Employee resposnsibles Org unit Determination (Employee is assigned to Org Unit)

Hi ,
We want to determine Org unit based on employee responsible but not on basis of USER.
Employee responsible will be assigned to a particular position in Organization .
We want to determine Organization unit where Employee is assigned .
When in transaction Partner Function employee responsible is selected then Organization unit to which employee is assigned should get determined.
When employee resposnsible is changed Org unit (Service ) should change .
Please suggest solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Anup Reche

Hi
first u need to do the filter settings in object BUPA_MAIN to stop the employee replication to R3.
When u create the no. ranges in r3 u can remove the filter so that the process will continue.
Regards
Manohar

Similar Messages

E-Recruiting Employee Searches (Assigning an employee to a support group)

Hello experts,
I have run into a situation where when attempting to search for an employee to assign to a support team using their first and last name nothing returns. However if I try to search for them using their personnel number they come up just fine. NOTE: This is only happening with this employee.
Any idea why this may be happening? We are on 6.0 sp10 using BSP. We also have E-Recruiting seperate from our SAP HR system and are using ALE to transfer data over to E-Recruiting.
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks!
Ryan
Edited by: Ryan Hubbell on Nov 8, 2008 1:09 AM

Hello Ryan,
the search for positions in the requisition maintanence was changed quite a while ago. Even SAP finally agreed that if you start the hiring process for a new position open in 3 months it should be possible to assign it to the requisition even if the position is currently not active. If you are not on a very old support level you should not face this problem anymore.
The possiblitiy to find the name for the employee id even if the employee is not active should be a side effect from reading the employee information for inactive candidates which are otherwise treated as external candidates. This is useful in the recruiter applications if a recruiter leaves and others keep on working with its former requisitions and activities. As far as I remember the system even shows the employee id for inactive candidates if they reapply as external candidate. Some companies like to see that they are rehiring someone others don't like it as the fear to mix such candidates with real internal ones. So SAP will probably never take position to one of both opinions and just let it as it is for bsp (I yet have not seen if the EhP4 WebDynpro recruiter solutions, so i do not know if they kept the behaviour or not).
The IS_INACTIVE flag is set if the employee is no longer active so STAT2 is no longer 3. This check is part of the ALE inbound BAdI (or better of the class which is called in the BAdI implementation). It might be possible to change the coding but I have to admit that I cannot ad hoc judge the consequences of such a change. This would need some more analysing.
Best Regards
Roman Weise

Ability to limit the project list of values(in OTL Timecard) to only those projects to which an employee is assigned

Hello
There is already a discussion on this topic, however its answer is not accessible to any of us.
Can you please provide some insight as how to go about achieving this solution. I know we have to customize the view.
But where can we bring the information as which Employee is assigned to which project. ?
thanks
Dave

Hi Andrew,
As charlie suggested go for Analysis authorization that is the simplest approach to restrict values for any object, in another way you can use following BADI for value restriction using ABAP code, refer the below link.
[http://www.consolut.com/en/s/sap-ides-access/d/s/doc/YY-BW_BADI_F4]
By using customer exit you can only populate default values but you will not be able to restrict F4 help values.
Regards,
Durgesh.

Where should handling unit output determination procedure be assigned ?

Hi
In logistic execution, where should handling unit out put determination procedure be assigned pls ?
Thanks In Advance

A custom output type must be created with the form you would like to print and condition records for HU's must be maintained in VV61.
You can also use NACE to define the procedures and access sequence.
Hope that helps
thanks

Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not define

Hi,
I'm trying to post an IDOC of type BBPIV through XI to an R/3 system.
The posted idoc in R/3 is in status 51 (Application document not posted) with the error message "Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not defined in chart of acts WP2P"
As per my understanding this is something related to FI.
Long text of the error is "The system cannot generate an automatic posting because there is no account determination defined for Account-assigned purchase order with keys in chart of accounts WP2P.
Correct the account determination for Account-assigned purchase order"
Please help me how to solve this.
Regards,
Rashmi

Hiya,
This looks like its a MM posting / transaction.
You need to go to OBYC and maintain the account assignment. If you provide the business scenario (GR into Stock, Subcontracting, etc.) for the process, I may be able to help.
VKOA is for SD account assignment and I don't believe you can use that here.
Cheers.

