GWTDOMAIN Service request not forwarded to remote site gwerrno(402019)

Hi
my tuxedo sometime take errors as followed:
084405.guzqz2!GWTDOMAIN.11056: LIBGW_CAT:1029: ERROR: Service request not forwarded to remote site:"TPESVCERR - server error while handling request" gwerrno*(402019)*
084521.guzqz2!GWTDOMAIN.11056: LIBGW_CAT:1029: ERROR: Service request not forwarded to remote site:"TPESVCERR - server error while handling request" gwerrno(402019)
OS: SCO Open Server506
tuxedo version: 6.5
patchlev: 455
it will come OK each time 10-20 minutes after it take such errors.
I checked the pq and IPCs . there seems to be no blocked process or queqes .
have anybody solved problem like this?
Please help. Thanks a lot
=======================================
pq
Prog Name Queue Name # Serve WkQueued # Queued Ave. Len Machine
C00000 00001.00015 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
BBL 140000 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
DMADM 00001.00010 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
WSL 00001.00005 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
GWTDOMAIN gwgrp 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
C00000 00001.00011 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
B31296 00003.00060 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
GWADM 00001.00020 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
================================
IPCS
ipcs -a
IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Sep 25 09:03:30 2008
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP CBYTES QNUM QBYTES LSPID LRPID STIME RTIME CTIME
Message Queues:
q 16141 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 27406 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 21263 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 22288 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 4881 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11055 11054 23:11:32 23:11:32 23:11:32
q 8466 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11054 11055 23:11:32 23:11:32 23:11:32
q 22291 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11065 11056 9:01:36 9:01:36 23:11:32
q 13588 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11056 11059 9:01:33 9:01:33 23:11:32
q 277 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 24854 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11062 10:53:01 10:53:01 23:11:32
q 18711 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 24856 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 29465 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 11546 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
q 29467 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11063 9:01:26 9:01:26 23:11:33
q 15132 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
q 15133 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11057 11064 16:04:23 16:04:23 23:11:33
q 6942 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11065 9:01:33 9:01:33 23:11:33
q 29471 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
q 11040 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
q 29473 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
q 15138 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11068 11:09:39 11:09:39 23:11:33
q 15651 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:34
q 7460 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:34
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NATTCH SEGSZ CPID LPID ATIME DTIME CTIME
Shared Memory:
m 0 0x000018e5 --rw-rw-rw- root sys root sys 2 23228 547 549 11:44:34 no-entry 11:44:34
m 12307 0x0002c309 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 23 791012 11049 11150 8:59:50 8:59:56 23:11:30
m 12308 0x00000000 rw----- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 4 1568 11050 11053 23:11:32 no-entry 23:11:32
m 12309 0x00000000 rw----- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 2 69967 11055 11056 23:11:32 no-entry 23:11:32
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NSEMS OTIME CTIME
Semaphores:
s 26009 0x0002c309 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 3 9:03:21 23:11:30
s 26010 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
s 26011 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
s 13012 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
s 26013 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
s 26014 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 28 7:55:00 23:11:32
Edited by: user7335851 on 2008-9-25 上午2:19

There's a similar case to that in which the solution was to upgrade the patchlev of Tuxedo software. The latest RP for Tuxedo 6.5 resolve some issues related to GWTDOMAIN process.
501. CR266129 Tuxedo 6.5 RP496: LIBGW_CAT:1029 Service request not forwarded - TPELIMIT (S-34477)
517. CR342496 Tx 6.5 [propagation] pq in tmadmin report too large number for GWTDOMAIN, not match ipcs results (S-42376)
Many things related to domains have been fixed.
I hope that solves your problem.
Regards.

