Depreciation Planned Values missing in AW01N

Hi ,
we have a scenario in which few assets is not showing any depreciation values for period 9 (i.e. post/planned), instead the depreciation value period 9 is transferred to the period 10.
Example: if depreciation value is 100 EUR for all the periods (1-12) and the depreciation run is successfully completed till period 8 for an asset. when we analyse the period 9 planned values in Asset Explorer screen, the entire row is missing and the period 10 is showing with a planned value of 200 EUR (inlcusive of period 9).
Any solution to rectify this scenario ?
Regards
Govindarajan

Hi
In AFAB
1. PLANNED posting run
2. REPEAT
3.RESTART
4. UNPLANNED posting run
While claculating dep which dep key you select from the above fileds. check it properly
Thanks
Anil

Similar Messages

Planned Values Missing from report S_PL0_86000029

Planned Values Missing from report S_PL0_86000029, how to rectify this?
Where to plug in the values?

it's Plan actual comparison in the Profit and Loss Financial Statement.
This Transaction Code is for Profit Loss Statement whereby the Planned values have to be seen.
But one thing, I have also deleted the planned values from the General Ledger and Profitability Analysis.
Need to get these Planned values. But from Where?
Deleting GL Planned values - GLDE
Deleting COPA values - KEDB
This is what I have used.
Edited by: Bhatia on Oct 9, 2008 8:16 PM

Asset Depreciation Planned values

Hi Everyone,
There is a requirement for us to pull planned as well as posted depreciation values for assets. The input for the program would essentially be Fiscal Year, selected list of asset class & cost centers. We are using the FM 'AM_SHOW_POST_DEPR' to fetch posted & planned values. Now the issue is that, since not many key fields are provided, the report takes so much time to fetch the required assets and its posted / plan values. On doing a more close analysis it was found that 75 % of the data fetching time is consumed by the FM 'AM_SHOW_POST_DEPR'. Is there any other function modules / method to perform the activity done by this FM, so that the performance can be improved, or if possible can somebody provide the logic involved in asset plan data projection.
This FM returns the values which can be seen in posted values tab of the transaction code 'AW01N'.
Regards,
Kiran

You are talking about dep planned values thus this is not posted as actual values?
When the actuals values are posted there is longer planned values.
When you want to make changes you can use the transaction:
ABZU - Write-Up
When you want to do this you should re open fiscal year 2008 for asset accounting. Following on this you have to do the fiscal year closing again for 2008 and 2009.
This action will create postings in FI in 2008 and 2009!!!!!!!

Depreciation Planned Values for an Asset

Hi,
Can anybody suggest how can I bring the total planned depreciation values (month wise).
I would like to know the structure, table or function module.
We have tried with function module ANEP_AFARECHNEN but notfetching the results.
I know ANLC table shows the values but only for the years that are roll-forwarded by the system.
But, I want the planned depreciation values for complete life of the asset.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Ravi

Please check RA_AFABUCHEN
Please refer link:[http://www.se80.co.uk/sapfms/r/ra_a/ra_afabuchen.htm] for mapping the interface.
The parameter i_afbper identifies the period

AW01N shows planned values in period 12 under posted values tab

Hi,
I need to change the useful life and depreciation key of an asset. Before the change, the 2009 depreciation values in AW01N under the posted values tab shows 500,000 monthly depreciation from period 1 to period 12 totalling 6M for that year.
After changing depreciation key to ZLNR which has a base value key of 24 (net book value), system added another line item for a planned value of 3.750M.
Why did the system add another planned value? I do not want to change the 2009 depreciation values. However, I must show that the depreciation values in 2010 will "catch up" i.e. decreased depreciation because of longer useful life.
Thanks and regards,
Tess

Resolved. I must close the 2009 fiscal year first before changing the useful life and the depreciation key.

Depreciation planned information AW01N

Hi Dear experts;
We have area 31 as the inflation area for México, but in transaction AW01N the planned values for depreciation of the inflation appers all in the first month, and from month 2 to 12 the value is 0.00 (zero)
I.E.
Status      Period Ordinady Dep
Planned        1          -2000.00
Planned        2          0.00
Planned        3          0.00
Planned        4          0.00
Planned        5          0.00
Planned        6          0.00
Planned        7          0.00
Planned        8          0.00
Planned        9          0.00
Planned       10          0.00
Planned       11          0.00
Planned       12          0.00
Hope someone could help me
REgards

Hi,
Please check the following to help you identify the issue.
Please check the Depn key assigned for the Depn area in question in the Asset master data.
For that asset this may be a low value asset
Check the life of the asset for the depreciation area in the master data.
Regards
K.R

Error in Planned value Book depreciation in AS03

Hello,
We have 3 fiscal periods namely 2009, 2010, 2011. The assets are bought in the fiscal year 2009 and should be depreciated following a straight line method.
In May 2010, it was decided that the depreciation key for a depreciation area XXX should be modified from LINE to LINZ (that is from straight line to straight line with VMR 75%).
The errors that occured after this modification are:
1) Even though we are in fiscal year 2011, the planned value Book depreciation table for fiscal year 2011 is empty .
2) At the start of the year 2009, the asset has a scrap value of 3549,33 eur. This should not be the case since when an item is bought it only has an acquisition value and no scrap value.
3) Even though there has been a change in the depreciation key and the NBV has been decreasing over the years, the depreciation value in fiscal year 2010 is similar to the depreciation value on the fiscal year 2009.
We are trying to reproduce this error but we are unable to do so as we are not aware of the FI closure steps to be carried out.
Can you please share any ideas in case you have encountered a similar situation?
Thanking you in advance

