Issue with PCR to restrict absence quota

Hi Experts.
i have a requirement where the absence quota should never be over 24 at any particular time.
for this absence 24 leaves per annum with 2 leaves accumulate monthly.
we are using -ve time mgt and written a PCR to restrict absence to 24 by using Time type
VARSTLDYPP
N
Y
HRS=FR55C
HRS?24
<
HRS-24
HRS*-1
HRS?2
HRS=2
ADDDBXXXX
<
ADDDBXXXX
now the issue is when i run the simulation of time evaluation it is generating 2 leaves per year instead of
2 per month. can anybody help me solve the issue
Thanks & Regards
ramayya

I need a PCR for the below scenario.  I created two types to store day balance and max entitlement to 25 days.   We are not processing payroll from SAP.   Any help writing PCR  with details would be appreciated.
Schema we are copying TM04
Time types - storing  daily balance one for below 60 days &  one for after 60 days planned working time.
Vacation per calendar year 25 days not based on seniority.
Scenario:
2.       Prorated entitlement for employees who will work fewer than 60 work days for company in a given year are calculated as follows:
a.     1/12 of annual vacation for every 21 days s/he performs work
b.    For these purposes (60 days worked rule) the following is also considered as work performance: Planned working time from IT0007 and public holidays. 
c.     e.g. if hired on Nov 11, 2011, there < 60 wd remaining. They get 1/12 (25/12 = 2.1d) for every 21 work days remaining - in this case 2 periods of 21 wd, since RIM days and holidays are included as work days, for a total of 4.5 days (round up to half-day).
3.       Prorated entitlement for employees who will work 60 or more work days for RIM in a given year are calculated as follows:
a.     1/12th of annual entitlement for every calendar month of completed work
b.    E.g. If George is hired on July 15 2011, he gets 10.5 days of vacation entitlement.
c.     The number of full months George will have worked by the end of the calendar year is five u2013 Aug to Dec incl. George gets no entitlement from the 16 days from July 15 to July 31st.
5 / 12 * 25 days = 10.4 days, rounded up to 10.5 days.
Thanks,
Mani.
Edited by: saphrtime on Apr 21, 2011 5:19 PM
Edited by: saphrtime on Apr 21, 2011 5:21 PM

Similar Messages

  • Issue with PTO (Paid Time Off) quota generation

    Hi All,
    We have an issue with quota generation of PTO for our employees.
    The issue goes like this:
    We have a Paid time off for employees 5weeks( 200 hrs) for employees who have worked less than 5 years.
    we have  paid time off for employees 6 weeks ( 240 hrs) for employees who have worked more than 5 years.
    we have the following logic that has to go in this config:
    -- Our fiscal year starts on Feb 1st and ends on Jan end or Feb starts which has a full week of working days. ( ex: if 01/31/2012 falls on a Thursday the following Monday which has full 5 day working week would be the end of the fiscal year).
    -- Depending on the working hours of  the employees and the date of joining for the first year ( for new hires)0041 info type the eligibility gets varied and reduced. Ex( employees who joins on start of fiscal year and works 40hrs per week schedules is eligible for 200hrs of PTO. Employees who join in the month of august and works for 35 hrs per week ( i.e mid of fiscal year) would get 91 hrs of PTO.
    I need to put this in the system. I am thinking this could be done with out tweaking PCR.I need help in configuring this in Absence quotas as to what are the things i need change in system config and how do i do it. Please help with some screen shots if possible.  I really need this to get it done ASAP. Looking forward for help.
    Thanks,
    Chowdary.

    We use TM00 schema. Can i call TS15 and TS 12  rules into TM00 acheieve my issue of quota entilements?
    Iam doing this because my businees needs to see if an employee chages his work schedule from 40 to 30 or 20 etc.. the PTO has to vary accordingly.
    As the minimum eligibility is to work for 20 hrs to avail the PTO days. If at any point the employee drops it under 20 he will not be eligible till he work any this >= 20hrs per month so the evaluation has to check periodically to update the quota availability.... I need help plz suggest ...

  • Issue with AD users restricted to certain machines.

