HVX200 vs. SDX900 -- for FILM LOOK edited in FCP

What are the latest thoughts on relative strengths & demerits of the two cameras, for shooting movies to edit in FCP, then output to tape & DVD, as well as projection and blowups? It seesm to be a hotly contested question, and the more opinions I can tally the more I learn. - THANKS!
G5   Mac OS X (10.0.x)  

Zebulun - I certainly agree with your point about the sensibility and skill of the operator being the main issue.. (I'm sure Rembrandt could paint very well with amateur brushes). At the same time, though, I want to research this as thoroughly as possible. One controversy is the SDX's ability to look filmic yet sharp when blown up. Some say true HD looks far better, while others debate that vigorously. One discussion on the Panasonic site got so rancorous the moderator closed down the thread! - Anyhow. Thanks for your input. I'm inclined toward the SD beause of workflow and bigger size of the camera.
G5   Mac OS X (10.0.x)  

Similar Messages

  • $$ for filming and editing

    A partner and I participated in a 5-day challenge documentary: lots of coffee and late nights' editing a 7 minute project. The subject loved it and hired us to make a 13 minute version using the footage plus another couple interviews, images, and particulars that she wanted us to follow. Ok. My partner and I are grateful toward her eagerness to be the subject, provide unusual images and music. And we're proud of both projects. While we didn't charge (of course) for the first version, do we charge for some of the first? We proposed one-third of the first. What do'ya think? We spent 30 hours filming and editing on the first; 20 hours additional for the second. My experience? 15 years prophotographer and a handful of 45 minute films on artists. Equip? Pana DVX100B with no "spectical" transitional editing. Intent? Her continued "entry" into the art world. Please, I am not asking for rate info, only percentage, but lay it on me if you wish. I know this forum is for "why can't I open the canvas window," etcetera, so thanks for the lattitude of asking this question.

    If you're trying to justify the amount fo charge her, you can break it down into a few logical points:
    The initial piece was done for your own benefit, but the new additions go beyond the scope of that piece.
    The time, money and effort you put into it were an investment in your own business. Having this new piece would benefit her commercially, and it doesn't seem unreasonable to ask her to make a similar sort of investment.
    The original piece benefitted both you and her. This new piece would have no value or benefit to you, so it seems perfectly reasonable to ask for money for footage that you shot and edited. Remember, she will be using your work for commercial purposes.
    You already have the project 75% complete. And judging from what you say, she won't find a better deal in town for a similar project.
    I'll admit if it was agreed upon that the first piece was mutually beneficial, and no money was to change hands, it would be a bit prickly to charge her. But asking for changes and new content is the beginning of a business transaction in my mind.

  • Monitor setup for film sound-edit

    Hi freaks,
    My monitor setup is 3 Bm5a's and a Bm9 sub. The movie will be mixed LCR, not surround.
    In the (Logic 8) prefs/audio/surround i've got it set to 5.1 with the L monitor on output 1, R on out-2 and C on out-8 of the digi 003 in my studio. Output 1-2 run throughthe Bm9. This way when not sound-editing the set functions normally for music.
    The style is quite lowkey, intercut with documentary footage so i wont be needing the sub on a seperate channel as it wont be used.
    The audio was recorded in M/S which makes things interesting (for me at least) translating this to the 3 channel format.
    The M channel is currently set to surround with the front and rear surround channels turned off. If i need to pan it around i can turn on the front surrounds on a channel.
    The S channel has a gain mono->stereo plugin with the right channel phase inverted. output set to surround.
    Is there a rule for the relative loudness of the center speaker compared to the surrounds? To get them to match i have to drop the center by 20dB!
    The mix will be done in a proper facility, but i want to have everything well sorted out. The Pyramix/Protools crowd aren't big Logic fans.

    Output 1-2 are connected to the "main-outputs" on the 003 which are thus controlled by the volume knob. The center monitor on output 8 isn't. This is where i was getting the volume difference. I'm presuming they should be the same volume.

  • FXplug for Film Look

    I used to have a technique in FCP to make the footage look more filmic, where I'd duplicate the video track, apply a slight blur to the bottom track and blend them Soft Light composite mode. I remember when FCP 5 came along I saw an FXplug demo'ed that gave approximately that effect. But I can't remember which filter it is. Does anyone know? Thanks very much.
    Mac Pro Quad 2.66   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   FCP 5.1.4

    Hi:
    Look if you find something here:
    http://toolfarm.com/pluginfinder/index.php?FxPlug
    Hope that helps !
      Alberto

  • Looking for Pre-Rendered Editing / Color Grading Workflow suggestions.

