Multiple Preq for MTO scenario

experts,
I have a sales order in receiving plant , after every MRP run, it gives rise to a new PReq , in a MTo scenario,
Special procurement key is 40 and availability check is 02 in the receiving plant. Can anybody advise why this is happening and required steps to correct it.

Hi,
Sales order will generate the requirements. P Req will creation depends on which option you choosed in "Create Purchase req" in MRP Run. In Material has Specical Procurement key in Rec Plant means it is procuring material from the other plant. when you run MRP in recieving plant it generates STO PR.
and you are not specified what you are looking for.
regards
Siva Reddy

Similar Messages

Moving Average Price and Total Stock not updated for MTO scenario

We are using MTO with planning strategy 20, individual collective indicator is 1 (individual requirement only) and price control is V for finished goods. We are facing the following problems after we perform GR of above FG from MFBF (Repetitive -run schedule header):
1)Total Stock field (LBKUM)in Accounting View 1 remain as blank but the sales order stock is appear in Stock Overview screen.
2)Moving average price does not updated after periodic settlement is carried out.
It seem that problem can only be resolved if we change the planing strategy to MTS (ex:40), appreciate that if any of you can provide the solution.
p/s: on ECC5 system.

Hi,
Good morning and greetings,
The standard SAP says as below
The Raw Materials should have MAP 'V' and the SFG and FG should have the price control as 'S' basically because the standard costing variant PPC1 uses the sequence of Standard Price as the first update at the time of price update and settlement.
I presume MFBF is used for Repetitive Manufacturing and not for MTO scenario...Repetitive Manfuacturing is MTS scenario...Goods receipt of production order is normally done through MB31.
If you still want to use the MAP for FG and SFG then you will have to change the costing variant appropriately to pick the MAP first at the time of goods receipt and settlement.
Please reward points if found useful.
Thanking you
With kindest regards
Ramesh Padmanabhan

Planning Strategies for MTO scenario

i have an FG which has strategy 20 assigned to it. I have an SFG which i want to link to the sales order. i also want the planned order to be generated to capture the minimum and maximum lot size and not generate on per requirement basis. example for the semi-finished, a sales order needs a reqt of 20, but min and max lot size is 12000, planned order should be 12000. how do i do this?

Hi Raf,
as you know that, for MTO Scenario the Lot sizin will be EX and no other settings are allowed.
But there is a provision fulfill the requirement.
Now in the Transaction: OMI4 for the lot size : EX
For MTO Lot size select 1 Lot-for-lot with rounding
Maintain the rounding value in the MRP Views as per your requirement like 12000 PC.
Now every time system tries to round it to 12000.
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Siva

Steps for execution of valuated and unvaluated for MTO scenario

Hi,
Can any one provide the steps for execution of valuated and unvaluated for MTO scenario.
regards,
RAM

