Doubts : SLD in Production System.

I have 2 SLD's in my Landscape.
1. SLD on solution Manager : DEV-SLD and QAS-SLD ( Both SLD on Same solution Manger as Cenetrlise SLD Option).
2. SLD on Production PI System( Local SLD ) : This SLD we are using in term of Production PI System.
Question : -
Q-1. Now for Tranport Objects from Solman SLD( D and Q) to PRD SLD........ We need to Set Transport targets in Solution manager SLD?????
If yes is the my next question would be :------
Q-2 That means will I have to register PI PRD System as integration Server in Solution manager also ??????????
after this Solution Manager has 3 Integration Server ( Dev IS(mailnly) , Qas IS(mainly) , Prd IS) ???????????????????????
Q-3 Similarly Will have to register DEV PI and Q PI syetm in Production Local SLD ??????????????????
similary on PI PRD Local SLD has 3 Integration Server ( Prd IS(mainly) , Dev IS , Qas IS ) ???????????????????????
Regards
P.S

Hi Prabhat,
Q 1 : Now for Tranport Objects from Solman SLD( D and Q) to PRD SLD........ We need to Set Transport targets in Solution manager SLD?????
Ans: Yes
Q 2 : That means will I have to register PI PRD System as integration Server in Solution manager also ?
after this Solution Manager has 3 Integration Server ( Dev IS(mailnly) , Qas IS(mainly) , Prd IS) ?
Ans: Yes
Q 3: Similarly Will have to register DEV PI and Q PI syetm in Production Local SLD ?
similary on PI PRD Local SLD has 3 Integration Server ( Prd IS(mainly) , Dev IS , Qas IS )?
Ans: Yes
Thanks,

Similar Messages

Protect Production Systems from Local SLD installations

If we have several developers in our organization with Local Development Workstations (meaning they installed a local copy of WAS 6.40, MaxDb, Portal) how do we prevent those developers from setting up there local SLD to connect to Production Systems. If they set up a production system in the local SLD they will be able to configure their "adaptive rfc webdynpros" to connect to the production system with the jco connections in the Webdynpro Content Administrator. Is the only control point their id they would enter when configuring the jco connection?

YOu need the authorization for login in SLD as admin
Follow this link for compete details:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9e76e511-0d01-0010-5c9d-9f768d644808
Are there any impacts/differences between exporting/importing and creating the systems manually? For example if I cannot export the systems would it be ok if I created them again in the production SLD?
No differeence...it's just increase the work you have to do in SLD...but the important thing here is when you move the tranports of the SLD BS from DEV to Production you have to maintin the same name as you have maintained in the trnsport targets in the DEV......your ID tranport to Production is dependedn on what is the BS name you are mentinog of production in the transports targets.

Role not displayed in Production system

Dear all,
I have CUA set up (CUA is configured in solution manager), and I assigned 10 roles to a user in solution manager using SU01 and selected Production system while assigning roles and the roles were already existing in production system.but after role assignment to the user, I verified in Production system and I found that they are not reflecting in PROD. Infact, I have done user comparision but still no change.
Please let me know do I need execute SCUL by selecting the User ID.
If yes please let me know the steps to execute SCUL.
Your help is much appreciated!
Many thanks
Anil.

Hi,
Please go to the Transaction SCUL, and give the user id and the system as the prodution system ID (eg. PRD100). By default the Error, Warnings and Unconfirmed Distribution will be already checked. Do not change them and then click on Execute.
If you receive the message saying No Data, then it means that the IDOCs for that user were successfully pushed from CUA to the production system.
But, since the change was not reflected, when you execute, you will be able to see the status where the IDOC is struck. Expand the tree and see the nature of the error, and try to resolve that error. And then select the entire tree and click on the Distribute button.
It will give you a pop up, let all the checkboxes as it is, and continue. After the distribution is triggered, you will get a message in SCUL.
Refresh the SCUL data, and you should be able to see the current status of the distribution.
If all the data is cleared in SCUL, you can log into your produciton system adn check the users roles. New role should be visible there.
I hope this will clear your doubt. Let me know if you have any questions on this.
Regards,
Sneha Vyas.

Early Delta Initialization option in Production system

Hi Experts,
I have seen some threads related to Early Delta initialization in this forum. I have a question regarding this option.
To minimize the downtime/block users in the R/3 production system during set up tables fillup I would like to use the Early delta option. Please give your suggestions on the following procedure:
For Sales Orders, billing and Deliveries
1. Initialize Early delta in the BI system.
2. Go and fill setup tables
3. Do a full load to BI
4. Run delta job in R/3 (LBWE)
5. Run delta job in BI Info package
Do we miss any documents in this process for e.g. during set up tables fill up changes to existing documents or newly created sales orders.
I feel we won't miss. All changes will be reflected in Delta queue. And even newly created orders also will be coming to delta queue.
Please let me know if I am wrong.
Thank you.