    Looking for Pre-Rendered Editing / Color Grading Workflow suggestions.
    All my material is rendered via RenderMan, our resolution is 1280x544, and our format is generally .exr in 32 bit space.
    Our editor has been converting over to 32-bit tiffs, and using Apple Intermediate Codec for editing, mostly for speed concerns.
    We need to re-vamp our workflow so that we can edit our footage, and then do color grading of the edit head to tail to smooth the look between scenes. We want to do this in Color, being fed by Final Cut Pro's timeline.
    We want to keep our bit depth as high as possible when coming into Color.
    My question is, does anyone here have any workflow suggestions for doing what I am talking about.
    I wasn't sure if we should just export and EDL from FCP and try to get Color to load our single frames from that. Or if there is a special Quicktime wrapper we should be using, or converting our 32-bit .exr files into some other format more readily available for using in Color?
    Any thoughts would be great, thanks in advance!

    You're not going to get anywhere beyond 10-bit. That's it.
    Try encoding to 10-bit LOG dpx if you need upscale RGB.
    jPo

  • Im looking for a MacBook that is worth the money and decent for gaming and editing, any suggestions?

    Im looking for a MacBook that is worth the money and decent for gaming and editing, any suggestions?
    There all so AWESOME!

    Then you are best to get a Macbook Pro. Your real aim should be the graphics card.
    You won't be doing really good gaming on a discrete graphics card sharing RAM.
    Depending of coarse what games you play.
    eg. card games / COD games.

  • ARTIST WANTED: For creating a film look

    Hi
    I'm just wrapping a shour film. It is about 20-30 min long and I need someone to go over what I have shot on mmy didgital camera and give it the film look. It is a student film so the budget is limited but I want to offer a fair price.
    Some examples:
    and
    Using magic bullet is fine.
    Here are some shots from my film:
    Thanks for you time I look forward to your response
    Michael

    Send me a private message concerning your posts for an artist and we can discuss it.

  • F2 Edit in JTable -- standard for all look and feel ?

    hi,
    I use a robot to simulate a F2 when a column is in focus in a JTABLE so that user can just type without having to type the <F2> key.
    My question is:
    Is F2 (to get a column in edit mode) for JTABLE standard for all look and feel (metal, X-windows ..) ?
    Thanks.
    Tony

    Read the JTable API. There is a link the gives the
    standard key assignments for the standard LAF's.thanks. got it.

  • Which of the mac laptop is good for film editing?

    Please I need to kwn the right mac laptop for film editing?

    pro or semi-pro?
    Any high-key MBP with SSD and lot of memory, preferably i7 core
    plus one of this: http://www.promise.com/storage/raid_series.aspx?m=192&region=en-global&rsn1=40&r sn3=47
    for home video once a month - any with lot of HD space and memory
    * any means 2011-2012 MacPro models

  • Why can't my HD to SD SHORT film look good? Best Encode?

    I have a 12 minute short film on HDV. I imported it to FCP5 and then DVDSP4 and created an HD-DVD and it looked GREAT. Then I found out my computer is pretty much the only DVD player that can play the HD-DVD I had created. Thus began my journey to make a decent SD-DVD, and so far I am not even close...
    HERE'S WHAT I'M DOING:
    1. I used FCP to downconvert from HDV to DV (I don't have access to the camera to use it downconvert option). I'm sure this step is where the quality drops at least 4 generations!
    2. DVDSP5 > Preferences > Mode: Two Pass VBR, Bit Rate: 5.5, Max Bit Rate: 8.5, Motion Est: Best
    IMAGE PROBLEM:
    Lots of pixelation in darker areas of the screen. Places i could see in HD are now just black and pixelated black at that.
    TWO QUESTION:
    1. My main annoyance is this: When I burn the DVD, it only burns about 20% of the DVD (HD-DVD would use 60%). I have the space on my DVD-R, why can't I utilize this space and burn 90% of this space with data to make my film look good?
    2. iDVD did a better job of making the SD DVD look good. So I know there is something i could do. I've never used Compressor. How can I encode my HDV for use in SD DVD environement in DVDSP5?
    Any help will be much appreciated... I hope answers to these questions helps others as well...
    Best,
    AJ

