F110 - credit note - No pymt possible because items with with a debit balance

Hi All,
we have credit note & invoice for same vendor. When doing payment run, below error message is coming.
No pymt possible because items with with a debit balance.
when we click on Reallocate & give payment method & house bank, below error mesage come:-
Enter a payment method for incoming payments
Message no. FZ010
Diagnosis
The balance of the items to be paid requires a payment method for incoming payments. You specified a payment method that is defined for outgoing payments.
System Response
The payment method is rejected.
Procedure
Enter a payment method for incoming payments.
Please advise.
Regards
Deepak

Hi Garg,
In this case, one of the option is that you can do the partial clearing or residual clearing, lets say Residual clearing, in this case system will clear the original items and open new item 700 as payable.
You can clear credit memo 1800 against two invoices 1500 and 1000, out of 1000 you need take 300 and for clearing (1000-300=-700) and -700 will be your payable amount, go to F-44.
Amount 700 will be new payable amount:
F110:
Regards
Javed

Similar Messages

F110 No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist

Hello FI gurus,
I am getting a Vendor in the exceptions list in F110 with the message: No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist.
The Vendor has a Debit balance. There are 3 invoices (total 50,000 INR) and 1 Debit memo (52,000 INR).
Is there any way that I can block the Debit memo and make a payment of 50,000 INR?

Hi,
Put the payment Block A in the Debit line Item.
F110 wil then ignore Debit item and pick the credits for payment

Error message: No pymt possible because items with a debit

Folks,
My vendor line items are
Rs 1000- credit memo dated 05/25/2006 pay terms net 30
Rs 50- credit memo dated 06/10/2006 pay terms net 30
Rs 300- credit memo dated 08/10/2006 pay terms net 30
Rs 5000 invocie dated 09/01/2006 pay terms net 30
getting error in F110 when run on 10/07/2006 :No pymt possible because items with a debit

Hi
Please check the grouping key on the vendor master record.
It could be just that the line items are grouped according to due date and are not able to offset each other.
The grouping key is on the automatic payment transactions block.
Hope this helps.

001 No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job...

Hey All:
I have this message/error/exception in payment run job log.
<b>001 No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log</b>
However,payment has been done by F110S.
Any views on why, Is that message just a warning...if so...can we change that into error...and manage not to get that payment done.
Plz advice.......kinda emergency.
Sri

Hi,
Please see OSS Note : 156793
Symptom
In the list of exceptions RFZALI10 or RFZALI20, vendors with a debit balance are listed with item indicator 006 "no valid payment method". Before the upgrade, these vendors were output correctly with´ item indicator 001 "No pymt possible because items with a debit bal. still exist; see job log".
Cause and prerequisites
The precondition for the occurrence of the symptom is that you have implemented Note 150631 in its first version or via Support Package 18 (Release 4.0B) or 02 (Release 4.5B).
Solution The error is corrected with Support Package 21 for Release 4.0B, or Support Package 04 for Release 4.5B. An advance correction is available. To do this implement the additional source code corrections in the attachment to Note 150631.
Hope this help..

F110 - No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job

hi,
I am getting the above error how to rectify the same?
Regards,

Normally you will not pay a vendor with a debit balance, because this means vendor owe you the money, may be because of some credit memo or return goods posted.
But if you are looking to pay certain specific invoices anyway today, please go to edit payment proposal in F110, and block the debit items or the invoices that you are not intending to consider in payment proposal for this vendor.
Note: you need to enter the payment block indicator allowed in the payment run. To check which payment block you can possibly use, go to SPRO
IMG>FI(New)>AR & AP> Busi Trans >Outgoing Payment>Manual Outgoing Payment> Check Payment block reason
and then find out which payment block indicator code has "Change in payment Prop" checked. You can use only these payment blocks in the payment run F110
Thanks
Ron

F110 No pymt possib because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job lo

