OB74 clearing rules

Hi all,
I want to clear one gl account automatically using OB74 rules. But I have an exception that this transaction doesnt cover.
I explain in detail:
We are receving bank statements in USD and EUR. So, invoices have to clear automatically in both currencies. With the rule defined below I can just clear automatically invoices posted in EUR (Local currency) or foreign currencies. But for USD I dont want to clear by local currency but Document currency.
Rule defined:
gl account 11000  using criterion DMBTR
And I cant change the rule into criterion AMOUNT, because invoices in foreign currencies doesnt match with bank statemetn in EUR....
How can I manage to get both rules in the system?
Many thanks
Regards
M

Dear Mansika,
You want to clear the GL Account 110000 by Amount in local currency (DMBTR) when the currency is EUR. When the currency is USD the clearing is in Amount in Document Currency (WRBTR).
SAP Standard doesn't provide conditional criteria for automatic clearing however you can use a substitution rule for this process.
Look my suggestion below and let me know if it was helpful.
Define 2 additional steps in your Substitution Rule:
Step 1
Prerequisite:
BSEG-HKONT (GL acc) = '110000' and BKPF-WAERS (Moeda Doc) = 'EUR'
Substitution:
BSEG-DMBTR (Amount Local Currency) = BSEG-ZUONR (Assignment)
Step 2
Prerequisite:
BSEG-HKONT (GL acc) = '110000' e BKPF-WAERS (Moeda Doc) = 'USD'
Substitution:
BSEG-WRBTR (Amount Local Currency) = BSEG-ZUONR (Assignment)
Transaction OB74
GL ACC: 110000 / Criteria: ZUONR (Assignment)
I suggest that you set up the field 'assignment' as a selection criterion. If you have any use for this field look for some other field that is not being used.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • GRIR - Criteria set in OB74 - Additional rule for automatic clearing

    Hi,
    WIth reference to the subject of this post, I would like to have advice on the commonly used criteria for the GRIR GL account.
    My GL master for this GRIR settings: sort key is 010: Purchase order no., which is EBELN (Tcode: OB16).
    Currently the settings at OB74 - Additional rule for automatic clearing for my GRIR are as follows:
    DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur.
    ZUONR, Assignment
    EBELN, Purchasing Document
    My issue is due to the criteria of DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur, I am not able to clear the GRIR GL using F.13, and after I remove the criteria: DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur, I manage to clear all my GR and IR entries which have 0 balance in amount in local currency.
    KIndly advise.
    P/S: DO I need to have the following settings, additionally?
    Define Tolerance Groups for G/L Accounts
    Define Tolerance Groups for Employees
    Assign Users to Tolerance Groups
    Create Accounts for Clearing Differences
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks.
    But my problem is as follows:
    My issue is due to the criteria of DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur, I am not able to clear the GRIR GL using F.13, and after I remove the criteria: DMBTR, Amt.in loc.cur, I manage to clear all my GR and IR entries which have 0 balance in amount in local currency.
    Do you have any idea?

  • Different clearing rules in SAPF124

    Hi Gurus,
    usually we use the filed ZUONR as automatic Clearing rule for GR/IR account.
    Now we have a Company code, which has a another Content in this field. We could use fields EBELN and EBELP.
    The rules I store in customizing..are they like "and-rules" or is this like an "or" - this is because we can not set the rule by company code and of course we still need the ZUONR rule... so if it is an "and" we don't have a chance here anyway...
    2.) Any suggestions how to solve it?
    Many thanks in advance!
    Sandra

    Hi Sandra
    The conditions in OB74 are "AND" conditions.
    Since, we cannot set the criteria at company code level, I would suggest that you use different G/L accounts for the purpose of different criteria.
    Since, COA has a vast number of G/L accounts, you can look for some G/L numbers which are not used in any other company code as of now and use them for your purpose only in this particular company code after configuration.
    Regards
    Sowmya

  • FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

    Hi Folks,
    We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
    Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4;  Group: 019
    Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
    I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); Clearing rule is working perfectly during payments, however for account maintenance and automatic clearing it's not applying the credits against security deposits first. I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
    Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Santosh

    Santosh:
    This rule will not work in account maintenance.  You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work.  Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments.  You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
    regards,
    bill.

