HU items' material posting is inconsistent

Outbound delivery confirmations IDOCs are failing when the material has a stock determation rule and is assigned to a Handling Unit.
I reviewed SAP notes 550289, 605629, 952440.
The notes state HUM and Stock Determation are NOT comptabile. This is an issue as ALL deliveries which are PGId from High Jump contain materials which are packed in Handling Units.
Stock Determination rules are set up for vendor consignment.
IDOC Error Message:
HU items' material posting is inconsistent
Message no. HUGENERAL327
Diagnosis
Handling unit MDED8 contains more than one item. The goods movement posts the items to storage locations with different HU-management strategies. The stock contained in one handling unit can be located either only in HU-managed storage locations or only in non-HU storage locations.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Post all items to an HU-managed storage location
Post all items to a non-HU storage location
Repack the items in different handling units so that items that are to be posted to the same type of storage location are packed together.
In my case,
We are posting all items to non-HU storaage location. Why is it still failing? All HU items are being posted to the same storage location and in a NON HU storage location.
Logistics General>HUM>General>MM>IM-->HU Requirement for Storage Locations and Default Values for
When I check for our DWMS plants and their associated storage locations, the HU requirment is UNCHECKED for all storage locations for all plants.
Any ideas? Please explain why the issue still exists or how to over come this issue.

Hello,
I am having the same problem when I want to use stock determination and HUM in the delivery GI. The add-on solution that SAP wants to get paid does not apply to the US country yet. So I am not sure if SAP has solution available.
My workaround is to user mvt 411K to move from consignment to own stock at the time of delivery picking out of warehouse. Then, proceed with normal packing and GI.
Let me know if you have other better solution.
Thanks,

Similar Messages

HU items' material posting is inconsistent (Message no. HUGENERAL327)

Hi,
I am trying to pack a material in an Outbound Delivery (OBDLV), into a container (Packing Material) and while trying to Post GI (PGI), system is throwing the error message:
HU items' material posting is inconsistent (Message no. HUGENERAL327).
In Details of the message it is as below:
Diagnosis
Handling unit 2001422 contains more than one item. The goods movement posts the items to storage locations with different HU-management strategies. The stock contained in one handling unit can be located either only in HU-managed storage locations or only in non-HU storage locations.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Post all items to an HU-managed storage location
Post all items to a non-HU storage location
Repack the items in different handling units so that items that are to be posted to the same type of storage location are packed together.
I am not sure what in configuration is missing opr what master data is not set up correctly.
Please help.
Regards,
Kalyan

Hi,
different cases can cause the error message hugeneral327. In most cases this error message is shown when stock determination is used together with handling unit management. This is not supported in standard.
Please check the attached notes 550289, 605629 and 952440, where it is described, that handling unit management and stock determination does not work together.
Regards,
Ely

Close open items and post balance

Hi,
Do we have any standard reports or programs which will consolidate all the customer open items. I mean clear all the open items and post a sperate transaction with new balance. This is not for fiscal year balance forwarding but has to be done every week for our client.
Please do reply with any suggestions on how to do this. I am due to provide the solution for this.
Regards,
Satya

Thank you for your replies.
I have no idea about this report. Does this report generate balance of all open items till date instead of due in 8 or 20 days? Becz, the balance generated with this report is not matching with the balance on FBL5N.
Also, what is the difference between F-30, F-32, F13E and S_ALR_87012178 report. What is the purpose of these and against what is this cleared?
Please reply how these work. I need to see if any of these can be replaced with the custom program my client has.
Regrads,
Satya

Issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision

Hi all,
I have an issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision. Please find below the details.
Inspection Lot 10000604689
Material        1730PCPBS.0031
Batch           QP611097      GQ02
Out of total qty of 2100 we need to post the following
To unrestricted use                     2,098
To sample usage                         2
Following error appears,
Deficit of SL Stck.in qual.insp 1,638 NO : 1730PCPBS.0031 62GQ GQ02 QP611097
Message no. M7021
Diagnosis
Shortfall below the specified stock level or quantity amounting to 1,638 NO.
System Response
If the message is an error message (E), the above is not allowed.
If the message is a warning message (W), the system will allow your input, but the warning is intended to prevent you entering a wrong quantity.
Procedure
In the case of a warning message, check the quantity entered.
In the case of an error message, change the quantity or terminate processing.
I have checked that quantity 2100 of material 1730PCPBS.0031 is in QI stock. Kindly advice what is the issue and why we are getting the error?
Regards,
Brijesh

