MSI tab reports wrong mem size workaround

The problem:
The MSI tab in the display properties panel reported 64 megs instead of 128.
I had installed the drivers that came with the CD in the box (v 31.xx i think), I then removed them and installed
detonator v 41.09 from nvidia, that is when i noticed 64 instead of 128.
I tried removing 41.09 and installing 41.07(from MSI), it didn't make any difference, so I went back to 41.09 and I deleted 'msicpl.dll' to remove the MSI tab.
The Workaround:
1 Download the Detonator Destroyer (do a search)
2 Remove current Drivers with ADD/Remove Programs
3 Run Detonator Destroyer
4 Reboot
5 Choose Standard PCI VGA adapter and reboot if asked
6 Install 41.07 from MSI and reboot if asked
7 Repeat steps 2 to 5
8 Install 41.09
This is what I did and now I'm running 41.09 with the
MSI Tab reporting 128 megs correctly.
If anyone follows these steps without success I apologize for wasting your time.
Keep in mind the Msi Tab it's not a necessity.

Detonator Destroyer is not yet written for XP or 2000.
In your case it worked like a charm because DD supports 98 8)

Similar Messages

DVDSP reports wrong image size?

If I drop a DV-rez clip into DVDSP, then check that clips attributes in the Video Asset browser, it reports it as ~5.8Mb/s and 720x480. But if I drop an Uncompressed SD file into DVDSP - a clip which is recognized by both FCP and the Finder as being 720x486 and Uncompressed 8-bit SD NTSC - it too comes up as ~5.8Mb/s and 720x480. Which is completely wrong. Or am I crazy?
DVDSP 4.1.1.

Ray,
I think I understand what you are trying.
When you start with the image showing 6" rather than 8", I take it you are reading off the rulers on the left and top. Are you sure that there isn't a scroll bar on the right of the picture to move the image to show the bottom 2"? Try using Ctrl & 0 to fit the image to the window.
Do you work with images in floating windows?
The way I would get a 2" border at the bottom is to use Image - Resize Canvas Size and use relative changes.
Add the 2" height and make sure the anchor point is moved up.
Hope that might help
Brian

Xsan Admin reporting wrong volume size

I have an Xsan with 12T in a volume.
Xsan admin report only 4T free. In a Volume folder really it have used 4.5T (information obtain by the command du -h -d 1)but when I have Get Info in Volume, it show me 8T occupied.
Two weeks ago I had a cleanup of the system with cvfsck and the problem was corrected, but in this moment i have the same problem again.
Can you help me?

Did you first see the problem after you upgraded to Xsan 2.2?
Are you running Mac OS X Server 10.5.8 or 10.6.4?

Finder reporting wrong file size

I have a folder I wish to burn, it is 620 meg and has many small files in it, but when I go to burn it through the finder, I get an error that it is 900 meg and will not burn onto 1 disk. Backup tells me I need 3 disks for this folder, why?

I think the issue has to do with the fact that some programs have not adopted the new method yet. Unfortunately programs like iTunes can be used on on operating systems as far back as Tiger which used the old system. I noticed this several months ago and find it very irritating, especially when trying to do things like burn DVDs/CDs and trying to fill them up as much as possible. The only thing you can do about it is provide feedback to Apple at http://www.apple.com/feedback/ and hope they fix it in upcoming releases of their software.

FF401 is taking 215MB of RAM with one tab open can mem usage be made smaller?

System 256MB RAM, PIII, XP PRO, SR3 and all current updates applied. Just installed FF401 and it is taking up most all my memory. Every time I open a new tab FF increases mem size by 10-20MB. Currently one tab open and FF uses 215MB on www.justin.tv

Ok, I found the solution (for at least my boxes!) Yay!
The trouble is that Firefox changed the amount of HTTP connections it permits simultaneously from 30 (pre version 6) up to 256 for version 7. Each connection uses CPU and Memory!!!!!
I won't ponder why they did that, but the fix is easy:
Lower the max number of HTTP connections
In the Location bar, type about:config and press Enter.
The about:config "This might void your warranty!" warning page may appear. Click I'll be careful, I promise!, to continue to the about:config page.
In the Filter box at the top, type network.http.max-connections.
Double-click on the network.http.max-connections preference, the "Enter integer value" dialog box will open.
In the field, type 30 which was the default value in old versions of Firefox and click OK.
My version 7.0.1 firefox suddenly started working! Yay!

