Help required regd ERS Invoice verification.

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement where i have to change Invoice verification date to GR posting date. Usually after GR when we look invoice verification, the posting date will be the current date, but according to requirement i need it to change it to GR posting date.
I need to see the date changes when i run the TCODE MRRL.
Please Advice.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
one possible solution is to activate badi INVOICE_UPDATE and try to change the value there,
if not by parameters then by field symbols.
Best regards.

Similar Messages

GR/Delivery Date required in the Invoice Verification screenlayout

Dear Forum,
We notice that when the users perform the Invoice Verification thru MIRO, in the screenlayout corresponding to 'All Information' the system populates the date under the 'Delivery Date' column, however, this date corresponds to the Delivery Date mentioned in the PO Header and does not reflect the actual GR Date. The users want this to be replaced by the actual Delivery Date when the goods were received and GR was posted. Is there a way to replace this or else modify the layout so that the actual Delivery Date is populated. The reason is that the users want the baseline date to be replaced by the actual GR date and do want to go for another step involving the scrutinizing of the PO History.
Thanks for the help!
Regards

Hi Venkat,
Thanks for the help, is there a way to change the layout of the MIRO screen such that we can view the actual GR or the Delivery Date while doing MIRO.
Regards

Help Required regding: Validation on Data Loading from Flat File

Hi Experts,
I need u r help in the following issue.
I need to validated the transactional data loading to the GL Cube from Flat file,
1) The transactional data to the Cube to be loaded only if master data record exists for the 0GL_ACCOUNT info object.
2) If the master data record does not exits then the record need to be skipped from the loading and after the loading the system should throw a message saying that these many records have been skipped (if there are any skipped records.).
I would really appriciate u r help and suggestions on solving this issue.
Regds
Hari

Hi, write a start routine in transfer rules like this.
DATA: l_s_datapak_line type TRANSFER_STRUCTURE,
 l_s_errorlog TYPE rssm_s_errorlog_int,
 l_s_glaccount type /BI0/PGLACCOUNT,
 new_datapak type tab_transtru.
 refresh new_datapak.
 loop at datapak into l_s_datapak_line.
 select single * from /BI0/PGLACCOUNT into l_s_glaccount
 where CHRT_ACCTS eq l_s_datapak_line-field name in transfer structure/datsource for CHRT_ACCTS
and GL_ACCOUNT eq l_s_datapak_line-field name in transfer structure/datsource for GL_ACCOUNT
and OBJVERS eq 'A'.
 if sy-subrc eq 0.
 append l_s_datapak_line to new_datapak.
 endif.
 endloop.
 datapak = new_datapak.
 if datapak[] is initial.
abort <> 0 means skip whole data package !!!
 ABORT = 4.
 else.
 ABORT = 0.
 endif.
i have already some modifications but U can slightly change it to suit your need.
regards
Emil

Seeburger help required for Supplier Invoice (EDI 810) and Dispatch Advice

Hi All,
Pls let me blog/steps for scenario for Supplier Invoice and Dispatch Advice using Seeburger.
For Supplier Invoice I assume R/3 will send data to Vendor (810).
1. Pls let me know for R/3 to XI will we use INVOCE IDOC?
2. Pls let me know for R/3 to XI Communication do we will use same Distributiion Model setup?
3. Pls let me know what Seeburger BIC modules I need to use in Seeburger AS2/File Receiver Adapter
4. Which Interface and Adapter I need to use for 810 and which Interface and Adapter I need to use for 997.
 Pls send its setup with its Mappings defined in Modules.
5. What is Disptach Advice? Is it also same like Supplier Invoice ? Does it also have EDI Number and if yes then what?
Pls send me blogs for the above Supplier Invoice and Dispatch Advice settings.
Regards

