Funds Management - Reimbursement from Customers

Hi,
The Scenario is that the company will do some expenses which are reimbursable by the customer. i.e. expenses on behalf of customer. For e.g. Travel of employee is reimbursed by the Customer, so at that time Budget should be reduced, but when the customer reimburses that amount to the company budget should be increased. In SD we will be using dummy fund centers.
How Can I map this scenario in FM.
Thanks & Regards,
Jyoti

Hi,
You can implement RIB (Revenue increasing budget) scenario, where the accepted revenue could increase the budget for expenses lines. You can read more here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/77/bb62c092036b408ee52c0e85b9d4ee/frameset.htm
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • Funds management Retraction from SEM to R/3

    Hi Experts,
    Can any one suggest the retraction process for FUNDS MANAGEMENT From SEM to R/3 (I heard that it requres ABAP programme).
    Thanks and regards
    Prasad

    Sorry, I missed to add a my observation that when execute the Planning function with some values in selection of either CRM element or WBS element, it is running fine. However when both are left balnk in the selections it is giving me this error. To handle this case, do we need any thing to transfer characteristics with unassigned values '#' ?
    Cheers,
    Ramz

  • Fund managment period change

    How to change fund managment period from existing (APRIL TO MARCH) TO OCT TO SEPTEMBER.
    WE ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THAT USING
    public cector mgmt
    fund mgmnt govt
    basic setting
    fiscal year setting
    define fiscal year setting
    there we have v3 as april to march and
    v9 as oct to sept
    originally we had assigned v3 to Financial year and to fund mgmt period both.
    but now we want to assign v9 to fund mgmt period.
    But system is not allowing us to do that. How can we achive it and what are the reasons for errors.

    Hi,
    If you already post to FM then you can't change the FY variant. The only way I see is:
    A) Delete all posting.
    B) Change the setting
    C) Reload by "subsequent" transactions.
    In case you direct post to FM (E.G budget) you have to reenter. Alternativerly, if you have mass data you entered, write a small program that download the line items and reload after the changes (you can use CATT or ECATT to load the flat file you create).
    Hope this help you.
    Benni

  • Migration Funds Management from 4.7 to ECC.6.0

    Hi,
    The company is migrating the system from v. 4.7 to ECC 6.0. We have the module FM (Funds Management), but we don't know if this module is still active in ECC 6.0.
    Do you have any information about this? And any documentation to do this migration?
    Thanks in advance
    Lluisa

    Hi Lluisa,
    See note[669764|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/669764]:
    as of release R/3 enterprise, Funds Management is delivered as an add-on, i.e. EA-PS.
    Suggest to check all the release notes for PSM including the ones for EA-PS 110,200,500 and 600
    https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/releasenotes
    As you are an Spanish Public Sector customer, I am also including the link to the available documentation, but if you did not have IS-PS nor ISPSe before, I think most of the specific upgrade tools will not be relevant for you. No matter, just have a look for your information:
    https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/sectorpublico
    Servicios para Sector Público España     -> ISPSe Contabilidad Presupuestaria   > ISPSe Support Packages > EAPSe600  
    And, in EA-PS enhancement package 4, there are additional functions for Spanish customers:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/42/fbded750e61febe10000000a422035/frameset.htm
    > Business Functions in SAP ERP  -> Enterprise Business Functions  -> Accounting>Public Sector Management --> Country-Specific Business Functions -->FI-FM Localization Topics for the Spanish Public Sector
    Maybe this is too much information for now..;)
    Kind regards
    Mar

  • Funds management cube getting data from 4 ods, data not seen in cube

    Hello all,
    I am working on funds management cubes (0PU_C02 and 0PU_C03). These two cubes get data from like 7 or 8 ODS. Can someone tell me which are the ODS which feed to respective cubes. I have the mappings done but i am getting very confused.
    In the ods 0PU_O44 there is RLDNR for Ledger and I can see that data in ODS but when i run load to cube I dont see the ledger data (its direct mapping there are no routines or rules).
    Is there any sequence with wihic we have to load the data?
    Thanks
    Message was edited by: Raj M

    Hi Raj,
    I was going thru the forums who has knowledge in Public sector when i came accross ur forum.Can i get your email id..i have some questions to ask regarding student administration.
    thanks.

  • Fund Management - Issues in Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6

    Hello,
    We are upgrading SAP Application for a client who is on 4.6C to ECC6. The client is currently using Funds Management in 4.6C. With ECC6 I understand that this functionality is moved into Public Sector and is available only on activation of IS-PS Extension Set.
    The question I have is that does this activation impact any other business processes or is just a technical activation.
    What I mean is that if I activate this extension set does the system start doing things differently and needs specific data related to Public Sector which the business users will be required to be entered while doing transactions OR the activation will not impact business processes as such and would work as earlier with Funds management active. (except where there was a change in the functionality between 4.6C to ECC6)
    I would like to know the risks, if any involved in upgrading Funds Management from 4.6C to ECC6.
    Please reply and let me know any question to get more clarity on the issue.
    Best Regards
    Kuldeep

