HU02 controlling by plant

I made a role only with HU02, PFCG give me two authorization objects:
s_tcode: HU02
M_MSEG_WWA: activity: * plant: 18
I only want the user can use it in plant 18. while I find he also can use other plants!
what can i do to avoid such things?
and when i deactivity the object M_MSEG_WWA, the use still can use hu02 to create any hu in any plant.

Hi,
Su24 check proposals are for reference to administrators or sap to pull the respective authorization objects. Even though we have proposal yes, it should also check in program. it looks like the program RHU_CHANGE_EXISTING_HU doesn't have any checks related to object M_MSEG_WWA.
I made a check using program RSABAPSC, and it resulted authorization object S_SPO_DEV.
In your case, add the authorization object M_MSEG_WWA in SE93 and make a test. This leads to a static check for the values given.
As a last option you need to modify the standard program to include a user exit or an authorization check. Before doing so, you can check with SAP as well on how do they handle it or programmed it.
Regards,
Gowrinadh
Edited by: Gowrinadh Challagundla on Apr 21, 2010 8:49 AM

Similar Messages

Need PO Total value control against plant or purchase org. or business area

Currently we had individual PO release for its price..Also we need to control that particular plant for a particular PO type will not put Purchase order more than the Total Value in Rs. that a plant can spend..
For Ex: Plant A can spend Rs 1 lahks in one month.. it can put many PO. but total PO Value should not be more than 1Lahk..
Guide me wat is procedure..
Thanks in advance

Hi,
option 1
you can use blanket purchase order use limit, if GR is not compulsury in your case, than make a business process that plant can have only one PO in a month.
option 2:
use user exit, in that add value of all PO created in that month and if that value goes up to the required limit, give a error message.
in case, if diffrent plant have diffrent usage limit (in Rs), use a Z-table and maintain the limit for respective plant, user exit will check values from Z-table and give message accordingly.
regards,
vikas

Plant n storage location control

Hi all,
how can we control the plant and storage location control?
If I creaet PO for one plant, I must not create PO to other plant.
Thanks

Hi,
You have created PO for ONE plant only, but one plant have multiple storage location and also created PO to multiple storage location in one purchase order based on authorization.
Plant and storage location control through authorization of create,edit/change,display,print of PO.
Hope, it is useful for you.
Regards,
K.Rajendran

Stock transfer between plants two steps 303-305

Dear All,
We are using version SAP 4.7 we are using stock transfer scenarion between plants two steps. 303-305 source plant they will remove the stock with 303 movement in the receiving plant they will receive the goods against the 303 document number.
at the time with 305 movement type one document generated in that document table MKPF 303 reference number should be updated but in the 305 document the reference document 303 not updated in table MKPF.
why?...any updations required. because i want to develop an user exit at the time of Goods receipt with 305 movement in the receiving plant now it is allowing posting date as <= 303 document posting date it should be allow only >=303 document posting date at the time of 305 document generation in the receiving plant.
in MKPF table the reference document is not updating ....any ideas....
im using the standard Enhancement :MBCF0002
EXIT_SAPMM07M_001.
Regards
Anand..

Hi..
then how can control.
receiving plant 305 document posting date is should be greater than or equal to source plant 303 document posting date how can achieve this?.
via user exit in the reciving plant 305 document the reference document not updated. how to achieve this?...
any ideas..
Regards
P.Anandhakumar

