Local channel request

I noticed that channel 98, 99, 20 (time warner channel numbers)is not in the lineup for the "local channel" selection in the Los Angeles region.  There are alot of mandarin speakers in this part of California.  There is a paid subscription for the mandarin package that is an extra $ per month,  i believe if you can have 20+ spanish local channels for free you can add these three channels.  Our area,  Diamond Bar is not set to launch Fios until may/june 09'   we will not even consider switching from Time Warner to Fios unless we get those channels.
Message Edited by fiosdude on 04-01-2009 02:04 AM

Hello All,
When I tried different instance of orgservice object in each thread I got following error:
{"Secure channel cannot be opened because security negotiation with the remote endpoint has failed. This may be due to absent or incorrectly specified EndpointIdentity in the EndpointAddress used to create the channel. Please verify the EndpointIdentity
specified or implied by the EndpointAddress correctly identifies the remote endpoint. "}
Inner Exception-The request for security token has invalid or malformed elements.
Dimaz, I am not using CrmServiceContext. I have created one test project and in that I am only using object of  IOrganizationService and also only execute method.
Scenario which I understood till now is if we have following two statements which has been used by all threads:
RetrieveAttributeRequest attributeRequest = new RetrieveAttributeRequest
                    EntityLogicalName =
                        EntityName,
                    LogicalName = optionlist.Key
                // Execute the request
                RetrieveAttributeResponse attributeResponse = (RetrieveAttributeResponse)crmDao.Orgservice.Execute(attributeRequest);
                ICollection<object> values = attributeResponse.Results.Values;
                OptionMetadataCollection op = null;
                foreach (PicklistAttributeMetadata lookupobj in values)
                    op = lookupobj.OptionSet.Options;
And if after creating request object in thread1 if pointer goes to thread 2 and perform some processing in thread 2 and them come back in thread 1,it doesn't have proper token values in Orgservice object and gives above error.
Please help me with this and also if anyone tried threading application before can I get sample code related to this. I am really stuck up on this very badly...:(

Similar Messages

  • Why does Verizon shuffle arond local channels?

    I have a question.
    Now, I currently have DirecTV but I've been thinking about getting Verizon FiOS when it is finally available in my area.  One thing though that I'm noticing about Verizon is they appear to be doing this same crazy practice that the local Cable Companies does... It drove me crazy all the time...  Basically, it is where they shift all the local channel numbers around so you have to keep stopping to think about where the channel has been moved to.
    For example in the Boston, the local terrestrial channels are like this.
    2(WGBH), 4(WWBZ), 5(WCVB), 7(WHDH), 11(PBS New Hampshire), 25(WFXT), ... 44(WGBX), 56(WLVI) 62, 68,etc. Simple enough.  Now thankfully DirecTV keeps this same pattern...
     However on Verizon for say the city of Belmont, MA (Zipcode "02476") the channel lineup is like this.. 38 comes in on 3. 25 comes in on 8. 56 jumps to 12...  etc.  No kind of normalcy basically....
    Why did Verizon do this????I see they already have channels going over 1000 so why didn't they vacate 0-99 nationally so the local channels can fall into their correct slot and then start the cable stations like say above channel 99???
    In having DirecTV, I've noticed the way that company gets around needing to shift all the local channels all over is they start all of their cable TV stations above channel 99.  This leaves 2-99 as open- so that the local channel can goto its correct allotment anywhere in the USA.  It just seems logical to leave the local channels in their true slot so I'm wondering what was soo appealing about this type of format where everything gets scattered all over.
    Does anyone have some idea of what I'm missing and perhaps if there's some kind of method to this madness-- which I've never quite understood?
    ~J. P.

