Cost stp for etherchannel
Hi All,
I have a doubt and problem is that I found different and different point of view with regard to this topic so I am not sure which is correct.
I have a port channel bundled with two 1Gbps fastethernet.
Stp cost of the port channel is 3.
If I add a new 1Gbps interface, will the cost change?
Thanks.
Hi,
For a 10Gb/s I have a STP of 1 here.
I think this was the cost for all speeds >= 1 Gbps in the original 802.1D standard.
With 802.1D-1998 the cost for 10 Gbps was defined as 2 and in 802.1D-2004 as 2.000.
I am testing on a real machine here.
What kind of machine is that? (already answered while I was typing)
Regards
Rolf
[EDIT] :
Just for the sake of knowledge:
With the 2004 Edition of the standard, the BPDU cost field was doubled from 16 to 32 bit and so the recommended values could also be increased remarkably.
It seems that recent IOS-version still use the 16 bit pathcost values in PVST and rapid-PVST modes by default, so there is little scope left for link speeds >1Gbps (4) and <10Gbps (2). So with the 16 bit pathcost we can assume that the default ST cost for all Ethercannels from 2 to 8 Gbps is 3.
Running PVST or rapid-PVST, you can change this by the global spanning-tree pathcost method long command; whereas MST seems to use the long pathcost by default.
So Peter is of course right, provided that the long format was used.
Similar Messages
-
Standard Cost Estimate for Subcontracting
Dear Sir / Madam,
We are in the process of migrating from our normal R/3 operations for Production Planning to Execution inclusive of Costing of materials by using iPPE functionality for repetitive scenario. We have our BOMs for painted body currently in R/3. The painted body falls under subcontracting scenario.
In this scenario the body in white produced from our bodyshop is sent out to the subcontractor along with certain paint items and is received as painted body and consumption of the body in white and the paint items sent needs to be shown during the goods receipt of painted body.
For this we have maintained the BOM for the painted body in iPPE. Also in the costing variant "ZD01" in order to arrive at Standard cost (CK11N) for the painted body we have maintained the following settings for Valuation variant for subcontracting :
Priority Strategy Sequence
1 Net Quotation Price
2 Effective Price from Purchase Order
While running CK11N for the material (painted body) we are receiving the following message
Message no. 28501 : Error in dependency processing: condition 0000062388 is empty
We wanted to verify whether the message raised is normal or would it have any adverse impact.
Your assistance would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Bhavika
Edited by: Bhavika Goyal on Feb 7, 2009 12:20 PMDear All,
Control Key is important for inhouse producrtion and Sub Contract. Check it once and when ever u have given the Product (semi fisished) to Sub Contractor, along with Paint.
Here one thing is important what is your process? how much portionis involced in Sub contracting. why because
Paint issue to the sub con is captured by the way for migo or miro
Payment to sub contract is capture all the cost of the Sub Con., then is there any cost is missed for this process. Let me know the remain things?
thanqu
raj -
Error reading material cost estimate for sales order (KE292)
Dear All,
I have an issue with billing. we are posting july month transactions, the material cost is maintained through MR21. When releasing billing document for accounting we are getting error message like"Error reading the material cost estimate for sales order "11"
Message no. KE292
Diagnosis
In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate item 000010 of sales order 11 by reading the corresponding product cost estimate.
However, no product cost estimate could be found for this sales order item.
The system accessed product costing for product AMLFP011011XX00P using costing key YB3 as defined in the
CO-PA Customizing settings.
System Response
The system cannot process the document any further.
Procedure
Check your Customizing settings."
We cross checked with other client as a current date and we ran cost estimate through CK40N with same material. and we posted entries. Here it is working fine. but in above process it is not working. Can you pls guide me where i missed.
Regards,
Nagaraju,Hi,
When the Costing Key is assigned to the material types in the COPA customizing, then system expects Cost estimation when billing is released to Accounts.
If you dont run cost estimation but update the material master through MR21, system will not accept as in the Costing key configuration you must have selected the Current Standard price field for the valuation.
Hence, try to run cost estimation and then do releasing.
Thanks & Regards
Ravi Kumar -
Two Cost Element for the same GL
Hi,
We have 2 Company Codes - 1000 & 2000. We are using same CoA in both the Company Codes. We have a GL, say 12345678 for posting short/excess amount. So during MIRO, the accounting entry would be:
GR/IR a/c dr. 10,000
GL 12345678 2
Vendor 10,002
GL 12345678 would be dr or Cr would depend on short/excess amount.
We have created Cost Element for this GL 12345678. If I post the MIRO without attaching a Cost Center to this Cost Element system thows an error to attach the Cost Center. I have separate Cost Center for Company Codes 1000 & 2000 however I can only put one Cost Center in this Cost Element.