Hi Experts,
I have vendor line items Rs 25000 alongwith that credit memo Rs 5000 with document type RI (RI- MM Invest invoice). However when we execute the payment run for this venodr it has gone into error "No pymt possib because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log". When We replicate a test case with document type RE ( RE-MM invoice ) it was allowed to reallocate credit memo value againt the invoice, but same is not happening with credit memo with document type RI.
Both the credit memo(RI and RE) created against original purchase order, however when we create the credit memo with document type RI, Invest ID checked automatically in line item level. Is invest ID is causing for an error .
Please somebody help me on this.
Edited by: Mahesh Manchikeri on Mar 11, 2011 9:43 AM

Hi Mauri/ Srnivas,
Thanks for your reply.
In this case payment program is selecting credit memos with document type RI (RI- MM Invest invoice) as wells as document type RE ( RE-MM invoice ).
In my test case I have created two credit memo reference to purchase order via transaction code MIRO with different document type RE and RI. If I take document type RI (RI- MM Invest invoice) invest ID is automatically checked at line item level 1 of the accouting document( ie vendor line item level).
And I have created one more credit memo with document type RE with reference to same PO, Invest ID is not ticket automatically at document line item level.
When we ran payment run vis F110, there is no issue with credit memo with document type RE, because I can reallocate credit memo value against the orignal invoice value, however in case of credit memo with document type RI going into exception F110 No pymt possib because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log.
It is seems that because of substitution rule assigned to document type RI with K (Vendor ) Invest ID is automatically picked in the document line item level.
Please let me know if you have any input on this issue.

The form could not be certified, possibly because of your password timeout policy

I am obtaining an error while attempting to distribute a form signed with a digital ID. I can't find any documentation or discussion threads to resolve the problem.
Specifically, while attempting to distribute the signed form in Adobe Acrobat X, the progress bar gets halfway before presenting the following pop-up error window:
The form could not be certified, possibly because of your password timeout policy. Please temporarily set the password timeout for this digital ID to "Never" or "Once per session" (in Advanced > Security Settings > Digital ID Files), and try distributing the form again.
After cancelling distribution, the Javascript debug window pops up with the following error:
General Error: Operation failed.
Field.signatureSigr: 0:
Operation not permitted
I have distributed this form before using the same method without error. Sometime in the last week, this error appeared, suggesting to me that perhaps the password for the digital ID, created in the last few weeks for testing purposes, had expired.
In any case, I went through the suggested fix of going into Security Settings, and then set the password timeout for the digital ID to "Never". No problem. I then attempted again to distribute the form, but continue to obtain the same error.
This is a form created in Livecycle ES2. The client would like to implement trusted Javascript functions - specifically, automatically saving the PDF with a live "production" editable version, along with flattened "secure" versions that can't be altered, and I would like to export the data to XML to make it easier to import data to SQL Server.
All well and good. I've done my homework on this stuff, and I was able to make it work. After a couple of weeks passed, it would no longer work. I don't remember changing any settings, because I was waiting for the client's IT department to drop the Javascript file containing the trusted functions in the Adobe Program Files folder on the server where this will work. In fact, I just walked through the same process of distributing a form on that server, and it worked. It just isn't working on my development machine.
What's up with this? Anyone have a clue? I've run out of ideas, thinking that I might just uninstall and reinstall Acrobat X.
I'd appreciate an assist.
Thanks,
Brian D

I just moved this to the Acrobat Forms forum because (unfortunately) it went unanswered for two months previously in the Security & Electronic Signatures forum. The issue persists.

Manual Metrics Not Available? Possibly because of a new universe?

Post Author: Bill Rosenbaum
CA Forum: Performance Management and Dashboards
I'm a system administrator trying to help troubleshoot the availability of some metrics in our performance management environment. I have a limited understanding of universes and the corresponding metrics but below is what I've been able to gather from some of our end users and programmers. I'm hoping that someone can help....
During the initial configuration of the system we added some manual metrics that were used to create some dashboards. We currently can see the dashboards including the metrics, but cannot edit the metrics or see the metrics to edit when clicking into the dashboard manager -- metrics tab. Since the initial creation of the manual metrics that aren't available to edit we had a consultant do some work in which he created a universe. I think that this may have something to do with our inability to see any of the previously created metrics, but I'm not sure. We can see all of the metrics associated with the universe that was created by the consultant, but cannot see any of the metrics that we created previously although the values can still be seen on the previously created dashboards. Any ideas? Thanks for your help. Bill

Post Author: jezbraker
CA Forum: Performance Management and Dashboards
first off hopefully you can still see the option to create new manual metrics? if thats the case then chances are it not some wierd security issue. To create manual metrics you need a "folder" to put them in - so when the system was first set up someone would have added a simple universe and built the metrics in that.When your consultant came in they would have build a new or extended the old universe and possibly either removed the old one or renamed the folder or something along those lines...You could have a look in System Setup, Tools, Check Itegrity and have a look at metrics - may give some indication of what the problem is?