    AJ -
    Thanks for your reply -I hope i can clarify below.
    Yes i have been editing the sequences using native HDV 1080i.
    When comparing the output of the converted formats here is what i did.
    I have a Sony a HC1 HDV Camcorder. I captured and edited all clips with native HDV. Then i recorded back the HDV material back into the camera (HUGE issues with doing this in FCP - but ill leave that to another thread)
    From there i did two things
    1) I sent the native HDV Final Cut sequence to compressor and set it to DVD, 90Min, Best quality, 2pass VBR. I burned a DVD with DVDSP4 with this encoded sequence
    2) i played back the HDV Sequence from my sony camcorder back into the television directly - but using the composite video output (not using the high definition component output).
    3) I set my Sony HDV cam to output via firewire as standard DV (eg - i let the camera do its own HDV to DV downconvert). from there i recaptured back into FCP, compressed with the same compressor settings, and sent to DVDSP4
    I compared side by side the content from all three options. Hands down Options 2 and 3 looked MUCH better than option 1.
    Here is what i noticed
    1) A lot of motion artifacts with option 1. This especially when the camera pans and moves. I think this has to do with the way interlacing during downconversion happens. If i run the FCP sequence through a de-interlace filter it actually does come out better - though not as smooth since you are loosing 1/2 the frames.
    2) A lot of digital artifacts. pixellation and such like. It looks almost like one of those old VCDs in terms of image quality.
    I had searched the forums and found that many other people are having the same problems - so i know that i am not alone on this one (unfortunately). I do find it frustrating that a very expensive >$1000 application suite which claims to support HD has so many issues with editing in HD (this is just one of the issues.. others are that you cannot reliably export HDV back to tape, there are issues with editing multi-cam with HDV with more than 3 sequences... etc..).

  • QM for Film Mfg. Industry

    Dear All,
    I want to know about Quality Management in Film Mfg. Industry / Paper Industry.
    Please tell me, where i can get information for this.
    I have a query in QM for Film Mfg. Industry.
    The problem is:
    Film production is in ROLLs. Base unit of measure is KG.
    I want to segregate defective area inside the roll, while usage decision. area is in sq.meters
    There is no extra field for this in standard transaction, as per my knowledge.
    Please help.
    my email id : [email protected]
    GNK

    I can't help you specifically with your question.  But you might want to look at SAP's Mill products solutions.  What you describe is very similar to what happens in the mills that produce things like carpet or rolled sheet metal.  The carpet and metal are made in rolls measured in sq. ft.  but very often managed and stored as EA.  Defections are related to certain areas of the roll. 
    The following is from SAP's documentation on this solution, bolidng is mine.
    Purpose
    The SAP Mill Products component adds sector-specific functionality to an ERP system to satisfy the complex requirements of mill industries (e.g. metal, wood, paper, textiles, construction materials, and cable sectors).
    These industry segments differ from others primarily in that the materials used have a large number of characteristics and variants. The materials in the segments listed above are also predominantly area-based (e.g. paper, textiles, plastic film) or length-based (e.g. cables, piping). Account must be taken of these material characteristics throughout the entire supply chain.
    To cater for the particularities of these industry segments, SAP Mill Products features processes and functions that cover the entire supply-chain cycle – from product design and configuration, through planning, order processing, capacity planning and production, to final delivery. Additional functions are available in costing and inventory management. SAP Mill Products are also integrated into Quality Management, Financial Accounting, and Controlling.
    Here's the link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_dimp50/helpdata/EN/4e/1796374b088e5ce10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    Craig
    Edited by: Craig Snyder on Mar 7, 2008 5:35 PM

  • I know.. not another film look question, but here is goes...

    Hi all i hope you can help me here.
    Im used to doing safety, corporate, induction videos so Ive never been interested in getting the "film look" But now Ive got a music video to do and i really don't want it to look interlaced.
    Now i did some test on my HVX200 25p, and read up on it a little. Which brought me to my question.
    I know that when shooting with real film cameras AND HD 25p cameras there is the rule not to pan very fast because it becomes jittery. But when i did my tests outside with my HVX200 25p PAL on a tripod (no panning) my footage seem a whole lot more jittery that film movies i see on tv. Its so jittery i cant use the footage! im to scared to do the music video on 25p.
    So now i want to know, am i doing something wrong? Is the shutter speed or the way you capture in FCP got anything to do with the jittery? Or is 25p just that jittery?
    Another question. Does anybody have some tips to get a better look and feel to my music video? plug ins? or whatever?
    Thanks so much for your replies.
    Andre Meyer

