Internal Order not allowed for revenue posting

Hello all,
I have a problem, while doing migo for subcontracting materials(movement type 105) following error has occurred:
Message no. KO014:Order 5000012 cannot carry revenues
Steps i have followed:
Step-1: In transaction MB1B materials are transferred to stock with subcontractor with movement type -541(Transfer posting to stock with subcontractor from unrestricted.-use stock) and with reference to scheduling agreement number. (A material document is generated).
Step-2: Creation of Subcontracting Challan through T-code-J1IF01 with reference to material document generated in step-1 above.
Step-3:  Goods receipt through T-Code-MIGO with movement type 103(Goods receipt for purchase order into GR blocked stock) with reference to scheduling agreement number mentioned above. (A material document number is generated)
Step-4: Release of GR blocked through T-Code-MIGO with movement type 105(GR from blocked stock) and with reference to material document generated in step-3 above.
When the material document is checked, system does not give any error but at the time of posting the same system displays the following message:
Order 5000012 cannot carry revenues
The above order is an internal order and is assigned to Stock Change Account (a primary cost element) in OKB9 (Default account assignment).

Hi
Go to T.code KO02 and check in the Control data tab if your Internal Order is blocked for Revenue Posting or not.
Regards
Hari

Similar Messages

  • Goods receipt  for purchase order not allowed for a particular wbs

    hello everybody..
    Am creating a good receipt for a purchase order using the T-CODE-: MIGO...
    While doing so am getting an error as " goods receipt  for purchase order not allowed(wbs element)".
    What can be done to rectify this error?
    Plz do help me....
    Regards,
    Deepika
    Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please have a look in the appropriate functional forum, study the long text of this error message.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Dec 1, 2010 5:52 PM

    Hi Br. Ajay M,
    Released the order and Status line as follow
    REL  AVAC BUDG GMPS
    but the error changed while reverse the document
    item 0001 Order is invalid.
    Many thanks for your kindly reply.
    regards,
    Steven

  • Internal Order not allowing to decrease budget amount

    Dear Experts
    We have to close Internal Order no. 800001526 but system is not allowing to decrease budget amount from Rs. 2606000
    Regards
    Ajeesh

    Hi Ajeesh,
    I happen to go with Manikumar, because in the recent post we see either actuals/commitments Zero only, but when we see at your first screen, there we see total value (either actual/commitment) as 5212000, which is double of your budget i.e. 2606000, that's why there it is giving negative budget value of -2606000 (i.e. 2606000-5212000) which implies your budget has exhausted.
    So when you post with 5212000, system hasn't stop you as you might have not had availability control or had tolerance limit for more than 200%.
    Please if at all it is testing server, why don't you create one more order and check?
    Regards...
    Jose

  • Purchase and release order not allowed for TECO work orders

    Hi
    We are typically setting maintenance work orders to TECO once the physical work as been performed as that sets the reference date for showing the history of when the maintenance was performed, and when the maintenance call was completed. However, we have invoices that may come in significantly later than when the  physical work was performed.
    Once the order is in TECO a purchase or release order (for services against a contract) cannot be created for the work order. Additionally it appears that even if we have a release order,or purchase order, if it is not for the exact amount of the invoice the release or purchase order cannot be ammended - we get the sameerror mssage (BS007) as when creating a new purchase order for the TECO order.
    I had wondered about using BS22 to change TECO to continue to allow purchase  and release orders when the order is in TECO status.
    Any input on pros/cons or other approachs appreciated.
    Philip

    Thanks
    That was what I initially thought. However I was informed that if the invoice is not for the originally determined amount that to post the invoice means having to change the PO, and changing the PO appears to hit the same business transaction as creating a PO, and so we get the error mssage.
    The issue is that we may know we need to have services estimated at, say, $5.000. But we do not know what the actual final invoice will be. So the actual amount may end up being $4,500 or $5,500 as an example, and it may come ni late from the vendor. The Purchse Order side is not my expertize, but I am being informed that the invoice must match the PO amount, otherwise the PO must be ammended to match. As the order is in TECO, the user cannot amend the PO.
    I would be happy to know of other options, or at least good questions to ask. I want the end user to be able to post the invoice against the PO, after the order is in TECO, even it the invoice amount is not exactly the same as what was originally anticipated.
    regards
    Philip

