Depreciation calculated wrongly

Hi guru's,
    we are using SLM method and given 33.33% dep.but system calculating 33.2895% for this depreciation amount not matching with user file.any one tell me why this happen?
Thanks
Ravi

Hi
The system calculates the Depreciation based on the Useful Life.
As said by you , the system is calculating as 33.2895% , you want it to calculate it as 33.33%.
In Configuration Activate the Rounding for Depreciation Calculation , then you will get the desired.
Cheers
Venkat

Similar Messages

  • Wrong depreciation calculated for base value 04 + EA-FIN activated

    Hi,
    after activating EA-FIN, depreciation for assets using base value 04 (= half of replacement value) is calculated wrong.
    While AW01 for a particular asset shows depreciation values based on the FULL replacement value (like it would be base value 03) AW01_AFAR (the u201Coldu201D asset explorer) shows the correct depreciation for base value 04.
    The wrong base value can also be seen using the "display depreciation calculation" button in both transactions.
    There are no enhancements for base value determination active.
    I didnu2019t find any SAPNET notes nor SCN entries regarding this case, any ideas?
    Best regards, Christian

    For what it's worth, I did a search and didn't find anything either. 
    It sounds like you've already tried this, but if the base value (the actual $$ value) is different in the trace on both tcodes then you have a problem.  I would be sure to recalculate the values when you enter AW01 and AW01_AFAR to ensure that it's correct before looking at the trace.
    The formula for the replacement value is: 
    ( u_ganlc-kansw + u_ganlc-answl +
                   u_ganlc-kmafa + u_ganlc-mafav + u_ganlc-zusma +
                   u_ganlc-mafam + u_ganlc-mafal +
                   u_ganlc-kaufw + u_ganlc-aufwv +
                   u_ganlc-aufwp + u_ganlc-aufwl ) / 2 .
    I'd look at ANLC for the asset and do the calculation yourself to confirm the value. 
    You've probably done all of that so I predict an OSS message in your future !
    -nathan

  • Incorrect Depreciation Calculated by the system

    Hi,
    In Oracle Fixed Assets, the system is calculating wrong depreciation.According to the client, the actual depreciation should be x amount but the system shows some different amount.
    Product details:
    EBS Version : 11.5.10.2
    Database: 9i
    For example:-
    Asset No. xxx
    COST               6,206,674.00
    Recoverable cost      5,586,006.60
    Date in Service          01.04.2002
    Rate of Dep ( % )     7.84
    Open FA Period Jan-09
    Amount calculated as per system:-
    Accumulated Depreciation 4,601,802.45
    YTD Depreciation 406,279.95
    This is actual amount which
    system should calculate.
    Accumulated Depreciation 3,330,232.60
    YTD Depreciation 40,794,682.72
    Please let us know how can we check the formula used by the system in calculating the depreciation.
    We checked the depreciation method from the system.Details are as below:-
    Method Type: Flat
    Calculation Basis: Cost
    Depreciation Basis Rule: USE RECOVERABLE COST.
    Depreciation in Year Retired(Checked)
    Formula button is disabled.
    Regards,
    Carine.

    we procure material on valuation type val100%. material is received in store and placed. after that it is issued from store from val100% valaution type.
    after sometime user want to return the material to store again but he says that it can be usable, but its value does not remain 100%, so he return the material in store in val50% valuation type.
    client wants this when user will return the material back to store in val50% valuation type, system should calculate the value from val100% valuation type MAP, and divide ty two so that it becomes val50% valuation type value at the time of return instead of this that user will enter the value ExtGA amount in LC in issuance screen.
    Hope its clear nw.
    Johi
    Edited by: Johi Kapoor on May 4, 2011 9:44 AM
    Edited by: Johi Kapoor on May 5, 2011 6:02 AM
    Edited by: Johi Kapoor on May 5, 2011 8:31 AM

  • Asset depreciation calculation for prevous year  when legacy data transfere

    Hello,
    Asset Legacy Data transfer has made as on 31.12.2006. so, for the first period asset depreciation calculation has done wrongly  i.e. on the first period of 2007. but it was not noticed at that point of time, now after 2 years, the cumulative difference is coming out very big.
    for 1st period, in Asset Value Tab of AS03,  for period 01 , 2007 when i am checking right now it shows for dep. Area 01 right now that Amt to be post (14.48) instead of that in the next line for Dep. area 20 and in the next line it shows, Amt. to be posted ( -0.28). hence, for next period only differnce amount is posted in G/L side instead of actual it should be posted as 14.76.
    so, now because of this error, my G/L and AA sides are not matching up.
    eventhough i post manual reversal entry via FB01, when i will run ABST2 there will be problem.
    if i run manual unplanned depreciation, then will my problem of not matching of Asset side and GL side will be solved. ?
    also, please provide suggestion from your end in order to solve this issue.
    Thanking you for your help.
    Jigs.

