HR Benefits - Age limit for Life Insurance,

Hi,
If we want to create an upper age limit for spousal life insurance and employee life insurance plans that already exist, what is the best method for each?
For the spousal insurance, the Define Dependent Eligibility Rules seems to only apply to medical plans. Looks like you can only create beneficiary eligibility for insurance plans.
Thanks Terry

Hi,
Jay - "Define Dependent Eligibility Rules" is where I could only find medical plans. The life insurance only seems to allow beneficiary criteria.
Ram - I had tried the Age grouping, but it looks like it's controlling coverage costs. So if I create an addtional age range with a cost of $0, they could still have the plan. But they really shouldn't have it any longer. I want them to show up on the participation monitor. At least this was my interpretation. I thought this may be a pretty common requirement.
Terry

Similar Messages

HR Benefits - EOI for Life Insurance

Hi,
We have noticed that EOI is being required when the insurance coverage amount goes down as well as up for coverage level changes.
Is this an expected result?
We have configured "Change of Coverage" at 1x Salary and thought it only applied to increases. For example, going from 1x to 3x would require EOI, but going from 3x to 1x would not.
Has anyone else had this experience?
Thanks,
Terry

Thanks.
The EOI report monitor is what they are using to administer EOI. The config condition as previously described is "Change of Coverage" at 1x Salary for this Life Insurance.
I am trying to ascertain whether coding EOI for a "change" means changes up and down to SAP.
Terry

Is there an age limit for buying from apple? Like ipods, etc?

Can i like just walk up to the shop, pick up an ipod and just buy it with out questions about my age, etc??

Yes.

Imputed Income for Dependent Life Insurance

We are trying to configure Imputed Income for Dependent Life Insurance and having issues with the amounts being calculated.
Using the formual proivded by the IRS the imputed income is calculated as follows:
                                              Dependent
Age                                              57
Coverage Amount                        375,000.00
Less IRS Allowance                                   0.00
Taxable Coverage                        375,000.00
Divided by 1000                               375.00
IRS table factor                                   0.43
Imputed Income                               161.25
Less amt paid w/h post tax                        (124.13)
Adjusted Imputed Income per IRS calc           37.12
SAP calculates the folliwng amounts though. One question is our uncertainty as to which of theswe two WT's is the inouted income.
Imputed Income From SAP                              57.67 /bd1
Imputed Income From SAP                              18.74 /bt2
Any suggestions where to look to get this resolved?

Hello Brent,
I believe that you are talking about wagetype /BT1.
/BD1 - EE Dep. GTLI Cost
This wage type represents the group term life insurance premium costs for an employee's dependent.
/BD2 - EE Dep. GTLI Coverage
This wage type represents the group term life insurance coverage amount for an employee's dependent.
/BT1 - This wage type represents a group term life insurance premium
(employee's dependent) amount which is taxable.
Regards,
Manny

Spouse life insurance for same *** spouse

We are configuring our health/insurance plans to allow same *** spouse as a dependent/beneficiary/enrollee. We were advised to create a new subtype for family member called ‘Same *** Spouse’ rather than just using the existing ‘Spouse’. The problem we are running into is on our Spouse Life Insurance. SAP only allows costs to be determined based on the age of either the Employee, the Spouse or the Domestic Partner. We are not able to choose the new Same *** Spouse. Has anyone found a way around this? How is everyone handling Same *** Spouses (for legally married spouses). Are you just using the existing Spouse relationship? If so, has that caused any issues elsewhere?

Hi,
I'm not sure why you want to use a different subtype. Spouse is not gender specific so it can be used for same *** partner as well (you will get a warning message saying that the gender is the same but it will be possible to save the record and thus have the same functions), and this is the recommended process.
It will make the rest of the configuration much more easier. I actualy believe that it might be discriminatory to have different suptype for same *** spouse, which is probably why SAP did not provide a specific subtype in the the first place.
Best regards
Sarah

AddOn for a small Car and Life Insurance company, Policy management

Hi Everybody,
I am looking for an AddOn for a small Car and Life Insurance company.
I am interested in policy management
Do you know if there is any in the market?
Thanks

Hi,
You need to search SAP Business One Partner Solutions (Add-ons) forum and posted it there if you find none.
Thanks,
Gordon

I cannot use Adobe Cloud due to the age limit?

