Expense allocation calculations on OPM Actual costing.

Can any body provide a Document on Expense allocation calculation on OPM Actual Costing please.
Regards
Raj

Jayabalan,
Sorry for delay. I have to check the other setups too to determine the cause of this error.
Please check if this item is transacted in prior period (Mar 2006) and ic_perd_bal table has any record for this item-whse.
Else we have to involve Oracle Support through TAR to verify the log file and other setups to determine the cause of this error. They may need the Actual Cost Process log file with debug level 3 (profile: "GMF: Debug Flag")
You can contact me through mail [email protected] if you want any help in debugging more in this.
Thanks,
Dinesh

Similar Messages

Function module for calculating planned and actual cost of production order

Hi ,
Do we have any standard function module for calculating planned and actual cost for production order?
i need to implement this in a Z-report.
Thanks
Srini

Hi,
try below function module
CRMCO_GET_PLAN_ACTUAL_COSTS
CO_IH_GET_PLANNED_COSTS_TOTAL
Regards,
Sankaran

OPM Actual Costing (PMAC) not including AP Invoice transactions

Hi,
OPM Actual Costing (PMAC) not including AP Invoice transactions in 12.1.3 version. We have set profile GMF:Include Receipts in Actual Cost = 0, GMF:Include Invoices in Actual Cost = 1 still AP Invoice not included in OPM Actual costing.
Observed, Invoices which has IPV are shown as in Actual transaction view with line source as "Invoice Price Variance". I was looking for a line source with "AP invoice" and "IPV"(if exisits) in Actual transaction view screen.
Thanks,
Solomon.

Hi,
did you run the extract AP charges request ?
thanks .
Ahmad.

OPM Actual Cost Process not selecting all Inventory Movements

We have completed 27 Move Immediate transactions (TRNI) but only 2 of the transactions appear in the Actual Cost Transactions View so our PMAC cost is not as expected. Those 2 transactions were in Sept '09. All other transactions happened in Apr, May, Jun of 2009. On July 7 the profile option "GMF: Include Inventory Movements in Actual Cost" was changed to YES. Does this mean that the Actual Cost Process will not pick up those move immediate transactions that occured before July 2009?
Robert Lovell

Hi Robert
Yes...exactly, since you have closed all the said periods before u run your Actual cost process, and later you changed your profile option.
If you want, that all the transactions (TRNI) to be in Actual process as View, Functionally (I mean from front end) it is not possible now, but u can make use of PL/SQL Language by means of technical help then you can open those periods from back end and then do the set up from front end, and then you may able to view those transactions.
It is purely technical help and require some gud stuff to do this.
Regards
Raj

Target sost calculation not considered Current cost estimate in KKBC_ORD

Hi All,
We have an case wherein it observed that target cost calculation on SFG is wrong
in KKBC_ORD where system does not considered the current cost estimate.
We have all the necessayry customisation in place for Target cost version 0 for current cost estimate.
Below is detailsed case.
1 Process Order created in Dec 2011
2 Price Released to Mat master on 01.01.2012
3 Goods movement,Operation confirmad Material Issues, FG qty delivered @ std cost 0n 04.01.2012
4 Order Technically completed (TECO)
5 KKS1/KKS2 will be done at month end.
We know that In Process order, after deliver of FG the target cost on FG is not getting calculated,target cost will be updated only after calculating variance. it does
not calculate after delivery of finished goods, On Execution of KKS1/KKS2 variance will be calculated the target cost on FG and will be updated.
In process order (COR3 --> Cost analysis) Target cost ,Actual cost and Planned cost are calculated based on the following:
Total Plan Cost = Std Cost the material required to Produce X Planned Qty of the required material
Target Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Std Qty of material required to produce, for Produced Actual Qty
Actual Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Actual Qty of material consumed, for Produced Actual Qty
The variance is calculated on SFG and assemblies based on the difference between actual and target cost in KKBC_ORD. During creation of process order, the plan cost
will be updated with the valid standard cost upon the creation.
The target cost on SFG and Assemblies is only generated when there is good receipt from production order into inventory.
The target cost is generated using the valid / recent costing run for the correspondence SFG in KKBc_ORD.
All other target costs showed in COR3 (Menu Go to > Costs > Analysis) or KKBC_ORD before doing KKS1/2 is only statistical- However in our case Traget cost calculated
on SFG in KKBC_ORD not relevant with current cost estimate.
However Actual cost and Planned cost Calculated correctly.
Actual Cost= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
Planned cost= Std Cost the material required to Produce (6.572,12) X Planned Qty (12.415)= 81.592,87
However Target cost is not considering the current cost estimate;It should be - Current Standard cost of the materilal(5.624,88)X Target Qty(13.958,124)=78512.07.
But Errorneously Target cost is showing 67.383,59 which causing unfavorable variance to standard.
It should be 78512.07-77.021,48= 1490.59 favourable var to standard in KKBC_ORD.
Any help,suggestion and input would be highly appreciated.
Thanks with Regards
Subrata