    We cannot post any depreciation to previous fiscal year 2008 as no planned depreciation is envisaged for the previous year 2008. The transfer date for Legacy asset data transfer is maintained as 12/31/2008 and takeover values are uploaded accordingly. Hence, 2009 is a first year for Asset Accounting of the company code.
    However, Depreciation posting program checks for previous period log while executing for the current period. The logs are stored in u201CTABAu201D table. For new company code there will not be any entries in TABA table.
    Due to missing functionality, System is checking for previous year depreciation posting logs even though the current fiscal year is first year for planned depreciation and giving error message AA 687.
    As per SAP Note 144441 this error can be rectified with the help of correction program ZACORR_TABA_ENTRY_CREATE.
    Steps to Rectify the Error:
    1. Copy correction program from SAP Note 144441 into SAP System.
    2. Execute the program with transaction code SA38
    3. Check the values in test mode
    4. If the table is updated with documennt number , remove the test mode tick and execute again
    5. Execute the deprecation
    Edited by: Ramesh Reddy Nalamada on Jul 25, 2009 1:17 AM

  • Forecast calculated wrongly

    Hello Team,
    The problem is that movement types 631/632 (deliveries to customer consignment stock) were not taken into consideration.
    I added them manually, but the figures in MC94 after this transaction is not relevant to MB51. And that is the reason that forecast was calculated wrongly.
    Could you please help me in this. Help will be appriciated.

    It may be you aquire the assets in Mid year and calculating the depreciation from that month,but system is  posting total depreciation in that particular month by taking in to account all the previous month depreciation
    Have check the depreciation by changing the depreciation start date to start of your Asset accounting year
    Thanks
    Ansuman
    Edited by: Ansuman mohanty on Mar 31, 2008 1:10 PM

  • GR/IR clearing account calculating wrong price

    HI
    I am facing the problem with GR/IR clearing a/c, when the user is creating MIGO transation with ref Scheduled agreement PO, its calculating wrong price.
    My scenario is :-
    Scheduled agreement PO has been created in USD currency (Qua 370*356.07)
    While I am doing the MIGO itu2019s not calculating correctly.
    I can give some more information below
    Company code currency is RUB but transaction currency is USD
    PO is creating in USD
    Material ledger is activated for this material
    Currency exchange rates are updated in daily basis
    When I am doing the MIGO the document was created like below
    1709250    Duties accrual                     603.152,52- RUB             19.761,89- USD
    1100100    Comm.Inv.fin.pr.                 4.624.163,80  RUB            151.507,60 USD
    1614000    Transit match.acc.                 422.859,09- RUB             13.870,37- USD
    7774100    Pr.diff.oth.goods.               3.598.152,19- RUB            117.875,34- USD
    Actually posting is (370356.07=131745.9)
    *But here it is showing 13.870.37
    I am very thanking full for your Inputs.
    Thanks
    Ramakrishna
    Edited by: DRS12345 on Oct 27, 2010 11:31 AM

    Hi,
    What has already been posted in SAP has been posted. One alternative in front of you is to create adjustment postings in PCA to post to the correct Profit Center. You can use transaction code 1KEL or 9KE0 for the same but it may not work as most probably you will the GR/IR clearing account set to "Post automatically" in the GL Master. In such a scenario the only option would be to have customized program to create IDOCs with Message Type "PRCMAS" to post the adjustment postings in your system.
    regards

  • Absence Deduction is calculated wrong for one employee

    Hi,  We have an employee who changed his absence booking for the year and all of sudden his absence deduction is not calculating properly.  His total absence quota was 20 days.  He initially booked all 20 days and then cancelled them and created a new booking for 9.5 days but his deduction is saying 16.5 days.
    Is there a way I can check his records why it's only happening to him.  Also I am new to this so not sure where to start investigating.  I did check the deduction rule and it's ok - calculates correctly for other employees, only this particular employee is calculating wrong.

    Hi Joe,
    I did replicate it for another employee belonging to the same group and it calculated correctly.  And the 9.5 days already excludes holidays and weekends.  Not sure what else to check at this point.  Although the only difference in the records of the 2employees is that the problematic employee has a negative carryover from previous year.  not sure exactly what that means.