>
Rickkk wrote:
> Hi Ravi and All
>
> I am thankful to all of you for great help of yours.
>
> Steps:
>
> 1) I wil create an INvoice in your backend system. It will generate an IDOC.
> 2) This IDOC will be sent to my XI system.
> 3) I will map the IDOC to the Target XML 810 --- From where I will get this Target XML 810 ?
YOu have to login to the Physical box in which XI is installed (Take Basis Help.
In one of the drives, you will find a folder called seeburger.
Inside that folder, you can browse to find the XSD structure for your 810 .
YOu will find different XSDs for different versions of 810.
Suppose your EDI 810 version is 4010, then you have to use the XSD for 810 4010 version (There will be separate folders for each transaction set/version combination.
It will be there also in the software CD that seeburger provides when you buy it.
> 4) I need a seeburger receiver AS2 adapter that consist of modules that will convert the XML 810 docuemnt to EDI document.
>
> Below are the modules will be present in you suggested seeburger receiver AS2 adapter
> module key Parameter name Parameter value
> bic destSourceMsg MainDocument
> bic destTargetMsg MainDocument
> bic mappingName <the name of your X2E mapping for 810>
> exit JNDIName deployedAdapters/SeeXIAS2/shareable/SeeXIAS2
>
Yes.
> 5. As per blog -
/people/rajeshkumar.pasupula/blog/2009/08/05/wanna-implement-seeburger-for-edi-find-the-booster
>
> For 997 Interface we are using seeburger Sender adapter and for 850 Interface we are using Split997 Sender adapter -- Reverse order
>
> For this scenario will it be like this again like
> For 997 Interface we will use Seeburger Receiver AS2 Adapter where the above modules are configured -- Pls suggest
>
> For 810 Interface we will use Split997 Receiver adapter -- No modules configured Pls suggest
>
> I request you to kindly send me snapshots or blogs which has snapsot for this scenario.
>
No need of split 997 in outbound case. In this case, you will send the 810 and the partner will send the 997.
So, to receive that 997 file, you need another scenario. You need the split 997 communication channel only in inbound case like in 850, but not in outbound case.
> Last point -- is Dispatch advice direction is like 850 (Inbound ) or its direction is like 810 (outbound)?
> Do we have IDOC or something like that present and its mapping ?
>
like I said earlier, it is an outbound document if your company is the vendor.
It will be inbound if your company is the Customer to some other company.
The IDOC that is used usually will be DESADV idoc.
> Regards

Invoice verification (MM-IV) for bulk materials

Hi fellow SAP Experts,
We have a specific requirement for the invoice verification around bulk materials. When ordering bulk material, we almost always receive a larger quantity than ordered. So the quantity on the GR is larger than the quantity on the PO, and this difference can be as high as 10%. If in these cases we receive an invoice with the same quantity as on the GR, and the same unit price as on the PO, we don't want to have an invoice block for quantity (caused by the 3-way match).
You could reason to set up an upper limit of 10% for the quantity block DQ in transaction OMR6, but then this limit will be for all invoices. This is undesired, as we want to have tighter limits (e.g. 5%) for other types of products than bulk materials.
Has any of you guys faced a similar requirement in the past, and how did you approach the solution for it?
I have already read a lot of documentation on the invoice verification in SAP, but I can't find the solution to my problem in it. So any pointers in the right direction are highly appreciated!
Best regards, Paul van Rouwendaal

As far as I understand it now, the DQ block does exactly what you say Mitch: only block if the GR quantity is different than the invoice quantity (without taking the ordered quantity in account). Especially if you use the 'GR Bsd IV'flag on the PO.
When you don't want to receive more than you have ordered, you can set delivery tollerances in MM on posting the GR, but that is a completely different story. This is actually what we are thinking of using for the cases with bulk material.
Maybe we still need to extend the check (in enhancement MM08R002), but for now I think it will not be necessary.
Thank you all for your helpful replies!

GR invoice verification field should not be mandatory in PO

Dear Experts,
When we are creating Service PO, at that time we require the GR invoice verification field (Under Invoice Tab) should not be mandatory but other POu2019s it should be mandatory.
Please suggest solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards,
Shatrughan

Guys!
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought external service purchasing with GR (service entry acceptance) but without GR-based IV was impossible. This is a standard SAP check that can't be overridden in any BAdI. So either you give up SES and enter the invoices without any reference or make the invoices refer to the SES!
I see that there's some option to allow ESM orders without the GR flag, but then at least the service-based IV flag shall be set. The option is in IMG for MM -> External Services Management -> Source Determination and Default Values -> for Client. Look at the bottom of the screen for the flag "Service item: IR before GR allowed". Unfortunately this flag is not visible in my 6.0 system, but in a EhP4 system it is.
But still - some kind of reference in the IR you will need anyway - SES in this case. Or give-up entering SES at all (remove the flag "GR" in the PO).
BR
Raf

Automatic Posting of Purch Condition (Not Require Invoice Verification)

For each line on the purchase order we have a number of different conditions types. PB00 (Gross Price), ZLFR(Land Freight), ZSTX(State Gallonage Tax) are just a few that we have. Currently all the conditions required invoice verification once the p.o. has been received. What we would like to do is automtically post the ZSTX condition without having to do the invoice verification. The other condtion would required invoice verification as normal. Is this possible and if so how should I go about doing the configuration?