    Hi all,
    So, we seem to have a bit of an issue with user accounts that are restricted to logging in to certain machines only. While the user is permitted to log in to the machine (Windows lets them), our ISE server denies the login and the trace looks like this:
    24430 Authenticating user against Active Directory
    24441 Account not permitted to log on using the current workstation
    22057 The advanced option that is configured for a failed authentication request is used
    22061 The 'Reject' advanced option is configured in case of a failed authentication request
    11823 EAP-MSCHAP authentication attempt failed
    12305 Prepared EAP-Request with another PEAP challenge
    11006 Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    5411 No response received during 120 seconds on last EAP message sent to the client
    Has anyone seen this?
    Version 1.1.1.268.
    Thanks!
    -Ryan

    Well, as soon as I posted this, the idea hit me.
    We added the two ISE servers' machine accounts in AD to the machines that this user is permitted to log in to, and it works like a charm now. Apparently when a user logs in, ISE passes through a generic machine name (of itself) to AD, and it wasn't matching the list of allowed machines.

  • Issue with production order linked to quote instead of sales order

    Hi Gurus,
    I did a lot of digging through SAP notes and accross the internet. Before I contact SAP, just wanted to give a shot @ SDN. Please help.
    Background- for ATO (VC assemble to Order):
    i) Created a quote
    ii) Created a sales order with reference to a quote
    iii) MRP created a planned order and the planned order is linked to the quote
    iV) Production order created and it is also linked to a quote
    v) All reports, MD04/COOIS shows that the plnd order/prd order is linked to the quote
    My issue - print a shop paper or a customer specific product ID label....guess what 'it prints the quote number everywhere'.
    Everything is tied to a quote - which is not a real demand. All purchase orders are tied to the quote. THIS IS STUPID.
    I refered to SAP Notes - 181685 and 459734. But I need details of what config settings I should do and where?
    I'm a pure PP guy, getting into SD requirement type & account assignement settings. Please help me with details.
    http://scn.sap.com/message/8018953#8018953
    This guy also had the same problem and his issue was never resolved.
    Thanks,

    Hello
    Take a look on the following note where this scenario is described:
    16658 - Generate sales order stock based on quotation
    The note proposes the following setting as a workaround to this issue:
    "As of 3.0, when the requirements type is assigned to the transaction
    during requirements type determination, it is possible to assign a
    requirements type to the quotation that does not represent make-to-order
    production."
    Therefore, please check your customizing settings and make sure that a requirement class/type (transactions OVZG and OVZI) without MTO is assigned to the quotation item category (transaction OVZI).
    On transaction OVZI, there is a field called "Origin of requirement type in requirement type determination". Please take a look on the information provided on the F1 help of this field:
    ========================================================================
    Origin of requirement type in requirement type determination
    In the standard release, the requirements type is determined according
    to a certain search strategy depending on the strategy group of the
    material.
    In this field you can select an alternative search strategy (source):
    Source 0 = Material master strategy, then item category and MRP type
    Source 1 = Item type and MRP type strategy
    Source 2 = Item type and MRP type strategy (as for source 1) with
    additional check of the allowed requirements type
    ========================================================================
    Therefore, my suggestion is to set this field to 1 for the quotation item category and assign an MTS requirement type on OVZI.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Absence quota generation with PCR in Time Evaluation

    Dear All,
    I am generation absence quota Annual leave = 50 through PT60- ZM04. Its daily calculation and transfered at the month end.
    The quota entitlement is 30 days per year.
    I have written this pcr. Have configured a time type too. but not sure why its not generating any quota.
    The time type I have configured is:
    Time Type: 0097
    Save as day balance - No Formation
    Save as period balance - 1
    Store for time accounts - 1
    Have assigned the time type 0097 in Base entitlement for Absence quota generation as Day Balance and even in generation rules.
    Have placed the PCR with ACTIO Z003 before CUMBT fucntion.
    The PCR Z003 is:
    000010 D HRS?0
    000020 *
    000030 = D OUTAQTYP
    000040 = **
    000050 = 50 Z GCY ZQTY
    PCR ZQTY is:
    000010 D OUTWPMOLGA
    000020 **
    000030 99 HRS=FR50C ADDDB0097Z ADDDB0097 HRS=D0097
    I didnt mention anywhere in configuration or PCR that its 30 days per year.
    Do I need to do this?
    Have I missed out anything, please help me.
    Thanks & regards,
    Majid