    Hi Kuldeep,
    There are several main issues that have to be addresses when upgrading from 4.6 to ECC6. The main ones are:
    1 - Derivations. The object are no longer connected through tables or master data entries (you may have a table that links Cost Centers to Funds Centers for example). These assignments are now maintained through a flexible derivation tool. These derivation rules have to be maintaind, or the posting addresses will have no FM values and you will not be able to post any documents.
    2 - Inventory purchases. The inventory purchases scenarios are no longer maintained through the customization (you can no longer choose one of the 4 inventory scenarios, and there's no warehouse Funds Center). These are all maintained through derivations.
    3 - BCS. There's a new budgeting and AVC tool called "Budget Control System" (BCS). You can either activate it, or keep working with the old budgeting (called "former" in the customization). The new BCS affords flexibility in budgeting and AVC, including several AVC ledgers.
    More data regarding migrations can be found in documentation. If you want, I can send you the PDF document.
    Best regards,
    Shahaf Yaari
    [email protected]

  • CASH FLOW REPORT FROM FUNDS MANAGEMENT

    Hi All
      I am in the mid of BW implementation for FI and FM reports.
    As part of this i have to create CASH FLOW report..
    Currently the user using a SAP report from , Funds Management, FMEM which points to the structure IFMEISB , Cash Budget Management.
    Is there any datasource is available in FM to access this structure?
    Otherwise any body knows what are tables in FM has to be extracted for this puropes..
    Regards
    Mano

    Hi
    You can check the Financials business contect.
    Funds management
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/71/d3143cb1b8be00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Have a look at these data sources:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b5/12163c240a9440e10000000a114084/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d3/29ae399c1a6651e10000000a114084/content.htm
    Data sources for funds management
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/ba/c8ad3928a07c50e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Regards
    Naveen
    PS: Assigning point to the helpful answers is the way of saying thanks in SDN

  • Funds Management-Derive Fund centre from Cost Centre

    Dear Guru
    In funds management -Derive Fund centre from Cost Centre" i used to have 8000 entries till yesterday. So there were 8000 combinations of fund center with cost center.
    Somehow I can only see 80 today. Somebody might have deleted those.
    Is there any change log availble to see who deleted and when?
    Archit

    Hi,
    I see... Deletion is not logged there, I'm afraid; only modifications on existing entries. Unless, you have specifically defined log status for the relevant FM table, which I doubt. I believe, no one would delete 8000 records just for laugh. Most probable, the entries were deleted with a transport request.
    One more reason to follow my advice and maintain the link in a different manner.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Generating call object from Maintenance order with Fund management

    Dear All,
    we have activated the funds management and assigned the fund center as Mandatory for creation of order.
    But while using the order type in maintenance plan during scheduling ,system is not releasing the call stating incomplete account assingnment ,since there is no provision to specify the Fund center in maintenance plan.
    Any work around
    regards
    thyagarajan
    Edited by: thyagarajan krishnamurthy on Oct 15, 2009 8:11 PM

    Hi
    Thanks for your response .
    In my client we have activated the customer at save event to check the Fund center and settlement receiver to be same.Hence while saving the order system will check prompt an error if it was different.
    I think due to the above exit ,system is not able to release the call object.
    We cannot able to cancel the exit also.
    Any clue?
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Travel Management & Funds Management integration

    Hello Experts,
    During creation of a travel request & when I am entering amount in "Estimated Costs" field, I am getting an error message as "Error creating commitment: Trip status has been set to 'open'. Message no. PTRA_WEB_INTERFACE098". This is due to Funds Management activation by the FICO team. My client requires budget check in Travel Management.
    From my side I have created an expense type with details like:-
    Short name: for example, Estimated Costs
    ○  Travel Expense Category: Other
    ○  Amounts are: Estimated Costs, No Reimbursement to Employee
    Do I need to maintain symbolic & G/L for the same? Is there any other config I am missing.
    Please help to solve the issue.
    Regards,
    Daniel

    Can you check for config in V_T706B1  for Estimated Costs  with name should be  ESTC
    you need to change it  ESTC.
    If you have activated the integration to funds management, the system tries to create a commitment for the entered estimated cost. For this it is necessary, as the error message says, to create an expense type for the estimated cost in V_T706B1 with the use 'Estimated Cost'.
    This expense type is then inserted in the trip and later on, when your create the expense report, you are forced to delete this
    expense type again.
    If you have the funds management active, you need to go to maintainance view V_T706B1 and create an expense type for which you choose out of the 'special use' drop down box the value 'extimated cost, no reimbursement'.
    This was new functionality with ERP2005 but this is unusual as almost all PTRA_WEB_INTERFACE174 or error messages as you see are the result of incorrect definition of estimated cost in V_T706B1 - is there an entry for this in V_T706B4 by any chance that would cause the inconsistency?
    Hope this could help!
    Thanks

