MGRE in VRF and Source Interface Issue

friends,
I have a scenario where i need to use multiple multi-point GRE tunnels and put them in VRF for each customer. The problem i am facing is that for each Tunnel i use Routers loopback in global table as source address. It works fine for one Tunnel. But as soon as i create another tunnel using the same loopback as source. Both tunnels go down. If i use different loopback addresses for each tunnel, all tunnels stays up. Can anyone tell me why i cannot use one loopback as source-address for all tunnels?? creating indiviual loopback for each tunnel doesn't seem scalable.
interface Tunnel0
ip vrf forwarding RED
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
ip nhrp map 10.0.0.4 172.16.1.4
ip nhrp map 10.0.0.5 172.16.1.5
ip nhrp network-id 1
tunnel source Loopback0
tunnel mode gre multipoint
end
interface Tunnel1
ip vrf forwarding BLUE
ip address 11.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
no ip redirects
ip nhrp map 11.0.0.6 172.16.1.6
ip nhrp network-id 2
tunnel source Loopback1
tunnel mode gre multipoint
end
interface FastEthernet0/0
description *** Connected to Customers for mGRE ***
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.0
end
interface Loopback0
ip address 1.1.1.254 255.255.255.255
end

Hello
Can you provide show interface tunnel
Harish

Similar Messages

SNMP Source interface issue

Hi All,
Is it necessary to mention snmp-server trap-source <interface name> while configuring SNMP in a router/switch?. what if we do not configure this command on a device having multiple interfaces?
Regards,
VB

The original post had a two part question, so I will provide a two part answer.
1) Is it necessary to specify the trap source interface? No it is not necessary to specify the trap source interface. Traps will be sent anyway but it becomes more difficult to predict what source address will be used.
2) What happens if we do not configure it. As Afroz explains the device will use what it considers to be the closest interface at that particular time to send the trap. The result is that as interface status may change or as routing table information changes some traps may be sent with Gig0/1 as the source while other traps are sent with Gig0/2 as the source. The reality is that all these traps are from the same device but it will be difficult to see that as you look at the received traps and see different sources.
So I would say that while it is not necessary it is certainly recommended, especially when the device has more than one interface that could potentially serve as the source.
HTH
Rick

Two storage box (3510 and 6140) interface issue...

Hi All,
In my setup we were previously used storage box 3510 but having space issues we are purchasing new storage box of six series 6140. Now, I don't have any clear idea that both the storage can easily mounted on the servers? or there are some interface issues might be?
Can anyone suggest me what are the points(like network, HD and etc.) I have to consider for the compatibility of these storage box?
Thanks...

Hi user505
Now, I don't have any clear idea that both the storage can easily mounted on the servers? or there are some interface issues might be?How many HBA's do your current hosts that are connected to the 3510 have ? are they are single port single card or dual ported card ?.
Depending on how many HBA's you have in your server I would configure up the 6140 with the initiators , map the new volumes straight to the server and then do your copying of data.
In regards to network config etc you'd need to setup the 6140 as per the normal configuration for out of band access , so you can get it via CAM.
Hope that helps
David

Logic and audio interface issues. help!

Hey guys
I recently bought a small budget recording studio, My first one so bare with the newbie questions and I'm having diffucties with the setup I believe.
I connected my midi keyboard to my computer that had Midi in/out from the keyboard via USB Midi interface to the computer. That was all cool. The computer was seeing it and in Logic was telling me signals were coming into logic.
I then connected my Edirol audio interface ( FA-66 ) 6in/6out. to the computer via Firewire. Midi setup in utlilities sees the device. And that's good right?
I then used stereo jacks to connect the audio interface to my studio monitors. I played a song in itunes music is coming through the speakers, great!
Now off to the problem, finally. The reason I got the audio capture device is so that I can record Vocals and guitars, but the thing is when I connect my Mic and guitar to the device no sound in coming into logic, eventhough I can play the guitar clean through my monitor speakers. Very strange. I see 6 input/output channels in logic so it sees the edirol. So if i set Input 2 in logic and put the guitar in inputjack 2 the signal doesn't get through.
Am I supposed to intertwine the Midi keyboard and audio interface together? If so how is that done? Can anybody help?
Thanks for baring with the newbie!

