Intercompany STO with billing through a third plant

Hi
I have the following scenario:
Stock transfer happens between 2 plants in 2 different company codes and billing happens through a third Plant which is in a 3rd company code.
The supplying plant delivers the goods to the destination Plant and bills the billing plant. The billing plant in turn adds it's margin and bills the destination Plant. Destination Plant pays the billing plant. Hence the following documents are required at a minimum:
1. STO between Supplying plant and destination plant with the price to be paid by the destination plant. Invoice presented by will be the 3rd plant
2. Supplying plant creates the delivery and the transfer price in the delivery will be the price to be paid by the billing plant to the supplying plant
3. Supplying plant creates the billing document on the billing plant
4. Billing plant should be able to pay through an A/P invoice i.e. thru MIRO
5. Billing plant should in turn be able to create billing to the destination plant
6. Destination plant should pay the billing plant through MIRO.
Can anyone pls explain how this entire process is possible in standard SAP

hi,
kindly go thru the below mantioned thread,this will help you
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1326481
regards
sumit simran

Similar Messages

Third party+ intercompany STO with billing ???????

Hi Experts.
Would like to take ur inputs.
My Client has 2 Company Codes 1000 and 2000
The 1000 Company code has 2 Distribution Centres- A001, A002.
And Company Code 2000 has 2 Sites-B001, B002.
My Client 1000 Company Code procures on Behalf of 2000 Company Code and sales the Material on a Specific Margin from 1000 Company code to 2000 Company Code.
Site B001( Company Code 2000 ) will raise P.O to Distribution Center A001 ( Company Code 1000 ) and then Distribution Centre A001 ( Company Code 1000 ) will raise P.O to the External Vendor.
a) How Can we inter-Link the respective transactions between Site B001 to Distribution Centre A001 and from Distribution Centre A001 to External Vendor ?
b) Is it Possible to Farward the raised P.O from Site B001 to Distribution Centre A001 to External Vendor ?
Please advice your valuable input on this.
Thanks in advance
Best Regards

Hanumant Nimbalkar,
1. a) How Can we inter-Link the respective transactions between Plant B001 to A001
Plant B001( Company Code 2000 ) will raise P.O to Plant A001 ( Company Code 1000 )
We use the Inter Company stock Transfer with Billing
Partis involved:
1. End Customer
2. Supplying Plant
3. Receiving plant
2. from A001 to External Vendor
Plant A001 ( Company Code 1000 ) will raise P.O to the External Vendor.
We use Third Party process
Process.
1. First Company code 2000 - Plant B001 will raise a P.O to Company Code 1000 - Plant A001
2. The Company code 1000 Receives the PO and Finds it has not stock within its plant
3. The company code 1000 will raise a new PO with reference to PO sent by Company code 2000 to its vendor.
4. The Company code 1000 asks the vendor to deposit the material in their plant site.(by providing plant A001 Address)
5. The Vendor will raise an invoice to the Company code 1000
6. Now From the company code 1000, from plant A001 STO will be performed keeping receiving plant as 2000
7. An Intercompany invoice will be raised by plant 1000 to plant 2000
8. The Plant 2000 after the receipt of the material / invoice will pay to Company code 1000
9. The Company code 1000 in return will settle the vendor invoice.
Regards
Sathya

Plant to Plant STO with billing

Dear Guru's
I am facing a Problem in Plant to plant STO with Billing.As my both plants are Excisable, I have done a copy control between NL and JEX now in Jex proforma invoice i am giving the value for the material and the excise duties. when i go to J1iin the value of Excise is not flowing. I have maintained the delivery type to billing type in Tax on goods movement also.
Kindly guide me.
regards,
Sudhir

hi,
after gone through your problem i realised you are asking excise invoice during intra-comp. billing.
Dear- if you are using UB doc in P.O then no need to mantain actual comercial invoice only req is proforma invoice. You know proforma invoice is not related to accounting if it isnot related how you can generate excise invoice.
If your invoice is related to acconting definitely you can raise a commercial invoice as well as excise invoice . So for this just you check after creation of billing check whether a/c doc. generated or not .
thanks
sunil

Intercompany STO with billing_pricing procedure

Hi Experts,
Need opinion
The scenario is Intercompany STO with billing in IS-Retail
here Client need Basic price plus discount
so which Standard pricing procedure available in IS-retail
and what are the condition type should involve in that pricing procedure to map above scenario
thanks in advance

