Issue during IO settlement

Hi Gurus
I need your help with the following issue. We have Internal orders with AUC number specified. We enter this Io number in PO and after we do goods receipt and invoice gets paid, we settle the IO against the AUC. The issue is that each PO can have more than one line item and there could be more than 1 PO for each Internal Order. When we do the settlement (KO88), we get the summary amounts and not the line item breakdown. As a result, when we create fixed asset to settle the final costs from AUC to FA, we have no idea which PO or line item should be capitalized unless drilling down each PO.
Can someone please guide me if it is possible to get the line item details during these settlement processes or what is the SAP best practice?
I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Shalu

Hi Sayujya
I am doing exactly what you have mentioned in your reply but with settlement rule for only one line item, KO88 in test mode is displaying full settlement. I have also tried specifying amounts instead of percentage but didn't work. If I create FA for all line items and enter the distribution rule for only one, the amounts gets distributed and are not correct amounts.
My end to end steps are as follows:
1. Create IO and set the status as released. As this is Investment type order, AUC gets aautomatically created.
2. I created a PO with 2 line items ($100 and $300). I did the Goods receipt and entered invoice for this PO.
3. I settled these amounts from PO to Io using tcode KO88 and Automatic settlement. The IO gets debited with $ 400.
4. I created a complete asset in KO02 and saved the IO. Then I went to KOB5 and for this IO, I selected the line item with $ 100. I clicked the Final settlement tab and entered FXA, FA number and amount as 100. I went back and the line item had green light. The other line item had red light. I saved the rule.
5. I went to KO88 and for this IO, I selected Partial settlement and in test mode, the amount being displayed is $ 400.
6. I tried to create second complete asset in KO02 and saved it. Now with the same rules in KOB5 for previous asset with $100 as amount, when I go to KO88 and partial capitalization, the test mode amounts are $ 250 for first asset and $150 for second asset though I have not even entered the distribution rules for the second asset.
I am not sure if you will be able to help me with this but any advice will be helpful.
Thanks,
Shalu

Similar Messages

Validation or User-Exit during AuC settle (AIBU)

Hi Gurus
I'd like to perform some checks during AuC Settle using AIBU Transaction.
Someone knows if is possible to do it using Exit, Badi oìr Validation ????
Thanks in advance for your reply.
Claudio

Hi Markus
Thank-you for your reply ???
I need just to issue a warning message to remenber to the user to do a manual operation when his run AIBU (or AIAB) transaction.
This is becuse we need to link and equipment to the relative asset, and when the equipment is in AuC state, it link teh AuC asset, while when it has been capitalized teh equipment must link the final asset. The issue is requested for reporting needs.
Thank-you for you help.
Claudio

Update COPA characteristic values during order settlement - KO88

Hi,
We need to update some COPA characteristic values during order settlement using T-code KO88.
Looked for options in KEDR transaction, did not find any exits.
Could some one help us to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Vikram

Hello and thanks for your response.
We have actually created the new characteristic (WWCRE) and we are populating it in the user exit. I think the issue is that the characteristic may be 05012010 at the time of the sales order, but it is 04012010 at the time of billing.
Unfortunately, the PAOBJNR in the billing doc is the same as the order and the user exit doesn't seem to accept the changed value or create a new entry in the CE tables.
For example, if I change the sales order to cause a new WWCRE value, the system automatically generates a new PAOBJNR but at the time of billing, regardless of changes to the values, it simply keeps the old PAOBJNR from the sales order and doesn't reflect the changes.
I hope that makes some sense. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions.
>Ray

Issues during Component Batch Determination for Process Orders

Hi,
I am encountering a strange issue during component batch determination of process order.
1. During creation of process order, when I execute batch determination, systems does determination based on strategies we have set and when I click on Copy it gives an error
"Log cannot be saved: Object/subobject not specified"
Message no. BL201
*Diagnosis
Log save cancelled because at least one log contains no object or subobject.
Object and subobject are needed to classify application logs because there are several log types. Only a few logs are managed in main memory at runtime, so this classification is not needed.
If the logs are to be saved in the database, object/subobject must be specified for later retrieval.
Procedure for System Administration
Object/sub object can be passed when a log is created (function module BAL_LOG_CREATE) and changed with BAL_LOG_CHANGE.
The possible values for object and sub object must be configured in transaction SLG0.*
If I save the order with CRTD status and come back again in change mode and do determination, It works fine.
Again when the order is in REL status and do the determination, It gives the same error.
This happens only for a specific plant, In other plants batch determination works in all scenarios.
I checked for all plant related Config for batch determination and coudn't find any discrepancies.
Please advise how to resolve this issue. Thanks in advance for your help
Regards,
Aheesh