Determination of Account Assignment ref., using Portfolio as a condition

Hi,
I would like to ask your experience in determination of Account Assignment Reference, using Portfolio as one of conditions - does it worked for you?
E.g. if I base Acct. Assign. Ref. determination on other conditions, like Product type, Transaction type, also Classification of Bond, then it works perfectly, however if I add Portfolio as condition, them during creation of deal, system does not determines target Acct. Assign. Ref. How you would suggest to manage that issue if I really need to use Portfolio as one of criterias for determination?
thanks.
Rgds,
Renatas

Hi,
Portfolio field can be set as AAR determination criteria for MM,OTC categories. For Securities it will be possible based on which item you assigned in Differentiation criteria. If its maintained with Portfolio, AAR determination will work else not.
Its a standard terminology that Portfolio will not be treated as a key figure untill we assign it in Differentiation critieria.
I hope this clarifies.
Regards
Prasad AV

Time Manager's Workplace and Employee temporary assignment in Shift plannin

Hello fellow SAPPERS,
I trust that this mail finds you all well.I wonder if you could help me
1. With the temporary assignment of employees to another org unit using the shift planning section of TM, will i be able to see those people temporarily assigned unedr my reporting structure within PTMW as the line manager.
2. How do i default the people/employee list on PTMW that are reporting to a specific line manager or supervisor without having to do a selection of a specific org that one is reposible to. Is it STD and backed up by user exit. I know you have to set the ID's for selection condition in IMG. But i would kik eto find out how do i default the reporting structure/list of employees without having to first make selection via Org unit?
Many Thanks
Sher

Hi,
Note that I am not sure of my answer:
1) It won't work because what you assign in shift planning doesn't change his "real" assignement.
2) Right now I don't remmeber but I think it is possible... I am suppose to spend time exploring deeper PTMW, I'll let you know if I found something

Employee qualification assignment IT0024 validity end date update

I Would like to change the validity end date value on one specific qualification assigned to an employee.
I can't do it using PA30. Is there anybody able to tell me how can I do it?
Thank you

You can't change endda because infotype 2 endda has to be '31129999'.
It's explicit here in this validation in module POST_INPUT_CHECK.
form check_it0002.   "form aus mppers00 hierher verlegt    "VLDN212840_2
if psyst-first eq yes and cprel-endda lt high_date.
*   I105(RP): Gültigkeitsende muß gleich & sein
    p0002-endda = high_date.                               "VLDN212840_2
    cprel-endda = high_date.                               "VLDN212840_2
    message e105(rp) with high_date.
endif.
if psyst-ioper eq modify.
    if cprel-endda lt high_date and pskey-endda eq high_date.
      p0002-endda = high_date.                             "VLDN212840_2
      cprel-endda = high_date.                             "VLDN212840_2
      message e105(rp) with high_date.
    endif.
endif.
endform.                    " check_it0002
high_date is a constant with value '99991231'.
Anyway, why would you want to change the endda on infotype 2 ?

BP - Employee relationships to an org unit and changes

Dear Colleagues of CRM,
The scenario pertains to an employee and its relationship to an org unit to which it is assigned. Once an employee is assigned to an org unit, a relationship too gets created with the Employee as BP. This relationship has the contact info that was available in the BP master data at that point of time.
Later on, if the employee is transferred and hence assigned to another org unit, the assignment in the org unit is changed to the new org unit. On the new org unit assignment, a new relationship gets created with the BP. However, the earlier relationship doesn't get deleted when the earlier assignment to the org unit was deleted. If I attempt to delete the relationship in the BP, it doesn't allow and prompts to u201Cu2026.Change through the HR mastersu201D. The HR master though has nothing of the contact details vis-à-vis this relationship.
The existence of this initial relationship is causing error in all my dependent programs / activities which pick up the contact details of this employee and hence trigger emails etc.
Request solution as to how do I remove this u2018oldu2019 and irrelevant relationship from the BP. It may be noted that the subsequent changes of assignment u2013 deletions in particular u2013 are deleting the relationship too but the initial one exists all throughout.
Seek your kind advise to resolve the matter .
Regards,
Tariq

Contact SAP they have given two custom reports to check and repair BUT050 entries when we have similar issue.
Regards,
Rajesh.