Mixed costing over plants

Hallo,
I want to use mixed costing over plants.
The same material is produced in plant 200 and in plant 210. Both plants are part is the same company. For US-GAAP reasons those materials have to have the same standard price for valuation of the stock and the goods movement.
So, I want to calculate a mixed costing of 60% from plant 200 and 40°% from plant 210.
What did I do :
1. Solution using special procurement type for costing.
First, none of the plants have a special procurement type for costing.
Plant 200 has a procurement alternative (production 60% & stock transfer from 210 40%). I cost for plant 200 giving me a perfect mixed cost.
Then I set the special procurement type for costing in plant 210 to C2 indicating to get the cost price from plant 200.
Calculating this cost price also is OK. But as soon as I save this cost price, the CK13N reports of plant 200 and plant 210 are incorrect because they allow an unending drill-down :
Plant 200 = 60% of Plant 200 + 40% of Plant 210 = Plant 200 = 60% of Plant 200 + 40% of Plant 210 = Plant 200 .....
2. Solution using a procurement alternative per plant.
Here, I do not use a special procurement for costing anymore.
I define procurement alternatives as follows :
Plant 200
   Producing in 200                  60%
   Stock transfer from 210         40%
Plant 210
   Producing in 210                  40%
   Stock transfer from 200         60%
Costing version 1 is linked to those mixing ratios.
First I calculate a pure plant cost price with a costing variant V1 and costing version 2.
Result :
A pure plant cost estimate for plant 200 & a pure plant cost estimate for plant 210.
The I calculate the mixed costing for both plants with costing variant V2 and costing version 1.
Costing variant V2 has a transfer control : cross plant - get "other prices" within the fiscal year, from costing variant V1 and costing version 2.
When I calculate this mixed costing with CK11N, everything goes perfect. I get a mixed cost price in plant 200 and exactly the same in plant 210.
But, when I use CK40N, the intermediate calculations are written to the table KEKO and are used in the calculation of the mixed costing.
This is the result :
Plant 200 = 60% of plant 200 with cost price of pure plant 200
                  40% of plant 210 with mixed cost price of plant 210
Plant 210 = 40% of plant 210 with cost price of pure plant 210
                  60% of plant 200 with mixed cost price of plant 200
Result, I get different and incorrect mixed prices in both plants.
Who can help me. Since this seems to be a US-GAAP requirement, I cannot imagine that I am the only one facing this problem.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Kind regards.
Franciska Brys.

In solution 1, I had a procurement alternative and mixing ration in plant 200 and a special procurement type for costing in plant 210.
Before calculating the mixed costing in plant 200 I had to eliminate the spec.proc.type for costing in plant 210 otherwise, the calculation got into a loop.
Without the spc.proc.type in plant 210, I got a correct mixed costing in plant 200.
Then I enter the spec.proc. type for costing again in plant 210 and calculate the cost price. This copies the mixed costing from plant 200. So far, OK.
But as soon as I save this cost estimate in plant 210, the reports in CK11N or CK13N get incorrect for the first calculation made for plant 0210 while costing in plant 0200 is overwritten by this result. Now the report gets into a loop and you can drill down endlessly.

J2I5 Authorization on Plant

Dear Sir,
We have multiple Plant configured in our SAP system . For Tcode J2I5 , we need to have authorization control on Plant also . But in the default Authorization Control Object available for J2I5 , we find that control is available only on ACTIVITY & EXCISE GROUP objects .
Kindly guide us , as how can we have control on PLANT also .
With thanks and Rgds
Sonia

Generally For all the plants at a single location ,a single Excise group should be assigned, which is the concept behind providing the authorisation object J_1IREGEXT -based on excise groups & actvt only.
There should not be a need to seperately extract a single excise group's Register based on different plant selection, as the register is for the whole Excise location.
However even if the situation demands you can talk to your basis team for a new master derive roll creation where in Master roll you can check Plant & in derive roll the same object can work.
I hope it'll be helpfull.
Regards,
ak

System identification for open loop unstable plant?

Hello,
I have been trying to use system identification on labview. My problem is that my plant is open loop unstable and none of the tutorials or examples I have found seem to cover this so I cannot get it to work. Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I should go about it? My plant has an RC servo so it needs a PWM signal to stimulate it.
Thanks
Adam

adamkse wrote:
I want to control my plant with lead/lag control but I do not know the plant model which makes this very difficult. I cannot theoretically calculate it because the information I need to obtain a numerical transfer function or state space model is unavailable.
I have it controlled with PID at the moment but this is not ideal.
I am trying to use the system identification toolkit to obtain a transfer function but I do not know what to do because the examples do not work for open loop unstable plants.
Adam
Ok Open loop unstable functions cannot be predictably controlled (hence the terms; open loop and unstable,) Not being able to model the actions is a bit of a problem too.
Somehow, someway you need to get some kind of model or some kind of feedback to either provide stability in the plant or close the loop.
Adding hardware (sensors) is the most likely solution.
tell me more about the plant, I do this kind of thing for a living, so I could offer some ideas.
Jeff

