Multiple Service GR/IR clearing account

Hi,
We have a Business requirement where i need to have different G/L accounts for Different nature of service. That is there will be different Service clearing account for Foreign, Domestic & other services.
At present the WRX key is having the Service clearing account maintained against Valuation class as BLANK.No valuation class is maintained against the account
Is it possible to do in standard Multiple Service Clearing account.
Regards
John

Hi ,
Yes it is possible to maintain different Clearing account for different Val.Class.
In my current project we have set up on Val.Modifier ( ie for Valuation Area / Plant )..
Each plant has different Clearing Account ..
Thanking You ,
Sudhakar

Similar Messages

Multiple GLs for CVD clearing account

Hi,
Is there any means by which we can have separate CVD clearing account for Raw material and Separate CVD clearing account for Capital goods?
As far as I know, we can maintain only one GL in company code setting for CVD clearing.
Can anyone suggest ways to maintain multiple GLs?
Thanks in advance,
Vijaya

.

GL account error Valuation Clearing Account for multiple valuations

Hi
I am trying to configure multiple valuations. There is one path:
IMG --> Controlling --> General Controlling --> Multiple Valuation Approaches/Transfer Prices --> Level of Detail --> Define Valuation Clearing Account
I created in chart of account 1000 (assigned to company code 1000) GL account 490000 with PL account tick in FS00 and i created cost element as 01. Further i entered trading partner 100001 which is assigned to company code as a 'company' and in the GL account in trading partner. Now when i entered the GL account in above path, it gave following error:
Account 490000 is not a profit/loss account
Message no. KM125
Please let me know why its giving the error.

Hi,
I have maintained indicators for PRITEMX then I got error maintain services or limits.
here I am passing values for SERVICELIMIT table like DOC_ITEM, OVERALL_LIMIT & EXP_VALUE.
here I have doubt , have to maintain indicators for PRACCOUNTX & SERVICELIMITX ?
please suggest me.
Regards,
BBC

Changing GR/IR clearing account in Service Entry Sheet process

Hi,
We are using one Gr/ir clearing account for both Material and Service Entry sheet process.
Now for clear process we want to create new account for the Service entry sheet.
We have given blank valuation class for Service entry sheet and it has been assigned to the g/l account.
After analysing the scenario we had two options.1. Whether we can change the valuation class
or 2. we can create new G/l account.
But i had a doubt will it impact anywhere if i change the valuation class.
Can anybody advice me??
Thanks n regards,
Veena

Dear Javeed and Sadhashivan,
Thanks for your answers. Yes we have sort key set on both the accounts and also we have tried to display all the PO relevent fields but unable get through.
Please note we need PO no line wise on the ledger of adjustment accounts NOT on the GR/IR account.
1) Goods Delivered but not yet invoiced
2) Goods Invoiced but not yet Delivered
Hope I have made my point clear.
Thanks
Ayaz

Save automatic vendor payment run reference in clearing account assignment

Hi,
When executing an automatic vendor payment run, the run is identified with two fields:
- Run date
- Identification
When the payments are posted, the vendors are cleared and an offsetting entry is posted onto the respective clearing account for each vendor. So if there is 100 vendors in the payment run, there will be 100 line items on the clearing account.
When multiple payment runs are made on the same day, it is hard to separate the line items for each payment run, during the banking process. Each payment run appears with it's total payment amount on the bank statement and should be cleared against the corresponding line items on the clearing account and that's where it becomes hard to easily select the line items that add up to the payment amount.
Unless of course, the assignment field on the clearing account would hold the run date and identification of the payment run.
Has anybody encountered the same business scenario and found a solution for it?

Question closed due to lack of replies.

