Delivery Cost not to be inventorised

Dear all,
I need your advise in our business scenario.
Basic Price = 100.00
Customs duty = 10.00
I dont want to inventorise the customs duty to the material cost but required as a separate entry like below:
Inventory account Dr. 100.00
Customs duty Dr. 10.00
GR/IR clearing a/c Cr. 110.00
Because the imported materials are exported within 180 days. Initially we pay the customs as deposit not as a duty. If we are unable to export within 180 days then the deposit amount should get transferred to Customs duty account and to be inventorised to the material account.
Please advise.
Regards,
S.Suresh

Hi Suresh,
For this you define respecive custom duty condition type as accrual in customizing and condition type as delivery cost then after in pricing procedure mentin your defined account keys against custom duty condition type.
Hope it will solve your problem
Regards
VS

Similar Messages

Negative delivery costs not allowed

Hi Experts,
In the below situation I am getting message like 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'.Please
give your suggestions.
There is a PO line item which I want to check the 'Delivery completion indicator' But when I am
going to change mode of the PO, in that line item delivery costs are coming in negative & samething
is shown in PO header condition tab as well.
So system throws message that ' PO Header still faulty'. 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'.
Please suggest how to overcome this problem.
Regards,
Partha

Hi,
PLease check which condition is causing this error and change "rounding rule" to B. If this does not solve the error, I would recommend that you open a ticket at SAP.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Delivery costs not reversed in GR reversal

Hi,
I have a situation where in PO following conditions are used-
ZR0 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type
ZR2 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - Delivery cost - (100% of ZR0)
ZR3 - (-100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - (-100% of ZR0)
When I post the GR, the following entries are posted-
148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   30,421.60 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68- AUD
629935    Std-Actual Price Var   34,570.08 AUD
611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68 AUD
611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68- AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR0)
120240    CARecv Sundry-Extern   14,504.64 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64 AUD (ZR2)
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR3)
But when I reverse the GR, the following entries only are posted-
99 148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   32,653.56- AUD
86 311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68 AUD
96 629935    Std-Actual Price Var   32,338.12- AUD
50 611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68- AUD
40 611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68 AUD
Can you please let me know why the ZR0/ZR2/ZR3 cond are not reversed in the 102 movement?

Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00
002 96       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81-
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             548.57
004 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00-
005 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                               893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   USD
001 99       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00-
002 86       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             345.19
004 40       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R.

Delivery cost not created during GRN of PO using BAPI

I have a customized program which use BAPI - BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create PO, PO was created successully.
then program will use BAPI - BAPI_PO_CHANGE to update condition pricing, which is also executed succesfully. all condition pricing (KONV) updated correctly.
Lastly, the program will use BAPI - BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create GRN and update delivery cost. However in my case, the delivery cost is not update, EKBZ table record is not created, as well as GRN item line table MSEG table is not updated with delivery cost.
Anyone face this type of problem before?What is the possible causes?
Any help and suggestion is greatly appreciated.

Lai,
you should try asking this on ABAP forum thread. You will get a response. May be there is another BAPI u should use or may be you the usage of BAPI is incomplete. Pl confirm with ABAP forum.
Rgds

UNPLANNED DELIVERY COST NOT PROPERLY DISTRIBUTED TO MATERIAL LINE ITEM

Hi ,
Presently my system is Configured to distribute Unplanned Delivery Costs among invoice items,but it is not properly distributed among line item while doing the posting.
What may be the problem,Is there any additional settings to be checked ?or in which areas i need to check? Plz Help regarding this.
Thanks,
Raju

Hi,
Plz chek the SPRO settings for unplanned delivery cost. You need to maintain the company code
in SPRO - Material Management - Logistics Invoice Verification -Incoming invoices - Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
regards

GR based IV for delivery costs not working

Hi Gurus,
GR based IV is not working for certain delivery costs. I have not assigned any accrual key to the condition type in the calculation schema.
When I try to perform invoice verification for the delivery cost, the GR quantity / value does not appear automatically.
Is there anything I need to do with the schema / condition type?
Regards,
Aroop

Hi Kumar,
I had missed out the Vendor in GR option 2 in the condition type configuration: I changed it to 2, but the problem remains.
During PO creation, the vendor gets mentioned against the condition type automatically.
Any further idea on this?
Regards,
Aroop

Planned delivery cost not updating Through Invoic02 idoc

Hi,
We are using Inbound IDOC (INVOIC02) to create invoice. The enhancement that we are looking to do is to use the indicator Goods/Service items + planned delivery costs which is seen when we manually post invoices using MIRO. Can you please let us know of any inputs in this regard.
For your information - the current functional module we are using to post invoices received through EDI is IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM and the message type is INVOIC. But this does not seem to help us in case of goods which has got a planned freight attached to it.
Thanks
Shasi

Hi Experts ,
Kaindly provide me your inputs ..
Thanks
Shasi

Delivery costs not reversed (MIGO - 102)

Dear all,
I need to cancel a material document (101) of which the freight costs correctly posted (101), with 2 different condition types and a different vendor for each of them.
Now with MIGO (102), I am able to reverse the freight costs for the first condition type, but not the second one. Both condition types have a very similar setup in the customizing and I do not understand why one of the freight amounts does not get reversed in MIGO (neither in MBST) whereas it was correctly posted with 101.
Any ideas?
Annabelle R.

Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00
002 96       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81-
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             548.57
004 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00-
005 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                               893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   USD
001 99       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00-
002 86       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             345.19
004 40       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R.

