Fund Center in FBCJ

Hi SAP GURU
I have tried through FMDERIVE defult cost center = Fund center but it is not picking in the FBCJ.
kindly advice any suggestion for this
Thanks
JOSH

Hi Josh,
Substitutions will not resolve your issue since funds center is not part of it.
The correct is FMDERIVE like you are doing.
Usually this kind of issue is because you are using transaction type = 'C' (or another one different from R)
Incoming payment from bank. This is defined in transaction FBCJC2.
Please check if this customizing is correct.  Probably the correct transaction type is 'R' Receipts.
This will resolve your inquiry.
For additional information, please check the following notes:
1268001 FI313 - No funds center entered/derived in item &.
666322   Derivation tool in the FM: Trace function
881202   FM derivation tool: Derivation of foreign acct assignments
334559   Customizing field status in Funds Management
684659   FAQs about account assignment objects as of Release 4.70
658163    Acct assignmnt change: Determinatn of new FM acct assignmnt
334559    Customizing field status in Funds Management
I hope it resolves your problem
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Similar Messages

  • Payment to Vendor in FBCJ field Fund & Fund center required

    Dear Experts,
    I have a question, How can we make fields (fund and Fund center) required when we post the payment to the vendor (K) from FBCJ. I checked with field status group it is not working.
    I want to get the warning message if I don't enter or forgot to enter any account assignemnt when I post vendor payment from FBCJ. Just like expemnse payment if I post for expense i will get warning message Account xxx requires an assignment a CO object.
    where I can setup this could any one help in this issue. this request is from my customer.
    Thanks in advance
    Satya

    Hi
    thank you for your reply.
    I defined validations as below but it is not working.
    Prerequisite: Transaction code = 'FBCJ' AND Document Type = 'KZ'
    Check: Funds Center <> '' AND Fund <> ''
    In the debugg I found fileld values of VENDOR, FUND and FUNDS CENTER are not filled in the BSEG table.
    the validation message is showing correctly but even if I entered the required values again asking same entries.
    I am using business transaction PAYMENT TO CREDITOR initially I entered amount, vendor if I try to post system is asking enter the fund and funds center after entering the required fileds again asking same field entries.
    could you suggest any other solution.
    is there any chance to enter our own structure in tab tables field in Validations.
    thanks and regards.
    Satya

  • Unable to derive funds center in F-90 Asset purchase from vendor

    Dear All,
    I have maintained the fund center value in the asset master and also maintained the derviation rule in FMDERIVER for a combination of Cost Center > Funds Center.
    When i try to post asset purchase using F-90 t-code, it is asking me for funds center in the asset line item. The system is not deriving the value from asset master or derivation rule maintained. I am unable to maintain the funds center in the posting as the field is grayed out.
    Request you to kindly provide your valuable suggestion.
    Best regards
    Abishay

    Hello,
    The fund center has to be activated for Account Assignment Type 01 (APC Value Posting)                                                                               
    Maybe note 437076 could help to check the settings in the following IMG activity :
       Activate the account assignment elements for each transaction and 
       account assignment type:                                          
       Asset Accounting -> Integration with the General Ledger ->        
       Additional Account Assignment Objects -> Define Account           
       Assignment Types for Account Assignment Objects                                                                               
    I hope it helps,
    Hélène

  • Derivation of Funds Center from cost center for Asset PR/PO in FM

    Hello Experts,
    We configured new FM area and relevant BCS settings. It is working fine except PR or PO for Account assignment category A.
    Issue: system is not able derive funds center from cost center in the asset master. cost center is not updated in EBKN table for Asset PR.
    we have maintained the following;
    1. Funds center is activated in Asset account assignments
    2. Maintained derivation rule with function module: FMDT_READ_MD_ASSET
    3. Derivation rule for cost center to funds center also maintained
    If maintain funds center manually in PR it is working fine and consuming budget also.
    Requirement: How derive funds center from cost center assigned in asset. I have verified all tickets raised in this forum, but nothing has answered my question.
    Request you to provide solution for above issue.
    Thanks in advance for support.
    Regards,
    Chalapathi

    Hi Venkata,
    You have two derivation rules, first related to Asset function module and second one is related to CC and FC combination.
    You need to maintain the function module derivation rule first then you need to maintain the derivation rule related to combination of CC and FC. Because first you need to derive CC from asset master and then you need to derive fund center with reference to this CC.
    Regards,
    Ankit Agarwal

  • Org Level, fund center/cost center level restriction for tcodes????

