Delivery costs not reversed (MIGO - 102)
Dear all,
I need to cancel a material document (101) of which the freight costs correctly posted (101), with 2 different condition types and a different vendor for each of them.
Now with MIGO (102), I am able to reverse the freight costs for the first condition type, but not the second one. Both condition types have a very similar setup in the customizing and I do not understand why one of the freight amounts does not get reversed in MIGO (neither in MBST) whereas it was correctly posted with 101.
Any ideas?
Annabelle R.
Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89 311010 STK RAW MAT 18,219.00
002 96 408111 UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT 11,489.81-
003 86 601120 PURCHASES RAW MAT (O 548.57
004 50 408113 UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP 6,384.00-
005 50 408113 UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP 893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no. Description Tx Amount in USD
001 99 311010 STK RAW MAT 18,219.00-
002 86 408111 UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT 11,489.81
003 86 601120 PURCHASES RAW MAT (O 345.19
004 40 408113 UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP 6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R.
Similar Messages
-
Delivery costs not reversed in GR reversal
Hi,
I have a situation where in PO following conditions are used-
ZR0 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type
ZR2 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - Delivery cost - (100% of ZR0)
ZR3 - (-100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - (-100% of ZR0)
When I post the GR, the following entries are posted-
148000 CAInv NonTradStock S 30,421.60 AUD
311700 CLPbls GR-IR Clearin 64,991.68- AUD
629935 Std-Actual Price Var 34,570.08 AUD
611900 Purchasing (FG) 64,991.68 AUD
611910 Purchase offset (FG) 64,991.68- AUD
311700 CLPbls GR-IR Clearin 14,504.64- AUD (ZR0)
120240 CARecv Sundry-Extern 14,504.64 AUD
311700 CLPbls GR-IR Clearin 14,504.64 AUD (ZR2)
311700 CLPbls GR-IR Clearin 14,504.64- AUD (ZR3)
But when I reverse the GR, the following entries only are posted-
99 148000 CAInv NonTradStock S 32,653.56- AUD
86 311700 CLPbls GR-IR Clearin 64,991.68 AUD
96 629935 Std-Actual Price Var 32,338.12- AUD
50 611900 Purchasing (FG) 64,991.68- AUD
40 611910 Purchase offset (FG) 64,991.68 AUD
Can you please let me know why the ZR0/ZR2/ZR3 cond are not reversed in the 102 movement?Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89 311010 STK RAW MAT 18,219.00
002 96 408111 UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT 11,489.81-
003 86 601120 PURCHASES RAW MAT (O 548.57
004 50 408113 UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP 6,384.00-
005 50 408113 UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP 893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no. Description Tx Amount in USD
001 99 311010 STK RAW MAT 18,219.00-
002 86 408111 UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT 11,489.81
003 86 601120 PURCHASES RAW MAT (O 345.19
004 40 408113 UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP 6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R. -
Negative delivery costs not allowed
Hi Experts,
In the below situation I am getting message like 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'.Please
give your suggestions.
There is a PO line item which I want to check the 'Delivery completion indicator' But when I am
going to change mode of the PO, in that line item delivery costs are coming in negative & samething
is shown in PO header condition tab as well.
So system throws message that ' PO Header still faulty'. 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'.
Please suggest how to overcome this problem.
Regards,
ParthaHi,
PLease check which condition is causing this error and change "rounding rule" to B. If this does not solve the error, I would recommend that you open a ticket at SAP.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack -
Delivery cost not created during GRN of PO using BAPI
I have a customized program which use BAPI - BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create PO, PO was created successully.
then program will use BAPI - BAPI_PO_CHANGE to update condition pricing, which is also executed succesfully. all condition pricing (KONV) updated correctly.
Lastly, the program will use BAPI - BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create GRN and update delivery cost. However in my case, the delivery cost is not update, EKBZ table record is not created, as well as GRN item line table MSEG table is not updated with delivery cost.
Anyone face this type of problem before?What is the possible causes?
Any help and suggestion is greatly appreciated.Lai,
you should try asking this on ABAP forum thread. You will get a response. May be there is another BAPI u should use or may be you the usage of BAPI is incomplete. Pl confirm with ABAP forum.
