How AP Down Payment value should reflect in BP Master GL with Gross Value

Hi All,
Its URGENT, please help me with possilbe solution for,
Scenario:- Need to make an advance payment to the vendor and the same amount need to deduct from the vendor invoice, but it should reflect in the Vendors account as a gross value like as a total material cost.
eg:-
AP down payment invoice request for Rs.12000/-and out going payment for the same. While posting AP invoice for 14000/-and need to adjusted Rs.12000/- as advance from the invoice.Now the vendor GL account will show the balance against this invoice is Rs.2000/- as credit.But it should show the invoice value in BP master GL as gross ie. Rs.14000/-
Im Using SAP B1
For further Clarification please contact:- Andrews - 9880208304 or Rohan - 9902294962
Regards,
Andrews.T.A

HI
MOVE THE SPL GL AMOUNT ie 12000 to normal gl then it iwll reflect in BP master gl also....
see the the down payment are recorded in other gl and the invoice are recorded in other gl..
using f.54 u have to move the spl gl to normal gl then the entry will be passed
by debiting the BP master
and crediting the advance gl
then u you can match and make the payment also..
and also check the config on the down payment how the account are mapped
regarads
A.K

Similar Messages

How appropriate down payment AuC using F110 transaction?

Hello, I have a problem to appropriate down payment for "AuC" using F110 tcode:
We work with CJ20N> Project Builder> WBS Element> Network> activity> Purchase Requisition.
With the transaction ME21N> creation of the Purchase Order with reference to the Purchase Requisition.
With the purchase order placed, we are committed to the project equal to the value of the purchase order.
With the F-47 created a request for "down payment" and the F-48 or F110 consolidated the "down payment " and does not change the value committed in the "WBS element ". That's right..
The Value of the down payment is appropriate when the WBS element is filled in the field "WBS Element" (F-47 Tcode) and ran the F-48 tcode with reference to the doc's F-47.
In F110 tcode (created as a reference to the doc's new F-47) do not have field to fill the WBS element, which carries an appropriation of the down payment to "Network Object" which is assigned to the Purchase Order.
When the CJ88 is executed (if the F-48 is used), the costs are appropriate to the AUC correctly.
If the CJ88 is performed (when the F110 is used) can not appropriate the value of "down payment" to the AUC.
We need the same functionality as the F-48 T Code in Tcode F110 once the scenario where our clients do not want to use the F-48.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks for your attention.
Vitti
SAP Consultant IM_PS
Edited by: deraldo ricieri vitti on Mar 29, 2011 8:04 PM
Edited by: deraldo ricieri vitti on Mar 29, 2011 8:09 PM

This is very much possible.
But need some config. changes
Please go to FBZP
Select all company codes tab
Select your Company code and double click it.
Here under Vendor tab you have to enter all the special GL indicators whatever possible for your transactions.
Now come to F110 screen, under free selection tab through document you can select special GL indicators.
Here you have to give sp. GL indicator which you have used in your F-47 screen for your AUC accounts.
A/C entry would be
Vendor a/c Dr(GL-Down payment made to assets through Sp. GL Indicator)
Bank a/c Cr
Rgds
Murali. N

How can i do with labview program,when i have 20 different values,and 1 want to add it with constant value.and how to get the results?

how can i do with labview program,when i have 20 different values,and 1 want to add it with constant value.and how to get the results?

Why do the 20 values have to be different? The same code should work even if some are equal.
What do you mean by "get the result"? The result is available at the output terminal and all you need is a wire to get it where you need it. That could be an indicator, another operation, or even a hardware device.
What is the data type of the 20 values? An array? A cluster? A bunch of scalars? A waveform? Dynamic data?
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

Mass changes of Material Master field with different values

Hi,
How to change a field in Material Master for more than thousand materials. I think MM17 can only be used for mass changes of materials with same values. I need to upload different values for different materials. Is there any other way to do this.
Thanks,
K R Vishnu Kumar

Hi Kumar.
I think you have to use LSMW for mass updation for Material Master fields with different values.
Regards,
Rahul.

Down Payment entries not reflecting in J1INMIS report

Dear Guru's,
TDS deducted at the time of down payment made to vendor is not reflecting in J1inmis report.
Is J1INMIS report does not reflect down payment entries?
What will be the reason for this?
Which alternative report to followed for J1INMIS !!!
Waiting for your positive reply.
Regards,
Sany.

