Inspection plan for inprocess inspection
Hi QM Gurus
please let me know can I use an inspection plan for inprocess inspection
Thanks
TR
Dear,
Inspection Plan is similar to routing, which will indicate what are all characteristics need to be checked / inspected when you receive a material. Is a master data. Once the inspection lot is created we will check the inspection plan and perform the inspection and give the defects recording and usage decision for the inspection lots.
So for inspection type 03 use routing with usage as 1 and status as 4 and control key as PP04 to specify the inspection characteristics.
when u cofirm that perticular operation it will ask to record the results. Inspection lot get genarated during order release this we can see in the order header data assignment tab. PP04 assignement says this operation is relevent for inprocess inspection and we need to assign MIC's for this which are relevent created in QS21 for this also sampling procedure created in QDV1.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Similar Messages
-
Is it possible to create inspection plan for "Inprocess Inspection"
Hi,
Is it possible to create inspection plans for "Inprocess Inspection".
If yes , what would be the "task List Usage".Is it "1"?
If no ,then how to map this requirment?
Regards
VemulaHi
Vemula
Generally as Per SAP std Routing is used for inspection of 03 type of inspection.
but you can also customize the Inspection task list Usage for Inprocess Inspection.
This is possible through
QCC0>Quality Inspection>Insp lot creation>Assign Insp type to origine>
here informt of 03 inspection type you can assign
Task list type:Q
Usage:either 1(Production) or 3(Universal)
save
Regards
Poonam -
Hi All,
I have an issue regarding in-process inspection. With the inspection type 03 , when process order is created immediately
inspection lot is created .In this case the system will allow me to carry out conformation after each operation results according.
i need an exit like after confirmation only , i should be able to do results recording.How to achieve this . Please let me know is it possible ti achieve through any User Exit.
Regards,
Madhu.Dear,
Inspection Plan is similar to routing, which will indicate what are all characteristics need to be checked / inspected when you receive a material. Is a master data. Once the inspection lot is created we will check the inspection plan and perform the inspection and give the defects recording and usage decision for the inspection lots.
So for inspection type 03 use routing with usage as 1 and status as 4 and control key as PP04 to specify the inspection characteristics.
when u cofirm that perticular operation it will ask to record the results. Inspection lot get genarated during order release this we can see in the order header data assignment tab. PP04 assignement says this operation is relevent for inprocess inspection and we need to assign MIC's for this which are relevent created in QS21 for this also sampling procedure created in QDV1.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
How to use Same Inspection plan for Multiple Plants?
Hello,
When I create a Process Order for material (M1), release and save it for a Plant A then I get the Inspection lot automatically.
Now I have another Plant B that we have created. We would like to use the same Inspection plan that has been created for Plant A and M1
So in the changed mode(QP02) of the Inspection plan for Plant A in the material assignment tab I added the Material M1 and the Plant B. I am assuming this means when I create the Process order for M1 in Plant B then it should use the same Inspection plan.
But when I create the Process Order for M1 for Plant B, release and save it then it does not created the Inspection lot automatically(though I can create Inspection lot manually)
Can you tell me if there is setting that will allow me to create the Inspection lot automatically on saving the Process order which should use the Inspection plan that I just assigned.
And also let me know if there is a better way to handle same Inspection Plan for same material but multiple Plants.
Thanks
SAP Fans...Dear,
For your message my understanding is that you are not getting Inspection lot created in Plant"B". Inspection lot for a material would get created based on the Inspection Setup for the material master "QM View", so compare the QM for the material in both plants and correct it for Plant "B".
Probably I feel Inspection Setup is not complete for the material in Plant "B" - Generally when extending material by copying referance, in the QM view you need to click the Inspection Setup Button, for the data to be copied...otherwise it does not copy the Inspection setup from the referance plant.
Regards,
Prasobh -
Measuring Instrument Needs to be added in inspection plan for each part
Hi
How to assign the Measuring Instrument in the quality inspection plan for all the materials.