Don't go beating yourself up... you'll rob the trolls of their only pleasure.
It's like you said: you're new. We were all new once.
Glad you're up and running... let's hear some music.
jord

SNMP inform request source-interface

Instead of using SNMP TRAPS I would like to use INFORM requests. When I receive TRAPS everything is working correcty. When I receive INFORM requests, the source interface is reported wrong.
My config:
snmp-server trap-source Loopback0
snmp-server source-interface informs Loopback0
snmp-server enable traps snmp linkup
snmp-server enable traps config
snmp-server host 10.101.1.15 inform version 2c public
snmp-server host 10.101.1.15 version 2c public
The TRAPS report their source address as Loopback0 but the INFORMS report their source address as FastEthernet0.

Hello,
we are also migrating from traps to informs and I can see that this source-interface issue is still open. I can confirm it is happening on Cisco 7609-S with IOS: 12.2.(33)SRD5, SRD6 and SRE2.
In bug toolkit I can see it opened for 6500 under CSCtc43231 (http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtc43231) but there is no any SR release under affected versions.
If anyone knows any workaround, I would appreciate it a lot.
Thanks in advance!

Sourced Based VRFs and IPSEC

Hi All,
I have 2 questions.
1) Does Cisco Router 7600 with SUP720 3BXL supports VRF Selection based on Source IP Address [Layer 3 VPNs]?
2) We have various clients reaching a Router and we want to forward them to a their company's VRFs, based on their source address (Given by Radius or Statically). Now, Ideally, we want to give to the customer's H.Q. the option to connect to this router using Leased Lines (or Frame Relays) or by using IPSEC (over the internet). Is this possible? Can traffic from an access server arrive to an interface and based on the source, the user will be either forwarded to a VRF or an IPSEC?
Regards.
Regards.

Hello,
a solution to xour problem could be to have a VRF aware access server and place the customers into their respective VRF right away (the feature is called Multi-VRF aka VRF-lite). IPSec and Dialer interfaces are possible. Based on authentication you could define the VRF and by having a dot1Q trunk to the 7600 which operates as the MPLS PE.
A second option is to have the trunk to the 7600, VLANs in different VRFs and to do PBR into different VLANs on the CE router/access server.
Hope this helps! please rate all posts.
Regards, Martin

Get the source coding and the interface of a from routine (4.6C)

Hello,
I am looking for a way to get the source coding and the interface of a Form routine. Having a look at the functionality used in SE80, I found the function module RS_SEARCH_FORM.
By specifying the following parameters:
Include Name:                      i_incl
Main program:                      i_mainprogram
Form routine name                i_objectname
Object Type for Form routine: i_objecttype
you receive the "pattern", which is being generated by using the drag and drop
functionality for Form routines in SE80. For example:
PERFORM test
            USING
               a.
In addition to this, I am looking for a way to get the source coding and the interface for a form routine in a 4.6C system.
The mentioned function module has a tables parameter called i_source but I didn't find out how to execute it in order receive the source code.
It would be great if you could help me to solve this issue.
Best regards,
Fabian

Hi,
the only idea I have is to scan the source code for the form routine in order to retrieve the needed information. It would be great to have a standardized function module, which provides this functionality.
Regards,
Fabian

VRF and DHCP issue

VRF and DHCP issue
We have a 6500 ( 12.2 (33) SXH5 ) that has a VRF running for our guest network. On this 6500 resides the DHCP pool with a range defined for our guest network. We have a stack of 3750's (12.2 (46) SE) connected to the 6500 with a L3 connection. The 3750's have a local guest VLAN with its gateway defined in a VLAN interface. This VLAN on the 3750 has an IP helper address pointing to an IP within the VRF on the 6500. When debugging DHCP on the 6500, a request is received and sent back out. The client never receives this request.
If a static IP is applied, the client is able to communicate anywhere within the VRF successfully (including pinging the IP within the helper-address. As many posts have pointed out - there is no VRF <name> under the ip dhcp pool <name> within the 6500. I am just wondering if anyone else has run into this and what their solution was.
Thanks.

Hi,
I have tested the dhcp server and vrf on Cisco 3640 and it is working without VRF under the ip dhcp pool. Please ensure that you have configured routing for the dhcp-relay agent(VLAN facing dhcp client on 3750 in your case).