  • FICA: clearing rules to applying payments against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

    Hi Folks,
    We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
    Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4;  Group: 019
    Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
    I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); However, I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
    Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Santosh
    Moderator update - question solved with FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date
    Message was edited by: William Eastman

    Santosh:
    This rule will not work in account maintenance.  You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work.  Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments.  You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
    regards,
    bill.

  • P2P fulfillment and Clearing rule interaction

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue related to Promise to Pay (P2P).
    We are using FP2P1 to create P2P.  The open items listed in FP2P1 creation screen appear to be sorted based on net due date (ascending), document number( ascending), amount (descending).  The user selects the open items from the top and downward, until the promised amount is exhausted.  When the payment is posted, the clearing sequence configured in the clearing variant is that first by the cash discount due day (ascending), division (ascending) and main transaction (ascending).  Therefore, the payment would clear the items that not included in the P2P, however, the fulfillment is calculated based on the each P2P item's clearing status. For example, the customer has promised to pay $200.  P2P includes document A, B, C for the total of 200.  The customer paid $200 before the check date.  However, the payment has cleared document A, D, E.  When the P2P is evaluated, it is not fulfilled because only document A is cleared.
    I would like to sort open items in the FP2P1 creation screen in the sequential order that is consistent with our clearing rule.  I checked event 182 to 191, but not sure if one of them is called at time of open item selection.  Do you think it is possible to add open item sorting logic in event 187? 
    Thank you very much for your help.
    Jennifer

    Hi Amlan,
    Thank you for your suggestions.
    Our clearing rule reflects the regulatory and business requirements and therefore we cannot change it. If we create P2P based on the standard SAP open item sorting logic, and then clear them first, it would violate our clearing rule. 
    I do not quite understand your suggestion - "The P2P items against the customer account can be put on direct debit".  Could you please elaborate it if you get a moment?  Thank you!
    I just received SAP's reply to my OSS message.  Below is the reply: 
    "I checked the situation in our reference system and I found out that
    the displayed fields of the open item processing in transaction fp2p1
    results from customizing (under FI-CA=>Basic Functions=>Open Item
    Management=>Define Line Layout Variants for Open Item Processing).
    Unfortunately there is no possibility to define a default sorting
    variant. Also in the open item processing itself is no option to
    define a default sorting. As the functionality does not exist I
    recommend you to fill a development request. In SAP note 11 you'll
    find more information about it."
    Jennifer

  • Need userexit / badi / bte to enhance the automatic clearing rules

    Dear All,
    My requirement is to enhance the automatic clearing rules for tcode ff_5.
    Program RFEBKA00 will upload bank statement items based on the external transaction codes provided by the banks .
    The standard posting rules will clear a GL bank account using a set of algorithms for further interpretation set of standard algorithms do not meet the clearing criteria.
    Hence I need userexit / badi / bte to enhance the automatic clearing rules. EXIT ZXF01U01 / FEB_BADI are triggering before posting the document.
    So we cannot use these. Please suggest me regarding the same.
    Thanks in advance
    Somu.

    Hi,
           Did you get a solution for this problem from any other means? Cause I am also facing the same problem. It will be great if you can  help me in this regard.
    Thanks
    Sudheer K

  • Clearing rules

    Dear colleagues,
    I'm using clearing rules to clear customer open line items. I've defined one for deudor accounts. I tested for a manual payment and it worked correctly, but when I tried to test it for an automatic payment, It didn't bring me all the fields that I defined in the clearing rule to the cleared line item.
    Do you know why it doesn't work for all the fields in automatic payment program?
    Thanks in advanced,
    Olga

    Step 1 should probably not sort by invoice number.  That is not usually sequential for a utility.  And then it would basically be the same as step 2 which should work.