    I'm glad I was able to reassure you, but I now think I went too far. Looking at your channel listings you provide, Verizon has some major problems to make it all line up. And looking in more detail at ours, it isn't as simple as I made it out to be.
    Verizon, IMO to their credit, has tried to standardize channel assignments for most everything around the country. Easier for them I suspect. Anyway, they start their SD cable channels at 50 in most places, I think; that means that UHF channels 50 and above must be relocated somewhere, and they do that, down into the low range. Here in Texas, some of the higher broadcast channels, but not all, are relocated - 27 to 7, 33 to 9, 39 to 10, etc, while 21 is on 21, 29 is on 29, etc.Verizon puts the local PEG cable channels at 30-47, then TV Guide at 48, and local weather at 49, then the real cable channels 50 and above. So all of the local broadcast channels that they carry are reloacated if necessary to below 30 here.
    The HD channels (the ones that do offer HD channels) do follow the scheme I mentioned, local + 500.
    When I made my statement earlier, I was really thinking of the "major" channels (ABC, CBS, FOX, PBS, etc), because those are pretty much the only local channels I watch, I forgot about all of the various smaller channels (religeous, Spanish language, etc) that they do carry. Sorry, I really didn't mean to make a mistake, I should have actually looked at the lineup first.
    Justin
    Verizon FiOS TV, Internet, and phone
    IMG 1.6.0, Build 06.89
    Keller, TX

  • New Local Move Request - Error: MapiExceptionLogonFailed: Unable to make connection to the server.

    I am in the process of doing a migration from SBS 2003 std. edition to SBS 2011 std. I am at the point the migrating mailboxes from the Exch 03 server to the Exch 2010 server.  I initially received an error when selecting mailboxes that the mailbox
    db on the Exch03 server did not exist.  I followed the resolution steps from another forum post to add the Exch 2010 server to the "first administrative group" via the security tab and give full permissions.  This solved that issue and
    I was able to proceed through the wizard to actually create the local move request.  However, after processing the request, I get the following error...
    Summary: 1 item(s). 0 succeeded, 1 failed.
    Elapsed time: 00:00:03
    <username>
    Failed
    Error:
    Mailbox database '0180b88c-0cb2-4b2f-981a-6bdaecc10fcb' is offline.
    MapiExceptionLogonFailed: Unable to make connection to the server. (hr=0x80040111, ec=1010)
    Diagnostic context:
        Lid: 13720   dwParam: 0x6D9      Msg: EEInfo: Flags: 0
        Lid: 11672   dwParam: 0x6D9      Msg: EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 4
        Lid: 8856    dwParam: 0x6D9      Msg: EEInfo: prm[0]: Unicode string: ncacn_ip_tcp
        Lid: 8856    dwParam: 0x6D9      Msg: EEInfo: prm[1]: Unicode string: <Exch03server>.<domainname>.local
        Lid: 12952   dwParam: 0x6D9      Msg: EEInfo: prm[2]: Long val: -545057711
        Lid: 12952   dwParam: 0x6D9      Msg: EEInfo: prm[3]: Long val: 382312662
        Lid: 45169   StoreEc: 0x824    
        Lid: 44273
        Lid: 59431   EMSMDB.EcDoConnectEx called [length=114]
        Lid: 34855   EMSMDB.EcDoConnectEx returned [ec=0x3F2][length=56][latency=4]
        Lid: 56945
        Lid: 59431   EMSMDB.EcDoConnectEx called [length=114]
        Lid: 34855   EMSMDB.EcDoConnectEx returned [ec=0x3F2][length=56][latency=4]
        Lid: 59505   StoreEc: 0x3F2    
        Lid: 52465   StoreEc: 0x3F2    
        Lid: 60065
        Lid: 33777   StoreEc: 0x3F2    
        Lid: 59805
        Lid: 52209   StoreEc: 0x3F2    
        Lid: 19778
        Lid: 27970   StoreEc: 0x3F2    
        Lid: 17730
        Lid: 25922   StoreEc: 0x3F2    
    Click here for help... http://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/ms.exch.err.default(EXCHG.141).aspx?v=14.1.218.11&t=exchgf1&e=ms.exch.err.ExC2B9A8
    Exchange Management Shell command attempted:
    '<domainname>.local/MyBusiness/Users/SBSUsers/<username>' | New-MoveRequest -TargetDatabase 'Mailbox Database 2011012823'
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:03
    I have tested running the command from the EMS and get the following...
    Mailbox database '0180b88c-0cb2-4b2f-981a-6bdaecc10fcb' is offline.
        + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (0:Int32) [New-MoveRequest], RemoteTransientException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : AC277C79,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.NewMoveRequest
    On the Exch03 Server I have verified/tested/done the following:
    --Verified the Information Store Service is running
    --Tested restarting the service
    --Verified the Mailbox store is mounted
    --Tested Dismounting and mounting
    --Tested the Exch2010 mailbox db store is functioning properly by creating a test account and verifying w/ OWA.
    --Verified routing group b/w servers
    --verified network connectivity b/w servers
    --Verified DNS is functioning properly on both servers
    --Installed Exchange Server MAPI Client and CDO 1.2.1 on Exch2010 server.
    --Tested rebooting both severs
    I am at a loss.  Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I am unable to continue w/ the migration until I get past this step.