Whether i need to assign as material assignment or as PRT.
how to use prt to assign to the operation in the quality plan (task list)
Thanks
VRAJHi,
when i try to assign the Equipment for first Inspection Characteristics.
the system thru the ERROR as,
Production resource/tool is not intended for this type of task list
Message no. CF230
Diagnosis
You want to use the production resource/tool in a task list or work order with task list type Q. However, according to usage 004 of the PRT, this task list type does not exist.
Procedure
Change the usage of the PRT in the master record or select a PRT which can be used in this task list type.
How to resolve this issue. -
Muliple inspection plan for same material and same usage
Hi,
I need to create multiple inspection plans for same material with same usage.during the inspection lot creation i need to select any one inspection plan.
In standard SAP its not possible.Any user exits available for this..
Regards,
S.P.SelvathangamDear Selvathangam Palanisamy ,
My Dear Shayamal is absolutely correct and we are corrently using this SAP facility. You can create 'N' number of inspectio plans for a material and then whenever the inspection lot will created ( Thru a process order or Manual) then you will get the Inspection Lot Status 'CRTD' (Created mode) then you have to select your Inspection Task list manually by two way...
Either go to QA02 and then select it from the list of multiple plans.
Or you can directly go from QA32 ...select your inspection lot row and directly click on the Inspection Lot icon to go directly to the inspection lot window to slect the Task list.
Further there is no need to remove the Automatic Assignment from the QM View of the Material Master as if there is only one task List then system will automatically assign the TASK LIST, if you deselect it then you have to select in every case.
Thanks -
SAP QM Default Inspection Plan for all Inspection Lots created in the Plant
Scenario: We have a Proto type plant in which Daily 15 to 20 materials are created every day. We have only one inspection plan for all the materials.
Problem: We don't want to do material assignment in the Inspection Plant header every time a new material is created
Requirement: Is there any way to default the inspection plan for all the inspection lots created in the Plant by Standard Configuration or User Exit.
Your answers will be much appreciated and rewarded.
Thanks in advance,
ThiyaguHi,
In our case Creation of Inspection lots are controlled by QM View of Material Master. Our problem is to find alternative for assignment of New Materials in the Plan header in Tcode QP02, as we have only ONE INSPECTION PLAN. So our expection is all QM Inspection Lot created in the Plant should always get assigned to the SINGLE INSPECTION PLAN, with out doing any assignment of material in the Plan.
Thanks,
Thiyagu. -
Capacity planning for inspection
Hi,
I would like to plan for capacity required to complete inspection lots at our labs. This should include inspection types for 01, 03, 04 and 08. Is there a way I can do this in SAP ? I am planning to use an enhancement and create a planned order for every inspection lot (1:1 relation). But I don't know how that will work. Does anyone have any ideas ?
ThanksHi GS,
I think that's a good question, might not have been explored much.
I think, you can try to utilize the potential of "Quality Work Center" attached to inspection operations, and activate Machine and Labor as capacity categories, use relevant formulas and try the standard Capacity planning process for PP.
For more details, please go through the links -
1. http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/manufacturing-pp/blog/2013/10/23/capacity-planning-or-scheduling-leveling-maybe-sequencing
2. Capacity planning - ERP Operations - SCN Wiki
3. Capacity Planning (PP-CRP) - SAP Library
4. http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-49431
Please do further search on this subject and work with PP consultant to use this functionality. Finally share your results once you are done
Thanks,
Arijit -
Assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500
Hi to all,
Please give me solution for make assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500.
Thanks,
NAgeshhi gang,
try to make usage decision ,kindly check in material document which you have created while making the GR, check in which storgare location you have specified and try to transfer the stock from quality to unrestricted.and also make a note on batch number also if you have activated the batch management
regards
thyagarajan -
Inspection plan for Pipelines?
Dear SAPIENTS,
Business scenario: Various pipelines located in plan and need regular inspection depending upon requirement. It can be 3 MOnth, 6 MOnth or anything. Inspection lot and result recording required.
Doubt: How can i link pipelines in system and how can i create inspection plan for them?
Regards,Dear,
If i create as a equipment than where should i enter about its functional location and installation details.
i.e the reason i am asking if create an object link for the pipeline between two equipment or functional location than how can i create lot, notification for this link?
