Inventory Count-Account Assignment

Hi,
At the time of Inventory count if there is any difference in the physical inventory we record that difference in the system (MI07 u2013 Post). At the time of that entry the difference is hit to a cost center. But the cost collector (account assignment) in our company is the WBS Element so I want this entry to charge to a default WBS Element. Can somebody tell me how to assignment this?
Thanks
GKP

Hi Gayani
You will have to use CO substitution OKC9...
It has to be written the same way as FI substitution....
A brief overview will be like this... If COBL-BUKRS=XXXX, COBL-KSTAR (Cost Element) = XXXX,
Then Substitute COBL-WBS Element = YYYYY
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Inventory receipt against account assigned Purchase order

Hi,
When we do the MIGO-GR against a normal purchase order, we debit the inventory and credit the GR/IR clearing account. I would like to know whether we can post the same entry while doing the MIGO-GR against an account assigned purchase order.
If there is any work around please let me know.
appreciate any inputs on this.

Hi Kishore Kumar
When you have an account assigned PO, the GR entry cannot be
Inventory A/C Dr and GR/IR A/c Cr
It can be either debit to Consumption Account or any exps A\c and credit
to GR/IR
Regards
Chandrasekaran

Goods Receipt against account assigned Purchase Order

Respected members,
I am doing the good receipt with movement type 101 and special stock E with ref to po.
In my purchase order in account assignment there is everything like sales order,internal order and profit centre and inventory gl account.
The inventory gl account made as a cost element 90.Account assigment category i am usingis M.
My problem is when i am doing good receipt it is generating only accounting document and in that value of profit centre and internal order is not coming for inventory gl account.It is not generating the profit centre document and co document.
But in Material Document everything is getting , I am able to have the all the values for the respective field.
I am not understanding where the values getting cleared off when it is generating a accounting document and why it is not geneating a controlling document.
The accounting document is posted to both balance sheet accounts
that is debit and credit entry.
I have checked the all configurations in obyc and omjj. but i am notgetting any clue.
And interesting thing is previously it is picking the values but now settings have been disturbed and now it is not picking ,why it so.
Please help me out as soon as possible.
Thanks a lot.

dear,
kindly ckeck in omjj in "gbb" account whether your g/l acc..has been assigned or not..
kindly also check whether you have maintained profit center and cost center in"okb9" ..
also see in mm03 costing views 1 you have entered correct profit center...
or create a new g/l acc in fr00 and see its postings..
regards
rewa

Purchase order and Account assignement category- Change

hi.,
We are trying to receive the Purchase order of High value components into INVENTORY.
However, most of these Purchase Orders were created with account assignments.
Because of that, if we receives these POs, they will be consumed against the object identified in the account assignment.
Additionally, some of these have been invoiced already and would need to be backed out from the finance side.
Question: How can we receive these STO Purchase orders and then make changes through Movement type ( or any other way ) so that the HIgh Value Components that are consumed against that AC assignment can be subsequently moved into Invenotory.
Also, what are the other options ( FI will not open Previous period) so that the PO's which have been invoiced can be reversed against that AC assignment.
Thanks All

hi Rajesh.,
As mentioned earlier, these Purchase orders are STO's which have been already created and we are waiting to do the GR for the same. Items in the STO PO are of High value which we need to bring into INVENTORY.
But, because these STO PO's were created with account assignments, if we do GR now, they will be consumed against the object identified in the account assignment.
Some of these STO PO's have been invoiced already and FI has indicated that they could cancel the invoices for those STO PO's in previous posting period.
Question again : How can we receive these STO Purchase orders and then make changes through Movement type ( or any other way ) so that the HIgh Value Components that are consumed against that AC assignment can be subsequently moved into Inventory and not to a cost Center (202)
Step (1) Can we cancel the Invoiced items> reverse the GR for invoiced Items>reverse STO for PO ?
Step (2) Can we reverse the STO for PO for which GR has not been done? then
Step (3) Change the PO through ME22N, remove the Account assignment category?
Or how do we correct this situation for
(1) PO's already invoiced.
(2) PO for which GR has not been made. How can we receive them into Stock and not Cost center.
Anticipating a reply
Thanks
Sri

