ESS Benefit Plan Decimals Issue

Hello ,
We are on EP7.0 ECC6.0 and have an Open Enrollment Application which lets employees enroll for various Benefit Plans ....and when they try to Edit the Plan the cost shows up as 9.51 if the value is 9.51 in R/3.The Cost shows up as 9.5 even if the value in R/3 is 9.50....so somewhere the trailing zero is getting discarded ...Please help.
Any help would be highly appreciated.
Message was edited by:
Shikhil Arora

Any ideas anybody....

Similar Messages

Benefit plan - rule issue

Hello experts,
We have an issue that I need your help with. I am new to benefits so any help would be most appreciated.
When an employee tries to enroll their spouse in the Spouse Life benefit plan, he/she cannot enroll them unless they themselves are in the Employee Life plan. This is the way our plan is set up.
We have noticed that on ESS the first time the employee goes into Open Enrollment do this, it will correctly prevent the spouse from being enrolled without the employee having it as well. But if the employee logs off of ESS and then tries again, it will allow the spouse to be enrolled without the employee also being enrolled. It seems as if the rule doesnu2019t u2018applyu2019 all the time.
What are we missing? Is this a plan set up issue or is this an ESS issue?
Thanks,
Suparna

Hello,
This question has been answered. It apears that the rule worked one way but not the other so a rule had to be set up on the employee's plan as well.
In other words, we allow employees to enroll their spouse in suuplemental life for the amount of 1/2 the employee's election. In our case the system was allowing the spouse to be enrolled in equal to the amount or even without the employee being enrolled!
It turns out that the spouse plan had a rule about the 1/2 but the employee plan did not therefore there was no cross check happening in that direction.
Thanks,
Suparna

Benefit Plan Termination Through ESS

HI,
can the benefit plan enrollment can be terminated in the portal ess...
is there any standard available..
Thanks,
Nachy

Hi,
There are standar I-views for this.
log on the portal with the super user Id
and follow following path
Content Administration -> Portal Content -> Content Provided by SAP -> End User Content -> Employee Self-Service -> iViews -> Benefits and Payment -> United States -> Benefits Participation , Enrollment , FlexBens Enrollment etc

Benefit Plan Tremination Thru ess

HI,
can the benefit plan enrollment can be terminated in the portal ess...
is there any standard available..
Thanks,
Nachy

Hi Nashi,
I'm afraid currently termination rule are only checked via termination workbench (HRBEN**, in R/3).
This functionality is not available in ITS or ESS.
You may have to develop the same in a custom program (or raise a development request.
Kind regards
Sarah

SAP Closed Benefit Plans

Hi All,
We have certain Benefit Plans which are closed , no more new Enrollment in this plan.But existing employees can change their benefit plan option.
This plan has Plan type as that of many active plans. When i try to see this plan in Enrollment workbench i am not seeing this plan.
Whether its because of Closed status and if any workaround for this issue??
Thanks & Regards

Hi Scott,
Thanks for the suggestions scott.Its very much helpful.
Customer is not having ESS as of now.
Also Locked concept here we are using with Closed Name.
How if locked employees will be able to change the options...because i am not seeing that option in workbench???
Thanks & Regards

Getting Dependents (IT 0021) of a Benefit Plan

Hi All,
I'm attempting to write a report that will display the name and type of a dependent of a particular EE's benefit plan. I know the link is between DTY01/DID01 - DTY20/DID20 in the benefits table (EX. IT 0167) and The Subtype and OBJPS of IT 0021 (Family). However, I can't figure out quite how to display the family information for the benefit plan. I've done a flat data load in two ODS's .. one for IT0021 and one for IT0167. I would think that an InfoSet would help with this solution, however, any advice would be helpful. The issue is that an EE can have multiple dependents. This is why there are 20 DTY and DID fields.
I'm unable to use the standard BI cube for benefits. This is why I've build custom data targets.
Thanks in advance,
Meezy

Hi Meezy,
This solution is not efficient as you have already thought. What I would suggest for the time being is that link the 2 ods only based on the employees. That way, you will have all the records visible for reporting. Eg: if you have 3 records in 167 and 2 records in 21 for an employee, you can see all the 5 records with all the 20 fields in each record. In the query, you can restrict the records by the required subtype. Now, you can compare objps with each of the 20 fields in the query using calculated kfs. Again, it is not a performance optimized solution.
Thanks and Regards
Subray Hegde

Automatic Benefit Plans based on Date Types in IT0041

Hi
I am having an issue with a re-hired employee. We have two date types in IT0041. Current Hire date and Service Award Date. If somebody is hired for 1st time, both the date types are same( e.g 12/12/2008). and this case the automatic benefit plans follow the config rules properly and some start from the hire date and some from the 1st of following month as per the config ruel.
But If we are re-hiring an employee, in this case Current Hire date( 12/12/2008) would be different from Service award date ( because of his previous experience with this employer). In this case all the automatic plans are starting from the date when the re-hire action is performed, not even the re-hire date and do not follow the config rule at all.
We have never made any dependency of benefit plan on IT0041 anywhere in config, but why this is happening? Any suggestion would be appreciated,
Thanks
Wills