Credit note with invoice reference are not concatenate in F110

When I create a credit note with invoice reference by VA01, the fields payment term, Baseline date for due date calculation, Assignment and Payment method are copied correctly from invoice to credit note, but in FI document the field invoice ref. 'BSEG-REBZG' is not filled. So when I run the transaction F110 Automathic Payment (for Italy) the invoice is rigthly payed but the credit not is included into Exceptions with the note 'No pymt possible because items with a credit bal.still exist'. If I put in the field 'BSEG-REBZG' the reference to the invoice, the one and credit note are concatenated and I have a rigth parzial payment.
There is a way to have this link when I post the Fi document by vf01-vf02 without putting it manually using FB03?
Thank you in advance
Gianluca.

hiii
please refer thi link reconciliation in 2005
https://websmp208.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_OBJECT=011000358700000789632007E
i would suggest you to upgrade your version, as reconciliation is very easy in higher versions
please refer sap note no 1051038.
Thanks
Rizz
Edited by: Mohammed Riyaz on Apr 24, 2009 4:01 PM

F110 - Payments not picked up during first run

I executed payment run value dated as at 26.02.07 some error had occured.
At first I've created one ID(A) witth 66 payments.However, after I check the payments there were actually still invoices not paid for that day. Hence, I perform another run with the same parameters and it has captured another 7 payments that were due under ID(B). FYI, this happened almost everytime I run the payments during end of the month as we will scoop up invoices due further than normal scoop up date. For this case, we have scoop up the documents until the end of March.I've checked the exception list for ID(A) and those invoice in ID(B) weren't in ID(A).
I've performed test run in the training environment and found that the 7paymnets(vendors) genereted error number 7 via the exception list.