    Hi,
    Thank you for sharing the resolution.
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. Thanks Gen Lin-MSFT

  • Local Change Request created in PRODUCTION needs to be moved to SANDBOX

    I need to transport a request from Production (BWP) to a sandbox system (BS1), but when I create the transport it is created as a Local Change Request. How can I change it to a transportable request? I've checked the development class and it is correct. The package is ZBW and the transport layer is ZBD1. Please help.

    Adding further to Santosh's suggestion....
    Creating the transport of copies is the easiest option..if this is a one time activity...
    Once the the objects are included from the Local change request to the transport of copies...release this...
    Then move the tranport files at the OS level to the import queue of the Sandbox system....then in STMS of the SANDBOX..attach these file to the queue and then import it....
    Thanks.

  • New Requests created are in 'Local Workbench Request' in R3 Development

    Hello ,
    I am going to transport data sources from R3 Dev to R3 Quality.
    I have successfully transported the package (which is created in SE80 ) and Application componenet hierarchy and all active version data source RSA6 to R3 Quality .
    I have also checked that the package , application transport hierarchy and data sources in R3 Quality.
    Now when I tried to create new requests for LBWE data sources ( maintain extract structure , generate data source) , I am getting a message Create Customizing Request , So I created Customizing Request and then I am getting message to create Local Workbench request. If I create local workbench request then it can not be imported to R3 Quality.
    Client R3 is open SCC4 settings are 'Automatic Recording of Changes ' and 'Changes to repository and cross client customizing are allowed'.
    I am not getting why the system is not asking me to created 'Workbench Request'.
    Thanks and Regards ,
    Amol Kulkarni

    Hello Viren ,
    Local Transport Request are not transportable even if we release them.
    I have resolved the issue in the below way ,
    I went to SE21 and entered the package name as 'YBW' and then clicked on change .
    Then Click on properties tab and then select Transport layer as SAP and save.
    Go to SE80 and select package and in dictonary Objects drill down view ...right click on any selected view name ...go to other function and click on Write Transport Entry...mention request from Own Request tab which was earlier as Local Workbench Request.
    Then go to SE10 and double click on request and go to properties tab ...there select Target Group as
    R3 Quality Server name and save it.
    Transport the package to R3 Quality.
    Henceforth whichever request u create will be of type 'Workbench Request'.
    go to SE10 and cross check that your request is now Workbench Request,
    Regards ,
    Amol K.

  • Exchange 2010 Local Move Request with Error (hr=0x80004005, ec=1292)

    Trying to migrate from exchange 2003 to 2010.
    Ran a Local move request and received the following error.
    What can I do?
    Summary: 1 item(s). 0 succeeded, 1 failed.
    Elapsed time: 00:00:01
    Aman Amiri
    Failed
    Error:
    MapiExceptionMailboxInTransit: Unable to open message store. (hr=0x80004005, ec=1292)
    Diagnostic context:
        Lid: 45095   EMSMDB.EcDoRpcExt2 called [length=121]
        Lid: 61479   EMSMDB.EcDoRpcExt2 returned [ec=0x0][length=48][latency=18]
        Lid: 23226   --- ROP Parse Start ---
        Lid: 27962   ROP: ropLogon [254]
        Lid: 17082   ROP Error: 0x50C     
        Lid: 26937  
        Lid: 21921   StoreEc: 0x50C     
        Lid: 31418   --- ROP Parse Done ---
        Lid: 22753  
        Lid: 21817   ROP Failure: 0x50C     
        Lid: 26297  
        Lid: 16585   StoreEc: 0x50C     
        Lid: 32441  
        Lid: 1706    StoreEc: 0x50C     
        Lid: 24761  
        Lid: 20665   StoreEc: 0x50C     
        Lid: 25785  
        Lid: 29881   StoreEc: 0x50C     
    Exchange Management Shell command attempted:
    'RWR.local/MyBusiness/Users/SBSUsers/Aman Amiri' | New-MoveRequest -TargetDatabase 'Mailbox Database 1110868248' -BadItemLimit '0'
    Elapsed Time: 00:00:01

    Hi
    Is the database on Exchange 2010/2003 mounted and all services started?
    Is your account part of Organization Management and able to perform the move requests?