Beginning Balance of Accumulated Repair Cost and Budget Control

Hi All,
My client has two requirements which I have problems working on in SAP.
1. How do we put the beginning balance of accumulated repair cost of each equipment? Example Equipment A had $ 40, 000 worth of repairs prior to the company's use of SAP, and this balance becomes the initial balance during repair cost reporting (thus if the first work order issued for that equipment in the SAP system costs $5,000, accumulated cost in cost analysis shatll be $45, 000 alread) .
2. How do we implement budget control in Plant Maintenance, such that a work order that is over budget cannot be released? or needs to be approved by another more superior user before release?
Thanks, answers would be of great help.
Regards,
Andrew

Andrew,
I suspect the only way to do this without Asset Accounting is to create a bespoke ABAP report. You would also need a customer table to hold the repair cost/equipment data. Alternatively, if you have a cost object per equipment (say cost centre) then you could add this value to the cost centre. Either way I would discuss the issue with you finance team first.
In terms of budgetting; this can be done 3 ways:
- Investment programs (IM)
- Projects and WBS (PS)
- Individual maintenance orders (PM)
You can set threshold parameters which determine if the order can be released..
PeteA

Info Record create at Plant level at the time of PO

HI,
Is the system create the Inforecord at plant level not at P.Org level.Problem is system can create the Inforecord at P.Org Level.
If possibility that system create the Inforecord at plant level at the time of create the P.O.
What setting need to configure in the system.
Thanks & Regards,
Andra

Hi,
Go in transaction OMF0 and change the condition control as plant level
for all those plants where the info records should be maintained at
plant level. This will solve your problem.
regards,
JP

Traceability requirement for production but Plant1 is not batch controlled

We have run MM, SD, FI for just over 12 months with only 1 Plant which does not have or need batch control.
We are starting to scope out what we have to do to introduce PP in our food packing facility. This will require batch traceability at material level.
I have been told that it is possible to create a 2nd Plant and configure it for batch control. BUT we will have to make arm's length transaction between the Plants. i.e. MM purchasing transactions in Plant1 then Plant1 issues materials, without batches, to Plant2 which receipts, with batches, and then uses batches in production.
Does anyone have experience of this 2 Plant setup where Plant 1 is NOT batch controlled, but Plant 2 IS batch controlled?
Is it a viable solution?
Kind regards
Jeremy

Hi Jeremy
You can activate batch management on the materials that will be relevant to batch. This can achieved in phased manner.
Batch Management can be controlled at material level. As you are going to start PP as new process, You need do the following
- Shortlist the materials that will be batch relevant in future
- Check stock levels, open purchase orders, PRs etc
- For materials for which stock is already zero, activate batch management on them
- For other when try to activate the batch, check error log and take action according to clear the stock so that batch management can be activated.
I do not agree to have other plant as handing master data before implementation is one time effort, but if you have two plants.. this will remains for life. Think about the efforts and see what you want to do.
Here is little tip
In MM02 you receive a message that you shall look into the log if the batch management indicator cannot be saved.
In that moment, hit enter and a new button will appear, there you can exactly read which document is hindering you.
Usually it is stock in previous period that is forgotten to make zero.
Check in MM03 at accounting view what your previous period stock is.
As you have already cleared current period stock,
you have to add again as much stock in the current period as you have to remove from previous period.
then issue the stock with a previous period date. (you may have to allow previous period posting in MMRV first, and FI period has to allow it as well -> OB52)

Special Procurement Type(SPT) u0096 Cross Plant Costing

Hi,
I am reviewing PC config as part of a post implementation analysis. Is there a report the shows the cross plant costing relationships? I am concerned that a MFG to hub relationship was not followed. For example I have materials in MFG plant 1234 with a SPT from MFG plant 5678. I also have materials in plant 5678 with SPT from plant 1234. I am worried about a circular reference during product costing not real sure which plant to cost first. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Bill