Hi Hanumant,
Standard pricing procedure is RM2000 and condition type are P101,FRB1,FRC1 and GRWR.
Regards
Mohanavel

Intercompany STO with Delivery & Billing- Return STO

Hi Everyone,
Currently I am doing Intercompany STO with Delivery and Billing, which is working perfetly fine.
We create 1 Purchase order for 1,00000 LB and it will be finish after 6 months ( we provide schedule to supplying plant weekly for next 6 month, how much they have to ship ) Some times we received less quantity from supplying plant lets say weekly they have to sent 100 LB but they sent only 85 LB in last week of month and I have to close the sales.
In this can I use Return STO process ? I dont want to adjust quanity in next shipment because I have to close sales.
Some times at the time of GR we found that they have send 85 qty and sometimes we finished GR and Invoice then we get to know later that qty was less.
Return process
- Create return PO with Returns check in PO (NB)
- Create delivery , Vl10B
- PGI
- Credit memo
is this right process?
Thanks
Shree

Slight change in your return process.
Your Return process.
Return process
- Create return PO with Returns check in PO (NB)
- Create delivery , Vl10B
- PGI
- Credit memo
Correct process :
- Create return PO with Returns check in PO (NB)
-GR with 161 MVT type
- Create delivery , Vl10B
- PGI
- Credit memo
Returns :
Case 1 - At the time of GR
Case 2 - GR and Invoice both done
You can follow same process to the both scenarios as you are creating new PO for returns.

For STO with billing how to take material in plant stock without cancelling excise duty

Hi,
Please suggest for STO with billing how to take material back in plant stock without cancelling excise duty.
Scenario is
Material transffered from manufacturing plant to depot,material is in transit now, but due to some reason material calls back to manufacturing plant.
Since the excise invoice is raised and material move out of factory client can not cancel excise invoice from legal point of view & client has to pay excise duty for the material movement.
Please suggest how to take back goods to manufacturing plant without cancelling excise invoice.
We have suggested client as there is no provision to take back goods to manufacturing plant without cancelling excise invoice
and to take back material to manufacturing plant stock they have to cancel excise invoice and other related documents.
But client is asking for another options.So requesting you to please suggest any alternative ways for same.
Thanks,
Amit

client can not cancel excise invoice from legal point of view & client has to pay excise duty for the material movement
I don't think, there is a statutory rule which says, manufacturer should not cancel the excise invoice generated on their Depot plant. Justification can very well be given to Excise authorities and hence, ask your client to follow the normal process by treating this as Depot returns.
G. Lakshmipathi

Intra Company STO with Billing

Hello,
Let me explain the Basic requirement from our client.
One Company code has 15 plants.
Material are being transferred across plants
We record revenue or expenditure to the respective plant when transfer.
As I had inquired and surfed in many threads,we couldnt get the better solution as everyone suggesting to create separate plant as company code and do STO Inter company for getting the billing.
But we required intra company STO with Billing.
Any advice would be appreciated
with regards,
Vignesh

Hi,
Expenditure occur for transferring material between two plants, can be capture in a condition type and then do invoice for transferring value
Refer a discussion to capture transferring amount in STO
Freight Expenses for Transportation to Depot Plant
Regards,
Biju K

STO with scheduling agreement, between different plants, different co.codes

Hi All,
For STO with scheduling agreement, between different plants under different company codes, please let me know the configuration and order flow process
Regards,
kumar

Hi,
When you create a stock transport scheduling agreement, you can schedule the exact delivery dates for a stock transfer. Proceed as follows:
From the Purchasing menu, choose Outline agreement -> Scheduling agreement -> Create trnspt sch.agm. ME37
Fill out the initial screen. In the field Supplying plant enter the plant issuing the material. The agreement type LU is defined in the standard system. The item category must be U.
When you press ENTER, the details screen for the header data is displayed.
Enter the validity period and check the other entries on this screen, if necessary.
Enter the individual items in the item overview screen. Enter a receiving plant for each item in the Plant field.
Save the scheduling agreement.
Enter delivery schedules for the scheduling agreement with the function Outline agreement ->Scheduling agreement -> Follow-on functions -> Delivery schedule.
For configurations
Go into SPRO
Menu path is
IMG -> MM -> Purchasing -> Scheduling agreement -> Set up stock transfer scheduling agreement
A) Define shipping data for plants
B) Create and define checking rule
C) Assign delivery type and checking rule
D) Assign Document type
Hope it helps.