I have just bought an Adobe Cloud Student and Teacher edition subscription and it is saying that I am under the required age limit. I purchased this product due to my understanding that any student from an accredited public school or high school could use this product and recieve a discount. Please help, I love to edit films for class so is there any way that I am still elligible for this program and if not, why? I am 12 years old.
Also, I have proven my eligibility.

All of the information that is entered for the Adobe ID should be your father's information since he is the one that purchased the subscription. However you go about filling out that information is up to you and your father. If he has internet access in New Zealand he can update the information associated with the subscription by logging into MyAdobe.
I am unclear as to how your proof of enrollment + your father's identification information may affect the subscription, but if he already purchased the subscription it would seem to me that your enrollment verification was accepted. Have you downloaded the applications yet? Can you take a screenshot of the age restriction message you get?
Michael

Aging reports for SD

I need to create an aging report on No. of Incomplete Sales orders:
The report output should have 2 columns.
Column-1 Column - 2
Aging No. of Incomplete orders
Upto 1 days
2-5 days
6-10 days
11-20days
21-30days
greater than 30 days.
How do I do calculate different aging.
Points will be assigned for good answers.
Thanks
Rita

Hello Rita,
First Create Varaible with cal day info object with type intreval and processing type as custoker exit.
2. Go to se 38 and ZXRSRU01 program
3. Write the customer exit there.
When `ZZCALDAY1`.
Dateto (Upper Limit) = Sy-datum
From Sy-datum(Dateto) minus 1 .
This date store into DATEFROM(Lower limit)
For Ex: DATETO = 20.06.2008
When we minus it with 1 day then DATEFROM=19.06.2008
Now update this into the e_t_Range table
L_S_RANGE-LOW = 19.06.2008
L_S_RANGE-HIGH = 20.06.2008
APPEND L_S_RANGE to E_T_RANGE
This will update the value to the varaible as 19th to 20th..
So this keyfigure which is restricted to this variable will give you no of invoices within this date..
Like this create other variables and follow the same code
Please i am not in the system now so i cant give exact code. Ask help from ABAPERS they can help well in this case
Regards
M.A

OBIEE filter/criteria limit for AND/OR operations for a report

Hi
We have a report that has around twenty "OR" criterias and ten "AND" criterias. All the filters are logically correct but report is returning invalid data. However if we reduce some filters then report works fine.
Any ideas of increasing filters limit for a report or reason of the issue.
Umer