There Is no direct solution for your requirement just try this work around.
While defining the batch determination search strategy for process order in COB1, there is one column Quantity proposal where you can attach the Routines (This is written in ABAB code ) make use of this, define New Routines with ABAB help to fulfill your requirement. Try this if found useful award full points.
Regards,
Ajay Nikte

Issue during automatic Creation of Work Order from Notification

Hi,
I have a issue during automatic Creation of Work Order from Notification.
BADI implemented: NOTIF_EVENT_POST
BAPI called in BADI: BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
I am able to create Work Order successfully but after that i need to update notification header with created work order number.
But i am unable to update the same (VIQMEL-AUFNR).
Can anybody provide solution for the same!
Thanks,
Kumar.

Hi,
Any inputs on above posted issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Kumar.

Automating Goods issue during Delivery creation

Hi all,
We have a requirement to automate the Goods issue creation for certain type of orders when the Delivery is getting created. The orders that need to be automatically Goods issued during delivery creation are identified based on certain plants. These plants are linked to certain output type and in the output type routine is the standard program RVADEK01 with one additonal code for automating the Goods Issue creation.
We have a custom table that holds the status of orders and there is a code in user exit userexit_save_document_prepare which changes the status of the order as closed when the goods issue is done.
But when the delivery is saved, in this case when an automatic goods issue needs to happen, when the flow reaches this user exit, the output type code dosenot get executed and the Goods issue is not done and so the custom table will not be updated with the closed status. So we are in need to findout a place where we can update the status of the order in that table.
The output type code is not executed even before the other user exit userexit_save_document. The output type code gets executed and goods issue is done after the this userexit_save_document when the COMMIT statement is executed in the subroutine BELEG_SICHEN_POST in the include FV50XF0B_BELEG_SICHERN.
I need help in finding out if any user exit or badi is called after this commit statement, so that I can add my code to close the status of the order in my custom table. Just after this commit the Goods issue happens and the VBFA table gets updated with the 'R' records for goods issue.
Please let me know if anyone has any idea on this. The ultimate goal is to find some place after the goods issue is done to update the status of the order as closed in the custom table we have.
Thanks,
Packia

Dear Siva,
As informed yesterday I changed the language from DE to EN, to match the other shipping points settings in table V_TVST, this did not bring the solution.
Please let me summarize, I am really desparate here:
This is only IM related, Not WM.
Picking lists are not printed for any Shipping Point from this warehouse, this is just a small subsidiary of my customer in Finland.
Issue is not Aut. PGI.
VP01SHP has not been configured for any shipping points, still there we do get the PR except for the new shipping point.
In the deliveries of correct processed shipping points I do not find any picking output type.
Item category in new shipping is equal to Item category in already existing shipping points, so no need to config here.
There is no picking block active.
PR creation happens once I enter the pick qty in the delivery in VL02N. This is the part that we need to have automated.
Can you please try to help me out?
Tnx & regards,
Chris

Warning message during the settlement of WBSE

Hi,
We have PS structure. During the settlement cost booked in WBSE moves to AUC & from AUC to final asset.
While settling the cost from AUC to Final asset, I am getting the warning message " Asset Value date earlier that Asset Capitalization date". If I am still continues then settlement for the that WBSE will be done.
Now what are the impact of this warning mesage to WBSE settlement, Depreciation run & its value calculation.
Please advice whether I should continue this type of settlement or do some rectifications..
Thanks & Reagrds,
Pradip

When you do the settlement to your final asset you can fill in the Asset Value date (right part of the screen).
This date is used to derivate the capitalization date and then the depreciation start date (it is possible to fill this in manual, or to change it manual in the asset TC AS02)
You have to look in the in the asset what is in and what is the reason of the message TC AS03