Hi Sany,
To update Business Place & Section Code, execute the program given below. After execution of the program run T.Code J1INPP and your issue should get resolved. Let me know if this works.
Ask the Abaper to write the following Code & execute the program:
REPORT ZFI_BUP_SEC_CHANGE.
TABLES : BSIK,BSAK,BSEG.
parameters: PA_BELNR TYPE BSEG-BELNR OBLIGATORY,
            PA_BUKRS TYPE BSEG-BUKRS OBLIGATORY,
            PA_GAAHR TYPE BSEG-GJAHR OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETERS : PA_BUPLA TYPE BSEG-BUPLA NO-DISPLAY,
             PA_SECCO TYPE BSEG-SECCO NO-DISPLAY.
PA_BUPLA = 'MUM'.                               (Note : Use the Business place & section Code Used
PA_SECCO = 'MUM'.                                         in your company code).
START-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM CHANGE_DATA.
END-OF-SELECTION.
*&      Form CHANGE_DATA
      text
--> p1        text
<-- p2        text
FORM CHANGE_DATA .
DATA : LT_BSEG TYPE TABLE OF BSEG WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSIK TYPE TABLE OF BSIK WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSAK TYPE TABLE OF BSAK WITH HEADER LINE.
BSeg updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSEG
FROM BSEG
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSEG.
IF LT_BSEG-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSEG-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSEG-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSEG FROM LT_BSEG.
    Write : / LT_BSEG-BELNR, 'Update For BSEG', LT_BSEG-BSCHL,
              LT_BSEG-BUPLA,LT_BSEG-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Bsik updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSIK
FROM BSIK
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSIK.
IF LT_BSIK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSIK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSIK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSIK FROM LT_BSIK.
    Write : / LT_BSIK-BELNR, 'Update For BSIK', LT_BSIK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSIK-BUPLA,LT_BSIK-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
BsAk updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSAK
FROM BSAK
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSAK.
IF LT_BSAK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSAK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSAK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSAK FROM LT_BSAK.
    Write : / LT_BSAK-BELNR, 'Update For BSAK', LT_BSAK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSAK-BUPLA,LT_BSAK-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.                    " CHANGE_DATA
Thank You.

Down Payment Request not reflecting as a 2nd Item in Invoice

Dear All,
I have created a Sales Order of 10000 USD (Sales Order contains Milestone Billing Plan). I have created a Down Payment Request ZFAZ of 3000 USD. When I am creating a next Invoice in Billing Plan the Down Payment Request i created is not coming as a second Line Item so that it has to be off-set. I have checked all configurations in Copy Control.
Could you tell me what exactly is the Issue.
Thanks,
Parag.

Hi Parag
If the downpayment process is fully configured and a downpayment is booked and cleared
using transaction F-29 then the downpayment should be found in VF01 when the first 'real' invoice
is created. For this to work the downpayment document (FAZ) need copy routine 020 in place
and the 'real' billing documents need to have routine 023 in place.
When creating a 'real' invoice the system calls function module SD_DOWNPAYMENT_READ
and it reads the FI tables BSID/BSAD and retrieves the downpayment posted in F-29.
If SD_DOWNPAYMENT_READ gets called and doesn't find a downpayment line
then something is wrong with the FI posting (was it posted in F-29, are VBEL2 & POSN2 filled ?)
If SD_DOWNPAYMENT_READ doesn't get called in VF01 sometihng is wrong with your SD
customising. Do you have routine 023 in place.
Check your case again and let us know how you get on
Kind regards
Brian

How does Down payments against sales orders work?

Hi Gurus,
Can anyone explain me How Down payment against sales orders work? Please give step by step details with configuration.
Regards,
partha
[email protected]

Hi Partha,
This link will take you to the document that will give you an idea about "Down Payments against Sales order"
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/dd/561621545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
Hope it helps.
Regards
Ayub Khan
Please reward points if helpful

Payment Terms should come from vendor master data

When we create a new contract (ME31K) Z0NQ for the vendor XYZ by default the payment terms that the contract retrieve is 1131, but in master data (XK03) for vendor XYZ I have payment terms 1011 defined.
I already checked it in Purchase organization and CCode level.
Please advise. Thanks!

It should come from vendor master only butmake sure that you are creating cintract based onthe RFQ or some use exit is avtive for that.