Similar Messages

File does not exist on remote site, yet it does

I have been trying to understand how Dreamweaver handles remote files in CS5.
My server is setup as a remote server and a test server.
I open the remote file, it offers to get dependencies, so I click yes.
I click on Live view, then it tries to show me the following url
http://my_site.com/public_html/path/to/my/file/file.php
It should not put public_html in the path, and I did not specify this in my site setup. My root setting is /.
Anyway, If I change the url manually, then it shows correctly. Then it offers to discover dunamically linked files, which I agree to.
Now it tells me that 'Dynamically-related files could not be resolved because the site definition is not correct for this server'
If I try to open one of the files that it has discovered, I am told that it is not on the disk, so would I like to 'get it', so I agree.
Finally, I am told that 'Get operation failed since linked-file.php does not exist on remote site'
I suspect that this is all to do with my site definition, but I fiddled with the settings and can't resolve this. I think that the whole problem goes back to Dreamweaver's insistance on putting public_html in the path, but I can't stop it doing so.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
ian

Hi,
Well, yes I did manage to fix the dynamically linked resources issue. As mentioned above, I did need to mention public_html in my Root Directory setting in server setup (silly of me).
I had tried this at first, but it didn't work, as I had the server set as a test server and not a remote server, anyway, i now have it set as both and all is well.
Except that, the first issue that mentioned is still with me: namely, dreamweaver mentions the public_html in the url path when on live view, which is not correct and I don't know where it is inferring this from. I can change it manually, but this doesn't seem right to me. Am I still missing a setting?
In anwer to the questions:
1) My setting (now) in the Root Directory setting in DW is: /public_html/
2) My actual path on the server (that i mention in php scripts) is: /home/login_name/public_html//path/to/my/file/file.php
[In the advanced settings of DW site setup on the Local Info page I have set Links relative to Document option, although it does not seem to make a difference when I change it to Site Root.]
Any suggestions appreciated.
Thanks
Ian

How to IPsec site to site vpn port forwarding to remote site?

Hi All,
The scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A. Would you please advise the solution for that?
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname Laverton
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
logging message-counter syslog
no logging buffered
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa session-id common
clock timezone PCTime 10
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1119949081
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1119949081
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1119949081
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1119949081
certificate self-signed 01
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
69666963 6174652D 31313139 39343930 3831301E 170D3132 30363135 30343032
30385A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 31313939
            quit
dot11 syslog
ip source-route
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.50
ip dhcp pool DHCP_LAN
   network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 192.168.1.1
   dns-server 61.9.134.49
   lease infinite
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
object-group network VPN
description ---Port Forward to vpn Turnnel---
host 192.168.2.99
username admin01 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$6pJE$ngWtGp051xpSXLAizsX6B.
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key mypasswordkey address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
match address 100
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1
archive
log config
hidekeys
no ip ftp passive
interface ATM0
description ---Telstra ADSL---
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
pvc 8/35
tx-ring-limit 3
encapsulation aal5snap
protocol ppp dialer
dialer pool-member 1
dsl operating-mode auto
interface FastEthernet0
interface FastEthernet1
interface FastEthernet2
switchport access vlan 10
shutdown
interface FastEthernet3
interface Vlan1
description ---Ethernet LAN---
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip tcp adjust-mss 1420
interface Vlan10
ip dhcp relay information trusted
ip dhcp relay information check-reply none
no ip dhcp client request tftp-server-address
no ip dhcp client request netbios-nameserver
no ip dhcp client request vendor-specific
no ip dhcp client request static-route
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
interface Dialer0
description ---ADSL Detail---
ip address negotiated
ip mtu 1460
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
encapsulation ppp
ip tcp adjust-mss 1420
dialer pool 1
dialer-group 1
ppp chap hostname [email protected]
ppp chap password 0 mypassword
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000
ip dns server
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.99 80 interface Dialer0 8000
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.2.99 9100 interface Dialer0 9100
ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_1 interface Dialer0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_2 interface Dialer0 overload
ip access-list extended NAT
remark CCP_ACL Category=16
remark IPSec Rule
deny   ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 remark CCP_ACL Category=4
access-list 100 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 101 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 101 deny   ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map SDM_RMAP_1 permit 1
match ip address NAT
route-map SDM_RMAP_2 permit 1
match ip address 101
control-plane
line con 0
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
transport input telnet ssh
scheduler max-task-time 5000
end
Your help would be very appreciated!
PS: I know it is easier if i config Site A as the VPN server but in out scenario, we need to access printer from internet over static WAN IP of site A.
Thanks,
Thai

Is there anyone can help please?