exception log -
Date     Time     Message     MsgID/No./Ty
07.03.2007     10:09:48     Information re. vendor 136546 / paying company code PH01 ...     FZ     305     S
07.03.2007     10:09:48     ... payment not possible because of reported error     FZ     311     S
07.03.2007     10:09:49     Due items with currency PHP, pmnt method O - items total is > 0     FZ     328     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     Information re. vendor 136583 / paying company code PH01 ...     FZ     305     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     ... payment not possible because of reported error     FZ     311     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007.     FZ     354     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     Information re. vendor 136646 / paying company code PH01 ...     FZ     305     S
07.03.2007     10:09:51     ... payment not possible because of reported error     FZ     311     S
07.03.2007     10:09:52     Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007.     FZ     354     S
07.03.2007     10:09:56     Information re. vendor 136866 / paying company code PH01 ...     FZ     305     S
07.03.2007     10:09:56     ... payment not possible because of reported error     FZ     311     S
07.03.2007     10:09:56     Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007.     FZ     354     S
Exception list with error message
     Shell Philippines Expl BV               Payment proposal list for proposal run 26.02.2007/PH005                                             /     02:39:05
     Muntinlupa
     Company code:          PH01
Vendor 0000136546
PAN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL SALES CO,
INC.
PANPISCO BUILDING, 246 ESCOLTA ST.
1006 MANILA
PHILIPPINEN
     Exception                         No payment
               PH01     5100013065     RE     19.01.2007     22.01.2007     Z30     31     -14,410.17     0     -14,410.17          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013109     RE     06.01.2007     31.01.2007     Z30     31     -8,503.39     0     -8,503.39          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013152     RE     31.01.2007     02.02.2007     Z30     31     -475.71     0     -475.71          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013153     RE     31.01.2007     02.02.2007     Z30     31     -9,811.60     0     -9,811.60          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013186     RE     31.01.2007     02.02.2007     Z30     31     -8,503.39     0     -8,503.39          PHP     7
Vendor 0000136583
SUPPLY OILFIELD SERVICES, INC.
SALCEDO VILLAGE
20F PEALBANK CENTER 146 VALERO ST.
MAKATI
PHILIPPINEN
     Exception                         No payment
               PH01     5100012916     RE     19.01.2007     26.01.2007     Z30     31     -3,399.00     0     -3,399.00          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013117     RE     22.01.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -79,067.10     0     -79,067.10          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013165     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -9,090.64     0     -9,090.64          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013168     RE     10.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -9,822.65     0     -9,822.65          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013169     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -13,309.99     0     -13,309.99          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013170     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -121,200.00     0     -121,200.00          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013171     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -27,905.60     0     -27,905.60          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013172     RE     11.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -19,867.26     0     -19,867.26          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013173     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -6,385.16     0     -6,385.16          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013174     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -52,770.00     0     -52,770.00          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013175     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -4,144.19     0     -4,144.19          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013176     RE     11.01.2007     23.01.2007     Z30     31     -3,563.00     0     -3,563.00          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013178     RE     11.01.2007     23.01.2007     Z30     31     -142,673.78     0     -142,673.78          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013181     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -38,326.59     0     -38,326.59          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013182     RE     12.01.2007     18.01.2007     Z30     31     -4,637.51     0     -4,637.51          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013191     RE     22.01.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -10,499.00     0     -10,499.00          PHP     7
Vendor 0000136646
DESCO INCORPORATED
WEST SERVICE ROAD
KM 21 VILONCO RD.
MUNTINLUPA CITY
PHILIPPINEN
     Exception                         No payment
               PH01     5100012958     RE     27.01.2007     29.01.2007     Z30     31     -90,413.18     0     -90,413.18          PHP     7
               PH01     5100012959     RE     27.01.2007     29.01.2007     Z30     31     -242,707.50     0     -242,707.50          PHP     7
Vendor 0000136866
BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING INT.
INC.
6758 AYALA AVE,
1226 MAKATI CITY
PHILIPPINEN
     Exception                         No payment
               PH01     5100013146     RE     05.02.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -132,450.88     0     -132,450.88          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013147     RE     05.02.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -73,633.94     0     -73,633.94          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013150     RE     05.02.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -73,633.94     0     -73,633.94          PHP     7
               PH01     5100013166     RE     05.02.2007     06.02.2007     Z30     31     -239,084.79     0     -239,084.79          PHP     7
     Error
     001     No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log
     002     Item is blocked for payment
     006     No valid payment method found
     007     Error in creating the payment document; read job log

Issue in creating Credit Note for road carrier invoice from SAP TM system

Dear All,
I am facing issue in creating Credit Note for road carrier invoice from SAP TM system.
The following steps I have performed:
1)
1)    1) Create Freight order with Amount 20,100
2)     2) Create Freight Settlement Doc and send it to ECC. Hence PO and SES will be created in ECC with Amount 20,100
3)     3) Invoice verification (MIRO) done w.r.t. FO in ECC with Amount 20,100 and following entries posted :
Carrier A/c - 20,100Cr
GR/IR A/c – 20,100 Dr
4)    4) Created Credit Note in SAP TM against freight order with Amount 1,010 and transfer it to SAP ECC.
5)    5) By this a new PO and SES was created with negative values (with amount 1,010) in SAP ECC
6)    6) In transaction MIRO, Credit Memo was created against the freight order.
7)    7) By this it is showing value 21,110 by adding the line items of Original Purchase Order and Credit Note Purchase Order as 20,100 and 1,010 respectively.
8)    8) By posting this following are the accounting entries which is not correct:
Carrier A/c – 21,110 Dr
GR/IR – 20,100 Cr
GR/IR – 1,010 Cr
9)    9) In report FBL1N which is showing the remaining liability of value 1,010(21,100 – 20,100) instead of 19,090 (20,100-1,010=19,090) for the carrier.
Please suggest how to resolve the issue and get the correct accounting for credit memo?
Regards,
Vibhu Gupta

Hello,
Like my reply in Linkedin group, I got the same issue and solved with BADI in TM side(REQREQ...).
Regards, Marcelo Lauria

