Cost Center Assessment to COPA

Hi,
I have done Cost Center assessment to characteristics "Company Code" and "Product". System has even generated COPA documnet for costing based profitability analysis.
However, in report developed through Report Painter(KE32), the value field for which the assessment got posted is not getting displayed.
Can any one guide in this regard.
Thanks in advance
Sudhakar

Hi Sudhakar,
When you do the cost center assessment in COPA, you have given 2 characteristicsi.e product , company code and thru one value field.
When designing report in ke32 (report) and form ke35(form), we will give certain characteristics, so check what are the parameters has been given in the report, bcz values flown thru copa assessment will be available only in compaby code and product not for any other characteristics. I guess you have characteristics in report other than these two.
I hope this clarifies.
Regards
Rajesh A

Similar Messages

Concept of CO- PA cost center assessment

Hi Experts,
I would like to ask if you could supply me with more info about the concept of cost center cost assessment in COPA. Is this a standard procedure that must done? I am having my 1st SAP implem. and have been preparing too hard to get much info. as I can take about COPA. I have understanding about value fields an characteristics BUT I am having a hard time to understand cost center allo. and why do is there a need to do it (or maybe not). Aren't they supposed to be an automatic process (distribution of figures to COPA reports)? Thanks and I would understand if the question may sound a little unclear.

Hi,
The cost center assessment to copa comes in places only for allocating the common costs.
Generally, we do allocate the common costs from the common cost center to the respective user cost centers in the overhead accounting.
If the need is to recognise the common overheads directly in COPA, then instead of reallocating the costs with in cost center accounting, we directly transfer the costs to copa thru costcenter assessment to copa.
Regards
Sudhakar Reddy

Error in cost center assessment integration with FI

We just upgraded our test system with support pack SAPKH50020 and when we test cost center assessment, we are getting the error message "For document type SA, an entry is required in field Reference"
The same process is working in our production system, which is under support pack SAPKH50010. We are using the same doc type, and the configuration for this doc type is the same as in our test system.
OSS told us that the only solution is to change the doc type configuration or use a user exit to populate the Reference field.    However, I don't understand why this process is working in the old support pack and not in the new one.
Has anybody encountered the same issue? If so, how was it resolved?
thank you,
Lanny

Hi Phaneendra,
Thank you for your response. But the real question is why is this process different between support pack SAPKH50010 and SAPKH50020.   In support pack SAPKH50010, we also uses document type SA with reference field required, but the cost center assessment is able to post to it without any customization.    Now, in support pack SAPKH50020, this no longer works.    So I'm just wondering if any of you have encountered similar issue after upgrading the support pack.
thanks
Lanny

Table where cost center assessment cycle details are saved

Hi,
Can anybody tell me what is the table where Cost center assessment cycle details like sender cost center,receiver cost center, assessment cost element, SKF etc... are saved?
Regds,
Bijay

Hi,
Look at the T81* tables.
Regards,
Eli

Transfer between cost center and to copa

Dear Forum,
I have 3 points to clarify.
1) Assessment or distribution, sender cost center is credited and receiver cost center will be debited. cost in sender will reduce and receiver will increase. correct?
2) For keu3 where cost center to copa, will cost in cost center reduce when transfer to cops?
3) For keu3, how is the double entry like with the use of assessment cost element when transfer to copa?
Thanks

HI,
when defining an aassessment cycle within T-Code KEU5 the sender is cost center / cost element (or a group of them), the receiver is always a combination of CO-PA characteristics that you define within the segment definition.
This characteristics combination + some technical infos are stored with the key PAOBJNR (profitabilty analysis object number).
SO the cost center is credited and the CO-PA receiver (a PAOBJNR) is debited during assessment execution.
Best regards, Christian

MMPV - is Cost center assessment possible after closing period in MMPV?

Hi,
We are performing MMPV for April, which will close automatically postings for February. As far as I know MMPV opens and closes periods for MM postings only. Is that true?
I would like to perform Cost center assesment and CC assessment to COPA for february after I run MMPV. Will the system allow me to do that or due to the fact that february is closed in MM it won't be possible.
Thanks for your help,
Regards,
Karol

Hi
What you feel is right as MMPV related to close the period for material document positing . To run the assessment cycle (KSU5) Co and Fi periods are required to be kept open.
If the answer is helpful kindly assign points
Thanks & Regards
Mahesh

Effect of Cost Center Distribution in COPA

Hi,
We are running the cost center distribution to transfer the cost from one cost center to another cost center.It is creating the controlling document but in COPA reports the cost is not getting transfered from one cost center to another. How can we transfer the cost from one cost center to another with the subsequent effect in COPA.
Thanks
Ariel