    Hi Meyer,
    The reason I said your video still looks jittery is because you have not graded or used any additional adaptors on your cam. Turning on a progressive shutter alone will just make your VIDEO look like 24/25P video! The movement is greatly exaggerated! The point I was trying to make is that once you have graded your footage and if you are lucky enough to use a 35mm adaptor, much of that jitteriness (if that’s a word?!) will not be so noticeable. Remember, if it goes away completely, you are back to square one almost! Its about how acceptable you can get with the 3 components I was talking about in my previous post.
    I dont own an HVX200, but I have a V1E (not as good as the HVX200) and I find the cinema Gamma not that great as a default.. I have to tweak it quite a lot to achieve the all important contrast and saturated colours. As for your HVX, just have a play until u get a look u like. The Cinema Gammas on the Cheaper Canons are dreadful and make the cam lose all their contrast! I guess this varies a lot with the mid-priced prosumer cams?!
    You don’t need to own a 5D MkII (an ergonomic disaster in my opinion unless u have the full rail kit!) to have that 35mm DOF control. There are quite a few 35mm adaptors out there that have attachments for many types of video cameras. There are users in this forum I think that use these types of adaptors with the HVX200’s. However, such equipment is not cheap.. and of course a good quality stills lens’s are not exactly cheap either!
    So to summarise:
    1. Use a progressive frame rate 24/25P
    2. Colour Grade to film... Best bet is to use Apple Colour... this is a really good colour corrector which has various preset that’s you can tweak and work pretty good as the film look. Of course you will need to experiment to get the effect u want. Alternatively, you can use Magic Bullet Looks.. which can be use used as a Plug-in to FCP, and is like Apple Colour on Steroids! It doesn’t offer the same amount of control as Color, but has some really interesting presets that can be easily tweaked.. and the good things is, this is all done without leaving FCP.. so its quick.
    3. If you want to go the whole way and go for a 35mm adaptor.. then do your home work. Do you currently own a select of still lenses? Canon L series or Nikon Pro series? Of course u don’t need the pro lenses, but in this set up the quality of your stills lens becomes really critical! Take a look on YouTube and see the effect these adapter give, they can be quite amazing! Be prepared to spend over £2500 for the adaptor alone!
    4. And of course, remember technique when shooting like this.. these adaptors do stop down your camera, you will probably have less light to play with. When u r tracking etc, DOF is really critical and can be difficult to master at first.
    I don’t have any 35mm adapter, i try to achieve the film look by using steps 1 and 2..the result, well... its ok but often means I have to mess about with camera distances sometimes to achieve a decent DOF. Swings a roundabouts!

  • Simple solutions for cinematic look with 60i video?

    I'm sure this questions pops up over and over but I'm getting a huge headache trying to sort everything out through my searches, especially as a beginner to the film making world.  I'll get right to my questions, but first here is the equipment I am working with:
    Camcorder = Sony HDR-XR500, shooting in 1920 x 1080 60i AVCHD format
    Software = CS4 Creative Suite
    I recently threw together a 10 min movie of a trip I just arrived back from using Premiere Pro, and while it was a lot of fun putting together I really have no idea if I went about it the right way.  I want to practice taking a clip of mine and converting it to that cinematic look, and hope someone can help guide me through some steps.
    Here is what I want to achieve:
    - 2.35:1 pixel ratio
    - 24p or similar effect (trying to figure this out makes my head spin)
    I know color correction has a lot to do with the cinematic look, but I realize there are many ways of going about this so I'll refrain from asking any questions in regards to this for now.  (I did find using the Fast Color Corrector and setting Saturation to 75%, and Input levels to 20, 1, 220 gave a nice film look)
    Step 1: What settings should I use to create my new project?
    Capture Format = HDV?
    For the sequence presets should I use AVCHD 1080i30 (60i) non-anamorophic?
    Step 2: If I want to create a 2.35:1 aspect ratio, should I simply crop my clip?  I think I read somewhere for 1920 x 1080 video, crop 14% from top and bottom?  Or should I crop when I export out the movie?
    Step 3: What would be the simplest/quickest way of getting that 24fps look using Premiere Pro or After Effects?  I know shooting in 24p is obviously the easiest way, but should I simply deinterlace my 60i video by right clicking clip>Field Options> Always deinterlace to achieve similar effect?
    Step 4: Exporting video....again so many options I'm not sure what to do here.  Basically, could someone provide me with the best exporting options for the format I'm trying to achieve for:
    - Posting on Internet
    - Viewing on computer
    - And viewing on blu-ray
    I really appreciate any help to the above questions.  Big thanks!