Nope. we never configured the dynamic eligibility part. So that makes it more strange. Because if all the date are same it works fine , but if the dates are different, it gives wrong result

ESS Benefit Enrollment - No correct adjustment reasons specified

We are in ECC 60. When testing ESS benefit open enrollment (under Content Admin - Portal Content - Content Provided by SAP - End user content - ESS - Iviews - Benefit and Payment - then either test on 'Enrollment' or 'Flex Bens Enrollment)', we keep getting error 'No Correct adjustment reasons specified' .
I already configured 'Benefit Area Admin Paramenter' to have open enrollment period to be active for month of April (for testing), and also assigned proper role in 'URL of PCD Page' for resource key 'EMPLOYEE_GENERICENROLLMENT_SERVICE05', and yet still get the error message. Searching SDN for this issue, I see that some people also had similar issues before, but there doesn't seem to be a concrete / clear solution. Appreciate if someone can shed some light on what I'm still mising .
Thanks.

Hi Ted,
Not sure if this would help.
You can try the below thread..... It also has reference to an OSS Note.
[Adjustment Reason;
Good Luck !!!
Kumarpal Jain.

HSA Benefit Plan: Employee Contr and Employer Contr deductions not happenin

Hi Experts,
For a couple of our empls, the Employee Contr and the Employer Contr wagetypes for HSA Benefit Plans are not showing up in the payroll log. For other empls, all is fine.
Here's what the payroll log in running regular payroll looks like in processing of function P0169 for this HSA benefit plan:
=========================================================
BAdI "Evaluate Ee Contrib" implemented
Calculated contributions:
Employee contribution pre-tax: 35.00 USD Weekly
No rollover of pre-tax to post-tax contributions
Post-tax contributions start only after pre-tax limit is reached
BAdI "Check Contribution Limits" implemented
BAdI "Evaluate Er Contrib" implemented
Final result contributions:
Employee contribution pre-tax: 35.00 USD
Employer contribution: 19.24 USD
BAdI "Proration" implemented
Processing proration for 12/27/2010 - 12/27/2010 results in:
========================================================
Here no wagetype is showing up though they are getting calculated above.
Regards,
Somdeb.

The issue has been resolved.
The Savings Plan HSAF had a co-requisite Health Plan HDP and we had to add this co-requisite plan for the empl.
Also the P0169 function had to be changed from BEG to CHK in the payroll schema which did the trick.
Regards,
Somdeb.

Benefit Error "No Benefit Plans found for Program Grouping"

Hi Experts,
While running Report for Employee Eligibility RPLBEN01 it through an Error Message
"No Benefit Plans found for Program Grouping 1st/2nd"
I have configured 1st and 2nd Program Grouping and maintained respective features also.
Can any body guide me to clear this issue.
Thanks in Advance.
vnk

check this view V_T5UBU whether you have created the record for you plan against your first program grouping and second program grping

How to remove Benefit plans from enrollment?

Hi all,
While Benefit enrollment testing i need to remove some plans from plans list.(not be shown in enrollment testing)Can anyone tell me how to remove these plans in enrollment testing only?
Thanks!
Seema.

Hi,
The enrollment of a Benefit Plan for an employee is dependent on the First Program Grouping and the Second Program Groupings assigned to him/her in the General Benefits Information (0171) Infotype.
Technically speaking, we can enroll/not enroll the employees for Plans only based on these groupings. All the Plans are displayed for employees, but they can enroll ony in a few based on these groupings.
Since your requirement is to not display them only in testing, and moreover, you do not want to touch the back end configuration settings, we may have to run some report to fix your issue.
Thanks and Regards,
S. Veenadhari.

I have an apple id for my ipod touch at home. My company is planning to issuing Ipads. Should I use the same apple id on the ipad for those apps I purchase and would like to purchase and use on my work ipad?

I have an apple id for my ipod touch at home. My company is planning to issuing Ipads. Should I use the same apple id on the ipad for those apps I purchase and would like to use on my work ipad?

Yes, otherwise you will have to pay for those apps again. If an app is purchased by one Apple ID, he/she will be able to redownload it again for no cost (note: this does apply to songs, but NOT to movies).

New planned goods issue date during delivery creation due to changed route

Hello All,
I have defined 2 routes with different values for transit time and transporation lead times. I have configured routes such that in order creation - route A is determined and while delivery creation due to weight group - delivery B is determined.
Now for Route A i have maintained transit time of 3 days and Transportation lead time of 4 days and for Route B it is 1 day each.
Delivery scheduling is active for the order type.
Now when i create the order with a delivery date of say 05/24/2010 then (route A with transit time of 3 days) is determined and the planned goods issue date of 05/21/2010 is in the order.
Now while creating delivery (Route B which has transit time 1 day) is determined due to the weight group. But the planned goods issue date is still the same 05/21/2010 as in order.
I am assuming that since the route B has a route of 1 day so the planned goods issue date should be re-determined to 05/23/2010? IS there no scheduling done during delivery creation even though route and subsequently transit time has changed?
Please let me know the answer to this...
Thanks
Shobhit

Hi ,
You can use TA - MASS . Enter object type - BUS2032(for sales orders) on initial screen and select sales item data.
Next screen enter selection fields like sales order no and items. After giving order no and item range , execute and enter all new values for any item data fields. After pressing button "carry out mass change", don't forget to press save button.

