Multiple WD Applications for same WD component

Hello All,
How can we generate multiple web dynpro applications for the same Web Dynpro Component?
I think one way out was to specify different interface view name for each application. But in one of the applications, I can see that 2 different applications have same interface view but have generated different URL's and have different parameters.
Kindly help me out with this issue.

Hi Abhishek,
The functionality of a single Web Dynpro component can be accessed by defining multiple applications, each addressing a different interface view and/or a different inbound plug of the interface view. In order to define a Web Dynpro application, you must specify:
1) The component to be invoked
2) Which interface view of the root component will be used
3) Which inbound plug will act as the entry point for the nominated interface view (this inbound plug must be of type Startup)
Regards,
Uday

Similar Messages

Multiple webdynpro applications for single webdynnpro component

I am working on a object which have multiple webdynpro applications for single webdynnpro component.How to assign a different functionality to each application bcoz when we right click on webdynnpro component and select create webdynpro applications ,it just creates a application how so we assign diff functionality to each of them .Also in the parameter tab of the webdynpro applications ,there is a diff config id mentioned for each application.what is its relavance .
Rgds,
Praveen

Hi Saravanan,
I need to modify it from the portal end, not at the application level.
I need some configuration steps which specifies how to modify the Detail Navigation in PPM. Using SPRO we can do some configuration, i wanted to know whether its possible from portal end as well.
Regards
Shivas Bhan

Use of multiple Applications for single webdynpro component in ABAP WEB DYNPRO

I am working on a object which have multiple webdynpro applications for single webdynnpro component.How to assign a different functionality to each application bcoz when we right click on webdynnpro component and select create webdynpro applications ,it just creates a application how so we assign diff functionality to each of them .Also in the parameter tab of the webdynpro applications ,there is a diff config id mentioned for each application.what is its relavance

Hi Sam,
Different functionalities for a single webdynpro component can be achieved by many ways. Among them is the use of multiple applications. Say for example if you want different views/windows to be displayed at the start up, you can achieve it by specifying at the default window, for each every webdynpro application.
And if you want control the fields, say for example you want to display input fields as editable for one application and read only for other application, you can achieve it through application parameters. Based on parameters, in HANDLEDEFAULT method of window controller , you can specify the type of behaviour , whether it has to editable or not based on parameters and same can be used at context binding of UI properties.
Application configuration can be used for personalization.Web Dynpro ABAP Application Configuration. This tutorial would help you understanding the concept much better. There can be multiple application configurations for a single application.
Regards,
Harsha

Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor

All SAP Gurus,
Is it possible to have Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor code (where purchasing org and company code is same)?
Regards,

hi,
You can't have more than one because the reconcilation account...Because this is the soul account by which you pay to vendor and send the details to further process to FI dept...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Multiple tax lines for same item

Hi,
Is it possible to have multiple tax lines for same item in an invoice in AR.
Business Need - A few items have multiple tax applicable ( e.g. VAT, Service tax, etc ). And for regulatory purpose customer wants to show each tax separately.
please Advise.
thanks,
K

Hi Hikumar,
With tax groups you have what is called compound taxes.
A tax group is consisted of more than one tax codes and these tax codes may be related or not to each other,you can also specify the precedence of the tax codes in a tax group.
On the Invoice or order item line, the tax group code is entered and the tax engine calculates the tax for each tax code that belongs to the tax group.
If the user wants to see the taxes of this line he will see detailed the tax amounts and rates of each tax code that belong to this group.
In my case i have used a tax group with 3 tax codes with the structure:
Item line amount 1000
1)The first line is a specific sales tax(12%) with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*12%=120
2)The second line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount calculated from the first tax of the group=120*23%=27,6
3) The third line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*23%=230
For each item line that has the above tax group, the system creates three seperate tax lines
Your case does not seem so complicate as mine.
You can find more information on the AR user guide and the Oracle receivables tax manual.
On which Ebs version are you working on?
If you sent me more detailed you requirement i can quide you on the way to implement it and test it.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Olga

Invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer

Hi Team,
I just wanted to know if we can create manual invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer?
For project based invoice request i have create based on single invoice request.
Appreciate your input here.
Thanks,
Nitin

Dear Ratish,
Thanks for yr reply.
I already did that but it is not serving business purpose.
Comm payment - comes diff time than sales payment.
so ,I will post one entry customer will get hit with total amount Sales + commission
like below
Let say 10, 000 is the sales value and 500 is the commission
So , This entry will get posted
Customer Db- 10,500
Sales Cr- 10,000
Comm Income Cr- 500
But, As I said sales amt will be paid before so We need to clear it partially and some time customer pays also diff amount due to some defect.
So, We wont be knowing for which case we have or havnet received the payment against commission.
As , Customer account is got hit with total amount( Sales+ Comm..value).
Pls advise how to solve this.
Regards,
Sukh

F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.

Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please?

2LIS_02_HDR - Multiple records coming for same EBELN, why?

Hello All,
I ran a setup table for init and tested extraction in rsa3 for data source 2LIS_02_HDR , only one EBELN and it retrievs 3 records for same EBELN. As per my understanding the header data comes from EKKO hence it should bring only one record but retireves multiple records,I want to know why this happens?
thanks
V Pola
Edited by: V pola on Jan 30, 2008 5:35 PM

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. The link does not explain why 2LIS_02_HDr retrieves multiple records instead of one.
Thanks
V Pola

Multiple GR values for same quantity

Hello all SAP MM Gurus,
I have a strange problem. I have a MM scheduling agreement 5500013812 and in this agreement there is one line item for material 651660. The GR has been done for this line item a number of times since 2009. But when I went to purchase order history of this line item, I found that for a quantity of 500 PCs, the system has posted different amounts.
For example, when the GR was done on 02/21/2011 for qty 500, the amount was 706.68 EUR. When the GR was done on 01/31/2011 for qty 500, the amount was 776.94 and when the GR was done on 12/13/2010 for qty 500, the amount posted was 765.57 EUR. This is really puzzling me since there are no price changes in Material master record or in MM scheduling agreement. There are no alloy surcharge price changes also. But still, why the system is posting different amounts for same quantity of this material, I don't understand.
Can someone please tell me whether I am missing something somewhere? Your suggestion would be very much helpful for me in resolving this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Umakanth

this? :-(
SQL> WITH t AS
2    (SELECT 'SCOTT' NAME ,'jefferson rd' address FROM dual
3     UNION ALL
4    SELECT 'KODY', 'milburn'    FROM dual
5     UNION ALL
6    SELECT 'ZACH', 'westlake rd'     FROM dual
7     UNION ALL
8    SELECT 'KAREN', 'camarillo'    FROM dual
9     UNION ALL
10    SELECT 'MILLER', 'jefferson rd'     FROM dual
11     UNION ALL
12    SELECT   'THOMAS', 'milburn'   FROM dual
13     )
14 SELECT *
15 FROM t
16 WHERE address IN (SELECT address
17                    FROM t
18                   GROUP BY address
19                    HAVING COUNT(*)>1);
NAME   ADDRESS
SCOTT jefferson rd
MILLER jefferson rd
KODY   milburn
THOMAS milburn

BPEL - multiple receive elements for same partner/operation

Is it possible to have more Receive elements for same operation in one BP? I need to create a business process for approving requests in a number of steps. The process looks like this:
RECEIVE (createRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (createRequest)
RECEIVE (approveRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (approveRequest)
RECEIVE (approveRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (approveRequest)
(...)The creation and first recieve element for "approveRequest" is ok, but the others are never executed. I believe the correlation sets are set correctly. I also can't use a While element since every step could be a bit different. If I substitute the other recieves for different operations, the whole process executes correctly.
Can someone please advice me on what i am doing wrong? If it's somehow not possible to have more then one Recieve for a particular message in one BP, what is the best way to do it differently?

Thank you for your answer. I tried to change the Receive elements to Pick + OnMessage, but it's not working either. It goes past the first one but it never reaches the second one. That's what i had in the first place - two Pick elements after each other, each with an 'approve' and 'dispprove' branch, but it didn't work so I simplified it to an easier process with just receive elements.
If it's working for you, do you do something special in the process? Which version of OpenESB are you using? Would it be possible for you to send the BPEL file? Here is a part of mine I've just made to test this solution.
<bpws:pick name="Pick1">
    <bpws:onMessage partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemIn5">
        <bpws:correlations>
            <bpws:correlation set="orderItemId" initiate="no"/>
        </bpws:correlations>
        <bpws:sequence name="Sequence2">
            <bpws:assign name="Assign7">
                <bpws:copy>
                    <bpws:from>true()</bpws:from>
                    <bpws:to part="return" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut4"/>
                </bpws:copy>
            </bpws:assign>
            <bpws:reply name="Reply3" partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut4"/>
        </bpws:sequence>
    </bpws:onMessage>
</bpws:pick>
<bpws:pick name="Pick2">
    <bpws:onMessage partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemIn6">
        <bpws:correlations>
            <bpws:correlation set="orderItemId" initiate="no"/>
        </bpws:correlations>
        <bpws:sequence name="Sequence1">
            <bpws:assign name="Assign6">
                <bpws:copy>
                    <bpws:from>true()</bpws:from>
                    <bpws:to part="return" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut3"/>
                </bpws:copy>
            </bpws:assign>
            <bpws:reply name="Reply2" partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut3"/>
        </bpws:sequence>
    </bpws:onMessage>
</bpws:pick>