Changing GR/IR clearing account

Hi,
We are using one Gr/ir clearing account for both Material and Service Entry sheet process.
Now for clear process we want to create new account for the Service entry sheet.
We have given blank valuation class for Service entry sheet and it has been assigned to the g/l account.
After analysing the scenario we had two options.1. Whether we can change the valuation class
or 2. we can create new G/l account.
But i had a doubt will it impact anywhere if i change the valuation class.
Can anybody advice me??
Thanks n regards,
Veena

not answered

Cost Center in populating in GR/IR Clearing Account at MIRO Posting

Hi,
I am working in 4.7 EE version. We created one Service Order(purchase order) and gave account assignment as Cost Center and Business area. Then we created service entry sheet wrt to service order and accepted the service enry sheet. System automatically created MIGO document in back end. At the time of posting Invoice Verification wrt service entryshee/service order (purchaseorder), system is populating cost center in GR/IR clearing account.
Give me some idea how the cost center is populating in Balance Sheet GL A/c (GR/IR Clearing A/c).
Regards
Sudhakar

hi
i think d havnt tried the tcode i had given
it is to attach the cost element account to the costcenter
it is understandable for a sap consultant that we can`t assign gl account to the cost center
i think u have not tried the solution so plz dont make any comment on any ones experiance
ur required help and i tried to help u
this is not the way to talk with anyone
use ur own logic before asking questions and also replying for answers
sorry for helping u
kunal

GR/IR Clearing Account for Material & Asset

Hi,
We want to maintain different GR/IR Clearing Account for Materials & Assets.
Pls. guide.
Regards,

Hi
In case of asset - we define account determination in asset master which is like stock account for material. But if you use purchase order then for asset you use account assignment category as A - it means it is like account assigned purchase order. So all goods reciept credit on these POs will go to GR/IR account created without valuation class. Same time if you donot maintain service masters then goods receipt will go to same account (no valuation class). So either you need to define service materials or use same account for both.
Thanks

Difference in GR/IR freight clearing account

Hello Experts,
I am facing a problem, wherein i am doing multiple Goods receipt on a different dates for a scheduling agreement. Freight rate maintained in Scheduling agreement is Rs 2.50 per 1 kg, so when doing goods receipt ie DCGR, freight clearing account ie GR/IR freight account gets posted with different values, for eg 1st DCGR doc gets posted at Rs 2.50 per kg, while sometime other DCGR document gets posted at Rs 0.50 per kg.
I wanted to know why there is difference in rates in GR/IR freight clearing account in every DCGR document, secondly what freight rate is taken in posting & how its gets updated?
Pls provide solution ASAP.
Thanks in Advance

Dear
Below links will help you to solve the issue.
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=226575
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/91sapr3acct93-freight-grir-clearing-account-407688
GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification
Regards
Aamir

Add Multiple records to G/L account group.

