Multiple POs wrongly linked to SO

Hi,
I have got a Sales order which is wrongly linked to 23 different Purchase orders. The SO created only 1 requisition. But the PO that was dropped from that req is not showing in the document flow of the Sales order. 23 wrong POs are getting displayed in the flow. These POs are showing different Sales order number in the account assignment tab. The requisition# in the line item of these POs are also not the one that has been created from my Sales order.
Kindly let me know if there is any OSS notes for this. Or if anyone can provide some solution, that will be great !
Is there any report available by which I can clean up these wrong POs from the SO flow list.
Regards.
Dwaipayan Bhattacharya

Hi,
You may refer the note: 1654891 - Sales order document flow data not correctly updated
Regards,
AKPT

Similar Messages

Tolerance Limits: Multiple Invoices for single POs, Single Invoices for Multiple POs

Hi,
I'm currently looking at tolerance limit configurations, primarily the DQ (Quantity) and PP (Price) tolerance keys and had a couple of questions where you have the scenario of multiple invoices or multiple POs.
1. If I had multiple invoices for a single PO, collectively they match the quantity and price on the PO; When I enter the first invoice into SAP it will be well below the lower price and quantity limit of the PO as it is one of multiple invoices to be entered. My question is what happens to the invoices in SAP, do you still post them despite the error message and they are just blocked until collectively the invoices match the quantity/price of the PO?
2. If I had an invoice that related to multiple POs, when entering the invoice can I link this to multiple POs?

You don't use user exits or enhancements for this. Use a data transfer routine and assign it to your item level copy control config. Spilt keys are controlled by setting the value of VBRK-ZUKRI. Otherwise, you can use multiple payers or addresses to control it.

MIGO for Multiple POs

Hi Guru's
I need to do migo for multiple POs ( i.e more than 8 PO's)
POs having same material from same vendor differ by QTy.
Is there is any Tcode to achieve this.
Thanks in advance.
regards
Anand

Dear Anand,
In MIGO transaction, Enter the PO's one by one. Once you enter a PO, the line items would get copied and the PO field would become blank. This way, we can enter multiple PO's belonging to a single vendor
for more detail please check this link.
Re: GR for multiple PO
regards,
PRavin Kadam

Overlapping view for /calendar.aspx generate wrong link to tasks

I am using SP2013 on-premise. In a site collection we have built multiple subsites. Each subsite have a calendar. At the root site, we built a calendar control and enabled overlapping view. So that several subsites' calendar can merge into single view.
It works as expected but some tasks' link are wrong.
The wrong link show:
https://sharepoint.com/sites/AAA/Lists/Tasks/DispForm.aspx?ID=16
The correct link should be:
https://sharepoint.com/sites/AAA/Lists/Calendar/DispForm.aspx?ID=16
Is it a known bug or I have configured it in wrong way? Any advice? Thanks.

Hi Mark,
I tested the issue per the steps below:
1.Create a calendar list named Calendar in the site collection, the url is
http://sp:60/sites/first/Lists/Calendar/calendar.aspx .
2.I create a subsite http://sp:60/sites/first/sub1, then create a calendar named Sub1-Calendar, the url is
http://sp:60/sites/first/sub1/Lists/Sub1Calendar/calendar.aspx .
3.Then I create a Calendar Overlay as:
If I click some event in Sub1-Calendar on the overlayed calendar, the url is
http://sp:60/sites/first/sub1/Lists/Sub1Calendar/DispForm.aspx?ID=1 .
All the behaviors are as expected. However, since I created the calendars by default, I'm not sure if there is customization in your situation. I'd suggest you investigate the Task list
https://sharepoint.com/sites/AAA/Lists/Tasks, is it a OOB task list? Are the task items related to the calendar list events?
By the way, please create a simple event on the subsite calendar and go to click the event on the overlayed calendar, see if the url is the correct one.
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Multiple POs Receipt against a single Receipt as per Supplier Invoice

Dear All,
We were using the ERS (Autoinvoice) for suppliers.
We have a special scenario:
We send PO to Supplier. and the Supplier send the Goods for Multiple POs in a Single Supplier Invoice.
The Issue is:
Can we receive all the Supplier Invoice items (belonging to different POs) in a single receipt. So that we can generate one invoice through ERS, which can be matched against the Supplier invoice.
Is this possible? If Yes, How can we accomplish this..?
Please update....
Many thanks in advance....

