Formulas not calculating

Hello, My teammates and I are using Hyperion Essbase Add-In for Excel v 6.5.5.0 with Excel 2002 SP3. We've got two ranges in a template that use formulas to specify the headers in our pull. One formula uses Excel's VLOOKUP function to retrieve a value, and the other formula simply points to another cell value on a different worksheet. When we retrieve the data, the formula pointing to the other cell value displays as the formula, not the value it refers to. The VLOOKUP formula is fine. Essbase options are set to Mode = Formulas - Retain on Retrieval. Is there another option I need to change? Thanks, DJ

Nevermind - I found the issue was actually a cell formatting issue with Excel - not the Hyperion Add-In. DJ

Similar Messages

Excel formulas not calculating imported SSIS data

I have an SSIS package that exports data to a password protected worksheet. The SSIS package works great and all the data is in the right cells. However, some of the cells that are protected have formulas in them that do calculations the data
that has been imported. The cells with formulas don't pick up the new data. I have tried F9 and that doesn't work. The only thing that works is to either re-enter the data manually or I can copy and paste the data right back into the same
cells and then the formula picks up the new data.
The client has specific formulas that they do not want to be changed. Adding macros to the workbook is not allowed.
How can I get the formulas to pick up the imported data?
This is very frustrating. I have spent the better part of 2 months converting data from MS ACCESS to SQL, built massive queries and put together a very nice SSIS package that does exactly what I want it to do, only to get stonewalled by Excel.

Leo,
Some of the cells in the worksheet are un-protected to allow users to enter in values, then the cell with the formula - which are protected - updates with the results of the formula.
For instance cell A1 is protected, cells B1 through F1 are un-protected. Cell A1 has the formula =Sum(B1:F1) if the user manually enters in the values 2, 2, 3, 2, 4 into cells B1, C1, D1, E1, & F1 respectively then cell A1 would update to
2, 2, 7, 9, 13 as the numbers get entered.
I am exporting data from a SQL table to Excel through SSIS. So for example if I export the same values (2,2,3,2,4) to cells B1 through F1 and then open the Excel file, the values that were exported are in the correct cells, but the value in cell A1
is blank.
If I then select cells B1:F1 and do a copy and past, then the formula picks up the values, and does the calculation, showing 13.
dc

Sum formula not calculating sum accurately

Hie All,
In my Webi report, I've included a sum formula (Sum[actual hours]) for both rows and columns. However, the total is inaccurate for some rows/columns. Any idea why this could happen and how to resolve the issue? Thanks.

Hi Jeewan,
You can try these but i'm not sure it will work:
1. Try merge dimension on common objects.
2. Try sum(sum([actual hours]))
3. Instead of using formula you can use the sum function available in "Analysis -> Function -> Σ Sum"
4. It can be due to the projection used at universe level for this you have to access the universe and check.
5. Try dragging some compatible objects in object browser it might happens some times that data will not come correctly.
6. last one (hit and try) check the filters once.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Shardendu Pandey

Which is faster - Member formula or Calculation script?

Hi,
I have a very basic question, though I am not sure if there is a definite right or wrong answer.
To keep the calculation scripts to a minimum, I have put all the calculations in member formula.
Which is faster - Member formula or calculation scripts? Because, if i am not mistaken, FIX cannot be used in member formulas, so I need to resort to the use of IF, which is not index driven!
Though in the calculation script,while aggregating members which have member formula, I have tried to FIX as many members as I can.
What is the best way to optimize member formulas?
I am using Hyperion Planning and Essbase 11.1.2.1.
Thanks.

Re the mostly "free" comment -- if the block is in memory (qualification #1), and the formula is within the block (qualification #2), the the expensive bit was reading the block off of the disk and expanding it into memory. Once that is done, I typically think of the dynamic calcs as free as the amount of data being moved about is very, very, very small. That goes out the window if the formula pulls lots of blocks to value and they get cycled in and out of the cache. Then they are not free and are potentially slower. And yes, I have personally shot myself in the foot with this -- I wrote a calc that did @PRIORS against a bunch of years. It was a dream when I pulled 10 cells. And then I found out that the client had reports that pulled 5,000. Performance when right down the drain at that point. That one was 100% my fault for not forcing the client to show me what they were reporting.
I think your reference to stored formulas being 10-15% faster than calc script formulas deals with if the Formulas are executed from within the default calc. When the default Calc is used, it precompiles the formulas and handles many two pass calculations in a single pass. Perhaps that is what you are thinking of.^^^I guess that must be it. I think I remember you talking about this technique at one of your Kscope sessions and realizing that I had never tried that approach. Isn't there something funky about not being able to turn off the default calc if a user has calc access? I sort of thing so. I typically assing a ; to the default calc so it can't do anything.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

Which is faster - Member formula or Calculation scripts?