Screen Field Value Should be changed based on changes in ALV values

Hi All,
We had created a ALV with container, in this Alv we have a checkbox, which is editable.
Based on the selection on checkbox , we need to update a field "Total selected" on screen.
we are using Event to handle data changed in ALV, but some how it doesn't work.
we even tried to use 'DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE' Function module to Update the field.
Please find the code below.
LOOP AT gt_final INTO gw_final WHERE mark EQ 'X'.
          gv_sel = gv_sel + 1.
ENDLOOP.
        lw_dynpfields-fieldname = 'GV_SEL'.
        lw_dynpfields-fieldvalue = gv_sel .
        APPEND lw_dynpfields TO lt_dynpfields.
        CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE'
          EXPORTING
            dyname               = 'Z_MAINPROG'
            dynumb               = '0300'
          TABLES
            dynpfields           = lt_dynpfields
          EXCEPTIONS
            invalid_abapworkarea = 1
            invalid_dynprofield = 2
            invalid_dynproname   = 3
            invalid_dynpronummer = 4
            invalid_request      = 5
            no_fielddescription = 6
            undefind_error       = 7
            OTHERS               = 8.
        IF sy-subrc <> 0.
          MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
                  WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
        ENDIF.
We get Sy-subrc as 0. No error and no update.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ravi

Do you flush to synchronize the itab from frontend?
In Debugger, is the column updated via 'X' for the checkboxes?
please insert cl_gui_cfw=>flush. to sync in PAI before analyzing the table.
Regards,
Christian

This is how the X-Fi soundcard should work. Ican do it with 2 soundcar

Hi There. For?some new X-Fi drivers and software I have a suggestion that would be awsome. First though, let me explain what I'm doing. I have 2 souncards. the first is an X-Fi Extreme music which is set as the primary soundcard. This souncard is patched into the inputs of an inca88, 8 input 8 output Studio card. the inca88 is running with Sonar 6 PE (recording software) which allows me to apply?DXI and VST effects to all the channels, create custom routing of sound from each channel to the subwoofer and even apply a Compressor/limiter to prevent overload. I use multiband parametric EQs for each channel and can set exact crossover slopes to all speaker outputs. I use it for gaming, HTPC, and as a home recording studio and it has very minimal hit on my CPU. The XP software for the X-Fi has a very limited audio creation mode which allows some very basic effects to be used with just an X-Fi. However the ability to use of DXIs and VST within the creative Audio Creation mode would mean that third party effects can be used to produce truly amazing results. This stuff is entirely possible to do so if you want the above functionality then ask Creative for it. Regards,?Thunderknob? :?)?

We're talking about Creative here who can barely get a decent driver out after 6 months... :/

Multi-value parameter report - error : Incorrect syntax near ',' with multi-valued parameter in SSRS

Hey,
I created a report in Reporting Services where I added multi-value parameter
( Filter). When I run my report, and try to select more than one parameter, I get an error: Incorrect syntax near ','
then i put in parameter expression : join(Parameters!Filter.Value,",")
and add : dbo.ufnSplit before calling parameter in query :
>>> set @valwhere = 'table.field IN (select * from dbo.ufnSplit(' + @Filter + ' , '',''))'
but i still have errors : incorrect syntax near 'text' which is the second value of the picklist of the parameter,
Please Any idea ?
Thanks !!

I have sometimes had to collate as default with the SQL query
currently I've just using
CompanyName in
(selectitemfromdbo.fnSplit(@function,','))
In the SSRS report text box I have Join(Parameters!Company.Value,",")

Should project down payment value settle to AUC

Dear all
i have two questions when settle the project to AUC
for example, the material cost for project A-01 in Dec is 2000 CNY
and down payment for project A-01 in Dec is 1000CNY
when i do the project settlement for Dec, the AUC value is 3000CNY
that is the total of material cost and down payment.
but i want to exclude the down payment value from AUC value when doing the settlement, how can i do?
the second question is, when i test run the settlement and check the sender,
i find the sender is 3000CNY with materil cost element for example 600900
but actually, it is not correct.
i created the cost element for down payment, but i can not see the line item.
how should i do? thanks a lot.
judy

the down payment ideally should be a financial transction and should not be a debit on the project
so ideally your material cost of 200 CNY should be transferred to AuC on settlement
if you are using the WBS to debit then I wiuld suggest that you use PREliminary settlement - add a settlement rule PRE to G/L account - the account for down payment - you will need to set up the source structure and add that in the settlement rue
This way 1000 CNY goes to G/L and the rest to AuC

Down payment - Final Billing (F2) has value zero

Dear SD Gurus,
For down payment, I have set up the necessary steps with ref to SAP help file.
1. Condition type AZWR in the pricing procedure with requirement as 2 (item with pricing) and the calculation formula 48
2. Copy control set up for Order type TA with billing type FAZ for the item category TAO with Copying requirement 20
3. Copy control set up for Order type TA with billing type F2 for the item category TAO with Copying
Below is the detail:
AZWR - $10,000
Date Percentage Bill Value Bill Type
04.03.2008 10% 1000 FAZ
20.03.2008 40% 4000 F2
30.03.2008 60% 6000 F2
Questions:
1) After F-29 and F-39, the Account Doc still showing "not cleared". Any idea why?
2) I created the final 2 invoices for F2 (from VF04) but both didn't have any value. Any idea why?
3) Do I need to maintain selling price PR00(standard selling price)??
Any clue is very much appreciated.
Thanks,
SooKK