Open Interface for Approved Supplier Lists and Sourcing Rules

Hi All,
Is there an open interface or an API available for Appeoved Supplier Lists and Sourcing Rules.
Thanks and Regards,
MPH

Hi sandeep,
I prefer to use the API mentioned.
However this is in Oracle Manufactirung and we dont use that module instead I want to define them in Oracle Purchasing.
can I still do it in Purchasing using the same API.
Further as per the document there are 3 entities
01) Sourcing Rule/Bill of Distribution
02) Receiving Organization
03) Shipping Organization
Do I need to define all 3 in order to make it work?
Thanks and Regards,
MPH

Is it possible for Nexus7000 flexible netflow monitor for interfaces with different vrf and export to one netflow analyzer?

I have a Nexus 7000 with many vlan interfaces with multiple vrf, I would like to know if my netflow analyzer only connected to one vrf, can I use flexible netflow on the Nexus 7000 to monitor those vlan interfaces with multiple vrf and export them to my netflow analyzer, so that I can see all flow from different vrfs on my netflow analyzer?
Thank you!

Adriano, there is a RV042G, which supports the gig ports and a 800 mbps nat throughput. Here is the datasheet
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps10907/ps9923/ps12262/data_sheet_c78-706724.html
If you are using a DSL connection, the SRP527/547 models may be an alternative. These models support the RFC 1483 Bridges EOA Please note the SRP547 should be 10/100/1000. Also note the SRP521/541 are Fast Ethernet units and they do differ from the SRP527/547. The main selling point of these devices are the FXS/FXO ports. So this may also be a bit of an "unfocused" solution. But it's worth throwing the idea out there!
Here is the admin guide;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/unified_communications/srp540_series/administration/srp500_AG_2567701.pdf
Here is the datasheet;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6790/gatecont/ps10500/data_sheet_c78-550705.pdf

FlexVPN with F-VRF and multiple tunnels

Hi There,
I have a burning question and initially need to understand the possibility of the following scenario, below is a diagram of a single point-to-point connection used for proof of concept. The Hub router acts as a local RADIUS and is to issue IP addresses for both the client tunnel interfaces.
Two separate tunnels are required, one between Virtual-template 1 and tunnel 1 and one between Virtual-template 2 and tunnel 2, hence they are within a separate VRF on both routers.
Basically I am wondering if this is possible as getting this to work is a struggle.. I am currently using PSK authentication, though also wondering if there would be issues using certificates, i.e. the hub would effectively receive two separate SAs with the same certificate.
The flex client and hub have separate profiles keyrings etc for each connection...
Has anyone got this working before??
Any help or suggestions/pitfalls would be appreciated.

Hi Olpeleri,
Many thx for the reply,
I have tried using two interfaces on the Hub, though no joy so far..... I want to have the hub tunnel end points in different VRFs, hence I have tried with two virtual templates A and B and interfaces A and B in different VRFs to each other.
i.e, looking at just one tunnel to start with,
HUB
interface Virtual-Template1 type tunnel
ip vrf forwarding VRF_A
ip unnumbered Loopback20
tunnel source Ethernet0/0
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel protection ipsec profile IPSEC-PROFILE
end
interface e0/0
ip vrf forwarding VRF_A
ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.255.0
Is this config correct, I have tried using a front door VRF for each interface also, though the tunnel fails to build when both interfaces are there
The profile looks like this repeated for each interface with different names and virtual template etc..
crypto ikev2 profile default
match fvrf any
match identity remote fqdn domain cisco.com
identity local fqdn Hub1.cisco.com
authentication remote pre-share
authentication local pre-share
keyring ALL
pki trustpoint cisco
dpd 10 2 periodic
aaa authorization group psk AUTHOR_LIST AUTHOR_POL
virtual-template 1
Thanks,

VRF & OSPF passive interfaces

Hello,
if configuring OSPF for a VRF you cannot configure passive interfaces! The command does not even exist!
This seems to be related to CSCeb86068.
Does anyone have experiences with that issue??
Any intelligent solution??
Thanks
Juerg

1.For no neighbor in your VPN, you can try BGP as PE-CE routing protocol.
router bgp 65000
address-family ipv4 vrf school
network x.x.x.x mask x.x.x.x
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
R1#v all 172.16.1.0
BGP routing table entry for 172:16:172.16.1.0/24, version 373
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table school)
Flag: 0x820
Advertised to update-groups:
1 2
Local
0.0.0.0 from 0.0.0.0 (172.16.0.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, sourced, local, best
Extended Community: RT:172:16
2.If you still need use ospf and passive interface in your ospf vrf, upgrade to 12.4.2 or above. :)

Setting the source-interface in a tcl script for email.