Hi Brijesh,
What is the status of inspection lot?
One of the possibilities I think could be inconsistencies between MM and QM.
Have a look on SAP note 48815- Checking possible inconsistencies between MM and QM.
Regards,
Anand Rao

Manual account clear but can see line item after post document

Hi Guru!
I have post account clear with transaction code F-03 with open item zero balance such as
account 214001 balance +500
account 214001 balance -500
when I simulate entry the system not show line item for post document but can post it . I want to know why ?
thank you very much .

Dear,
This is standard behaviour...if line item which you are clearing have zero balance then system will not show any line items since open itemss are cleared....
when you have tolerance difference or the residual posting then only system will show the line item....
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

RFBIBL00 - Residual Item (FB05 - Post with Clearing)

Hi all,
Apparently, I am developing a bespoke program to post open item (FB05) using RFBIBL00. However, I am puzzled when cater for Residual Item, e.g.
There is a incoming payment in a form of cheque, where several customers make the payment using the same bank.
Cheque total amount: USD1000
<b>Item to clear:</b>
Document Number A - USD500
Document Number B - USD500 (Actual amount to be cleared is USD600, thus, USD100 will be input as Residual Item)
From the above, notice that Doc No A is a full payment (cleared item), and Doc No B is a partial payment (opened item still) since there is an outstanding USD100 to be paid by customer.
Do you guys have any experience in handling Residual Item using RFBIBL00? How to input structure BBKPF, BBSEG, BSELK, and BSELP?
Thanks and regards,
Patrick
(Reward Points Guaranteed)

Hello Patrick,
I have the same problem. I need to post residual items during post clearing?
Can you share the solution or workaround you implemented?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Thyaga

Generate 2 line items with posting keys in same table while using FM .