Exchange 2010 Free busy not working from remote site to main site "exception message is: Could not find a base address"

Hi all , I have an exchange 2010 SP 2 environment with 2 sites , the remote site FL free busy has NEVER worked and I get this error on the remote site , is this related ?
thanks
Log Name: Application
Source: System.ServiceModel 3.0.0.0
Date: :
Event ID: 3
Task Category: WebHost
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: SYSTEM
Computer: FL-CAS1.WOMBAT.LOCAL
free bust works from WITHIN the remote (FL ) site , but NEVER to the main (WASH) site , it has Never worked ,I am thing that this error is related
thanks I have no idea how to fix
Description:
WebHost failed to process a request.
Sender Information: System.ServiceModel.ServiceHostingEnvironment+HostingManager/17256489
Exception: System.ServiceModel.ServiceActivationException:
The service '/EWS/exchange.asmx' cannot be activated due to an exception during compilation. The exception message is: Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding CustomBinding. Registered base address schemes
are [https].. ---> System.InvalidOperationException:
Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding
++++

Hi
This issue could be with corruption in Autodiscover and web services virtual directory
Replace Web.config file for Autodiscover and web services virtual directory from the other working site
Delete and Recreate Autodiscover and web services virtual directory
Do this only on the affected site
Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on http://exchangequery.com Thanks Sathish
(MVP)

Service Requests not resolving

Good Morning TechNet Experts,
I have been having an issue with service requests and I'm one week away from deployment. Basically, I had no need for a "Review" activity, we implement service requests the same way we implement incidents. An analyst opens a ticket for customer,
once service has been applied they should resolve the service request. With incidents this is easy, you just change the incident status to resolved...
However, with Service Requests I created a new template that did not require the "Approval" activity, only the "Apply Service" activity. My Idea was when an analyst is finished with the ticket, he/she just marks the "Apply Service"
activity as completed and the service request can move to "Completed" status.
Although the activity is being marked as completed, the ticket is not changing status. Some are stuck in "In Progress" and some are stuck in "New" status (even though the activity is showing as completed....). These have been stuck for
more than 24 hours now... when this actually goes into production a week from now even 5 minutes is a long time.
What can I do to solve this? I am open to implementing a new procedure if required. Thanks in advance!

Hi,
First of all, it looks like you are having an issue with your workflows. Please restart the HealthService (Microsoft Monitoring Agent) and check if the workflows restart. Do other workflows run (e.g. notification subscriptions)?
Secondly, if you are using service requests with only one manual activity, I believe the handling is a little bit complicated for your analysts. Why don't you remove all activities completely from your SR template? The service request will then go to status
"Submitted" once created, and the analyst can use the task "Complete" to complete the SR without having to worry about activities.
HTH,
Dieter

Service Requests not displaying on Service Request HomePage

Hi
i have been performing operations like inserting new Service Request, Getting list of Service Requests and Updating Service Requests via web service integration.
Everything was working fine till 2 days ago. Suddenly today my Service Request HomePage does not show any of my earlier service request records??? However, when i filter for them using the SR Number i am able to view them.
Also i get the list of service requests and i am also able to insert requests but the new records do not show in the homepage. Worst of alll, i am unable to update any of my earlier records bcoz the crm is not able to find the matching SRNumber!
This is very confusing. Can someone please tell me how i can fix this problem?
Thanks,
Saket