Hi,
Please find below the details about Valuated and non-valuated Sale Order scenarios:
SAP Scenario 1 - Valuated Sale Order Stock u2013 with Sale Order Controlling u2013 (MTO, ATO and ETO with VC)
1     Enquiry
2     Opportunity
3     Quotation (Creation and Approval). In case of ETO u2013 BPO is created and updated in quotation (condition type)
4     Creation of Sale Order
5     MRP Run u2013 Creation of Planned Order u2013 Creation of Production Order and Purchase Order
6     External Procurement u2013 Goods Receipt     ROH Inventory A/c Dr (BS)
     To GR/IR A/c Cr (P&L)
7     Material Consumption to Production Order     In FI:
ROH con. A/c Dr (P&L)
    To ROH Inventory A/c Cr (BS)
Same is the case with HALB
In CO:
Cost of Material is debited to Production Order
8     Activity Consumption to Production Order     No FI Posting
In CO:
Production Order is debited and cost center is credited with activity cost
9     Goods Receipt from Production Order     FG Inventory A/c Dr (BS)
   To COGM A/c Cr (P&L)
10     Delivery to customer     In-Transit A/c   Dr. (BS)
   To FG Inventory A/c Cr (BS)
11     Invoicing to customer     In FI:
Customer A/c Dr (BS)
   To Revenue A/c Cr (P&L)
COGS A/c   Dr (P&L)
    To In-Transit A/c Cr (BS)
In CO:
COGS and Revenue are posted to COPA
     Period end closing u2013 Production Order
12     Revaluation of activity prices     Production Order and Cost Center will be debited or credited as the case may be
13     Calculation of WIP     In FI:
WIP A/c Dr. (BS)
To Change in WIP A/c Cr (P&L)
If the Order is completed:
In FI:
Change in WIP A/c   Dr(P&L)
   To WIP A/c Cr (BS)
14     Calculation of Variances     Variances are Calculated on the Production Order. No FI or CO entries
15     Settlement to Sale Order     Production Order and Sales Order will get debited/credited depending on whether they are positive or negative variances
Period end closing u2013 Sale Order
16     Result analysis at Sale Order     Result Analysis run will identify the status of the sale order and will enable the postings to COPA at the time of settlement
17     Settlement of Sale Order
In FI:
Variances A/c Dr (P&L)
To COGS Account Cr (P&L)
(It would be otherwise if variances are positive)
In CO:
COGS, Revenue and Variances are settled to COPA
SAP Scenario 2 u2013 Non-valuated Sale Order Stock u2013 with Sale Order Controlling
Process Step     Business Process Flow     Value Flow u2013 FI/CO
1     Enquiry
2     Opportunity
3     Quotation (Creation and Approval)
4     Creation of Sale Order
5     MRP Run u2013 Creation of Planned Order u2013 Creation of Production Order and Purchase Order
6     External Procurement u2013 Goods Receipt     In FI:
Consumption A/c   Dr (P&L)
   To GR/IR A/c Cr (P&L)
In CO:
Material costs will directly get posted to Sale Order
7     Material Consumption to Production Order     Not applicable
8     Activity Consumption to Production Order     In FI:
No Entry
In CO:
Activity Costs are posted to Production Order
9     Goods Receipt from Production Order     Only Material Document for movement of goods will be there. The stock is neither valuated in CO nor in FI
10     Delivery to customer     Just goods movement from sale order stock to customer. No value postings in FI and CO
11     Invoicing to customer     In FI:
Customer A/c Dr (BS)
   To Revenue Cr (P&L)
In CO:
COGS and Revenue get posted to Sale Order
     Period end closing u2013 Production Order
12     Revaluation of activity prices     Prodn Order and Cost Center will be debited or credited as the case may be
13     Calculation of WIP     No WIP
14     Calculation of Variances     No Variances
15     Settlement of costs to Sale Order     All the costs accumulated in Production Order gets collected to Sale Order
16     Settlement of Variances     No Variances in Production Order
     Period end closing u2013 Sale Order
17     Result analysis at Sale Order     In FI
WIP A/c Dr. (BS)
To Change in WIP A/c Cr (P&L)
If the Order is completed:
Change in WIP A/c   Dr (P&L)
   To WIP A/c Cr (BS)
No CO postings will happen
18     Settlement of Sale Order     COGS, Revenue and other direct sale order related values will get posed to PA.
Best Regards
Surya

For MTO scenario,multi level bom is not working sap afs pp

Hi Experts,
              We are implementing MTO scenario for our client. I have maintained strategy group for FERT is 40 and strategy group for HALB and ROH are 20.
               For single level BOM , requirements is not getting generates properly.
              I would like to know What are all the settings is required to create AFS BOM.(single and multi level)
               Please suggest me.
Thanks & Regards,
Deepika.

Hello Deepika,
As we know AFS materials are planned at SKU level (Grid and stock categories) you can use AFS MRP (/N/AFS/MD02) only.
Please refer OSS note Note 981747 - FAQ - AFS Production Planning
Question 5 Made-To-Order Planning -Multi-Level (MD50) does not work for AFS Materials and Sales Orders containing AFS materials.
Answer: Made to Order Multi level planning functionality was never enhanced for AFS and hence transaction MD50 is not supported.
Steps are as,
1. Create a MTO/PTO sales order for an AFS material.
2. Run AFS MRP using transaction code /AFS/MD02.
3. Convert the planned order to production order.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Sales order to consider for MTO scenario

Hi PP experts
How to ensure the consideration of sales order requirements for MTS or MTO.
Is it possible to distinguish by order types.
I request please indicate the config requirements for this.
warm regards
sairam akundi

