DOubt in CJ20N Transaction with Costing Model

Hello experts,
I have a Requirement which is as Follows:
After Entering to Transaction CJ20N, i am choosing the Project definitions, and after that choosing the
Project Structure and then the Easy Cost Planning.
My Requirement is I should modify the Form by Placing an approving Button in that.
The Details will be filled in that Form. After filling that, The manager can View that Details by entering in the same Transaction.
Once he Click the Approve Button, the details which ever entered by the users should be Reset to all other than the Manager.
so Experts Pls help me to Complete my Requirement.
Thanks,
Raja.

Via workfolw you can send any type of approval to project mgr / project team member etc.
If I say in general via workflow you can send workitem in the user's sap inbox in the form of email. user can approve /reject /modify that work item and give back to the reqester. If user has modified/approved/rejected that changes will get reflected SAP.
your technical can chekc that is that standard Business object is available for your Form. if not than they can customised the same.
Perticularly i have not used form as workitem. The situation i have narrated on that scenario i have worked.
I request you to ask the same in PP forum. because thae also use the txn CKCM.
Regards
Nitin

Similar Messages

Doubts in CJ20N transaction

Hi All.
In the CJ20N transaction code, Number of TAB is there, I have to mark the Check box (for field PRPS-USR11) in the User fields TAB based on my requirements. Could you tell me how can I do it.? Any exits is there? Is it possible to do it in BADi WBS_USER_FIELDS_F4 itself?
Please guide me.
Thanks.
Jay

In the method AT_SAVE.
Parameter IT_WBS_ELEMENT has associated structure CJBAI_WBSELEMENT_TABLE.
It includes structure PRPS which consists your field.
Registered: Mar 3, 2008
Total Posts: 15
Total Questions: 10 (9 unresolved)
If you dont bother about these , then you may not expect replies to your posts in future.

Doubt in CJ20N Transaction PS Module

Hello experts,
I have a Requirement which is as Follows:
After Entering to Transaction CJ20N, i am choosing the Project definitions, and after that choosing the
Project Structure and then the Easy Cost Planning.
After that am choosing the planning form which was designed by my Functional Consultant. Now the form got displayed.
My Requirement is I should modify the Form by Placing an approving Button in that.
Basically, the Details will be filled in that Form. After filling that, The manager can View that Details by entering in that Transaction.
Once he Click the Approve Button, the entered details should be Reset to all the Users other than the Manager.
so Experts Pls help me to Complete my Requirement.
Thanks,
Raja.

Via workfolw you can send any type of approval to project mgr / project team member etc.
If I say in general via workflow you can send workitem in the user's sap inbox in the form of email. user can approve /reject /modify that work item and give back to the reqester. If user has modified/approved/rejected that changes will get reflected SAP.
your technical can chekc that is that standard Business object is available for your Form. if not than they can customised the same.
Perticularly i have not used form as workitem. The situation i have narrated on that scenario i have worked.
I request you to ask the same in PP forum. because thae also use the txn CKCM.
Regards
Nitin

Transaction of item with cost-group 2008 results in cost-group comingle

Hi Folks,
I have the following error on Miscellaneous Transaction when I use a different cost group than the default one assign on subinventory:
Transaction of item with cost-group 2008 results in cost-group comingle
In our specific case, we define a CONVERSION subinventory with default Cost Group is X
We would like to create Miscellaneous Transactions (interface table) which use CONVERSION subinventory with different Cost Group.
The problem is when we use a Cost Group other than X, the "comingle" error occured.
Is there a manner to create a Miscellaneous Transactions base on a Cost Group different than the default define in the subinventory?
Regards

HI,
is not that type of error.
Actually there is no error. the system is working as it should.
I have used different cost groups in subinventories.
I need a way to change the cost group for some of the items.
I found some workaround in article 837816.1 but i'm not able to follow it.
Pls,
help with procedure to follow.
Thank you in advance,
Denis

Transaction of item with cost-group 2614 results incost-group comingle

Hi,
I'm working on EBS 11i.
I have setup inv organization and wms is enabled.
When i'm trying to make transactions betwwen suborganizations there is an
error message for some type pf items:
Transaction of item with cost-group 2614 results in cost group comingle.
I see that for some item, in On hand quanitity form are grouped in different cost groups.
There is a way to change the cost group of those items, or to make this cost group disabled.
In this organization I do not care about cost and account. (It is just needed to have physical count of items)
Pls advice how to solve?
Thank you in advance,
Denis

HI,
is not that type of error.
Actually there is no error. the system is working as it should.
I have used different cost groups in subinventories.
I need a way to change the cost group for some of the items.
I found some workaround in article 837816.1 but i'm not able to follow it.
Pls,
help with procedure to follow.
Thank you in advance,
Denis

Network,Assignment,Profit centre N cost Centre field's in CJ20N Transaction

Dear Gurus,
                I need to know the Network, Assignment, Profit Centre and Cost centre fields in the CJ20N transaction.
                I have got a requirement to fetch the above fields for every project. I can find the Project name in table PROJ under the field PSPID and the WBS element in table PRPS under the field POSID.
                Kindly help me out, as the transaction CJ20N is using Structure for the above 4 fields.
               Your suggestions are deeply valuable and are appreciated in advance.
Thankyou,
ZIa

Use FM "'BBP_PS_PROJECT_GET_LIST" to get the complete structure of the Project defined in the txn CJ20N.
Just pass the Project number to this FM and you will get all the details under different Internal Tables.
Execute this FM in SE37 for any of the Existing Project of yours in CJ20N.