Regards, -
Changed MIC in quality plan for new lot.....
Hi All,
I created quality plan for one material and did result recording.
Now again new lot is created for same material but this time I donu2019t want to check same MIC what I did last time.
I deleted the pervious MIC and added new MIC what I want to check. After doing that again I went to QA32 to do RR for new MIC but its showing pervious one.
So what I have to do.
Please suggest me.
Regards,
Siddharth shankerDear Siddharth,
I created quality plan for one material and did result recording.
No issue this is fine.
Now again new lot is created for same material but this time I donu2019t want to check same MIC what I did last time.
If you don't want to check same MIC's there are two options :
a) Go to insp plan delete / overwrite the MIC and save, please ensure that your lot is generated after this change is made. new plan will be applied.
b) Make a separate task list with other set of MIC's and while assigning the task list to inspection lot you can select the desired one.
I deleted the pervious MIC and added new MIC what I want to check. After doing that again I went to QA32 to do RR for new MIC but its showing pervious one.
Pl check when the lot has been generated, if it is generated before you have done the changes then lot will not show new MIC's. for that you have to go to QAC3 to reset the insp lot.
Best Regards,
Shekhar -
Result Recording for inprocess lot
Hello SAP gurus.
For in process inspection lot i have 3 operation for testing my requirment is if i goning for result recording for second operation without result recording for first operation system should restrict me. we are using 100 inspection point for inprocess inspection please suggest how can we do this?
Regards.Dear,
Goto OPK4 -Select order type /Plant - Select 'Generally valid setting' for 'Operation sequence-Select 'Error when operation sequnce is not adhered and also QM Error message if no inspection result exists.
Or you can use the exit CONFPP05 PP order conf.: Customer specific enhancements when saving .
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments
Hi All
I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
show parameter optimizer
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
**Environment**
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
TEST1 COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 3607425 167760 5/02/2013 22:11
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3658 80 5/01/2013 0:07
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 32310 496 5/01/2013 0:07
NMI 1899024 33557 18/02/2013 10:55
REGISTER 4830153 101504 18/02/2013 9:57
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1607456 19137 18/02/2013 15:48
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 5110781 78691 18/02/2013 9:56
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1425890 42468 18/02/2013 13:54
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 4133939 198570 16/02/2013 10:02
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3779 80 16/02/2013 10:55
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 33720 510 16/02/2013 10:55
NMI 1969000 33113 16/02/2013 10:58
REGISTER 5837874 120104 16/02/2013 11:05
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1788152 22325 16/02/2013 11:06
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 6101934 91088 16/02/2013 11:07
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1447589 43804 16/02/2013 11:11
TEST ITEM 2 COMPARE INDEX STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 9878 67 147 12982 869801 3553095
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7291 2747 2 639 1755977 3597916
ASSET SYS_C00102592 UNIQUE 2 12488 3733831 1 1 3726639 3733831
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C0092052 UNIQUE 1 12 3670 1 1 3590 3670
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C0092074 UNIQUE 1 104 32310 1 1 32132 32310
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6298 844853 1 2 1964769 1965029
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6701 1923072 1 1 1922831 1923084
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 106 4 26 52 211 211
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 12498 795 15 2899 2304831 4711808
REGISTER SYS_C00102653 UNIQUE 2 16942 5065660 1 1 5056855 5065660
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3667 1607968 1 1 1607689 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3811 668727 1 2 1606204 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C00102665 UNIQUE 2 5116 1529606 1 1 1528136 1529606
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C00102677 UNIQUE 2 17370 5193638 1 1 5193623 5193638
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4406 676523 1 2 1423247 1425890
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7374 676523 1 2 1458238 1461108
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00102687 UNIQUE 2 4737 1416207 1 1 1415022 1416207
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8606 121 71 16428 1987833 4162257
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8432 1780146 1 1 2048170 4162257
ASSET SYS_C00116157 UNIQUE 2 13597 4162263 1 1 4158759 4162263
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C00116570 UNIQUE 1 12 3779 1 1 3734 3779
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C00116592 UNIQUE 1 107 33720 1 1 33459 33720
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6319 683370 1 2 1970460 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6597 1971293 1 1 1970771 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 98 48 2 4 196 196
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 15615 1273 12 2109 2685924 5886582
REGISTER SYS_C00116748 UNIQUE 2 19533 5886582 1 1 5845565 5886582