Hi Jeyakanthan,
Thanks for the reply.
I have gone thru the "Multiple Goods Receipts for a Single Excise Invoice " in Sap Help Documentation, what I have understood is that we can do multiple Goods Receipt against a Single Invoice. Here in this case we do the Goods Receipt against Purchase Order , do the Invoice Capture for first goods receipt againts Purchase Order and we enter the Invoice Number (say 745, sent by the Vendor) while capturing excise invoice. When the second shipment (against the same PO) comes, we do goods receipt and we refer the "Only Refer Excise Invoice" while doing the goods receipt. Finally after when we have entered all the shipments for the PO, we do the Excise Posting.
Here in our case we have already posted the Goods Receipt (without entering the Invoice Number in first goods receipt) and now we want to capture & post excise invoice for a Single Excise Invoice (Invoice No. say 745,).
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
Here we have got two options:
a. Reverse all the goods receipt & re-enter the goods receipt .
b. post two separate excise invoice against each goods receipt mentioning dummy excise invoice number like 745-A & 745-B.
Option a seems difficulty as we will have to reverse all the subsequent goods receipt & transfer posting documents.
Option b seems legally wrong, as per understanding.
Request you to please advise.
Regards
PK

I have iPhone 4s, and using latest iOS. When I try to open any link from Twitter or Facebook, it goes to open some wrong webpage. My iphone seems to be infected or suffering from some spyware or malware. How can I remove this wrong link opening

I have iPhone 4s, and using latest iOS. When I try to open any link from Twitter or Facebook, it goes to open some wrong webpage. My iphone seems to be infected or suffering from some spyware or malware. How can I remove this wrong link opening ? Please help me to resolve...

I think the McAfee suite will do the trick when I pay them a one-time fee of $69 or $179 for a year for unlimited support.
Your call of course but IMO a waste of money. Please read this first:
There are many forms of ‘Malware’ that can affect a computer system, of which ‘a virus’ is but one type, ‘trojans’ another. Using the strict definition of a computer virus, no viruses that can attack OS X have so far been detected 'in the wild', i.e. in anything other than laboratory conditions. The same is not true of other forms of malware, such as Trojans. Whilst it is a fairly safe bet that your Mac has NOT been infected by a virus, it may have another security-related problem, but more likely a technical problem unrelated to any malware threat.
You may find this User Tip on Viruses, Trojan Detection and Removal, as well as general Internet Security and Privacy, useful:
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-2435
The User Tip (which you are welcome to print out and retain for future reference) seeks to offer guidance on the main security threats and how to avoid them.
More useful information can also be found here:
http://www.reedcorner.net/mmg/

Single ERS Invoice for multiple POs with different GS and same IP

Dear All,
I have a Requirement as per the below scenario:
We need to have single invoice created using ERS (MRRL) functionality in the below scenario:
Two POs created with different Partner function GS (goods supplier) and same IP (Invoice party partner function).
Ex:
GS IP PO GR ERS
vendor1 10001 4500001 500001 Yes ( GR-IV-Yes, GR done- Yes, same payment terms - 001)
vendor2 10001 4500002 500002 Yes ( GR-IV-Yes, GR done- Yes, same payment terms - 001)
When I run ERS for last 1 week (GR) and select the option (Doc selection – per IP or other criteria like GRs posted in last one week) , system should create 1 invoice document. Standard SAP posts 2 documents for each GS.
I have tried using 2 user exits for MRRL, but none of them work for this functionality.
Thanks,