Need Clarification on this thread,
According to my understanding, during the filling of set up table if a user does any posting, then the data available in BW will be incorrect.
am i right?
In your sequence the 4th step
4. Run delta job in R/3 (LBWE), this means you are using queued or unseriallized v3 update.
Early delta iniliazation essentially of no advantage because, as conventional initialization procedures, you can readmit document
postings after successfully filling the setup tables.
can anybody clear my doubt. is it possible during setup table filling user can post a document.
I know the documents will be collected in the queue. But the data loaded to bw will be incorrect right?
Regards,
Anand.
Edited by: araj123 on May 26, 2010 11:41 AM

Modify Query in Production System !

Hello SDN s,
How ya all ?
We want to Modify a Query by inserting one more InfoObject in the Production System. When we try to Drag & Drop the InfoObject from the Dimension to the Free Characteristics it showed blocked symbol and hence we are unable to modify the Query.
We do have to Query in the Development but cannot use that for Transport as it holds another Query Structure which is used by another Production System.
Could anyone suggest us how to modify the Query ?
Will there be any authorization to maintain for the user ?
Best Regards....
Sankar Kumar
+91 98403 47141

Hello Murali,
Could u list down what are all the Authorizations we have to maintain and where it has to be maintained, in SU01 or some other Transaction ?
Hello Srini,
I got this doubt earlier and checked the entire content, the object is not there.
Hello Edwin Harpino(A.H.P),
I will try this and come back with the result !

SLD Configuration - Technical System and Business System

Hello,
I have installed SAP Solution Manager with local SLD and i want to use this system as Central SLD for my System Landscape. Later on i have installed other SAP Products like ECC,BI,PI etc.
Some of the systems i registered with previously defined SLD in Solution Manager, but some system i forgot to register with SLD during installation.
I am not sure or aware what is the difference between SLD configuration during installation and after installation.
If i have Register the System during installation will it register automatically with SLD or we have to do manually.
If i have not register system during installation and later on i want to register particular system with SLD what is procedure for that.
Can some one share knowledge on What is Technical Systems and Business System in SLD Configuration, i tried to do some activity for SLD Configuration but after seeing above both terms i was confused so for time being i stopped this activity.
Looking forward for kind response.
Best Regards,
V.Singh

Hello
try to go through these
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwesrce/helpdata/en/45/4208934d7f1193e10000000a1553f7/content.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/652b1f46-0a01-0010-25ae-e7cb07b55414

Solman 7.1 SP10 delete product system in SMSY

Hi,
Somehow in my Solman 7.1 sp10 a product system is in SMSY and not in LMDB but in this SP I´m unable to delete it using SMSY and as the product system is not in LMDB, I don´t find how to do it.
Anyone knows how to delete it.
Regards,

Hi Vevek,
If it's not associated with LMDB and the data source is SLD or TMS/RFC and the date and time stamp is out-dated, then you can delete the product system in SMSY by switching to Edit mode. If the data source is LMDB, then it needs to be done via LMDB. I hope that helps to address the issue. If not please open a message with SV-SMG-SYS.
Regards,
Jay Soma.

Index value maintenance directly in a Production system

Hi,
Is it possible to control the access to T-code: REAJINDX ( Index value maintenance) by Authorization Management (Profile Generator/Role management) in a closed system (Production) for configuration?
Authorization Object: S_TABU_NAM
Activity: 02
Table: V_REAJINDXCLASS
The requirement is the Index value maintenance directly in a Production system (closed system for the configuration) through the Authorizacion Management.
Thanks and best regards,
Fernando

Hi Franz,
First, thanks for your quick response. I haven´t got to solve the problem with these notes. I would like to explain in further detail the issue and the current system configuration.
The configuration for the Client (T000) is the following:
Client Role: T (Test) or P (Production)
Changes and Transport for Client-Specific objects: No Changes Allowed
Cross-Client Objects changes: 3-No Changes to Repository and Cross-Client Customizing objects
The configuration for the object VC_REAJINDX (SOBJ) is the following:
Category: CUST
Transport: 2-Automatic Transport
Adjustment: Automatically adjustable
Current Settings: Marked
With this configuration at client level and for this object, it is not possible to maintain the Index values in the target client. Then my question (doubt) is if it´s possible to maintain the index values in despite of this configuration by Authorization management (User roles/Profile Generator) for this object (Example: Give authorization to modify this object (in order to maintain the values) to a Key User with a specific role, SU01). Or if it´s not possible, then It´s necessary to change the configuration for the object (VC_REAJINDX) for the fields, Category, or/and Transport,... For this option, it´s necessary to modify the SAP standard using a Developer key and I´m not sure if it is a recommended solution.
But my client wants to maintain the index values directly from PRD system and not from a DEV system and after transport the updates to PRD.
On the other hand, the error message that the system shows it isn´t the message number TK430, It is the message nº SV052, No maintenance authorization for requested data (Diagnosis: You have attempted, in change mode, to access data for which you have no authorization.). This is the reason I think, maybe, it is possible to control it through the Authorization management.
Thanks in advance and best regards,
Fernando