From the wording of your question I presume that you do not use a Goods Receipt. Correct me if I am wrong.
A solution for you question would be to use Goods Receipt in your process and configure your ZSTX condition to post an amount against an account that you determine via the standard account determination (similar to SAP's freight conditions).
The amount from PB00 would then be handled via a GR/IR account.
Here's an entry point for Some Selected Conditions
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee131355c811d189900000e8322d00/frameset.htm
Best,
Ralf

ERS without Gr-based invoice verification

Hi all,
I have a question about ERS, greatly appreciated if anyone can give me some inputs.
I create a PO with ERS flagged but not "GR-bsd IV" in po line item, then I do a PO receipt. I read from help that I cannot run ERS in this case. However, in my understanding ERS is just an IV creation process based on receipts, so if the receipt is already there why can't it just create the IV?
I ask this question because in my business case I would like to have more flexibility. So logically, by flagging "ERS" only I can do the following at any time:
1) Post Invoice before GR.
2) Do GR and then ERS automatically.
Anyone if I can do this? Thanks.

Hi,
The standard SAP system is designed in such a way that when you want to go for ERS, the prerequisites are:
1. Evaluated receipt settlement must be flagged in the purchase order item.
2. The vendor must be flagged as being subject to ERS in the vendor master record.
3. The goods receipt must refer to a purchase order.
Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification must be defined for the purchase order item.
4. A tax code must have been maintained in the purchase order item.
5. The order price of the materials may not be an estimated price.
If you want to carryout on the way you want, then it involves new development.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Viswanath

Invoice Verification Requirement

Hello All,
Is there any functionality provided in SAP with the help of which we can control the Invoice Verification of matrial thru QM.
My requirement is that User should not able to Post the Invoice ( MIRO) , until material has been cleared thru quality management .

Hi
Please maintain the invoice block indicator in the QM control key being used for the notification.
This will ensure that unless the QM stock is cleared the Invoice posted will be in blocked state.
Config for maintenance is
SPRO-> IMG->Quality Management -> QM in Logistics-> QM in Procurement-> Define Control Keys.
This is as per standard, but if you want to completely stop the invoice from posting then you need to use the User exit/ Badi to Control this.
Use
MRM_RELEASE_CHECK - for controlling the blocked invoices
INVOICE_UPDATE - Business Add-In: Logistics Invoice Verification
Thanks & Regards
kishore

Invoice verification help

dear all,
when i am booking in MIRO- subsequent debit, i do it with reference to purchase orders.
when i click on "More allocation criteria" (because sometimes i have a lot of PO, not just one) it pop up a window called "reference to purchase orders" in which i can manualy write down Purchase document and Item, and i do it copy paste from excel.
problem is that i can do only 8 documents at the time (this pop up window has only 8 lines), and then i need to click on "down" arrow and again copy-paste next 8 documents.
i know in some parts of sap, there is a button where you can paste from clipboard, but not in MIRO.
is there any possibility to get this "paste" button, or maybe get more than 8 lines in this window.
thank you in advance!

Hi,
Why dont you try Invoice verification in background MIRA transaction code
Regards

Collective invoice verification posting

Hello
I want to generate and post invoices for a group of GR's against a vendor.Is there any way other than MRRL?(as this is not the business case). (something similar to billing due list run VF04 in sales)
Thanks
Krishna

