Self-service request not finding suitable fitting

Hi,
When I have a user request an assembly from the library via the self service portal, I get the following error:
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null
Anyone an idea of what I am doing wrong? :-(
here the full log:
Placement is not feasible with reason:Placement's feasibility is false
The available Supply is [
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
Children=>[
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_server_pool Target Name:MyGarageServer
Numerosities=>[
{Cpu=>0.98/1.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false},
{Memory=>22423.0/32686.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{DiskStorage=>22010.0/22010.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{Nic=>0.0/8.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false},
{Server=>2.0/2.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false}]
Overall Resource Starvation caused no placement to be feasible
Cannot find suitable placements to satisfy all affinity and antiaffinity requirements
Placement computation logs :
==== Starting to Compute for Placement
---> Available Supplies are
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
Children=>[
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_server_pool Target Name:MyGarageServer
Numerosities=>[
{Cpu=>0.98/1.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false},
{Memory=>22423.0/32686.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{DiskStorage=>22010.0/22010.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{Nic=>0.0/8.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false},
{Server=>2.0/2.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false}]
---> Demands to be placed are
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.assembly.impl.elements.VirtualSystemImpl@3b3c0fb, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[{"Class"=oracle.sysman.vt.service.placement.impl.RequestInterpreter$SingleComparibleValueCharacteristic,"Name"=SUPPORT_DESTINATION,"canBeInherited"=false,"shouldBeOverwrite"=true     [1]}]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[]
Children=>[
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>4096.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
---> Demands that are placeable are
oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3
#### Starting to match demand the supply based on Characteristics and Associations
#### Start Working on a demand to be placed:
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3, Placeable=>true
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>4096.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
#### Found the Following Supply that can fit the demand based on characteristics and associations
Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone
#### Sort the eligible supplies based on scoring
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
#### End computing fitting placement based on characteristics and associations
#### Start to organize the demand with list of eligible supplies
#### Shuffle the demand nodes for non-ordered fitting
#### The order of the Demand nodes are
oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3
#### Starting to Compute placement based on Resource Fitting and Affinity relationships
#### Working on demand:
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3, Placeable=>true
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>4096.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
#### This supply does not have sufficient resource:
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:SelfServiceZone, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
#### Cloud not Find any Placement for: oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@e42a0a3 in current iteration.
#### The algorithm has traversed through all possible paths, and could not find a feasible match that would satisfy all demands
==== Placement Computation Did not Find Suitable Fitting
Output Log
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null

how to solution this problem????
thanks !!!!!!
输出日志
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null
Error while checkig placement feasibility: null
错误日志
Placement is not feasible with reason:Placement's feasibility is false
The available Supply is [
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
Children=>[
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_server_pool Target Name:Mypools
Numerosities=>[
{Cpu=>0.99/1.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false},
{Memory=>5488.0/6131.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{DiskStorage=>7006.0/7006.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{Nic=>0.0/4.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false},
{Server=>1.0/1.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false}]
Overall Resource Starvation caused no placement to be feasible
Cannot find suitable placements to satisfy all affinity and antiaffinity requirements
Placement computation logs :
==== Starting to Compute for Placement
---> Available Supplies are
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
Children=>[
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_server_pool Target Name:Mypools
Numerosities=>[
{Cpu=>0.99/1.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false},
{Memory=>5488.0/6131.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{DiskStorage=>7006.0/7006.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>true},
{Nic=>0.0/4.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false},
{Server=>1.0/1.0 Flex=>false Discrete=>false}]
---> Demands to be placed are
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.assembly.impl.elements.VirtualSystemImpl@6833d129, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[{"Class"=oracle.sysman.vt.service.placement.impl.RequestInterpreter$SingleComparibleValueCharacteristic,"Name"=SUPPORT_DESTINATION,"canBeInherited"=false,"shouldBeOverwrite"=true     [1]}]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[]
Children=>[
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>1024.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
---> Demands that are placeable are
oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031
#### Starting to match demand the supply based on Characteristics and Associations
#### Start Working on a demand to be placed:
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031, Placeable=>true
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>1024.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
#### Found the Following Supply that can fit the demand based on characteristics and associations
Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1
#### Sort the eligible supplies based on scoring
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
#### End computing fitting placement based on characteristics and associations
#### Start to organize the demand with list of eligible supplies
#### Shuffle the demand nodes for non-ordered fitting
#### The order of the Demand nodes are
oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031
#### Starting to Compute placement based on Resource Fitting and Affinity relationships
#### Working on demand:
Referenced=>oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031, Placeable=>true
Associations=>[]
Characteristics=>[]
IsUniform=>false
Numerosities=>[
{Memory=>1024.0/0.0 Flex=>true Discrete=>false}]
#### This supply does not have sufficient resource:
Referenced=>Target Type: oracle_vm_zone Target Name:cloud_zone_1, Placeable=>false
Associations=>[]
Numerosities=>[]
Score=>0.0
#### Cloud not Find any Placement for: oracle.sysman.vt.service.provisioning.deployment.assembly.impl.VirtualSystemConfigImpl@21e91031 in current iteration.
#### The algorithm has traversed through all possible paths, and could not find a feasible match that would satisfy all demands
==== Placement Computation Did not Find Suitable Fitting