Sairam,
I am not sure as to what excatly you are looking for.
However please note the following with respect to sales order requirements for MTO and MTS:
For MTO: The requirements type in the procurement tab of the sales order should be KE or any other requirements type that supports procurement from sales requirements. To be able to enter the KE requirements type in the sales order the material master should have Planning strategy group which suppotrs MTO Example: 20 which is specified in the MRP3 view.
For MTS: The requirements type in the procurement tab would be KSL or any other which supports make to order. The Planning strategy group for this in material master should be 10.
The configurations for this include the
1) configuration of the Planning strategy group which contains a list of planning
strategies allowed.
2) configuration of individual strategies which combine the requirements types from Production and Sales. The requirements class which is keyed in the requirements type determines excatly how the planning and procurement occurs.
The above configurations are pre-defined in standard SAP. You could change them if you require to.
Check the configs under:
SPRO>SD>Basic functions>Av check and transfer of requirements.
With the above basic settings, in case of MTO sales order would drive the production. In case of MTS production is carried based on forecast values (Planned independent requiremts irrespective of sales order requirements). The warehouse stock is then allocated to the sales order at the time of delievry.
For more help check the SAP online help on Planning strategies.
Hope above is useful.
Regards
Ram

Subcontracting process for MTO scenario

Dear Sir ,
In my company one scnario comes , in which we are making MTO sales order for customer , some item of BOM of finished goods I have to provide to the subcontracting vendor for making semifinished goods .
How I can do this activity according to SAP point , as subcontracting vendor stock is represented with specail indicatior O and sales order stock with E.
Please help to get rid off this issue.
thanks & regards
Shailendra

check these links http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/4d/2b90b043ad11d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/V5600/BBLibrary/HTML/150_EN_IN.htm
Edited by: anjali s on Apr 28, 2009 12:57 PM

HU02 in MTO Scenario

Hi ,
i have created SO->
i have run MRP.->
I have confirmed production order.->
i have done GR with MB31(movement type 101)
But, When i am packing that material in HU02 its giving error as
Batch 20027725 1310 2000 11 doesnot exist.
where,
20027725-material
1310-Plant
2000-FG Storage location
11-Batch no.
is it possible to pack material in HU02 for MTO Scenario??? or we have to use COWBPACK & COWBHUWE T-codes???
kindly guide
Regards,
Amol

Madan,
Automatic Reorder Point Planning
In automatic reorder point planning, both the reorder level and the safety stock level are determined by the integrated forecasting program.
The system uses past consumption data (historical data) to forecast future requirements. The system then uses these forecast values to calculate the reorder level and the safety stock level, taking the service level, which is specified by the MRP controller, and the material's replenishment lead time into account, and transfers them to the material master.
Since the forecast is carried out at regular intervals, the reorder level and the safety stock level are continually adapted to the current consumption and delivery situation. This means that a contribution is made towards keeping stock levels low.
So you need to maintain the forecast view for the material. The forecast values comes from consumption data. If the system in place for some time then consuption data will be automatically by the system based on the material issues. I am not sure if you can enter the consumption manually.
Regards
Ram

CTM Order Selection MTO scenario

Hi,
I have cfreated a Sales Order in ECC with Requirement Strategy as Made To Order and CIFed the order to APO.
The order is getting CIFed and is reflecting in APO.
The issue is that when I try to do Demand Simulation using CTM the order is not getting recognised.
Is their some setting that needs to be done in case Sales Order for MTO scenario.
Please help me in this regards.
Thanks,
Sanjog

Hi Sanjog,
can you see the sales order in APO (/sapapo/rrp3).
please maintain in the demand prioritization profile the category for this sales order and then try simulating the demands.
let me know if it works.
Thanks
Binod

Error While doing settlement for Sale Order in MTO scenario

Hi,
In MTO Scenario - when i try to settle Sales Order i am getting the below error. Even i have maintained the settlement cost element for PSG in allocation structure A1.
Kindly help me
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type PSG
Message no. KD506
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area BP01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type PSG.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
Thanks
Kishore

Hi
Please check your allocation structure , it looks that settlement cost element that you have assigned in the allocation strcuture is not having correct cost element category.
Go to Allocation structure configuration (OKO6) and check your allocation structure A1.
check settlement cost elements is it by cost element or you have assigned separate cost element for settlement.
if you wants to settle with same cost element select By cost element.
if you wants to settle with different cost element create a cost element and assign settlement cost element.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di46c2/helpdata/EN/9d/1f4b6e5733d1118b3f0060b03ca329/frameset.htm
hope this helps you.
Regards