    Hi,
    This you can do through config also without using PCR.
    Base entitlement is 30 for calender year. Selection rule- Accrual period is daily and transfer time is time evaluation period.
    Use appropriate rounding rule in selection rule.
    Rgds,
    Lata

  • Issue in Absence Quota generation wrt to actions (IT0000);using schema TQTA

    Hi
    I wanted some clarification on Absence Quota generation through schema-u201CTQTAu201D
    The client Scenario is that they want Earned leaves (absence Quota type 0002 and 0003) and Half-Pay leave (Absence Quota 0004) semi-annually.
    Whenever an action is run (whether with employee status active or inactive) the absence quota is generated twice:
    1.     Last day of previous action
    2.     Last day of evaluation period.
    Main issue is that when it is reflected in IT-2006 it is summing up the quota generated on both the above said dates.
    Also the quota that is generated on the last day of the evaluation period is not prorated but for the entire accrual period.
    When the employment status of an action is inactive; the quota is generated upto the last date of previous active action, but if any other action is executed with employee status as u201Cactiveu201D in the same accrual period and time evaluation is run; the quota gets generated again on the last date of accrual period for the entire accrual period i.e. the inactive period is also taken into consideration. Moreover, both the quota generated are added up and displayed in IT-2006.
    Kindly advice me the solution for the same.
    Thanks and Regards
    Parul Jain

    Hi
    I wanted some clarification on Absence Quota generation through schema-u201CTQTAu201D
    The client Scenario is that they want Earned leaves (absence Quota type 0002 and 0003) and Half-Pay leave (Absence Quota 0004) semi-annually.
    Whenever an action is run (whether with employee status active or inactive) the absence quota is generated twice:
    1.     Last day of previous action
    2.     Last day of evaluation period.
    Main issue is that when it is reflected in IT-2006 it is summing up the quota generated on both the above said dates.
    Also the quota that is generated on the last day of the evaluation period is not prorated but for the entire accrual period.
    When the employment status of an action is inactive; the quota is generated upto the last date of previous active action, but if any other action is executed with employee status as u201Cactiveu201D in the same accrual period and time evaluation is run; the quota gets generated again on the last date of accrual period for the entire accrual period i.e. the inactive period is also taken into consideration. Moreover, both the quota generated are added up and displayed in IT-2006.
    Kindly advice me the solution for the same.
    Thanks and Regards
    Parul Jain

  • Issue while creating Absence Quota for one employee

    Hi Friends,
    Our customer has a weird issue. When time evaluation is run, One Absence Quota type (Leave in Bank) is not getting generated for Only One Employee.
    This leave type has been updated with quota in IT 2006 after running PT60 for all other employees in the PA. The issue is only with one employee.
    This absence quota is assigned "Increase" in table V_556A_B (Permit Generation of Quotas in Time Evaluation)
    Can any one please suggest how to generate the missing quota for this employee. Thank you !!

    Hi
    Thanks for your replies !!
    Please find the screenshots attached.
    Leave in Bank Absence type which is valid for 2014 is missing in IT 2006 instead This absence quota valid upto 31.12.9999 is present.
    Current requirement is to remove the quota which is valid upto 31.12.9999 and replace the quota which is valid upto 31.12.2014.
    I have checked for some PERNRs with same EG/ESG/PA/PSA combination. They have the absence quota valid upto 31.12.2014 Only.

  • How to change generation date of absence quota with Time Evaluation methos

    Hi all,
    IS there any way to change generation date when TIme Evulation generate absence quota?
    Currently system will use last day of month as generation date, Validity and Duduction period set correctly.
    Base entitlement relate with Monthly,
    Accrual period setting in selection rule is Month
    Example: system generation absence quota in PT60 with 1 day Normal Leave Entry date 31.06.2011
    Valid from 01.06.2011 to 31.12.2012 ; Deduction from 01.06.2011 to 29.02.2012 (extras 2 month)
    Can we change ENtry date to 28.06.2011 , because in the last day of month they did not yet have quota but they need it for advance (approver from his/her Manager) ...
    Thanks,
    R1V

    Hi,
    The best way i think is to have negative deductions for the quota.
    This time as it is on 28 you want to push it to 2 days earlier and later if there is another person with a day as 25, you need to again change the generation date isnt it.
    Instead, if you have the negative deductions, you need not worry about the generation date.
    Hope this helps.
    Cheers,
    LG