Hard drives size reported wrong

My original installation configuration was Windows Xp on raid 0. The hard drives are 2 s-ata 200Gb hdds. In the original config, they reported the correct size (roughly 190Gb formatted).
I have now reformatted the computer to use the drives as two single drives. For some reason, they now show as 128Mb. This happens in windows 2000, Knoppix, and symantec's ghost rescue disk. I'm not sure if I should flash the bios or what. The mobo is MSI K8N Neo-4f

What filesystem was the disc formatted in? Fat16/Fat32 or NTSF? The problem can lay there. Please check and reply back.
Yeah Stick your correct here! Please check that " moan guide " link because it's allways better to have more info about your system spec.
UpNorth

Outlook 2013 reporting the wrong mailbox size

Hi,
I am seeing a problem with Outlook 2013 where the mailbox size under "Mailbox Cleanup" does not reflect the actual mailbox size on Exchange. For instance I have a user that has a mailbox size of 300MB according to Exchange, but her Outlook 2013
is reporting her mailbox size as 2.2GB. Is this a bug in Outlook?
Thanks

Hi,
You can logon OWA to see if the mailbox size displays the same as Outlook does. If no, simply have the user delete the .ost file, Outlook will then recreate the .ost file, try if the mailbox size displays correctly with the new .ost file.
The .ost file may be stored at: C:\Users\user\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Outlook. If you are not sure, go to FILE -> Account Settings -> Account Settings to find its location.
Regards,
Melon Chen
TechNet Community Support

How to count number of columns in cross-tab report

I have created a cross-tab report and have managed to get the data out as below:
             Jan     Feb     Mar....(display of months will auto expand) Avg/Mo Total
UserA     4          3        4                                                                         11
UserB     6          1        1                                                                          8
UserC     5          5        5                                                                         15
Total       15        9        10                                                                        33
I want to insert a calculated column (Avg/Mo) into the cross-tab report based on the formula: Total/Number of Months. I used this calculation formula for Avg.Mo column:
(GridValueAt(CurrentRowIndex, CurrentColumnIndex+1, CurrentSummaryIndex)/GetNumColumns)
However, I get the wrong average since GetNumColumns count the total number of columns including the column of Avg/Mo and Total.
How do i get the number of columns, excluding the Avg/Mo calculated column and Total column?
PS: I can't use hardcode since the number of months/columns will auto expand the months progress...
Edited by: jutamind on May 26, 2010 9:27 AM

ok managed to solve this by slightly changing the formula:
GridValueAt(CurrentRowIndex, CurrentColumnIndex+1, CurrentSummaryIndex)/(GetNumColumns-2)

Hide duplicate rows in Cross Tab report

where can i find the option to hide duplicate rows in cross tab report..?

Is it a limitation with crosstab report..?
Ok, here's the issue i have a crosstab report and its based on a VIEW.
the data duplicates based on created_by and last_updated_by columns as I'm not using these columns in the report.
any ideas or workarounds to avoid duplicates....?
Thanks!

Cross Tab report in RTF

Hi,
I'm trying to create a cross tab report in RTF, it is a time sheet report and the data needs to be print based on the days of week
the report should print in below format
                              Week: Dec 08 TO Dec 14
      Employee                 Sun          Mon          Tue          Wed          Thu          Fri          Sat
                                     Dec08     Dec09       Dec10     Dec11         Dec12     Dec13     Dec14
          EMP1                    0                0               8            0                8
          EMP2                    0                0               8            9               10
I could get the correct grouping of week range and dates, however the number of hours are not printing in correct cell,
for ex. EMP1 has worked 2 days (dec 10th & 11th) but my rtf output is printing that number of hours under Dec 08th & dec 09 th respectively.
Need your help in understanding what is wrong with my RTF template.

The RTF and XML is available in below link,
https://app.box.com/s/vk2tb5xpuce9ccyvpz0c
In the XML the data is available for only a few days for each user, however when there is no working hours for a user in a day of the week we have to keep 0 hrs else the number of hours worked on that day.
Thanks

MSI tabs in Display properties

whenever i try to use the msi tabs in the display properties i get this error
Run a DLL as an App has encountered a problem and needs to close.
and when i click on the button to see what data the error report contains i get this information
AppName: rundll32.exe AppVer: 5.1.2600.0 ModName: msicpl.dll
ModVer: 1.0.0.1 Offset: 00004261
I am running winxp and have re-installed it a few times to see if that would fix the problem, then i tried taking the card out and putting it back in, but no luck either, I have the newest drivers as well and nothing works,
any idea anyone???

