Maintenance Order is not settling

Hi Seniors - While settling the maintenance order, error is coming "Settlement rule is not distributed". Its working for some order types and for some its not working.
Kindly assist me in finding the right node where these settings are maintained. I am unable to figure out...
Thanks & Regards
Manmohan K Bajaj

Hi
Are there more than 2 settlement receivers in the settlement rule?
if yes, you need to maintain a % allocation between the two
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Services for Object in Maintenance order can not link

Hello,
"Services for object" in Maintenance Order can not link to share point.
Linking documents from the C drive or Global drive is successful but if SHAREPOINT is used, it fails
When trying to link to a Word document on our Sharepoint... It fails... when I'm in an order... it gives me an error... (displayed on the attached Word file...) and when I'm working within a document... (CVN02) it merely links to my C:\ drive which won't work...
We need to link to our "master" Sharepoint (web based) documents.
Please suggest the solution.
Thanks
Regards
Anil

Anil,
Couldn't you add the web address as the attachment?
Regards
Narasimhan

Purchase Requisition created from Maintenance Order can not deleted

Hi Gurus,
I've create a Maintenance Order for External Service (Control Key: PM02) and Purchase Requisition already created related to this Maintenance Order.
But when I want to cancel/delete the Purchase Requisition, there is error message "This item is only deletable via the associated production order". So II can not delete the PR.
Any solution for this problem ?
Regards,
Tri W

Hi,
If the PR has not been approved and no PO has been created yet, you have to delete the external service operation (PM02) in the work order. This should delete the Pruchase Requisitions.
Regards,
Joey

KO8G - Internal Order will not settle

While trying to settle out internal orders in KO8G for closing, this Error appeared:
NA FF716
Error in assigning the tax group
I searched that error message and found:
"The symptom occurs if in the Customizing for Tax Jurisdiction, the country is not maintained for the determination of the FI tax procedure and if the payer has a Tax Jurisdiction Number."
It is regarding the 1st internal order - it is set up correctly on books but will not settle out. Needs to be fixed before October closing.
What should be done? Any ideas?

This is the entire message I received from the end user:
(I am not a finance person, so much of this is un familiar to me)
Today when I went to settle out internal orders in KO8G for closing, I got hit with this error message. It is related to the very first internal order set up in SAP for a DK capital purchase. It was all set up correctly on DK's books, but it would not settle out.
What I did to allow the KO8G transaction to work for closing was to do an accrual entry on DK's books pulling the figure out of 510095-204062 and booking to an open CIP account 160170. This will reverse itself back in October so hopefully you can provide us with what is needing to be done so we can settle it come time for October closing.

Preventive Maintenance Order is not releasing as per scheduled Planning in Counter Based Plan

Hi Experts
In The below schenario
There is a counter based maintenance plan. of strategy 100 km,200 km,...1800 km..
Operaton1, Operation2,... Operation3... defined in maintenance package for 100 km, 200 km,.... respectively.
Now issue is that system is releasing order as per sequence of scheduled planing & not according to schedule of current counter reading of counter.
case: At 200km order 1 is released with operation1 only, logicaly system should release order with operation1, & operation2
same like that at 300 km, system has released order with op1 & op2, logicaly system should release order with operation1, & operation3 as per strategy defined in maintenance plan.
In the present condition, what we have to do to get the desired result like for next counter reading of 400 KM system should release order with op1, & op4.
Best Regards
Pravin Gautam

1st order is getting generated by 100 KM. While doing Preventive Maintenance, vehicle will not have any movements so that counter reading at the completion should as same as 100 KM.
I am not clear how & why you entered 200 KM for completion of PM order.
Also, if you complete the 1st Preventive Maintenance at 200 KM, from there only system should calculate the next order. Its not Time based as this will come automatically with predefined frequency. Your plan is Performance based & system will act according to the completion of previous Preventive Maintenance.
I don't find any reason to change behavior which is correct. I am not convinced with the development which is giving wrong details to the business.