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4111 1795084 1 1 1758441 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4003 674249 1 2 1787987 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C004520 UNIQUE 2 5864 1795130 1 1 1782147 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C004539 UNIQUE 2 20413 6152850 1 1 6073059 6152850
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3227 660649 1 2 1422572 1447803
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 6399 646257 1 2 1346948 1349993
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00128706 UNIQUE 2 4643 1447946 1 1 1442796 1447946
TEST ITEM 3 COMPARE PLANS
ENVIRONMENT A
Plan hash value: 4109575732
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 6 | 900 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:04 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 137 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:03 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI | 1 | 22 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | | 95137 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 109 | | 95132 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASSET | 36074 | 1021K| | 38553 (2)| 00:07:43 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 90361 | 7059K| 4040K| 56578 (2)| 00:11:19 |
|* 10 | HASH JOIN | | 52977 | 3414K| 2248K| 50654 (2)| 00:10:08 |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1782K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 1232K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 675K| 12M| | 9412 (2)| 00:01:53 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1178K| 15M| | 4262 (2)| 00:00:52 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 17 | VIEW | | 39674 | 232K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 18 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1046K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 500K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 3658 | 47554 | | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 7590 | 68310 | | 112 (2)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
ENVIRONMENT B
Plan hash value: 2826260434
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 176 | 56855 (2)| 00:11:23 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 163 | 36577 (2)| 00:07:19 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ASSET | 1 | 44 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | 9834 (2)| 00:01:59 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 87 | 9830 (2)| 00:01:58 |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 74 | 9825 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 52 | 9820 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 33 | 116 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 1 | 19 | 115 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C00116570 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 723K| 13M| 9699 (2)| 00:01:57 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI | 1 | 22 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1 | 13 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 2378K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
| 22 | VIEW | | 90889 | 443K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 23 | HASH JOIN | | 90889 | 2307K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 966K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 25 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND
"SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PMHi Paul,
I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
select * from sys.aux_stats$
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS NULL COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 1 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 1321.20523 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR NULL NULL -
Plans for Small Pull Out Keyboard?
Hi,
Are there any plans for a pull out keyboard?
Best Wishes,
Alyssa.We're just users like you but it's doubtful that Apple is going to ruin the sleek lines of the phone by adding a slide out keyboard.
-
hi, i am a littl confused as I logged into creative cloud and bough the in design plan for a year but i cant seem to donwload it... there is a window that pops up and it says its downloading but its taking forever? any advice?
Hi Dima,
Please refer to the help documents below:
Troubleshoot Creative Cloud download and install issues
Error downloading, installing, or updating Creative Cloud applications
Regards,
Sheena
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am looking for some advice on the best external setup, speed, and capacity wise, its also important to keep in mind this is for a portable setup so I do need to be able to carry it around with me. As far as I know the best option would be for me to
-
How do I install Brother MFC-5840CN scanner driver to eMac OSX?
I've done the installation but the icon doesn't exist to show that the scanner driver was installed. Plus, when I go to open it up from the CD, it asks me to choose an Application to open it. So far, nothing has worked. Do I need to uninstall it howe
-
Can't connect to SMB share after upgrade
Just upgraded to 10.9 Mavericks and can no longer connect to our SMB file share on the network. Several of us have tried connecting to it on this machine and all we get is There was a problem connecting to the server "xxxxxxx.domain.com". You do not
-
White borders introduced during export?
Aperture seems to be randomly adding whire borders to only some of my images during export. Of two nearly identical images, one has them, the other does not. Look at these examples: http://www.reesweb.com/samples/border/ These images are both portion
-
Disabling cd/dvd rom from I-Mac
Dear friends, In my office, there are around 50 nos. of mac based pcs. The systems are getting misused by the users through the external drives. I have already blocked mass storage devices. But people are using the cd/dvd rom drives and misuse of the