  • How to Update Absence Quota with Time Evaluation

    Dear Friends,
    I would like to know how do we update absence quota within time evaluation. Currently i'm using UPDTQAXX, it works but when i search this forum everybody was using this simple code:
    HRS=something
    ADDDBxxxx
    and the quota is updated. I just dont get it, with adddb its only update the daily balance table, how does that enable us to updated the 2006 infotype? Many Thanks

    ADDDBxxxx adds the value of the number of hours field to the specified time type in the table of day balances (TES), it does not update the quota.
    You can use function QUOTA  to accrue absence entitlements periodically based on this customizing: Personnel Time Management>Time Data Recording and Administration>Managing Time
    Accounts Using Attendance/Absence Quotas>Calculating Absence Entitlements>Rules for
    Generating Absence Quotas>Define Generation Rules for Quota Selection.  
    You can use a time type to prorate that accrual

  • Using "Restrict by app" in change query causes issues with Search Results

    Hello!
    I am hoping some experienced SP admin can help me out. I am having issues with the relevance ranking for my search results web part.
    I created a Wiki (OOTB) within a site collection and on the home page of the Wiki I was looking to apply a Search Box and Search Results web part for easy searching. I wanted to ensure the search results were restricted to the scope of the pages within the
    wiki. I did the following after adding the 2 web parts:
    Entered edit mode for the page
    Started to edit the Search Results web part
    Under Properties for Search Results clicked on "Change Query"
    Navigated to BASICS and clicked "Switch to Quick Mode"
    For Select Query, picked "Wiki (System)" option
    For Restrict by app, picked "Specify a URL" and input the wiki URL "http://webapp.com/sites/sitecollection/wiki"
    Click OK
    The web part has 6 automatic results when I hit the page. These are the only 6 pages in my wiki. When I search a word or title of a page, they are not ranked in order or relevance. The ordering is static to what was being shown before the search, but the
    keywords I'm searching are bold. With out the taking the steps above, I can easily search these pages and have them ranked appropriately so I'm not too sure what I'm doing wrong. 
    Other Details
    The pages have been crawled and can be searched from anywhere else in SP.
    I am only a site collection admin for this specific site collection.
    I other than the steps above, I have not made any changes or customization to the search web parts; they are both out of the box SP.
    The SP Farm admin we unable to pin point what the root cause is either.

    Hi Mikael,
    Sorry for the wait, I was unable to post pictures, which i felt would better describe my issue.
    Could you output the query template you are ending up with?
    If you can tell me how to accomplish this, then I can provide it. Please keep in mind that I am only a site collection admin.
    Also, is the ranking/sorting for your webpart set to ranking?
    When looking at the web part settings, I didn't see an option to modify the ranking. Unfortunately, some sites in my intranet are down now so I can't even double check. Once it's back up, I will verify this as well.
    And how do you know they are ranked incorrectly?
    I wanted to display an image showing what I meant by this. As the wiki is down, I'll do my best with words. When I visit the wiki home page, I already have the search and search results web parts there. Without searching anything, the search results
    web part displays 6 pages that are available in the wiki. When I search, I expect to see the most relevant result at the top. similar to the following: 
    *Search result from another section of the intranet site.*
    What I receive instead is the same list of wiki pages, in the same order. The most relevant result
    is not moved to the top like in the image above, but I can see that the word "rush" is highlighted in bold. I hope this helps.
    If you need more of a description, please let me know.
    Thank you

  • Use of Time Evaluation to generate Absence Quota

    Hi,
    We are planning to use time evaluation to generate absence quota. At the moment we are using RPTQTA00 report to generate Absence Quota. We have negative time management and since, the project has already gone live i have very limited scope to change the basic settings for example we do not have any employee subgroup to identify part time employees, PT & FT are in one employee sub-groups. We have only one ESG & PSG for time recording, time quota etc. The base entitlement is defined for the FT employees and it is reduced propertionately based on the employement percentage in IT0007. Now we are going to adopt a change in design, and planning to have specific work-schedule for PT employees. In that case, we will not have the scope to maintain %age in IT0007 for part time employees but exact no of working hours will be used. It means that system will treat the PT emploees as FT while generating absence quota and output the FT absence entitlement. As i said earlier we can not differentiate PT employees from FT employees based on ESG or PSG, i can not create a separate quota selection rule for part time employees. Hence, we are moving from running RPTQTA00 report to time evaluation for absence quota generation purpose.
    Now can anybody please help finding a alternate solution for the above, if it is possible to do it through report RPTQTA00 or we have to adopt the time evaluation. In case we are going to generate absence quota through time evaluation, can we only generate absence quota and skip anything that is related to payroll.
    Any comments/suggestion/advise will be very helpful to us.
    Thanks.
    Sujit