Maintenance order system status

Hi Guys,
Currently system status in maintenance order is not in sequence, so user is getting confused about the status. I have suggested for user status which is more precise to get to knwo the status, but they want the system status also updated to be in sequence so that they can look at the last status and update to whomever enquiring abt that, also they asked me to change the descriptiion of the order status. I think we can do that update in table "TJ02T" with the ABAP'ers help as I dont have acces to update the table, but tell me how I can make the system status to display it in sequence in maintenance order, anything we can control over configuration or we need developers help to update the functional module "STATUS_TEXT_EDIT".
All your help are really appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Thanks for your advise. I have already talked ot them to use the user status in case of better understanding the status.The users are specific about the active status which means in each update of teh order they want the latest status to be listed in the top, but in maint. order after release once the goods movement is posted the release status is still listed top and then followed by goods posted status, also when you do time confirmation the confirmation status listed below release status and above goods posted status. Finally when you TECO the order the released staus is gone and TECO listed top which is fine but settlement rule created status listed at the bottom of the statuses which they dont want, they want teh active status should be listed in sequence every time order is get updated and they want to see what are steps order gone thru.
If I define the user status profile and want to update automatically the user statuses when the updates are done, for example I have define the initial step as created and want to updated automatically to release status when order is released, same way for each updates, How we can do this is there anyway we can control thru config or we have go for development???? pls let me know the procedure. I have already created the user statuses with priority and assigned to order types.

G/L accounts or cost elements for maintenance order

Hi,
Can anybody explain the following.
1- What are the applications of inventory and consumption cost element / GL accounts, while posting goods issuance, good receipt and maintain service entry sheet with reference of maintenance orders' reservations and purchase requisitions? I want to know which cost element or GL account is debit and credit during every posting. And What are their impacts on maintenance order?
2- What is the purpose of "source" (cost element group) and "settlement cost element assignment" in allocation structure when we want settle maintenance order on cost center?
3- On which accounting term, the maintenance order should be settled, cost center or GL account? what is the best practices?
Regards,

Goods Issue & Goods Receipt:
In OBYC, G/L account for Inventory posting & Offset account for that Inventory posting will be maintained. Inventory posting will be BSX & Offset will be GBB.
In Material Master, valuation class will be assigned. Based on this valuation class, this entry will be taken.
Service Entry Sheet:
Problem with Service Entry Sheet creation through ML81N
service entry sheet

While settlment of internal order down payment settled

Dear All,
We have made a down payment to vendor by using f-48 given reference of Internal Order & P.O Number, but while settlement of internal order to AUC Down payment also settled.
How to exclude Down Payment?
Regards
Vishvas B

Hi Jigar
I will brief You the background
Scenerio 1
When we ar Trying to Book Advcance for Captial (Sp GL type "M")
We need to to book against PO no But it is not coming in "M scenario
PLs configure it as reqd.
Solution
so I changed the field status, PO order Optional entry
Now client put P.O No & Internal Order No. in down payment made
Point 2
Internal Order can not settled
error was Transaction type entered belongs to transaction type group 15 the asset you are posting belogs to asset class AUC
solution
Solution
OAYB
Transaction type group selet 15 down payment allowed all AUC
OKEP
Down payment Default cost element
Now I reversed the above setting,
what is the alternate for excluding down payment while settlement of Internal Order
Thanks
Regards
Vishvas
Vishvas

PR from Maintenance Order - Material Purchase

Dear Experts,
Likewise we can generate Servide PR against Maintenance Order, also it picks service data frrom Maintenance Order....Similarly can we generate PR for Material Purchase against Order also it should pick Material from component that we have enetered in Maintenance Order ..is it possible??
Thanks
DM

Hi
Deletion of PR from Maintenance Order is not possible because the PR is created automatically
This PR will get deleted automatically when you cancel//teco/complete the order
Otherway around is you can always block the PRs
Regards
Kartik

Deletetion of service PR from maintenance order

Hi Experts ,
Is it possible to delete service PR from maintenance order. If it is created from order due to some problem I want to delete it ,so is it possible ?
With best regards,
AVI DDS.

