Notification Required if goods issue aganist the cost centre

Issue/Concern:-
          To reserve stock for a cost center & don't allow issue to another cost centre or notification should be sent to the user.
Description:-
Stock is reserved by creating reservation by MB21 for one cost centre e.g.1151-Production. We want to restrict this stock for the same Costcentre only.But when tried to issue stock to another cost center 11512-Maintanance,
              System should allow for goods issue of this stock to another cost center other than Prouction but notification sent to the Prouction CostCentre user who has done the reservation while issuing.
Kindly let me know if you require more clarifications on this.

Yes Exactly,
                  UserA     -
Reservation 0001--Req Date 03-04-2010Material M-Cost Centre Production
Now the     User B    -
Reservation 0002--Req Date 01-04-2010Material M-Cost Centre Maintanence
Then User A has to get an email alert notification while Material M issuing to the User B.

Similar Messages

  • Validation for Cost center for Goods issue against the cost centers

    Dear Friends
    In my client place we have 6 plants are defined and profit centers are defined for each plant. Hence here each plant is one profit center. Cost centers are defined plant wise.
    The requirement is when the goods issued to cost center system should check the cost center is defined against the plant. ( i.e., Cost center def against the Profit Center, and Profit center equal to Plant).
    Is there any provision to assign the plant to profit center or vice versa?
    Please guide me how to resolve the issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    Please check EC01. May be it can help you. But in my view it is not possible.

  • Question about the requirement for goods issue from a delivery (VOFM)

    Dear all
    ※Please note that this is related to the credit limit check.
    I am trying to set up the SAP system, so that if the maintenance contract (rental document) is billed at least once,
    the system would allow the user to bill the customer regardless of the credit usage (ex. 150%).
    So I created the following routine for the credit check (in VOFM).
    IF XVBAK-AUART = 'ZMZZ'.    --> Please note that ZMZZ is the document type of our rental document
       LOOP AT XFPLT.
           IF XVBUK-FKSAK = 'B' or XVBUK-FKSAK = 'C'.
    We will not do any credit limit check for this item line.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-SECURITY.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-STATIC_LIMIT.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DOCUMENTVALUE.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-REVIEWDATE.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OPEN_ITEMS.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OLDEST_OP.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DUNNING_LEVEL.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER1.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER2.
                MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER3.
                EXIT.
          ENDIF. 
               EXIT.
       ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
    Now, with the routine above, it became possible to bill customers regardless of the credit usage.
    However, when we try to ship (posting goods issue) the item for that maintenance contract, when the credit usage exceeds 100%, the system rejects it with the error message below.
    <Error message>
    Static credit check: credit limit exceeded
    Now, I want to set up the system, so that if the posting goods is for the item which satisfies the following condition,
    the system would not reject the posting due to the error above.
    <condition>
    1. The item is for the maintenance contract which was billed at least once --> this means that this is not a new contract
    ※Please note that for new maintenance contracts (which is not billed even once),  the system should not allow to post goods 
       issue if the credit usage exceeds 100 %.
    I looked into VOFM, and found out that we are using the following routines for posting goods issue.
    <system routine>
    13
    <user routine>
    113
    But I didn't know where the error (Static credit check: credit limit exceeded) came from.
    Could you tell me how to find (or where to modify) a location where I can make the modification in order to
    satisfy our requirement?
    Thank you very much in advance

    Dear all
    I was able to solve the problem by setting up the credit check routine for delivery notes, and assign it for "No credit check" field
    in the automatic credit control (OVA8).
    So, thank you for your help, everyone
    Takashi

  • Posting multiple goods issues against the same delivery

    Hello gurus,
    We are a fashion apparel company using ECC 6.0 and would like to know if it is possible to post mutliple goods issues against the same delivery?
    I will explain the business requirement.
    - We create a stock transport order to deliver 400 units of merchandise to on or our retail stores (STO is created and processed to a delivery).
    - This information is passed down to our warehouse management system (which is not SAP)
    - Our warehouse management system has the ability to split a delivery into multiple shipment when needed.  For example, our warehouse may only be able to complete 250 units for our morning shipment and will therefore pick, pack and post this.  This will feed back into SAP and process a 641 movement so that the units now show as "in transit".  This is needed so that our stores can process the ASN and move the units into their inventory when they receive the merchandise later that day.
    - During the afternoon, our warehouse will process the remaining 150 units and will ship this to our store later in the evening or next day.
    Currently, we are not able to process another goods issue against a delivery as we close out the delivery during the first goods issue.  We would prefer not to have to generate a new delivery for our DC and let them continue to process against the same delivery, but we are unsure how to configure this.
    Any help or guideance would be extremely appreciated
    Thanks in advance