  • Funds Management - Reconstruct payment data

    Hello,
    I have implement Funds Management with Multi-Year Budget Execution and update profile 00101 (posting date) and realize that my commitment item for vendor account was 40 and not 60 so I have some invoices that are not updated with the payment in FM. How can I reconstruct my data? I used the report RFFMRPFI but is not working as I expect. I still have teh invoice open in FM.
    Thank you,
    Angela Costa

    Hi Angela,
    There are only 2 ways to make a FI payment be a payment also in FM (value type 57) and it is not related to the financial transaction of the commitment item.
    1 - Run of the Payment Selection Program (report RFFMS200)
    SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> Funds Management Government -> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration -> Integration -> Define Settings for Payment Transfer
    Please check the documentation icon available in front of this line.
    2 - Payment Update Online
    You check if you are using payment update online in transaction OF29.
    It seems to be that you are not using Payment Update online otherwise the value type 57 would be generated automatically in FM table. Therefore, please run the report of item 1.
    I dont know in which release you are but from ECC600 on, customers are not allowed to use program RFFMS200 but only use the payment update online.
    Therefore, I will give you some additional information regarding Payment Update Online:
    CONSULTING NOTES
    ================
    882379  - FMPU_R: Recommendations for the online payment update
    435328  - Analysis programs for the payment update
    1234391 - Incorrect payment update in FM or in NewGL split information
    1030497 - SAP ERP 6.0: Public sector scenarios in new general ledger
    Please check carefully the notes. Since Release EA-PS 6.00, only the online payment update in Funds Management using the new general ledger with document splitting is supported. Therefore, you must have NewGl with document splitting. You will find additional information in the PDF attached and also in the notes mentioned above.
    I hope this helps.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • Implications of implementing fund-management

    Hi All,
    Please guide me, is it advisable to implement fund management, in case, New G/L functionality is already active and lots of transaction data already exist??
    If yes, what are the implications of implementing the fund management in case of New G/L functionality is already active and the system is already live for the past 3 years.
    I have read the SAP notes, 906397 & 840783 but still would like to have the expert guidance from the people already work on this issue because by reading these notes it looks like a complicated issue as the existing FI data seems to get impacted a lot.
    Your help will be greatly appreciated.
    Note: We are on ECC6.0 and we are not a public sector enterprise.
    Thanks & Regards
    Puneet Agrawal

    Hi Puneet,
    Please check the link below:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/DefinitionofLeadingLedgerforPublicSector+Customers
    This Wiki page was created to refer customers not only about the concept but also how to resolve error FAGL_LEDGER_CUST023 (in the end of the page).
    Note 906397 is a reference documentation for this report, for additional information.
    I believe that this will resolve your issue.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • System error in Funds Management update

    Dear you,
    Have anyone seen the following when updating FM from FI document:
    "System error:Funds management update (FMRI, CHECK_WE_RE)"
    Any ideas what to do?
    Thanks
    Sonja

    Hi there,
    The update problem occurs both if we try to post with FB50L or if I try to make a transfer of FI postings in FM. This all happens in the new installation where we plan to use new GL and FM.
    This note you gave did not ring a bell for me
    The error message is FI057. But we have not yet found a suitable note.
    Therefore any ideas are still welcomed.

  • Funds Management cut over of Open PR and PO

    Hi,
    In case of cutover, we are using following link to update FM account assignment in open PR/PO.
    SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Select Documents
    and
    SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Convert Worklist
    1) But in this case, for open PO of which GR is not done FMRP_RW_BUDCON report is not updated after doing above mentioned process. when I make GR, commitment get updated in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report. This does not show actual status of budget consumption as budget consumption is shown at the time of GR only.
    2) If GR is already done for PO and after doing above mentioned process, if GR get reversed then Negetive commitment shows in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report and after deletion of that respected PO, commitment of PO gets zero. But negetive GR commitment remains open which leads to wrong status of budget consumption. e.g. GR of Rs 5000 is reversed. Then report shows two documents as -5000 for GR reversed and 5000 for PO commitment getting open. IF I reversed this PO then PO commitment of 5000 become zero. but GR reversing amount -5000 still remains open. So it shows less consumption of budget by Rs.5000.
    Do I am missing any process. Suggest.

    Hi,
    Firstly, after you convert the open commitments, you'll need to run FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct AVC. FMRP_RW_BUDCON will then reflect the converted commitments.
    Secondly, based on your posting, it seems that you do not want PO commitments (VT 51) to be counted as budget consumption. You can achieve this in the ledger 9H configuration:
    Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availability control > Settings for availability control ledger > Define filter settings for commitment/actual values. You will want to exclude both value type 50 and 51 from ledger 9H. After you change the setting, you will need to run FMAVCREINIT again.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management

    Hi,
    We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
    There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
    Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
    Message no. AW851
    ABC - Company code
    000127000000 - asset number
    DUMMY - Fund center
    suggest.

    alex ice wrote:
    Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
    > 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
    > 3 remove FC from asset master data
    Hi Alex, how are u!?
    I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
    Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
    All very interesting notes :P
    But... I couldn't find the solution
    I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
    Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
    Thanks a lot!
    Regards from Argentine.

Maybe you are looking for