Final confirm one operation sets order status CNF

Here is the issue I am having.
I have PM Order with multiple operations. If I confirm any one operation with 'Final confirmation' checked then Order status changes to CNF and I am unable to do any further confirmation on the order.
I am expecting the order status to be changed to CNF only after ALL the operations have a CNF status, but it is not behaving like that. I searched oss and could not find any relevant notes.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
PJ

Philip
Some questions:
- Do all operation have time
- Do all operations have the same Operation Control Key
- Are you using any batch programs to update the order/confirmation
- How are the confirmations created
- Are there any user-exits/BADIs being used on the confirmations
PeteA

Similar Messages

  • Component check during order status CNF

    Hi,
    My requirement is when I confirm last operation system should check that all the components mentioned in the order have been issued for that order. If all the components have not been issued system should not allow me to confirm last operation with status CNF sothat it will not make the order status as CNF.
    Is there any way or exit available?
    Regards,
    Mayur

    Mayur,
    Use enchancement CONFPP03
    Regards,
    Prasobh
    Edited by: Prasobh Karunakaran on Oct 22, 2009 7:04 PM- Enchancement corrected to the right one

  • Can not confirm the operation because of Status inconsistency?

    Hi Gurus,
                 I have error message BS013, System Status is active for Operation.
                 The Opeartion status in CTRD and REL (both are active)  the workorder is REL.
                 When I am trying to confirm the operation through IW41, I get the error message BS013.
                  When I search the SAP notes I got the note 638826, but it is already implemented in my workpackage 4.7.
                 There is no other note I can find.
                 kindly help.
    With regards,
    Narendra

    Hi
    Pls check the standard system status maintained in the BS22, in your Dev client and check whether any body have changed the standard settings. If so reverse it to the standard SAP setting with the help of your administrator.
    Regards
    Nirmal

  • Set order status to completed if subsequent document is a proforma invoice

    Dear Experts,
    I created a debit memo request to create as subsequent document a proforma invoice only. This special business case has to do with customs purposes and should stop after the creation of the proforma..
    Now the debit memo request is still open and the next batch run is picking up the DMR again and create another proforma invoice.
    What I have to do to set the order status to completed after the first proforma invoice is issued?
    Thanks for your help.
    Kind regards
    Frank

    Hello,
    Check for the possiblilies of the following.
    In VOV8, slect the debit memo request order type, make the Order related billing type as F5 (Proforma - Order related).
    Check the item category for the Debit memo request item, standard is L2N. Maintian the billing relevency field as
    D-Proforma , maintain the completion as Colpleted after the first reference , if required.
    Prase

  • Process Order does Confirmations and GR even after the Process order is CNF

    Not Sure why the Formatting is lost.
    Hi Gurus,                                                                               
    I am a beginner in this area and request your help.                                                                               
    We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
    The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
    We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
    Case 1:
    1. Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only 100 is accepted.
    2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
    3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
    That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
    Case 2: (The one with the problem)
    1.  Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only the 100 is accepted.
    2.  25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
    3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
    At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
    4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
    The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
    5. The Process order  allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are  same .
    so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Suraj

    Hi Suraj,
    I am not positive, but I suspectt the problem lies in the BAPI.  It might be how you have the data set in MII, but it sounded like you are doing it correctly. 
    However there are a number of things you can do to troubleshoot your situation.
    First create a few process orders to test with. 
    Record the confirmation numbers and counters for each of the following:
    1) Do a final confirmation (for quantity of 25 instead of the 100) in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using). 
    2) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) in SE37 or BAPI in ERP using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT.
    3) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) from MII using your current transaction. 
    Review the confirmations in ERP to see if there are any differences.
    Review the confirmaitons in MII to see if there are any non visible differences (use a Tracer to retrieve the response segment from an execution of BAPI_PROCORDCONF_GETDETAIL using the recorded confirmation numbers and counters) 
    Case 1) If there are differences in the results, that should tell you how to modify your transaction to include or change the appropriate values in your inputs. 
    Case 2) If there are no differences, then it is most likely that there is something not working properly in the BAPI you are using.  It may not completely replicate the functionality in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using in ERP).  Then open a ticket, because the BAPI is not working as it should.
    Good luck,
    Mike
    Edited by: Michael Appleby on Aug 17, 2009 8:20 PM

  • Preventing additional component consumption after final confirm in PM Order

    Hi,
    I am trying to block the consumption of additional components after the final confirmation in a PM order, this is causing erroneous component consp. especially in orders with multiple operations.
    The user may choose a confirmed operation while recording a component, system gives an error but it does not prevent the recording of that component, I want the users to get an error and stop there in such a case.
    I hope I made myself clear, thanks in advance
    IW32 Screen: https://picasaweb.google.com/koray.tulumen/Paylasacaklarim#5707123654338971234

    OK once more I thought I should add screens to better tell what I was trying to ask, I could not do that with the old forum layout. Anyways, could I get that result (in the screens) thru customization. There have been other comments relying on Orders' user statuses but with multiple operations they are not usable, every operation is confirmed individually and order status does either let or deny material movements thru the whole order (all operations)
    Here are the screens, thanks again.