    Hi RJ,
    First of all sorry to write such a lengthy reply,In one line if i want to summerize then it is not possible with standard SAP however we can achieve this by writing some piece of code in both the system
    AS - IS
                   Business process
              From business process point of view you are right that once the pick & pack is in process it is not advisable to create a new delivery document for balance quantity and share the same with WMS as then they have to create a new document in WMS and start picking based on that rather then the old delivery document number. if i am in your position then i can give a thought like this
    e.g.
    Delivery                                                  - 100 Unit
    Shipment confirmation from WMS            -   60 Unit
    Change in delievry quanity / Pick qty        -   60 Unit
    Invoice from SAP                                    -   60 Unit
    Second confirmation from WMS                          -   40  Unit
    Change in the existing delivery quantity                -   Now here we have two option either
    1) Change the delivery quantity / Pick qty  to (60+40) =100 or
    2) Remove the 60 and update 40 as delivery and pick quantity
    Pros & Cons
    if you will select option 1 then furhter invoice will happen for 100 unit which is incorrect as physically you are shipping only 40 unit
    if you are selecting option 2 then the document flow is incorrect as you don't have history(in SAP) for the 60 unit which was shipped earlier
    Solution ::
    so in my opinion the best option is to create a seperate delivery document (store the old delviery number in one of the field of the new delivery and pass the same to custom segment of the IDoc) transmit the IDoc to WMS write the validation logic in WMS
    Find the record with old deliver number in the WMS system, check the status whether it is active or inactive
    if it is acitive Validate the Material + qty with the WMS record(Material + balance quantity) if both are same then pass the new deliery number to custom field of the WMS table
    At the time of confirming back to the SAP, Write a piece of code in SAP that if the incoming idoc custom field(new delivery number) field is populated then ignore the orignal document number and post the document using the new delivery document number
    Hope this help

  • Post goods issue at the time of complete shipment

    Hi Experts,
    Please let me know the configuration steps to do post goods issue in the complete shipment.  Appreciate your help.
    Thanks.
    with regards,
    Muthu.

    Dear Muthu,
    Please go through this IMG path then do the configuration settings.
    SPRO>Logistics Execution>Transaportation>Shipments>Define and Assign activity profiles, here you maintain variant name in the At completion colomun select your shipment document then click on Maintain push buton now system will take you to the maintain variant screen in that screen you can find the tab Post goods issue for the deliveries of shipment under this tab you put radio button for carry out goods issue posting during save, then save the variant.
    Now you create shipment document while saving the shipment document PGI will carry out for the deliveries which are avail in that shipment document.
    If you more details go through this link it will help you,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/3d/42aa07074f11d2bf5d0000e8a7386f/frameset.htm
    I hope it will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • I cannot cancel the goods issue because the delivery has been archived

    Dear Gurus,
    I have cancelled the MB1C goods receipt but I cannot cancel the goods issue because the delivery has been archived. Is it possible for you to fix this batch record any other way ?
    Early resposne would be appreciated !
    Thanks,
    Rafiq

    Dear Friends,
    Can u please help me out of this issue
    Thanks,
    Rafiq

  • Conversion assistance : Goods Issue in the past

    Hello All,
    Looking for some help for conversion of transactional data from Legacy.
    Client wants to have the "goods issues in the past" to be converted to reflect the actual transactional data . 
    Anybody done anything similar in the past?
    Appreciate the assistance!
    CJ

    in general any goods movement of valuated stock will create accounting ddocuments and hence effect finance.
    Dont spend to much time to think about migrating historical movements, it is not possible.
    if you plan such, then you would need to add all consumptions to your stock migration and reduce this by all past receipts.
    As the movements are usually not stand-alone activities, you have to consider that you cannot perform a goods receipt without having the old (and already closed) purchase order/production order migrated.
    further the goods receipt would recalculated the moving average price, so you would need to post all historic movements in sequence of their original entry. but this means you would as well need to post invoices, which will then lead to a second payment to the vendor (do you really want that)
    all this for a statistical transaction like MC46?
    If you are going to a new system, then a new time begins to start.
    I guess you will have more important  problems around go live than a MC46 list.

  • Reserve stock for a cost center & don't allow issue to another cost centre?

    Dear Experts,
    How to reserve stock for a cost center & don't allow issue to another cost centre?
    Stock is reserved by creating reservation by MB21 for one cost centre e.g.CC1.
    We want to restrict this stock for the same cost center CC1 only.
    But when tried to issue stock to another cost center CC2, system allowed to post goods issue document.
    System should not allow for goods issue of this stock to another cost center other than CC1.
    How to make it.......please suggest.