    I am looking to see whether org level restriction and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible for certain set of transactions.
    I am using USOBX table for this analysis. This table has a check flag field ( same as in SU24) which says whether the Tcode (program) does the authority check for certain auth objects. Example- X (checked but not maintained in USOBT). This table pulls up several authorization objects under the 'X' category. However, when I do the System trace for the same tcode, all the objects (marked as X) are not captured. Instead only a few are captured.
    Can we rely on the USOBX data or should we do system Trace for every tcode. I am just pulling a report and not creating roles at this point. So trace is time consuming. But data reliability is equally important.
    My objective is to verify whether org level and cost center/fund center level restriction is possible or not for some tcodes.
    Do you have any suggestion to achieve this faster (through USOBX or any other means)?
    Thanks in advance
    Kee

    I would suggest you to check USOBX_C and USOBT_C instead of USOBX and USOBT as it will have your customization as well and not just the standard ones given by SAP.
    Also when check field is X ...it means the object is checked but not maintained for the t-code as you already said but I am not sure how much it will help you as the they will not be pulled by PFCG when you are creating the role until you change the object to Check / maintain . When you do that the check field will be Y and not X. So basically it is the Y one which you need to see.
    Going for trace is time consuming for every t-code and I am not sure if it really needed. When your roles are in testing phase and are tested by the functional team or the team which needs it and if they are missing some object, you can run a trace and find the missing object....
    I am not sure on what basis you want to change some field to Org level ...but typically it is done if you want to do segregation of roles based on these org level. There could be various other reasons and it is better to talk to your functional counterparts before changing a field to Org level.
    for ex : If you want to segregate on company code, you will create co. code as Org level and create roles for different company code.

  • Error while doing miro of network purchase order ( no funds center entered/

    Hi,
    we are facing one problem while doing miro of network  service purchase order. System is giving message 'No funds center entered/derived in item 00030'.
    We have activated funds management in Jul'10. The said network service PO belong to previous year. Also we have changed
    commitment item of GL account related to concerned service order in Jul'10 & posted GRN one in apr'10 & one aug'10.
    System is not allowing to cancel the service entry sheet.
    Can anybody help on this.
    regards
    abhishek

    we had activated the trace facility for FMDEIRIVE & found that all FC/Commitment item derived correctly. But while posting the document it is throwing an error.
    Regards
    Abhishek

  • Error while Updating Fund Center in Work Order

    Hi All,
    In out System, we have integrated PM-FM. in that, we have incorporated a "User-Exit" which populates the User a change-of "Cost Centre" just while saving the order; where the User can insert any other Cost center other than the one already picked & displayed by the System.
    The problem now in FM is that; the initially displayed cost center prior to the update of cost center; is the one that is picked by the FM Derivation Strategy; which does not get updated when the new cost center is updated.
    Hence, although the Order contains a new Cost center; the Fund Center displayed is the one that was mapped to the prior cost center according to the FM Derivation Strategy in FMDerive.
    Kindly help !!
    Thanks in Advance.................
    Regards,
    Pratham

    Sahu
    Can you also post a screen-shot of the error message popup.
    PeteA

  • No Funds Center error while creating Production Order in CO01

    Hi SAP Consultants,
    I am trying to save production order in transaction CO01 but I am getting error saying "No funds center entered/derived in item 00001"
    Diagnosis
    In company code (&2) the component Funds Management is active. This requires the entries or the derivation of a funds center.
    You can use the following elements to derive the funds center: company code / account  or CO object .
    Procedure
    Enter a funds center or ensure that the funds center can be derived from the possible assignments by:
    assigning a funds center in the commitment items- master record or maintaining the assigning of a funds center to the CO object.
    My company is a public sector company and Funds management is active.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Kindly check for item 0001 in the Material Master which Profit Center is maintained and check if a Funds center is assigned to it. This should solve your problem.