Dear Expert ,
For T-code f-65 ,I have to park a FI Document .i tried with PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01 for parked Document . But i am not successfully park the document .
with the help of F-65 the data Segregate between Tables VBSEGS and VBSEGD with respecting Posting key . but with this Fm entire entry is displaying in table VBSEGS .For example it generated two line items with posting keys '15' and '40' and these both are displayed in VBSEGS whereas posting key '15' has to be displayed in VBSEGD.
when i check this Document in FBV0 Error reflect " G/L Account 0012000 1001 Does not Exist ".
Here my code -
DATA:   XT_BKPF LIKE BKPF OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEG LIKE BSEG OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEG1 LIKE BSEG OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEC LIKE BSEC OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSET LIKE BSET OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BSEZ LIKE BSEZ OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_BKORM LIKE BKORM OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_THEAD LIKE THEAD OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_SPLTTAB LIKE ACSPLT OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE ,
        XT_SPLTWT LIKE WITH_ITEMX OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE .
DATA :    XTEXT_UPDATE LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE SPACE,
          XTEXT_ITEM_UPDATE LIKE BOOLE-BOOLE VALUE SPACE,
          XI_UF05A LIKE UF05A,
          XI_XCMPL TYPE XFELD VALUE 'X',
          XFS006_FB01 LIKE FS006 ,
          XI_TCODE LIKE T020-TCODE VALUE 'F-65',
          XI_PARGB LIKE RF05A-PARGB        ,
          XI_TCODE_INT TYPE TCODE           .
DATA P_RETURN LIKE BAPIRET2 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
XT_BKPF-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BKPF-GJAHR     =     2011.
XT_BKPF-BLART     =     'DZ'.
XT_BKPF-BLDAT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-BUDAT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-MONAT     =     '06'.
XT_BKPF-CPUDT     =     SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-WWERT     = SY-DATUM.
XT_BKPF-USNAM     =     'ABAPER'.
XT_BKPF-TCODE     =     'F-65'.
APPEND XT_BKPF.
XT_BSEG-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-GJAHR     =     '2011'.
XT_BSEG-BUZEI = '001'.
XT_BSEG-BSCHL = '40'.
XT_BSEG-KOART = 'S'.
XT_BSEG-SHKZG = 'S' .
XT_BSEG-GSBER     =     'CPLN'.
XT_BSEG-BUPLA = 'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-WRBTR     =     10000.
XT_BSEG-PSWSL = 'INR'.
XT_BSEG-ZUONR = 'CH. 123456'.
XT_BSEG-HKONT = '241000'.
APPEND XT_BSEG .
CLEAR XT_BSEG.
Vendor line item - required even for header only - BSEG table
XT_BSEG-BUKRS     =     'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-GJAHR     =     '2011'.
XT_BSEG-BUZEI = '002'.
XT_BSEG-BSCHL = '15'.
XT_BSEG-KOART = 'S'.
XT_BSEG-SHKZG = 'H' .
XT_BSEG-GSBER     =     'CPLN'.
XT_BSEG-BUPLA = 'CP01'.
XT_BSEG-WRBTR     =     10000.
XT_BSEG-PSWSL = 'INR'.
XT_BSEG-ZUONR = 'CH. 123456'.
XT_BSEG-HKONT = 'PC04000001'.
APPEND XT_BSEG .
CLEAR XT_BSEG.
CALL FUNCTION 'PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01'
   EXPORTING
     TEXT_UPDATE            = XTEXT_UPDATE
     TEXT_ITEM_UPDATE       = XTEXT_ITEM_UPDATE
I_UF05A                =
     I_XCMPL                = XI_XCMPL
FS006_FB01             =
      I_TCODE                = XI_TCODE
I_PARGB                =
I_TCODE_INT            =
IMPORTING
    XEPBBP                 = CHECK_A
    TABLES
      T_BKPF                 = XT_BKPF
      T_BSEG                 = XT_BSEG
      T_BSEC                 = XT_BSEC
      T_BSET                 = XT_BSET
      T_BSEZ                 = XT_BSEZ
T_BKORM                =
T_THEAD                =
T_SPLTTAB              =
T_SPLTWT               =
          EXCEPTIONS
            ERROR_MESSAGE = 1.
P_RETURN-ID         = SY-MSGID.
P_RETURN-TYPE       = SY-MSGTY.
P_RETURN-NUMBER     = SY-MSGNO.
APPEND P_RETURN.
     p_return-MESSAGE_V1 = XSYMSGV.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        WAIT = 'X'.
ENDIF.
WRITE :/ sy-subrc , sy-MSGV1 .
Thanks ,
Ashish Gupta

Hi Raghuram,
I found a very important SAP Note 103051, details are below.
An IDoc processed by function module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MM (of category INVOIC01) must not refer to the same purchase order item in several invoice items. This is also valid if for a goods receipt-related invoice verification several delivery notes belong to the same purchase order item.
Depending on the system settings and the situation, various error messages can occur (for example, FD240 'Order item ... selected more than once' or M8050 'Balance not zero: & debits: & credits: &').
In this situation module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM generates error message M8321 'Document contains same order item more than once'.
For example, this situation occurs if you work with individual batch valuation and the SD billing document executes a batch split for different batches which belong to the same purchase order item and delivery.
Other terms
INVOIC, SAPLIEDI, M8047, M8, 321
Reason and Prerequisites
This is because of the program design.
Solution
There is no solution for IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MM.
Module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM (only as of Release 4.0) for the logistics invoice verification can distinguish different goods receipts by means of the delivery note number. For this purpose, GR-related invoice verification must be active.
Owing to this symptom, billing documents for single batch valuation with batch split cannot be settled in MM-EDI inbound processing. The settlement generates exactly the situation described (several invoice items for the same purchase order item). In this case, the only solution is to deactivate the billing of the batch sub-items in SD Customizing and to calculate the main item only.
Hope this helps.
Reward if helpful.
Thanks