Thanks Chaknor,
The report i created would not result any error code/msg.
The only reason i put question here is:
My report has around 50 predicates and is returning data without any respect of the predicates i have applied. However if i reduce some predicates (says reduce them to 20) then my report results correct data.
For the time i tried a work around and created two reports using half of the predicates in one and half in two. but i need everything in one single report.
The most important thing is that when i execute report with 50 predicates, the query i get in NQquery log omits many predicates.
Following is what i get in NQquery log
After removing half of the filters from the report the where clause from the log is given below;
WHERE ( t120650.patient_seq_num = t120867.patient_seq_num
AND t120585.location_seq_num = t120738.location_seq_num
AND t120585.visit_seq_num = t120650.visit_seq_num
AND t120585.provider_seq_num = t120767.provider_seq_num
AND t120650.procedure_seq_num = t121446.procedure_seq_num
AND t120738.practice = 'MSP'
AND t120800.plan_category = 'CORNEL IPA'
AND CASE
WHEN t120650.charge_seq_num = t120650.parent_seq_num
THEN 'NO'
ELSE 'YES'
END = 'NO'
AND t120767.provider <> 'SANDH,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'GRANSR,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'GRANATO,SR'
AND t120767.provider <> 'SANDHAUS,J'
AND t120767.provider <> 'AARONS,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'DYBNER,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'GRANJR,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'AAR-DYBNER'
AND t120767.provider <> 'SUBIETAS,A'
AND t120767.provider <> 'TILLEM,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'WEBER,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'WOLGEL,C'
AND (t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'HIPNY', 'NYBCEMP')
AND ( t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA', 'HIPNY')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
AND ( t120800.insurance IN ('HIPNY')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('AARONSON', 'DYBNER,R', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S',
'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
AND ( t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'HIPNY', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('AARONSON', 'DYBNER,R', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S',
'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('AARONSON', 'DYBNER,R', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S',
'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('DYBNER,R', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('DYBNER,R', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('AARONSON', 'DYBNER,R')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('AARONSON', 'DYBNER,R', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S',
'WEBER,M')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('DYBNER,R')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('DYBNER,R', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('AARONSON')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('AARONSON', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('AARONSON')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('AARONSON')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120800.insurance IN ('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('DYBNER,R')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('DYBNER,R')
OR t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('AARONSON', 'DYBNER,R')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('AARONSON')
OR t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('AARONSON', 'DYBNER,R')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('DYBNER,R')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('DYBNER,R', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('AARONSON', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('AARONSON', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN
('AARONSON', 'GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('ACSHEALTHN', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-08-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('AARONSON', 'DYBNER,R')
OR t120800.insurance IN
('ACSHEALTHN', 'AETNA', 'CIGNA', 'NYBCEMP')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2011-01-01 00:00:00'
AND ( t120767.provider IN ('GRANATO,JR', 'TILLEM,S', 'WEBER,M')
OR t120800.insurance IN ('AETNA')
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-01 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-04-20 00:00:00'
OR t120585.visit_date >= TIMESTAMP '2010-10-01 00:00:00'
AND t120767.provider <> 'WOLGEL,OLD'
However when we increase the filters the where clause is truncated to;
WHERE ( t120650.patient_seq_num = t120867.patient_seq_num
AND t120585.location_seq_num = t120738.location_seq_num
AND t120585.visit_seq_num = t120650.visit_seq_num
AND t120585.provider_seq_num = t120767.provider_seq_num
AND t120650.procedure_seq_num = t121446.procedure_seq_num
AND t120738.practice = 'MSP'
AND t120800.plan_category = 'CORNEL IPA'
AND CASE
WHEN t120650.charge_seq_num = t120650.parent_seq_num
THEN 'NO'
ELSE 'YES'
END = 'NO'
AND t120767.provider <> 'SANDH,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'GRANSR,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'GRANATO,SR'
AND t120767.provider <> 'SANDHAUS,J'
AND t120767.provider <> 'AARONS,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'DYBNER,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'GRANJR,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'AAR-DYBNER'
AND t120767.provider <> 'SUBIETAS,A'
AND t120767.provider <> 'TILLEM,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'WEBER,OLD'
AND t120767.provider <> 'WOLGEL,C'
Need help !

Adding beneficiary to Optional Life insurance in ESS creating new record

Hi,
We have a insurance plan called Optional Life Insurance. IN the portal (ESS) when a employee adds a new beneficiary to this plan, system is creating a new pending record by delimiting the old record to end of that month. The problem is the newly created pending record is asking for EOI (evidence of Insurability).
Adding or deleting of beneficiaries in portal is resulting in EOI being asked. When the same process is done through GUI, there is no problem.
The EOI setting for action in IMG for this plan is "Create Pending record for desired option".
(But this setting is only for enrollment, this should not be reflected when beneficiary is added or deleted, right?)
Regards
Kiran.

Anyone faced such problem before? Any clues?
Thanks.