Hi,
I have a very basic question, though I am not sure if there is a definite right or wrong answer.
To keep the calculation scripts to a minimum, I have put all the calculations in member formula.
Which is faster - Member formula or calculation scripts? Because, if i am not mistaken, FIX cannot be used in member formulas, so I need to resort to the use of IF, which is not index driven!
Though in the calculation script,while aggregating members which have member formula, I have tried to FIX as many members as I can.
What is the best way to optimize member formulas?
I am using Hyperion Planning and Essbase 11.1.2.1.
Thanks.

The idea that you can't reference a member formula in a FIX is false. Here's an example:
- Assume you have an account that has a data storage of Stored or Never Share.
- This account is called Account_A and it has a member formula of Account_B * Account_C;.
- You would calculate this account within a FIX (inside of a business rule) something like this:
FIX(whatever . . . )
"Account_A";
ENDFIX
If you simply place the member named followed by a semi-colon within a business rule, the business rule will execute the code in the in that member's member formula.
Why would you want to do this instead of just putting ALL of the logic inside the business rule? Perhaps that logic gets referenced in a LOT of different business rules, and you want to centralize the code in the outline? This way, if the logic changes, you only need to update it in one location. The downside to this is that it can make debugging a bit harder. When something doesn't work, you can find yourself searching for the code a bit.
Most of my applications end up with a mix of member formulas and business rules. I find that performance isn't the main driving force behind where I put my code. (The performance difference is usually not that significant when you're talking about stored members.) What typically drives my decision is the organization of code and future maintenance. It's more art than science.
Hope this helps,
- Jake

Pension not calculated when EE is hired mid-month

Hi All
Please suggest for the following....
When an Employee is hired in the middle of the month, the system doesn't calculate Pension Contribution.
Like if an EE is hired on 10th April. The system will calculate all payments & deductions, but it is not calculating the Pension Contributions.
I am maintaining IT 169, 171 for Pension Contribution.
The problem I found behind this is.....(WIth the help of an ABAPer)
-: System checks the Payroll Period Start Date with the Org. Assignment start date. When it doesnu2019t match, the system does not calculate the Pension Contribution.
For the time being I solved this through the following action -: In debugging, I canceled this condition (skipped this check). Then it calculated the Pension Contribution.
But, this is not the right solution for achieving that as we are changing standard SAP coding.
Please suggest any solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards

If your schema has p0169 with BEG that will happen, try put below Param1 which fits your requirement.
BEG
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period begin date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record ends
within the current payroll period.
END
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period end date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record begins
within the current payroll period.
CHK
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll check date (the pay date),
regardless of whether the check date falls into the payroll period
itself.
A record whose validity starts after the end date of the current payroll
period is still evaluated if the check date (which lies in the future)
falls within the validity period of the infotype.
FRST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The first intersection is taken to
determine the full period deduction amount which is stored without
proration.
LAST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The last intersection is taken to determine
the full period deduction amount which is stored without proration.

Due date not calculated in F-28

Hello,
Can anyone tell me if in standard SAP, in F-28 (incoming payment) why the due date (or payment date) is not calculated ?
I fulfilled posting date and document date (both 01/09/2009) and payment terms also (Z100 - 90 days end of month), but after saving the document and when i check it in FB03, i found that payment date (or due date) still 01/09/2009 and not 30/11/2009.
Can someone explain why and in which cases SAP dosn't calculate the due date ?
In advance, thank you for help

Hi,
The transaction F-28 - Incoming payment, in general it is used for receiving payments. Then what is your requirement to calculate due data from posting date of this document. Are you referring to value date in the bank item? The due date will be calculated from baseline date in invoice, in this case you need to check the baseline date in the invoice (open item), right?
Correct me, if my understanding on your requirement is wrong.
thanks,
Kumar

Overheads not calculated in CK11N cost estimation

Hi all,
I have two issues
1. When i am executing CK11N,i am not able to get the overhead calculation in itemization,but its showing some ridiculess firgure in cost component structure.I am using dependency D020.
2 . when i am using dependency D050 the system not calculating overheads.
We have single plant with two process Repetative and Process order.I want to calculate the overhead on the Order type basis but the system is not calculating the overhead.
So i changed the dependency to D050,now its showing the overhead figure in cost component structure but whic is not matching with the overhead rate i have given..
as my go live is 20 of this month .....its bit emergency
Revert
Regards
Pran

Hi all,
Thnx for your reply.
But i have maintained all the entries in the respective area,even though i am geeting the issue.
It was working fine for my previous repetative manufacturing ...i am using the single cost sheet for both repetative and process order.
And one more thing is that i have a Semi finished goods which is the output of REIM order and is included in process order of the finished good.
The system is calculating the overheads for the semi finished good too once again.
Eg,
Raw Material A and B produces Semi finish material C overheads and the utilities are calculated correctly in Repetative manufacturing.
The semi finished material C is used in producing the finished material D ....in which the system is not caculating the utilities.The big problem is that the figure(value) of itemzation and the Cost component structure is showing two different values.
I am not sure and able to know how and why the system calculates and from where it gets these values ...... totally confussed and under pressure (may not be able to to explain properly).
Revert
Pran