Hi,
I am not sure that I exactkly understand what it is that you are trying to do?
but in MIRO you can post multiple POs against one invoice as long as they are all for the same vendor.
Other than this I am not aware of any bulk invoice verification process (the advantage that the billing due list has is that WE are creating the documents and so we can group things together. In invoice verification we are posting documents that teh vendors create and so we have top process them as we receive them.
The only other thing that may help is ERS (Evaluated Receipt Settlement) which is basically "self-billing". this is where we will not wait for the invoices to arrive from the vendor, instead we will send a payment based on the GRs that have taken place so far (GR qty times PO price = payment value).
this does require a little config and a couple of flags on the vendor and PO but it works fine.
Steve B

Invoice Verification - GRIV and standard R3 matching criteria

Hi,
I am asking what I think is a straightforward question, but has proven difficult to answer so far!
My organisation is reviewing our SAP R3 invoice match criteria, but first we need to establish what they are.
Is SAP standard GR-IV invoice verification as simple as:
1. PO number matches the one on the invoice
2. GRN quantity is less than or equal to invoiced quantity
3. PO line item price is more than or equal to invoiced quantity, or within our tolerance
4. Delivery note number on GR needs to match the one on the invoice
Are there any other fundamental matching criteria that we may be missing?
In addition, we are considering turning off the GRIV flag for certain types of vendors (those providing us with services, for which match criteria 4. above will never match due to there being no delivery note). What are the differences in matching that will occur if we do this? - I have not been able to establish from my research whether a Goods Receipt is still required for the invoice to match if GRIV is turned off, for example...
Thanks,
Peter

This calls for ABAP support .... if you are really interested to it on your own ... try SAP Query that should help you out ... Cheers !!!
Check out this step by step guide
http://www.scribd.com/doc/7071503/SAP-Query-Step-by-Step-Guide-12Aug2008
Edited by: m_n_novice on Aug 12, 2009 2:24 PM

Blocked invoices in 4.6C (invoice verification)

Hi,
We need to have some reporting for our blocked invoices. It would be interesting if we could use transaction MRBR for these purposes but it doesn't work as there are no records in table rbkp_blocked (we don't use 'logisctics invoice verification' but the old 'invoice verification', apparently this doesn't use table rbkp_blocked).
We are kinda stuck on this problem. I find it very difficult to retreive the right data from table BSEG.
Can you help me with this problem. Do you know a report, do we have to develop it (taking data from table BSEG ?)
The requirement is : Reporting on blocked invoices that are either blocked for variances or blocked manually.
Any thoughts on this would be most welcome.
with regards
Erik

Hi
MRBR is report for blocked invoices.
There are three types of blocks
Block due to variances
Manually payment block
stochostically blocked
you need to try with either of one of these options, and see if your invoice shown. Otherwise your invoice is not blocked.
please check.
regards
Srinivas

Align MM and FI Document Numbers in Logistics Invoice Verification

Hi All,
Need help!
Requirement : Align MM and FI Document Numbers in Logistics Invoice Verification
Followed all the steps as per the SAP documentation : Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming Invoice > Number Assignment > Maintain Number Assignments for Accounting Documents
As per the SAP documentation the configuration done should be enough to pass on MM Document No to FI document. But its not working as expected.
I have done the following:
1. Assigned MM and FI documents the same number range and both are in sync.
2. MM Documents are configured to be internally generated,
3. FI Documents are configured to be externally generated.
While during MIRO system generates errror and tells "Accouting Doc number are externally configured" (Not remembe the exact error) ? What is the solution for this issue. I need to align the MM and FI Document Numbers in Logistics Invoice Verification.
Gone through articles on internet and all discuss the same steps and configuration.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BPX/HowtoAlignMMandFIDocumentNumbersinLogisticsInvoice+Verification
Kindly provide inputs as to what could be the missing configuration or probable solution.
Thanks!
Dev
Edited by: dev ahuja on Aug 19, 2010 3:03 PM

Hi,
Following step should be missing in your system:-
*Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction - Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
u2022RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
u2022RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.*
Please check.
Regards,
Gaurav

Out put logistic invoice verification (print out need in chinese language)

Hi All
In MR90 out put logistic invoice verification I am getting output (Printout) in English the requirement is chinese language has to add in output.I know however I need to take help of abaper.I want to know what r the configuration steps to fill this requirement.can any one help me regarding this. Points will be added..
Thanks
Srini

Hello
Check this link and coordinate with ABAper.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/d1/27d457f17b11d287d0080009b98822/frameset.htm
Reg
*assign points if useful

Help required regd ERS Invoice verification.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for