    I have checked
    SPRO MM -- Inventory Management and Physical Inventory -- Reservation -- Maintain Copy Rules for Reference Documents
    This is for reference document data copying.
    Do you mean to say SPRO MM -- Inventory Management and Physical Inventory -- Reservation -- Set Dynamic Availability Check
    Here for mvmt type 201 - valuation update - qty update - no special stock - Goods mvmt w/o reference - A (Dynamic Avl. chk) is the setting.
    But system is not issuing the any message while issuing reserved stock to another cost center.
    Please suggest...

  • Resrticting Goods receipt based on cost centre in EBP Version 2.0

    Hi,
    I am working with EBP2.0 version & I need to know whether I can restrict the GR with ref. to cost centre in EBP. (ie. Receive any order functionality. We have not defaulted any cost centre & the user will enter the cost centre & GL a/c at the time of creation of shopping cart only.
    Is it possible to restrict the Goods Receipt with ref. to cost centre in EBP2.0 version. If so then please let me know how to go about it.
    Your immediate response is very much appreciated.
    Regards
    Raghu

    Hi  S.R.P.         
        There is no control  between GI and GR, you have to make a control using UDF
    for example
    1.Add UDF in GR called GI Number
    2.and make this field mandatory using SP
    3.Ask the user to enter GI number
    4.If user enter GI number in GR then choose the item code in GR means,using FMS you can also do automatically load a Warehouse,price,Account code what ever in GI.
    5.using sql query report u will get control
    Edited by: Prasanna s on Sep 16, 2009 10:33 AM

  • Change the profit centre in the cost centre master after a year

    Hi All,
    Could you'll please let me know whether it was possible to change the profit centre in the cost centre master and if i did what will be the implications.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Vandana

    Refer transaction code OKEG.
    You can maintain master data for cost centers, cost elements, activity    
    types, and business processes with time dependencies. You can make        
    changes at any time for any given time interval. Data storage also takes  
    place with a time reference. In this way, a master data record can have   
    multiple database records storing different information.                                                                               
    The smallest interval is one day. To ensure data consistency, you cannot  
    change each field daily. The timeframes in which you can change a field   
    depend on the field functions, which are fixed by the system and cannot   
    be changed. Master data maintenance includes an automatic check for each  
    field's time-based consistency, resulting in individual time-based        
    maintenance for each field.                                                                               
    The following dependencies are supported:                                                                               
    o   Not time-based                                                                               
    o   Day-based                                                                               
    o   Period-based                                                                               
    o   (Fiscal) year-based                                                                               
    This function provides an overview of the time dependencies of           
    individual master data fields during master data maintenance, along with 
    checks and storage of consistency timeframes. You find this information  
    in the "Time dependency" column.                                                                               
    If you use fields requiring characteristics greater than one day and     
    which are changed for the system lifetime of the object, the system      
    automatically creates a new database record for this processing          
    interval, and changes the time-based validity of existing records. The   
    change is logged in the master data record with the time reference.      
    However, a great number of changes in multiple timeframes will result in 
    a correspondingly great number of data records.                                                                               
    Fields which you can change freely (indicated in the DAY column) can     
    possess different time dependencies only if you mark them additionally   
    as historically relevant. This activates the time-based updating for the 
    records.
    Object 1000 has one master data record created with a fiscal year of 12 
    periods and the cost center name AAAAAAAAAA. During master data         
    maintenance, you change the cost center name in period 5 to BBBBBBBBBB. 
    The system reacts with one of two options.                                                                               
    o   "Name" is marked as historically relevant. The existing master data 
         record for periods 1 - 12 must now become three records:            
         1000   01-04   AAAAAAAAAA                                           
         1000   05      BBBBBBBBBB                                           
         1000   06-12   AAAAAAAAAA                                                                               
    o   "Name" is not marked as historically relevant. The existing master  
         data record remains intact, with the name changed for the entire    
         existence of the record:                                            
         1000   01-12   BBBBBBBBBB
    Edited by: Ravi Sankar Venna on May 19, 2009 4:03 PM

  • How to Add the cost centre  in the KSBB report

    Hi Experts,
    How can we add cost centre in KSBB report. Is it possible to add? if yes could any one guide me how to add the cost centre in KSBB report?
    waiting for your replies,
    Regards

    Hi,
    I see only three possible explanations:
    a) no data on this cost centre
    b) authorizations
    c) 'hard-coded' filter in the relevant report (only if it's user-developed report)
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Copying the cost centre details to all line items in SC

    HI all,
    Im working on SRM 5.0.We are creating mult line item SC's.My reqt is that once i enter the cost centre details in the 1st item of the SC,that cost centre value should be copied automatically to all the line items in the cart w/o click of any button.
    My problem is that the CHNAGE badi cannot be used as the copying should be done immediately after the 1st item details are entered and w/o clicking of any button on the sceen,
    - Ram