Critical Issues During SAP Implementation or After Golive

Can anybody tell me one of the most critical/ challenging issues During SAP Implementation or After Golive
in these modules:-
MM implementation
PP implementation
SD implementation
FI/CO implementation
PS implementation
QM implementation
HR implementation
BI implementation
XI implementation
Thanks and regards
RS

hi,
I will list out few of critical issues in
Implementation :
1 . Ensure 100% mapping of business process for all modules with SAP(avoid customization in support phase)
2. Unit & Integeration testing should be through with all validations
3. Master datas(Vendor,Customer) care must be taken will uploading datas thru LSMW,
If there are common vendors for all plants,Create a vendor for a plant extend it to other plants
4. Check tax procedures are customized according to requirements.
5. Complete all print document customizations before go live
6. Complete end user training(2 or more cycles) should be top priority before go live(This will avoid
cancellation/reversal of documents after post go live)
7. Ready with standard MIS reports & customized reports for business decision making
8. Excise opening balance updation in tables for RG1 register in tables(Note 951955) on go live
9. Check all tables datas are updating correctly
10. Declare go live to SAP Support
11. Check All user authorization should be correct according to their roles.
12. Centeralize all master datas creation(avoid duplication)
13. Create transaction variants to avoid entires in unnecessary fields & make certain fields mandatory.
14. Ensure document numbering is completed for all documents
15. Validate accounting entries are hit properly according to requirement in quality client with FI CTM(Core team member).
After Go live :
1. Missing authorization for users will play key part here,For ex : PGI while doing delivery,Excise capture & post in MIGO/J1IEX.
2. Do internal audit every month,identify transactions if there will possibility for misuse or wrong entries,requires validation,identify users weak in certain areas.
3. Identify there is enhancements to be done in transaction process(By step-2)
4. Prepare a list of month & year end activities to be performed for all modules give to users
5. Prepare a list of frequently used transaction codes module wise give it to users
6. If there is subcontracting,ensure challan creation,GR,reconcillation should be done regulary(monthly)
7. Train the users,take reports in respective modules.
8. Additonal customization might be done in print documents.
9. Instruct users/CTM's to adapt SAP Standard practise
10. Update excise tax rates after every indian budget
Hope it helps.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Apr 29, 2010 6:48 PM

FI Entries during AUC settlement

Hi
We have made the WBS statiscal in our projects and costs are directly collected in AUC. WBS is used for Budget control and its working fine till AUC settlement.
During AUC settlement, an credit entry is getting posted to WBS and as a result the Assigned cost is getting reduced and More budget is available now.
is there any way to handle this scenario
warm regards,
Ramakrishna

..

Issue during Save - BDT

Hi All,
I have added 2 custom fields in the additional tab of the BP transaction using BDT.
I have enhanced the table BUT000 with the above two fields using append structure.
But now i got following few issues during saving the BP.
1) Not able to save those two custom field values in the corresponding table of BUT000.
     As i was new to BDT could any one guide me how to save the custom field information in BDT?
2) If I am changing any one of the fields and trying to save for any existing BP,
      It was throwing a message saying 'No changes done to the transaction'.
      Here the Transaction was not recognizing the fields even if the changes done.
      Could any one please let me know how to handle this?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Gopi.

Hi,
1> Did you implement function module for DSAVE event? Check if you have different names for the field in the BDT table and the database table in the BDT setting
Assign field to DB
2> You need to write a function module for XCHNG event and export 'X' after checking the old and new memory for changes. This will correct the message.
Thanks and warm regards,
Smita.

Any Userexit & BADI for transaction VB(7 during final settlement

Hi SAP GURUS,
I have checked no user exit and BADI. Any Userexit & BADI for transaction VB(7 during final settlement. During final settlement of rebate, I have to change the amount from KONP table in transaction VB(7 . Let me know the userexit and BADI.
Regards,
Karthik.

Hi Sekhar,
These following BADI are not capturing KONP item details.
I want to capture KONP item details to modify amount.
ARC_SD_COND_CHECK : Archiving Object SD_COND: Additional Checks
ARC_SD_COND_WRITE : Archiving Object SD_COND: Archive Additional Data
SD_COND_SAVE_A : Save condition application A, E
Regards,
Karthik.

Public Sector: Will this have any issues during Siebel upgrade?

Hello,
We are using Siebel Public Sector application (Case Management) in our product.
Every contact who is Primary under a Contact will be associated to a Master Case. If there is no master case associated with primary contact, siebel will create a new master case. In other words, Contact to Master Case is 1:1 relationship.
We are in the process of developing a new requirement where in a Contact can be linked to one or more Master Cases (1:M). Since this is deviates Siebel OOB feature we do not want to change it.
Instead, we have created a new custom stand-alone Table (which mimics OOB Master Case columns) and a "New Custom BC".
Created a link betwen Contact BC and New Custom BC (Id -> Par Row Id).
In "New Custom BC", field called "Master Case Number" has a dynamic picklist based on OOB "PUB Master Case" BC.
For other field we have mapped using pickmaps.
Our requirement is met but our only question is "Will this have any issues during Siebel upgrade?"
Quick responses will be very helpful.

