IM - IM52 Original assigned budget is automatically multiplied by 100

When assigning the original budget to a Project (from a node) in the Investment Progam (transaction IM52), the amounts entered are automatically multiplied 100, but the available budget for the project is correct and the amount discounted in the Node above remains correct as well (not multiplied).  The same occurs when doing supplements or returns.
Can you please tell why is this happening, how can I solve it and what consequences may  it bring?
Thanks in advance.  Regards.

Hi,
1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
As per the standard system budgeting is done against the actual cost only. And until you settle your order the actual cost from
maint order are not getting transfered to IO. Once they are transfered system is checking for the budget.
2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly added to the available budget of internal order.
This is similar to first point, when you return goods there will be negative cost on the order, this has to be settled until that system will not compare the IO budget with maintenance order actual cost.
3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
The budget you have assigned is at IO, how can system will check the budget while issueing goods for maintenance order. We may have to develop or use some user exit over here. Which will trigger checking of budget from the settlement receiver IO for that maintenance order.
I think you may have to go for development. These are my observations from my experience.
Regards,
NNR

Similar Messages

  • Assigned Budget in Annual Budget Table (BPJA)

    Hi,
    Hopefully someone can help me shed some light into my question.
    I need to create a budget report which will display the annual values of a Projectu2019s budget and the available budget. Now I know there are at least 2 budget tables, which is:
    BPGE : Total for Overall Value
    BPJA : Total for Annual Value
    Since I need annual values, I wanted to use table BPJA (Total for Annual Value) of which I need to extract Budget and Assigned Budget values. However when I look at the table, no records exist for value type = u201842u2019 (Assigned Budget). There exists only value type u201841u2019 (Budget) or u201847u2019 (Program Budget). This is different with table BPGE, where records exist for assigned budget.
    In accordance to above values in table BPJA, the Assigned Budget column in t-code CJ31 (Display Original Project Budget) also doesnu2019t display any values for annual rows. However, the Assigned Budget for overall row is displayed.
    Now my question: is that how the table is normally behaved, i.e. value type u201842u2019 (Assigned Budget) is only written to table for Overall Value (BPGE) and not for Annual Value (BPJA)? Also that CJ31 only displays Assigned Budget values for Overall and not for Annual Rows? Or did I miss something? I need the assigned budget value because I need to calculate the available budget, whereas calculating the values from other tables (COSP, COSS, RPSCO) would require a more complex extraction.
    Iu2019ve searched in the SAP forums and also SAP Notes and couldnu2019t find anything that mentions about the above problem Iu2019m having.
    Thanks in advance for any of your input.
    cheers.

    Hi Abdul,
    How's your Budget Profile setting which allows BPJA to display Assigned Budget? Is it Time Frame = "Annual values" only and Availability Control with "Overall" unchecked?
    I just tested using another setting where only Annual values is checked and Overall tickbox in Availability Control must be unchecked, and the assigned budget does show up in BPJA. Seems like this setting might be why Assigned Budget won't show up in BPJA table, since value type "42" is tied to business transaction "KBFC" (Availability Control). Based on the test result, Assigned Budget only shows up in either BPGE or BPJA based on the availability control, but not both. If the availability control is set to Overall then value type shows up in BPGE, whereas when it's set to Annual then value type shows up in BPJA.
    Would be great if someone can back me up on this conclusion.
    Thanks.

  • Mismatch of Assigned Budget in CJ33 & Report S_ALR_87013558

    Hi,
    I would like to inform there is an issue in mismatch of assigned budget value in CJ33 wrt hierarchical report(S_ALR_87013558). Request you to suggest to fix the issue.
    Thank you for your coopearation.
    Regards,
    Ranjan

    Ranjan,
    removing a column in a report will not affect at all at the values observed. Therefore,
    it is unuseful to do it.
    If there are inconsistencies in the assigned value, i suggest you to take the following steps:
    1. Excute the report BPDIST03 via SE38 for the project in question. 
    2. Excute the tnrx CJEN.(Reconstruction of project information DB)  
    3. Excute the trnx CJBW.(Deactivate the availability control)      
    4. Excute the trnx CJBN.(Reconstruction of availability control)   
    5. Excute the trnx CJBV.(Activate the availability control again)  
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Martina

  • ECC IM report, the available and assigned budgets are not correct

    Hi All
    Can any one tell me why there is a difference in the ECC IM report, the available and assigned budgets are not correct on program position level.
    But individual investment order level, they are correct..
    The report we are running is : S_ALR_870122806 .
    Any help higly appreciated and points are assigned .
    Cheers
    ravindra .