did you try to restart the Microsoft Monitoring Agent?
Antoine AL Ibry

Inbox Search - status for service request not updated

Hi,
In inbox search, the status change for a service request does not reflect until the user log offs or opens the service request in edit mode. PFB the steps followed. (Two users are monitoring the service request but is being processed only by one)
Web UI window 1(User 1): I open the inbox search result page. Service requests are displayed with the status field
Web UI window 2(User 2): In a separate window, the service request is approved by changing the status of the service request to Approved.
Web UI window 1(User 1): In the inbox result screen, i click on search for the same search criteria, but still the old status of the service request(updated in window 2) is displayed.
Observation:
1. If I open the service request, the service request still has the old status. If i click on edit, the new status is displayed. If i click on Back button (without clicking on edit), the new status is refelected for the service request in the inbox result page now.
2. If I log off and again open the inbox result, the new status of the service request is reflected.
3. The status of the service request is updated in the database immediately user 2 changes the status.
There is no enhancement done for the inbox search. The behavior is for standard inbox result.
Please provide any pointers to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Radhika
Edited by: Radhika Chuttani on Jan 5, 2011 7:13 AM

Radhika,
This is standard behavior in the SAP inbox. The reason is that SAP buffers search results in the Inbox in order to improve performance. So even though you hit "search" again, SAP does not update the search results because this search has already been executed in this session. Clicking "End" or logging off refreshes the buffer.
SAP released a note to update the "Responsible Employee" in the Inbox without requiring the user to log off. You can see their explanation and the solution here:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1465966
If you want to enable inbox refresh every time a search is executed, you will probably have to do custom coding. My guess is that you may be able to leverage the CRM_IC_INBOX_BADI. Let me know if this much info is enough or if you want further details on how to technically achieve this.
Rahul

TREX - CRM Service request not showing

Hi everyone,
Per our understanding, TREX is linked with the button "Find related problems" on the 'More' button available on the Header tab.
We are using service request (SRV copied to ZCAS) to create incident. Our purpose is to be able to display the other service request (ZCAS) that would have some similarities (categorization, BP,...).
To do that, we have customized the following transaction in the spro: CRM/Transactions/Setting for Service Request/Define System proposals for related transactions
It is apparently working as, when cliking on the "Find Related Problems", we do have a window appearing with some similar cases.
However, it only shows the Problem (ITPR copied to ZTPR) that have a common categorization but not the other Service request (ZCAS) even if the customizing is the same (see screenshot below) and data are available.
Is that the good understanding of the TREX purpose?
How come the other service request are not shown?
Thank you very much for your help,
Regards,
Anaïs

Hi,
You can configure the system to propose the related transactions based on certain criteria. Configuration is based on the following path:
Customizing for Customer Relationship Management under Transactions Settings for Service Requests Define System Proposals for Related Transactions .
Check your source Transaction (Service Request) and you target transaction (Problem), and flag how would you like to find the related transaction:
By similar:
- category
- Reference Objects
- Organisation Data
-Sold to party
If you also would like to find "Other Service Request", then you customizing should have:
-Source Transaction (Your Service Request),
-Target Transaction (your service Request),
In other words, make a new entry to determine "Other Service Requests" as related transactions, rather than ONLY other Problems as related transactions.
Regards,
Lyda

Links not changed on REMOTE site

I posted a message similar to this one, but for some reason I
can't get to my message and reply.
I created a site and upon finishing the webpages I 'put' the
files to 'remote' site.
Not a single link has changed to the remote URL.
It shows all 'local' links and naturally it don't work. I
have no idea what I missed but doing it several times and even
re-creating everything ... same results. This is such a simple
automatic thing with any cheap editor, but DW it's a MAJOR problem
and so complicated that it takes more time to upload then create
the whole site.
Please send me a message if possible, because I am not able
to see my own message at Adobe for some reason.
thanks :)