Cross Company STO w/billing through 3rd Company Code

We have the following situation with our Plants and Company Codes:
   1)     Company Code 1, Plant 1 (Manufacturing and Distribution), US
   2)     Company Code 2, Plant 2 (Manufacturing), Asia
   3)     Company Code 3, Plant 3 (Distribution), Europe
We are implementing functionality to move product directly from our Manufacturing Plants to our new DC. Product can be directly shipped from Plant 2 to Plant 3, but the invoice must flow through Company Code 1 due to legal reasons. This is only an invoicing requirement as they are not required to ever u201Cownu201D the stock (no transfer of ownership).
The solution being proposed right now utilizes 2 Cross-Company STOs (both with Delivery and Invoicing - NB and NLCC). This would involve creating an STO that would move product from Plant 2 to Plant 1 (invoicing between CCode2 and CCcode1), and then a 2nd STO (Cross Company) moving Product from Plant 1 to Plant 3 (invoicing between CCode1 and CCode3). However, the product would never physically arrive in Company Code 1/Plant 1. This is a "virtual" movement to meeting the invoicing requirements. I see this option as complicated logistically and probably requiring customization to keep the documents in sync and provide visibility to their relationship with each other.
I have spent a lot of time researching the forums, Wiki, etc. to see if there is an SAP Standard/Best Practice for the process of moving the Product (once produced) directly to the DC but invoicing via another (3rd) Company Code. It seems that many manufacturing companies must face this same situation. I just want to be sure forcing another complication in the Supply Chain is the best way to meet the financial requirements or if there might be a better option out there that others have implemented. Our goal is to simplify and optimize the Supply Chain, so it seems it just should be easier to meet this financial requirement than forcing Goods Movements in and out of a Plant and creating additional documents.
Does anyone have experience with this situation (Product sent directly between 2 entities, but billed through a 3rd entity) that they could comment on what is considered u201CBest Practiceu201D for this?

Hi,
I want to share one idea that during STO between company code 2&3, you need to createvendor master record in 3 company code. During creation of venor master create invoicing party (IP) as company code 1. Then invoice will be paid to company code 1.
Another solution is third party scenario. Any way this is intercompany STO, SOME WHAT RESEMBLES EXTERNAL PROCUREMENT INTERMS OF PAYMENT. Why can't you go for third party scenario. In this treat the company code 3 as customer and company code 2 as supplier of the material. Company code is the actual vendor, but orders the msterial from company code2. Company code2 directly delivers the materail to 3 and in company code 1 can do invoice. If required logical MIGO can br done. Hope it helps you. Thanking you.

Intercompany STO with consignment processing

Has anyone faced this situation? I have a client who would like to use consignment processing for VMI orders but as the goods do not get stored at the sales organzation/plant/company code that owns the order - they need to procure the goods from another company code? This is almost a mixture of the Intercompany sales process and VMI processing in ECC... Thoughts?
Example:
Company, plant A / Customer 999999999 / Part A - Stock "0"
Company, plant B / Part A - Stock "1000 pieces"
Preferred Sequence:
1. Create the VMI fill-up order KB for customer 999999999 (delivering plant is B, but the sales order belongs to sales org "A")
2. Create the delivery for the VMI fill-up order from plant b
3. Post goods issue for delivery from plant b
4. Create an IC billing document IV between company code B and A (for the goods that have shipped to the customer's consignment location for company A)
5. In MMBE see that the goods are consigned to customer 999999999 for plant A and NOT plant B. Currently, it is not treating the delivery as an intercompany order (as it is consignment and still owned by the other organization). The stock shows under consignment at plant B.
We are trying to decrease the steps from standard processing which would be the following:
1. Create the VMI fill-up order KB for customer 999999999 (delivering plant is B, but the sales order belongs to sales org "A")
2. Create the delivery for the VMI fill-up order from plant b
3. Create an IC STO from Company B to Company A
4. Create a delivery to move the goods from B to company A.
5. Create and IC billing document
6. Post GR for the goods when they arrive in company A.
7. PGI the delivery for the delivery from step 2 to move the goods into consignment.
8. In MMBE see that the goods are consigned to customer 999999999 for plant A