Similar Messages

  • When creating self service request contains attachments and it's approved

    when creating self service request contains attachments and it's approved  is the attachments automatic transfer to the applet form or not?

    resolved

  • Custom Self-Service Request

    Hi All,
    I have created a custom Self-Service Request i.e. "CASH ADVANCE" using EIT.Done all the setup in
    HR & AME(Approvals upto 2 positions up.What i have done the setup:
    1) Created an EIT for CASH ADVANCE
    2) Created a function for CASH ADVANCE
    3) Added the Function to the Self-Service Menu
    4) Run "Register Extra Information Types" for "CASH ADVANCE"
    5) Ceated a Condition in AME using existing Attibute
    6) Created a Rule also in AME
    7) Enabled profile options for Personalization
    8) Profile options for BG, Security Profile & Usertype are set
    Yet to be done:
    1) Need to enable DFF segments in Self-service page using Personalization for CASH ADVANCE segments
    After enabling profile options for Personalization, when i selected the Request..
    It is showing Error as shown below:
    Error:
    The selected action is not available. The cause may be related to security.
    Contact your system administrator to verify your permission level for this action.
    Pl guide me where i have to check? I appreciate inputs from anyone.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Siva

    hi Siva,
    Please add the Function you have created for 'CASH ADVANCE' to following menus also:
    1. Personal Actions Menu
    2. Manager Actions Menu
    3. Global Self Service Functions Custom
    The prompt in 1 and 2 should be same as you have given in the Menu through which you are accessing this function.
    Regards,
    Manuj

  • Self service request to Activity in EIC

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement in e-recruitment that changing navigation from Inbox to Activity.
    In standard solution of Employee Interaction center creating an activity involves in the following steps.
    1.     Select the self service request and click on process button
    2.     Leads to the employee search screen, click on same as contact
    3.     Click on Create activity button to create activity
    4.     Fill in the details and save the activity.
    In the current scenario steps 2, 3, are avoided and an activity has to be created automatically from step 1 to step 4.
    How can I do it. Can any one describe the procedure & methodology?
    Please help me on this?
    Regards
    Venkat.

    Hi Friends,
    Can you any one please reply on this question?
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks
    Venkat.