  • Local change requests being created for changing package info

    Hi experts,
                     After a client copy of object into a new server whenever changes are being made to these objects local change requests are being created. i found that the above behaviour is because of the transport layer in the package, which was also copied during client copy, is of the old server. And when that was change to the one available in the new server the change to the package also got created as local change request. Now I wan this package to get transported to quality from development ( where the change was made). Please help.

    Hi,
         Thank you for your suggestion. I Created a Tp copy and included the local change requests in them and gave target system as quality system. There were 2 requests as local change requests, only one of them took the intended change in the quality but for the other the change made in the development system was not refelecting in the quality system.

  • New Local Move Request Script for Exchange 2010 mailboxes

    Hi I would like to have a script that can enable me automatically move mailboxes of certain domains to a new mailbox database. E.g.  new local move request to move only 20 mailboxes in mailboxdatabase01 with the domain name:  mymove.com, moving
    it to mailboxdatabase05. Also, I want to be able to adjust the number of mailboxes to move. Thanks in advance.

    Wrap this, or something similar, into a script that filters out the users with that domain in a particular DB.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd876878(v=exchg.141).aspx
    And some filtering examples are in here:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/rmilne/archive/2014/03/24/powershell-filtering-examples.aspx
    I doubt there is a sample script out there that does exactly what you want, so you'll have to do some coding.
    Cheers,
    Rhoderick
    Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
    Blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne 
    Twitter:   LinkedIn:
      Facebook:
      XING:
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Local move requests stuck with status "queued" at 0% completion

    Hello all,
    I'm running Exchange server 2010 SP3 with no aditonal RU.
    Suddenly we are unable to perform local move requests of mailboxes between databases.
    The requests will turn up in the list at Recipient "Configuration\Move Requests" but remain the with status Queued with 0% completion.
    It does not matter if the move request is initiated by EMC of the Shell.
    I cant find a solution so if someone has some advise that would be great,
    I tried the following:
    - Restarted the Mailbox Replication service on the CAS server
    - Rebooted the Mailbox, CAS and Edge server
    - Run a Test-MRSHealth check against the CAS
    - Checked all logs but there are no related entries
    - Checked my admin account permissions
    - Checked if it is related to certain mailboxes and source and destination databases which isn't the case
    What else can I do or check?
    Kind regards,
    Alex

    Hi,
    You mentioned you checked the event log, but there was no related events.
    Have you tried to use the get-moverequest | get-moverequeststatistics cmdlet to check result?
    If no, please run this command to see if there is any clues that can be used to narrow down this issue.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Question to local workbench request

    Hi,
    I have question to local workbench request. If this kind of request is released, is it stored also in the local transport folder (/usr/sap/trans...) in the file system? Or where I can find it?
    Thanks for your answers.

    Hello Andreas,
    A local workbench TR or for that matter any local Transport Request is one which has no target group/target system assigned to it and hence even after releasing it the changes stored in it don't get moved to other systems.
    A local TR when released does not get stored in /usr/sap/trans folder as data and co-files for local TRs don't get created.
    A released local TR can be viewed in SE01 transaction in SAP.
    Please let us know what is your exact requirement with local workbench TR? May be we will be able to help you out with that.
    PS award points if you found this answer useful.
    Regards.
    Ruchit.

  • How to transfer local workbench request to production server

    Hi,
    All my workbench requests are saved under local change request node instead of being in the production system node. How to release and transport these requests to the production server.
    Kindly help.
    Regards,
    Sriram

    Hi Sriram,
    In SE01 check whether u have given value for target system or not.
    Target system is ur production system  .Check whether u have specified it in SE01 for ur transport request.
    If u have not specified target system for ur Transport request it will be shown in Local Workbench request
    Regards,
    lakshman.
    Edited by: Lakshman N on Aug 4, 2009 9:31 AM

