G/L account settlement for AuC

Hello everybody,
I´m trying to settle an Asset under construction to a G/L account that is not a Cost element (a balance sheet account).
The problem is that the Profit Center is not being assigned to the FI document. The system doesn´t take it from the Investment Order in this case. I donu2019t have that problem when I settle to Cost Centers or Fixed Assets.
Important things to consider:
1) The object Investment Order is active for the company code, but is not relevant for balance sheet accounts, that flag is not available for Investment Orders. (Additional Account Assignment objects section in the customizing)
2) If I fill the Internal Order field with the value of the Investment Order everything works perfectly, the Profit Center is assigned. But I want top avoid that extra work, it doesn´t make any sense to me.
Any ideas?
Thank you very much,
Plácido

Hi,
Dont know why your substitution is not working at creation of order. However, if you were to do it only subsequently, why dont you use the KOK4 to release it automatically for you. The selection variant has to be designed to pickup the created orders and set to release status. This should trigger your substitution.
Thanks
Jagdish

Similar Messages

No AUC shown on settlement for WBS

The WBS shows status of AUC but when you go to the the WBS and check the settlement rule, there is none shown. If you go from the project WBS to the AUC (Extras>Asset under construction)the AUC was created.
The account assignment indicator is set and the investment profile is assigned to the WBS and provides for an asset under construction.
I am using t-code CJ20N. Why isn't the AUC shown on the settlement for the WBS?

Hi,
Settlement rule (For Partial Settlement i.e.Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC) will get populated once you do the Partial Settlement (i.e. Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC) through CJ88 / CJ8G.
Once you do the partial settlement you can see the settlement rule by Edit -
> Cost -
>Settlement rule.
By investment profile you can generate the AUC asset nos against the WBSE once you release the project. But those AUC asset no will only get reflected in settlement rule once you do the partial settlement (i.e. Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC).
Thanks & regards,
Pradip

Block settlement to auc for downpayment

Hi SAP Friends,
There is a specific requirement in one of our project.
In an investment project, advance payment is issued against a service PO with ref to WBS. The requirement is to block the settlement to AUC for this advance payment only until service entry acceptance is made. Other commitment in the WBS should go as usual without problem with regular path of setlement to AUC and from AUC to Fixed asset.
Regards
Srinivasan

Hi Srinivasan,
Please check if this could be of any help to you.
Specify Capitalization of AUC/Down-Payment
In this step, you determine how the system will deal with down payments on AuCs and their closing invoice during the settlement (capitalization) of the AuC. This system setting is particularly relevant for respresenting down payments from previous years in the asset history sheet.
Standard Settings
The system capitalizes down payments as follows in the standard system:
If you capitalize a down payment from the previous year and the closing invoice from the current year together, the amount of the down payment is transferred with the transaction type for asset data from previous years, and only the difference between the closing invoice and the down payment is transferred with the transaction type for current acquisitions.
Activities
If you want to change the default setting, you must set the indicator for the capitalization of assets under construction without down payments. If this indicator is set, the system ignores down payments during the line item settlement of assets under construction. The total amount of the closing invoice is always transferred with the transaction type according to its posting year.
SPRO - Asset Accounting - Transactions - Capitalization of Assets under Construction - Specify Capitalization of AUC/Down-Payment
Indicator transfer down payments from previous years
When you set this indicator, the system ignores downpayments during the line item settlement of assets under construction. The total amount of the closing invoice is then always transferred to the capitalized asset using the transaction type based on the year of the closing invoice.
Use
This has the following result:
There is an opposite effect when the indicator is not set, and you capitalize a downpayment from a previous year along with the closing invoice from the current year. In this case, the system transfers the amount of the downpayment from the previous year using a transaction type for old assets data. It transfers the difference between the total amount of the closing invoice and the downpayment using a transaction type for new acquisitions.
Regards
Vinayak.