  • Blogs Taskflow not Allowing for New Post

    I have added the Blogs Taskflow to a page within a custom WebCenter Portal implementation. I have associated this Blogs Taskflow with an existing WebCenter Content folder using a WebCenter Content connection with Identity Propagation. I have made sure to set the correct security on both the page and taskflow resource within the jazn-data.xml file so that all the users should be able to fully use the taskflow.
    However, when the taskflow shows up on the page, it shows the folder name, but not a link to create a New Post and I want all Blog functionality to be performed through the Taskflow.
    Any ideas?
    Brian

    OK, I will say this again. This is a Custom WebCenter Portal implementation, which means that everything was done through JDeveloper and I have already followed all of the instructions that are listed in the documentation for creating a page and populating it with a Blogs taskflow that is tied to a WebCenter Content folder. However, this is not working the way that it is supposed to.

  • FI  posting not allowed for WBS Element

    Hi All,
    While doing down payment billing I'm getting error that FI posting is not allowed for WBS element. But FI periods are open for all months in 2008.
    Please suggest how to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Harish

    Hello
    Account assignment
    If you want to post actual costs and commitments to a WBS element, you have to indicate that the WBS element is an account assignment element in the WBS. All objects that can be assigned costs and commitments within a project (for example, orders, networks, or purchase orders) can only be assigned to a WBS element if you have set the account assignment indicator for the element.
    In Customizing for the Project System, you can set an indicator to specify that costs are planned for all WBS elements or only for specific WBS elements.
    Billing
    If you want to post revenues to a WBS element, you have to indicate that the WBS element is a billing element in the WBS.
    Reg
    assign points if useful

  • Posting in foreign currency not allowed for external tax system

    Hello all,
    I created a purchase order for inter-company stock transfer. Then created a corresponding outbound delivery and goods issue using  VL10h and completed goods issue. Then I completed good receipt using MIGO. When I was trying to create a sales order I got this message "Posting in foreign currency not allowed for external tax system". What could be the reasons for this message.  The message number said FS885.
    One final note. I am able to create Billing document with manual batch number input in Delivery document item. But when I am using Batch split I am not able to generate invoice. Can anyone tell me what could be the problem here.

    Hi Samir,
    The Goods Received NI (Allocation Cost Account) need to be balaned in Local and System Currency as this is a Multi Currency account and these are the currencies that Business One will offer reports in.
    The Foreign Currency for this account is irrelevant as you can never get a balance in FC for a multi currency account, neither will you find any reports for this. 
    If the client insists you can create a manual Journal entry in FC only to correct this. Business One does not offer any functionality to correct the Foreign Currency in this scenario. (like Exchange Rate difference for Local Currency and Conversion Differences for System Currency)
    To do the manual JE open the form settings and the tab 'table', here untick the box 'From FC Field'. This will enable you to create a FC JE only.
    Hope it clarifies the issue.
    Jesper

  • Que-''actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .''

    hi ,
    During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e  "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
    Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
    pls help me to solve this problem.
    AMOL WAGH
    Edited by: amol  wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:09 PM
    Edited by: amol  wagh on Dec 6, 2008 8:10 PM

    Dear,
    For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
    After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
    Please give the feed back.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Actual activity allocation is not allowed for order .

    hi ,
    During confirmation of operation at co11n (also at co11), got one error massage i.e "actual activity allocation is not allowed for order "
    Due to this error confirmation is not possible .
    pls help me to solve this problem.
    AMOL WAGH

    Dear,
    What is message number? Did you assign the usersttus in BS02?
    For allocation activity costs, we need to define activity type in KL01 by specifying the unit of measurement of the particular activity type (like  machine - Hours etc.). While creating activity type, we will assign a secondary cost element (with category 43) in the activity type through which the activity cost will flow.
    After that we will plan for cost center in KP06 (cost elementwise). Then we will plan machine hours in KP26 where we will link the activity type to a particular cost center.
    When we do price calculation in KSPI, system checks the planned costs for cost center (in KP06) and also checks the machine hours planned (in KP26) and gives the cost for the particular activity type.
    Please check the above in the system
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • With out goods issue for order system should not allow for order confirmati

    Dear all
    with out goods issue system should not allow for order/operation confirmation.
    how it is possible.
    Regrads
    Srinivas

    Dear ,
    In some cases we required to do confirmation or TECO without GI .
    We can change it as per req using user exit
    Regards,
    Ishwar

  • Internal Order not required

    Dear All,
    Here I am doing F-02 transaction there i am giving Cost center, Profit center and Business area and Internal order is not required, But system is giving message like "Please enter Correct Internal Order".
    I checked in OBC4 and OB41, there Order is in Optional.
    Here my exact requirement is without entering internal order the entry should be posted. The system should not ask the above message.
    Can you please guide me how to fix this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramesh Reddy

    Dear Ramesh,
    Please check whether you have validation or substitution for this TCode.