  • Scheduling Agreement JIT / Forecast calculating wrong

    Hello experts,
    I´m with a problem with JIT / Forecast.
    The forecast are calculating wrong values. For example:
    Cumulative quantity calculated: 584
    JIT schedule:
    DATE             TIME         Order Quantity       Cml. released quantity        Open Quantity
    06.01.2012     00:00     32          32                      
    10.01.2012     00:00     352          384                      
    13.01.2012     00:00     128          512                      
    17.01.2012     00:00     88          600              16
    Forecast schedule
    DATE             TIME         Order Quantity       Cml. released quantity        Open Quantity
    20.01.2012     00:00     112          112                      
    24.01.2012     00:00     224          336                      
    27.01.2012     00:00     128          464                      
    31.01.2012     00:00     200          664          
    The values of forecast are calculating by Cumulative quantity calculated that is 584 and I dont have any Open Quantity and in this case I need to have Open Quantity in Forecast.
    The forecast must not be calculated by the amount in transit
    Help me.
    Tks
    LFC

    Hi ashish
    Check the  planning delivery schedule tab and go to item data -> delivery schedule header and check wheather any proper information has been filled or not
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Error In Posting to accounts - PF  calculated wrong

    Hi,
    I am getting error in Posting to accounts- error - Posting balance is not cleared (Period -
    Following Wage types are calculated wrong  -
    Expense
    MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000
    MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 =6,500.000
    Balance sheet
    MF90 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,000 = 715,000.000-
    MF70 EDLI contri * 1,00,000 = 325,000.000-
    MF80 EDLI adm chrgs * 1,00,000 =6,500.000-
    /3P2 Professional Tax Basis = 8,387.096-
    Symbolic accounts assigned are as standard - no changes made
    Please help me solve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    Monica

    Hi Monica,
    We have solved this issue in our company.
    For this you have to create another wage types & make a "PCR" as it divide the 100000 amount from the technical wage types, & then instead of posting the technical wage types post the new wage types u have created.
    Don't worry about statutory reports as in there SAP is using some factor which will give the correct value.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Planned overhead is calculating wrongly in CK11N run, it is just more than double

    Hi Gurus
    1) While running CK11N overhead cost is calculating wrongly on base (material price). In my case I have maintained 1% Overhead on raw material for Duty in cost sheet. In my case no routing, and my FG is getting produced by process order. My Raw material cost is showing Rs. 2,364.45 but my Duty is showing Rs. 48.73, When I run CK11N for Finished goods.
    When I Check the costing structure it is showing all the material for costing, if i drill down there it is calculating correctly for Raw materials. Say heavy furnace oil material cost is Rs. 36,140.16 /M.T and overhead is Rs. 361.40 and for all raw material it is calculating correct 1%. But for my finished goods it is just more than 2%.
    As per my understanding over head is calculating for RM once @ 1% and later material cost + overhead cost getting calculated by 1% again.
    Please see the attachment. I have furnished a statement for this also.
    2) Also Please tell me the T-Code for costing run as actual cost. and how can I show a comparison report on planned and actual report for a product costing.
    3) My scenario is this is a power generation Co. Not possible to maintain activity cost. What they want to do is. on the last day of a month they will take the trial balance for the plant/ business area and will set the percentage in cost sheet (Actual for current month / planned for next month) for admin, manpower and other costs based on raw material GL values.
    So I have created a cost sheet where I have maintained base and assigned those RM GL/ Cost elements and other costs I have maintained in cost sheet based on row No. 10 (base) and assigned secondary cost elements and percentages assigned as per overhead type and plant, in cost component structure I have maintained same cost elements as set earlier in cost sheet.
    Please find the file attached
    Please suggest me if I M wrong.
    Thanks & Regards
    Subrata

    Hi.
    In itemization of CK11N over head is showing correct. But the material cost for RM is already after charging overhead. I have checked the itemization of Process order there for the first material was Rs. 144.56, but in the itemization view of CK11N it is showing Rs.148.90/- That means exactly after adding 3% overhead which I maintained in cost sheet.
    Itemization of Ck11N
    Itemization of COR2
    Please Help
    Thanks & Regards
    Subrata

  • Depreciation calculated on credit memo is more than its own value

    Hi,
    We have noticed that the depreciation calculated on credit memo is more than its own values.
    please refer the screen shot below:
    24.05.2010     108,044.64     120     Goods receipt     108,044.64-     0     USD
    24.05.2010     108,044.64     120     Goods receipt     108,044.64-     0     USD
    24.05.2010     108,044.64     120     Goods receipt     108,044.64-     0     USD
    09.06.2010     128,064.75     120     Goods receipt     128,064.75-     0     USD
    22.06.2010     110,601.38     120     Goods receipt     110,601.38-     0     USD
    22.06.2010     7,346.35-     105     Credit memo in acquis. year45,337.47     0     USD
    22.06.2010     7,346.35     100     External asset acquisition     45,337.47-     0     USD
    Please let us know the possible reasons...
    Thanks a lot..