Error determining address for Employee

Hi Experts,
We are running SRM 5.5 (add-on) in a local scenario.
We have an issue with one employee, where they won't show with a relationship to their Org unit.
The employee has a current employee record, has a valid user id, is assigned in the Org structure and has a Business Partner. If you look at the Business Partner via transaction BP there is no relationships, if you try to repair the employee using BBP_BP_OM_INTEGRATE you get the follwoing error "Error determining address for employee DD4D5C1DB62512F19E9700144F45F5BF".
Do you have an suggestions as to what the issue may be or where we are able to veiw the address for the Business Partner?
Thanking you in Advance.

hi,
This error is mainly because of the missing addresses for the Organizational units (under which the employee is assigned)on R/3 side.
Check whether the address for the org unit are maintained on the R/3 side i.e infotype 1028.
If not,you need to maintain those on the R/3 side.Even if you try to maintain an address for the org unit on SRM side in PPOMA_BBP,you will not be able to correct this error.
See these related notes:(these are for older vesrions but will give you an idea abt the error)
Note 502564 - Correcting incorrect users
Note 419423 - Repairing incorrect EBP users
See this related thread for more pointers:
Error determining address for employee when replicating
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers.

How to delete the multiple companies assignement of a employee in SRM

Hello Friends,
In business partner maintenance (BP), one employee assigned to multiple companies in relationship tab.
Following are the entries observed in relationship tab in BP Transaction code.
Is employee of
xxx(BP number) u2013 Company(address type) --- xxx(description) u2013valid from --- valid to -->1st entry
xxx(BP number) u2013 Company(address type) --- xxx(description) u2013valid from --- valid to --> 2nd entry
Ideally one employee should assigned to one company only.
Kindly let me know how to delete the relationship.
We are using release SRM 5.0 with classic extended scenario.
The organization structure is HR Replicated.
Thanks in Advance,
Pithani Suresh

Hello Ganesh,
Thank you for providing information.
The employee is not assigned to multiple companies. The assignment is related to orgnizational unit.
In organization structure (PPOSA_BBP), the user/position is assigned to one organization unit only
More details about this issue,
we find the relationship of the user/position in BP T.code (Relationship Tab), it is showing the relationship with current organizational unit and previous organizational unit. Ideally it should be assigned to one organizational unit. Due to some inconsistency, it is still showing the previous organizational unit.
Example: Ex: User A is replicated from HR to SRM and assigned to Dept A (org unit 1) and later User A is shifted to Dept B (org unit 2) from HR Replication.
Following are the entries observed in relationship tab in BP Transaction code.
Input is BP number assigned to of the user A central person.
User u201CAu201D is employee of
BP number of org unit 1u2013 Company(address type) --- xxx(description) u2013valid from --- valid to -->1st entry
BP number of org unit 2 u2013 Company(address type) --- xxx(description) u2013valid from --- valid to --> 2nd entry
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh Pithani

T-code to view employees assigned to WBS in production client?

Hi all,
In quality and dev client i am able to see the employees( resources) assigned to 3rd level WBS Element (By selecting the 3rd level WBS element and my clicking F11 from CJ20N).There by i am getting a screen with the 3rd level WBS element with + sign. When i click the + sign then all the employees were populated. But i am unable to see in Production client. When i am trying to see, it only shows the 3rd level WBS element without + sign. So which t-code i have to get authorization to see the employees of that particular 3rd level WBS element?
Thank you.