  • GWTDOMAIN Service request not forwarded to remote site gwerrno(402019)

    Hi
    my tuxedo sometime take errors as followed:
    084405.guzqz2!GWTDOMAIN.11056: LIBGW_CAT:1029: ERROR: Service request not forwarded to remote site:"TPESVCERR - server error while handling request" gwerrno*(402019)*
    084521.guzqz2!GWTDOMAIN.11056: LIBGW_CAT:1029: ERROR: Service request not forwarded to remote site:"TPESVCERR - server error while handling request" gwerrno(402019)
    OS: SCO Open Server506
    tuxedo version: 6.5
    patchlev: 455
    it will come OK each time 10-20 minutes after it take such errors.
    I checked the pq and IPCs . there seems to be no blocked process or queqes .
    have anybody solved problem like this?
    Please help. Thanks a lot
    =======================================
    pq
    Prog Name Queue Name # Serve WkQueued # Queued Ave. Len Machine
    C00000 00001.00015 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    BBL 140000 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    DMADM 00001.00010 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    WSL 00001.00005 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    GWTDOMAIN gwgrp 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    C00000 00001.00011 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    B31296 00003.00060 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    GWADM 00001.00020 1 0 0 0.0 SITE1
    ================================
    IPCS
    ipcs -a
    IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Sep 25 09:03:30 2008
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP CBYTES QNUM QBYTES LSPID LRPID STIME RTIME CTIME
    Message Queues:
    q 16141 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 27406 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 21263 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 22288 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 4881 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11055 11054 23:11:32 23:11:32 23:11:32
    q 8466 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11054 11055 23:11:32 23:11:32 23:11:32
    q 22291 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11065 11056 9:01:36 9:01:36 23:11:32
    q 13588 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11056 11059 9:01:33 9:01:33 23:11:32
    q 277 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 24854 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11062 10:53:01 10:53:01 23:11:32
    q 18711 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 24856 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 29465 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 11546 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:32
    q 29467 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11063 9:01:26 9:01:26 23:11:33
    q 15132 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
    q 15133 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11057 11064 16:04:23 16:04:23 23:11:33
    q 6942 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11065 9:01:33 9:01:33 23:11:33
    q 29471 0x00000000 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
    q 11040 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
    q 29473 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:33
    q 15138 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 11059 11068 11:09:39 11:09:39 23:11:33
    q 15651 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:34
    q 7460 0x00000000 -Rrw-rw---- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 0 0 32768 0 0 no-entry no-entry 23:11:34
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NATTCH SEGSZ CPID LPID ATIME DTIME CTIME
    Shared Memory:
    m 0 0x000018e5 --rw-rw-rw-     root      sys     root      sys      2  23228   547   549 11:44:34 no-entry 11:44:34
    m 12307 0x0002c309 rw-rw-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 23 791012 11049 11150 8:59:50 8:59:56 23:11:30
    m 12308 0x00000000 rw----- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 4 1568 11050 11053 23:11:32 no-entry 23:11:32
    m 12309 0x00000000 rw----- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 2 69967 11055 11056 23:11:32 no-entry 23:11:32
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NSEMS OTIME CTIME
    Semaphores:
    s 26009 0x0002c309 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 3 9:03:21 23:11:30
    s 26010 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
    s 26011 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
    s 13012 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
    s 26013 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 243 no-entry 23:11:30
    s 26014 0x00000000 ra-ra-- rmtsrv informix rmtsrv informix 28 7:55:00 23:11:32
    Edited by: user7335851 on 2008-9-25 上午2:19

    There's a similar case to that in which the solution was to upgrade the patchlev of Tuxedo software. The latest RP for Tuxedo 6.5 resolve some issues related to GWTDOMAIN process.
    501. CR266129 Tuxedo 6.5 RP496: LIBGW_CAT:1029 Service request not forwarded - TPELIMIT (S-34477)
    517. CR342496 Tx 6.5 [propagation] pq in tmadmin report too large number for GWTDOMAIN, not match ipcs results (S-42376)
    Many things related to domains have been fixed.
    I hope that solves your problem.
    Regards.

