configurable material
Further i assigned in KE4J as under
10 F ZMAT 002 001
cost component split works fine for configurable material but for normal FG it encounters error message 'KE292'
however if set KE4J as
10 D ZMAT 001 002
then it works fine for normal material that is cost component split is derived properly and also no error occurs for configurable material but there is no cost component split for this material.
Is that something i am missing here. Also why system get hard stop in 1st case and doesn't look for costing key 2.
Regards,
At
Edited by: Mr. Atu on Jun 16, 2011 10:19 AM
Any suggestion - Ajay or professional collegue

Hi
It seems earlier the check box was ticked for "Issue error msg if no cost estimate found"... It was removed later on.. Is that so?
If you have created a SO / Billing doc when the tick was off, it cant give you the error message
I believe right sequence is 002 followed by 001...
In 002 - Tick the exclusive access.. DO NOT tick "Issue error message if not cost estimate found"
In 001 - Tick the :Issue error message if not cost estimate found
This should work in my opinion
Another option., You can also use KE4H and assign costing keys to Individual Material, if the no of mats are not much.... i.e. Say, For Configurable Material, you can assign costing keys to individual Products and for the rest of the materials use KE4J
Last option is to change the Mat Type of the configurable materials... For this, both the material types should be assigned to same valuation class so that you will be allowed to change in the Live System... In future, create all config materials under new material type
br, Ajay M

How to get report for cost estimates material cost only

Hi Gurus,
We have requirement in sales order costing that we need to develope report which shows only Material cost for all BOM levels.
Normally at lower levels cost of Material and activity cost will be treated as Material cost for next level. Here I want to consider only material cost not activity cost at lower levels
Pls suggest the logic and tables for exploding BOM and fetching material cost only.
Thanks
Sneha

Sneha
If you tick the "Roll up" indicatorfor each cost component in Cost Comp Str OKTZ, then overheads do not get added to the material cost... This is my understanding about it.. Is it behaving some thing different in your case??
br, Ajay M

Reducing the Freight cost on material value for undelivered material

Hi Experts,
Summary : The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material. The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded. The details scenario is mentioned below :-
We have to make a Purchase Order with material code say ABC for procured of some material. Suppose we make a Purchase Order for 100 nos. at a Unit Price of Say Rs. 10/- for Material Code ABC on say Vendor M/s XYZ. A freight condition is maintained in the Conditions Tab and suppose the Freight is Rs. 10 per unit of the material.
While preparing the Goods Receipt through MIGO, in the Freight Tab we select say freight vendor say M/s PQR against the freight condition and post the goods receipt.
While doing Invoice Processing in MIRO, when we enter the combination of Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost the system will populate the vendor codes of both the supplier of material and the transporter. On selecting the transporter the freight amount will populate against which the invoice of the tranporter can be processed.
In the Vendor Master of M/s XYZ GR-Based Invoice Verification is activated.
The vendor is allowed an under tolerance of 0.5% (i.e. the vendor should deliver at least 99.50 nos. of the Purchase Order). If the vendor delivers 99.50 or more then there will be no deduction in the freight charges.
But suppose the vendor delivers only 99.4 nos. of the quantity. Then we will prepare the GRIR for 99.4 nos.only. But while processing the MIRO we need to deduct 1.5 times the value of the material from the freight amount for the shortshipped quantity, i.e.
0.1 no (99.5 u2013 99.4) X Rs. 10/- * 1.5 = Rs. 1.5 are to be deducted from the final payment from the freight amount of the transporter.
The material supplier will have to be paid in full 100 nos. of quantity and will raise an invoice for 100 nos. A dummy GRIR for the 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will have to be prepared for processing the invoice for the 100 nos. of the material supplier and a dummy issue for 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will be prepared to remove them from the system.
Hence the freight cost for this 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will also go into the cost of the material and increase the MAP by that amount. Also the goods issue Cost will also have the effect of the freight cost.
We do not want to load the freight cost for the undelivered material in the value of the material.
Can any one please suggest a solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
AJ.

Hi
A PO Will be raised for full quantity of material say 100 nos.
The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material.
A freight vendor is maintained at the time of GR for material against the freight condition maintained in the Po.
The freight vendor facilitates the delivery of the material from the vendor to the purchaser for which he is given an under tolerance limit of 0.5%. Any delivery below this tolerance limit, freight amount to the effect of 1.5 times the per unit rate of material x short fall below 0.5% tolerance will be deducted from the freight amount.
A dummy grir will have to be prepared for the short delivered quantity for processing the invoice for the full quantity of the purchase order, as the vendor is going to raise the invoice for full purchase order quantity. The client does not want to load the freight cost of the undelivered quantity on the material value as it will wrongly show the MAP of the material. This shortshipped material will be issued to remove it from the system and the stock will remain for the delivered quantity only. The vendor is subject to gr based invoice verification.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks in advance.
AJ
The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded.

Cost of material charged to project but qty remains in stock

Dear Gurus,
I have a scenario, we have project systems PS. We have valuated projects and valuated project stock. Once project is over and if we have material left over, then my client want to charge the cost of the material to the project but he want to keep the stock at zero value in inventory, and issues it next time on zero value.
I have tried to transfer material using 415 Q, but system does not allow to transfer materaial from valuated project to non-valuated project.
kindly suggest any solution.

Dear,
my client wants to charge the leftover material cost to project but want to keep the qty in stock, so this is why we have a nonvalauted project. otherwise my client projects are valuated. i have not find any solution to charge the cost of material to project from project stock and keep the stock in inventory on zero value. and next time when this leftover is issued it will be issued on zero value.
hope u have a solution.
Edited by: Johi Kapoor on Nov 10, 2011 11:57 AM

COPA - Valoraciu00F3n del coste del material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for