  • Commitment Warning w.r.t Fund Center from PO

    Dear All,
    We've Activated Funds Management as per the client requirements.
    But I am facing the following issue w.r.t commitment update.
    Details:
    Creating the PO w.r.t to Fund center & commitment item as A/c Assignment.
    I've created Formal Budget for selected fund center/Commitment item which is assigned in PO
    Tolerance Limit also activated for availability control with 80% warning & 90% as Error Msg.
    Issue:
    But, during creation of PO, even though it is crossing the 100% of assigned budget, availability control is not working due to which system not giving error msg,
    If anyone any idea on this type of issue, please guide me how to resolve this.
    Note:  I've created PO, GR also, but in Commitment/Actual Report under Funds Management, system showing 100% as Available Amount.

    Are you using Former Budgeting or BCS, "Budget Control System"
    If you are using BCS, try reconstructing the budget using FMAVCREINIT
    If you are using Former Budgeting, use FMBV or FM9P

  • Funds Mangement - Fund center derivation error at the time of PO/MIGO

    Hello -
    Generally ,If FM account assignements are available in purchase requisition , same should be carried to purchase order and to the good receipts. But I am getting an error at the time of PO or MIGO that " Fund center not derived'. Why this happening ? What can I do to avoid this problem. can I create a step in the derivation to keep the original FM assignments from the previous documents....is there something to do with field status??
    Thanks in Advance
    Chris

    Hi
    Please read carefully tye warehouse concept
    Excample warehouse concept II
    >At PR no FM update
    >At PO no FM update
    >AT GR no FM update
    >AT consumption on Cost center, WBS or Internal order FM is updated and AVC is checked
    Read the release note of ERP 6 or ERP5 the customising of Warehouse concept is well explained
    In sumary:
    Create a stock commitment item statistically
    Create a warehouse funds center
    Create a funds
    Create a derivation rule for warehouse concept 2
    Create a derivation rule where you have plant, valuation class and warehouse funds center
    Cretae a derivation rule fund>warehouse funds center>stock commitment item
    Go in customising integration to make field status for assignement FM account asignments
    Select PO and PR and make optional the funds, funds cenbter, commitment item
    And when you will create a PR or PO FM data will come automatically
    ciao
    Salvator
    PSM-FM Consultant
    BXL

  • Update Fund & Fund center data in auto generated PR during MRP RUN

    Problem in the MRP auto generated PRs.
    The normal PRs created manually have all relevant fields of fund center viz CO area ,commitment item,Funds center, fund.
    But the problem is with respect to the Purchase Requisitions generated automatically during the MRP RUN.
    How to include the fund centers in MRP generated PRs automatically in the creation stage itself instead of going into change mode using ME52n Transaction code and change it to include fund centers one by one for each line item.
    We require this as we have hundreds of PRs generated every day.

    Hi,
    In order to fulfill this requirement, transaction FM_MRP_PR should be used.
    Please also take a look to FM_MRP_PR on-line documentation :
    The PRs generated from the MRP run are considered as planning documents
    and do not have any impact on the budget. To encumber these PRs in the
    corresponding settlement receivers, you have to execute this program for
    the relevant PRs.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • MM-FM integration. How to stop update of Fund Center and Commitment Item

    Hello!
    Anyone please help. MM-FM integration.
    Our problem is after automatic creation of PR and PO from work orders, and the fund center and commitment item in the PR and PO has been changed/updated by the user, and then we change something in the work order and save it, the fund center and commitment item of the PR and PO goes back to default value (based on FMderive). Is there a way to stop this?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Rona

    It seems like you have selected "Do not overwrite target values" option in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in the derivation rule defined.
    Go through SAP Note 666322, make sure the Trace feature in On and then choose the option "Overwrite Target Values" in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in your derivation rule. After that, see the Difference before and after values in the trace log created after performing the derivation rule.
    I am sure this will help.
    Regards,
    Amar Lal