  • Issue when installing SQL Server Express 2012 - "The requested control is not valid for this service" + "Could not find the database engine startup handle"

    Good morning,
    I'm experiencing the following issue when installing Microsoft SQL Server Express 2012 (with tools, SQLEXPRWT_x86_ENU.exe) on the laptop of my company;
    Installation goes plain until around the end of the progress bar, it stops on the setup of
    SqlEngineDBStartConfigAction_install_configrc_Cpu32
    giving 7-8 times, even pressing "Cancel", the message "The requested control is not valid for this service";
    After this, I receive one last message ""Could not find the database engine startup handle", then installation ends with failures, in particular the Database Engine and the Server Replication failed to be installed.
    I've put in my SkyDrive the error log I received after the install;
    I'm at full disposal if you need further information,
    thank you in advance
    Best regards
    Francesco

    Well, i just ran into this issue and the problem was lack of admin rights. It was my company's laptop so got the setup initiated by my company's IT team with admin rights. However, the upon completion of setup, i go the same error messages as stated above: 
    SqlEngineDBStartConfigAction_install_configrc_Cpu32
    giving 7-8 times, even pressing "Cancel", the message "The requested control is not valid for this service";
    After this, I receive one last message ""Could not find the database engine startup handle", then installation ends with failures, in particular the Database Engine and the Server Replication failed to be installed.
    Also, if you open SQL Server Configuration, the status of the service is "Change Pending" and you would not be able to set the startup login type to Local Service/System/Network.
    Then, I just got my account added as Local Admin and then tried to start the service and was able to.
    However, I am not sure whether same was the case for you.
    Please mark the answer as helpful if i have answered your query. Thanks and Regards, Kartar Rana

  • Service Requests not displaying on Service Request HomePage

    Hi
    i have been performing operations like inserting new Service Request, Getting list of Service Requests and Updating Service Requests via web service integration.
    Everything was working fine till 2 days ago. Suddenly today my Service Request HomePage does not show any of my earlier service request records??? However, when i filter for them using the SR Number i am able to view them.
    Also i get the list of service requests and i am also able to insert requests but the new records do not show in the homepage. Worst of alll, i am unable to update any of my earlier records bcoz the crm is not able to find the matching SRNumber!
    This is very confusing. Can someone please tell me how i can fix this problem?
    Thanks,
    Saket

    did you try to restart the Microsoft Monitoring Agent?
    Antoine AL Ibry

  • Self service pages not opening

    Dear All
    We are upgrading form 11.0.3 to R12, and they have build lots customized workflow and self service pages. The menus and functions are there, but still it is not opening and it says page cant be opened.
    But employee self service responsibilty is opening fine. Do we need to do any setups or we have anything to move like we move the custom form and reports.
    Kindly help me in this
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Nakshathra

    So no Self Service page is opening? If that is the case, then I guess some configuration issue with URL or something similar.
    Is Apache log completely empty or it has the page request calls logged?
    --Shiv                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • CUP-Password Self Service-Email not received by user

    Hi,
    I confidured SMTP server with Mail server information.
    I raised a request for Password Self-service for a User.
    Request executed successfuly with a message " Password was reset and send to email id of user"
    Password in backend system has reset successfully,
    but No Email has received by user regarding reset PW.
    What si the problem, why the user not received email? even in CUP it shows that email sent successfully.

    Hi,
    Yes i scheduled email dispatcher.
    Now Email is received by the user.
    User received a link for password, when user click on that a blank page with header Password is displayed.
    no other information is appearing.
    Thanks
    Ram.

  • TREX - CRM Service request not showing

    Hi everyone,
    Per our understanding, TREX is linked with the button "Find related problems" on the 'More' button available on the Header tab.
    We are using service request (SRV copied to ZCAS) to create incident. Our purpose is to be able to display the other service request (ZCAS) that would have some similarities (categorization, BP,...).
    To do that, we have customized the following transaction in the spro:  CRM/Transactions/Setting for Service Request/Define System proposals for related transactions
    It is apparently working as, when cliking on the "Find Related Problems", we do have a window appearing with some similar cases.
    However, it only shows the Problem (ITPR copied to ZTPR) that have a common categorization but not the other Service request (ZCAS) even if the customizing is the same (see screenshot below) and data are available.
    Is that the good understanding of the TREX purpose?
    How come the other service request are not shown?
    Thank you very much for your help,
    Regards,
    Anaïs

