Issue with Freight condition with scales
HI Experts
We have requirement like below.
When customer send an order
o if the order contains materials for a minimum quantity the system should not apply freight condition
o if the order contains materials for less than minimum quantity the system should apply freight condition
For example: sales condition freight has scale
scale qty unit amount unit
From 0 PC 18,3 u20AC
4 PC 0 u20AC
e.g.1 customer send order that contain 9 PC, so system NOT apply freight condition
material quantity
x1 1
x2 1
x3 2
x4 5
e.g.2 customer send order that contain 2 PC, so system apply freight condition
material quantity
x1 1
x2 1
For this we have maintained Group condition and maintained scales up to 3 Order quantity 18 EUR . If order quantity is greater than 4 condition should not apply.
But Now our issue is when ever Material determination is occurring in Order our condition is going to fail. For example order quantity is 2 with TAPA item(parent item) and so substitute Item also 2 quantity (Tan item). In this case system is reading order quantity as 4 and our condition is 0. But actual quantity is 2 condition should apply in Order.
Could you please suggest us where we can control this kind of scenario.
Regards, Lakshmikanth
Done through user exit
Similar Messages
-
Hi All
I have one sharepoint list with huge data i.e with 20columns and more than 200 records with the fields .
Suppose lets consider there are A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H columns.
Now i want to create one form with the fields A,C,E.
When the user enter the existing data of list for columns A,C..based on C value the E column value should change and update that particular item in the list.
Please guide me without visual web part can we acheive this by Sharepoint designer 2013 or what would be the preferable solution.
Please help me on this as it is very urgent from me..
Thanks in Advance
Sowjanya GHi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to update the list item in the same sharepoint list with particular condition with Sharepoint Designer 2013.
I recommend to create workflow associated to the list and then start the workflow automatically when an item is changed.
In the workflow, you can add condition and actions as below:
If current item: C equal to Test1
Set E to Test2
Then the value of the filed E will be changed based on the value of the filed C.
In addition, if you create the form using InfoPath, you can add rule to the filed C as below:
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support -
View with selection conditions with system fields.
Hi Experts,
I have a view. Now i want to control the data that is selected using 'Selection Conditions'.
here i want to use system field SY-DATUM.
My requirement is i want to control the output like
Valid_From_Date GE SY-DATUM and
Valid_To_Date LE SY-DATUM
which means that i would be showing only active users in this view.
How can i go about this? System is not allowing system fields in comparision value.
Any help on this is highly appreciated. Thanks.
regards,
SimhaHi,
I am getting a warning first 'enter constant as comparision value'
when i trying to activate the view i am getting the below error.
A join condition on a field of the system table SY (or SYST) was defined.
This is not permitted for database views because the system table is not known to the database
Have tried to activate the view you created?
How to go about this?
Regards,
Simha -
STO with freight--to beloaded on material at GR--Critical
Hi,
Scenario:Cross company stock transport
Goods are transfered from plants A to B.
PO in B with freight condition FRB1 is to be created.
Goods issued against this PO.
Goods are received in th B plant.
B comes to know the EXACT freight costs ( clearing charges,customs transportation etc) only after goods reach to B, so he wants to enter/modify the EXACT cost at the time of GR ie to load this cost on material.
But once GI is done, system does not allow to change/add the conditions in PO.
How this can be handled so to have delivery costs loaded on material at the time of GR in plant B?
This question has been raised by me earlier also but yet to find out any conclusive suggestion.This is very critical for me.
PLEASE suggest how this type of requirement is mapped.I am sure this is a very commonly followed process in any industry and in SAP must be mapped.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
manOOHi Sairam,
Thanks for the feedback.
In my case the exact delivery costs are only known when the goods reach the destination.
I can put some prefixed value as the delivery cost.But once I issue the goods vide delivery created, I can not alter the freight costs.
In most of the cases, it will be very difficult to put the exact costs in PO and that is the problem.
How this can be handled then ?
Is there any way by means of which we can have conditions in Inbound delivery by means of which I can create a Inbound delivery and put the exact conditions there ..
Please suggest a another approach.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
manOO -
Dropship Process - Account assigned PO with Freight
Hi Experts
Scenario - We have a process defined for third-party drop ship with PO Account assigned to 'Y - 3rd Party W/O SN' and to a GL account based on this account assignment.
