Item not assign in standard liquidity planner

Hello to you all.
I am using liquidity planner in the standard way without any developing.
Once I used Tcode FLQQD7 - Test Query to check my setting of the Assignment from Invoices, the document was assign to the correct item.
Once I used Tcode FLQAD - From Invoices to actual assign it,  I was surprised that the system couldn't find the document at all.
I will appreciate your advise.
Amir

probably this Document is not present in LP tables(FLQITEM*) as it does not have an actual account Line.
So FLQAD doesnot capture this Document.
Let me explain with an example how the assignment program FLQAC and FLQQC7 works,
Assume Liquidity item for Info be assigned through query as Q1.
Doc1
Actual account : 100
Info account   : 100-
Now when you run FLQQC7 for this Doc,then you will notice 2 Lines for same Doc with no Liquidity item for the Line item with actual account and Liquidity item Q1 being assigned for the Line item with info  account.FLQQC7 just projects the LI assigned for the account in the Doc.
Now when you run FLQAC for the same Doc,then the amount 100 will be assigned to the Liquidity item Q1.You will notice only 1 Line. This implies that the amount from actual account is ASSIGNED to the LI Q1.
Now if have cleared the Info line in Doc1 with another Doc,for eg, Doc2,
Info account :100
Info account1:100-
Then FLQAC will have assigned the  amount 100 to LI for the info account1.
This implies that the amount from actual account is assigned the info account1.
And you should use the FLQQC7 to info account1 and check it is the same LI as FLQAC and not for the info account1 in Doc1. This is how FLQQC7 should be used.
But in your case you have marked the gl accounts as actual and also as Info through query.
When you run FLQQC7 and FLQAC for the Doc with such accounts, for Eg:
Actual1 : 100
Acutal2 : 100-
This Doc is just a Bank transfer Doc. So when you run FLQAC for such Docs,you will notice the amounts assigned to transfer LI assigned in FLQC2.
But when you FLQQC7(Note that both the Docs are assigned a LI in query), you will notice that the LI assigned in query is assigned to those accounts in Query.
To test query assignment is working correctly,I would suggest you to post a Doc as the First example.
And assign LI through query for the Info account only.Then RUN FLQQC7 for the info account in the Doc.
Then Run FLQAC for the same Doc.The assignment program should also have assigned the same LI as in FLQQC7.
If so then query assignment is working fine.
Also I would suggest you to read the note 412605 on how the Liquidity planner should be used.
Kind Regards
davide

Similar Messages

  • Impact of GL's when not assigned to FSV.  Where they will be adjusted?

    Dear SAP Guru's,
    When we take a trial balance through F.01 using a financial statement version which contains some gl accounts which are not assigned to that FSV but contain some balance, the trial balance which is derived is showing a tallied balance sheet.  Upon further investigation we found that the same is adjusted under the head "Reverses and surplus - Balance in profit and loss account"
    Is it SAP standard. If yes any note is available on this?
    Please guide me.
    Regards,
    Anand.Inguva

    Dear Anand.Inguva,
    According to [help.sap.com- Special Financial Statement Items node |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/96/8b3c2d43ce11d189ee0000e81ddfac/frameset.htm] :
    "The balance sheet net result and the P&L statement result are calculated by the program that creates the financial statements. This program also lists, under the item Not assigned, those accounts that could not be assigned to an item in the financial statement version.
    The financial statement profit or loss is determined from only those accounts assigned to assets or liabilities. The accounts for the items Financial Statement Notes or Not Assigned are not considered either in the calculation of the retained earnings/net loss or for the P&L result. The balance of all the other accounts produces the P&L statement result."
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Milen.