Bill
The SPT for Cost are the same as used on the MRP screens.
The costing program looks to the field of Spec Procurment type fof Costing FIRST, if it is populated it follows the rules. If not populated then it looks to Spec Procurment type on MRP, if not populated, rules in the costing variants are followed.
Our product cost specialist maintains the field via CATT/and custom programs.
Our specific issue was:
Part A is manufactured in Denmark at Std price control
USA plant acquires it from Denmark and uses as a component in equipment.
The SPT on MRP drove both events.
Processes changed and all parts made Denmark were store in the Belgium warehouse at moving average.
The definition of the SPT was changed and suddenly Cost was coming from a moving average in Belgium.
Not what we wanted.
So we created an SPT for Cost and populated Costing 1.
Now cost comes from Denmark and material comes from Belgium.
Hope this helps
Althea

Re:Valuation control at Storage location

Dear Guru's,
I have below requirement :
I want to control the Valuation of a material in Storage location or at material level. i.e that particular Raw material will be non-valuated or all the materials in 1 particular storage location are non-valuated materials
I know that can be control at Plant/company code level ( Plant as valuated or not valuated )
Also is it possible to mantain same raw material code as Valuated in 1 plant & non-valuated in other company code/Plant ?
Kindly guide
Regards,
Ishwar

Hi Ishwar,
If you had mentinoed your business requirement then it would be easier for us to resolve your issue. However it wont be possible to have valuation control at Storage location.
but you can have some alternative solution.
1. Create New Material Type (say ZXX) which should have only Qty update Ticked ( Do not ticket Value update Checkbox).
2. Create Material Code of Newly Created Material Type (ZXX) . These newly created Part code will not be valuated.
Also is it possible to mantain same raw material code as Valuated in 1 plant & non-valuated in other company code/Plant ?
It is very much possible to have Same part code to be valuated in 1 plant and non-valuated in Other Plant, Provided your valuation occurs at Plant level and not the company code level.
Regards,
S Anand

Inforecord - plant and purch org. assignment

Hi Experts,
I would like to have some support / good ideas on following issue:
we have a plant assigned to purchasing organisation 1:1, and only one (standard) inforecord should exist plant / purch organisation related, because I based my calculation on the inforecord price (through calculation variant / valuation variant). But buyes, who are responsible to create the inforecords frequently make mistakes and create inforecord with no plant, only purch org assignment than make a new one with plant and purch org assignment, which sometimes gives us difficulties - especially on price handling during Po creation and calculation.
Could You, pls advise me, which is the easiest way to stop this kind of duplication, and also delete the only purch org. related inforecords - I want to have only the purch org. and plant related inforecords in future.
Thanks in advance

SAP made the customizing for this control a kind of hidden.
instead of putting it into the info record section in IMG, they have this in Conditions section.
OLME > Conditions > Define Condition Control at Plant Level.
here enter a minus for No plant-related conditions allowed
If conditions are not allowed at plant level, you may not create any purchasing info records or contract items relating specifically to the plant.
you can set a deleition indicator in ME15, and then archive the info record with SARA object MM_EINA

No plant is assigned to vendor Trace CO-Interface 22.12.200

Hi,
We are changing pricing conditions of purchase order, in rare cases system is generating a error message as "No plant is assigned to vendor Trace CO-Interface 22.12.2007 00:22:06 ME22N MASTE".
If we are changing the values of condition to some other value the error message is eliminated. Same happens when info record corresponding to that item is flagged for deletion. It seems to me that error is triggered during updation of info record. Kindly through some light of possible solutions.
Thanks and Regards
Avinash
Edited by: avinash goswami on Dec 22, 2007 6:21 AM

Please check if your condition is plant-related in MM->Purchasing->condition->Define condition control at plant level.

How can we control TDS exemption at TAN / Business place level.

Hi Team,
How can we control TDS exemption at TAN / Business place level.
Example Scenario
We have a case where one company code "XYZ" has 4 Plants AA, AB, AC & AD etc.
Each plant has different unique TAN no.
One of our vendor has produced has TDS exemption certificate for one TAN (Plant AA), If we update the TDS exemption details in FK02 system considers for all the plants of the same company code so how can we bring a control at Plant Level or Business place level.
Please guide if there is any possibility.............
Regards,
Rehan.

Hi Rehan,
Personally I do not think there is a way out. The best you can do is create another code for the same vendor which is to be treated as branch and the existing code to be treated as HO. The exemption details can be maintained at the branch code.
Regards

HU02 controlling by plant

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for