Hi,
Go for MIRO without MRRL.
Instead ERS, you can post single Invoice(MIRO) for multiple POs for one vendor.
OR
Check with Technical consultant and go for development to have single ERS output for multiple ERS invoice documents for single vendor.
Regards,
Biju K

SCs split into multiple POs, duplicate POs and PO items in reverse c/ to SC

Hi,
We are on SRM Server 550 SP10 ECS. We are facing the following situations intermittently in Prod. We are unable to simulate the same situation in Dev or Q environment. Again this does not happen for every SC it happens atleast once or twice in a day with a volume of few hundred shopping carts.
1) SC gets split into as many POs as SC Items. Let us say SC has 4 items, each item is created in one PO so we will have 4 POs w/ one item per PO in this example.
2) PO gets duplicated. Let us say SC has two items. Then two POs are created with identical SC items referencing the same SC
3) PO items are either jumbled or reversed in comparison to SC. Let us say in a SC you have 3 items in SC then the PO will contain items in say 3 ,2 , 1 order or 2, 3 1 order.
These POs are automaticaly created after Approval (no sourcing cockpit). The vendor, Purchasing Org, Document Type etc is same for all items in SC.
Anothe question: Once the approval of the SC happens in Workflow, the PO is automatically created via BAPI? or some job? Can anybody clarify the process that takes place from the Approval to PO creation (assuming the SC does not go to SOCO).
Thanks

Hi
Which R/3 and SRM support pqack versions are you using ?
Following is the criteria which is used to split POs
For Backend Purchase Orders
Company Code
Purchasing Org
Purchasing Group
Document Type
Vendor
Subtype (Direct/Hierarchy)
FI Logical System
Logical System from where an External Requirement comes
For Local Purchase Orders additional criteria is used to split POs:
Delivery Address (for higher releases)
Procument Card Number
Procurement Card Company
Please Check the Implementation of BADI BBP_SC_TRANSFER_BE (Method GROUP_PO) for any Customer Added Splitting Criteria. Please look at SAP documenatation of the Business Add-In BBP_SC_TRANSFER_BE, its Method GROUP_RQ and GROUP_PO. You can use to overwrite the standard and group SC items based on custom rules to create split the PO or RQ in EBP.
P.S. As soon as the purchaser assigns different SOS in the SC, you'll have different POs created.
Meanwhile, please go through the following pointers / SAP OSS Notes as well ->
Note 768164 - Multiple SCs via SoCo are processed incorrectly
Note 1057530 - BBPSC02: Incorrect PO split when SC contains direct material
Note 861889 - Limitations on limit and service PO's in case of ECS
You order a shopping cart with couple of items with same data (such as vendor etc). One of the item is a direct material. When you order the cart, the PO split criteria is creating multiple POs instead of a single PO.
Re: Incorrect PO Split in SoCo? (which FM should I debug ?) :-(
Re: S.Cart creates Split PO, One S.Cart creates multiple PO's for each SC item
How to split shopping cart qty to create two PO
Re: PO split in sourcing cockpit ? :-(
Split PO in SRM
Re: Creating single PO from multiple SC
SC gets split into one PO per Line even when the vendor is the same.
Hope this will help. Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Creating Multiple POs from the shopping cart

Hi
I have a requirement to create multiple POs from shopping cart. we are in SRM 7.0 I have implemented the BADI BBP_SC_TRANSFER_BE GROUP_PO method. modified group_1 field with 1 and Doc_type with custom document type
and udpate the change parameter CT_PROC_ITEM with the above changed data for each line item.
But purchase order always taking original document type and its number range only.
Please help me in this regard,
Regards,
Rama.

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I have implemented the BADI BBP_BS_GROUP_BE method GROUP_PO_BACKEND. I modified BE_DOC_TYPE with the custom document type and REFNUMBER as the group number .
But it is generating number range for the original document type only. when i debug the code i found that it is taking original document type (which is hardcoded contant value mentioned in the code when number range is initial).
Please suggest me after grouping the line items with document types and REFNUMBER how to assign number ranges for each group of line items.
Regards,
Rama.