Hi Ariel,
when you refer to the cost center in COPA, are you talking about the field "sender cost center"?
That field shows the costs center that the costs came from when they were transferred from cost center to COPA through an assessment cycle (KEU5). When you transfer costs from one cost center to another AFTER running the assessment cycles in KEU5, then that transfer cannot have any effect on COPA. You would have to first transfer from one cost center to the other and THEN run the COPA assessment in KEU5.
I hope I have understood your question correctly
Nikolas

Consumption of FG to Cost Center flow to COPA

Hi,
We have ML in system.
Users are consuming some FG to Cost Center through MB11 and lets say 711 movement type. So this generates ML documents.
Now question is how can I can see this data in COPA?
When we do Periodic Revaluation in COPA through KE27, only those values that has been sold are only revaluated with PUP price. So that we can see that in Actual COGS value field.
But what about those consumption that occurred in cost center?? How will I reconcile those figure in COPA?
To give more information:
We are running CKMLCP. We do Revaluation of Consumption step.
But in post closing step we are not selecting Revaluation of Consumption check box.
I am finding it very hard to reconcile COPA value and FI doc.
Kindly help.
regards
Kami

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for valuable input.
I also thought in the same line , but user has the following concern on this:
Assessment Cycle: As per Users, it cannot be used because this will allocate based on allocation basis. But they need, the values that was posted at the time of transaction and as per materials. So it wont be accurate through Assessment cycle,
OKB9: They have different Cost center for different valuation area for the same GL Account.
Hence through OKB9 also, we cannot post directly to COPA.
That's the reason the above option were not adopted.
My other concern to this is:
In CKM3, we have two lines under consumption, one for Normal sales PGI and other is Cost Center.
After doing revaluation of consumption in CKMLCP, we see one line under Cost Center :Revaluation of Consumption Figure"
My question, where can I see that figure whether in any table or in Cost Center report??
If that is also available we can try to match those values and post to COPA.
Let me know your thought on this.
Thanks and regards
Kami

Cost center assessment in new GL and classic GL

HI ALL
I want to double check one thing. When you run cost center assessments in classic GL, the system will make entries in GLPCT table for PCA with assessment cost element. But when you got migrated into NEW GL then system will not make any entry in FAGLFLEXT table with assessment cost element. These assesments have no effect on PCA module. If I want to reflect the effect of costcenter assesments in PCA in new GL , where can I check for that?....Is there anyway to acheive this without activating both classic and new gl PCA?
Thanks
Steve

Hi,
If you have defined variant for real time integration and it has "Cross profit center" checked and this variant is assigned to company code, then FI-CO reconcilation posting will be posted in each of the profit center.
One can have a single account for all reconcilation posting or different FI-CO recon account can be used for each bussiness process / for each assessement cost element using substitution.
FI-CO reco account is visible in the FAGLFLEXT and hence can be displayed in report.
Regards
Chetan.

Cost Center Assessment - cost element type 42

Hi dear All,
I got issues running KSU5 to allocate planned costs under cost element type 42. we were expecting that all planned costs (primary and secondary(cost element type 42)) could be allocated by credit cost center (actual). only primary costs are being allocated.
Scenario:
cost center planning (kp06) 1000 currencies in primary cost element in cost center A
running planning assessment - KSUB: cycle uses assessment cost element (type 42): sender cost center A, receiver cost center B (all planned values). assessment cyles posts 1000 currencies from CC A to cost center B
planning in cost center B (primary cost elements through kp06, 500 currencies) total planning 1000 from previous assessment with CE type 42, and 500 from cc planning in a primari CE.
by the period end closing, tcode KSU5 (allocation actual) is running. new cycle created, based on planned values (origini not actual, but planned amounts).
we were expecting to allocate 1500 currencies from cost center B to cost center C (using 100% and through assessment cost element)).
result: credit actual cost center B = 500 currencies debit actual cost center C = 500 currencies.
1000 currencies pending on cost center B (planned).
do you know why SAP is not allocating the 1000? even if those 1000 were planned in cost center B by assessement, a new allocation cycle should be able to post them or not?
thank you for your outcome.

Hi dear Ajay, thank you for your answer.
first, I understand the difference between KSUB and KSU5, in the defined scenario, we have both. planned values, become actual with the MEC activities. business definition.
regarding the cycle, I have setup assessment cost element so we can get all planned lines posted as 1.
On sender tab I have only the cost center. no cost element defined.
receiver its cost center.
furthermore, i've not setup allocation structure, so all cost elements should be allow, there is no restriction on this.
the only difference is: planned costs which their origin is already an assessment are not being assessed again.
I can show you the print screens with cycles setup if it helps
best regards
MF

Need to take cost center assessment cost to product

Dear All,
We have product costing activated in our system. We are taking Raw material , packing material cost from Material master. where as activity cost based on different activity type defined on relevant work center / resource based on certain formula.
Now for some other expenses like power / utility cost, we have created assessment cycle, through which we assess the cost to relevant cost centers based on certain base (SKF).
Now our business requires this cost to load on product cost which is laid on cost centers through assessment.
Pls suggest the way to achieve the same through product costing.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