Accounting Treatment for CWIP (AUC)

Please Explaing me the Accounting Treatment for Capital Work In Progress.
what are the accounts we need to create for CWIP ( AUC ), & Whats the treatment in SAP.
As per my Knowledge when an asset under con, following entries will be effected.
1. 01.04.06 to 31.03.2007. ( Asset Under Construction ).
    CWIP Exp (P&M) A/c Dr 5000
        To Bank A/c                       5000
(For Exp incurred for CPWIP)
2. Capitlized on 01.04.2007.
      Plant & Machinery A/c     5000
           To CWIP Exp (P&M)             5000
( being Asset has been capitalized on 01.04.2007)
please guide me whether the above details correct or not.
if wrong please send me the procedure for CWIP.

Your entries are correct. In SAP you can settle AUC in two ways
Ist Method
1. Create AUC under 4000 asset class
2. Make postings to AUC through f-90
3. Make distribution rule using T Code AIAB
4. Settle the AUC using TCode AIBU
In step (3) you can distribute the amount spent on AUC to two or more assets otherwise you can give only one asset and then settle the AUC through AIBU.
2nd Method
1. Create an investment order (KO01)
2. System automatically creates AUC under asset class 4001
3. Enter distribution rule in the same screen ( like in the (3) above) or just give a cost center or an asset.
4. Post payments through F-90 and give the order number in that screen
5. Then settle the AUC using TCode KO88
Radha

BADIs or BTEs for reverse account settlement

Hi experts,
Can you please suggest me some BADIs / BTEs for reverse account settlement? it is really very urgent.

Hi Park,
Just make sure that you have settled this asset through AIAB/AIBU, then you are able to reverse it through AIST. If yes, then the given asset number 220000391 is not AUC number. Just give the AUC number then you will be able to reverse the settlement.
Please do inform me if its works.
Regards
Javed

KO88 - Error when settling for Cost Center AND Auc for the same Internal Or

Hi Experts,
We need to configure Investment Internal Orders that could settle to both Cost Center and Auc, but each assignments with different Source Cost Elements
We did the following:
1. Created Auc Class
2. Created Investment Profile "IMOBIL" and assigned to Auc Class, flagging Auc
3. Created Allocation Structure "CV" with two assignments:
01, Source = Cost elements 7000000000 to 7999999999, receiver AUC "by cost element"
02 Source = Cost elements 4000000000 to 4999999999, receiver CTR "by cost element"
4. Created Model Order, filling the Investment Profile IMOBIL created in step 2.
5 Created Settlement Profile ZCV0001, assigning Allocation Strucutre CV, allowing CTR and AUC for receivers, default receiver is "FXA", doc type "AA".
6 Created ORder Type CV01, assigning Settlement Profile ZCV0001.
When I post only for Asset Expenses (Source Cost element 7, Assigment 01), the settlement through KO88 correctly settles to AUC, and also creates the settlement rule for cost center (i'm using the strategy to create from Responsible Cost Center).
But when I post for Asset Expenses (cost elements 7, receiver AUC) AND General Expenses (Source Cost element 4, receiver CTR), KO88 generates an error KD506, saying that for Assigment 02 - AUC I didnt define a settlement cost element.
1. Assignment 02 is not AUC, is CTR;
2. I flagged "by cost element", so I don't need a settlement cost element. And also, I was able to post to AUC when the source posting was only for cost element 7.
Did you face any problem like this?
I cannot find out what is the missing configuration, or if it is a program error...
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Hi Ajay
I already created Source Structure and assigned to my Setllement profile (so I assigned Allocation Structure AND Source Structure).
I don't understand when you say that I need to assign the Source Sutrcture in each rule....because the Source structure is in the Settlement Parameters valid for both rules...
When I post to Asset Expenses only for the internal Order, the 2 rules (CTR and AUC) are created when I run KO88 (but only AUC rule is settled). This is OK.
The problem is when I post for both General Expenses AND Asset Expenses, the system is not recognizing that I have 2 source structures, neither is findind that for CTR AND AUC the Settlement cost elements are the original cost elements.
I'm thinking about changing message KD506 to warning, do you know if this can help?
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Settlement rule for AUC

Dear SAP gurus,
In AIAB, I have assigned the settlement rule for AUC asset id. However I am not able to see the settlement rule assigned in As03. Is there any report