So once again I am trying to figure this out and failing miserably. The only thin I can think of at the moment is that I need to tell it to source from a specific vrf interface. I've tried looking through possible enviornment variables. Hoping I could set it that way but have yet to find one. I have read varios settings for source-interface and attempted them. But fail every time with:
vpn_failure.tcl: smtp_send_email: error connecting to mail server:
EEM Version:
sho event manager version
Embedded Event Manager Version 4.00
Component Versions:
eem: (rel4)1.0.4
eem-gold: (rel1)1.0.2
eem-call-home: (rel2)1.0.0
Below is the stock format for sending the email from the script. If someone could guide me in the correct way to set this up to source the interface that would be awesome.
# create mail form
action_syslog msg "Creating mail header for vpn_failure.tcl script..."
set body [format "Mailservername: %s" "$_email_server"]
set body [format "%s\nFrom: %s" "$body" "$_email_from"]
set body [format "%s\nTo: %s" "$body" "$_email_to"]
set _email_cc ""
set body [format "%s\nCc: %s" "$body" ""]
set body [format "%s\nSubject: %s\n" "$body" "VPN Failure Detected: Router $routername Crypto tunnel is DOWN. Peer $remote_peer"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "Report Summary:"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - syslog message"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - summary of interface(s) in an up/down state"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show ip route $remote_peer"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show crypto isakmp sa"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show crypto session detail"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show crypto engine connection active"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show ip nhrp detail (DMVPN only)"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show log"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- syslog message ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "$syslog_msg"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- summary of interface(s) in an up/down state ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_ip_interface_brief_up_down"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show ip route $remote_peer ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_ip_route"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show crypto isakmp sa ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_crypto_isakmp_sa"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show crypto session detail ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_crypto_session_detail"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show crypto engine connection active ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_crypto_engine_connection_active"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show ip nhrp detail (DMVPN only) ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_ip_nhrp_detail"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show log ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_log"]
if [catch {smtp_send_email $body} result] {
    action_syslog msg "smtp_send_email: $result"

I got this far, saw the MAXRUN error, bumped that out and then turned on debugging. I am still not connecting to the mail server. So I don't think I am reaching the mail server yet. I don't think it is using the sourceinterface. In debugging everyting in the script works except for the mail portion.
Jul 29 16:01:00.334: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: Creating mail header for vpn_failure.tcl script...
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: Process Forced Exit- MAXRUN timer expired.
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:     while executing
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: "action_syslog msg "smtp_send_email: $result""
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:     invoked from within
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: "$slave eval $Contents"
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:     (procedure "eval_script" line 7)
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:     invoked from within
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: "eval_script slave $scriptname"
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:     invoked from within
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: "if {$security_level == 1} {       #untrusted script
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:      interp create -safe slave
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:      interp share {} stdin slave
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:      interp share {} stdout slave
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: ..."
Jul 29 16:02:36.464: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl:     (file "tmpsys:/lib/tcl/base.tcl" line 50)
Jul 29 16:02:36.465: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: Tcl policy execute failed:
Jul 29 16:02:36.465: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: Process Forced Exit- MAXRUN timer expired.
Debugging On:
Jul 29 16:28:51.471: [fh_smtp_debug_cmd]
Jul 29 16:28:51.472: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl : DEBUG(smtp_lib) : smtp_connect : attempt 2
Jul 29 16:29:24.473: [fh_smtp_debug_cmd]
Jul 29 16:29:24.473: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl : DEBUG(smtp_lib) : smtp_connect : attempt 3
Jul 29 16:29:57.475: [fh_smtp_debug_cmd]
Jul 29 16:29:57.475: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl : DEBUG(smtp_lib) : smtp_connect : attempt 4
Jul 29 16:30:30.478: [fh_smtp_debug_cmd]
Jul 29 16:30:30.479: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl : DEBUG(smtp_lib) : smtp_connect : attempt 5
Jul 29 16:31:00.482: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: smtp_send_email: error connecting to mail server:
cannot connect to all the candidate mail servers
Jul 29 16:31:00.483: %HA_EM-6-LOG: vpn_failure.tcl: vpn_failure.tcl script completed
event manager environment _email_server 10.79.1.126
event manager environment _email_from [email protected]
event manager environment _email_to [email protected]
interface Port-channel1.101
description MGMT-1
encapsulation dot1Q 101
vrf forwarding MGMT-1
ip address 10.79.1.252 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
redundancy rii 101
redundancy group 2 ip 10.79.1.254 exclusive decrement 10
end
#----------------------- send mail ----------------------
# create mail form
action_syslog msg "Creating mail header for vpn_failure.tcl script..."
set body [format "Mailservername: %s" "$_email_server"]
set body [format "%s\nFrom: %s" "$body" "$_email_from"]
set body [format "%s\nTo: %s" "$body" "$_email_to"]
set _email_cc ""
set body [format "%s\nCc: %s" "$body" "[email protected]"]
set body [format "%s\nSourceintf: %s" "$body" "port-channel1.101"]
set body [format "%s\nSubject: %s\n" "$body" "VPN Failure Detected: Router $routername Crypto tunnel is DOWN. Peer $remote_peer"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "Report Summary:"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - syslog message"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - summary of interface(s) in an up/down state"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show ip route $remote_peer"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show crypto isakmp sa"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show crypto session detail"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show crypto engine connection active"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show ip nhrp detail (DMVPN only)"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "   - show log"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- syslog message ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n%s" "$body" "$syslog_msg"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- summary of interface(s) in an up/down state ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_ip_interface_brief_up_down"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show ip route $remote_peer ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_ip_route"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show crypto isakmp sa ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_crypto_isakmp_sa"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show crypto session detail ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_crypto_session_detail"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show crypto engine connection active ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_crypto_engine_connection_active"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show ip nhrp detail (DMVPN only) ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_ip_nhrp_detail"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "---------- show log ----------"]
set body [format "%s\n\n%s" "$body" "$show_log"]
if [catch {smtp_send_email $body} result] {
    action_syslog msg "smtp_send_email: $result"
action_syslog msg "vpn_failure.tcl script completed"
#------------------ end of send mail --------------------