Is Costing Model (ECP) Transportable

Team,
I need to create near to 100 forms in CKCM for using in Easy Cost planning. Is the costing models created in CKCM is transportable to production server? While creating I didnt get any transport request and as per BASIS people its a transaction data and cannt be moved to production.
what is the best practice following while using costing model; how the testing and quality check is performed for such forms if we are directly creating it in production.
Thanks in advance
Reg/ Tony

Thanks
Summarizing for future reference
Step 1
Transfer the Characteristics to Target system- Use CT10 to download the Characteristic list and LSMW with object 0150 to upload
Step 2
Use SE38 and CKECP_EXPORT_MODEL in original system and SE38 and CKECP_IMPORT_MODEL in target system
Points to remember
Ensure that all the values are available in target system like Unit of Measurement etc
Ensure the cost element is defined
Ensure the material numbers are same in both systems

Doubt in customizing request with respect to table entries

Hi All,
I have a doubt in customizing request with respect to table entries.
Suppose I have a customizing request with respect to a table that contains say 10 entries in the development system.
Now I am transporting this request to the quality system in which the same table contains 20 entries.
When I am transporting this table from the development system to the quality system, will my 10 entries in the development system get added to the 20 entries in the quality system or will my table get overwritten in the quality system.
What difference will this be if it is a workbench request ? .
Regards,
Sushanth H.S.

Hello,
So if we are transporting contents of a table from one system to another, it should always be a customizing request and not a workbench request right.
If the "Delivery Class" of the table is 'C'(Customizing table, maintenance only by cust., not SAP import) it will ask for a customizing request.
If it is 'A'(Application table (master and transaction data)), it will ask for Workbench.
To add to your previous qn, when you transport the entries to subsequent system it will always check the KEY FIELDS and then update. If you see a transport, then the table entries are represented by their key fields.
If you create new entries in your table and transport, it will add the records. Else it will modify them
Hope i am clear.
BR,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Jan 23, 2009 11:51 AM

Validating Profit Center in CJ20N Transaction

Hi All,
My requirement is to lock the Profit Center field(Make it grayed out) in the project using CJ20n transaction once it is created.
Also when ever the user is trying to change the profit center by entering the project details, it should give an Error message saying that "the profit center value cannot be changed", when trying to save the project details with the new value.
I have tried using almost all the userexits(CNEX0001,CNEX0002,CNEX0003,CNEX0004,CNEX0005,CNEX0006,CNEX0007,CNEX0008,CNEX0038,CNEX0033,CNEX0028,CNEX0029) for the transaction CJ20n and even searched for the BADIs, but none of them was not suitable for my requirement.
Can any body suggest the suitable User exit or a BADI to implement for this requirement.
Thanks

Hello,
Try following....
Use BAdi BUS2054.
In that write an implementation
Two scenarios
1) Creating new project. (Values in PRPS table will get updated after save.)
2) Opening existing project in change mode. ( Already values corresponding to that WBSE are available in PRPS table).
Pre-Requisite:
1) If possible make Profit center field madatory.
Scenario 1:
In Implementation write
At_save
IF PRPS-PRCTR = initial or zero. Then no error. Because he is creating Project, so no values will be available in PRPS. Once he saves PRPS will get updated and from next it will be delt as per scenario 2 below.
Scenario 2:
At_save
If PRPS-PRCTR <> the value entered by the user (i.e. user trying to enter something different which is already there in PRPS table against that WBSE (PRPS-POSID)) throw an error "Profit center can not be changed".
Please try along with ur abaper.
Post ur findings.
Thanks & Regards
Saikishore.Ganga

Doubt in Firing Query with multiple opportunities UUID/IDs

HI Folks!
I might have simple doubt but please help me on this!
1. I have a custom BO with association to opportunities.
[DeploymentUnit(CustomerRelationshipManagement)] businessobject Sy_Trade {
[AlternativeKey] [Label("Trade Id")] element tradeid : BusinessTransactionDocumentID;
node RelatedOpportunities [0,n]{
                              element BusinessTransactionDocumentReference : BusinessTransactionDocumentReference;
                              element BusinessTransactionDocumentRelationshipRoleCode : BusinessTransactionDocumentRelationshipRoleCode;
                               association RelatedOpportunity[0,1] to Opportunity;
2. I have success fully used association and i am able to view create all the opportunities related to my custom Bo.
ISSUE : I want a facet where i just want DISPLAY the activities and sales document assigned in the RELATED OPPORTUNITIES ( N opportunities )
How do i query with Multiple opportunities ID and fetch the activities against it?
Btw I want to use query in UI Designer... I have created an advanced list pane and there i want the result list
I hope i am clear!
Thanks in adavance...
Regards
Dhruvin