  • PIR quantity has not been consumed against auto final confirmation

    Dear Frieds,
    Iam using stratergy 11( BSF)
    Production Plan has been creating through Demand Management MD61
    Suppose I have created  500 Kg of PIR through MD61 and
    Generated Process Order of 500 kg on the same day
    Now,when the process order has been confirmed  of 400 kg with final confirmation and auto G.R setting
    The goods movement has been completed with GR quantity
    But 500 kg of PIR remained unconsumed
    How this PIR of 500 kg has been consumed against 400 kg of auto final confirmation(less then < Process order Quantity)

    Hi,
    Can you let me know what you mean by :
    Now my gr qty is 400 and PIR is 500
    so 100 qty has been remained in the system and effecting MRP run
    therefore i have to consumed all PIR qty of 500 even if i made GR less than 500 qty
    If i am right in MD04 you notice a open qty of PIR for 100 & a planned order for 100 to meet this demand ?
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Production order status was not changed to 'CNF' after final confirmation.

    Hi guru.
    I experienced very special case that production order status was not changed to CNF after final confirmation.
    I did final confirmation and canceled confirmation. (CNF -> REL)
    And I did final confirmation again because of fixing activity quantity.
    the strange thing is that production order status wasn't changed from REL to CNF.
    I did  confirmation again with 0 activity, thereby  I solved this problem
    BUT i don't know why this case happened.
    Please, explain the reason.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    As per my observation, their is not any change in the status of the order REL with confirmation CNF, instead of this, it has change from CRTD & then to TECO.
       Sequence of the status of the order as below
    1) CRTD MANC NMAT SETC
    2) REL  NMAT SETC - Changes from CRTD to REL after releasing of the order
    3) REL  CNF  PRC  CSER ERTR OPGN SETC -  After confirmation, it updated after the order REL status.
    Rgd,
    Chetan

  • Production order status - Finally Confirmed

    Dear Team,
    I would like to know the date on which the production order has got the status 'Confimed' (no more confirmations are possible on this order). In which table the final confirmation (last confirmation for this order) date is stored?
    Also i would like to know for a given production order, weather goods movement is allowed or not? In which table this info is stored?
    your input required
    regards
    psk
    Edited by: psk.psg on Jan 18, 2012 11:22 AM

    HI PSK
    All confirmations of production orders are stored in table AFRU - details fields are - AUFNR- order no, BUDAT- posting date, RUECK- confirmation no & all activities etc.
    Goods movement allowed or not is controlled through order status ( say if the order is not released it wont be allowed) , further if the order is locked no goods movmt, then if the orders are TECO goods movment may be allowed or not depending on config setting. If order status is business completed no movment alloed
    shakti

  • Need to confirm actual time for 2 persons on one operation  in work order( PM)

    Need to confirm actual time for 2 persons on one operation  in work order( PM)

    Hi Abdullatif Siam,
    If you can move your discussion to the relevant space, possibility of people responding to you would be more..
    May be you move your post here -- Enterprise Asset Management --> http://scn.sap.com/community/eam
    BR
    Prabhith

  • Production order status and MRP planning - CNF and DLV

    I am confirming a production order using CO15. I have a single operation. The control key of the operation says that there will be no goods receipt. The GR will be done seperately using MIGO to order. My order is for 24000. I do a GR for 23000 using MIGO and then do a final confirmation using CO15. The order is now in status CNF and PDLV. Now for planning in MD04 it still shows a pending qty of 1000. If I TECO the order or mark it 'delivery complete' then it is wiped out of planning.
    My question is if there is a configuration setting where if a order is in CNF but not delivered it should get wiped out of MRP planning?
    thanks a lot

    John,
    The problem is that doing so would lead to (business) inconsitencies and I do not advise you to TECO or DLV the order just to get rid of it.
    Whilst it may not be "nice" to see it appear in MD04 it is there for a purpose - to reflect the fact that a quantity is going to be goods receipted.
    EG:
    You have an order for 10  --> MD04 shows an expected GR of 10.
    You do a final confimration for 7 --> MD04 now shows an expected GR of 7.
    When you do the MIGO for the order for a qty of 7 , the order will disappear form MD04 - which is right.
    If that order was to disappear from MD04, during yur next MRP, SAP would generate another procurement proposal to cover any requirements you may have.
    As Vivek said, I would investigate doing an AUTO GR.
    Hope it helps.
    Edited by: Pascal on Jul 31, 2009 3:28 PM

  • Prod.Order Creation- Using Reference Operation set.

