Integration model for planned orders ..?

Hi,
When I create PLANNED orders in R/3 , they come to APO . But when I create them in APO , I dont see them in R/3. I do not see them R/3 table AFPO.
What could be wrong? Wwhat integration models are responsible?
thanks,
Ashish

Some basic things to check first are (I quote from a 4.1 system):
Have you maintained the distribution definition (SPRO > Integration with SAP Components > Integration of SAP SCM and SAP R/3 > Basic Settings for Data Transfer > Publication > Maintain Distribution Definition)?
Do you have the "No SNP Planned orders" unchecked at SPRO > Advanced Planning and Optimization > Supply Chain Planning > Supply Network Planning (SNP) > Basic Settings > Configure Transfer to OLTP Systems?
There may be also some BAdIs involved but I'll check later.

Similar Messages

Integration model for sales orders failing repeatedly

Integration model for Sales Orders to APO is failing and in the CIF the error says "Customer requirement G BR 0082372353 900010 0000: liveCache problem, retu".
This error appears everytime you we run the integration model and it says in the Job log; ABAP/4 Processor: SYSTEM_CANCELED.
Note that this is "not" manually stopped but it still gives this error.

Hi Kailash,
Run /SAPAPO/SDRQCR21 in apo for the part contained in your delivery document, which is failing. While running the report, check the radiobutton, Build the requirements from Doc.Flow table. This will remove the inconsistencies remaining in the requirement table on R/3 side.
Try this and let us know, if you could succeed.
Regards
Sanjeev

Disabling GATP for planned orders/production orders

Hi,
We have a scenario where we need to disable ATP check for production orders happening through GATP. That is, ATP check for production order materials should happen in SAP R/3. This is a problem because we have activated ATP check in integration models for sales orders and it is happening through GATP. Production Planning is happeninig in R/3 and we dont have either PP/DS or SNP in APO. ..only GATP.
any pointers on how the ATP check for planned orders/production orders can be blocked in GATP for the same materials which are active for sales order GATP check?
Thanks.

hi Pawan /Prasun /vikas
Thanks for your helpful answers
@Pawan : Since we have recently gone live with production planning and its in the process of stabilizing we do not want to enable ATP check for production orders in GATP yet. Also since we are also using batch-determination with ATP check in production orders we still have to check how the system responds with the combination. Therefore,as of now, we dont intend to switch on ATP for production orders in GATP.
@ Prasun : I understand there would be a user exit (EXIT_SAPLATPC_001) which would help in doing GATP check based on order type/business event. However my concern is if the order does not belong to any of the order types will the system do a normal standard ATP check in APO or it will do a ATP check in R3 ? Our programmers are still looking how to tweak it but any pointers based on your experience will be helpful
Thanks

Issue with CIF Integration model for Transaction data

Hi Gurus,
I have activated the Integration model for PO & PReqs by location wise and i assumed that transaction data is online and we need not to re activate for any new Product / location combination got created in system.
But the issue is that every time a new material got created, we need to deactivate and activate the integration model for Transaction data to get the transaction data into APO.
Is there any way to avoid the following exercise as it is taking very long time for activation.
Please guide me as it is very urgent.
Thanks for help in advance...
Thanks & Regards,
Jagadeesh

I assume 1,60,000 location products are spread around different locations.
Rather than one Integration Model it is better to have multiple Integration Models.
For example: one for each region like North America, one for Europe, one for Asia (assuming you have countries spread across the world). Or create Intgeration Model by Country.
This way you reduce the number of Products in an Integration Model.
It is very important to have manageable set of Integration Models. Let me give an example - you have some problem hence the single Material Master Integration Model is down (inactive). At that time any PP or PDS transfer will not have the Header or COmponent products transferred to APO (in effect PDS/PPM cannot be transferred). If you are creating or converting Planned Orders they will not transfer to R/3 (as Header product is not part of active intgeration model).
But if you have country spefic or region specific Integration Model - only that country is affected not all.
In fact you should have other integration model (like PDS/PPM, Procurement Relationships, Planned / Production Orders, Sales Orders, Stocks) in same manner i.e. either Country(s) specific or group of countries by region. The risk of models getting inactive or taking too much time to activate after regeneration easily outweighs management of more number of Integration Models (compared to one Global integration model per object).
Hope this gives you some direction.
Somnath

Integration model for transactinoa data

Hi
what is the transaction code to reactivate integration model for the transactional data, let say example, changes in po or sales order after activating the integaration model. which transaction code we have to use reactivate. please any one help me