Profit center at GR IR Clearing Account - MIGO (Account Assignment Q)

Dear all,
We are implementing SAP into a Real estate business client and based on requirements from the Finance we have agreed to have profit centre level balance sheet for each of tower
Hence lets take an example
There is a project with PC1 (Common Costs) and 3 buildings (PC2, PC3 and PC4 for each building). We have one plant for one project and hence in material master plant is given as PC1.
If we procure Raw materials specific to each building (account assignment Q) with WBS element of tower one and PC2 defined in account assignment of WBS master data, below is the mentioned entry which I am getting
Inventory A/c Dr. PC2
Clearing A/c Dr. PC1
To GR IR Clearing PC1
To Clearing A/c PC2
Profit center document splitting and zero balancing is active in my scenario
My issue is that GR IR Clearing should not take profit center from MM master, however it should override profit center of WBS element if procurement is done with account assignment Q
Request you to give your thoughts
Thanks
Nishu

Hi Kavita,
The purpose of creating profit center for each tower was to identify vendors / customers balance from Finance through profit center reporting
As mentioned in above scenario it does not makes sense to have inventory at tower profit center and GR / IR or vendor at HO Profit center
Any method available with which we can bypass material master profit center through document splitting or account assignment setting in material master.
My MM team is also working on it and they are not keen to have one plant for one profit center. Hence we are looking to find a workaround for the above situation
Thanks
Nishu

How to enter an account assignment category for a material.

Hi guys:
I am facing following error prompt,please tell me how to enter an account assignment category for a material.
thanks
Account assignment mandatory for material 0000000N6451 (enter acc. ***. cat.)
Message no. ME062
Diagnosis
There is no provision for value-based inventory management for this material type in this plant. Account assignment is thus necessary.
Procedure
Please enter an account assignment category.

HI Shyam :
Go to transaction type OMS2. Check whether the material type u are using is ticked for Value update.
If not,
a. Use a different material type
b. or Use an account assignment category.
How to use B,that is hot to enter an account assignment cateogory

How to remove a PO with account assignment K from MD04

Hi guys
I have create a Purchase Order in ME21N with account assignment K and removed the Goods receipt mark in delivery tab.
Will this PO be removed from MD04 and when?

Hi
My requirement is the following: My company have some suppliers which holds inventory for us. My company controlled that with contracts in SAP.
Som parts of this inventory must be scrapped if demand changes. Therefore we need to create a PO, where my compagny buy the materiels. We will never use these materials so the supplier can just scappe them at his site and there we unmark the Goods receipt mark and use account asignment K.
But the buyer will see the PO in MD04 and this create confusion, so I would like to be able to remove this from MD04.
Thanks!
Sune

Account assignment cannot be carried out because of different origin no

Hie Guru's
While saving excise invoice (J1iiN) iam getting the below error
Detailed Error Diagnosis :-
Account assignment cannot be carried out because of different origin no.
Message no. V1134
Diagnosis
The sales document to which you want to refer is based on sales document 10000003 and item 000010. Therefore, the settlement and possibly inventory management are carried out using the number of the preceding document.
System Response
This entry is not allowed.
Procedure
Enter the document and the item number of the preceding sales document.
NOTE :- IT'S MTO SCENARIO. WITH REQ CLASS 040 (Consumption :- E)
Thanks in advance,
Denish