  • Internal order not coming into PR

    Dear SAP gurus,
    We have a scenario where asset is bought using a budget in internal order. We have set the internal order as statistic only, and we have assigned the IO to the asset number. Then we input the asset number in the PR, we expect that the internal number should follow as well. But it is not, thus only asset inputted there. This is not acceptable as if this is the case, then this PR would not consume the budget in the internal order.
    I know for sure that SAP should be able to derive the internal order as I have seen this done in my previous project. Can anyone of you share what need to be done to make sure that the IO follows as well?
    Best regards,
    John

    Hi John,
    Please check the following points:-
    Asset recon account is made as a statistical cost element or not.
    In the asset recon account, check if the field status group allows Internal order field as optional.
    The internal order is assigned as investment order in the origin tab of Asset master data.
    The Internal order master data is categorized as "Investment" in the object class.
    Check configuration settings in transaction code "ACSET", whether EAUFN- Investment Order is allowed for all transactions.
    BR, Kavita

  • Internal Order not being created in cProjects-Accounting Integration

    Dear All,
    We are working on cProjects 4.0 with ECC 6.0,
    Trying to do Accounting Integration.
    For only one Project I am able to create Internal Order,
    But I am getting following error.
    “Cost/revenue rate YP002 is not valid in organization 00000000   “
    Inspite of assigning these rates to the organization 00000000
    For other projects, when I click on accounting:
    I get following error
    "Single-Obj.Controlling on InternalOrders 0188993B3E343947A046B554FD886E03 000006000032 does not exist"          
    When I go to Controlling Cockpit, I see this Internal Order not being created.
    Have revisited all settings, project type, etc.
    How do I go about this.
    Kindly help,
    Navendu

    Dear All,
    I was able to solve the one of the problem, with the following settings,
    Assign Cost Elements & Activity Types:
    Choose Organization, Start & End Dates, Cost and Revenue Elements, Currency.
    The start and end date of the cost/ revenue did not fall within the start and end date of the Organization.
    Regards,
    Navendu Shirali