Rgds -
UNPLANNED DELIVERY COST NOT PROPERLY DISTRIBUTED TO MATERIAL LINE ITEM
Hi ,
Presently my system is Configured to distribute Unplanned Delivery Costs among invoice items,but it is not properly distributed among line item while doing the posting.
What may be the problem,Is there any additional settings to be checked ?or in which areas i need to check? Plz Help regarding this.
Thanks,
RajuHi,
Plz chek the SPRO settings for unplanned delivery cost. You need to maintain the company code
in SPRO - Material Management - Logistics Invoice Verification -Incoming invoices - Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
regards -
GR based IV for delivery costs not working
Hi Gurus,
GR based IV is not working for certain delivery costs. I have not assigned any accrual key to the condition type in the calculation schema.
When I try to perform invoice verification for the delivery cost, the GR quantity / value does not appear automatically.
Is there anything I need to do with the schema / condition type?
Regards,
AroopHi Kumar,
I had missed out the Vendor in GR option 2 in the condition type configuration: I changed it to 2, but the problem remains.
During PO creation, the vendor gets mentioned against the condition type automatically.
Any further idea on this?
Regards,
Aroop -
Planned delivery cost not updating Through Invoic02 idoc
Hi,
We are using Inbound IDOC (INVOIC02) to create invoice. The enhancement that we are looking to do is to use the indicator Goods/Service items + planned delivery costs which is seen when we manually post invoices using MIRO. Can you please let us know of any inputs in this regard.
For your information - the current functional module we are using to post invoices received through EDI is IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM and the message type is INVOIC. But this does not seem to help us in case of goods which has got a planned freight attached to it.
Thanks
ShasiHi Experts ,
Kaindly provide me your inputs ..
Thanks
Shasi -
Delivery Cost not to be inventorised
Dear all,
I need your advise in our business scenario.
Basic Price = 100.00
Customs duty = 10.00
I dont want to inventorise the customs duty to the material cost but required as a separate entry like below:
Inventory account Dr. 100.00
Customs duty Dr. 10.00
GR/IR clearing a/c Cr. 110.00
Because the imported materials are exported within 180 days. Initially we pay the customs as deposit not as a duty. If we are unable to export within 180 days then the deposit amount should get transferred to Customs duty account and to be inventorised to the material account.
Please advise.
Regards,
S.SureshHi Suresh,
For this you define respecive custom duty condition type as accrual in customizing and condition type as delivery cost then after in pricing procedure mentin your defined account keys against custom duty condition type.
Hope it will solve your problem
Regards
VS -
Negative delivery costs when releagins PO
Hi all,
When I am releasing a PO in t.code ME29N, I am getting the error 'Negative delivery costs not allowed'. First of all, why did the system apportion a negative delivery cost to one line item in my PO?
Second, how do I correct this error and go proceed normally?
Note my PO has several line items. And the delivery cost has been entered as a golbal amount. It is the system which does the apportionment.
Thanks for ur help.
NasHi,
PLease check which condition is causing this error and change "rounding rule" to B. If this does not solve the error, I would recommend that you open a ticket at SAP.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack -
Dear All,
Can negative delivery cost be maintained in the pricing procedure for Purchase order?
Regards,
Indranilcheck this links
Delivery Costs
Re: Negative delivery costs not allowed
Negative delivery costs not allowed -
Hi Experts:
As some countries rules the delivery cost invoice must input before the Goods invoice(GR done) this SAP, if the the GR are not done to input the delivery cost in MIRO is very time consuming, is there any way we can mass input the delivery cost not one bye one the qty and cost?Hi,
Go for Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS). ERS is used for invoice plan, through the use of Invoicing Plan for leasing agreements and such like (building rent, cultivation & farming etc), where aims to considerably reduce the manual data entry effort in the purchasing and invoice verification (A/P) department.
Regards,
Biju K -
when i make a deletion for line item in a PO it gives me message
"Negative delivery costs not allowed"
please adviceCheck if you have any net discount at header level, so the new total of the PO is negative, and delivery cost resulting from a formula is being calculate as negative.
-
Not to Post Planned Delivery Cost in IV before MIGO
Dear Experts,
We are maintaining the Delivery cost Condition values for different vendors in Purchase Order and we are selecting the GR Based IV check box. At the time of MIRO before making MIGO (Goods receipt) it will not allow to Post Incoming Invoice if I select Goods/Service items or both Goods/Service items & Planned Delivery Cost but it will allow if we select only Planned Delivery Cost to Post.