  • Liquidity Planner (queries)

    Hi,
    I am working in a roll out of liquidity Planner (liquidity calculation). There is already a company in the country which is the one that I have to take as a reference. My question is about queries (TS FLQCC1 and FLQQD1); I can see that the reference company has the queries which I need already created (they are created for the company and not global for the country). I am thinking of changing these queries as global for country (without an specific company) and then assign them to an specific secuency query for the company (TS FLQQC5 and FLQQD5).
    My question is if these changes can generate any problem for the document chains and if the perfomance could be worse?
    In addition I want to ask which is better or more usually: to define queries for a company or  global for a country? 
    Thanks,
    Cecilia

    Hi Cecilia,
    I would like to clarify certain things though i am not an expert in Liquidity Planner.
    By reference company, do you mean that you want the functionality like them or something else? I do not know for the country though, but liquidity forecast for the treasurers should be interestd only for their company. And country , even if it is possible, should be mich more performance intensive.
    Please correct me if i interpreted the question erroneously.
    Best regards!
    Sandip

  • Liquidity Planner - Liquidity Item Re-assignment

    Hello Experts
    My question is regarding Liquidity Planner.
    We have offsetting items being allocated to Liquidity Item IN-TFR-000(unallocated payments).
    For example clearing document 10018475 line item 1 reports +4375.00 for Liquidity item IN-TFR-000. The same clearing document 10018475 Line 2 will post -4375.00 for Liquidity item In-TFR-000.
    Both items are reported on the FLQ Line Items report.
    We need to exclude these items which have the same document number/ with zero totals from the Line items report. Note that liquidity item IN-TFR-000 also has other unallocated items to be reported.
    Can I re-assign these items to another liquidity item (e.g OT-OUT-999) via a program or user exit? I can only do this after the liquidity item has been assigned through FLQAB/ FLQAC/FLQAD.
    Also where to configure the user exit? Or do I use a program to call the manual assignment transaction FLQAM? 
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi ,
    It is possible to transfer the amount from one liquidity item to another liquidity item by using the transaction code FLQT1 .

  • Liquidity Planner- Redetermine Liquidity Items

    Hi,
    I have created my bank sub-accounts as Actual Accounts. I had missed creating a few accounts ( bank sub- accounts ) to be assigned as actual accounts. After a few entries had been posted I realised that these accounts had been missed and then created them as actual accounts.
    I have now run Transaction FLQAC and have found that for the documents that were posted before I have maintained the Actual Accounts,the system has not derived the Liquidity items .
    For example an entry has been made from the Main Bank Account to Bank -Sub Account.
    As the Actual account was not maintained for the Sub- Account at the time of initial posting.,the system has now an entry with INIT_TRANS, when I run FLQAC.
    Is there a way I can rectify this and ensure that INIT_TRANS becomes Zero ?
    Thanks and Regards.

    You need to use t.code FLQC10 to pull missed documents to liquidity planner and then run FLQAC/FLQAD.

  • Liquidity Planner - assignment logic!

    Hello,
    unfortunately I have several problems with the liquidity planner in SAP R/3. From my point of view i`ve done the whole customizing (default-settings, N:M, partially ..., assignment to the liquidity positions, settings for the online update, ...). Everything works fine but I am not able to reproduce the logic of the assignment programm. There are a lot of complex FI-documents which have several clearing documents and it`s almost impossible to check if the assignment programs (1st step: FI assignment / 2nd step: bill-assignment) is working in an acceptable way. Sometimes it looks like that the assignment-program allocate the values in a special way (also if there is an 1:1-assignment between the information-lines and the actual-lines (banc account, ...)).
    My questions:
    Which experience do you have made with this kind of functionality?
    How is your approach to make the assignment (which user-exits do you use, is it necessary to use enquiries, ...)?
    Do you know any reports which might be helpful to analyse the assignment logic (I`ve found the program "RFLQ_REXCHAIN2 -> this one is nice for one position but in case of complex documents it`s also not really helpful)?
    Do you have any documentation which is more helpful than the oss-notes?
    I would be really grateful for a feedback. Thx in advance.
    W
    Edited by: Werner Hörhager on Jun 24, 2010 5:49 PM