DW doesn't change links when it uploads. If the links are
broken locally,
the will be broken when you upload. Conversely, if they are
broken when you
upload, that means that they are broken locally too. To see
that they are
broken locally you will need to look at the code - an
absolute file:/// link
*will* appear to work locally, but it is still broken.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"webkruzer1" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:f4esj0$oq7$[email protected]..
>I posted a message similar to this one, but for some
reason I can't get to
>my
> message and reply.
>
> I created a site and upon finishing the webpages I 'put'
the files to
> 'remote'
> site.
> Not a single link has changed to the remote URL.
> It shows all 'local' links and naturally it don't work.
I have no idea
> what I
> missed but doing it several times and even re-creating
everything ... same
> results. This is such a simple automatic thing with any
cheap editor, but
> DW
> it's a MAJOR problem and so complicated that it takes
more time to upload
> then
> create the whole site.
> Please send me a message if possible, because I am not
able to see my own
> message at Adobe for some reason.
> thanks :)
>

How to Copy Service request Notes to the new Service request

Dear Experts
I have to write code for copying the service request's notes filed value to the new service request when User clicks on copy button.
Fields in the Heard are getting copied when user copies to a new service request. But notes filed are not getting copied.
Please suggest the available options for coding / configuration to achieve this.
Regards
Hanu
Edited by: Hanu Madhava on Dec 14, 2011 12:05 PM

Hi,
The thing is like this....
i have a released request in which we have more than 1200 objects, in that i dont need 10 objects.
so when i create it as copy of transport request, i just deleted those 10 objects and saved.
Now, if i transport the new request how many objects will go? 1200 or 1190?
in the new request i am getting the old request under Comment: Object List Included.
is it necessary to transport the old request?
i need to transport only 1190 objects.
Regards,
Satish Reddy.
Edited by: Sathish Reddy on Jan 28, 2010 2:18 PM

Image not visible on remote site

HI,
I have a set of pages made with templates . There is a
problem however : certain images don't appear on the remote site
and are replaced by red crosses.
I send an example : when clicking on the image , a wider
version should appear but instead there's a little red cross . It
works fine on my preview browser. Do you know how to solve this ?
Thanks .
This is a link to the file, try to cclick on the image :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/brunierbrunojulier/IllustrationsFrame-02monument1.html

You are linking to your template which you have uploaded (?):
<a href="Templates/IllustrationsFrame-02girlWaving.dwt"
class="navigation2">WavingGirl</a></td>
Jo
"bejim" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:e389mc$1p5$[email protected]..
> HI,
> I have a set of pages made with templates . There is a
problem however :
> certain images don't appear on the remote site and are
replaced by red
> crosses.
> I send an example : when clicking on the image , a wider
version should
> appear
> but instead there's a little red cross . It works fine
on my preview
> browser.
> Do you know how to solve this ? Thanks .
> This is a link to the file, try to cclick on the image :
>
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/brunierbrunojulier/IllustrationsFrame-02monument1.html
>
>

SCCM 2012 R2 - Error when marking Service Request as Complete from remote console

If I attempt to Complete a SR from a remote console I receive the following error. Marking as Complete from the console installed on the Management Server works as expected. Has anyone encountered this ?
Date: 22/09/2014 18:37:18
Application: System Center Service Manager
Application Version: 7.5.3079.0
Severity: Error
Message: Method not found: 'Void Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.UI.SdkDataAccess.ConsoleCommand.VerifyDataItemClass(Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.UI.DataModel.IDataItem, System.String, System.Guid, System.String, System.String, System.String)'.
System.MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'Void Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.UI.SdkDataAccess.ConsoleCommand.VerifyDataItemClass(Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.UI.DataModel.IDataItem, System.String, System.Guid, System.String, System.String, System.String)'.
   at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.UI.SdkDataAccess.ConsoleTaskHandler.DoTask(IList`1 navigationNodes, NavigationModelNodeTask task, List`1 parameterList)
   at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.UI.SdkDataAccess.ConsoleTaskHandler.DoTask(IList`1 navigationNodes, NavigationModelNodeTask task)
   at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ConsoleFramework.WindowJobRecord.ExecuteBackgroundJob(Object sender, ConsoleJobEventArgs eventargs)
   at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.ServiceManager.UI.Console.ConsoleJobExceptionHandler.ExecuteJob(IComponent component, EventHandler`1 job, Object sender, ConsoleJobEventArgs args)
Ian Moran