No Accounting Document generated for goods issue in case of MTO scenario

Hi all,
I have MTO scenario & the industry is trading. So I have all trading goods. In SPRO - Sales & Distribution - Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements - Transfer of Requirements - Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction I have determined requirement type as KE.
In material master I have used strategy group as 20 for Make to order scenario. In the settings "Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction" I have determined the requirement type as "KE".
The requirement type "KE" determines a requirement class "040 - MkToOrdNoValW/o cons". Here the account assignment category is "E-Ind. cust. w. KD-CO".
Now I created a sales order, the system determined the requirement type as "KE". I saved the sales order, assigned the stock to the sales order & created a delivery.
I did the PGI also. But when I check in the document flow, for the material document the system has not generated any FI document where we see the accounting document for the "cost of goods sold" & "inventory" G/L accounts. The system gives a message "Material document 4900000023 does not include an accounting document".
Note:
1. When I create the sales order with normal MTS scenario, the system creates an accounting document for the material document at the time of goods issue.
2. The valuation class in the material is 3100 for trading goods.
3. The following settings have been made in OBYC.
for GBB, the G/L accounts have been assigned for general modifier "BSA", "VAX", "VAY" & "VKA".
Please suggest me as to where i am missing any settings.
With best regards,
Niyaz Sayyed.

Dear Niyaz Sayyed
You need to check in the following areas:-
- check whether the material is defined as non-valuated stock
- go to OME9, select your Account Assignment and see whether you have checked the box "GR non-valuated". It should not have been checked
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Special MTO Scenario - Costing Issues

Hi,
Not sure if I should post it here or in the FI / CO forum, but here it is ...
I'm in the process of implementing APO in a Aerospace company in Montréal, Canada and we're stuck on an Account Assignment Planning, and Product Costing issue.
Today, all demand / production / movements / costing is done by creating a Project Network.
Here are the current settings:
- Create a project with activities for each major "line section" for major components.
- Each activity has a component allocated to it
- Each activity has a different WBS element assigned to it.
- All production orders/purchase orders/goods movements are created/posted against the WBS elements.
- All stock for MTO parts are assigned to the WBS element
In order to provide better integration with APO and bring more flexibility in the Planning and Simulation processes, we were hoping to stop using Project Networks as the trigger for demand / planning / execution. The idea was to use Sales Orders (or Customer Independent Requirements - CIR) to generate the demand and run APO and MRP planning from it. The special stock segment now becomes linked to the sales order (or CIR) which changes alot of thing in the accounting documents and costs elements in the whole planning and execution processes.
Here is what we were hoping to achieve in order to limit impacts on finance :
- we are implementing APO and would like planning to be performed without using project networks.
- we would like to have planned orders for the top level for long term and be able to trigger the purchasing of long lead time items.
- we would like all goods movements (PO reception, GI to production order etc, ) to be posted to WBS elements
- we would like all production orders to settle to WBS elements
We tried different scenarios with different account assignments categories, but could not find one that fits the bill :
1) we tried using account assignment category "D" which allows assignment to sales order and WBS element. We created CIR as demand.
The problem is the stock is non-valuated which resulted in having no accounting documents for goods issue to production order.
2) we tried account assignment category "Q" with using CIR as demand. We had one WBS element assignment in the CIR. When we changed the WBS value in planned orders to represent each "line section" we ended up with duplicate demand in the original segment and the new segment.
So, is there a scenario with valuated stock that would allow us to do a make-to-order process that would post all costs to WBS?
Thanks,
Marc

Hi, sorry for the title confusion ... I cannot change it anymore.
I'm not sure I understand what you are proposing.
In our case, the problem is not really linked to the CIFing to APO but more on the Account Assignment Category in ECC and the Customer / Project Stock Segment in MRP.
Since we have a multiple level BOM and that the intermediate levels need to be associate with different WBS element according to major parts of the aircraft.
Here is an example :
Aicraft -- Has its own BOM with major parts as sub assemblies,
Major Parts -- Each Major Parts needs to be linked to a different WBS for costing purpose.
Minor Sub Assemblies -- All cost of producing the Minor Sub Assemblies should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
Components -- All components costs and accounting documents should be tracked inside the Major Parts WBS.
We know that by using a project Network for the Aircraft Level we could create activities for each Major Parts with different WBS, but since we want to do planning in APO, we were hoping to not use PS has a scheduling basis. The integration of PS in APO is still not used a lot and the flexibility of Projects in planning processes is not great.
In resume, we are trying to create the demand from a Sales Order or CIR, but manage costs and accounting documents within WBS for all level in order to limit impacts on the Finance Department.