Kindly suggest us if anybody have the solution to restrict to Post the Planned Delivery cost before posting the Goods Receipt (MIGO).
Thanks & regards,
DhanuDear,
First u do the MIGO, After that post the Material IV with goods/service, after that u again do IV for planned delivery cost selection of Planned delivery cost.
Thanks,
If this is helpful for u then reward me. -
VI01 as delivery costs in MIGO
Hi all,
We have to change de Automatic PO generated in Shipment costs for Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt.
We have applied de SAP Note 427944.
. M/06
Condition type: 'B' delivery costs (T685A-KNTYP field)
Accrual: 'X' (T685A-KRUEK field)
Copy shp.costs: 'X' (T685A-BNKTK field)
. Entries in the calculation schema: (IMG -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price- Determination Process -> Define Calculation Schema)
In the calculation schema, an
1. Account key (T683S-KVSL1 field)
2. Account key - accruals/provisions (Field T683S-KVSL2)
must be specified for the corresponding condition type (similar to the FRB1 condition type in schema RM0000). Note that this condition is always marked as 'statistical' in the condition screen of the purchase order regardless of the settings in the price schema because it is an accrual.
. Purchase order: The condition type should not be valuated in the purchase order item, that is, the condition value is 0.
. Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected
shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
Calculated C Fully calculated
Assigned C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred C transferred
. In T_56 the
u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST is D Release shipment cost item
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status are only
Calculated C Fully calculated but in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them the status are
Calculated C Fully calculated
Assigned C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred A Not transferred and in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
The process is :
ME21N
VL31N
VT02N (automatically)
VI01 (no PO automatically as before)
MIGO material GR for the inbound delivery of VL31N AND accounting of the delivery costs. THE ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS is missing why??
Someone can help?
Cheers
martaHi,
Just to clarify my questions. In the note 427944 explain that
1 . Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
*It means that the 3 status must be : Calculated C Fully calculated + Assigned C Account assignment fully completed + Transferred C transferred ?*
Other thing:
2 *. In T_56 the u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST must be D Release shipment cost item?*
3. In T_56 If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status showed in VI01 are only Calculated C Fully calculated b
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them in VI01 the status are Calculated C Fully calculated /Assigned C Account assignment fully completed / Transferred A Not transferred. *Why I can not do the transfer?*
as is Transferred A Not transferred them in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS.
Could you help me with one of these three questions?
Thank you very much,
marta -
"Reverse" planned delivery costs stated in PO
Hi,
In PO, we planned this delivery costs. During Post Goods Receipt, the amount of this delivery costs is debited into stock. So the accounting entries during PGR is Debit Stock, Credit GR/IR
But later, we discover that this is wrong- there will not be any logistic invoice for this and there will not be such costs. How can we reverse such an entry and close the outstanding PO due to this line? So I want to Credit Stock, Debit GR/IR. If there is no stock, it should be posted to Cost of Goods Sold.
Your help is much appreciated.
Thank you.Hi,
Please check transaction-MR11 ,it will post the differences of GR/IR as per your requirement.
Thanks & regards,
Sandesh Sawant
Maybe you are looking for
-
The email which was used for my iCloud and Applie ID is no longer available to me and the password is not being recognised. I need to update my iphone to the new iCloud account and I am unable to delete the old as it keeps asking for the pasword for
-
can't use Power view in Excel 2013. When clicking Insert -> power view, I got the error such as "can't load data model", then the error "exception from HRESULT: 0x800A03EC" is got.
-
Jdeveloper version and ADF runtime on weblogic
Hi I would need to understand the link between the jdeveloper version and the Weblogic version. Based on this article http://tompeez.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/jdeveloper-versions-vs-weblogic-server-versions/ it sounds like the server version to use is
-
hi i have a view when i time that view using set timing on ; set autotrace trace; select * from emp_view where emp_id='abc' ; it takes 200 milli seconds to return the rows i have another procedure which accepts emp_id as in put in side the procedure
-
HT201412 the phone only shows connect to itunes...help
I tried syncing my new iphone5 to itunes. I tunes has been uninstalled and updated. It does not recognize the iphone. Drivers are there and up to date...help.