    Hi,
    Here are the details:
    Depreciation start date:21.11.2004
    Operating readiness: 23.12.2004
    Asset value date: 16.08.2010
    useful life: 01 period
    Kindly tell me know in case you need further info
    Thanks..
    Edited by: FI User on Oct 21, 2010 9:47 AM

  • Tax depreciation - calculation of WDV

    Hi
    where do we configure the settings for calculating the WDV for income tax depreciation or it is preset in the system
    Regards
    Ajay

    Dear Nagesha,
    Please note that J1INQ is NOT in use and this report has been withdrawn by SAP.
    Please review the below note in this reference.
    738919 - IT Depreciation for Assets, India
    The solution for IT Depreciation Calculation is being revamped and the
    new solution shall be available in EhP5 SP02.
    The general availability of this report will be announced through this
    note.
    There is no alternative as of now for the same.
    Thanks for the understanding and co-operation.
    Have a Nice Day,
    if you are ok with the above info, then close this ticket.
    Manu
    Edited by: manucs on Dec 29, 2011 10:12 AM

  • Indian Income Tax Depreciation Calculation

    Hi
    Can any of you please explain/tell me where are the exact SAP configuration settings for the calculation of depreciation calculation as per Indian Income Tax Act by meeting below requirements as per Section 32 of Indian Income Tax Act:
    1. If the Asset is being purchased and used in a Financial Year for 180 Days or below 180 Days  -  Depreciation has to be calculated 50% of Annual Depreciation.
    2.If the Asset is being purchased and used in a Financial Year for more than  180 Days   -  Depreciation has to be calculated 100% of Annual Depreciation.
    Waiting for your valuable reply.
    Thanks and Regards
    P.V.S.R.Gupta

    But if I follow your suggestion of taking Period Control Method 04, it would calculate 1/2 Year Depreciaton only
    No.  If the asset is in use for >180 days, then it's acquisition date must therefore occur in periods 1-6 which will set the depreciation start date to the beginning of the year.  This will result in a full year's worth of depreciation.
    If the asset is in use for <180 days then the start date is set to mid year which results in only 6 months worth of depreciation to be posted. 
    All of this can be adjusted per your FYV and on a yearly basis if the FYV is year dependent in the asset period control calendar assignments table. 
    I'll be the first to admit that I don't know the statutory requirements of India but I know how FI-AA works and can't think of an alternative solution for you.
    -nathan

  • Depreciation calculation for Indian Tax Depreciation Area - Fixed Assets

    Can any one of you kindly advice how to setup the Multi levels methods and Period controls for Tax Depreciation key in Indian Tax Depreciation area.
    My Leading ledger Fiscal year: Jan u2013 Dec (Year dependend)
    And Non-leading ledger (India) Fiscal year: April u2013 March (Year dependend)
    I was able to post correct depreciation for leading and non-leading ledger Depreciation areas with a stated percentage. But the calculation of Tax depreciation area is incorrect.
    As per client requirement, Tax depreciation area is setup only reporting purpose and no Depreciation posting.
    Required Depreciation Calculation for Tax Depreciation Area:
    For Acquires & Additions,
    Rule1:
    If it is >=180 days (as per Non-leading ledger Fiscal year) the system should calculate depreciation as stated percentage. Eg: 10%
    Rule2:
    If it is <180 days (as per Non-leading ledger Fiscal year) the system should calculate depreciation of 50% on stated percentage. Eg: Stated percentage is 10%, then it should be 5%.
    Early responses will be appreciated.
    Thanks much for the help.
    Regards,
    Bapu

    Hi JBC,
    please search this Forum, I think basic questions about Indian tax depreciation have been asked dozen of times in this Forum here. You should find some answers in earlier threads.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Depreciation calculation for Indian Tax Depreciation Area

    Can any one of you kindly advice how to setup the Multi levels methods and Period controls for Tax Depreciation key in Indian Tax Depreciation area.
    My Leading ledger Fiscal year: Jan u2013 Dec (Year dependend)
    And Non-leading ledger (India) Fiscal year: April u2013 March (Year dependend)
    I was able to post correct depreciation for leading and non-leading ledger Depreciation areas with a stated percentage. But the calculation of Tax depreciation area is incorrect.
    As per client requirement, Tax depreciation area is setup only reporting purpose and no Depreciation posting.
    Required Depreciation Calculation for Tax Depreciation Area:
    For Acquires & Additions,
    Rule1:
    If it is >=180 days (as per Non-leading ledger Fiscal year) the system should calculate depreciation as stated percentage. Eg: 10%
    Rule2:
    If it is <180 days (as per Non-leading ledger Fiscal year) the system should calculate depreciation of 50% on stated percentage. Eg: Stated percentage is 10%, then it should be 5%.
    Early responses will be appreciated.
    Thanks much for the help.
    Regards,
    JBC

    Hi JBC,
    please search this Forum, I think basic questions about Indian tax depreciation have been asked dozen of times in this Forum here. You should find some answers in earlier threads.
    Regards,
    Markus

Maybe you are looking for