We have an automatic price determination for a condition type for 'Drop ship charges' - This is a charge client pays to the vendor for doing the drop shipment. This condition type is basically a copy of freight condition with accounting key to FRE.
Based on the account assignment there is no GR and thus an IR is done for the PO after the customer confirms that he has received the material.
We have activated 'Debit delivery costs separately' indicator in the account assignment for separating the drop ship charges.
Expectation - In the IR, the cost of the goods has to be accounted to the consumption account 500000 in the PO and the drop ship to be accounted to the GL assigned to FRE 501005.
What is happening - cost of goods as well as the drop-ship charges are getting accounted to the consumption account in the PO as shown in the MIRO screen,
Will appreciate if you can suggest a way to make this work as the expectation without doing a GR.
Thank you for reading the storyHi,
any changes made in sales order will be updated in PR but not into PO. now if you have raised PO with less qty then change in the sales order and create a new line item while first line will have the qty equal to po qty. then you can go ahead with this.
this is actually a work around for the changes in PO to be incorporated in to sales order.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar -
Race conditions with UI thread
Hi community,
the update to LabVIEW 2014 has caused sveral of my vis to act up - vis that I had coded with race conditions with the UI thread that I was not aware of.
Maybe they didn't exist previously, maybe I was just ignorant.
Here is a where I first noticed something was wrong. It has a workaround inside:
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/How-to-make-sure-plots-in-xy-graph-are-present/td-p/3033109
Thanks again Norbert for your help with that.
Now problems are showing up in other places too and it might be the tip of an iceberg. I'm a little afraid right now. It's not just xy graphs. The latest example:
I have a sub-vi whose frontpanel I open with an invoke node inside that sub-vi. Afterwards, in the caller I register for events of frontpanel objects of the sub-vi. This fails now - apparently the fp of the sub-vi isn't open yet although the sub-vi has finished executing (yes, I use dataflow to ensure register for event is done only after the sub-vi has finished). This has a striking resemblance to my issue in the previous thread. It seems that vis can now be "finished" executing while stuff that was supposed to happen inside the sub-vi is still executing in the UI thread.
I had not expected this.
Is this intended behaviour?
Is this new to LabVIEW 2014?
Can someone please shed some light on this behavior change (if indeed it is one)?
Can someone please advise me on a general solution/workaround for the host of problems this is causing me?
Best regards
FlorianNorbert,
I'm currently unable to reproduce the issue in my code regardless of cpu core affinity (you gotta hate random errors).
I have attached an example that shows a simplified version of the code that has previously produced the error.
This example might be flawed since it hasn't produced the error yet.
The issue would show when the button "open window" is pressed, if it did at all.
Also there is stuff in there that I just implemented in an attempt to keep the UI thread busy.
For the core of the issue please disregard the bottom while loop in caller.vi
I'll keep trying.
Best regards
Florian
Attachments:
subvi event registration.llb 56 KB -
Freight Condition on Contract is copied to Release PO Header
Hello,
We have a contract for raw materail with freight condition (value) attached to the line item not the header. When release purchase order is created the freight condition is copied over to the HEADER not the line item and Is distributing the freight cost to all line items. We expect the total value of the freight condition to be applied to the Po line item. Can anyone explain why this happens and how to fix?
Best regards,
DianeHi Diane,
how did you set up the freight condition in your customizing? Is it a group condition? Please test the issue when it is NOT a group condition. The settings in the customizing should be for a fixed amount condition:
Cond. class A Discount or surchar
Calculat.type B Fixed amount
Cond.category B Delivery costs
X item condition
or for a percentage condition:
Cond. class A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type A Percentage
Cond.category B Delivery costs
X item condition
Regards,
Edit -
Freight condition value modify after reverse GR
Hi
I have done PO with freight condition FR1 and done GR again i reverse GR now i want to change my PO freight value but system is not allowed, in Config i have removed Dlivery cost B in Condition type now it will work but i want to know this is correct way or not or any other option.