Hi Ludger,
I have successfully displayed Related Opportunities associated with trade.( i am able to create , delete also )
Issue : I am not able to "Display" ( i don't need to edit or create ) all the activities created against all the opportunities in a different tab.
I tried to approaches :
1: Query : Created a Query on Activity BO and tried to pass multiple related opportunities ( but seems not possible , please tell me any possibility to pass range of opportunity via transformation or anything? )
2 : binding : I have a Node Related Opportunity so just tried to bind it with BO model but problem is it is displaying all the activities of first opportunity of the list...
i think why because :
In Data model I have created a table bind with Related Opportunities...
now that node is 1 to N , association to opportunity 0 to 1 , hence i think it fetches only 1 opportunities activity
should i create like below ( Or is it possible)
Node Reltdoppts[0,1]
association [0,N] to opportunity BO ?
Although i strongly feel SAP should provied us two things :
1. We need to pass range of opportunities in a query.
2. We need to just write some absl code where i can fill the table and display it
and also is there any possibility to create a report or something to display activities as we just want to display the activities!
P.S : I have been getting a lot of bashing from client because some of the product restriction in cloud! i hope and wish SAP give developers free hand to develop right now its like our hands are tied to many things

Exchange Rate Difference in PO with cost center assignment

Hi All,
In case of exchange rate difference in a PO with a cost center assignment the system Do not post the difference in the exchange rate difference account (maintained under transaction type - KDM - in T-code OBYC). However if the PO is a normal material PO it posts the exchange rate difference to the exchange rate difference account.
I want the exchange rate difference to be posted to the exchange rate difference accout for PO's with cost center assigned as well.
I have searched for SAP notes and found that note # 980402 & 1102481 provides a solution for this issue - but it seems both the notes are valid for 4.6 and 6 release only. We are on ECC 5.0
I have also checked note # 1136145 for this and implemented in the system successfully without any luck.
Can some one please help me with a solution for this issue.
Thanks and regards,
Ankur

Even I have implemented this note in our 4.6C system for account assigned POs, but no luck. Please let me know if are successful.
Thanks
Neel

How to delete Pending WIP Move Transactions with running status

hello,
can any one guide me, how to delete Pending WIP Move Transactions with running status
thanks in advance
sadiq

Please refer to the following note:
Note: 105647.1 - WIP and COST Frequently Used Troubleshooting Scripts
https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=105647.1

Easy Cost Planning: Calculation Row (Business Process) in Cost Model Derivation Rule

Hi All,
The Requirement:
Using the Cost Model I am able to do up to Sub-Total Value. I tried with Calculation Row (Business Process) in the Cost Model Derivation Rule, but could not succeed.
I tried with Base Planning Object, but the formulas are different for other scenarios. Which require 5 to 6 Base Planning Objects are required to be created to get the total amount for a single line item, in the construction project there will be more than 10,000 line items and it is very difficult to maintain the data and also it is time consuming.
Can you suggest me, how to map the requirement?
Best Regards,
K. Rajendra Prasad Rao

You need to check the following for the material cost to appear in network costing:
1. Check whether costing variant is assigned to the network or not.
2. Check whether costing relevancy indicator is checked in material component assigned to the network.
3. If costing variant exists, check the valuation variant and strategy sequence for material valuation.
4. Go to the material master and see whether price is mentioned or not.
I would suggest you to use Network costing, Also note network costing are recorded in Co version '0' so if you have maintained your ECP for '0' version, there is a chance of both the costing getting added up.
Edited by: Ahmed Rifaee on Mar 28, 2010 10:10 PM

Posted a transaction with FBS1 and FB01 of document type AC.

Hi Guru's
It's urgent
I posted a transaction with FBS1 and FB01 of document type AC. What could be the difference between these two transactions.
Regards
Odaiah Pelley

Hi
What's the description of the Doc Type AC
as for info:
FB01 is a normal GL invoice entry for a cost that is incurred as per the posting date specified at the time of entering the invoice
FBS1 - is used for Accrual postings which in acctg terms would be a cost incurred for a long term contract which will be distributed periodically
hope this helps..
Rukshana

Cost Owned Transactions and Cost Derived Transactions

Hi,
Need to Know the details about Cost Owned Transactions and Cost Derived Transactions in 'Periodic Item Cost Change Report'.
Regards,
Abdul Wasi

Hi,
In status control the setting is status of plan and hence the derived transactions will always be generated in planned status and you have to fix them through TPM18.
In order to post it through TBB1 itself, the control setting should have same status option. But check with the business also whether this is not going to have any other effect because this is at the central company code and valuation area level. All derived transactions will have the same status of the operative transactions itself.
Regards,
Ravi

DOubt in CJ20N Transaction with Costing Model

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for