  • Unable to do the restriction at Fund Center or FM Area when FM is not activ

    Hi,
    we have the following business requirement:
    Background of the issue:
    Field Status variant in Account Assignment category and GL:
    We are in the process of rolling out one of our company codes which is
    in a different instance(server).
    We already have some 130+ company codes running in a different
    instance. This is a kind of Instance consolidation to bring all systems
    under one instance.
    Funds Management has been activated in the company code for which we
    are carrying out the rollout. FM has not been activated for the
    existing company codes.
    Now, the issue is with regard to the field status variants, which can
    be controlled at the company code level and which cannot be controlled
    which is at the client level.
    (i)     The existing company codes have a field status variant which
    has the field status groups having the fields Commitment items and
    Funds center in Suppress mode in the existing instance.
    (ii)     The company to be rolled out has the field status variant which
    has field status groups having the fields Commitment items and Funds
    Center in Optional mode.
    (iii)     On the other hand, there is yet another field status control
    for the Account assignment objects like Cost center, WBS elements, etc.
    in the MM-FI integration area. This is at client level and at present
    the same has the status of u201CSuppressu201D for Commitment items and Funds
    Center. We have changed the same to u201COptionalu201D for the purpose of
    testing the proposed roll out in our existing instance.
    In that case, the status of GL account assignment in above is
    clashing with our client level field status as described in (iii)
    above. As a result, we are forced to change the field status in
    above to optional mode for our existing company codes which we do not
    intend to do.
    When only one company within a group of companies is activated with FM,
    I feel that:
    (i)     At the client level, there is no option for me other than to
    keep the Funds center and commitment items in optional mode
    (ii)     At the GL level, I should be able to keep my field status in
    Suppress mode (If FM is not activated) and in Optional mode (If FM is
    activated) and SAP should be able to take care of the clash in the
    field status at the transaction level in such a scenario.
    The issue is we are able to control the access if FM is activated for a particular company code, where as we are unable to control the access for other company codes where FM is not activated and FM Area is not linked.
    We tried to use the BADI ME_PROCESS_REQ_CUST, but this is applicable for POs only.
    Please look into this  issue and help us in meeting our business requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramakrishna

    Hi Justin,
    Thanks for the extra points.
    Copy and save this bold text some where
    /Applications/iChat.app/Contents/MacOS/iChat -errorLogLevel 7
    This needs to be run in Terminal.
    iChat needs to be shut down to do so.
    Just paste it in Terminal after the Welcome to Darwin message and hit enter.
    It will launch iChat and create an on-going log in the Terminal window.
    You will see the reference to the Harware rules.plist
    Further down you will see the bandwidth found by iChat, followed by the number of Audio and Video Buddies that you can support.
    It goes on.....
    It makes a note of the router that you are connected to.
    After that it will end up lists listening checks until you connect to a Chat.
    This makes this a useful way to find out what iChat can see at it's startup.
    To Stop - Quit iChat in the Normal way.
    Save the Log in a Text editor of some sort. (Post here if required).
    Then Quit Terminal.
    It is a useful tool to highlight some things in the start up phase, (And a reminder to look in specific places) when you think you have looked at all the settings.
    8:12 PM Wednesday; November 15, 2006

  • How a PR/PO will be link to fund center in case of plant purchase

    hello all
    How we can linkt the purchase order or purchase requisition with the fund center in case of plant purchases i.e there is no account assignment in the PR/PO.
    Thanks
    alok gupta

    Hi,
    Please, read basic FM material about the integration:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/f0/ca3e8d260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Eli:

  • Fund center and commitment item not updated

    Hi!
    We are using Funds Management together with SRM. When we change the value of e.g. cost center and not the account assignment itself we do not get an update on fund center. When changing account we do not get an update on commitment item either. This is standard SAP and we have been asked to use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI. Have anyone else had this problem?
    I would really appreciate if anyone have some code for this BADI or any other badi e.g. BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI. It is only important that changes in PO when replicated to back end results in the correct update of commitment item and fund center.
    Sincerely
    Andres

    Solved through BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI

Maybe you are looking for