    Hi,
    You can configure the system to propose the related transactions based on certain criteria. Configuration is based on the following path:
    Customizing for Customer Relationship Management under Transactions Settings for Service Requests Define System Proposals for Related Transactions .
    Check your source Transaction (Service Request) and you target transaction (Problem), and flag how would you like to find the related transaction:
    By similar:
    - category
    - Reference Objects
    - Organisation Data
    -Sold to party
    If you also would like to find "Other Service Request", then you customizing should have:
    -Source Transaction (Your Service Request),
    -Target Transaction (your service Request),
    In other words, make a new entry to determine "Other Service Requests" as related transactions, rather than ONLY other Problems as related transactions.
    Regards,
    Lyda

  • Self Service request is going to error after final Approver.

    Hi,
    Here we configured leave system through EIT and we are using self service (EIT) to make leave request. We have 3 level of approver for Annual Leave. Problem here is after final approver (3rd approver) approves the leave then request is going in to error. I traced the item key through Workflow Administrator > Status Monitor.
    The error is Details are given below (Status Monitor)
    Failed Activity     
    Notify HR About Commit Application Error
    Activity Type     
    Notice
    Error Name     
    WFNTF_ROLE
    Error Message     
    3205: '[email protected]' is not a valid role or user name.
    Error Stack     
    Wf_Notification.Send([email protected], HRSSA, HR_EMBED_DEPT_COMMAPPLERR_MSG, WF_ENGINE.CB) Wf_Engine_Util.Notification_Send(HRSSA, 1649471, 195663, HRSSA:HR_EMBED_DEPT_COMMAPPLERR_MSG) Wf_Engine_Util.Notification(HRSSA, 1649471, 195663, RUN)
    I appreciate if someone can help me.
    Regards,
    Jojo George

    Okay, if the $PROFILES$ reference has been working for a long time that doesn't sound like a problem. I would then suggest this is an unusual data scenario where the value the user selected was temporarily available. Don't ask me how - it's your data! The user that submitted it might be able to shed some light. For example, this kind of thing might do it:
    1) Manager logs on to ESS, starts an SIT transaction (the one in question) and Saves for Later. This sets $PROFILES$.PER_PERSON_ID to themself.
    2) Manager then switches to MSS and views one of their employees - this sets $PROFILES$.PER_PERSON_ID to their employee, not themselves.
    3) Manager then navigates to Homepage and continues the Saved for Later transaction from the Worklist (ie, without clicking on the ESS responsibility). Perhaps $PROFILES$.PER_PERSON_ID is still set to their direct report rather than themselves?
    4) Manager then selects one of their employees contracts rather than their own (because of $PROFILES$.PER_PERSON_ID being wrong).
    5) Manager submits the transaction.
    I don't know if that's possible or even if that's how it behaves. But it sounds plausible and is an example of perhaps the weird set of circumstances that might have happened here. Regardless, I'd still maintain that this value was available to the user in the Value Set at the time they submitted it.
    If it's just a one-off data problem and this has been working fine for a while I wouldn't worry about it. Bin the workflow, get the employee to re-submit. Job done.

  • Service Requests not resolving

    Good Morning TechNet Experts,
    I have been having an issue with service requests and I'm one week away from deployment. Basically, I had no need for a "Review" activity, we implement service requests the same way we implement incidents. An analyst opens a ticket for customer,
    once service has been applied they should resolve the service request. With incidents this is easy, you just change the incident status to resolved...
    However, with Service Requests I created a new template that did not require the "Approval" activity, only the "Apply Service" activity. My Idea was when an analyst is finished with the ticket, he/she just marks the "Apply Service"
    activity as completed and the service request can move to "Completed" status.
    Although the activity is being marked as completed, the ticket is not changing status. Some are stuck in "In Progress" and some are stuck in "New" status (even though the activity is showing as completed....). These have been stuck for
    more than 24 hours now... when this actually goes into production a week from now even 5 minutes is a long time.
    What can I do to solve this? I am open to implementing a new procedure if required. Thanks in advance!