Question on unplanned delivery costs need to go to GL account ????

Hello
I have a question regarding unplanned deliver costs. I am a FI analyst Can you please explain my how I can solve my problem . My user wants unplanned delivery costs to go in to the GL account .
In MM account determination GL account is set up but when I am doing MIRO
. I am putting total amount in amount field and freight costs in unplanned field under detail section.
When I simulate it gives me tax code related warning when I hit enter it credit vendor and debits GR/IR clearing and some debit to inventory account but not to freight account,
Whats the problem. Can someone explain me :
1)     What do I need to do to make it go to GL account ( account is set up but what is tax code related error . how do I fix that,
2)     How does unplanned delivery costs work if I have tax, discount and freight.
3)     Is tax calculated off total amount (inventory + freight) and discount too. How can I prevent that so that my tax is calculated just on inventory amount?
4)     DO I have to put total in amount field (meaning inventory amount + fright ) or not .
I will be grateful if someone can guide me towards right direction. Please give me a detailed answer. How does it work???
Thanks
Kavita Reddy

in standard setting the freight amount gets debit in the stock or inventoy account and gets credit in the fright accoutn at the time fo gr so it means the amount of frieght is gettting invenotrised
now at the time of IV IN MIRO SYSTEM CREDITS THE VENDOR ACCOUNT AND DEBITS THE GR/IR account
if u want to settele the planned delivery cost then select the laout variant for the planned delivery at item level
or in case if u want to make use of the unplanned delivery cost then u r doing the right step
but as u simulate the g/l accounts sytem will debit the inventory or stock account for it rather then frieght account (i belive so )
as the uplanned delivery cost may be getting inventorised that is added to the material price
and as u said u dont want to have tax calulated on the unplanned delivery cost then i suggest u to post it as subsequent debit and there do not make use of the claulate tax option or do the direct posting for the g/l account option

Negative delivery costs when releagins PO

Hi all,
When I am releasing a PO in t.code ME29N, I am getting the error 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'. First of all, why did the system apportion a negative delivery cost to one line item in my PO?
Second, how do I correct this error and go proceed normally?
Note my PO has several line items. And the delivery cost has been entered as a golbal amount. It is the system which does the apportionment.
Thanks for ur help.
Nas

Hi,
PLease check which condition is causing this error and change "rounding rule" to B. If this does not solve the error, I would recommend that you open a ticket at SAP.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Delivery Cost

Dear All,
Can negative delivery cost be maintained in the pricing procedure for Purchase order?
Regards,
Indranil

check this links
Delivery Costs
Re: Negative delivery costs not allowed
Negative delivery costs not allowed

Delivery cost input in MIRO

Hi Experts:
As some countries rules the delivery cost invoice must input before the Goods invoice(GR done) this SAP, if the the GR are not done to input the delivery cost in MIRO is very time consuming, is there any way we can mass input the delivery cost not one bye one the qty and cost?

Hi,
Go for Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS). ERS is used for invoice plan, through the use of Invoicing Plan for leasing agreements and such like (building rent, cultivation & farming etc), where aims to considerably reduce the manual data entry effort in the purchasing and invoice verification (A/P) department.
Regards,
Biju K

Negative delivery cost

when i make a deletion for line item in a PO it gives me message
"Negative delivery costs not allowed"
please advice

Check if you have any net discount at header level, so the new total of the PO is negative, and delivery cost resulting from a formula is being calculate as negative.

How to get rid of "Delivery costs have not been cleared" status = MM_EKKO

Hi dear experts,
During pretreatment of MM_EKKO archiving object (TA: SARA), I get an amazing huge amount of PO position which can not be archived due to "*Delivery costs have not been cleared*".
I tried several ways to find out how to solve this issue but without any success.
Point is that we do not clear delivery cost regarding those PO positions, but delivery cost are transfered directly to a global account.
It means that those PO's won't never be cleared.
Any ideas about how I can fix this issue?
Best regards,
Daniel

Yep,
no idea why, but when I uncheck the "Final Invoice" box save and went back into the same PO and check again the same "Final Invoice" box, then, as a miracle, SARA=>MM_EKKO=> Pretreatment knows that this document is cleared and can be archived.
It is just that for now, really old PO's are located in the present residence time
I hope this slyness will help someone else one day.
Regards,
Daniel
Edited by: Daniel Putzschler on Jul 28, 2009 2:02 PM

How to Archive PO for which delivery costs has not been settled ?

Hi dear experts,
For Intra company STO, documents weren't getting archived due to the error message.Scenario is mentioned below.
During pretreatment of MM_EKKO archiving object (TA: SARA), I get an amazing huge amount of PO position which can not be archived due to "*Delivery costs have not been cleared*".
I tried several ways to find out how to solve this issue but without any success.
Point is that we do not clear delivery cost regarding those PO positions.
It means that those PO's won't never be cleared.
Any ideas about how I can fix this issue?
Best regards,
Deepak

Dear Jurgen,
Scenario is as follows:
An Intra company STO is created without delivery costs.
Next step is delivery creation.
Shipment is created with creation of shipment cost document
The shipment costs are distributed accordingly to the items in the PO and they're stamped back in the PO with the condition type ZFRB(copy of FRB1)
This will act as a reference and added to the material cost in the receiving plant.
As the shipment cost document creates a service PO and its cleared with a Invoice being posted in MIRO and subsequently in FI,they aren't clearing the value which is open in the Original stock transport order.
Regards,
Deepak

Delivery Cost not to be inventorised

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for