  • Local change requests

    Dear All,
    One of transport request has ersides at
    302-> Workbench -> Local change requests . --> When I release the Transport
    request its didnot create a data and cofiles under /usr/sap/tans folder. 
    At the same time  Transport request is resides at
    302-> Workbench ->  DMY Dummy->Released the request -> created the  data and cofiles.
    1. What is the Difference between Local change requests and DMY transport requests.  ?
    2. How to get the data and cofiles of transport request resides under Local change requests. is their any way to copy and create a new transport. If yes. How to copy and create a new transport request in sap R3 4.6C.?
    Thanks
    Malai

    Dear Sharath,
    Thank you for the detaild information.
    I have mistakenly already released local transport request,  Now status shows that released. And screen is not editable.
    Hence I tried  your second options.
    Created the copy of "Local Change request" which I already released,
    XXXK900206       XXXPADM       For Pmg Modification 20100531 Modification
         XXXPK900207   XXXPADM       Repair (Changed from Unclassified)
             Object list of request
             Comment: Object list included
             Report source
    First I released the reference  Transport Request. Its released fine, then  When I release the transport request it prompt a small window
    Object Checks
    Not all objects in the request could be locked
    Do you want to release them anyway?
    Yes or Error or Cancel  is available.
    I clicked the error button.  found that below message on the screen.
    Object LIMU REPS ZFFF0020:
    Only edit objects from development class ZPF001 in local requests
    Object LIMU REPS ZFFF0320:
    nly edit objects from development class ZPF001 in local requests
    Object LIMU REPS ZFFF0380:
    _When I click Icon which resides above error , it prompt me the below window_
    Only edit objects from development class ZPN001 in local requests
    Message no. TK 332
    Diagnosis
    Objects in development class ZPN001 cannot be edited in transportable Workbench requests in the current system FNP. The transport routes are configured such that objects from development class ZPN001 can only be edited in local Workbench requests.
    System Response
    The function terminates.
    Procedure
    You have the following options:
    If you want to transport objects in development class ZPN001 into the target TS1 once only, without changing the configuration of the transport routes, then create a transport of copies in the extended view of the Transport Organizer (Transaction SE01). Go to the request overview and choose Request/task -> Object list -> Include objects to include your objects in this transport of copies.
    If you would like objects in development class ZPN001 to be transported generally into the target system TS1, contact your transport administrator. In this case, the configuration of the transport routes must be corrected in the Transport Management System (TMS). For details, see the documentation on the Transport Management System.
    PLease let me know how to procedd?.
    Thanks
    Malai

  • Tansportable request change to local change request by mistake

    Hi,
    I have a  standard 3 system TMS, DEV,QAS, PRD
    I delete the virtual QAS and active the transport route by mistake, and all the transport able request changed to local change request...
    and now I have configured the TMS in the right way.
    and can create the transportable request.
    How can I move the old requests back?
    From local chang request to transportable request?
    Many thanks.
    BR,
    Randy

    Hi ,
    I remeber doing something like this.
    SE01--> Create a transport of copies request --->create new request ---> then to the new requset ---> go to the Request/task (menu item) -
    > other request (here we can choose which transport we want to include in this new TR) .
    I am not really sure why we choosed like Transport of copies and why not others.etc.
    Even I need to read more about this.I remembered that this worked for us.
    Hope this helps you too .
    Thanks.

  • Need to change the local change request to development class for Process Ch

    Hello ,
    I have created a Tranport request for Process chain but its saved as local change request .
    Please suggest how to change that .
    Thanks ,
    Rahul

    Hi
    1.First delete the request which you collected the process chain as local object becuase you will not able to collect the process chian again.
    2. Goto Tranport connector to collect the process chain again.
    3. Select grouping option as necessary objects.
    4. Drag and drop the process chain to the right hand side
    5. After collecting the process chain, click on the package icon and give the package created for development class.
    6. The system will ask for Transport request and save the PC in the Transport Request.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards
    Sadeesh

  • Default transport under Local change request

    Dear Friends,
    I am trying to transport objects from dev to QAS. i catch hold of the object, create transport request. By Default they are getting assigned to Local Change Requests instead of being assigned to Modifiable requests under target system. (in SE09)
    how can i change the default from local change request to Quality.
    Regards
    Paddy

    Thanks Edwin,
    this is what i am doing now. But, by default i want it to be set in Quality--> Modifiable.
    Everytime going to settings and changing it does not seem to be a permanent solution.
    Request your earliest response.
    Rgds.

Maybe you are looking for