hi
target cost is your standard cost* actual confirmed quantity, not the standard quantity required
the variance calculated will be always the actual debit to the production order- actual credit of the production order
your actual credit for the process order is std cost* actual quantity delivered to the inventory= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
actual debit to the process order is total actual cost which you can see in COR3 report .
By the way for which period you have calculated variance, target cost will be calculated based on that months standard cost
krishna

Target cost, planned cost, actual cost difference

Hi!
As per my understanding , the target cost, planned cost, actual will be calculated like blow:
Actual cost = Actual quanity * Actual price ( standard price or moving average price) existed at the time of goods movement.
Planned cost = Planned quantity * Planned price ( standard price or moving average price) existed at the time of production order release based on valuation variant strategy.
Target cost = Planned Quantity * Actual price ( standard price or moving average price) when calculating variances.
whether above formulas are correct?
I have one scenario, where in process order, I am not seeing Planned quanity for compoenent/raw material, but target quanity is existed. How it is possible. When I have checked the BOM in process order, the BOM does not contain the componenet.
regs,
ramesh

Hi,
Target Cost = Costs as per the standard cost estimate * Actual Qty delivered.
For e.g. Std cost for one unit of material-x is as follows.
RM 1 - 10kg * 10 /- = 100
Activity 1 - 5 Hr * 50 /- = 250
If the actual delivery from the production is 2 units, then target cost will update as
Under Goods Issue, RM 1 - (10kg*2units) * 10 /- = 200
Under Confirmations, Activity 1 - (5 Hr*2units) * 50/- = 500
Total = 200+500 = 700
Target cost for goods issue/confirmation of activities will update only when the Goods receipt has been done but not at the time of goods issue or Confirmation of activities.
Target cost for Goods Receipt will update only when the variance has been calculated for the order.
Regards
MadhuSekhar Gupta G

Actual costing variant

We can define plan costing variant as well as actual costing variant. I know that plan costing variant is used for costing run for the material to update standard cost. Then, where do we use the actual costing variant and what is its purpose ?

Hi Nikkitha,
No Plan costing is not for calculating standard costing for a material. Both Plan COsting & Actual Costing are used in Production or Proces order scenario. Plan Costing is used to calculate the Preliminary Cost of the Prod. Order after it has been created. It can be & usually is different from Standard Cost Estimate which in Production order scenario is Target Cost. Actual Cost in a Prod. Order is calculated based on Actual Costing variant configuration & its comparison with target cost will give us variance, WIP.
Regards,
Akhil

Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                          13.00                    AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                          2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
    Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                Electricity Cost                                                1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                          16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
      Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
      Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per        100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                      2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                          2.67-      542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar Chinchkar

Dear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
       QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
       (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
    3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
      Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total -                    965.57
     4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
     LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
     DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                              PL     Act     Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar

KKS5 allocated actual cost

Hi,
In KKS5 Varience report, system is showing Target Cost, Actual cost and Allocated actual cost. Target cost and actual cost is storing in table COSS. But i want to know which table allocated actual cost will be stored. Can any one guide me on this.
govind.

Hi
1. Allocated costs are always treated as Fixed costs, unless you have booked the expenses in FI using Activity Type as Aux Account assignment object
2. Check whether these costs are included in Inventory valuation in your Cost Comp Str in OKTZ... If not relevant for inv valuation, these costs wont show up for Variance calculations
br, Ajay M

Actual cost is not seen in the variance calculation KKS2

Hi
I   did variance calculation of a Production order ( after telco) . Its a co - product.   The target cost , actual cost and allocated cost   fields are present after execution.   Now the actual cost field is   blank and so   the variance is not correct.
Pl advise on why the actual cost field is not populated with the cost.
Thanks
kamala

Hi
KOB1 shows the actual cost . I do TECO for the PO and calculate Variance for co-product material, and the actual cost is showing at zero. But   then i do settlement KO88, and the   variance amount gets posted CORRECTLY and FI document is generated.
So why is the ACTUAL COST field   ' ZERO'    in KKS2, but    KO88   settlement shows the variance amount.
It there some different logic to do variance calculation for   PO   involving main product which have co-products in it.
Thanks for any inputs
kamala

Difference between Actual Cost and Allocable costs in splitting KSS2

I have Cost splitting structure results with me(KSS2)
What is the difference between Actual Costs, Control Costs, Allocable Actual, Actual cost balance and which amount will system consider for calculating the rate with dividing the activity rates.