Dynamic PAT and Static NAT issue ASA 5515

Hi All,
Recently we migrated our network to ASA 5515, since we had configured nat pool overload on our existing router the users are able to translated their ip's outside. Right now my issue was when I use the existing NAT configured to our router into firewall, it seems that the translation was not successful actually I used Dynamic NAT. When I use the Dynamic PAT(Hide) all users are able to translated to the said public IP's. I know that PAT is Port address translation but when I use static nat for specific server. The Static NAT was not able to translated. Can anyone explain if there's any conflict whit PAT to Static NAT? I appriciate their response. Thanks!
- Bhal

Hi,
I would have to guess that you Dynamic PAT was perhaps configured as a Section 1 rule and Static NAT configured as Section 2 rule which would mean that the Dynamic PAT rule would always override the Static NAT for the said host.
The very basic configured for Static NAT and Default PAT I would do in the following way
object network STATIC
host
nat (inside,outside) static dns
object-group network DEFAULT-PAT-SOURCE
network-object
nat (inside,outside) after-auto source dynamic DEFAULT-PAT-SOURCE interface
The Static NAT would be configured as Network Object NAT (Section 2) and the Default PAT would be configured with Twice NAT / Manual NAT (after-auto specifies it as Section 3 rule)
This might sound confusing. Though it would be easier to say what the problem is if we saw the actual NAT configuration. Though I gave the reason that I think is probably one of the most likely reasons if there is some conflict with the 2 NAT rules
You can also check out a NAT document I made regarding the new NAT configuration format and its operation.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-31116
Hope this helps
- Jouni

Code to retrive the sender and receiver interface names using custome adapter module

Hello Team,
I want to develop an custom adapter module which could retrieve the names of the sender and receiver interfaces of the scenario and for that i am trying to use com.sap.aii.af.service.administration.api.monitoring.ProcessContextFactory.ParamSet but i don't know whether this API will support or not and also i don't know how to develop the code using this API so please suggest me some code for it so that i could retrieve the names.
Thanks you all in advance.
Regards,
Avinash.

Hi,
Just ASMA setting will do the needful. Are you planning to rename your target file name. If yes then only you will require UDF.
Update: Since your directory name will be taken from source file name then you have to use mapping for this, else it will not be possible.
I don't know if creating a new module for this will help you solve the issue, but in that case rather creating adapter module, mapping will be easier.
Regards,
Sarvesh
Edited by: Sarvesh Singh on Dec 7, 2009 3:04 PM

MGRE in VRF and Source Interface Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for