Thanks. Although the Console version was showing the same on both the server and users workstations I think what we had was UR3 installed on the servers and UR2 installed on the workstations. Installing UR3 on all workstations seems to have fixed the issue
(not all have tested)
Ian Moran

Possible Bug - Web Service Request Not Correct

Hi,
I am running ApEx 2.2 and think I may have come across a bug when referencing a web service that has been created using JDeveloper.
I have created my WSDL in JDev that looks like the following:
<definitions
name="MyHelloWorldService"
targetNamespace="http://helloworldserver/"
xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
xmlns:tns="http://helloworldserver/"
xmlns:soap12="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/"
xmlns:mime="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
>
<types>
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="http://helloworldserver/"
elementFormDefault="qualified" xmlns:tns="http://helloworldserver/" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:soap11-enc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
<element name="getCountElement">
<complexType>
<sequence/>
</complexType>
</element>
<element name="getCountResponseElement">
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="result" type="int"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
<element name="sayHelloElement">
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="name" type="string" nillable="true"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
<element name="sayHelloResponseElement">
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="result" type="string" nillable="true"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
</schema>
</types>
<message name="IHelloWorld_getCount">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:getCountElement"/>
</message>
<message name="IHelloWorld_getCountResponse">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:getCountResponseElement"/>
</message>
<message name="IHelloWorld_sayHello">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:sayHelloElement"/>
</message>
<message name="IHelloWorld_sayHelloResponse">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:sayHelloResponseElement"/>
</message>
<portType name="MyHelloWorldService">
<operation name="getCount">
<input message="tns:IHelloWorld_getCount"/>
<output message="tns:IHelloWorld_getCountResponse"/>
</operation>
<operation name="sayHello">
<input message="tns:IHelloWorld_sayHello"/>
<output message="tns:IHelloWorld_sayHelloResponse"/>
</operation>
</portType>
<binding name="MyHelloWorldServiceSoapHttp" type="tns:MyHelloWorldService">
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<operation name="getCount">
<soap:operation soapAction="http://helloworldserver//getCount"/>
<input>
<soap:body use="literal"/>
</input>
<output>
<soap:body use="literal"/>
</output>
</operation>
<operation name="sayHello">
<soap:operation soapAction="http://helloworldserver//sayHello"/>
<input>
<soap:body use="literal"/>
</input>
<output>
<soap:body use="literal"/>
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
<service name="MyHelloWorldService">
<port name="MyHelloWorldServiceSoapHttpPort" binding="tns:MyHelloWorldServiceSoapHttp">
<soap:address location="http://cjbrown-lap:8888/HelloWorld-HelloWorldServer-context-root/MyHelloWorldServiceSoapHttpPort"/>
</port>
</service>
</definitions>
When referencing this in ApEx it can see the methods getCount and sayHello, and it can also see all the input and output parameters. The problem comes when I test the web service.
The request generated by ApEx is the following for the sayHello method:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema">
<SOAP-ENV:Body><namesp1:sayHello xmlns:namesp1="http://helloworldserver/"><namesp1:name xsi:type="xsd:string"></namesp1:name></namesp1:sayHello></SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
This returns the following message from the webservice:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ns0="http://helloworldserver/"><env:Body><env:Fault><faultcode>env:Client</faultcode><faultstring>Caught exception while handling request: unexpected element name: expected={http://helloworldserver/}sayHelloElement, actual={http://helloworldserver/}sayHello</faultstring></env:Fault></env:Body></env:Envelope>
The correct request should in fact be:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema">
<SOAP-ENV:Body><namesp1:sayHelloElement xmlns:namesp1="http://helloworldserver/"><namesp1:name xsi:type="xsd:string">Chris</namesp1:name></namesp1:sayHelloElement></SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
This will return the expected message:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ns0="http://helloworldserver/"><env:Body><ns0:sayHelloResponseElement><ns0:result>Hello Chris</ns0:result></ns0:sayHelloResponseElement></env:Body></env:Envelope>
What ApEx seems to be doing is using the name of the method, rather than what is being detailed in the WSDL as the expected input envelope. It is also not showing the input parameters as an input box in the test instead is shows "Report returned no rows".
I have managed to get around this issue in a less than ideal way be modifying the NAME column in the WWV_FLOW_WS_OPERATIONS table to sayHelloElement instead of sayHello, and the TYPE_IS_XSD column in the WWV_FLOW_WS_PARAMETERS table to Y instead of N, in the FLOWS_020200 schema.
It now works fine, but why what could have caused it to not be correct in the first place? The answer to this is very important to me as I am working on a way to call XML Publisher seemlessly, without using a URL link, from ApEx, and then emailing the output document to the user. I don't want to have to modify the underlying tables each time I add a new web service reference in ApEx.
Any comments, views, assistance is welcome here.
Many Thank in Advance
Cj