Hi,
There are many reasons to it.
1) If the FYV is a non-standard one, please ensure that periods have been configured for future years.
2) Try executing AFAR (Recalculate depreciation).
Best Regards,
Madhu

Missing billing plan value in header of contract

We are using billing plan, but we don't see the value in the header for the contract.
Though we can see the correct values of the billing plan on item level. Are there any customizing steps we have overlooked?
Please take a look at picture
<a href="http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/1849/missingbillingplanxd8.jpg">Missing billing plan value</a>

Hi,
We can maintain plans at header level and item level.
If you enter billing dates/values at item level, system will not copy values to header.
If you enter billing dates/values at header level, it will copy values to item.
Eg.
1) Item level billing plan
You have 2 items in one sales order, and maintained different billing dates and values for each item.System will not copy values to header.
For same scenerio :
2) Header level billing plan
If you maintain blilling dates at header level, system will automatically distrubute dates and values for both the line items.
Best Regards,
Chandrasekhar.S

Depreciation planned for wrong period

Dear All,
In Asset Master the depreciation is settle to start in 01.10.2010, I already run depreciations for all assets in period 10 but not for period 11.
I only acquired the asset after running depreciation for period 10, so in AFAB I have to run depreciation again for period 10 in "repeat" mode right?
Problem is...when I do that, the outcome is zero as if I didn´t make a new acquisition for that period, after that I went to asset explorer (AW01N) and in tab "Posted values" depreciations only starts in period 11.
Example (of what is shown in asset in AW01N):
Acquisition value: 1000 $
Acquisition date: 15.10.2010
Dep. start date: 01.10.2010 (period 10 already been run)
Planned values:
- period 11: 50 $
- period 12: 25 $
Why depreciation doesn´t starts in period 10? Instead period 11 "eats" values from period 10. I want to run again period 10 but it doesn´t have values. Can anyone tell me why this happens?
Thanks in advance,
MG.

Hi,
You can execute depreciation again for period 10 with repeat option.
Best Regards,
Madhu

In which areas planned values affect..

Hello Experts,
Can You tell me that in which which areas and modules the planned values of asset module is connected...
E.G. If we change anything related to life of the asset or something else where where it wil affect. If any one has any chart or PPt regarding that.. can you share?

Hi
It will affect the Planned Values (Dep Values) in the Asset Master in AW01N
Upon next dep run, the differential depreciation of all open previous period / Fiscal year will be posted in the next period / over the next periods
Eg: APC Value 12000, Use ful life 12 months.... So, Dep each month is 1000... You posted Dep till March (3 months)... You change the useful life to 6 months in April....
So, the depreciation posted in April will be 12000/6 (2000)+ (2000-1000) x 3 = 5000 i.e. 2000 of April month + delta depreciation 1000 of earlier months.... This is if you dont tick the SMOOTHING indicator in OAYR
If you tick the smoothing indicator in OAYR, the delta depreciation 3000 will be spread over Apr-Dec i.e. 9 months instead of posting in April itself
Br, Ajay M

Asset still showing planned value for closed fiscal year.

*We have a situation:- After we ran depreciation for Dec 2009, there was a credit memo posting done in the system for a particular asset. Now, the fiscal year has been closed for 2009 and 2010 is opened. Jan and Feb depreciation posting has been done for the asset for year 2010, but the credit memo posting is still stuck as planned value in the 12th period of 2009. How can we take care of that? I canu2019t run unplanned depreciation for 2009. Is there a better way to take care of this? I thought about opening year 2009 for the asset (ccode) and then running unplanned depreciation. Will that be a problem? If yes, what other solution can be proposed.*
*Appreciate the response.*

Hi,
If it is not possible to open the fiscal year because audit
has already been completed we have a workaround which is not quite
correct from the legal side ist thereport RACORR20_A from note 29694.
If in table ANLC there are differences between posted and planed
depr. the report simply makes: planed = posted.
The correct way would be:
-> Reopen your GL for FY 2008 via OB52.
-> Recalculate values (RAAFAR00)
-> RAPOST2000
-> RAPERB2000
-> RAJABS00
Regards Bernhard

APC Value and Plan Value for an Asset.

HI Gurus,
I am developing a report where I have to display the APC value and Plan value of an Asset.Can anyone pls give an insight how to find this for the Asset.