Hi
Deletion of PR from Maintenance Order is not possible because the PR is created automatically
This PR will get deleted automatically when you cancel//teco/complete the order
Otherway around is you can always block the PRs
Regards
Kartik

Multiple doc type setting for service PR generated from Maintenance order

Hi Gurus,
My client has multiple company code and has different document type for PR and PO as per the company code. For generating the service PR from maintenance order system take the document type of PR defined in the config.
Is it possible to define multiple document type for service PR depend on the company code/ Plant level?
Kindly help.
Regards
DP

Hi Ravi,
I used the User Exit COZF0001 . Since we can assign only one PR doc type in the config .
I have assigned one PR doc type in configuration which will work for a company code and all their respective plant. So in this case user exit wont do any job for changing the doc type.
You will defined a condition in the User exit saying that if company code /plant which you get it from maintenance order is not same (Config ) then provide the PR doc type which you want to create for respect plant or company code.
I dont have coding right now with me. You need a small coding to be done to create the separate PR doc type in EBAN-BSART
with respect to plant . Check in your configuration at what point of time you are creating the PR either in saving or release of MO. You can take the even to activate the User exit.
Consult your ABAPer they can do in 10 min.
DP

Classifikation for plant maintenance orders

Hello Experts,
we want to use classification for maintenance orders but we are struggling with the set up of the order types. It seems that order type 30 - maintenance orders - is not set up for classification (differently to order type 10 for example).
Does anybody know if there is any chance to create an order type used for PM which enables the usage of classification?
If it is possible, all details for the set up are highly appreciated.
Thanks
Kurt

Hello,
Pushpa - sorry, I don't understand what you are talking about, please explain a little more in detail, it is also the opposite statement of what Paul has replied.
How can I classify PM orders which belong to order category 30? How to classify objects used in the orders I know, but how to classify the orders itselves - like you can do for example with orders of order category 10 - the normal production orders.
My first idea was to change settings for order category 30 or to copy this category and assign the new category to PM - how to do this, is it possible, this was the question since I did not find any possibility.
Paul confirmed that there is no way to do so.
You said that you even classify orders of the Ides standard type PM01 - how do you do that? Sorry, I did not uderstand your explaination how to do - use an activity type? Could you please tell me what and how and where to do in detail?
thanks a lot
Kurt

Reg - Subcontracting through Maintenance Order

Scenario :Sending a Equipment through Maintenance Order outside for repair, whotrat are the steps need to follow
I have the following doubts
1. For Example, Motor for Service
Motor is the returnable component and Bearing Is a spare parts needed to repair the motor, I have to send both motor & bearing to vendor. I will only get motor back from service, bearing is consumed during repair.
1.How to send Motor & Bearing......whats the mov type ?
2. what are the key fileds i need to set in the Material master for both the material
3. Howthe cost is taken care for the consumed spare (Bearing)
4. How to track the stock at vendor stock
Regards
Prakash.B

It is suggestable to use refurbishment process.
You may check with the movement type 541 for GI of the material (equipment), you can mention the bearing in the components tab and consume it against the order. You have to create an external service requirement through the order using PM03 control key in the Operation Tab.
The cost is captured as below:
1. Material Consumption - w.r.t GI - to the order
2. Vendor payment - w.r.t Service entry sheet - to the order.
Hence the total amount is captured against the maintenance order.
Then settle the order as required.
Praveen

IW38 / IW39 list of Maintenance Orders

Hi friends,
In IW38 and IW39 list of Maintenance Orders are not appearing in Production Client. The same transaction is working in Quality Client. Please help me.
Thanks in Advance.
With Best Regards,
Dev

hi
check the selection parameter you have specified in the IW38/IW39 .
also check in table AUFK whether the order is populated in the database table
regards
thyagarajan

Automatic Creation of Settlement Rule for Maintenance Order

Hi,
While doing TECO for Maintenance Order, its asking for Settlement Rule. IF I click settlement rule, message is coming as Maintain Settlement Profile with options like With Default, Without Default & Cancel.
I have maintained the Cost center in Equipment Master. Also I maintained Cost Center as Default Settlement receiver.
Also I have gone through setting in Automatic Creation of Settlement Rule under Controlling Category.
But I couldnt understand that. Can you please tell what are the steps to be done?
Regards,
Maheswaran.

Hi,
Please check the indicatorsin Actual cost/cost sales and Valid recevivers in settlement profile.
If for cost center : 1 settlement optional is maintained in valid recevivers and also for order
and in actual cost/ cost sales: indicator to be settled in full is selected.
Also check Allocation structure too if you have assigned the valid allocation structure.
**check if you have assigned the valid settlement profile to order types.
*****Most important after doing all these settings you need to create new order. for same order you will not get the automatic settlement rule
Hope this helps.
Regards,
PMAddi

Maintenance Order is not settling

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for