Tony:
Thanks for reporting the issue. There was a change in the session pop-up page to include reporting on the new xmltype column in collections. Unfortunately the wrong function is being called on the xmltype column to display its contents. This will be fixed in an upcoming release.
Application Express 4.0 Web service support makes use of this new xmltype column in a collection. Therefore if you call a web service that returns a large XML document, and you click the session toolbar, you will receive the error.
Regards,
Jason

Self-service request not finding suitable fitting

Hi,
When I have a user request an assembly from the library via the self service portal, I get the following error:
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null
Anyone an idea of what I am doing wrong? :-(
here the full log:
Placement is not feasible with reason:Placement's feasibility is false
The available Supply is [
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
Children=>[
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_server_pool Target Name:MyGarageServer
Numerosities=>[
{Cpu=>0.98/1.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false},
{Memory=>22423.0/32686.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{DiskStorage=>22010.0/22010.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{Nic=>0.0/8.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false},
{Server=>2.0/2.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false}]
Overall Resource Starvation caused no placement to be feasible
Cannot find suitable placements to satisfy all affinity and antiaffinity requirements
Placement computation logs :
==== Starting to Compute for Placement
---> Available Supplies are
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
Children=>[
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_server_pool Target Name:MyGarageServer
Numerosities=>[
{Cpu=>0.98/1.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false},
{Memory=>22423.0/32686.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{DiskStorage=>22010.0/22010.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{Nic=>0.0/8.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false},
{Server=>2.0/2.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false}]
---> Demands to be placed are
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.assembly.impl.elements.VirtualSystemImpl@3b3c0fb, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[{"Class"=oracle.sysman.vt.service.placement.impl.RequestInterpreter$SingleComparibleValueCharacteristic,"Name"=SUPPORT_DESTINATION,"canBeInherited"=false,"shouldBeOverwrite"=true [1]}]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[]
Children=>[
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>4096.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
---> Demands that are placeable are
oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3
#### Starting to match demand the supply based on Characteristics and Associations
#### Start Working on a demand to be placed:
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3, Placeable=>true
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>4096.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
#### Found the Following Supply that can fit the demand based on characteristics and associations
Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone
#### Sort the eligible supplies based on scoring
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
#### End computing fitting placement based on characteristics and associations
#### Start to organize the demand with list of eligible supplies
#### Shuffle the demand nodes for non-ordered fitting
#### The order of the Demand nodes are
oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3
#### Starting to Compute placement based on Resource Fitting and Affinity relationships
#### Working on demand:
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3, Placeable=>true
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>4096.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
#### This supply does not have sufficient resource:
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
#### Cloud not Find any Placement for: oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3 in current iteration.
#### The algorithm has traversed through all possible paths, and could not find a feasible match that would satisfy all demands
==== Placement Computation Did not Find Suitable Fitting
Output Log
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null