Depreciation not calculated and posted

Dear All
I have a problem. Actually we had a legacy data transfer last year in the month of March.
All the assets were posted to new company code fronm the old company code by using an initial clearing account.
the entries were done through f-02.
My problem lies in the fact that 4 assets which were posted at that time are not functioning well.
The balances got transfered as opening balances in Aw01n but there is no planned depreciation for them for the year 09-10.The amounts are coming as " zero" in the planned depreciation tab.
As a result of which my asset acquisition reports are not coming correct.
I have figured out the diiferences..
The differences are regarding these 4 assets only.
Could any of you please help me in finding the reason why the depreciation is not calculated on these assets since April 2009 and how they are appearing "ZERO" in the acquistion report when there is a actual balance in the asset
Thanking you
regards
Ruby

Hi
I have checked the asset in the previous company code also.. All the parameters are same..plus in that company code the sysytem has shown the planneed depreciation too for all the assets.
now I think the problem lies in the depreciation key or in some linking between depreciation key and the asset..
have you any clue about the areas that needs to be checked for this sort of linkage?
Plus there is no over charging of depreciation.... The system didnot calculate anything in the present company code.........
Regards
Ruby jamwal

Income tax is not calculated After Total Income

Dear All,
                    I am running my payroll but my Income tax is not calculating properly because when am seeing my log then i find my total income is calculated properly but after that my STANDARD DEDUCTION is not been happening according to the rule if the employe is men it should be deducted 150,000 but it's not happenings . In payroll log where i can see the this (STANDARD DEDUCTION)amount because am not able to find how much deduction is happenings.My employe joining date is 01.05.2009
I am giving my salary components.
Basic-19500
HRA-13650
Performance-15000
LIC(IT0586 80C)-35215
Tution Fee(IT0586 80 C)-16800
Calculated PF-2340
CAlcualtion is done on the basis of 11 month
Gross Salary                   529,650.00
Exemption U/S 10               107,250.00 (HRA Annual Ex)
Balance                        422,400.00
Incm under Hd Salary           422,400.00
Gross Tot Income               422,400.00
Agg of Chapter VI               77,755.00
Total Income                   344,650.00 (Till Here Every thng is fine From the next level am not able to identify how much and which basis MY Standard deduction is calculated)
Tax on total Income             52,395.00
Tax payable and surcharg        53,967.00
Income Tax                       4,906.00
Kindly help me to resolve this issue am not a functional guy.
Thanks
Sandeep

Dear Siknder ,
                           I alredy check in it0002 it male.
I want to know how should i check in my payroll log what calculation is happening after my total income get.
And also how i can identify which finacial year calculation is been performed.

Excise Duties is not Calculating in Excise Invoice

Hi Experts,
I am doing CIN configuration, i did all configuration settings, I did classify condition types also, but i am not getting Excise duties is not calculating in to Excise INVOICE, please help me with solution
Thanks
SESHU

Please try to develop the habit of updating the forum properly so that it will be helpful to all. The comment what you have added is not going to solve the problem.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

BED is not calculating values after enter Excise Invoice number in MIGO

Hi,
We are doing a process of MB01 --> J1IEX --> MIGO.
At the time of J1IEX, we entered the Excise Invoice number and date. After that when we change the quantity, then BED is automatically change.
But at the time of MIGO, when we enter the Excise Invoice number, then BED is not calculating as calculated in J1IEX earlier.
This was working fine before apply the Patch. I think this is due to Patch because in our Development system still working fine but we have apply the Patch in Quality Server..there this problem comes..
Please guide what should be configuration changes has been done after apply the patch.
Applied Patch is: - SAPKH60015 & SAPKH60016..
Plz guide..

hi
i think your doing something wrong
i think first when u did j1iex then in MIGo u have to go for ONLY REFER INVOICE option
better you go for other process
DO GR for required quantity say 5 out of 10 without excise
then do J1iex with reference to GR number
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on Jul 28, 2010 9:15 AM

ED not calculating in PO

Dear All,
I am raising a consumable PO in which I am giving only description only. In J1ID for the blank material code and plant combintaion I have maintained chapter ID and for chapter ID tax rate also maintained.
When I am giving the tax code and seen in the Taxes icon, ED is not calculating.
Pls Guide how to calculate the taxes for this scenario. FYI Tax procedure is TAXINJ.
Rgds
Srini

If you are working with -TAXINJ
If basic CIN-TAXINJ setting are proper then check for the master data.
At Master data level
1] First check the Chaprter ID rates Validity Date i.e From date to To data.
2] Check vendor Excise details maitained it or not in -J1ID
3] Maitain Chapter with blank in Material + chapter Id combination.
4]Then check Tax code for Values i.e 100% and 2%,1% are maitained for Conditions.
with regards
Shrinivas gangoor

Tax not calculating in PO

HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

Hi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards

Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
Koutilya

Hi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK

Formulas not calculating

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for