Hi guys,
I posted something about this exact problem...
Hi everyone...
I just bought an MSI GF4 TI-4200 128 and have the same problem. Running XPPro, fresh install. I was running MSI GF3 TI-200 64 before with same OS and had no problems with either the properties and the MSI Live Update 2. Now, when I try and access the MSI properties in the Display properties, I get that same error (see at beginning of thread) and the window will close. When I try and use the MSI Auto Update, I get the vbios.dll could not be loaded or found... (or something similar) and can't use the Update. I "bypassed" the problem by loading the NVIDIA drivers instead of the MSI ones and it works like a charm now...
I am pretty sure that the MSI drivers would have worked anyhow but I have'nt tried them. BTW, I can access the NVIDIA properties no problem!
I will also send a request to MSI to let them know that I am now aware of this "known" problem and am awaiting a fix for this... I will also check with ASUS for a motherboard compatibility issue.
XPPRO fully patched
MoBo Asus P4B-533 (latest bios, 1007 I think)
512 DDR-2100
Sound Blaster 128
Maxtor 40gigs 7200
Intel P4 1.7
PS 300W Antec
etc...etc...
To Moderators: Is there a fix for this and if not, could you let me know (by link, email or post) what could be the problem (i.e.: ASUS moBo.)? I am quite content on using NVIDIA drivers but still, my inquisitive nature is acting up...
I haven't tried yet but will I be able to Flash my VGA bios if I have that problem? (is this VGA card related or a compatibility issue with something else?)

Sun Studio 11 install report 0 bytes size of products.

Hi , I'm trying to install Sun Studio into Solaris 8 , but thats report 0 bytes size to be installed and no more messages.
root@saexpintr01# uname -a
SunOS saexpintr01 5.8 Generic_117350-28 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
root@saexpintr01# java -version
java version "1.4.2_12"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_12-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_12-b03, mixed mode)
root@saexpintr01# pwd
Select Locale localized data for the languages showing a checked box will be
installed:
[X] 1 English [en] [CURRENT LOCALE]
[X] 2 Japanese [ja]
[X] 3 Chinese [zh]
To check a particular locale, enter its number, or 0 when you are finished
[0] {"<" goes back, "!" exits}: 0
Select the components you want to install by clicking the radio button in the
Default Install column or Custom Install column. If you choose a Custom
Install, you can select which subcomponents you want to install. To continue,
click Next.
No Install Default Install Custom Install Product
0. [ ] [X] [ ] Solaris patches
1. [ ] [X] [ ] Sun Studio Software
2. [ ] [X] [ ] Documentation
3. [ ] [X] [ ] Source Distribution
4. [ ] [X] [ ] Sun Performance Library
5. Done
Enter the number that corresponds with the product you want to change.
Select the number that corresponds with Done when you are finished. [5] {"<"
goes back, "!" exits} 5
Enter the directory name where you want to install the product.
Studio Software [opt] {"<" goes back, "!" exits} /u01
Checking disk space.
The following items will be installed:
Product: Solaris patches
Location: /u01
Size: 0 bytes
Product: Sun Studio Software
Location: /u01
Size: 0 bytes
Product: Documentation
Location: /u01
Size: 0 bytes
Product: Source Distribution
Location: /u01
Size: 0 bytes
Product: Sun Performance Library
Location: /u01
Size: 0 bytes
Ready to Install
1. Install Now
2. Start Over
3. Exit Installation
What would you like to do [1] {"<" goes back, "!" exits}? 1
Installing Solaris patches
|-1%--------------25%-----------------50%-----------------75%--------------100%|
Installing Sun Studio Software
|-1%--------------25%-----------------50%-----------------75%--------------100%|
Installing Documentation
|-1%--------------25%-----------------50%-----------------75%--------------100%|
Installing Source Distribution
|-1%--------------25%-----------------50%-----------------75%--------------100%|
Installing Sun Performance Library
|-1%--------------25%-----------------50%-----------------75%--------------100%|
Installation details:
Product Result More Info
1. Solaris patches Not Installed Available
2. Sun Studio Software Not Installed Available
3. Documentation Not Installed Available
4. Source Distribution Not Installed Available
5. Sun Performance Library Not Installed Available
6. Done
Enter the number corresponding to the desired selection for more
information, or enter 6 to continue [6] {"!" exits}: 1
/var/sadm/install/logs/Solaris_patches_install.B07191842 does not exist
Failed:
Log file: /var/sadm/install/logs/Solaris_patches_install.B07191842
Product Result More Info
1. Solaris patches Not Installed Available
2. Sun Studio Software Not Installed Available
3. Documentation Not Installed Available
4. Source Distribution Not Installed Available
5. Sun Performance Library Not Installed Available
6. Done
Enter the number corresponding to the desired selection for more
information, or enter 6 to continue [6] {"!" exits}: 6