Activate BI Business Content in production system

Hi experts
I have a doubt, someone activated business content in production system, what are the consecuences in the future?
Are there any procedure to follow to activate business content from developement system and then to transport to QAS and PRS?
Edited by: José Jaramillo Padrón on Dec 15, 2008 11:32 PM

Hi
what are the consecuences in the future?
Yes Its not advisable to activate the Business Content in Production server, because all the final Reporting Data will be fetched for the users from the same Production server and we should keep the system ready and available for all the time for the data loading and reporting.
If you are engaging the the system in activating the BC (hope you know that BC activation takes time and while activating it will lock all the dependent objects involved in it)
Are there any procedure to follow to activate business content from developement system and then to transport to QAS and PRS?
BC should be activated from Dev then Transport it to Quality testing activities user acceptance then transport finally to PRS.
Hope you know the steps for activating BC or else http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw31/helpdata/en/80/1a66d5e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Hope it helps

Lock on Portion and MRU in Production System

Can anyone explain why is there a lock on MRU and Portion in the production system but not in development? Can it be removed?

Hi Kunal,
The lock will appear in production system only as the standard logic checks for production client before showing up the lock.
============================
CHECK g_clnt_prod = 'P'.
============================
Lock Icon on Portion:
Following two FMs are used to determine whether the locked icon is to be displayed or not
ISU_DB_EVER_FIND_CONT_FOR_PORT,
ISU_DB_TE422_FIND_MRU_FOR_PORT
Simply put forward, if portion is being used for an ISU contract(EVER) or is associated with any MRU(TE422) lock icon will be displayed.
Lock Icon on MRU
It check in table EANLH(Install.Time Slice) with the following condition bis >= sy-datum AND ableinh = te422-termschl.If record is found, then the lock icon is displayed.
Simply put forward, if MRU is being used up in any ISU installation as on system date, the MRU lock will be displayed.
About, removing the icons, it checks for business function ISU_UTIL_1 to be active for the system. If not, the lock is not displayed in production environment .
I hope, this clarifies you doubt.
Thanks,
Ritesh

How to transport the connection in production system

hi
I have a doubt releaated to connection between SAP BI and Xcelsius.
We have a development server on which i have created universe and then on it Qaaws and finally Xcelsius dashboard.
My doubt is in future they will transport the SAP BI system from Development system to Production system.
In this case Universe ,Qaaws,Xcelsius will work?
will i have to develop this again in production system, or any how it will work with production system?
How excetly development work here when we have connection between SAP BI and Xcelsius in different system from development to quality and then in Production?
Thanks,
Piyush

Hi
assuming that the objects (keyfigures, characteristics, multiprovider) of the underlying query are available in your production system you do not have to create your universe again, rather change the connection data to your SAP server (like SYSID, client number etc) in the universe connection.
Additionally if you are working ith BO XI 3.1 I would suggest to take a look to the LifeCycleManager, a tool which can simplify the transport process from your development to your production environment.
Regards,
Stratos

SLD- Same business System

Hi,
I have an APO system which has developement and production only.
We had developed an interface via PI where PI environments are in Dev/QA/Regression and Production.
Our SLD is shared between DEV/QA/Regression and separeate SLD in Production.
I am getting transport error between Dev and QA since it was not able to find a obligatory transport target.
I managed to download the same business system used in Dev for QA, but still the transport is giving error.
The business system is of ABAP type. Let me know how to deal with this.
Regards
Sam

Hello Sam,
in theory you're right, but this is not possible in SLD. Every Business System can only be assigned to exactly one environment (if I recall correctly it is a dropdown menu), so you cannot map it on itself. For each transport to a different environment you'll have to assign a different BS. So either you work with dummies or you leave out one transport, I don't think you have many other options.
One other option I have seen is two clients on the ABAP DEV system where one of them would serve as test/dev client and the other one as QAS client.
A different option would be to work with Business/Communication Components and avoid this transport rules. But since you use an ABAP system this is not the recommended procedure.
Regards,
Jörg

How to remove Production System from Solution manager.

Hi All,
We have Three system landscape and solution manager installed.
All the system are managed by Solution manager.
here we are looking to remove the Production System from Solution manager.
as in case if is there any problem in solution manager then we are not dependent on it.
things will work directly on Production system.
Could you please let us know the procedure to remove the system from solution manager.
Please let us know if is there any document provided by SAP.