    Hi,
    Tcode GR23 , Under 1VK Report library, Choose Characteristics Tab for Company Code Select BUKRS,and GSBER for Business Area.
    Regards,
    Shankar K B

  • Assign Budget is Doubled after Partial settlement reversal

    Dear Experts,
    When i m creating Cj88 Partial settlement of Rs.100/- & revesrsed it because of wrong Asset Value date.
    Again i done CJ88 for Rs.100/- with new Asset value date.
    But after reversal of settlemet & again settlement, my assign budget amount getting doubled of settlement amount i.e. Rs.(100+100=200) i, that its blocking budget for of Rs.100/- extra.
    Its booking doubled budget as same amount of settlement amount.
    Please suggest, its happen in production & not allowing to create PO for balance budget.
    Please help.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Amey

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply,
    I checked than availability control anaylsis,
    I found this entries,
    COSP 2011 22 0059000001  RMBE D INR                        24,517,023.30  INR
    COSP 2011 21 0059000002  RMBA D INR                                 0.00  INR
    COSP 2011 11 0020030001     0001322611 COIN D INR          ___41,282,596.54  INR___
    COSP 2011 11 0020030001     0001322611 COIN C INR          20,641,298.27- INR
    COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN D INR          10,784,468.10  INR
    COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN C INR             245,626.18- INR
    COSP 2011 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN O INR          10,538,841.92- INR   S
    COSP 2010 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN D INR          10,102,456.35  INR
    COSP 2010 04 0059000001     0001322611 COIN O INR          10,102,456.35- INR   S
    In this entries Rs.41282596.54, is showing problem, Addition of Actual 41282596.54 + Commitmnet Rs.24517023 = Total Amount 65,799,619.84.
    In actual amount should be Rs.20641298.27 instead of Rs.41282596.54 then it will show,
    But when run same cyscle its showing propely in Develeopement & Quality, its showing same amount but Rs.412/82596.54 is not added in actual amount.
    It should show addittion of 2451023.300+20641298.27 = 45158321.54
    My actual amount should be 4518321.54.
    Please suggest, why this amount is added in actual amount or assign amount.
    thanks & reply,
    arvind

  • Removing assigned budget from commitment item.

    Hi.
    I am facing a problem with how to restructure commitment item in our R3 system. The problem is that when the commitment item has been created in our system, person responsible chose "Not Directly Postable" option though it should have been "Directly Postable". Right after that budget has been assigned to this commitment item. I went through a number of FM documents and they all say that feature "postable"/"not postable" is not changeable to begin with and on the top of that commitment item cannot be changed once it has any kind of budget assigned to it. As I understand I need to roll back assigned budget (thank God, nothing else has been done), then delete this commitment item, then create it again. I couldn't find anything that explains how to do that. There is a Tcode FMDOCREV but it reverses the whole document and this is not an option for us as by the same document budgets have been assigned to a number of commitment items and spent from them already.
    To summarize my post: I need to remove assigned budget for my commitment item (the rest seems to be easy).
    Please, advise.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Nazim

    Hi,
    Maybe you can use this work around solution:
    1. create a direct postable and budgetable CI
    2. in BCS derivation tool, replace the old CI with the new CI when applicable
    3. in FMDERIVE, add the new CI to the applicable derivation rules
    4. transfer the budget from the old CI to the new CI using FMBB.
    If your FM master data is year-dependent, you have the option of use back the old CI by checking the postable indicatior for the new FY.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • Assigning budget profile to already existing project

    Hi All,
    Please suggest how can we assign budget  profile to already existing project .