    Hello,
    unfortunately I have several problems with the liquidity planner in SAP R/3. From my point of view i`ve done the whole customizing (default-settings, N:M, partially ..., assignment to the liquidity positions, settings for the online update, ...). Everything works fine but I am not able to reproduce the logic of the assignment programm. There are a lot of complex FI-documents which have several clearing documents and it`s almost impossible to check if the assignment programs (1st step: FI assignment / 2nd step: bill-assignment) is working in an acceptable way. Sometimes it looks like that the assignment-program allocate the values in a special way (also if there is an 1:1-assignment between the information-lines and the actual-lines (banc account, ...)).
    My questions:
    Which experience do you have made with this kind of functionality?
    How is your approach to make the assignment (which user-exits do you use, is it necessary to use enquiries, ...)?
    Do you know any reports which might be helpful to analyse the assignment logic (I`ve found the program "RFLQ_REXCHAIN2 -> this one is nice for one position but in case of complex documents it`s also not really helpful)?
    Do you have any documentation which is more helpful than the oss-notes?
    I would be really grateful for a feedback. Thx in advance.
    W
    Edited by: Werner Hörhager on Jun 24, 2010 5:49 PM

  • Error Dummy items from Customizing have to be excluded @ Liquidity Planner

    Dear Experts,
    I want to try Liquidity Planner Calculation, using FLQAD,
    when in selection screen i aready insert :
    - Paying Company Code
    - 1st Derivation Step : Query Sequence
    - 1st Derivation Step : Exit Module
    - 2st Derivation Step : Buffer Item
    - 2st Derivation Step : Exit Module
    - Test Run
    - Detail List
    so when Execute / F8, i get error message "Dummy items from Customizing have to be excluded"
    please help me.
    thx you.

    You get this error if the liquidity items in FLQC2/FLQC13 and buffer item field of flqad selection screen are same.
    Buffer item refers to liquidity items assigned to vendor/customer recon accounts.
    To avoid this error donot use liquidity items from FLQC2/FLQC13 in FLQAD buffer item.

  • Getting error message in debug "Page contains page items/buttons which are not assigned to a region!"

    Hi,
    I created a form and when I submit, it goes through but there is no "success" or "failure" message on Apex. I tried debugging it and got this message:
    "Page contains page items/buttons which are not assigned to a region!"
    I looked at the page definition and it seems like everything is assigned to a region. Much appreciate your help.
    Thanks!

    For your message, the relevant branch needs "include process success message" to be checked - and a value in success/failure in your process.
    Check the submitting & landing page for items not in a region. Under the items section there may be items listed separate to those under specific regions.
    It's possible these are related, but not guaranteed.

  • Account assignment not possible - item not yet calculated

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    While creating the Shipment Cost Document I am receiving following error.
    Account assignment not possible - item not yet calculated
    Message no. VY081
    When I double click on the Item to enter the conditions the screen goes blank at the item level. Kindly let me know if there is anything missing.
    Thanks and Rgards,
    Shehryar

    Hi,
    Please check below config.
    LETransportationShipment CostsShipment Cost DocumentShipment Cost Types and Item Categories.
    Hope it helps you
    Rgds,
    Kris.

  • Acct assignment cat. of item not in user data; Inform system admin

    Hi all,
    We are on a SRM EBP 5.0 project and we are getting the following error when we try to create a purchase order from the purchasers login.
    "Acct assignment cat. of item not in user data; Inform system admin"
    The complete details of the screen shot are as follows:
    The following error text was processed in the system DS1 : Acct assignment cat. of item not in user data; Inform system admin.
    The error occurred on the application server lndnysap1_DS1_01 and in the work process 0 .
    The termination type was: TH_RES_FREE
    The ABAP call stack was:
    Form: ABORT_PO of program SAPLBBP_PO_UI_ITS
    Form: ADD_TO_MSG_LOG of program SAPLBBP_PO_UI_ITS
    Form: ADD_TO_MSG_LOG_MULTI of program SAPLBBP_PO_UI_ITS
    Form: SET_PRICING of program SAPLBBP_PO_UI_ITS
    Form: DETERMINE_EXTERNAL_SCREEN of program SAPLBBP_PO_UI_ITS
    Module: DETERMINE_EXTERNAL_SCREEN of program SAPLBBP_PO_UI_ITS
    We did the following steps :
    Created shopping cart- employer and WF triggered apprd. by manager.
    Purchaser did "Carry Out Sourcing ", and if we say "Create Purchase Order", the PO gets created with a information message that "Incomplete purchase order 11/1 is created "
    When we go to  "Process Purchase Order" for the completion of the same. If we see Follow-on documents "Purchase Order Held" occurs.
    In the tab Item Data details Pricing tab we get this error.
    Do any of the SRM gurus can suggest us what to do?
    In our admin logon it shows
    "Server for pricing is not running. Start Server"  occurs after every run of this process purchase order from the purchasers login, though our IPC is working fine.
    Will be of great help if somebody replies soon.
    Sincerely,
    Sridhar.