Dear Ajay,
Thanks for reply.
As per my understanding below mentioned points I need to consider for costs which is coming on cost center through assessment (based on SKF) as I want to take them to my product :
I need to create seperate activity types for those expenses which I want to take onto my product.
I need to assign them onto my work center / resource.
I need to create a Splitting Structure in OKES and assign respective secondary cost element to the relevant above newly created activity type.... With this, the amount in secondary cost ele would be divided by the relevant activity type ONLY
(Choose splitting rule/method as "!2" i.e. Activity Qty in OKES)
I need to assign my production cost centers (through which I want to transfer cost to my product) to this splitting structure in OKEW.
I need to map sec. cost ele. of above created act. type to co. comp structure.
Suppose I have one power plant at my plant campus. I am distributing this power cost to my 4 different plant (existed on campus) on their respective cost centers Ctr1, ctr2, ctr3, ctr4.
Now as per above understanding when I can see this newly created activity cost to my product cost?
For that I need to assess power cost to all 4 plants and then running my product cost with these newly created activity types?
Pls correct me in my understanding.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

Cost Center Assessment to G/L

Hi Gurus,
Is there any easy way of Assessing Cost Center balance to Balance Sheet account? We're in 4.6C I don't see G/L account as receiver in my Assessment cycle segment? I know we can assess C.Ctr to Internal Order which can settle to B/S account or do it manually but I'm wondering if there is any easy way? Any help would be rewarded appropriately!
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
No it is not possible to transfer to GL Account from Cost Center. Assessment functionality is with in CO Module. In Internal Orders it is settlement and in Settlement Profile we can have GL Account as a receiver.
I am wondering what is the Business requirement for assessing it to GL Account?
Thanks
Murali.

Cost Center Assessment to Cost Hierarchy based on Actual Consumption error

Assessment is set up:
SENDER: Cost Center: Overhead Expenses (values in expense accounts)
RECEIVER: Top Node of Cost Object Hierarchy (material consumption has been posted to two objects - related account has value and quantity fields)
Segment is set up:
Sender Rules: Posted Amounts
Share:100%
Actual value origin
Receiving tracing factor:
Receiver rule: Variable Portions
Var. portion type: Actual Consumption
No Scaling
Assumption is that "Var. portion type: Actual Consumptions" means the quantity in the consumption account on the receiver from the inventory posting. Is this true?
Edited by: Chris Gibson on Apr 13, 2010 11:56 PM

Hi dear Ajay, thank you for your answer.
first, I understand the difference between KSUB and KSU5, in the defined scenario, we have both. planned values, become actual with the MEC activities. business definition.
regarding the cycle, I have setup assessment cost element so we can get all planned lines posted as 1.
On sender tab I have only the cost center. no cost element defined.
receiver its cost center.
furthermore, i've not setup allocation structure, so all cost elements should be allow, there is no restriction on this.
the only difference is: planned costs which their origin is already an assessment are not being assessed again.
I can show you the print screens with cycles setup if it helps
best regards
MF

Cost center assessment

Gurus,
please clariffy.. Urgent
When I am creating assessment cycles, if I add ( in segments) senders are Cost elements and cost centers together what is going to happen? How the cost is going to be distributed? After running assessments, how do I check the values and how do I differentiate them whether they are from cost centers or from elements?
if I give combination of both cost elements and cost centers, what is the relationship should exist between them ?
regards
kumar

Hi
Cost Centers are the cost collectors and cost elements are the cost carriers.
When you add cost elements and cost centers as senders you define that the cost that are available in the cost centers are carried to other cost objects via the cost elements.
Hope it helps
Good Luck
Hari

Cost center assessment to CO-PA using Variable portions in receiver rule

Hi Experts,
Could you please explain how to use variable portions as receiver rule. An example will be very helpful. I have got theory in help documents but could not get
through it....request for an example.
I am using fixed amounts as sender values and using variable portions as receiver rule.
In receiver tracing factor - I am using value field / key fields as say example VV075 (actual cash discount). I also mentioned record type and plan/actual indicator
in receiver tracing factor screen. I also mentioned data in receiver weighting factor screen.
Still if I execute KEU5, system says no receivers found.
I checked and found there are values for VV075 for the record type and plan / actual indicator combination selected.
Where could be the problem.
Request to explain variable portions with example.
Thanks in advance.
DSK

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
There is no error in other segments. I already checked it...and also in KE24 there is data for the combination of value field, record type, plan/actual indicator and period selected. That is not an issue.
I feel some set up in using the variable portions is missing. This is the first time using variable portions.
Thanks.

Cost Center Assessment to COPA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for