    Hi Vishal,
    You can go the Project builder, open the particular project and in the detail screen of the project definition, enter the budget profile in the control data tab page.
    Or goto SPRO->Project system->Costs->Budget->Stipulate default budget profile for Project definition and assing the bedget profile.
    Or enter the Budget profile in the Controlling tab page of the Project profile.
    You can do all these for existing projects.
    regards
    Pratap.V

  • IM52-Load Order Budget Upload Program

    Hi All,
    I'm Working on IM52-Load order budget Change BDC Load Program.i'm using Call Transaction for it.
    here i'm getting a problem while recording(With SHDB) the tcode IM52, It showing the error like 'no measure found'.
    But the same error i'm not getting while creating manually(i.e., With out SHDB).
    So i developed the program by own using technical information, instead of recording in SHDB .
    and i ran the program, but i'm getting the same error "No measures Found"
    can any one tell me how to develope the BDC program for IM52-Load order budgets change.
    should i follow in different way instead of normal BDC programm?
    Thanks in advance
    Ramesh

    Hi Caforio Claudio,
    Pls check if you have (If the Investment Measure is Internal Order)
    You performed the commitment carryforward for measures belonging to the investment program - KOCF
    You performed the budget carryforward for measures belonging to the investment program - KOCO
    which are pre-requisites for Budget Carryforward for Investment Programs...
    Pls check and revert back...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Internal order error: AuC missing for origin assignment

    Hi,
    We had this requirement of blocking Internal Orders (their use has been discontinued from the past 2 years). I used KOK4. Many of the orders got blocked except for those of Order Type Capex. The following error appears:
    AuC missing for origin assignment LHI
    Message no. AY089
    Diagnosis
    Object concerned: Order ####### .
    The object has investment profile ABCD and origin structure IM. In investment profile ABCD, the indicator "AuC per origin structure and origin assignment" is set. However, there is no asset under construction for origin assignment LHI of origin structure IM.
    System Response
    Processing is not carried out.
    Procedure
    Create the missing asset under construction online (Change object: Extras --> Asset under construction).
    When I go the the master data of that particular Order & click on Extras --> Asset under construction, I can see many Source Assignments with assets, but against Source Assignment LHI, the asset is blank & Status shows "Create AuC"
    My queries are as follows:
    1) Is there any other way I can block internal orders?
    2) If not, then can I create Assets under Construction separately, or do I have to go to each of the Internal orders & create them (600+ orders) ?
    3) Will the system allow me to create AuC now when the Order status is REL AUC AVAC BUDG GMPS ISBD SET ?
    4) Any other suggestions?
    Request your expert advice.
    Regards,
    Sangeeta

    Any suggestions?
    Regards,
    Sangeeta

  • Assign budget is three time of overall Budget in T-code CJ30

    Dear Sir,
    I am facing a problem in my one WBS of project that when i am seeing the assign amount in cj30 it is looking three times of my current budget but another reports like cje0 & ALR. reports it is seeing perfect value i can't understand how it's can happened.
    Pls. advice.
    Regards,
    Vishal Kr. Sharma

    Hi,
    According to the SAP Performance assitant:
    "Assigned consists of commitment and actual postings. In PS, it also includes plan values of assigned networks and orders."
    so when you are in Tcode CJ30 goto EXtras>Availability control->Analysis.
    this will help you understand the Assigned budget.
    I will sugrest to Run Tcode:CJEN in case you have changed the AVAC settings after allocating the budget.
    hope its useful.
    Reward points if useful..
    thanks..

  • Assigning the role automatically when a user is created.