Hi,
You can take SU53 screen shot (on the screen where ou see the WBS & employees) on your id and also on the person who is able to view it properly. Send both to your basis team and they should be able to figure out your missing authorization. Once they add the same to your profile, you should be able to see the details.
Regards
Sreekanth

Assigning employee to two positions

Hello,
In my organization the HR department has decided to enable employees to be assigned to two positions at the same time (work percentage of 50% for each).
However, the SAP-HR solution was bulit on the assumption that an employee is assigned to one position only at the same time, and it would be very hard to change all the developments (such as Z-reports, user exits etc) to fit into the new regulation.
So I would like to ask if anyone has an idea of how to cope with this new demand: does anyone know a specific PA-Infotype we may use or another solution?
Thank you & Kind regards
Adi

Hi Liran,
Probably this is what i would try if i was you..
Using the standard solution : Currently i understand all your Z reports and Developments are completed and you wouldnt wanna bother any of these to avoid further complications- Thus what i can suggest is to use/create another relationship between employee and the secondary position.
Primary Position can always have the standard A008 relationship. But you can also have the flexiility of keeping 100% to both the position the employee holds, the system does not restrict you on this.
Now, having said that - I suppose your report on Position is based on relationship or evaluation paths, thus i dont find the possibility of damaging your current developments using a custom relationship.
Let me know if this works or we can talk on an alternate solution for you.
Good Luck Mate !!
Cheers,
Regi Alex.

Notification to the employee responsible upon assignment in account

Hi,
We would like to notify the employee responsible by means of an alert or e-mail, when ever he is assigned as the employee resposible to an account.
Do we have a standard mechanism to acheive this? Can we use the rule modeller or any workflow to achieve the same?
Thanks and regards,
Vamsi.

In SWE2 create new event with the following values:
Object Category     BOR
Object Type      BUS1006
Event     CHANGED
Receiver Type     Z function
Receiver Call      Function Module
Receiver Function Module     SALRT_CREATE_VIA_EVENT
Linkage Activated     Checked
In Z function develop logic to send alert or mail and do control if employee was assigned.

Employees from Organizational assignment were not found from BP Relations

Hello Friends,
I have problem here.
When an employee is assigned to multiple positions in the same organization in the Organizational structure (PPOMA_CRM) and one such assignment is deleted at a later point of time, it will not be found from the BP relations i.e.. neither in the "Is Employee of" relationship of Employee BP nor in the "Has Employee for" relationship of the Organization BP. Steps to Reproduce: 1) Assign Employee to Position i.e. 'Sales Rep1' (General Attribute (CRM) Change) 2) Save 3) Validate from the BP of this Organisation that the Employee is in the 'Relationships' list. 4) Assign the same Employee to another Position i.e. Sales rep 2 in the same organisation 5) Save 6) Validate from the BP of this Organisation that the Employee is in the 'Relationships' list. 7) Delete Assignment from 'Sales Rep1' 8) Check Relationship of the BP. RESULT: Employee does not exist. So, if the Employee is assigned to multiple positions in the same organisation and then deleted from one of the positions, then Relationship in BP (both Organisation and Employee) is deleted.
Any one knows what is going wrong here.
Thanks a lot in advance
Rashit

Hello Frank
I've been careful regarding that as well, following some recommendations from this link: http://technology.amis.nl/2009/07/06/create-deploy-and-consume-an-adf-task-flow-with-adf-business-components-inside/
The class/package structure is different and unique for each application, "Main", "Employees" and "Departments". On a paranoid attempt while being aware of the situation you mentioned, I renamed the DataBindings.cpx (outside JDeveloper) to EmployeesDataBindings.cpx and DepartmentsDataBindings.cpx in each respective application, while refactoring the adfm.xml files to point to the new names.
I've also chosen the option to store only the name of the database connection for the deployment of each ADF Library Jar
Still, the problem persits... *cry*
One thing I didn't mention in my initial post is... I do have ADF Security (form-based) enabled on the "Main" application, with the appropriate roles assigned to the Main.jspx page and even to the bounded task flows that come from the ADF Library JARs (there's an option in the the Resource Grants section of the jazn-data.xml file when the resource type is "Task Flow" that says "Show task flows imported from ADF libraries"), without which the region in the Main.jspx page would not even try to render (I guess it would fail internally with an unauthorized error but it doesn't actually display any error in the user interface)... Could this be the root of the problem? I don't see any option to grant permissions to DataControls or AppModules tho...
Thanks again. Regards,
- Tiago Vidigal

Employee resposnsibles Org unit Determination (Employee is assigned to Org Unit)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for