Dear ABAP Experts,
i have requirement that is using BDC recording file the Functional People wants to add records to the G/L Account group. The FI consultant gave the recording file, based on the recording file i developed a BDC program. This BDC program will work for single record. After creating single record system will ask for transport request .
REPORT ZDP_ACC_GRP.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TY_TAB,
        KTOPL TYPE KTOPL,
        KTOKS TYPE KTOKS,
        TXT30 TYPE TXT30,
        VONNR TYPE VONNR,
        BISNR TYPE BISNR,
       TRKORR TYPE TRKORR,
   END OF TY_TAB.
data: lt_tab type table of ty_tab,
       wa_tab type ty_tab.
data: begin of record,
* data element: KTOPL
         KTOPL_01_001(004),
* data element: KTOKS
         KTOKS_01_002(004),
* data element: TXT30_077T
         TXT30_01_003(030),
* data element: VONNR_077S
         VONNR_01_004(010),
* data element: BISNR_077S
         BISNR_01_005(010),
* data element: TRKORR
         TRKORR_006(020),
       end of record.
*       Batchinputdata of single transaction
DATA:   BDCDATA type table of BDCDATA WITH HEADER LINE.
*       messages of call transaction
DATA:   MESSTAB type table of BDCMSGCOLL WITH HEADER LINE.
*       error session opened (' ' or 'X')
DATA:   E_GROUP_OPENED.
*       message texts
TABLES: T100.
data:lv_file type string.
parameters: p_fname type IBIPPARMS-PATH.
at selection-screen on value-request for p_fname.
CALL FUNCTION 'F4_FILENAME'
EXPORTING
    PROGRAM_NAME        = SYST-CPROG
    DYNPRO_NUMBER       = SYST-DYNNR
    FIELD_NAME          = 'P_FNAME'
IMPORTING
    FILE_NAME           = p_fname .
start-of-selection.
lv_file = p_fname.
CALL FUNCTION 'GUI_UPLOAD'
   EXPORTING
     FILENAME                      = LV_FILE
*   FILETYPE                      = 'ASC'
    HAS_FIELD_SEPARATOR           = 'X'
   TABLES
     DATA_TAB                      = LT_TAB
EXCEPTIONS
    FILE_OPEN_ERROR               = 1
    FILE_READ_ERROR               = 2
    NO_BATCH                      = 3
    GUI_REFUSE_FILETRANSFER       = 4
    INVALID_TYPE                  = 5
    NO_AUTHORITY                  = 6
    UNKNOWN_ERROR                 = 7
    BAD_DATA_FORMAT               = 8
    HEADER_NOT_ALLOWED            = 9
    SEPARATOR_NOT_ALLOWED         = 10
    HEADER_TOO_LONG               = 11
    UNKNOWN_DP_ERROR              = 12
    ACCESS_DENIED                 = 13
    DP_OUT_OF_MEMORY              = 14
    DISK_FULL                     = 15
    DP_TIMEOUT                    = 16
    OTHERS                        = 17 .
LOop at lt_tab into wa_tab.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPL0F09' '0020'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                               'V_T077S-TXT30(01)'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                               '=NEWL'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPL0F09' '0020'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                               'V_T077S-BISNR(01)'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                               '=SAVE'.
perform bdc_field       using 'V_T077S-KTOPL(01)'
                               WA_TAB-KTOPL."record-KTOPL_01_001.
perform bdc_field       using 'V_T077S-KTOKS(01)'
                               WA_TAB-KTOKS."record-KTOKS_01_002.
perform bdc_field       using 'V_T077S-TXT30(01)'
                               WA_TAB-TXT30."record-TXT30_01_003.
perform bdc_field       using 'V_T077S-VONNR(01)'
                               WA_TAB-VONNR."record-VONNR_01_004.
perform bdc_field       using 'V_T077S-BISNR(01)'
                               WA_TAB-BISNR."record-BISNR_01_005.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLSTRD' '0300'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                               'KO008-TRKORR'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                               '=LOCK'.
perform bdc_field       using 'KO008-TRKORR'
                               WA_TAB-TRKORR."record-TRKORR_006.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPL0F09' '0020'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                               'V_T077S-KTOPL(02)'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                               '=BACK'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPL0F09' '0020'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                               'V_T077S-KTOPL(02)'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                               '=BACK'.
perform bdc_transaction using 'OBD4'.
ENDLOOP.
FORM BDC_TRANSACTION USING TCODE.
   DATA: L_MSTRING(480).
   DATA: L_SUBRC LIKE SY-SUBRC.
* batch input session
* call transaction using
     REFRESH MESSTAB.
     CALL TRANSACTION 'OBD4' USING BDCDATA
                      MODE 'A'" CTUMODE
                      UPDATE 'S'"CUPDATE
                      MESSAGES INTO MESSTAB.
     L_SUBRC = SY-SUBRC.
       LOOP AT MESSTAB.
         SELECT SINGLE * FROM T100 WHERE SPRSL = MESSTAB-MSGSPRA
                                   AND   ARBGB = MESSTAB-MSGID
                                   AND   MSGNR = MESSTAB-MSGNR.
         IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
           L_MSTRING = T100-TEXT.
           IF L_MSTRING CS '&1'.
             REPLACE '&1' WITH MESSTAB-MSGV1 INTO L_MSTRING.
             REPLACE '&2' WITH MESSTAB-MSGV2 INTO L_MSTRING.
             REPLACE '&3' WITH MESSTAB-MSGV3 INTO L_MSTRING.
             REPLACE '&4' WITH MESSTAB-MSGV4 INTO L_MSTRING.
           ELSE.
             REPLACE '&' WITH MESSTAB-MSGV1 INTO L_MSTRING.
             REPLACE '&' WITH MESSTAB-MSGV2 INTO L_MSTRING.
             REPLACE '&' WITH MESSTAB-MSGV3 INTO L_MSTRING.
             REPLACE '&' WITH MESSTAB-MSGV4 INTO L_MSTRING.
           ENDIF.
           CONDENSE L_MSTRING.
           WRITE: / MESSTAB-MSGTYP, L_MSTRING(250).
         ELSE.
           WRITE: / MESSTAB.
         ENDIF.
       ENDLOOP.
   REFRESH BDCDATA.
ENDFORM.
FORM BDC_DYNPRO USING PROGRAM DYNPRO.
   CLEAR BDCDATA.
   BDCDATA-PROGRAM = PROGRAM.
   BDCDATA-DYNPRO   = DYNPRO.
   BDCDATA-DYNBEGIN = 'X'.
   APPEND BDCDATA.
ENDFORM.
FORM BDC_FIELD USING FNAM FVAL.
     CLEAR BDCDATA.
     BDCDATA-FNAM = FNAM.
     BDCDATA-FVAL = FVAL.
     APPEND BDCDATA.
ENDFORM.
But the FI consultant wants to add multiple records to 'G/L account group'.After adding records before saving the system need to ask transport request at the last.
How can I write code ...??
Please help me.