Creating Multiple POs for Contract

Dear Team,
Our Company has Yearly budget Allocation.
For longterm Contracts (Say 3 Years),we are facing Porblem in creating Multiple POs from the Contract.
The PO with ref to Contract can be created only for this Year as only Sufficient Budget is allocated for the current year.
For next year another PO need to be raised for Subsequent year.
The users need to make sure they have to Plan the budget for the next yesr to Process the PO.
Is there any way to address this issue.
Apperciating ur ideas.
Regards
Zulfikar

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I have implemented the BADI BBP_BS_GROUP_BE method GROUP_PO_BACKEND. I modified BE_DOC_TYPE with the custom document type and REFNUMBER as the group number .
But it is generating number range for the original document type only. when i debug the code i found that it is taking original document type (which is hardcoded contant value mentioned in the code when number range is initial).
Please suggest me after grouping the line items with document types and REFNUMBER how to assign number ranges for each group of line items.
Regards,
Rama.

Vendor invoie for multiple POs with different payment terms

Hi,
We have a vendor which send a single invoice for multiple POs which have different payment terms. Now if we create a single invoice in MIRO, then only a payment term can be applied.
However user want to pay to the vendor corresponding to the PO terms.
Please let us know any way apart from creating multiple MIRO documents.
Regds,
Nand

Hi,
You can achieve so in standard SAP.
Go to OBY6 and activate the check box "Enable Amount Split" in your company code. Then in MIRO, a new tab will appear in the header as "Amount Split"
In this tab, you can split the vendor invoice in multiple lines with respective payment method and payment term.
I hope this will help you.
Regards,
Gaurav

SRM 7 - Multiple POs from 1 Shopping Cart

Hi Everyone,
Is it possible to create multiple POs from 1 shopping cart? 1st PO will have partial order qty and the second PO will have the remaining order quantity.
Thanks.

Hi Everyone,
Is it possible to create multiple POs from 1 shopping cart? 1st PO will have partial order qty and the second PO will have the remaining order quantity.
In SRM7, it is not possible to create multiple POs from one SC. In sourcing you can combine multiple SC's (using BAdI BBP_SRC_DETERMINE) and process to create a single PO.
Also the BAdI BBP_GROUP_LOC_PO is used for :
If the shopping cart items do not have a source of supply, the standard system creates a purchase order with one purchase order item for each shopping cart item. This is necessary because once a source of supply is assigned to purchase order, the items can no longer be divided up between different purchase orders.
You use this Business Add-In if you want to create a single purchase order for particular shopping cart items that do not have a source of supply assigned to them.
So if your SC has 2 or more line items, then it can be processed in sourcing for multiple PO based on above logic.
But if your SC has one line item, then splitting of qty for multiple PO is not possible.
Hope this clarifies your query.
Regards,
Ram

Multiple POs in MIRA

Hi folks,
we are on IS-Retail and business has a requirement wherein they want to upload multiple POs at a single shot in the MIRA screen
Currently, MIRA allows to populate only 8 POs at a time and then we have to scroll down to upload another 8...
Has anyone solved such a scenario using an existing note or a possible ZMIRA without much complications???
I hear from my ABAP folks that mimicking MIRA would compromise a lot of functionality available in its ECC 6.0 version with enhancement spots.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks

Dear,
Did you check by press F4. While cursor in purchasing document press F4 and select vendor/s and go to document number where you can select as many numbers of POs you want and paste them.
I tried in Quality with limited data and working fine. Please check.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Why is Firefox STILL allowing website drive by browser hijacking by LAME "Your broswer has been blocked" exploit-NO other malware-just clicked the wrong link.