    Hi Ram!
    Once you gave the Account assignment for your first line item, you should have the button "Change All Items in Document".
    If you manage to use it, then you only have to push it once => it will be copied automatically to all items of the SC.
    imre

  • Change the Cost Centre

    Dear Sap Guru,
    My user book  the entry with Cost center but after that he knows  that book wrong Cost Centre. Now how I can change it the cost center only in this entry.
    Regards,
    Ankita

    Hi,
    You have to either reverse the original document and post ot again with right cost centre or make internal posting in CO (KB11N)  between the cost centres. In the first case, you will have the update in FI and CO; in the second only in CO.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Link the cost centre with the activity

    Hi all,
    I want to link the cost centre with the activity. when i try it in KP26 and then try in cat2 it gives me as cost centre should be in conjunction with the activity.
    Please help me how to link the cost centre with the activity
    Regards & thanks,
    Srividhya

    hi,
    1st check G/L account which you are trying to clear or Post .Use t.code:FS00, enter G/L accounts and check "Open item" is maintained or not. If not select the check box "Open Item Management" in account management in Company code segment in Control data TAB and save.
    and cehck wether you have maintained the cost element in fs00 for your g/l account on header there is a button edit cost element

  • MIGO- Goods Issue- Order, the value is not written into Table COSP

    Hi,
      We make a substitution of wbs element of line item( BSEG-PROJK ). The wbs filed will be filled automatically when the user input a cost center or a order number.
    But we found some inconsistency in standard report S_ALR_87013558 OR CJI3.
    The following is what we have done:
    In Tcode F-02, we enter a order(e.g. A), then the WBS Element is filled automatically. when we post the document, and go to Standard report: S_ALR_87013558,
    we can see the amount in the report.
    In MIGO, we make a goods issue by order(e.g. A. Movement type is 261) , when we post, Material Document and Accounting document and Controlling document , but in report S_ALR_87013558 or CJI3. the amount is wrong, we can not see the amount we have done in MIGO.
    The movement type 201 is also wrong, the value is also not written into tabl cosp.
    But GI for project-movement type 221, the value is written into table cosp.
    Can you tell me this is wrong or right? if right, why? if wrong, how can i correct it, i need some customizing or others? or my substitution affect the result?
    Best Regards
    qingda

    Sorry, not reply these days.
    And very thanks for all your replies.
    I am a abaper, not familiar with the business.
    The business consultant want to control budget, control cost. 
    At first, he let me do a substibution in FI line item of besg-projk(WBS Element), when we he test the substitution in TCode F-02, the WBS field is filled automatically as per G/L account and Cost Center or as per G/L Account and Order, and then in Standard Report 'S_ALR_87013558', we can see the changes of the cost.
    But when biz consultant do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can not see the changes of the cost,but the value of WBS in FI Accounting Document is substituted correctly.
    And if we enter the WBS manually when we do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can see the changes of the report 'S_ALR_87013558'.
    In the original post, i was wrong, when we do a goods issue with movement type 201, the result is the same as 261, also we cant see the changes. but if we enter the wbs manually(movement type 201),the changes is write to COSP table.
    The solution about the original requirement is right or wrong?
    Thank You All.
    Best Regards
    qingda

Maybe you are looking for

  • DVD Drive Module on Pismo sticks out of expansion bay. Any way to fix?

    I just picked up a Pismo the other day and found a DVD drive for it on ebay, which works perfectly, but the drive sticks out of the expansion bay a little unless I put some pressure on the bottom or the top of the computer. Of course, when I release

  • Hyperlinks in pdf documents created from Keynote

    For some reason the hyperlinks I've recently added to a keynote document are not active when I convert it to a pdf document. Neither Preview nor Adobe recognise them as hyperlinks. I've made the hyperlinks active using the inspector, and give the ful

  • Full text search on PLM Web UI

    Hello,   Full text search functionality in DMS with TREX solution , is working with SAP GUI. ( Original is checked in CV01N or CV02N )   Same functionality is not working with PLM Web UI . Is there any setting has to be activated for this. Thanking y

  • Putting G5 to sleep...

    I have heard from a few different people that letting my computer go to sleep is not good for it. Was someone just screwin' with me?

  • FQDN Query when publishing the Lync 2010 Topology

    Hello All While am Defining  the Topology for Lync 2010 Enterprise Edition , in which the define of  SQL store , i forgot to mention the FQDN of SQL server name, instead i was mentioned only server name. my sql server FDQN is SQL.doitnow.com Define a