Hie JP,
This is not related to project at all. The stock is purely reseved for my sales order (and since my sales order is created with reference to quotation the stock is reserved for my quotation). While debug I found the route cause for this, if we see the function module "SD_DOCUMENT_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT" (this FM is called at the time of quotation, sales order, stock taking, billing and excise invoice). Now in this FM :-
CALL FUNCTION 'SD_VBAK_SELECT'
    EXPORTING
      i_document_number = i_document_number
IF ( vbap-vbeln NE vbap-vbelv OR
       vbap-posnr NE vbap-posnv ) AND
       NOT vbap-vbelv IS INITIAL.
The i_document_number found in my excise invoice is sales order nmbr. Thus vbap-vbeln NE vbap-vbelv condition in my IF loop gets satisfied (because vbap-vbeln = sales order numbr & vbap-vbelv = quotation numbr) and it goes further. THIS SHOULD NOT GO FURTHER.
Like I said this FM is called at the time of billing also, so at that time the i_document_number is quotation number thus
vbap-vbeln NE vbap-vbelv codition does not satisfy (because vbap-vbeln = Quotation numbr & vbap-vbelv = Quotation numbr) and it doesnt fo further.
I hope I am able to convay my message. Please do let me know if you find something regarding the same because this is a Std. FM which will be same for everybody.
Regards,
Denish Patel
Edited by: denish__01 on Oct 12, 2011 9:59 AM
Edited by: denish__01 on Oct 12, 2011 10:01 AM

Account assignment in third party

Hii.....
Am doing third party purchase order processing, at the time of creting PO system ask for account assignment, can anyone expalin me why it is necessary to give the account assignment, and wat is the setting for account assignment.
Regards
SARFRAZ

Hi,
When you create a third party PO you create a goods receipt for that material in your plant but physically material is delivered to third party
In normal case when you receive goods system debits inventory and post credit to GR/IR but in this case since goods are not physically available it asks for an account assignment and treat those goods in the system as consumed i.e.delivered to third party
There are no seperate settings for account assignment
While creating PO on the line item beside material column you have to select Account assignment category where you want to show this consumption
Account assinment cat.are delivered std.by SAP you can check those -
SPRO>MM>Purchasing>accoutn assignment
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful

Validate account assignment in Sales Order

How do we get the account assignment (cost centre or internal order) validated in the sales order?
By 'validated' I mean to have them pass the CO account assignment rules where for us the accounts that are going to be posted to by this type of sales order are accounts that must have either a cost centre, or an internal order (real type) or both a cost centre and a (statistical) internal order.
The full details are ... we have a certain sales order type that is used whenever we are processing a 'no charge' (no charge to the customer) sales order and for these orders we want the goods issue from the delivery to charge the inventory value of the goods to the cost centre or internal order within the sales order, then also when the billing document is created (which is needed to post the additional conditions we have added to these no charge items) likewise this is to post those conditions to that same cost centre or internal order.
We have found that a user can supply both a cost centre and a real internal order, and of course when it comes to billing it will not post through.
Can the account assignment logic be checked at the sales order (create or change mode) and error message the user if they have supplied an invalid account assignment?
Thanks, Ken

hi,
can you check is there any user exit or enhancement available which can be used

Getting PO account assignment on both sides of the GR/IR accounting doc.

When the GR/IR accounting document is created in our system for a PO item that is account assigned to an order, network or cost centre, the following occurs. On the Goods Receipt, the GR/IR account does not capture the cost assignment on the GR/IR posting. On the Invoice Receipt, the GR/IR account posting does include the cost assignment on the GR/IR posting.
For Example:
MIGO posting generates this accounting entry
Debit Expense account, Order 12xxxxxx          $100
Credit GR/IR account                                          $100     (no order on GR/IR line)
MIRO
Credit Vendor                                                    $100
Debit GR/IR account, Order 12xxxxxx              $100 (order is posted with GR/IR line)
Although the GR/IR account is a balance sheet account, is it useful, for a reporting task, to have the cost assignment included in the financial posting for both GRu2019s and IRs, but it only appears on the IR side.
Is this something that can be solved by MM configuration?
Comparing posting keys 86 (IR) with posting key 96 (GR) u2013 the cost objects we used are set as optional for both those keys, so it doesnu2019t appear to be posting key configuration.
Note: When the PO item is assigned to a material (GR to inventory) the material appears on both sides of the GR/IR postings in Accounting, which is what we want for items account assigned to orders, networks, and cost center too.
Thank you. Alvin.