Document flow not showing material posted details in maint order

Dear Frnds,
In the refurbishment order document flow is not showing material posting documents. Plz guide me to correct the issue. Thanks for all your cooperation.
Guruprasad KS

Dear Thygarajan,
Thx for ur reply. Goods issue button is been ticked in "Define Documentation for Goods Movements for the Order". Still same issue. It is working in different client so i hope not an IMG issues.Plz give ur valuable feedback.
Guru

CIF of single item material master

Is it possible to CIF single item material master (like single PPM can be CIF by R/3 transaction CFP3.)
Regards,
Chetan

Hi,
In CFC9, you have three options for material master changes,
Blank -- No transfer
1 -- ALE change transfer ( periodic )
2-- Immediate transfer
if you are using option 1, you have to run again CFP1
Regards,
Chava

PO Release for - change in item (material) price

Dear Sir,
Can you guide me in following Purchase Order release scenario :
1) While making Purchase Order if there is change in item(material) Price (only increase only) then wants approval.
Regards,
Mahesh.

Hi ,
No , If earlier i purchased material A @ 500 now second time i am purchasing same material A@600 means price change is there ,then i required release (approval).
If it was same like earlier A@500 then not required release (approval)
Regards,
MAhesh.

CG37 - Error: No specification is assigned to the item material

Hello,
I have a problem in transaction CG37.
I have created a BOM for a material A with the component B.
The materials have been assigned to specifications (REAL_SUB) in EHS.
However, when I start CG37 to execute a BOM to BOS transfer I get the following error message:
"No specification is assigned to the item material B" (CM_BOMBOS037) even though the material is assigned to a specification.
Your help concerning this problem would be much appreciated.
Robert
Edited by: Robert LOHMANN on Sep 28, 2011 6:04 PM

Hello robert
we are not using BOMBOS. But in my opinion the error message indicates that a "BOM" position does not have a "corresponding" REAL_SUB. As you may be know: you need ot make a "configuratoin" of the BOMBOS interface. In this you indicate which materials of which type should be analysed if or if not a REAL_SUb is there and if no REAL_SUB is there to create the REAL_SUB on the "fly".
Refer may be to the "best practisese" of EHS or take a look here: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/en/a7/288aa30a6c11d28a220000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
chapter Bill of Material Transfer
Edited by: Christoph Bergemann on Sep 28, 2011 8:12 PM
Edited by: Christoph Bergemann on Sep 28, 2011 8:13 PM

Pop up error message while material posting

Hia,
how can i pop up error message while material posting based on user .
thank u in advance

Hi Ram
Nobody is getting your requirement. Please explain your question.
Thanks & Regards
Kapil Nanda

Diffrence between when-validate-item and post-text-item trigger

What is the Diffrence between when-validate-item and post-text-item trigger, when they are written for the same item and the basic diffrence between when-validate-item and post-text-item trigger.

Two big differences:
1. post-text-item is only available to, and only triggered when leaving a text item, whereas when-validate-item is triggered by the forms validation process, and is available for any item type.
2. p-t-i is a navigation trigger and you cannot invoke it programmatically, whereas the 'validate' built-in can be used to execute validation which fires the w-v-i trigger(s).

MIGO receipt using Item/material number

Hi,
I would like to know whether it is possible to carry an MIGO /goods receipt using an item/material number. if it is possible wat the procedure involved in it.
Thanks,
Maxx

Hello Maxx,
What do you mean by MIGO/GR using Material/item number?
If you mean without any reference document, then yes it is possible using mvt type 501 (GR without PO) , mvt type 561 (Initial stock transfer)
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Converson factor of single-unit batch 011A of material HRCF is inconsistent

Hi,
when i am doing MIGO ,facing error "Converson factor of single-unit batch 011A of material HRCF is inconsistent".
Please help me in this.
Thanks and Regards,
Monty

Please check the Case Conversion maintained in the Material Master > Additional Data as might be the quantity in the Batch is not able to convert as per the conversion factor.
Best Regards,.
Ankur

HU items' material posting is inconsistent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for