    Hi all,
    we are usign the EP 7.0 eph1 sp6 . we have a requirement that:
    When we are creating a new user and click save, then a user is created and to that user automatically a role should get assigned (without manual assignment of role to user). the role will have the framework page etc.
    and suppose we are assigning some role to the same user the above assigned automatic role should be deassigned automatically again.
    is there any possible way.
    Please help.
    regards,
    kavitha

    Hi
    When we are creating a new user and click save, then a user is created and to that user automatically a role should get assigned (without manual assignment of role to user). the role will have the framework page etc.
    for the above one we can follow the simple process ,
    as u need 2 assign the role automatically  while creating the user it self, u have to do the following.
    In user Adminstartion we have a button called Copy To New User.
    u just slect a user already created and just click on the button above, the  new user which is going to be created will get all the credntails and roles groups ,everything as the previous one.
    Just have a try .
    Sandeep

  • In Funds Management-Assigned budget is more than the release

    Hi Experts,
    We have Funds Management active and in few cases the assigned budget is more than the released budget for a funds center and commitment item. We observed that the material consumption (stores requests) entries get posted even when there is no released budget.
    Can you suggest ways to control the posing of material consumption entries when there is no released budget in Funds management.
    With Regards
    ACR.Ruben

    hi
    Try there is a USER _EXIT for Material consulmption for the Movement type 261 GI to Production .
    Extension SAPLFMFA, component EXIT_SAPLFMFA_001
    through this you can stop the Material consumption additions to fundcenter through the commit ment item.
    Thanks & Regards
    Mala K Reddy

  • CJ31 - How to modifying the assigned budget

    Hi gurus,
    We have checked that in our system we have incorrect values in the Budget database. this is because we have posted invoices directly in FI by a batch input calling to the tcode FB01. We post this with reference to Purchase orders populating the field "purchase order". I mean, the FI invoice has the field PO document filled out with the PO number. We close the PO number manually.
    The problem is that even the invoice is with the same amount than the PO, the assigned budget in transaction CJ31 is being modified in the value for instead remaining without changes. Transaction MIRO makes a check in the PO when being posted but FB01 not. In fact in MIRO if the amount is greater than PO, the assigned value is increased.
    SAP has indicated that FB01 is not connected to the commitment system as MIRO so this is the correct behavior of system. At this point we are going to start using the standard procedure. However we need to correct the current data we assigned to the .
    Therefore we have the in budget database corrupted since they are duplicated or even more than duplicated.
    My question is how to modify the assigned budget?
    -Is there any way from a functional point of view (executing some transaction or program) to reduce the assigned budget for errors like this?
    -In case that this is not possible by t-code or program, is there any idea of tables we need to adjust? We know that the table PJPA registers the annual records and assigned values are displayed in fields WTJHR and WLJHR but we cannot modify only this table in case there are other tables linked.
    Many thanks in advance and kind regards

    Hi Varun,
    Thanks for replying. I checked the note you linked. However I didn't find a solution
    CJEN and CJBN are not an option for us. With these transaction we can rebuild the data but the wrong data is already imputed in my system. Just to clarify. My requirement is getting a way to amend the values we have in the assigned value. From the system point of view the assigned budget is correct because it was imputed from FI. But in terms of my business we are duplicating the assigned (Purchase orde an FI document). Therefore we are searching for modify the assigned value in order to represent the real budget state.
    Kind Regards

  • Replacing Overall Budget values with Assigned budget values.

    Hello Experts,
                         My planned overall  budget was 16 crore and assigned budget is 15 crore in project header comprising of some -ve available budget against some child level wbs.
      Now, against some project i used CJ30 and replaced the amount but some projects are not allowing me to do the same.
    In those projects against few child wbs budget is -ve and at parent wbs its +ve available budget.
    When I am doing replacement for this parent wbs system  is not allowing.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards,
    saurabh

    Experts,
                 Once the  budget is Distributed, is it possible to decrease the value of distributed budget.?
    i am trying but in vain..
    please help.
    thanks
    ankur

  • BAPI to assign budget to a WBS element.

    hi,
    I need to find BAPI to assign budget to a WBS element in a project.
    The transaction to do this is CJ30.
    Its imp...
    Please help..
    Thanks & Regards
    Shabari

    Look at BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
    rgd
    Frédéric
    (next time search the BAPI with transaction BAPI or in ifr.sap.com)

Maybe you are looking for