how to solution this problem????
thanks !!!!!!
输出日志
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null
错误日志
Placement is not feasible with reason:Placement's feasibility is false
The available Supply is [
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
Children=>[
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_server_pool Target Name:Mypools
Numerosities=>[
{Cpu=>0.99/1.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false},
{Memory=>5488.0/6131.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{DiskStorage=>7006.0/7006.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{Nic=>0.0/4.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false},
{Server=>1.0/1.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false}]
Overall Resource Starvation caused no placement to be feasible
Cannot find suitable placements to satisfy all affinity and antiaffinity requirements
Placement computation logs :
==== Starting to Compute for Placement
---> Available Supplies are
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
Children=>[
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_server_pool Target Name:Mypools
Numerosities=>[
{Cpu=>0.99/1.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false},
{Memory=>5488.0/6131.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{DiskStorage=>7006.0/7006.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{Nic=>0.0/4.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false},
{Server=>1.0/1.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false}]
---> Demands to be placed are
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.assembly.impl.elements.VirtualSystemImpl@6833d129, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[{"Class"=oracle.sysman.vt.service.placement.impl.RequestInterpreter$SingleComparibleValueCharacteristic,"Name"=SUPPORT_DESTINATION,"canBeInherited"=false,"shouldBeOverwrite"=true [1]}]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[]
Children=>[
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>1024.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
---> Demands that are placeable are
oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031
#### Starting to match demand the supply based on Characteristics and Associations
#### Start Working on a demand to be placed:
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031, Placeable=>true
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>1024.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
#### Found the Following Supply that can fit the demand based on characteristics and associations
Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1
#### Sort the eligible supplies based on scoring
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
#### End computing fitting placement based on characteristics and associations
#### Start to organize the demand with list of eligible supplies
#### Shuffle the demand nodes for non-ordered fitting
#### The order of the Demand nodes are
oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031
#### Starting to Compute placement based on Resource Fitting and Affinity relationships
#### Working on demand:
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031, Placeable=>true
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>1024.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
#### This supply does not have sufficient resource:
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
#### Cloud not Find any Placement for: oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031 in current iteration.
#### The algorithm has traversed through all possible paths, and could not find a feasible match that would satisfy all demands
==== Placement Computation Did not Find Suitable Fitting

Permissions Web Service Requests

Okay, I'm moving from "Groups" to "Permissions".
This post is just an FYI…not sure it's a bug or a feature…or even a little bit of both at the same time.
In the "Permissions" web service requests (AddPermission, etc.) if you do not specify either a ParentHandle or ParentPath, the web service request is applied to your site root. You can still use a single forward slash as ParentPath for "root"…it has the same effect as leaving ParentPath and ParentHandle empty.
If I recall correctly, most requests that take either a handle or path will return an error if neither is specified. I think this may be one of a small subset of requests that assumes "root" if both are missing.

More notes on permissions…again, I think things work as intended, but I thought I'd mention this tidbit in the event that it might be useful to others.
MergePermission can only work with an existing permission (access-level/credential pair)…this is as expected. If you try to "merge" a permission for a credential which does not exist, or if you do not specify a credential, you get an error saying that MergePermission cannot find the target credential. In effect, MergePermission changes the access-level for any permission it can find by-way-of an existing credential.
Similarly, you cannot ask MergePermission to change the form of a credential. For example, you cannot use MergePermission to "change the credential whose associated access-level is 'Download' from 'Test@urn:mace…' to 'Student@urn:mace…'." MergePermission must always find that a target credential exists.
However, when dealing with an existing permission, there is no effective difference between AddPermission and MergePermission. That is, if you add a permission whose credential already exits, then you overwrite it as-if you had merged it. Again, this works as expected. A "student", say, cannot have both "Downlaod" and "No Access" within the same iTunes U page. The only warning I would give is that AddPermission can act destructively…you are not warned, when using it, that if the permission you wish to add corresponds to a permission which already exists, then that permission will be overwritten.

GWTDOMAIN Service request not forwarded to remote site gwerrno(402019)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for