Net Due Date differences in Credit Note

Hi FI Gurus,
I have pass an entry for returns Credit Note based on return order u2013 This Credit Note was created on 11/05/08 with Payment Term (T60B) 60 days from B/L date so the due date should 60 days from the B/L date means the net due date should be 10/07/08.
But in my case system is showing the same due date as the document date means the document date is 11/05/08 and the net due date is also the same 11/05/08 in FBL5N customer line item report.
Kindly can any body help me why system is behaving like this, while only passing the CN entry system is showing the same due date as doc date, for the normal customer invoice for same payment term (T60B) is calculating accurately 60 days from the baseline date.
Thanks and Regards,
Yasir

Credit memos are of 2 types
Other Credit Memos.
Terms of payment in other credit memos are invalid. These credit memos
are due on the baseline date. To activate the terms of payment in these
non-invoice-related credit memos, enter a V in the invoice reference field
during document entry.
Invoice related credit memos:
Credit memos can be linked to the original invoice by entering the invoice
number in the invoice reference field during document entry. In this case,
the terms of payment are copied from the invoice so that the invoice and the
credit memo are due on the same date.
If you look at the second option you need to give the Invoice referevce to default the terms from Invoice or use "V" in the reference feild.
Hope you have understood the concept.
reward if useful.
sarma

FMS in CREDIT NOTE

Hello
Is there any way to trigger a FMS automaticaly when i copy from an invoice to a credit note??.
I have tried with diferent fields but i had no success.
Thanks
Jacobo

Hello Bishal
There are two types of invoices (items, and services). I have a formated search in the invoices, that when i choose items, i get a series of documents, and when i choose service i get another series of documents. This is working great, but when i copy an invoice to a credit note i would like to have the same functionality, (with items one series of documents, and with service another series of documents).
I have already made the formated search, but i would like that the formated search trigers automaticaly when i copy an invoice to a credit note.
Thanks
Jacobo

Debit and credit note - integration between mm & sd with fi

Hi,
How does the information flow from MM & SD to FI in the process of raising a DEBIT and CREDIT NOTES' respectively?
(I'm aware of the fact that we need to define the document types "KG" and "DG" and raise the aforementioned by using F-41 & F-27).
However, my doubts are:
1. At what point do we need an FI-MM and FI-SD integration in raising the debit and credit notes'.
2. What is the role of an MM and SD end user along with FI end user in raising the DEBIT AND CREDIT notes, i.e., how do we deal with the inventory in MM in the process of PURCHASE RETURNS and the goods and value of goods sold as far as SALES RETURNS IS concerned, i.e., once purchase returns and sales returns are booked in the relevant deparments, at what point does an accounts executive or FI end user come into picture to raise the aforementioned.
Regards
Sandhya

Hi,
How does the information flow from MM & SD to FI in the process of raising a DEBIT and CREDIT NOTES' respectively?
(I'm aware of the fact that we need to define the document types "KG" and "DG" and raise the aforementioned by using F-41 & F-27).
However, my doubts are:
1. At what point do we need an FI-MM and FI-SD integration in raising the debit and credit notes'.
2. What is the role of an MM and SD end user along with FI end user in raising the DEBIT AND CREDIT notes, i.e., how do we deal with the inventory in MM in the process of PURCHASE RETURNS and the goods and value of goods sold as far as SALES RETURNS IS concerned, i.e., once purchase returns and sales returns are booked in the relevant deparments, at what point does an accounts executive or FI end user come into picture to raise the aforementioned.
Regards
Sandhya

Post a credit note in FB75 asking for true a/c assignment

hi SAP techies
I am trying to post a credit note for invoice no. and re-invoice with the correct VAT code. In FB75 it is asking for a True Account Assignment Account With Revenues. Any advice.please help.
Kind regards
Edited by: akausar on Jun 24, 2010 11:15 PM
Edited by: akausar on Jun 24, 2010 11:23 PM

hi,
assign profit center or cost center with cost element catagory 43.
regrd's
Edited by: samiuk on Jun 25, 2010 8:50 PM

F110 - credit note - No pymt possible because items with with a debit balance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for