Can anyone advice how can I post the above mentioned entry with different Cost Center. This line item (GL 12345678) is generated automatically and the Cost Center field is greyed out hence I don't have option to enter the Cost Center during MIRO. I checked the FSG of this GL, Cost Center field is 'Optional' over there.
Thanks,
SandySolution Option* -You can assign Differant Cost Centers to Company Code 1000 and Company Code 2000 in OKB9 Transaction Code.Follow the below process....
--- Go to OKB9
--- Select New Entries button
--- Give the Company Code 1000 in first row and 2000 in 2nd row
--- Enter the Cost element 12345678 for company code 1000 and 2000
--- Enter the relevent cost centers for company code 1000 and 2000
--- Select Save
Thanks
Fit 4 Nothing -
How to maintain One product cost collector for multiple materials and configuration setting
Hi experts,
my requirement is that i want to maintain one product cost collector for multiple materials ans also i want to know the configuration setting for the same.
I have used KKF6N but it is not working in my case. I went through KKF6M also but there i found multiple cost collectors.
please guide me in the same.
Thanks in advance.Hi Shripad,
you cannot assign same Product cost collector to different material.
Because you creating cost collector for material combination of material /production version,material /Bom Routing.
so please create individual cost collector for every material.
if you have any query kindly revert back.
Please mark the answer as helpful if it is helpful to you.
Because march 5 onwards scn has stopped awarding points to liked content.
Starting now: No more points for likes on comments/replies
Thanks & Regards
Sandeep Kumar Praharaj -
Account 'Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects' could not be found for
Hi All,
I am facing one error massage at the time of CWIP Asset settled in Cost centre
Account 'Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects' could not be found for area 01
Message no. AU133
Which G/L Account (cost element) we have to assing there in Account determinati A090.
What is empact this our G/L Account.
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
juhisHi AP,
Thanks for your reply,
We find one element there assgin but that is not a G/L account what we do we can assgin that element in the Account determination in that asset account determination OR we have to create new G/L Account.
When we create new G/L Account in which Account head we have to create and what is impact that g/l account in our Balance sheet account.
Please help me ot understand that Process.
Edited by: juhis022 on Mar 2, 2012 10:15 AM -
Account 'Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects' could not be found for a
Hi All,
we are facing one error massage at the time of settlment KO88.
Account 'Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects' could not be found for area 01
Message no. AU133
Diagnosis
When creating the accounting document, the system could not find account 'Cost elem. for settlmt AuC to CO objects' in depreciation area 01 for company code CSEB.
Procedure
Enter this account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
Thanks & Regards,
juhiHi Juhi...
Please check the below procedure....
If you are using the Internal order process, then
KO01 - IO Creation
ME21N - PO creation with IO as Account assignement
MIGO
MIRO
1. IO to AUC Settlement
Define the Settlement Rule iin IO - KO02 (AUC Asset)
KO88
Settlement type is "Automatic"
For Cost analysis....you can refer to KOB1 or KO03 -> EXtras -> Cost Analysis
2. AUC to Fixed Asset or Cost Center
KO02 - Settlement Rule - Cost center or Fixed Asset
KO88
"Full Settlement"
If the process is
AIAB and AIBU
Refer to
AW01N
Hope it gives some idea
Thanks -
Can anybody tell me how to extract sales value and cost value for an materi
dear all,
Can anybody tell me how to extract sales value and cost value for an material sold .
All the values of cost value and sale values are getting stored in bseg-wrbtr field .
How to identify them uniquely.
Or there is another way to find the sale and cost values.
Regards
MaveHi Mave!
Normally there is no condition change, when something is sold.
But sales price depends on sales conditions (not only price, but also surcharges, discounts, taxes - if customized).
Nevertheless, after selling you have a invoice document, where correct values <i>should</i> be stored (see VBRP fields mentioned above). If here is a problem, then customizing of price determination is in question, not a programming of user-exits with MARD selection for costs (or some other tries to get a price).
When you specify your requirements more in detail, you might get better answers - but currently only general hints are possible ('see in invioce / G/L accounts').
Regards,
Christian -
Control G/L account and Cost Center for movement type 251
Dear Friends,
I would like to use mov. type 251 for GI for sale and like to control over G/L account and Cost center.
The G/L account is by default from the valuation class of the the material and if the user will enter wrong G/L
we had done the customising in OMJJ movement type 251 - Account grouping - Unchecked the check box of column
"Check account assignment" - Impact is " the system always uses the G/L accounts or account assignments determined automatically"
I also made default cost center for G/L account and plant wise through OKB9.
Now I would like to suppress/dispaly the G/L account and cost center - for same I had done Setting in Entry control menu of OMJJ for 251 of field Account control - Value - "-" field is suppressed. But it is not working.
Please advise to solve this situation.