    We are not able to generate absence quota for part-time employees as when we do that, system is treating PT employees as FT employees and the FT base entitlement is referred while calculating absence quota. i can not define separate absence entitlement for PT employees as we have only one ESG and PSG, and based on this quota selection group is defined. The QUOMO feature is defined based on work contract - employee sub-group (there is no separate emp sub-group for PT employees) - Pay Scale Group. We are having this problem as we have specific work schedule for PT employees now (Ex. we create 3 days work schedule with 15 hours: 4.5,4.5, 6 hours) and we are not maintaining employement percentage for them. So system is treating PT employee as FT employee with 100% employement percentage. Please let me know if you need any specific info to understand my issue.
    Thank you so much for the response.

  • Absence quota prorate by monthly basis

    Hi Experts,
    I have an issue regarding the absence quota for the new joiner or leaver. My client wants the leave earned to be given upon completion of the month. My current configuration is base on calendar days.
    For example, when a new joiner join the company at 2nd or mid of the month then the leave entitlement will be given for the following month. That mean when an employee join at 3rd or any other days in January 2010, the leave will be prorated starting from February. This same to the leaver, if the employee is leaving the company at 3rd or any other days in April, then the leave will be prorate till March. The entire April will not be take into account.
    My question is how can I configure this scenario?
    Appreciate the input.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    If you are not using TE then you will can always write an ABAP program which will run and load data on the first of every month.
    For Hire:
    The program can check the hire date from IT 0041. If the hire date is less than the first of previous month then you can add the monthly entitlement to the absense quote in IT 2006. If it is in the middle of the previous month then you can prorate according to the formula and then add to the monthly entitlement to the absense quota in IT 2006.
    For Termination:
    You can base the above logic with the termination date in the IT 0041
    If you maintain IT 0041 well and good or else you will have to base it on IT 0000 Actions infotype.
    Hope this helps.
    Ajay

  • Prorate absence Quota monthly based on number of days worked.

    Hi All,
    I need to Generate Absence Quota Prorated Monthly on the following criteria.
    4.5 days Per month.
    0 - 5 day = 0.5
    6-10 days = 1.5days
    11- 15 days = 2.5 days
    16-20days = 3 days
    21 - 25 = 3.5 days
    26 and above = 4.5 days
    54 Quota Yearly entitlement
    Negative Time evaluation -
    Time evaluation run at end of the month.
    If use Base Entilement as .15 / days and daily accural in Table T559L ,
    then without any PCR quota is generated but for 31 days it generates 4.65 days and people joining middle of the month is not as per the criteria mentioned above ie as per number of day worked.
    Can any one guide me with the steps and PCR's required if any.
    Thanks
    Sethu

    Hi Dinesh,
    Thanks for your response. I have already created and  assigned it in T559L. The below is the Rounding rule.
    Lower inc     Upper     Target     Rollout
    0.00000 X     0.75000      0.15000 X
    0.90000 X     1.50000      1.50000 X
    1.65000 X     2.25000      2.50000 X
    2.40000 X     3.00000      3.00000 X
    3.90000 X     4.65000      4.50000 X
    As per my earlier thread description when i make it daily accural and assign this rounding rule then for 31 days it calculates 4.65 days and for people joining middle or last week of the month it is not prorating as per the requirement,
    Thanks
    Sethu