Hi somnath , Online Transfer of Transaction Data using BTE is activated in R/3 SPRO (should be enabled for ND-APO application)
I think above what u mentioned is cfc9 tansaction code. It is mainly meant for materila master, vendor master , customers. simply menat for master data.But for transacrtional data likoe PO's , SO will not come into picture. Right?
Please clarify me.
Online Transfer of Transaction Data using BTE is activated in R/3 SPRO (should be enabled for ND-APO application).
2) Publication settings (Distribution Definitions) maintained in APO for the locations in SPRO.
Can u tell me the path or transaction code for the above event

User exit/ badi needed for planned order create/change,collective ATP check

Dear All,
I'm looking for a user exit/ badi which can be used for planned orders at the stage of
mass collective availability check (COMAC tcode) update; or at some other relevant stages of mass update of planned orders.
I need after collective availability check to perform the following:
1) to copy date from "total comitment" field on header tab of planned order and paste it (replace old date) to order finish date on header screen
then
2) to start a scheduling.
Very appreciate your help.
Best Regards,
Andrey
Edited by: Andrey Kruglov on Apr 15, 2010 3:06 PM
Edited by: Andrey Kruglov on Apr 15, 2010 3:07 PM

Dear,
Use the BAPI : BAPI_PLANNEDORDER_CHANGE
Or use the function module MD_SET_ACTION_PLAF for Schedule planned order.
and the transaction MDAC Execute action for planned order
This function module includes the following actions:
Explode BOM
Explode BOM, check availability
Check availability, only explode BOM in the case of a requirement
Check availability, do not explode BOM
Reset availability
Change planned order data
Schedule planned order
Delete planned order
Assign the key for the respective action control to the materials in the material master (MRP 4 view).
Please refer this thread,
Re: MDVP for collective orders
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Creation of Reservation for planned order

Hi Team,
Is it possible to create reservation for planned orders after MRP run?
My opinion was the reservation can only be created with reference to production order after MRP. The reservation can not be created with reference to planne dorders after MRP run because planned orders are intermident document which will not exist in the system always. The planned order details will not be available in the system once it get converted into production order.
How the reservation will be processed which was created with reference to planned order after converting the planned order to production order?
Kindly need ur guidance.
Thanks
psk

Dear PSK,
In a typical discrete manufacturing setup production orders are the promised receipt for which reservations gets generated as
soon a production order is created.But only if the order is released goods movements can be posted against the reservation
details through MIGO/MB1A for 261 movement.
It's not required to create any reservation at the planned order level or which may not help you in any means to your business.
But however in a REM scenario MF60 is used to create stock transfer reservations for 311 movement where planned orders
are used for production backflush.To explain in detail even without any planned orders you can do a stock transfer reservation
for a production quantity.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

How to connect MAPL and PLPO to derive work center for planned order

Hi,
Anybody know how to derive work center using MAPL and PLPO for planned order (PLAF). Is there any connecting table between MAPL and PLPO.
Please help asap.
Regards,
Mitali

I guess u r trying to view the detail scheduling info (tab in MD13) for a planned order . In that case -
1. Go to PLAF and enter the planned order number. (PLAF-PLNUM) and get the ID of the capacity requirements record (PLAF-BEDID).
2. With this PLAF-BEDID go to KBED. pass the value here. KBED-BEDID. The KBED-ARBID values are your work center ID.
3. To get the work center texts ( the way is appears in the screen) - Pass this value to CRHD . CRHD-OBJTY = 'A' ( i.e Type work center) and CRHD-OBJID = KBED-ARBID.
Hope it solves ur prob.
Cheers
SKC

Extractor for Planned order

Hi Experts,
I am looking for the stabdard extractor for the Planned order, Basically I need the fields from the table PLAF.
Please let me know any standard extractor available or any extractor need to enhance.
Thanks
sai

Hi Sai,
Take a look at 2LIS_04_P_MATNR and see if it is usefull:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/88/7fc73c0c52085be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Else it seems that you should create a generic extractor directly on the table according to this thread:
Re: Extractors for Planned orders and Proces Orders
Hope this helps.
BR
Stefan

Table For Planned Order Details From PP Module

In our organisation we are taking Plan Vs Acheivement from Production. So, intialy we taken Plan details from "PLAF" Table and Acheivement details from "S225" Table. But After running MRP at month end. Previous month plan get deleted and new order create.
how to get history data for Planned order.
Please help us.
Regards
Naga

I don't think that there is any history in regard to planned orders. PLAF will get rebuilt according to your MRP parameters and I don't believe that the data is stored.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Integration Model for the resources terminates with an error

Hi
we have deleted the existing Integration model for the Resources and trying to create a newones, when iam activating the new resource integration model it is terminating with an error "Resource already exists(mapping error occured)".
we did the consistency check for the resources and ran OM17 everything seems OK. when tried to the same in the test system it works fine...
How to rectify this..