Thanks & Regards
RajanDear Rajan
Yes, I have checked in MB1A earlier. We have separate node for Field seletion layout for Enjoy transaction MIGO for mvt type in which the G/L account (KONTO) an Cost center (KOSTL) have only optional or required entry selection.
warm regards
Ramakrishna. -
Creation of multiple cost center for one emplyee
HI All,
I have requirement . one emplyee is working two projects so need create two cost centers for one employee.
please tell me how create multiple cost center for one employee.
Thanks&Regards
rameshhai.
if he works half the time... u can give 50%.. or just get it confirmed from core team member..
manu -
Cost update for third party and individual purchase orders
Hi,
We went live in around 5 months back. Last month we changed the configuration so that costs for back 2 back purhcase order will be determined from goods receipt & third party purchase orders could be determined from logistics invoice verification. This is working correctly with the new documents which are being created.
We have an issue with the document which are already created and posted. We want to update these existing billing documents so that they can pick the rigth cost. For these old transactions currently the cost is being picked from valuation segment of the material.
I have tried resolving this through reorganization of infostructures & through sdvprsupdate but it does not work.
Best Regards
nHi,
We went live in around 5 months back. Last month we changed the configuration so that costs for back 2 back purhcase order will be determined from goods receipt & third party purchase orders could be determined from logistics invoice verification. This is working correctly with the new documents which are being created.
We have an issue with the document which are already created and posted. We want to update these existing billing documents so that they can pick the rigth cost. For these old transactions currently the cost is being picked from valuation segment of the material.
I have tried resolving this through reorganization of infostructures & through sdvprsupdate but it does not work.
Best Regards
n -
My iphone 4s fell from the bed and the front screen glass got cracked but the touch screen is working fine, so can i replace just that screen glass?? If not what am i to do ? And how much it might cost me for that repairing??
I don't know. You'll have to ask.
FYI, if the phone was not originally sold in India, it can not be serviced in India. You will have to take it back to the country where it originated. -
Different Cost Centers for Different Line Items in a single Reservation
Hello Gurus,
When we create a Material Reservation, we give the cost center at the header level and that cost center is accounted for each of the line items in the reservation. But when the reservation has many line items which depend on different cost centers, there is a need to enter different cost centers for different line items in the same Material Reservation. How can this be done? Please suggest.Hi,
It's a standard restriction in SAP functionality where one reservation document can only accommodate one cost center.
You can not maintain multiple cost centres for individual line items.
You have to create seperate Reservations for each cost centre.
check below thread:
ONE RESERVATION FOR DIFF COST CENTERS
Umakanth R
Edited by: Umakanth R on Dec 8, 2011 7:53 AM -
No costs visible for statistical WBS element
Hi,
The followin steps are the setup:
- Project with a statistical WBS element and a network below
- Create a PO with Account category "Fixed Asset"
- Fill in a fixed asset, but also a (statistical) WBS element (put field 'project' optional in customizing)
- execute a MIGO to book costs
Now when I run the cost report for this project using transaction CJI3 then I do NOT get the costs visible on this statistical WBS element.
HOWEVER when I do the same steps, but instead of putting a statistical WBS element I put the network (next to the fixed asset) then I do get the costs visible.
Is this normal or do I have to change something in order to get the costs visible for my statistical WBS element?
kindest regards
bertIs this necessary?
Because in the end I want to book these costs as actual costs on my fixed asset... -
How to get Cost element for a component in co03 cost analysis report
Hi,
I'm using table COSP to find the quantity for a production order component. However, I need to identify the cost element first to get the unique data. In CO03 cost analysis report, there is cost element for the component. Does anyone know how to get it ?
Thanks.CSKA stores the basic info about the cost element
There is no data in CSKB.
I'm trying to use different tables to get the cost element.
AUFK, AFKO, AFPO, RESB, ...but no luck...
Maybe you are looking for
-
Conflict with Third Party Apps?
I am getting an occasional error saying there is a possible conflict with third party apps and that I need to check the drivers of my MIDI devices to see if they are up to date? Sorry but I did not record the exact wording. Does anyone know what this
-
I have also uninstalled and reinstalled Firefox. My Google homepage says the current version is out of date and two other websites say it is out of date even though I know it has been updated.
-
Hello! I have 3 gauge graphs (for 3 measures), and in legend (gauge titles) I show actual values. With View selector user can ''jump'' between these gauge graphs, but unfortunately, the title values (variables, like @1, @4) keep always the value of t
-
MR51 - Accounting & Material Doc
Dear All I want to enhancement of Mr51 for MIIGO & MIRO doc no correspondance with Accounting doc. Please advise. WBR Avijit
-
I am looking on Adobe's site trying to find a PDF of a printed piece I picked up at an Adobe Event in Austin Tx so I can share it with my enterprise IT department in my quest to convince them to allow CC at my company. The piece is titled "Top 5 reas