    Step 1: Capture settings are irrelevant for AVCHD on that camera.  Just copy the entire folder structure intact to your hard drive.  Pr will find the copied footage through the Media Browser panel.  You may even be able to edit directly from the camera's HDD.  You should try it and see.
    Step 2: 1920x816 produces a 2.35:1 aspect ratio.  Assuming all of your action occurs in the exact vertical center of the shot, then you should crop 132 pixels from top and bottom.  Placing your 1080 footage into a custom progressive sequence of those dimensions should get you what you want, as long as you don't have Default scale to frame size selected in Preferences.
    Step 3: This is the tough one.  To get 24 fps out of 30 fps, one frame out of every 5 needs to be dropped.  This will produce perceptually jerky playback, especially if any motion at all is present.  So the remaining frames must be blended together in some way to smooth out the bump where the missing frame is.  Using AE to accomplish this is, IMHO, the best solution for an all-CS4 workflow.  In AE, you have 2 choices: Frame Mix and Pixel Motion.  PM produces better results, but FM renders faster.  If you haven't done any editing of the clips in Pr yet, then the best idea would be to convert all of the footage in AE before importing it into Pr.  If you've already got edits in place in Pr, then you can select all of the clips in the sequence and choose File | Adobe Dynamic Link | Replace with After Effects Composition.  Either way, each clip in AE must be individually interpreted to Separate Fields/Preserve Edges.  The comp settings must be set to 24p.  Then Frame Blending must be enabled for the comp, and finally, each Frame Blending Layer Switch must be set to either Frame Mix or Pixel Motion.  If you do use Dynamic Link, be sure to turn *off* Frame Blending in Pr, because AE has already taken care of that.
    Step 4: Because rendering will be so intensive and take so long, I recommend exporting an intermediate file from Pr, then re-importing that file to be used as the source for the various export formats.  Otherwise, you'll have to render all over again for each individual export format.  For web, I recommend Flash.  For computer viewing, it depends on your delivery method (CD, DVD, Download, External Hard Drive, Flash Drive, etc.).  For Blu-ray, either H.264 Blu-ray or MPEG2 Blu-ray.
    -Jeff

  • Film look and final presentation techniques

    I have a feature film that is in the final stages of editing. I recently got the Final Cut Studio package with FCP 5, Studio Pro 4, Motion, Soundtrack, etc.
    The movie was shot on DV and looks about as good as it could. I know there are a lot of 'film look' techniques out there, some of them work, some of them look terrible. Unfortunately I don't have the time to experiment at this point, so if anybody can point me in the right direction it would be appreciated.
    I also have a copy of Magic Bullet from a couple years ago, but I don't know much about the program. I'm pretty good about figuring these things out with a nudge, though.
    Thanks.

    Magic bullet does good stuff. There is a new version of that due out soon.
    Also go to www.nattress.com and look at the Film Effects filters.
    Cinelook is another route.
    Welcome to the forums, BTW.
    And it would be good if you could do a search for your topic next time, as this question comes up at least once daily, if not twice.

  • DVCPRO HD vs Uncompressed HD for best RT edit experience?

    Assume best available MAC and raid.
    Considering Pana HVX200 P2 DVCPRO-HD source and HD DVD finish, what is the better workflow in terms of ease of edit, best realtime performance, and finish to HD DVD?
    1. Edit [native] DVCPRO-HD, then ?? to prep for HD DVD; or
    2. Upconvert DVCPRO-HD to uncompressed HD, then ?? to prep for HD DVD.
    BACKGROUND:
    I've been editing SD on PC (Premiere and Edius) for many years and am considering a move to [can't believe I'm saying this] MAC/FCP for the HD realm. Target is high quality HD DVD delivery of event video (weddings, etc.) for customer view on their HDTVs.
    Currently use Sony VX2000 for DV; Looking seriously at the new Pana HVX200 for HD.
    Dell P670   Windows XP Pro  

    Thanks David. I'm aware of all this. For future extensibility, the MAC and storage I will purchase will accomodate anything up to Uncompressed 2K HD. However, for the near-term I will be sourcing only DVCPRO-HD (from the HVX200 via the options you cited).
    Let me rephrase my specific questions:
    1. EDIT: Given MAC/storage/monitor that will well accomodate uncompressed, is the *FCP edit experience* better with native DVCPRO-HD or uncompressed (though it may be counter-intuitive, the FCP manual seems to suggest uncompressed provides a better RT edit experience). Has anyone out there experienced both ways?
    2. AUTHOR to HD DVD (whether Blu Ray or 'HDDVD'): Is it easier/faster to go from DVCPRO-HD timeline or 10-bit Uncompressed 4:2:2 timeline to Hd DVD? Again, has anyone out there had both experiences?
    Thanks!
    moldy

Maybe you are looking for