Thanks, but we still get the account assignment posted to GRIR during MIRO (as shown in Alvin's original post) so the full explanation cannot be the fact that GRIR is a balance account.
Essentially, we would like GR and IR-events to pass the same account assignment string to GR/IR, except posting key.
Thanks for helping.

MM automatic account assignment for MIGO (additional accounting lines)

Hi MM Experts!
I created a PO (only 1 material in it), and after that I did a GR goods receipt in MIGO for this.
Movement type: 101
When I did this the accounting lines looks like that:
Itm PK Account    Account short text   Assignment...........................Amount
                                                                                1 89 21411000   Vás. villamosenergia      XXXX...........................................3.000.000
2 96 29700000   Tech.acct.purch.stoc 450000012800010...................3.000.000-
I run the transaction OMWB, and did a simulation, and it ok:
Inventory posting                   0002 -e-      SEVV 89 21411000    99 21411000
GR/IR clearing account          0002            SEVV 86 29700000    96 29700000
So the MIGO 101 movement type for GR goods receipt did a BSX (Stock posting) and a WRX (GR/IR clearing) accounting.
I need the following:
If I do a MIGO with 101 movement (GR goods receipt), not just this 2 accounting line created, but I need +4 additional line (these lines are special taxes).
So if I do a MIGO I have to see:
1 89 21411000   Vás. villamosenergia      XXXX...........................3.000.000
2 96 29700000   Tech.acct.purch.stoc 450000012800010 ..3.000.000-
3 89 53471000   T.........................................................................1.500.000
4 96 46382100   K1......................................................................1.500.000-
5 89 51420000   T2.........................................................................750.000
6 96 47999421   K2.........................................................................750.000-
Is it possible? How can I do it?
I search in OBYC, but I canu2019t find appropriate solution.
Thanks for the answers.
Peter

Hi,
In 1st case, you have entry in Goods Receipt of inventory value debited(3.000.000 +) and GR/IR clearing(3.000.000 -). As all value flow from purchase order which with NET VALUE with pricing elements( condition type/types).
As in 2nd case you wanted.....with addition of above accounting entries, extra 4 lines needed but what are the two amounts represents ( 1.500.000 &   750.000)?
If so needed you should have two extra condition types in PO for amount representing 1.500.000 &   750.000.The condition types must be there in MM pricing procedure in M/08, maintain the account keys with a accrual key for each condition type. For condition types for both in M/06 , maintain condition category is must( do not keep blank, keep as B)& also select accrual check box in control data.In OBYC, maintain the two different G/L accounts for two accrual keys.
Also activate the Purchase account management in the Company code in following path:
SPRO> Materials Management> Valuation and Account Assignment> Account Determination> Account Determination Without Wizard> Purchase Account Management> Activate Purchase Account in Company Code
After above setting, Create a PO and do goods receipt and check accounting entries.
Regards,
Biju K

Account assignment for Movt type 101 and 501

All SAP Gurus,
We want to do the account assignment for movt types 101, 102, 122, 123, 201, 202, 261, 262 accourding to the movement types.
We are aware that the Transaction Key is 'GBB'.
But how to know that which 'General Modification' is used for which movement types.
(in short where we can find this link between movement types and Transaction Key and 'General Modification')
Regards,

To know this first you have to know what does the different general modifications means for GBB:
AUA: for order settlement
AUF: for goods receipts for orders (without account assignment)
and for order settlement if AUA is not maintained
AUI: Subsequent adjustment of actual price from cost center directly
to material (with account assignment)
BSA: for initial entry of stock balances
INV: for expenditure/income from inventory differences
VAX: for goods issues for sales orders without
account assignment object (the account is not a cost element)
VAY: for goods issues for sales orders with
account assignment object (account is a cost element)
VBO: for consumption from stock of material provided to vendor
VBR: for internal goods issues (for example, for cost center)
VKA: for sales order account assignment
(for example, for individual purchase order)
VKP: for project account assignment (for example, for individual PO)
VNG: for scrapping/destruction
VQP: for sample withdrawals without account assignment
VQY: for sample withdrawals with account assignment
ZOB: for goods receipts without purchase orders (mvt type 501)
ZOF: for goods receipts without production orders
(mvt types 521 and 531)
You can also define your own account groupings. If you intend to post goods issues for cost centers (mvt type 201) and goods issues for orders (mvt type 261) to separate consumption accounts, you can assign the account grouping ZZZ to movement type 201 and account grouping YYY to movement type 261
Then go and check OMWN.
Regards,
Indranil