Hi,
why don´t you use the logical database ADA which most of the FI-AA standard reports do? The logical database is a service to get this information without developing all the READ information and translation by yourself, especially when talking about mid-year-reporting, consistence checks, etc..
If you decide to use ADA, then the events GET ANLA0, GET ANLAV and GET ANLCV are from interest for you for information about APC and planned/posted depreciation value.
Regards,
Markus

Asset planned values computed positive value Issue

HI experts,
I have an existing asset problem where the planned depreciation values becomes positive. Why does it becomes positive? How does system calculates this planned values? We just did some adjustment to the Asset by Credit Memo and another Mark-up transaction. Sample:
Asset 1610600065
Planned Values - Transactions:
26.02.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85-     98,666.66     98,666.66     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85     98,666.66-     98,666.66-     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48-     93,333.33     93,333.33     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48     93,333.33-     93,333.33-     SGD
26.02.2011     160,000.00     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00-     0.00     0.00     SGD
23.06.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     60,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     101,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     33,925.92-     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
                                                               26,074.08     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
But the planned/posted value for this period is positive:
Status Status Period Amount
Green Posted     1     6,666.67-
Green Posted     2     6,666.66-
Green Posted     3     6,666.67-
Green Posted     4     6,666.67-
Green Posted     5     6,666.66-
Green Posted     6     6,370.37
YellowPlanned     7     4,493.83-
Posted Values - Depreciation Posted/Planned:
APC transactions     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Acquisition value     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Ordinary deprec.     220,000.00-     26,962.96-     246,962.96-     SGD
Unplanned dep.                    SGD
Write-ups          101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
Value adjustment                    SGD
Revaluation ord.dep.                    SGD
Net book value     180,000.00     85,629.63-     94,370.37     SGD
Down payments                    SGD
Scrap value                    SGD

I believe in your case, the tremendous reduction in APC cost has caused a tremendous change in planned depreciation. System looks at the NBV and the remaining periods of useful life each time it calcs depreciation. Of course also looks at depreciation key, Period Control, and OAYR Smoothing button. Asset class can also be set for group depreciation.
If a credit memo reduced the APC value dramatically, then the amount of depreciation on the asset at that moment is more than enough so far. This means that the next running of the AFAB program will reduce its amount of depreciation from the amount it was planning to book since it already has an excess of accumulated depreciation.
Please check in OAYR to know if your Smoothing indicator has been checked for the Company Code. As I understand the system, if this indicator is checked - the system will not catch-up the whole difference in the next running of AFAB. Instead, it will smooth out the adjustments due to credit memos, unplanned depreciation, and changes in remaining useful life over the remaining life of the asset. When smoothing is set, one gets less drastic period to period change.
This setting should be in line with your accounting rules, such as in US GAAP changes in depreciable life are considered estimate changes requiring only prospective corrections, and so should smooth out impact over remaining periods of useful life versus immediate catch-up.
You may want to run a AFAR (check for recalc flags) and then a Repeat AFAB in the current period after making master data changes for depreciation. All open periods would be impacted by master data changes if you run AFAB.

Depreciation(Planned & Posted) not coming after AFAB.

Depreciation is not at all coming after AFAB, even for the planned values. In the Asset GL only acquisition value is getting posted, no depreciation. I have checked and tried most of the threads related to this in the SAP Forum but still not able to solve this problem. Please suggest.

Hi
When you are running AFAB in background, check the spool for error messages in SP02. The most common issues are as:
1. If you are on new GL, required configuration not maintained in ACSET
2. No ranges not maintained for Document AF
3.Fiscal Period is closed for Posting
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Depreciation planned calculater not as remaining life balance

Hi SAP Expert,
Currently, i have an issue on depreciation planned calculate divided by 12 month instead of 2 month remaining life balance.
Asset Parameters
Useful Life: 3 / 0
Expired Useful Life: 2 / 10
Remaining Life: 0 / 2
Net book value balance is 59,907 and scarp value is 1. So depreciation will divided by 59,906.
Now i see the depreciation posted/planned is every month 4,992.17 for 12 months.
As the asset just left two month life, isn't that depreciation posted/planned will be 29,953 for 2 months?
I am suspect configure on depreciation key.
Please advice where to configure calculate depreciation base on remaining life?
Thanks
regards,
ng chong chuan

Hi sanjeev and Giridhar,
Thanks for your guys helping.
My depreciation key is set base on below
Dep/int                    Phase    Base method      Decl-bal method    Period Control   Multilevel method
Ord.depreciation    1            0011                   001                       005                  001
Ord.depreciation    1            0017                   001                       003                  003
Base method
0011
Type of depreciation            Ord.Depreciation
Dep. Method                       Percentage from the useful life
Reduce use.life at FY end    Blank
Dep.after plnd life end           No
Dep below NBValue zero      No
Curb                                   No
0017
Type of depreciation             Ord.Depreciation
Dep. Method                       Immediate depreciation
Reduce use.life at FY end    Check
Dep.after plnd life end           Yes
Dep below NBValue zero      No
Curb                                   No
Detail for the asset:
Acquisition Date        : 29.09.2006
Capitalization Date    :   29.06.2006
Useful Life                 :    3 years
Depreciation Start Date( Depreaciation Areas tab) : 01.06.2006
But i have seen the first depreciation posted on 30.09.2006 and not 30.06.2006
Please advice.
Thanks
regards,
ng chong chuan

Depreciation Planned Values missing in AW01N

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for