Single log in for multiple apex application in same workspace

hi forum.
We created 5 applications based on same schema and all in one workspace now. Actually, initially they were created on different machines. now, we have to authenticate users from AD and depending on user type, have to allow or deny some modules. i have created one pager application which have 5 buttons and can control rendering of buttons according to user logged in but...the problem is, inside the applications, i have restrictions on some reports for some users...now one way was to do that is to create a log in for every application separately and thus every application would exactly know who is logged in. but that would be impractical as we need single-sign-on kind of functionality.
please let me know how to have a single log in page work for all application inside the apex workspace so that every application would know name of the user currently logged in.
for the 5 applications, i actually use No_Authentication authentication scheme. and i use following function initially for my one pager application to render the buttons to user or deny
create or replace function getUserName return varchar2
is
   userName varchar2(20);
   c owa_cookie.cookie;
begin
    c := owa_cookie.get('LOGIN_USERNAME_COOKIE');
    userName := c.vals(1);
    return trim(userName);
end;but i cannot user this function obviously in my 5 actual applications.
help is requested please.
bundle of thanks in advance.

You can create one application that does the login authentication according to your authentication scheme. When authenticated, this login app sets a cookie. That's all the login app does (and maybe show a list of available apps to choose from).
The other apps have an even simpler authentication scheme. The only thing they have to do is check the cookie and redirect to the login page (Session Not Valid URL) if there is no valid cookie.

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

Include multiple SAP applications for implementation in CE ESR

Hi guys,
I would like to know whether it is possible to implement different services in the ESR of a CE environment in different SAP applications.
For example operation 1 of outbound interface of process component 1 is implemented in the SRM system. The operation 2 of outbound interface of process component 2 is implemented in the CRM system.
Guss it flys, but just want to be sure.
If this works then use of PI is only necessary for A2A processes with mediation and B2B processes (adapter engine necessary), correct?
Thanks a lot,
Mane

Hi,
Yes, It'spossible.
Eventhough we design the process components we implemnt the service interface.
You can generate proxy for the service interface in multiple systems and implement only the required operations.
Thanks,
Abdul Raheem S

Multiple symbolic links for same wdfdevice object

Is it possible for my driver to call WdfDeviceCreateSymbolicLink twice successfully to create 2 symbolic links to the same device ?
I have one device driver, which controls one physical device, which performs two separate functions and i would like the applications to use different symbolic links to refer to the different functions.
Calling WdfDeviceCreateSymbolicLink twice fails so what other options do i have to solve this ?

you can have WDF manage as many device interface guids as you want. If you want to understand which interface is being opened, you need to specify a unique ReferenceString for each.
WDF does limit you to one WDF managed symbolic link. If you want more than one, you can create it by calling IoCreateSymbolicLink yourself. you will then have to delete on your own too. If you have control over which path, use multiple device interfaces
further reading
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/doronh/archive/2006/08/18/706717.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/doronh/archive/2006/02/24/538790.aspx
d -- This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

WDA Personalization bug when running multiple instances of the same WDA component

I have found an issue relative to WDA personalization that it seems to be a bug for me.
Scenario:
In my scenario, I have a Web Dynpro component A which has two usages of the same Web Dynpro Component B (USAGE1 and USAGE2).There is a WDA application APPL_A defined to fire WDA component A. I have defined a component configuration COMP_CONF1 for WDA component B and an application configuration APP_CONF1 for WDA application APPL_A. This application configuration applies the same component configuration COMP_CONF1 to both usages USAGE1 and USAGE2.
Runtime behaviour:
At runtime, I execute application APPL_A using the application configuration APP_CONF1. When I personalize something in the USAGE1 of WDA component B, the effects does not appear in USAGE2 until a page refresh is done. Obviously, as both usages uses the same component configuration at rutime the effects of personalization should be applied to both, but WDA configuration framework fails to apply the changes instantaneously to USAGE2.
Have you expermiented this behaviour? Is there any workaround for this?

I have found an issue relative to WDA personalization that it seems to be a bug for me.
Scenario:
In my scenario, I have a Web Dynpro component A which has two usages of the same Web Dynpro Component B (USAGE1 and USAGE2).There is a WDA application APPL_A defined to fire WDA component A. I have defined a component configuration COMP_CONF1 for WDA component B and an application configuration APP_CONF1 for WDA application APPL_A. This application configuration applies the same component configuration COMP_CONF1 to both usages USAGE1 and USAGE2.
Runtime behaviour:
At runtime, I execute application APPL_A using the application configuration APP_CONF1. When I personalize something in the USAGE1 of WDA component B, the effects does not appear in USAGE2 until a page refresh is done. Obviously, as both usages uses the same component configuration at rutime the effects of personalization should be applied to both, but WDA configuration framework fails to apply the changes instantaneously to USAGE2.
Have you expermiented this behaviour? Is there any workaround for this?

Multiple WD Applications for same WD component

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for