    Hi
    While creating a production order of particular order type,after entering the quantity and order finish date as today's date(05.06.2007),backward scehduling,it's showing no routing found for the material (as we are using REM-Repetitive manufacturing,we are having rate routing) ,and in the same mesaage box itself I choosed the Reference operation set(that I have created today) and entered the  group no,and after entering its showing me an error as <b>Ref. operation set 50000008 is not valid according to the selection conditions</b>,
    So I created a routing for the same material nd in MRP4 view of the same material under for selection method i kept blank(Selection by order qunatity) and tried to create Prod.order,and there was no problem,but if the same i'm trying to create using Reference operation set I'm not able to create the Production order.
    Kindly give me a solution for this,Is there anything to do with order type dependent parameters of the particular order type?
    Thanks & Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    Is your problem solved ?
    One more solution to create a order with reference operation set,is to use a trigger point.
    Once you create a reference operation set.
    Use T.code co31 to create a trigger point, chosoe create order with reference & choose a system status eg: PCNF. & click the user parameter tab.
    The system will aks for the reference operation set no & group counter.
    Then assign this reference operation set to the routing operation.
    When you do partial confirmation of this operation, this will trigger the generation of a order.
    Regards,
    Senthilkumar SD

  • PM order status remains as PCNF even after completion confirmation & TECO

    Hi,
    For some of the PM orders we created, the order status is till in PCNF and operation status in MCNF.
    We have done the following also
    1) Completion confirmation done for all operations
    2) "Fincal confirmation" and "No remaining work" tabs checked for all operation confirmations
    3) TECO is done
    But still the operations are in mCNF-Manual confirmation status and hence the order is is in PCNF.
    Please let me know how to change the order status from PCNF to CNF.

    Please check any Sub operation confirmation is pending or ? if so please do ( IW41 )
    Riyaj
    Edited by: riyajmaner on Feb 24, 2012 5:08 PM

  • PRODUCTION ORDER--Qty changed after one operation----URGENT

    Dear Experts
            Hope u all R doing well
    In the production order,after one operation completed(whether it is first ,second  or last ) the system is allowing to change the qty.
    but we want the system to disallow  the qty change.
    could anybody can help, is there any configuration settings inside?
    waiting for your valuable response
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Sorry for the delay.
    Pl. follow the steps below.
    1. Create a status profile Eg: s1 usng t.code bs02.
    2. Enter status no. as 1, status as CRTD, a description, tick Initial status & lower status no. as 1 & higher status no. as 2.
    3.In the second line enter status no. as 2, status as REL, a description,  & lower status no. as 1 & higher status no. as 3.
    4.Choose Object type tab.
    5. Choose PP/PM: Order header.(tick)
    6.Then come back to main screen & double click REL.
    7.Click the create icon in the top.
    8.Choose Release & then choose radio button under <b>SET.</b>
    9.Then come back to main screen & again double click REL & then choose create & select change & check the radio button under <b>FORBID</b> & then save.
    10. In t.code OPJH(order type), choose your order type & then assign the status profile( Eg:S1)
    11.Now convert the planned order into production order.Release the order & save.
    Further changes cannot be made in the production order.
    Pl. give feedback after testing.
    Regards,
    S.D.Senthilkumar

  • Process Order Partial confirmation (PNCF) and Final Confirmation

    Hi expert,
    I'm already running t-code COHVPI to mass processing process order so it status change from TECO to CLOSED. But there is an error message "process order partially confirmed". Is that true if process order must be final confirmed before it changed to CLOSED. Should we change the status of partial confirmed (PNCF) to Final confirmed (CNF) before process order CLOSED.
    Please give me a suggestion.
    Thank you.

    Correct. Final Confirmation is THE signal to the rest of the world that that this order is DONE (at least from the GR standpoint). This will also retire the order from the APO/SNP radar.

Maybe you are looking for

  • XI 3.0 -    XML - IDOC inbound scenario  via ftp  UTF-8 character encoding

    Hi Everyone, I'm having difficulties with a particular scenario. I receive via the ftp adapter xml files which have a header indicating UTF-8 coding. In SXMB_MONI, i see the cyrillic characters and after mapping the target message payload as well hav

  • Open PDF 1.4 in Acrobat 9 and save as 1.4

    I am trying to resolve an issue where when I open a PDF in Acrobat 9 and then close the file after changes it will take a PDF 1.4 and make it a PDF 1.5. Is there any way to have Acrobat save the PDF files as the same version as was opened, by default

  • HT5312 The link to reset security questions does not exist anywhere I have found...any know where I can get it?

    Does anyone know how I can reset apple id security questions? In support they show a link but that does not existing anywhere that I can find. I just got a new phone and cannot buy anything without answering the questions but I cannot seem to get the

  • Content Server on Virtual Machine with VPN

    Hello everybody. I want to create a test-environment with a Content Server. Regarding to the needed Operating System I decided to use VMware Workstation to virtualize the OS and the Content Server. Host-OS: Windows XP Professional Host-IP: 192.17.1.1

  • Cfdocument and fonts.

    I am trying to get ColdFusion to use our Frutiger Roman fonts which are in a PFM format. The windows 2003 server sees them fine and the fonts work in all windows software on the server but they do not show up when publishing a PDF from cfdocument. An