Hi,
you can see the settlement rule only in AIAB.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Jun 15, 2010 12:52 PM

ORD to AUC settlement for previous year

Hi All,
We have a scenario wherein some expense exists on the Internal order for 2014. The Asset fiscal year has been changed to 2015.
While trying to settle the ORD to AUC for current year, we get a message to do the settlement for previous year.
I checked the SAP notes, it recommended:
1. To do a PRE settlment to Cost Center/receiver in 2014,
2. Manual reposting of cost from the receiver to ORD in 2015, and
3. AUC settlement in 2015.
Please suggest if there is any other way to do it with/without opening the previous fiscal year.

Hi Pankaj,
Check the settle parameters of the order, have you defined settlement type as "periodic settlement" for the asset. If yes, add another line for full settlement for it. Then do settlement for 2015 with processing type as "Automatic", then system will post to 2015 for the asset.
Regards,
Mukthar

Automatic settlement rules for AUC

Hi.
I want to create the automatic settlement rules for AUC settlement instead of entering the setllement rules manually.
can anyone provide me the configuration steps required for automatic settlement rules.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Hi ,
Path: Spro - controlling - Internal orders - Actual postings - Settlement - Automatic generation of settlement rules
Can anyone please provide me the details how to configure in this path and in which scenario is it useful.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Internal Order Settled to AUC reverse process

Dear Gurus,
I had a hard time to think how to do the processes over and over again.
The current process is:
Every month the internal order (investment and real order) will collect the expense on AUC and settle to the AUC.
At the end of year, the AUC will be settled to Fix Asset by internal order settlement rules.
Now what if the settled expense was not correct. For example, in 2009, I created the IO and settled the IO to AUC in several months. But in 2010, I found the expense in IO shall not be settled to AUC, the expense was only the overheads. ( The AUC was not settled to Fix Assets). Just like I wanna reverse the settlement in 2009.
So it would be like this in a flow chart.
IO-> AUC->FX
Now I need to do this:
AUC->IO->GL
For IO->GL, I have figured out that I can change the settlement rule profile and make the GL account allowed.
But for AUC->IO , I have no idea and almost burn my brain on it.
Could you please help to throw light ?
Emma

Hi,
I tried 2 write offs, please help to see whether I am doing right. Thank you!
I tried to reverse the document but it was not allowed.
I am thinking to post a document like the following:
1. Doc in 2009
50 8910000000 settlement AUC             2,964,800.00-        Order:C1BIC83002
70 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00
2. What I want to post:
40 8910000000 settlement AUC         2,964,800.00      C1BIC83002
75 3270600041 000327000032 0000    2,964,800.00-
But it gave me an error when I enter the asset number.
Asset is investment measure, transaction type not allowed
Message no. AK005
Diagnosis
Asset   that is to be posted is an investment measure. You are not allowed to post transactions that affect acquisition value using the current transaction.
Procedure
Check the asset and transaction type 160.
I am not sure which transaction type is correct.
Emma.

Value wrongly settled on AUC from WBS

Hello Experts
We are working on ECC 6.0.
We are using WBS to settle values on AUC & FA.
The issue is some values which were not to be capitalized have been wrongly settled on certain AUCs in previous FY 2009 (debit baalnce).
1. So is it possible to reverse the settlement of previous FY 2009 in current FY 2010?
2. If NO, then can we take out the values from AUC by some other way? I'd tried passing a FI entry using F-91 with posting key 75(credit) for AUC but system doesn't allow. Am i suppose to use some specific Transaction Types for AUC? However passing such manual entries are allowed for FA.
Please suggest.
Regards
Kapil

You have to reverse it and post again in 2009.
The differences in FI you can post with the transaction ABF1 (SAP note 69225) and reverse in 2010. The only point is that then on the end of the years AA is not in line with the values on your G/L account!