Need to Post Components in Production Order in MB1A through BAPI as Planned Good Issue

Hi ,
I have created a Program to upload data s for MB1A through BDC , it works fine, but for huge data s it takes more time. alternatively created one more Program which updates through BAPI Function Module "BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE". It works fine , but one issue noted, after posting through Function Module , components are posted as Unplanned Goods Issue.   I need to post the components as " Planned Goods Issue" instead of "Unplanned Goods Issue " . This can viewed through Tcode : C003
Below are the inputs passed for BAPI Function Moduel
**&------Header Contents of bapi Upload-------------------&*
header-pstng_date = sy-datum.                                              " Posting date
header-doc_date    = sy-datum.                                             " Document Date
header-header_txt = '000001002280'.                                     " Header text
header-pr_uname   = sy-uname.                                            " User Name
header-ref_doc_no = '000001002280'.                                    " Header Ref. Doc. No.
CONCATENATE sy-uname sy-uzeit c_method INTO header-ref_doc_no_long SEPARATED BY '-'. " Refer Text
*Item Data
wa_item-material   = '000000000010000800'.                             "Material
wa_item-plant      = '3910'.                                              "Plant
wa_item-stge_loc   = 'WIP'.                                            "Storage Location
wa_item-move_type = '261'.                                            "Movement Type
wa_item-entry_qnt = '1'.                                                  "Quantity
wa_item-entry_uom = 'PC'.                                              "Unit
*wa_item-res_item = 1.                                                  "Reservation Item
*wa_item-reserv_no =                                                      " Reservation Number
wa_item-batch      = '0000011027'.                                    "Batch No
*wa_item-mvt_ind   = 'F'.                                                  "Movement Indicator
*wa_item-stck_type = 'F'.                                                 "Stock Type
wa_item-orderid    = '000001002260'.                                 "Order ID
wa_item-prod_date = SY-DATUM.
*wa_item-GL_Account = '610000'.                                     "GL Account
*TRANSLATE wa_item-batch TO UPPER CASE.
*APPEND wa_item TO it_item.
c_code = '03'.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
EXPORTING
goodsmvt_header       = header
goodsmvt_code         = c_code
TABLES
goodsmvt_item         = it_item
goodsmvt_serialnumber = it_sno
return                = return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
      wait = 'X'.
    commit work and wait.
Even i tried to pass "Movement Indicator , GL Account etc" , Still not able to fix the issue. Can anyone suggest how to post the Production Order components as "Planned Goods Issue". I am not sure any other values to be password.
BR,
Murali

I have made something like your :
* Alimtentation de la BAPI de mouvement de stock MM.
move : sy-datum        to ls_header-pstng_date ,
        sy-datum        to ls_header-doc_date ,
* Indique le code mouvement
        '03'            to lw_code.      " 03 normalement, mais je veux que ca plante
loop at lt_ltap
      into ls_ltap.
   move : ls_ltap-matnr   to ls_item-material ,
          ls_ltap-werks   to ls_item-plant ,
          ls_ltap-lgort   to ls_item-stge_loc ,
          '261'           to ls_item-move_type ,
          ls_ltap-vsolm   to ls_item-entry_qnt ,
          ls_ltap-meins   to ls_item-entry_uom ,
          i_ltak_vb-benum to ls_item-orderid ,
          i_ltak_vb-rsnum to ls_item-reserv_no ,
          ls_ltap-rspos   to ls_item-res_item ,
          ls_ltap-rsart   to ls_item-res_type.
   append ls_item to lt_item.
   clear ls_item.
endloop.
I have to put the reservation number to have it works.
Fred

Actual goods issue date required to be equal to planned goods issue date

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me on what basis does the actual goods issue date get determined and what needs to be done if we want to restrict the actuall goods issue date to be equal to the planned goods issue date?
Avinash

Avinash,
Can anybody tell me on what basis does the actual goods issue date get determined
???? It is the date that the goods are actually issued from stock, e.g. whatever the date was when the delivery was actually issued, that is the date that is normally written to this field in the delivery.
what needs to be done if we want to restrict the actual goods issue date to be equal to the planned goods issue date
That's a pretty restrictive criteria. Basically, you are telling the warehouse that they are not able to issue the goods early or late. In companies I have seen, that would constitute a lot of deliveries. Hope your customers don't need the parts....
Anyhow, the restriction would have to be against the goods issue transactions being used by the warehouse. I don't believe there is any standard configuration that creates such a restriction, so it would require custom development. If you pursue this restriction, make sure you leave yourself some kind of override.
In many companies, this problem is handled through policy and procedure. Warehouse manager simply creates a policy about early and late goods issues. The system will track discrepancies in the case the policy is not followed.
Best Regards,
DB49

ESS Benefit Plan Decimals Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for