Hi Manoj,
Please confirm the following for your set-up
I have configured same consignment process for our client.
the process flow like this
--> Fillup order
-->Fillup delivery
-->STO (Purchase order) (through batch job) ***DID YOU RUN MRP AT THE RECEIVING PLANT TO CREATE THE IC STO? WHAT MASTER DATA SET-UP/CONFIG DID YOU PUT INTO PLACE? FOR CONFIG, I AM ASSUMING THE STANDARD IC STO CONFIG IN THE MM/PURCHASING/IC STO SECTION...
--> replanishment delivery (through batch job)
PGI of rep delivery
--Intercompany invoice if intercompany sales.
-->MIGO****SOUNDS LIKE THIS WAS STILL A TWO STEP PROCESS TO MOVE THE GOODS INTO THE RECEIVING PLANT WITH A GR USING MIGO AND THEN THE FOLLOWING STEP YOU MENTION BELOW TO MOVE THE STOCK TO THE CUSTOMER'S CONSIGNMENT LOCATION. IS THAT CORRECT?
--MB1B with movement type 631 (through batch job)****HOW DID YOU CREATE THE BATCH JOB TO POST THE MOVEMENT? THIS IS USUALLY A TRANSACTION RUN MANUALLY (UNLESS YOU HAVE CREATED AN INTERFACE THAT HAS THE INFORMATION TO POST)...

INTER company STO with Billing

I want to setup STO for inter company with billing. Meanings, Plant A belongs to company code 1000 and plant B belongs to company code 2000.
Should I be using document type NB or UD?
What delivery type should I be using under Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule?
I have tried with doc type UD with delivery type NLCC (it doesnu2019t work)
I have tried with doc type NB with delivery type NLCC (it works fine)
If I have to use doc type NB, can I just use ZNB or some customer doc type for this? Because, I need to have different number rage then standard SAP NB number range. So, I can separate number range by PO and STO. Please adviseu2026..

Hi
Should I be using document type NB or UD?
Use NB
What delivery type should I be using under Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule?
Delivry tyep NLCC AAND Cheking rule B
If I have to use doc type NB, can I just use ZNB or some customer doc type for this? Because, I need to have different number rage then standard SAP NB number range. So, I can separate number range by PO and STO. Please adviseu2026..
you can use ZNB some customer doc type also
If need
steps
To set up Intercomopany process you need to do following config,
1. Go to SPRO --- MM --- Purchasing -
Purchase order -
Set up Stock Transport order
2. Firest step is to define shipping data for plants, here you have set rthe data for both the plants who are doing transaction.
For eg. XYZ1 as supplying plant & ABC1 as receiving plant are the two plants from company code XYZ & ABC respectively
Set data for plant XYZ1 as give the value of sales organization for eg for XYZ company sales organization XYZS will be responsible & other data as distribution channel & division.
Se the data same way for plant XYZ1 also with sales area of company code XYZ.
3. Second step is to assign delivery type to supplying plant & document type that should be NLCC and as per our example it is to supplying plant XYZ1 & doc type NB.
4. Next step is optional whether you want to use one step procedure or two step procedure.
5. You need to set up master data alaso such as XYZ1 to be set up as vendor in company code ABC,.
6. You need to set up receiving plant ABC1 as customer in company code XYZ.
With this minimum requirement you can set up Intercompany process with delivery.
Process will be as follow,
1.Create Intercompany Purchase order with vendor as XYZ1 & plant as ABC1 from receiving plant.
2.Process Outbound deleivery with VL10D
3. Post Goods Issue from supplying plant.
4. Post Good receipt in receiving plant.
5. Post billing invoice VF01 from supplying company code XYZ w.r.t delivery.
6.Post Invoice receipt in receing company code.
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Intercompany STO with inbound delivery with freight....Urgent

Hi,
I have following scenario to map.
There are 2 company codes A & B and a shipment of goods is to be transferred from A to B.
I wish to use Intercompany STO process with UB.
However, A & B are geographycally separated so there involves transportation costs which will be beared by B.
How can I have the pricing procedure if I wish to have one in STO ?
If I create some freight conditions then I can add the values but I will not able to know the exact freight charges till B receives the shipment and the invoice for the same.
In this case how can I use pricing procedure ?
If I do not enter any freight charges in PO then how can I add them before I do the GR in B as this is requirement to add freight costs on material at the time of goods receipt so to arrive at exact landed cost for that material in B.
Once I wish to transfer the goods from A to B, I will do delivery so that stock gets reduced from A otherwise if I wait till the stock is physically transferred to B and then B changing the PO and add freight and subsequently doing picking, PGI and GR ,it will not correctly reflect stock positions in A.
What is the better way I can map this process.
If I wish to use inbound delivery before receiving the goods in B can I add conditions in Inbound delivery ? If so how it can be done ?
So my intended procedure will look as
Intercompany STO-UB
Outbound Delivery
Picking/PGI
Inbound Delivery with freight
GR
Please suggest as this is very critical and important requirement
Thanks in advance
regards,
manOO