Hi,
Have you implemented charm,ccms monitoring or any other functionalities?
if yes,.Delete the sytem from tms domain. and TR route needs to be adjusted, if you are using ccms, remove the agent details from RZ21 also.
Does your production system data coming from SLD?
if yes, Delete the entry from SLD
if both the answer is no.
1.delete RFC from SOLMAN to the production systems.
2. delete the production system using SMT2 transaction.
3. Remove system rom SMSY from SOLMAN.
Thanks,
Jansi

Solman 7.1 LVSM Product system has no technical system assigned

Hi All,
As reference of blog #sapadmin:: How to assign Product System in SOLMAN 7.1 & How LMDB, SLD, SMSY and Landscape Verification work in SOLMAN7.1SAPNetworkWeblogs%2528SAPNetworkWeblogs%2529
I have created product instance from LSVM and now I have problem to add "product system" for Enterprise portal (using NW 7.3) to the landscape, as its throw me an error "Product system has no technical system assigned".
From the display help its mentioned:
*Diagnosis*
Product system is not assigned a technical system in the system landscape of the Solution Manager.
*System Response*
Since the system landscape of the Solution Manager forms the basis for working with SAP Solution Manager, if your product systems are incorrectly assigned, many important functions are not available to you, or are only available on a restricted basis.
*Procedure*
Assign one or more technical systems to your product system . SAP recommends that you use the corresponding wizard of the Landscape Verification Tool. To start the wizard, choose the button Change Technical System Assignments next to the message. The user interface of the wizard contains detailed information about its usage.
I'm not sure with sentence of Assign one or more technical systems to your product system and which wizard are this referring to ?
I have also checked from the wiki:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SMSETUP/MaintenanceofProductintheSystemLandscape#MaintenanceofProductintheSystemLandscape-EnterprisePortal
And its only supported for NW 7.0 not 7.3.
Is there anyone had this issues ?
It's feels like I'm the only one stuck in this.
Thanks in advanced.
Raff

Hi Sunny,
Many thanks for your reply.
I have followed the guide you mentioned, now I can see 2 EPD Error from LVSM.
1. Product system EPD has no technical system assigned (new)
2. Technical system EPD is not assigned to a product system
For number 1. if I clicked on Change Technical System Assignments I can see EPD there, but when I want to add the EPD by clicking > I've got this error message " Newly linked technical system EPD has already been locked by user" I've tried to remove the lock from sm12 but nothing happen.
For number 2. if I clicked on Change Product System Assignments, there is an error messages "Technical system EPD was updated in parallel session"
I believe the number 1. coming because I create it from SMSY, but the number 2. is still there in the first place.
Cheers,
Raff

SM30/SM31 and SE16 access in Production systems - Confusion

Hi Security Experts,
Could any one give some information why SE16 or Sm30/SM31 access should not be granted directly in production systems even if its for a custom tables which are assigned to authorisation groups?
I have been going through lot of forums where every one says access to tcodes should be restricted or access need to provided in alternate way but i could not see the clear information on why this is should not be granted?
I can think of risk providing to standard table authorisation groups but i don't understand the reason why custom table access via SM30/Sm31/Se16 should be restricted?
Could any one explain the implications of granting the access directly, if possible please provide information from audit point of view.
In our company there are many users who have got access to SM30/Sm31 to maintain z* tables which are assigned to authorisation groups, is this a security risk?
Please shed some light on this. Your information is much helpful in clearing my doubts and is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Sandhya

What you should also consider is that S_TABU_RFC lets you remotely turn the S_TABU_DIS checks off for specific tables if you create a view to them.
It means that the calling application has taken care of the security before the call and the application user authorizations are correct and the view is correctly designed.
Normally display activity in the debuger (s_develop actvt 03 object type DEBUG) is sufficient in the remote system to see everything in the target system - depending on the authorizations of the technical SYSTEM or COMMUNICATION user. These should ideally not access tables directly.
For table / view comparisons you can use a "current user" destination (or use trusted RFC).
It is unrealistic to restrict users to trouble shoot local problems, so you should ideally implement only the business scenarios for the RFC steps and those should be BAPI application type and not direct table access or generic interfaces to run programs, perform subroutines, install programs, etc.
It is quite easy (with lots of time) to build a catalog of access from the (remote) application to datavia APIs, but you must first get away from the direct table access and control the client access to the generic functions and transactions.
SE16 / Sm30 and many reports and function modules which can very easily be started by adventurous users which offer exactly that.
If the users are doing axactly that then from a security administrator perspective you can only try to restrict it and process "tickets" all day long...
Cheers,
Julius
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Oct 2, 2011 9:12 PM

Doubts : SLD in Production System.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for