    Hi,
    First of all, it looks like you are having an issue with your workflows. Please restart the HealthService (Microsoft Monitoring Agent) and check if the workflows restart. Do other workflows run (e.g. notification subscriptions)?
    Secondly, if you are using service requests with only one manual activity, I believe the handling is a little bit complicated for your analysts. Why don't you remove all activities completely from your SR template? The service request will then go to status
    "Submitted" once created, and the analyst can use the task "Complete" to complete the SR without having to worry about activities.
    HTH,
    Dieter

  • Inbox Search - status for service request not updated

    Hi,
    In inbox search, the status change for a service request does not reflect until the user log offs or opens the service request in edit mode. PFB the steps followed. (Two users are monitoring the service request but is being processed only by one)
    Web UI window 1(User 1): I open the inbox search result page. Service requests are displayed with the status field
    Web UI window 2(User 2): In a separate window, the service request is approved by changing the status of the service request to Approved.
    Web UI window 1(User 1): In the inbox result screen, i click on search for the same search criteria, but still the old status of the service request(updated in window 2) is displayed.
    Observation:
    1. If I open the service request, the service request still has the old status. If i click on edit, the new status is displayed. If i click on Back button (without clicking on edit), the new status is refelected for the service request in the inbox result page now.
    2. If I log off and again open the inbox result, the new status of the service request is reflected.
    3. The status of the service request is updated in the database immediately user 2 changes the status.
    There is no enhancement done for the inbox search. The behavior is for standard inbox result.
    Please provide any pointers to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Radhika
    Edited by: Radhika Chuttani on Jan 5, 2011 7:13 AM

    Radhika,
    This is standard behavior in the SAP inbox. The reason is that SAP buffers search results in the Inbox in order to improve performance. So even though you hit "search" again, SAP does not update the search results because this search has already been executed in this session. Clicking "End" or logging off refreshes the buffer.
    SAP released a note to update the "Responsible Employee" in the Inbox without requiring the user to log off. You can see their explanation and the solution here:
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1465966
    If you want to enable inbox refresh every time a search is executed, you will probably have to do custom coding. My guess is that you may be able to leverage the CRM_IC_INBOX_BADI. Let me know if this much info is enough or if you want further details on how to technically achieve this.
    Rahul

  • How to Copy Service request Notes to the new Service request

    Dear Experts
    I have to write code for copying the service request's notes filed value to the new service request when User clicks on copy button.
    Fields in the Heard are getting copied when user copies to a new service request. But notes filed are not getting copied.
    Please suggest the available options for coding / configuration to achieve this.
    Regards
    Hanu
    Edited by: Hanu Madhava on Dec 14, 2011 12:05 PM

    Hi,
    The thing is like this....
    i have a released request in which we have more than 1200 objects, in that i dont need 10 objects.
    so when i create it as copy of transport request, i just deleted those 10 objects and saved.
    Now, if i transport the new request how many objects will go? 1200 or 1190?
    in the new request i am getting the old request under Comment: Object List Included.
    is it necessary to transport the old request?
    i need to transport only 1190 objects.
    Regards,
    Satish Reddy.
    Edited by: Sathish Reddy on Jan 28, 2010 2:18 PM

  • Self Service Requests for OIM Access Policies

    In the absence of a Role Management product, is there a good way to enable OIM End User Self Service to process requests and approvals for OIM Access Policies or OIM Groups?
    Any suggestions are appreciated!
    KC

    Ultimately the group membership will trigger an access policy. The access policy assignment is the goal, the group assignment is the typical method to assign the access policy to the user.
    When creating a dummy resource, I assume that resource would have a lookup on the form to select the group name. Is this what you are suggesting?
    KC

Maybe you are looking for