Hi,
Thanks for the feedback.I wished to use NB but I don't want to go with the regular NB and subsequent billing cycle.
I want to use UB.
Anyways, is there any way by which I can have freight cnditions added at the time of Delivery.Be it Outbound or Inbound.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
manOO

Intercompany STO with CIN

Dear Gurus,
I am facing a genuine problem, am not sure whether you have faced the same problem in your company.
we are running on a global system, by taking this advantage our India company will use intercompany STO for importing the goods into their Mfg plant and warehouse(depot) with supplying plant as the plant from other county.
There is no problem with excise capturing(J1IEX) for the GR done in Mfg plant.
But i am facing problem with excise capturing (J1IG) for the GR done in warehouse (Depot). I found in program SAPMJ1IG there is a check for CIN customizing (J_1IWRKCUS) of sending plant as well. As our vendor is a plant from other county there will not be any CIN customizing for that plant, is there any solution for this scenario, pls advice.
Hoping for a early reply...
Thanks in advance.
SUN

Dear Niti,
Thank you for your reply, i thought about your solution but it is more risky and easy to commit mistake because of the assesable value change frequently.
I am thinking of raising OSS note as it doesnt make sense for J1IG program to check for CIN customizing always??? with out having a check on whether the supplying plant is with in India or not. I belive it should be simple check by validating the supplying plant LAND1 that SAP can implement in J1IG program.
I am thinking to wait for some more days before raising OSS for any realistic solutions for this issue.
Thanks in advance.
SUN

STO WITH BILLING

Hi All,
I want to know the S.T.O(Intra company) billing, not profarma invoice.It should hit the G/Ls.( I am not asking about the Inter company plz). When I am doing the invoice with respect to the delivery no(VL02N) system is giving an error message i.e Delivery type NL cannot be invoiced with Billing type F2. Then I have copied the F2(billing type) and created a new billing type(ZF2). Then I did the copy contols settings for the same from( NL- F8 to NL - ZF2. Then while doing the billing I have selected
this billing type.System is showing an error as" This document is not relavant for billing.Thoug I have changed the copy control settings as per the LF - F2. How to this process plz help me.
Thanx&Regards,
Ram

Point 1: If the invoice should hit the G/L account the document category for the invoice type that you should select be " Invoice M".
Point 2: System is proposin the default billing type F2 because the order that you mention in the delivery type as "DL". In the order DL the default billing type as F2 as with reference to the Delivery document.
Point 3: The Item category that the system triggers should also be set as" Billing Relevence"
Please try the above procedure and revert.

STO with 2 vendors for one plant

Hello!
We are facing problems with stock transfer using transport order (STO). We want to use 2 different vendors for the same plant (MK02 > Purchasing Data > Extras > Add.purchasing data). Some countries in our company should purchase from vendor X and others from vendor Y (X and Y is the same plant). The vendors have different settings.
Our problem is that SAP allows only one plant as vendor (table T001W-LIFNR). When we try to create a source list (ME01) for the vendor not in T001W-LIFNR we get the error message:
Vendor X and supplying plant PPPP incompatible
Message no. 06732
Diagnosis
You have entered vendor X and supplying plant PPPP in the source list. However, a different supplying plant has been assigned to vendor X in the master record.
Procedure
Enter either the vendor or the desired supplying plant.
Is works fine with the other vendor (the one defined for plant as vendor).
Has anybody an idea how we can solve this issue?
Thanks in advance and best regards
Reinhard

Reinhard,
I think you may be confusing the purpose of a stock transport order.
The vendor assigned to the supplying plant is just another way to represent that plant. Since there is only one plant, there can ONLY be one vendor. In effect, plant = vendor. One plant in your organization is 'buying' product from another plant in your organization. One plant represents the 'customer', and one plant represents the 'vendor'.
The vendor in the STO is totally unrelated to the vendor from which you originally bought the product.
Can you describe the business requirement which makes you think you need more than one vendor per supplying plant?
Rgds,
DB49

Intercompany STO with billing through a third plant

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for