What is use of Delivery cost B in PO,GR or MIRO, please explain this
Please suggest solution
Thanks
Shital DHi,
I have created two POs with & with out the config option : Delivery Costs - B. But in both the cases, the system does not allow the change in the freight percentage FRA1. For standard conditions like FRA1, the control will be entirely throgh the backend program. If you need to work with configuration/control data of the condition type, please create Z-condition by copying the std condition and try to change the control data.
thanks & regards
Chaitanya Rayaprolu -
Freight condition modify after reverse GR
Hi,
I have done PO with freight condition FR1 and done GR again i reverse GR now i want to change my PO freight value but system is not allowed, in Config i have removed Dlivery cost B in Condition type now it will work but i want to know this is correct way or not or any other option.
What is use of Delivery cost B in PO,GR or MIRO, please explain this
Please suggest solution
Thankhi
it is not possible to change value once GR is done
go for addition of new item (copy of original )
or take the freight in unplanned del cost -
Freight condition getting multiplied with the quantity
Dear Gurus,
I have configured freight condition, ZHD0, copied from HD00. When I am putting Rs 1000 in header, if i have 10 quantities, it is getting multipled with 10 and getting the total as 10000. I want it to be 1000 only and not get multipled with the quantity. Kindly suggest what needs to be done.
Also, if there are 10 line items, the freight value should not be multipled with the quantity.
Kindly suggest
Shilpa ShahHi;
This could be issue of unit of measure. The sales unit of measure might be different than pricing unit of measure. So system might picking the unit conversion from material master. Like if your sales unit is CS and pricing PC. in material if it is maintained like 1 CS =10 PC. In this case system will multiply the amount.
I hope this will help.
Regards;
Avinash -
Hi Gurus,
I am working on freight related condition type,my requirement is we have to calculate freight cost based on Delivery Item (per PC) / Volume of that Material (Per PC) and Destination Region of each Delivery Order.
for example:
If Material '100001' has volume = 1 M3 per PC and Destination region code (in Delivery Order) is '20'. The Freight cost is 1 USD per PC.
If Material '100001' has volume = 1 M3 per PC and Destination region code is '22'. The Freight cost is 1.5 USD per PC.
If Material '100002' has volume = 1.5 M3 per PC and Destination region code is '20'. The Freight cost is 2 USD per PC.
If Material '100002' has volume = 1.5 M3 per PC and Destination region code is '22'. The Freight cost is 3 USD per PC.
I'm try to set calculation type = 'T - Multi-dimensional' and having 2 Scale Basis as following:
Scale Basis = 'F - Volume'
Scale Basis = 'L7 - Region of Destination'
but it result in error in calculation when creating Shipment cost document.
I don't sure whether my understanding on Multi-dimensional scale is correct or not. Please kindly help.
Thank You in Advance for every idea.I think, from your example, if you maintain condition record with the combination of Destination Region Code and Material, it will work, provided, your freight condition type has Calculation Type as "C".
So your condition record would be
100001 / 20 = 1USD per PC
G. Lakshmipathi -
Advice with Incomplete procedure for Freight Condition re.Certain incoterms
Hi
I need some advice on how to create an Incomplete procedure for a specfic freight accrual.
BUT i only require it to be incomplete for certain Incoterms ........
For example i have not entered freight condition record, and the customers incoterm is CIF, - i wish for this sales order to be flagged as incomplete
However for a different sales order I have not entered a freight condition record, and the customers' incoterm is EXW, - I wish for this order to be clased as OK and Complete, as a Freight accrual is not required against EXW incoterm orders
Has anyone come across this problem before ? - if so how have they rectified this ?
Any help/ advice would be much appreciated
TonyHi,
You can just write a routine with the help of abaper in VOFM.
And assign that routine in requirement field in the pricing procedure for that condition type.
To create a new routine in VOFM please go through the belo wlink.
http://saptechsolutions.com/pdf/VOFMCopyRequirementRoutines.pdf
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O -
Issues with Freight delivery charges when the PO is partially received
We are having issues allocating charges for inventory valuation as well as rolling up total freight for payable invoices. We will receive partial POu2019s (via inbound delivery) with related freight for that portion. Then a couple of weeks later we will receive another segment of the PO (via inbound delivery) with more freight on it. It would be ideal if the inbound deliveries allowed us to allocate freight on the document similar to how we do with outbound deliveries but that does not appear to be an option.
Using the freight Condition at header level works great only when when the PO is full received, on partial GR's it should exist an additional solution for it.
Once the user process the first Goods Receipts, the header condition become blocked or it is gray out (It doesn't allow changes to add more freight to cover the Items we haven't receive.