Credit Life Insurance Fee on BB credit card charges since 2004

Wow, I am in awe that this has been charged to my account since 2004 even though I never authorized it.
I even called and had it cancelled in 2004 but I believe it gets added everytime you make a purchase at Best Buy.
It is currently at $600 a year.
I called today to get it cancelled again and requested I be reimbursed for all charges. I was told it has been cancelled and would get a letter in 30 days as to the status of my request. At this time, I will not be using the credit card ever again nor shop at Best Buy until this is resolved completely to my satisfaction.
I plan to complain to BBC, FTC and any other source I can to get reimbursed.
No other credit card I have does this to me. Granted, I do not look at my monthly statements for all my accounts, something caled TRUST that I grew up with.
{removed per forum guidelines}

Hello, brakford, and welcome to the forum,
Having the Credit Life Insurance program on your credit card can be truly helpful should you ever find yourself in an unexpected situation. I certainly would be furious to find I was paying for it for 11 years without my knowledge though, especially if I was under the impression it was cancelled long ago. I’m sorry to hear of the struggles you’ve encountered while trying to resolve this on your own.
Citibank, N.A. is the issuer of your My Best Buy credit card account. As such, we don’t have visibility into your account to see what might have happened. Having said this, I will be glad to share your inquiry with our Citibank contacts for further review. In order to do this, please know I’ve sent you a private message to gather some additional information. You may view it by logging into the forum and clicking on the envelope icon in the upper right-hand corner of the page.
Thank you for posting,

Aging report for Open Invoice

Hi All,
I need to develop an Aging report for open invoice, there is no indication for open invoice or close invoice since we are using customise DS and DS from third party system. only one key flag we have is clearing date. so kindly let me know how to write the logic for this requirement.. can I use Customer exit for this? I have an Idea to do like
first logic is
*If Clearing date = blank than invoice is = open (by using of this logic we can get all open invoice).
second logic
total number of invoice = current date - document date.
but I do not know how to implement this logic in BEx hnece kinnly advice me whether this logic can be work or suggest with different solution ples..
Regards,

hi,
You can check few default PO reports wid proper paramater in it
or
Can check table EKBE
or
Check PO history in the PO doc
Or
Check the ME80FN
Regards
Priyanka.P

Or some reason everytime i got to my membership for pet insurance it says wrong password the i go back to IE 11 and it lets me sign in with the same password...

for some reason everytime i got to my membership for pet insurance it says wrong password then i go back to IE 11 and it lets me sign in with the same password...What gives..do I have to have 8 different browsers to get into certain accounts...lol...help

Hi vikadelic,
Do you store your passwords in the browser? If so, you may want to update them to make sure that they are trying to login with the right credentials: [[Password manager - Remember, delete and change saved passwords in Firefox]]
If that is not the case, it may be an old stored cookie: [[Delete cookies to remove the information websites have stored on your computer]]

Vendor ageing report for down payment bucketwise

Hi
I have paid many downpayment to various vendors. Now i want the ageing report for the same (i.e. bucket wise i.e. 0-30 days, 31-60 days and so on).
This i am getting for vendor invoices in TCode: S_ALR_87012085 (Vendor payment history with OI sorted list).
Please let me know if the bucketwise report is possible for the downpayment too.

Hi,
Vendor ageing for down payments as well as invoice i use to see from T.code FBL1N by creating layouts.
Choose Arreas after net due date from layout and for that column you can apply a rule that from 0 to Lessthan or equal to 30.
Like that you can create the layouts. In FBL1N you can give this layout (down) so information come in that format.
The one disadvantage is that you have to select manually the layouts and you can see only one ageing information at a time.
Regards,
Sankar

AP Invoice Aging Report for past date

hi guys,
I am running R12.
my requirement is to run AP invoice aging report for past dates (same like AP Trial Balance Report), but the seeded invoice aging report has no option to do so.
would appreciate some help
thanks in advance
Ravi

Hi Senthil,
I am running R12.
my requirement is to run AP invoice aging report for past dates (same like AP Trial Balance Report
if u have any solution to this , please suggest me how to resolve this requierement.
thanks in advance
Ravi
mail:[email protected]

HR Benefits - Age limit for Life Insurance,

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for