Hi Srikanth,
Thanks for reply,
You are right we need to load hierarchy for G/L then we can see all the G/L's for all G/L groups.
I have one more question when I check in RSA3 for the G/L account numbers, I could not find them.
I am using the datasource fi_gl_4 and in rsa3 I can see 1000 records data and when I put filter on G/L account and search for the G/L number I needed I cant see it, but it is there in the functional transaction(f.01)?
How to check for the required G/L's in rsa3 ?
Thx

BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for Multiple service line items

Hi Exports,
I am using BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create service PO. I am facing problem when each line item(ebelp) has multiple service line items. I am unable to map multiple service line items to a single line item (ebelp) properly.
Can anyone help.
Regards,
Kiran

Hi ,
I am able to create service PO when only one service line item is there.
If multiple service line items are there. then i have to put the below code with in the loop.
here i am facing the probelm.
        w_poservices-pckg_no    = g_pckg.
        w_poservices-line_no    = g_pckg.
        w_poservices-outl_ind   = c_x.
        w_poservices-subpckg_no = g_pckg + 1.
        w_poservices-service    = w_sdata-srvpos.
     w_poservices-short_text = w_idata-ktext1.
     w_poservices-quantity   = w_idata-menge.
     w_poservices-base_uom   = w_idata-meins.
     w_poservices-gr_price   = w_idata-tbtwr.
     w_poservices-matl_group = w_idata-matkl.
        APPEND w_poservices TO i_poservices.
        CLEAR: w_poservices.
        w_poservices-pckg_no    = g_pckg + 1.
        w_poservices-line_no    = g_pckg + 1.
        w_poservices-ext_line   = 0000000010.
        w_poservices-outl_ind   = c_x.
     w_poservices-subpckg_no = g_pckg + 2.
        w_poservices-service    = w_sdata-srvpos.
        w_poservices-short_text = w_sdata-ktext1.
        w_poservices-quantity   = w_sdata-menge.
        w_poservices-base_uom   = w_sdata-meins.
        w_poservices-gr_price   = w_sdata-tbtwr.
        w_poservices-matl_group = w_idata-matkl.
        APPEND w_poservices TO i_poservices.
        CLEAR: w_poservices.
        w_posrvaccessvalues-pckg_no    = g_pckg + 1.
        w_posrvaccessvalues-line_no    = g_pckg + 1.
        w_posrvaccessvalues-serno_line = 01.
        w_posrvaccessvalues-serial_no = 01.
        w_posrvaccessvalues-quantity   = w_idata-menge.
        APPEND w_posrvaccessvalues TO i_posrvaccessvalues.
thank you.
Regards,
Kiran

Problem when change bank clearing account for payment posting.

We recently changed the bank clearing account for payment posting (program PC00_M99_PPM). But I found out because the config can only be changed but not delimited on payroll side, the program errored out when it retro back for an employee to the old clearing account. So what am I supposed to do to fix this problem?
Have anyone ever handled this problem before and could please throw some light on it?
Thanks in advance.
Johnson

hi
check following
1. Check in OMWD, whether Valuation grouping code "0001" ia ssigned to Ur plant
2. OBYC - If you have assigned GR/IR Clearing A/c to WRX then check whether you have maintained it with combination of valuation class and GL A/c
If yes then maintain only GL A/c w/o valuation class OR maintain one entry with valuation class empty and GL A/c
check following
Error in service entry sheet
Re: Error in ML81N
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/grir-clearing-account-wrx-doesnt-recover-gl-account-2224137?cv=expanded
http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-ps/problem-while-posting-service-entrysheet-in-ecc-60-version-1483547?cv=expanded#
regards
kunal