Should project down payment value settle to AUC

Dear all
i have two questions when settle the project to AUC
for example, the material cost for project A-01 in Dec is 2000 CNY
and down payment for project A-01 in Dec is 1000CNY
when i do the project settlement for Dec, the AUC value is 3000CNY
that is the total of material cost and down payment.
but i want to exclude the down payment value from AUC value when doing the settlement, how can i do?
the second question is, when i test run the settlement and check the sender,
i find the sender is 3000CNY with materil cost element for example 600900
but actually, it is not correct.
i created the cost element for down payment, but i can not see the line item.
how should i do? thanks a lot.
judy

the down payment ideally should be a financial transction and should not be a debit on the project
so ideally your material cost of 200 CNY should be transferred to AuC on settlement
if you are using the WBS to debit then I wiuld suggest that you use PREliminary settlement - add a settlement rule PRE to G/L account - the account for down payment - you will need to set up the source structure and add that in the settlement rue
This way 1000 CNY goes to G/L and the rest to AuC

WBS settlement wiht AUC

Hello,
Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Lakshmi.

Hi,
Please follow above mentioned points
Allocation structure added settlement with FXA. -- Path - SPRO - IMG - Investment Management - Projects as Investment Measures - Settlement -- Maintain Allocation Structures -create on Allocation structure - and assignment - 010 -- Material & service cost -- and select - click on - source - give Cost elements - from - to
and click on settlement cost element - give receiver category -- FXA - check box for By cost element -- and save it ,
2.Maintain Settlement Profiles -- Define Settlement Profile -- XX - WBSE Settlement Profile
    select radio button - to be settled in full , give allocated structure ,
     Default object type FXA Asset
     select all indicators -- and give other parameter -- Document type -- AA or as per requirement
     and Assign Settlement Profile to Project Profile
3.New Asset class creation with line items settlement     --   Investment Management -- Projects as Investment Measures -- Master Data --Assets under Construction --Define Asset Classes ==
      give- Account determination -- asset class , scr layout rule -- capital investment measure ,
give number range --whichever is created
status of AuC -- select radio button -- Investment Measure
Save it ,
Now you can create Project -   Run -- CJ88 for settlement
Thanking you
Regards
Mahesh

Settling of AUC

hi,
Pls tell me if am correct or wrong for the following scenerio.
For example, my client pays down payment for an asset (worth 50,000)---
10,000 in jan
10,000 in feb
and makes a payment of rs 30,000 in March when he recieves the Asset.and he will capitalise the asset from march.
in this case am creating an AUC in jan and post all the downpayments on to it and finally in march i will create an fixed asset and settle the AUC to this Fxd Asset. Tell me if this process is correct, can i take the down payments being done on to AUC.
thanking u
urs Sai

hello,
please follow the below steps in customising:
1.Entering Alternative Reconciliation Accounts for Down Payments
2.allow downpayment tranasction types in assetclass- you have to select 15 downpayment and add your asset class here
3. assign gl account AO90 for Aquisition downpayments. this account will be recon accoutn as assetss
4.define special GL account for vendors and do the determination for vendors:- The account has to be set as reconciliation account for vendors.
Tax Category -: The net down payment is displayed on this down payment account
5. for the settlement you have create Define/Assign Settlement Profiles
6. assign the settlement profile to company code
7. Specify Capitalization of AUC/Down-Payment.
in customising.. then post downpayment with M special gl indicator.
hope you got the answer, please reward me.
thanks

Internal order posted and settled to auc in incorrect ccode and fiscal year

Hi,
We created an internal order in ian ncorrect company code and settled the cost to AUC in previous fiscal year.
I would like to know what options do you recommend to move the AUC cost from incorrect company code to internal order in a correct company in the current fiscal year. Our AUC account is set up as control account and cannot be manually posted to.
I understand Internal order settlement to AUC for previous fiscal period cannot be reversed in the current year?.
Kindly advise
Umang

Hi
Select the Internal order > Reverse the settlement in the same year...(KO88)
Try to transfer the balance from this IO to new IO in the other co code from (F-02)..
You need to have Inter Co clearing accounts in the IMG....
now settle the new IO to new asset (AUC) in the other company
Br, Ajay M

G/L account settlement for AuC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for