Account assignment for movement type 221

Hi,
Instead of using account suggested by GBB-VBR for movement type 221 we want to use account entered by user in transaction as an offset to inventory account.
However SAP keeps on hitting account determined automatically (from GBB-VBR) and ignores account entered by user in transaction. In fact account entered by user in transaction is getting replaced by GBB--VBR and is also not available in any table (MSEG etc)
I have already checked - checkbox "Check account assignment" that states preference to user entered account in transaction, in movement type -- account grouping config but for no use.
Please help
Thanks,
Ashutosh
Edited by: Ashutosh_x on Apr 6, 2010 7:22 PM
Edited by: Ashutosh_x on Apr 6, 2010 7:23 PM
Edited by: Ashutosh_x on Apr 6, 2010 7:25 PM

In OBYC for Transaction GBB, instead of BSX, maintain BSA, VAX & VAY for each Valuation Class of material and its respective G/L Account.
For example, if you are trying for a FERT material, then the entries should be
0001::::BSA:::::7920::::::4XXX30
0001:::VAX:::::7920:::::::5XXX30
0001:::VAY:::::7920:::::::6XXX30
Also check in OMJJ whether you have the settings as follows:-
MvT::S::Val.Upd:::Qty.upd:::Mvt::Cns:::Val.stng:::Cn:::TEKey:::Acc mod:::Check acct.
561::::::::::::X::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::WA01:::::2:::::GBB:::::::BSA::::::::::::::::X
561::::::::::::X::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::WA01:::::3:::::PRD::::::::PRA:::::::::
561::::::::::::X::::::::::::X:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::WA01::::::2::::GBB:::::::BSA:::::::::::::::::X
561::::::::::::X::::::::::::X:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::WA01::::::3:::::PRD:::::::PRA:::::::::
Check whether your settings are similar to above.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Account assignment for Movement type 561

Dear Professionals
Hi,
I am new to SD.
Pls give me ur advice.
In my environment,
MB1C:"Enter Other goods Receipt"
-> Journal: "dr.Inventory/cr.COGS"
(Movement type: 561)
VL01N:"Outbound Delivery Create"
-> Journal: "dr.Inventory/cr.COGS"
(Movement type:601)
I guess that the journal for MB1C is incorrect.
I configured BSX and GBB on OBYC,
but I have no idea how to change the account assignment per Movement type.
Use OBWM?
BR
Y.Kaneko

In OBYC for Transaction GBB, instead of BSX, maintain BSA, VAX & VAY for each Valuation Class of material and its respective G/L Account.
For example, if you are trying for a FERT material, then the entries should be
0001::::BSA:::::7920::::::4XXX30
0001:::VAX:::::7920:::::::5XXX30
0001:::VAY:::::7920:::::::6XXX30
Also check in OMJJ whether you have the settings as follows:-
MvT::S::Val.Upd:::Qty.upd:::Mvt::Cns:::Val.stng:::Cn:::TEKey:::Acc mod:::Check acct.
561::::::::::::X::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::WA01:::::2:::::GBB:::::::BSA::::::::::::::::X
561::::::::::::X::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::WA01:::::3:::::PRD::::::::PRA:::::::::
561::::::::::::X::::::::::::X:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::WA01::::::2::::GBB:::::::BSA:::::::::::::::::X
561::::::::::::X::::::::::::X:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::WA01::::::3:::::PRD:::::::PRA:::::::::
Check whether your settings are similar to above.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Inventory Count-Account Assignment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for