Hi,
In Splitting Structure KSS2 There are two Costs One is Target Cost (Planned) and Control Cost (Actual Cost)
In Variance Calculation U will See Target Cost (Planned), Actual Cost, Allocated Actual Costs.
Target Cost = Planned Cost
Control Cost = Actual Cost
Actual Cost = Actual Cost
Allocated Actual Cost = Actual Cost of the Output Qty. This is Actual Credits from Activity allocation. This is Actual Credits from delivery of Stock.
Hope you are Clear.

Actual costing: "not allocated" differences in second currency

Dear colleagues, we need your advise on the following issue.
We have Material Ledger (ML) and Currency & Valuation profile activated with two intra-currencies:
10 Company code currency
32 Group currency, profit center valuation
Both ML currencies are equal in exchange rates (1=1).
Actual costing run in ML is not working correctly for manufactured products, if raw materials were purchased for any extra-currency, e.g. USD or EUR. For example, three-level BOM:
1) for Raw materials (purchased for USD) consumption differences are equal in both ML currencies;
2) for Semi-finished product consumption differences are equal, but in second ML currency they are not included in upper-level consumption, and present as "not allocated";
3) as a result, costs are different in intra-currencies on the Finished product level.
Note 908776 - "Not included/not allocated and not distributed" - doesn't give explanation of this case.
Please, help!

HI,
Single Level Price Determination and Multiple Level Price Determination are steps that you will need to carry out as part of Month end close for Material Ledger. This is also appropriate for calculation of the product cost.
If you don't include multiple level price determination, the product cost for your part being manufactured in company code B in your example will be incorrect. However, if your concern is related to inclusion of multiple level price difference in revaluation of inventory, then you may need to introduce some custom code for reclassification purpose. You can refer to tables CKMLCR and MLCD for multiple level price differences and quantities.
Regards

Errors arose during actual cost calculation

Errors arose during actual cost calculation
No prices could be determinedfor object activitytype company code xxxx , cost center XXXX, activity type XXXX
Pls let me know immediately friends deperate,
regards,
sri

Hi
when you gone to the transaction code Kp26 Activity typ price/ planning after give the input press period screen or F6 function key and check what price was maintained for your period 12.
And even you do one thing go to the transaction code KS02 or 03. Give the cost center and press enter . Then from the meny bar select Environment -> whereused list->.
And let me confirm how you run the cost estimate for the material
bye

Actual cost calculation process

Hi, All!
I run the Actual Cost Calculation Process and created IPV is effecting PMAC, but no lines are created in gmf_invoice_distributions.

Hi,
Check the unit price of the PO and the Price for the line during AP Invoice matching. If there is a difference then it automatically goes into IPV. Also check the values for profile GMF: Include Invoices in Actual Cost.
Regards,
Malcolm

CORUPROC is not doing "Actual-Cost Calculation" - still in CO1P.

Hello friends,
As per SAP documentation, and many SCN posts I went through - all of them said CORUPROC is the program to run as batch job, and CO1P is its equivalent online transaction. In my quality system, I see CORUPROC is not doing the "Actual-Cost Calculation" - and even if I execute CORUPROC online (through SE38), it is not clearing them. (It is clearing the goods movement entries). CO1P still shows all the order/operation awaiting actual cost calculations. If I select them in CO1P, and click <save>, they are cleared.
So can someone guide me how can I make CORUPROC to do the actual cost calculation please.
Thanks,
- Chetan

Hi
I would expect to have this record processed by report CORUPROC.
It's quite easy to analyze this program in debug. Set a break-point on the line below:
IF NOT g_costs IS INITIAL
Now follow the program execution until function module CO_RB_POST_ACTUAL_COSTS is called. If the function module is called, check if it was executed correctly reading the value of variable SY-SUBRC.
BR
Caetano

Expense allocation calculations on OPM Actual costing.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for