    Hi,
    IPC has to be configured.
    Please check the following threads :
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=211089&messageID=2714527
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=211089&messageID=2715019
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • EC-CS - FS Items that are not assigned to Consol Chart of Accounts

    There are many redundant FS Items that not assigned to Consol Chart of Accounts. Instead of identifying and deleting one by one, what is the fastest and best way to clean up?
    Thanks and Regards,
    B Lim

    Hi
    when you are in the beginning of the of the project you can generate the EC-CS FS Items out of the consolidation chart of accounts finance Financial statement.
    This saved for me a lot of work and i had to do it anyway because i take over from the periodic extract.
    Cheers
    Tim

  • Items in project report(query) are listed under the "not assigned" (column)

    Hi All,
    Items in project reports (query) are listed under the "not assigned" (column name) Why it is so ?
    Start query : project reports & ask for period April 2008 (Period from/to). .
    You will see items listed under  Not assigned WBS Element (column name)
    If you choose for a period of April until June 2008 then you see more items under u201Cnot assignedu201D .
    Items should be under Assigned (column name) & not under the Not assigned (column name )
    Any suggestions highly appreciable.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    How are you displaying the ITEM field in the BEx query designer? Is it displayed with "Key and Text"? If so and if the text is not loaded for this master, this may happen.
    Regards,
    Yogesh.

  • CK11N alert:"Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component"

    Hi,
         When I use CK11N, fill in all the necessary field, there will appear a alert.
          The detail as follows:
    Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component
    Message no. CK 334
    Diagnosis
    No cost component is assigned to costing item 00001.
    System Response
    The costs for the costing item are not shown.
    Procedure
    Go into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and check the assignment of cost elements to cost components.
           I have used KA03,KL03,CR03 to checked previous datas, but I find no errors?
    What is the problem?

    Hi,
    Use OKTZ to create cost component structure.
    Check for some of these settings also
    Configuration:
    Define costing sheets
    OKTZ create cost component structure
    OKK4 Define valuation variant
    OKKN Define cost variant
    Master Data:
    KP26 setup activity rates
    CR01 setup work centers
    MM01 setup material masters
    CS01 setup Bill of Materials
    CA01 setup routings
    Regards,
    Murali

  • CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

    Dear Members,
    The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
    System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
    In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
    I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
    Any help/clues?
    Regards
    Satya

    Hi,
    In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
    The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
    The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
    can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
    regards
    Waman

  • Internal Order Plan Line Items not appearing in KOBP

    Hi,
    I have entered internal order plan using transaction KPF6.  I can then see it in reports like S_ALR_87012993, S_ALR_87012996, etc.  In these reports, when I double-click on an item, it opens up another window which enables us to select order actual line items, order plan line items, etc.  Once I click on order plan line items, system automatically takes me to transaction KOBP and displays the line item.
    What is surprising is, instead of going thru all the above, if I directly execute transaction code KOBP, I do not see the plan line item.  I have seen a similar issue in another forum (link hereunder) and apparently the issue there was with planner profile.  In my case, I am sure I have entered plan and trying to retrieve the line item (using KOBP) with the same planner profile.
    Internal orders - Plan Line items are not uploading into SAP!!
    I have also checked that the authorization group assigned to the planner profile is blank and that is the authorization group my user ID is assigned to.
    Any thoughts!
    Thank you,
    Srikanth

    Hi Srikanth Tamma,
    After going through you thread, I have tried entire process in my system and it is working fine....
    I don't see any problem...
    Are you using BAPI or Excel Upload for your planning?
    Srikanth Munnaluri

Maybe you are looking for