5,
Deleting integration models for master data is a poor way to start any process.
The message implies that the offending resource probably was created locally in SCM, or perhaps to support a different Business System Group. The easiest solution is to delete the resource and then recreate via Core Interface.
Best Regards,
DB49

Changing MRP controller for planned order

Hello experts,
Is there any way the planner could change the MRP controller of a planned order within MD12 ? We are using ver 4.7 and this field is not enabled. Currently the planners are creating prod orders much in advance and are looking to move to a process where they firm planned order. We are using project stock planning structure so more that one planner may create orders for the same material. So when one planner review the material planning for one project he would firm the planned order and assign it to him for leater conversion.
Note: I the config I didn't saw any field selection control for planned orders.
Thank you in advance for sharing your wisdom.
Francois Paquet BPA
aeronautive industrie

Francois,
Very interesting question. However I never had to change those fields in either planned or prodcution orders.
Both orders master data fileds are disabled.
However since your are working with project orders ( or netwrok orders ) system would be giving you specific planner order hard tied to the project order ( similar to Made to order scenario).
Planner could use MD51 ( project planning ) & MD4C ( option for Netwrok or WBS element ) for monitoring progress of his /her order.
This way planners do not have to go by MRP controller data.
Hope this provides some new thoughts.
Thanks,
Ram

Release status for planned order

Hi All
I am running MRP weekly,system is generating the Planned order once MRP is completed.Here my requirement is i want release status for planned order, at the same time once planned order is released i dont want user to change any data in planned order.
Somebody explain me about the settings of action control of planned order.
Regards
Srinivasan.P

Hi,
Sorry to say but there is nothing like system status for Planned orders.
Check below thread,
[Release of Plan orders|Planned Order Release]
Regards,
Dhaval

Scheduling for planned order

When I choose leadtime scheduling in MRP RUN then system does forward scheduling always.
Then in planned order change mode when i do manually do scheduling then it does backward scheduling as per settings in OPU5.
How to get backward scheduling in MRP.??

Dear,
MRP do the backwordscheduling but The system always determines the basic dates for planned orders using backward scheduling.
The system automatically switches to forward scheduling if the determined start date lies in the past.For this you have to maintain 2 settings.
1)In OPPQ - Plant parameters maintain the indicator for start date in the past allow. 2) In OPU3 for your plant & order type , maintain the no. of days for start date in the past.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

ATP Rule for Planned Orders

Hi Experts,
I have configured the ATP rule for Planned Orders. So I only want to check the component stock and Production Orders when running ATP check for the Parent Material.
In OPJJ, I only selected the following options.
Include Safety Stock : Ticked
Check without RLT : Ticked
Incl.production orders : X (Take all production Orders into account)
No other options or boxes have been selected
Also I have included the relevant Checking group in MRP 3 for the Parent Material (Checking Rule has been assigned to that Checking Group in Config) and also maintain the Plant Parameters for MRP (assign the checking rule to the plant)
So, For an example :
Parent : A
Components : B and C
Parent Material A has only 5 Planned Orders starting on same day 20.05.2014 each qty 5
Components B got stock 300
Components C got stock 1
When I ran ATP Check for the Parent material A using COHV, qty 1 has been allocated to all the planned orders as committed. Why is this happening ?
I also checked in CO09 for the Component Material C, and it says ATP Qty is only 1. I expected the system would allocate that stock 1 to one of the Orders but it seems to be not working as I expect.
Any explanations will be much appreciated and will not hesitate to avoid the points.
Kind regards,
Ishara

Hi DB49,
Appreciate your reply. Please see the following comments.
Right now I have been assuming that you have performed an availability check manually for one of the planned orders, and you got the same results (overconfirmation). Please confirm.
Yeah I have performed for one order and it gave me the same result. Also, when I perform for the 2nd Order, it allocates the quantity.
OK, basic things you should already have checked:
You have maintained the checking rule for planned orders (OPPQ or OPPR)
You have maintained the ATP group for the materials (OVZ2)
You have assigned the ATP group to the Material Master of the components (MM02)
You have maintained the scope of check according to the rules you mentioned earlier (OPPJ).
You have no planning strategy in the component material that would have invoked a special ATP.
I checked everything apart from point 2 (OVZ2). I have maintained that via MRP Group and that MRP Group has been linked to Master Data (MRP 3)
Really appreciate your support in this.
Kind regards,
Ishara

Integration model for planned orders ..?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for