Multiple Queries for sales

Hello Gurus,
I have multiple queries for SD, Kindly help me out.
1: We send 50 quantities to client using (Post Goods issue) and when client receives the material he says their are only 48 quantities and 2 quantities are missing. I this scenario what we suppose to do , If i send my client 2 more quantities then my store shows 52.
2: We have 3 stores and we are using MTO scenario when client calls us for finish goods we select store 100 in sales order after production our production department send some finished goods in store 100 some in 200 and the remaining in 300. now in this scenario what i suppose to do when i create delivery with respect to Sales order it shows store 100.
3: Unit Conversion Client ask for 54500 small boxes , I make Sales order of small boxes but when i make delivery it shows like this
Description TYPE UNIT Packing Quantity
finish goods small boxes MasterBox(Big Box) 109(small box) 500 54500
Means in 1 Big Box i have to Pack 500 Small boxes and deliver to my client . Now 109 Big Boxes Multiply 500 small Boxes = 54500
Regards

1: We send 50 quantities to client using (Post Goods issue) and when client receives the material he says their are only 48 quantities and 2 quantities are missing. I this scenario what we suppose to do , If i send my client 2 more quantities then my store shows 52.
Book that a loss in transit for 2 quantities & do subsequent delivery free of charge for the new 2 quantities.
3: Unit Conversion Client ask for 54500 small boxes , I make Sales order of small boxes but when i make delivery it shows like this
Description TYPE UNIT Packing Quantity
finish goods small boxes MasterBox(Big Box) 109(small box) 500 54500
I assume you are not using handling units for this scenario.
Refer following w/o handling units.
You need 2 separate UoM for Big & Small Box.
Say
Small Box
ZSB
|Big Box|ZBB|
Use UoM Box as reference
In material master - Additional Data - Units of Measure, maintain
100
ZSB
Small Box
<=>
1
ZBB
Big Box
And also,
In Sales:Sales Org1, General Data
Base Unit of Measure
ZSB
Sales unit
ZBB
Regards
JP

How can we assign a different scope of planning in MTO scenario?

Hi,
We are using MTO scenario. In this case, during sales order creation checking control AE is getting triggered. We want to use a different scenario during rescheduling transaction. But as per my analysis, V_V2 is also calling the same AE checking control eventhough we assigned a different checking control for Back order processing.
In this case, can we assign a different checking control (scope of check) for back order processing?
Regards.

Let me explain my requirement here....
This is a kind of trading or sub-contracting. Initially we will give the forecast to vendor...but Vendor will start the finished product production only after getting the confirmed order from us. Hence we thought to use strategy 50. So we will create a PO to Vendor only after getting a confirmed sales order from customer.
But in strategy 50 ATP confirmation is based on PIR. Hence we created a new requirement class (copy of 45 with ATP active). So in this new strategy ATP is against actual receipts instead of PIRs.
But sometimes Vendor may not be able to supply as per lead-time...and he may postpone the delivery date. In this case we are getting exception message 10 for the PO...even though PO is specific to a sales order. Still rescheduling job (V_V2) is not populating the new confirmation date as it is referring to the TRLT.
Hence we want to use ATP based on TRLT during sales order creation. And during rescheduling we want to use a different scope of check ('without TRLT' and with 'No storage location check'). Hence we created a new checking rule for rescheduling and this we assigned for that specific plant.
As per my observation, rescheduling job is not picking the scope of check that is assigned for rescheduling....it is calling the same checking rule AE during rescheduling also.
So my question here is... can we call a different scope of check during rescheduling run while using make to order strategy?
Regards.

Multiple alerts for the same Message ID

Hi
I have configured outbound ftp adapter. I have configured alerts inorder to capture any error in the adapter engine.
Now,alert is triggered showing an error in the ftp adapter ( say incorrect ftp details). But i get multiple alerts for the same message ID several times. I have also set the parameter Max No od Delvs to 1 in the ALRTCATDEF transaction.
I keep getting the same alert number of times a day. How can i restrict the number of alerts to 1 for 1 message ID.
Regards,
Vani

Hello Andreas,
Thanks for your reply.
In my scenario i would need an alert per Message. That is the reason why I have not checked the option "Supress Multiple Alerts" since it would allow only alert per rule.
Is there is any way we can get one alert per message.
Also, after correcting the eror in the file adapter will the file which was not placed due to error in the adapter be placed automatically. I wanted to know what would happen to the lost file or unprocessed file since it dint reach the destination due to error.
Regards,
Vani

Multiple Preq for MTO scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for