Any help will be highly appreciated.Hi,
We can handle this using unplanned delivery costs at the time of invoice.
You can opt for GR based invoice verification.With this we can enter invoice for each goods receipt.When we enter invoice for a partial GR quantity the frieght amount portion that is mentioned in the PO is automatically captured for that perticular portion of inventory.For the subsequent receipts if there is any additional frieght than the planned delivery cost, that can be provided as unplanned delivery cost in the invoice for the perticular portion of inventory.
Regards,
Ramabhupala Reddy -
Goods issue from vendor consignment stock with freight charge
Hi Experts,
I have a typical scenario for GI from consignment stock with freight charge.
The consigment price is agreed of the material is agreed between the vendor and the client. The vendor buy the material and use the company/client shipment.The client carry the vendor material in their shipping. The fright charges was not included in the consignment price. Presently they accumulated the vendor frieght charge in a separate account.
When the user raise a reservation and goods issue was done from consignment stock Info record price of material for the consignment + 8% of the price of material should be charge to the user.
And the 8% of info record price of the consignment material should be posted to freight recovery account.
So there is no balance between the freight charges account and the freight recovery account.
Can you suggest who we can mapped this process?
Regards
DPHi DP,
As SAP doesn't Support Delivery cost settlement with the consignment process to seprate G/L ( Similar to accruals ), you need to go for Z development which while posting MRKO will be executed with refernce to PO & Issue Document Posting the freight Value to Appropriate fright G/L .
Regards
Manish
Edited by: Manish Kumar on Nov 3, 2010 12:06 PM -
I have an issue with pricing condition ZPRO (basic price )
Hello gurus
I have an issue with pricing condition ZPRO (basic price ).
users created a sales order, and the basic price ZPRO which is mannual is added twice ,now i want to put a check so that condition tpye zpro is not accepted twice by the system. please let me know how can i restrict system from accepting condition type zpro twice during sales order.
regds
Edited by: sapuser09 on Jul 26, 2011 8:44 AMHi,
Solution for this is very simple. Don't make any changes to the sales order user exit. Use condition exclusion for the condition type.
Do customization in the following path of IMG
Sales and distribution---- > Basic Functions--- > Pricing--
> Condition exclusion -- > Condition exclusion for groups of conditions
First In Define condition exclusion groups you have to define condition exclusion group (ZXXX)
Then in Assign condition types to the exclusion groups you have to assign condition type to the exclusion group (ZXXX ZPRO)
Then in Maintain Condition exclusion for pricing procedures select the pricing procedure where you have the problem and click Exclusion box present in Dialog structure box
You will be faced with Change view exclusion overview screen Click new entries
You will be faced with New entries overview of added entries screen.
Take serial no as 10 Condition exclusion procedure as B (Best condition with in condition type) In the exclusion group1 add the exclusion group ZXXX.
Save it and create order.
In the order pricing you will again observe that ZPRO appearing twice but only one will be active.
Changing user exit for this issue is not at all required and it must be only the last resort Try replicating the issue in your sand box system. As I had mentioned it will be picked twice but only one will be active.
Hope this helps.
Edited by: mokirala tilak on Aug 10, 2011 10:19 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
Using Adobe CS2 with mc book pro intel duo core 2,16 .17"
As a designer working on high definition heavy graphic files intended for digital printing, i am about to go for mc book pro 2,16 duo core and 2gb ram. I need to use CS2 (photoshop, illustrator) and know that it is not a native soft version, so not o
-
This is new as of a few days ago. I can't find anything in preferences to make it better nor did I change any setting. Not sure what's going on. The computer seems to be working fine except for that.
-
How to install AdobeFnt07.lst and use it with Illustrator
Hello, I received font files to make a work, in this pack there are some files called with the name and type of font (like DIN Short, DINBla, DINBlaIta, DINBol, ... ) and one file called AdobeFnt07.lst. Could you tell me how I can install this font's
-
Hi All, I have been told by one of my friends that all their text messages to me keep bouncing back. I don't want them blocked, I haved checked my firewall and it says 0 messages blocked. I have turned my phone completely off and I have deleted thi
-
I have a new iPhone 4 which I cannot sync until I upgrade to the latest version of iTunes software (version 10.2.2). Upon trying to upgrade, I keep receiving a message which states, "The URL could not be opened." Anyone else had the same problem &