This silly ass "window-won't-close-just-keeps-relaunching" exploit is so ancient it has whiskers.
Incredibly embarrassed that this happened to my friend, since I was the one that encouraged him to use Firefox in the first place.
... and NO he didn't install any malicious .EXE -or- Pluggins -or- Extensions, just clicked the wrong link in trying to cancel a pop-up that Firefox should never have allowed in the first place.
I say this because, from reading this Forum for YEARS now, this is generally the point where the totally lame "Well there well always be ways to "human engineer" these kinds of exploits..." excuses start, so let's not even go there.
Instead of resisting this attack, Firefox makes it WORSE, because if you open task manager and kill Firefox, then Firefox sees that as a CRASH, and tries to coverer it's tracks by automatically re-launching the previous session (instead of the PROPER behavior, which would be to load the standard user-prompted selective-restore page).
Frankly, as I mentioned above, this is embarrassingly BAD...
Just try to close a pop-up window (that shouldn't have 'popped up' in the first place) and your lame-o broswer locks up and helps some con-man try to scam you for $500.
PATHETIC. This kind of thing is the reason I dumped MS Explorer long ago.
I have been a strong Firefox supporter since the very beginning, so I'm not trying to raise any hackles here, but finding boneheaded serious security vulnerabilities like this, while Firefox developers are wasting time making the the 'new' Firefox interface more like the piece-of-garbage Windows 8 Explorer interface (which I DESPISE), has caused me to loose faith in Mozilla, so can someone suggest some alternatives other than Firefox and Chrome?
Seriously, I'm not looking to fight about it, run your project any way you want, but some help in picking an alternative browser that I can trust would be greatly appreciated.

''richsopn [[#answer-714480|said]]''
<blockquote>
What's this have to do with Mozilla? - because Canonical's lack of updates should be no problem, right? - Hey just click that little 'auto updates' button under 'advanced options' on your Windows PC's right? -- Oh, sorry Linux users, despite the Linux roots of many of Mozilla's developers, and the many critical Linux spawned tools they use daily to create Firefox, Mozilla apparently feels Linux users are SECOND CLASS CITIZENS WHO ARE JUST NOT WORTH SUPPORTING WITH DIRECT UPDATES LIKE THEY PROVIDE FOR PC USERS.
Support they get from Canonical '''and Mozilla''' -> ZERO
... and I'm not talking about some guy who runs a geeky, totally insecure 'non-official repository' I'm talking about a simple check-box that I can click, and continue to get updates directly from Mozilla.
</blockquote>
The build you have is a third-party build and not one provided by Mozilla and Mozilla does not provide updates for third-party builds they did not well build.
Mozilla does support Linux and still strongly do as they have both 32-bit and 64-bit builds including for Release. www.mozilla.org/firefox/all
They get Firefox updates just like on Windows as long as the Firefox has red/write permissions as a easy way around for the user is to have it in /home
Since you are using a five year old version of Ubuntu you need to meet minimum package requirements at least. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/37.0.1/system-requirements/
Heck Mozilla supports Linux and Mac OSX better when it comes to 64-bit Firefox as there were 64-bit Releases for Linux and Mac ever since Firefox 4.0 while for Windows the first Win64 Release ''may'' be finally at Firefox 38.0
If you prefer say Gnome 2 and want to stay away from say Gnome 3 and Unity in newer Linux distros then look into say Xfce as it is both light and can look very much like Gnome 2 and can use gtk2 themes.

Query: how to avoid multiple POs from being combined into delivery

Hi all,
We are working on an enhancement.
The requirement is:
We need to avoid multiple POs from being combined into one delivery.
Any pointers in this regard would be highly appreciated.
regards
Gurpreet

Hi Murali,
I think your suggestion should solve Gurpreets problem.
I have a query here.
In the copy controls VLTA, defines between sales doc to dlivery doc.
Here we want to maintain copy control between purchasing doc to delivery doc.
How do we achive this?
Also in my view we should write a new combination requirement.
Please check if combination requirement 51 can be used?
Regards
Abhishek

Multiple POs wrongly linked to SO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for