Thank you for your reply. I only see three versions of Adobe Reader available for Windows XP SP3 at the Adobe site
http://get.adobe.com/reader/otherversions
In doing some research, it seems there were some issues if you skipped an update but I did not find any information (only other queries) as to my original question of compatibility. Also, how can we access the older file if it won't open in 10.1.2?
Can I load 10.1.2 in addition to their older version to check and see what will or will not open correctly before I uninstall the older version? I don't want to load the new version and then have them not be able to access a needed file...

Error during automatic settlement rule creation

Hi Gurus,
For the investment project, I maintained as follows, first level WBSE - Only planning element - no settlement. 2nd level WBSE - settled to AuCs. For level three & below settled to Superior WBSE. I had created the Settlement type with '5'. When I am executing CJB2 to create the Settlement rules automatically, I am getting the following error message for level 3 & below WBSE.
Enter a valid value for the settlement type :
Message no. KD199
Diagnosis
The system found a settlement type settlement type in the settlement rule which either does not exist or is unsuitable for the sender.
Procedure
If possible, enter a suitable settlement rule. Remember that the rules for preliminary settlement ("PRE") of capital investment measures are different from those for period settlement ("PER") of other settlement senders. Periodic settlement only makes sense for capital investment measures. They must not have any "PER" rules.
To enter an investment profile (in the control data for an order or WBS element) or to remove it. However, first delete the PER or PRE rules (in the settlement rule) and er zu in internal orders, you can first change the investment profile and then adapt the rules before you save.
Error(s) during creation of settlement rule :
Message no. ORB509
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Check whether the:
Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
Settlement profile Z7 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
can anyone help me where I am making mistake or what is the procedure to be adopted for such scenario.
somebody else also had discussed the same issue in this forum but there is no answer for this.
thanks in advance
Vinodh

hi Sreenivas,
Thanks for your reply,
I tried this, system is giving the following error now
Could not find a superior WBS element for WBS element
Message no. CJ115
Diagnosis
The system could not find a superior element for a WBS element while it was executing the function 'Derive structure'
System Response
Processing stopped.
What could be the reason ?
thanks in advance,
Vinodh

FI Document created during WBS settlement

Hi Everyone,
I have an issue regarding the FI document generated while running CJ88 for WBS settlement. We settle a WBS to a Cost Center, after it, three documents are created, an FI document, a CO document and a Profit center Document.
Logic tells me there shouldnt be an FI document in this situation since im settleing between two cost objects. For example when we settle internal orders no FI document is generated.
I've checked many threads in SCN about said FI document and i cant find a definitive reason as for why is this document is generated during the settlemet, many threads about it are not answered and some others are not very conclusive.
Nevertheless! I can live with the FI document but i'd like to change it from the standard "SA" document to "ZA" for analysis purposes. We created de document type and i've changed the settlement profile to use ZA but still after we settle a WBS an SA document is created.
Can anyone shine any light on this issue? either pointing me in the right direction to modify the document type or by explaining why is it generated?
Thank you in advance for your time.
Pelayo.

Hello Chauhan,
My settlement profile is enabeled for Cost Center, Order and Fixed Assets all as optional, however the settlement rule in this specific scenario is from WBS to Ctr. (both elements have a Profit ctr. assigned.
Under Other parameters i've set Document type as "ZL".
The system creates an FI document like this.
50
5XXXXXXXX1
123.456,00-
USD
PCtr 2
40
5XXXXXXXX1
123.456,00
USD
CCtr 1
PCtr 1

Issue during creation of control cycle

Dear Gurus,
During creation of control cycle (LPK1), the fields for source information is not appearing in my system.
I compared control cycle in a different ECC system where source information is appearing.
How can make the screen appear in my ECC system.
Please find the screenshot.
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
This thread is further to the thread in Production Planning Forum
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3609441
With Regards,
Malay

Manish,
I do not understand how this going to solve the issue because why we need both KANBAN and WM control cycles for one material withdrawal for production?
Br
KK

Issue during IO settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for