Hi Srinath,
Thanks for your reply.
For PR00, if I maintain it, it will add up to the total net value in my order.
PR00   $10,000
AZWR $1,000 (it is a surcharge & fixed amount condition type. So, it will automatically add up to the net value).
Hence, the total net value will become $11,000 but the net value is the sales order is supposed to be $10,000.
And, at the billing plan:
Date             Per%     Bill Value
06.03.2008     10        1,100     --> 10% from 11,000.
20.03.2008     40        4,400     --> 40% from 11,000.
30.03.2008     60        6,600     --> 60% from 11,000.
I'm following exactly the processes recommended my SAP Help file but not sure if it is correctly set up.
If AZWR supposedly to be part of 10,000? Or it should be added up on top of net value??
If the above set up is wrong, this makes me wondering if AZWR is placed at the rite sequence in the pricing procedure. At the moment, I'm testing with standard pricing procedure RVA001 and AZWR is placed before MWST. FYI, I'm using ERL as the account key for AZWR.
Please advice.
Best Regards,
SooKK

Down payments added to the net value

Hello Experts,
I have configured downpaymants as per my client requirement . I have entered manually the down payment condition type in the sales order but the down payment value has added to the net value. Is it standard system behaviour or please explain how the down payments behave while creating the sales order.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
K
Edited by: kv on Jun 2, 2010 11:43 AM

Hi Folk,
Can you make the condition type as negative sign and test it again.
Regards,
Ram.

Down Payment FAZ Document Posting using AZWR

For configuration of Downpayment for Milestone Billing. We have made
use of Condition Type 'AZWR'. This works fine as long as it is above
the VAT (TAX) Condition Type in the Pricing Procedure. The invoicing
Process in SAP involves Milestone billing with - 10% Advance Amount
(Downpayment) and rest Pro-Rata (%age wise) billing.
In case of Invoicing against a Material, VAT Condition Type is picked
up and AZWR has been configured just above the VAT (TAX) condition type
in the pricing procedure. This works fine when we create FAZ request
through Milestone Billing and the subsequent request in then posted
through F-29.
But with Billing against a Service there are three tax condition types
viz. for SERVICE TAX, for EDU.CESS and for HIGHER EDU.CESS. In this
case too we have configured AZWR just above the three tax condition
types. Now, while creating a FAZ downpayment request. The system picks
up the Tax Amount only for the last tax condition type i.e. (HIGHER
EDU.CESS) in this case. Thus, for example if for the contract value of
Rs.1000. We have 10% as advance, thus, we have - 90.66 as net value and
Rs.9.34 (9.07 as ST + 0.18 as Edu Cess + 0.09 Higher EDU.Cess)as Tax
in the FAZ Request.
The accounting document generated upon saving shows only 90.66 as Net
Value + 0.09 as Tax with the relevant tax code for Higher Edu. Cess
Condition. The rest of the tax conditions are not picked up. Because of
this, during F-29 posting only 1 line item of Tax Amount Rs.0.09 is
picked up with the relevant tax-code, and rest of the taxes are not. We
need all the tax conditions to be posted during FAZ so that the due
ADVANCE AMOUNT IS POSTED.

hi Imran
1. Did AZWR is remain statistical or required some GL.?
now this condition type is just for a request for a down payment so there is no reqd for a GL...coz i am doing the same thing here...but as
if now i still face issues on this also and in the billing FAZ type you could see tat the condition base value is shown as the down payment
like as the item billing plan tab page for the down payments...like for eg 10% of the net value ...
2. I take the down payment with FAZ type and post the incoming payment, than how can I post the actual billing (F2)??
well in this is true i do also have the same issue ...f-39 take the downpayments in but does not reflect . but to that i waud also like to
add this if you go to the sales order billing plan tab page of the item and there you got to choose the final invice, just like the downpayments is shown ...then the billing amount will come ...just try it and in the VF01 it will appear as billing FAZ with the downpayment
amount and the F2 also ....but the F2 is delivery related so i think you got to do PGI after the downpayments process then do f2...
if you get more info on that please explian
3. There is no update after the down payment agains the condition type AZWR, did it will manually entered, or what is the bahavior of this.
sorry i hav no info on this
5. Should I create a different pricing procedure with AZWR or what ????
not reqd. coz in the existing pricing procedure you need to have a subtotal after that AZWR
IT WUD BE REALLY KIND OF YOU TO SHARE ANY NEW UPDATES PLEASE
REGARDS

How AP Down Payment value should reflect in BP Master GL with Gross Value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for