  • Time Management - Work Schedule /Absence Quota / Part-time quota generation

    Hi Experts,
    Need your help!
    We have a requirement where we need to create distinct work schedules for each irregular / part-time work pattern and the number of work patterns we have identified is more than 1000.  We are using report RPTQTA00 to generate quota. We have used work contract, employee sub-group & employee payscale group in the QUOMO feature to get the base entitlement picked up. We have defined base entitlement for the full time workschedules with 37.0 / 38.5 hours and there is a reduction rule which reduce the absence entitlement for part time employees as per the employement percentage in IT0007. Now we have a scenario where we have created a work schedule with different no of hours for each day of week (M-4, T-6, W-4, TH-6, F-4, S-OFF, SU - OFF); this work schedule is treated as full time work pattern by the system and quota is generated as full time work schedule refering to the QUOMO settings, but as per my client employees with this work schedule have reduced hours of working hours (24 hours, not 37.0 or 38.5 hours)and hence it should be treated as part-time employees, and the quota generated should be proportionately reduced. I have very limited scope to create any ESG or PSG as we do not have any distinct emplyee sub-groups maintained for full-time and part-time employees and the project has already gone-live with payroll/time. It is worth mentioning over here that we are recording absence through ESS and it takes into account the daily planned working time maintained in IT0007, so we are very particular to keep it as accurate as possible.
    I would really appreciate if somebody can please suggest any possible solution for the above issue, or guide me on what would be the best way to tackle it. I can give more details in case anybody need to have a better understanding of the issue to suggest a solution.
    Thanks in advance
    Sujit

    Hi Kathy,
    Yes, i have found the solution to it. I do not know whether it will fit into your situation or not, but i got two solutions for my issue mentioned above, please check it may help:
    1) To use capacity utilization field in IT0008 to get the FTE hours and defining the reduction rule of absence quota based on the capacity utilazation percentage.
    2) There are three user exits available in the standard report RPTQTA00, i have used one of them to write my own rules for the calculations (deduction rule)
    Do let me know if i can help you in any respect. Thanks.
    Regards,
    Sujit

  • Absences not deducted from Absence Quota for One Employee

    Dear Friends,
    I am facing an issue for one employee, when I recorded an Annual Leave absence to him, it is not updated in his Absence quotas infotype. But this is working fine for all other employees in the same employee group/subgroup grouping.
    But for Sick Leave absence type, it is updating in his absence quota records...
    I have checked the counting rules, deduction rules, base entitlement rules and other configuration settings.......It is fine and for other employees belonging to the same grouping, it is working fine, except this employee...
    I couldn't understand what will be the reason? Can anyone shed light on this issue?
    Thanks in advance,
    Sai Narayana,
    SAP Functional Consultant.

    Hi JS,
    I am checking the absence is deducted or not from his entitlement in the infotype 2006 after running the payroll for that month......
    The employee has taken leave on last month and the payroll is also run for that month.......This Absence is not deducted from his quota......
    I have checked for another employee in this department, no error/issue with that employee.......Only with this employee I am facing problem.....
    I found -
    1. The Absence Quota balance which is present in Infotype 2006 is not the same which is displayed in Remuneration Statement ( leave balance is displayed in payslip for every employee)
    2. Annual leave is not deducted from the employee's entitlement where as sick leave is deducted. I have checked the deduction rule too for this grouping, it is right.No issues in that.
    3. Absence Quota generation also produced different results when run time evaluation thru PT60.....which is not according to the entitlement to this employee grouping that too for this employee only.
    Or Friend, can you tell me some other option, to overcome this issue.....instead of repairing this all the time.......
    Thanks,
    Sai

Maybe you are looking for

  • From a PDF in a browser window - open links within in that PDF in a new window

    BACKGROUND SCENARIO: Users view a PDF document within their browser window (default behavior at my organization).  Key point is, the PDF isn't being viewed in an Acrobat Reader window, it's being viewed within the browser window. Within that PDF, are

  • Ora-1460 during select using table(cast(type))

    Hi all! I've got a problem with a query that fails with a ora-1460 at random time intervals. This is a 10.2.0.3 version database running on a sun os. We've managed to reproduce this error controlled when running an analyze on the table in question at

  • FireWire conflict

    I just got a new LaCie external 3TB hard drive connected to my Mac Pro via FireWire 800. I started using it as a secondary Time Machine backup drive, but when Time Machine is backing up to it, I cannot use my iSight camera with Messages. I am still u

  • Status bar help?

    i'm trying to create my first java application. my question is, is there any class that i can use to create a status bar or how do i create one if theres none?

  • ML currencies missing in the MLBECR for the EKBE

    Hello, While trying to do GR for PO line item, I am getting the below mentioned error, please advice if I am missing some setting, Error Message: "ML currencies missing in the MLBECR for the EKBE-2" Note: In 2008 I was able to post the material docum