  • "Access not allowed for subject: principals=[]" Common Issue with no Repose

    Hi all,
    When upgrading from 8.1 to 8.1 SP4 (we have seen the issue as early as SP2), there is an exception thrown when trying to start the server where our application is deployed:
    <pre>weblogic.management.NoAccessRuntimeException: Access not allowed for subject: principals=[], on ResourceType: Application Action: write, Target: Deployed
    </pre>
    Our application creates an InitialContext using properties from a standard properties file, and when the "java.naming.security.principal" and "java.naming.security.credentials" properties are omitted, the server will start and deploy the application, but it naturally will not work.
    I have noticed that this issue has been brought up by several others:
    http://forums.bea.com/bea/search.jspa?q=%22Access+not+allowed+for+subject%3A+principals%3D%5B%5D%22&objID=&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15
    http://forums.bea.com/bea/thread.jspa?forumID=2058&threadID=200027601&messageID=200619947#200619947
    http://forums.bea.com/bea/thread.jspa?forumID=2051&threadID=200021662&messageID=200590642#200590642
    http://forums.bea.com/bea/message.jspa?messageID=200590569&tstart=0
    But have seen nothing resembling even a hint of a cause.
    Any suggestions that even get me going in the right direction would be appreciated.
    <pre>
    weblogic.management.NoAccessRuntimeException: Access not allowed for subject: principals=[], on ResourceType: Application Action: write, Target: Deployed
         at weblogic.management.internal.SecurityHelper$IsAccessAllowedPrivilegeAction.wlsRun(SecurityHelper.java:623)
         at weblogic.management.internal.SecurityHelper$IsAccessAllowedPrivilegeAction.run(SecurityHelper.java:510)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
         at weblogic.management.internal.SecurityHelper.isAccessAllowed(SecurityHelper.java:398)
         at weblogic.management.internal.RemoteMBeanServerImpl.private_setAttribute(RemoteMBeanServerImpl.java:430)
         at weblogic.management.internal.RemoteMBeanServerImpl.setAttribute(RemoteMBeanServerImpl.java:387)
         at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.setAttribute(MBeanProxy.java:741)
         at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invokeForCachingStub(MBeanProxy.java:475)
         at weblogic.management.configuration.ApplicationMBean_Stub.setDeployed(ApplicationMBean_Stub.java:408)
         at weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.setState(ApplicationManager.java:593)
         at weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.startConfigManager(ApplicationManager.java:740)
         at weblogic.management.mbeans.custom.ApplicationManager.start(ApplicationManager.java:501)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
         at weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invokeLocally(DynamicMBeanImpl.java:754)
         at weblogic.management.internal.DynamicMBeanImpl.invoke(DynamicMBeanImpl.java:733)
         at weblogic.management.internal.ConfigurationMBeanImpl.invoke(ConfigurationMBeanImpl.java:509)
         at com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1560)
         at com.sun.management.jmx.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:1528)
         at weblogic.management.internal.RemoteMBeanServerImpl.private_invoke(RemoteMBeanServerImpl.java:988)
         at weblogic.management.internal.RemoteMBeanServerImpl.invoke(RemoteMBeanServerImpl.java:946)
         at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invoke(MBeanProxy.java:954)
         at weblogic.management.internal.MBeanProxy.invokeForCachingStub(MBeanProxy.java:481)
         at weblogic.management.configuration.ApplicationManagerMBean_Stub.start(ApplicationManagerMBean_Stub.java:677)
         at weblogic.management.Admin.startApplicationManager(Admin.java:2821)
         at weblogic.management.AdminServerAdmin.startApplicationManager(AdminServerAdmin.java:624)
         at weblogic.management.Admin.finish(Admin.java:2299)
         at weblogic.management.AdminServerAdmin.finish(AdminServerAdmin.java:458)
         at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.resume(T3Srvr.java:971)
         at weblogic.t3.srvr.T3Srvr.run(T3Srvr.java:361)
         at weblogic.Server.main(Server.java:32)
    </pre>

    For others who have received this error, I'll post what I think has turned out to be the cause.
    Refer to
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jndi/jndi.html#471919
    Which says:
    =====
    When you create a JNDI Context with a username and password, you associate a user with a thread. When the Context is created, the user is pushed onto the context stack associated with the thread. Before starting a new Context on the thread, you must close the first Context so that the first user is no longer associated with the thread. Otherwise, users are pushed down in the stack each time a new context created. This is not an efficient use of resources and may result in the incorrect user being returned by ctx.lookup() calls.
    =====
    Our application caches the Context created, and that Context is used by other objects to perform lookups. Prior to Sp2, this caused no issues when including the username and password as part of the properties passed to the InitialContext constructor.
    I presume that closing the Context after it has been used would be the proper fix for this, but right now this Context is used in too many places once it is created. I was able to combat the issue by removing the username and password properties (java.naming.security.principal & java.naming.security.credentials) from the properties file. It seems to work as expected.

  • Limit PO Err Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services

    Hi,
    I am having a problem while replicating free text Limit PO's to R/3 in SRM 4.0 SP 13. The issue is while creating Free Text Limit SC with the  "Confirmation and Invoice" option checked in, the PO's get created in SRM but fails while replicating to R/3 and in RZ20 errors as "Combination of GR/IR control not allowed for external services" although in vendor master i don't have check for the field "GR-Based Invoice Verification".
    On the contrary while creating SC with the "Invoice Only" the PO is successfully replicated to R/3 with item category as B for limit orders.
    Now i have noticed if i make changes in the vendor master data i.e. check the flag "GR-Based Invoice Verification" then the PO in my first scenario gets replicated successfully and also with respect to the second scenario but it gets replicated in both the scenarios as item category "D".
    As far as SRM standard it should have ideally behave like the below:
    Limit SC with GR AND Invoice -> item category D
    Limit SC with invoice only -> item category B.
    Now my question is why do my PO's fail in R/3 in the first scenario and also if i check the flag in vendor master for GR-Based Invoice verification then in the second scenario the item category is "D" instead of "B".
    Thanks in Advance.
    Best Regards
    Anirban

    Hi Georg,
    We don't have any active implementation for the BADI BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI.
    Best Regards,
    Anirban

Maybe you are looking for