Msg SE181 on ML81N/ME21N- PR WITH MULTIPLE SERVICES ITEMS-1 ACC. ASSIGNMENT

Hi,
when trying to create a new order using transaction ME21N or creating an entry sheet on an existing order based on a purchase requisition with multiple items in the tab services , the system gives the error message SE181 .
Debugging , i've discovered that the part of code in wich the system gets stuck , is the following :
PROGRAM DIMP_GENERAL_SAPLMLSP - INCLUDE LMLSPF3W
Check if accounting data is in sync with service data "846124
           IF ACC_TOTAL NE COMSRV-NETPR and glob_empty_package NE 'X'.
              IF SY-TCODE = 'ML81'.
                MESSAGE I181.
                EXIT.
              ELSE.
                IF GLOB_SUBSCREEN_INIT EQ SPACE.
                  ACT_PACKNO = ESLL-PACKNO.
                  MESSAGE E181.
                ELSE.
                  perform add_message using comsrv-packno
                                      'E' 'SE' '181' '' '' '
Someways , it risults that the total of the items value inserted in the tab services , is different from the total NETPR in eban .
But that is not true . ACC_TOTAL is the variable in which the values of the multiline services is put ; I thought that maybe finding out how it is populated could help me to fix the issue , but I did'nt manage to do that .
Can somebody help me , please?
Thanks and Regards,

Hi,
I have found a note for this error:
1102653 SE181 with correct account assignment data
1159878    ML81N: SE181 is displayed when you delete a entry s
I have also seen many customers with same error that also applied some of the following notes:
1113594    BAPI_PO_CHANGE - No rounding in multiple acc -> SE1
846124     ME21N: Account assignment prompt missing for subite
800471     ML81: Commitments and reference problems
784911     ML81N Problems with account assignment
749021     Service selection with incorrect documents
716030     ML81N: SE001 when copying a new entry sheet
709163     ML81N - Multiple Account Assignments - Postings inc
Best regards,
Arminda Jack

Percentage wise Confirmation for Multiple Service line items

Hi,
Percentage wise Confirmation for Multiple Service line items
During doing service entry sheet am able to do % wise confirmaion from
Menu -> Entry Sheet -> Create -> With Planned Service -> Enter Percent.
But this works only for single line item the first line.
If we have multiple line items & if i give 10%, It calculates 10% for
all items.
We want Line wise % confirmation can be given as % confirmation will differ from
line to line.
Thanks
Shashank

Dear ,
This percentage is a header data i.e applicable for all service items
F1 help clearly says
Percentage quantity to be adopted
Use
    If you wish to adopt the planned services from the purchase order, you
    can enter an additional percentage in this field in order to have that
    percentage adopted instead of the total quantity shown in the purchase
    order.
Example:
    Quantity specified.............Quantity to be adopted:.............Quantity specified "
    in purchase order:....................... 10 %..................................entry sheet:
    Service 1.......100 pc ................................................................10 pc
    Service 2.......200 m ...............................................................    20 m
    Service 3. .....30 h   .................................................................   3 h
Edited by: redriver on Jan 22, 2012 6:50 AM

Commitment Items for Multiple services in Service PO

Hi,
We have created a service master for all the services used in a project. FM is activated. Every service has 1:1 relation with commitment items.
Even after table look up & derivation, system was not picking up correct commitment item in service PO. We have used some exits & BADI's, Now system checks picks the correct commitment item stored in FMDERIVE against the service master.
The issue is, the moment I have multiple service masters in a single service PO with two separate comm. Item. System picks up the commitment item of only for line item 0010 & posts both the entries against one comm. item.
Let me know how system can pick up individual commt items.
Thanks & Regards,
Ajay

Hi Ajay,
I believe that there is one standard solution for what you developed. Let me explain better.
Please check your table FM01X. You can enable one these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information in note 1146677 and 923672. Please review the information of the notes and run the programs
according your needs.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are
not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the programs described in the note.
I believe that this will help you.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Multiple Service GR/IR clearing account

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for