Hmm... could you just check that you have downloaded the SPARC version of the product? I have seen zero bytes in each cluster when trying to install the "wrong" architecture. Also, there is a gotcha on Solaris 8 - you must have the SUNWbash package (which is on the companion CD for Solaris 8 I believe) otherwise your install will fail. This isn't the symptom of that problem, I'm just mentioning it ahead of time.
--Terry.

Problems with Saved Watermarks - Wrong Font Size

Hi,
I am having problems with "Saved" Watermarks, as when I selected them they have the wrong font size.
I created a Watermark (Draft) to be placed on the lower right
corner of a PDF, using font Arial-10. This watermark has been save using the "Save Settings..." in Watermarks.
When I add this this "saved" watermark to a new PDF, the font size is wrong
(much much bigger), even though the Add Watermark windows reports Arial-10. Only by a selecting a different font size and changing it back to the saved font size (10) I get the correct Font Size in the PDF.
I had a similar problem with the placement, but managed to solve that by setting the Preference>User&Guide to the used Unit (Page&Ruler = centimeters). But for the font size I can't find anything in the preference.
Any Help or Suggestions ?

Hi,
Sorry forgot to add, I am using
Acrobat Professional 8.1.2 on Windows XP Prof.
Cheers
Johannes

MSI Test Reports

I have a quick quetion: How come, the MSI test reports for compatible memory on their motherboards, never show a layup with all four DIMM slots tested.....pretty weird. Just curious.

At least I'm not the only one that sees it that way. I'd kind of like to know the answer to that too. Are we reading it wrong, or have they not thoroughly tested all combinations?
:D
I can understand it on the boards that have three slots and support four banks. You're not always going to be able to populate all the slots. Seems like the dual channel boards are the same way though, which just doesn't seem right. It was my understanding that all slots could be populated with double sided DIMMS on these boards(and I'm pretty sure they can). The test reports don't seem to show that though.

Osx lion get info reporting incorrect file size

Hi all,
I am trying to troubleshoot a strange problem I am having with Adobe Revel. Adobe have been helping me to resolve it but my mac is displaying some odd behaviour which I need to explain and which may be affecting the adobe app.
The adobe app creates a library file of pictures and the file should be growing as I download more pictures. If I right click on the folder and "Get info" the folder size shown is smaller than I would expect at 25MB given that it should contain a good number of Jpeg files.
I have downloaded an app called "Grand Perspective" to help me manage disk space and for this particular file it reports a completely different (much Larger) file size than "Get Info" did (155 MB) which is much closer to what I would expect to find and it is growing as more pictures are downloaded.
Any idea what could cause "Get Info" to report the wrong file size.
I have another osx Lion mac with the same software loaded and although a completely different machine, it reports the same file size for this library folder as grand perspective does.
Any help gratefully accepted.
Slarti

I'm finding the same behaviour running Lion 10.7.2 and the file with the exact same problem as yours is a Sente (bibliography software) library containing references and pdfs. 'Get Info' reports it as 130KB but I know the file is much much larger than that! Even the Size reported on Get Info shows 874.4MB which is still too small. If I 'Show Package Contents' on the file and 'Get Info' on the 'Contents' folder which it then shows, I get the correct size of 1.14GB
Apple Tech Support over the phone wasn't able to explain this behaviour.

MSI tab reports wrong mem size workaround

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for