  • Document Clearing Rule

    Hi,
    All Experts.
    I want to what is clearing rule in FI ( OBIA & OBIB )? In mysystem OBIA is blank but in OBIB it is showing in Account Type K and clearing Rule is CH where it is not define in OBIA. So from where it come exactly ? I am facing one problem that when I am posting one clearing entry through F-04 i am getting Mesage Class X short Dump. I am not able to solve that Short Dump.
    I thought it may be generating more line items which is overflowing by system and having relation with clearing rules , specifically summarization of line items !
    Could any one focus on this ?
    Your help will be great on this.     
    Regards,
    Sharvari Joshi.
    Edited by: Sharvari Joshi on Feb 17, 2010 5:32 PM
    Edited by: Sharvari Joshi on Feb 17, 2010 7:11 PM

    Experts please help.
    Regards,
    Sharvari Joshi.

  • Clearing Rules for Defferals

    We have requirement where if the deferral date is populated in the document  or item then any incoming payment should not clear that item or document in cases where deferral date is in future,
    Any item with no deferral date should clear, any excess payment should be posted as on account payment,
    deferral items or document should only clear if the deferral date is in the equal to or less than to system date
    I need help in setting up clearing rules to support above requirement, please extend your help.

    Hi,
    If you are unable to get the desired result through configuration, then code custom program logic  in FI-CA Event 110 to distribute your incoming payment amount.
    In this Event, you can inspect for the attributes of the items to be cleared (e.g. Deferral Date greater than payment date), and decide on the amount to be posted as Payment on Account.
    If you are not familiar with FI-CA Events, go into transaction FQEVENTS and read the function module documentation for Event number 110.
    Regards,
    Ivor M.

  • Automatic Clearing Rule for Customers

    Hi,
    I have a query regarding Automatic clearing rules for the Customers.
    I want to clear all the debit balances against all credit balances for each customer (irrespective of the assignment). The exact amounts are not matching though.
    Can this be configured for Cusomers in 'Automatic Clearing Rules'?
    Please Advise.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Safi

    Hi,
    You can use the transaction code F-32 to clear debit and credit items of a customer account. You can only clear open items from one account. You can use this function to clear debits and credits that balance to zero (for example, invoices and payments that have already been entered into the customer account).
    Reward points if it is helpful.
    Thanks
    Ram

  • Clearing rule in FICA

    Hi,
    In my current project there is a clearing rule to clear the open amounts.
    suppose customer has two open items:-1. Electric bill(enery bill):-$100
                                                                     2. water heater(non-energy bill):-$50
    If customer pays $50(exact amount of water heater) then first water heater bill will be cleared.
    If customer pays $70 then electric bill will be cleared.
    I want to know are there any standard fuction module or program which decides which amount will be clear first? or it is totally controled by SPRO confiuration?
    Thanks
    Soni

    1
    For clearing you use the transaction F.13 and use the option G/R account special process. In this case the field assignment field is not important.
    An other option to Prepare Automatic Clearing and set up ther for the GR/IR account a rule based on PO an PO line item number
    There are to sort keys for PO's use the ome with order / line item
    Paul

  • Invoice reference field in Clearing rules

    Hi
    I am trying add field REBZG-Invoice reference in OBIA t.code (Clearing rules for GL) . Requirement is while clearing the document system has to post separate clearing document for each invoice.
    Then system saying field not permitted.
    Pls advice
    Thanks in advance
    Sneha

    Hello,
    In the customer master set the grouping KNB1-ZGRUP
    Also select "single payment" check box.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Clearing rule for BRS

    Hi,
    can any one please tell me how BRS happens in SAP, and on which basis documents cleared after the BRS. My intention asking this question is that where we are making the settings for clearing a document. I hope my questiion is clear. Iam expecting step by step explaination.
    Thank& regards
    Shankar chitupolu

    Hi:
           Welcome to SDN..if you are on manual BRS FF67 then following is the procedure to change the clearing rules. BRS gets posted as per setting in clearing rules ..Based on assignment number or reference number BRS gets posted to main account. Hi:
    Please follow as given and hopefully it will help you...
    1...Go to SPRO...Financial Accounting....Bank...Business transactions...Payment Transactions...Manual Bank Statement..Create a new transaction with sign - and do not assign anything in posting rule for now and enter 15 (based on it data will be entered in assignment field) in Algorithm field , save.
    2...In define posting keys and posting rules...create an account symbol for the one you did in step 1..In Assign account to account symbol please use account symbol created earlier and acc mode + and currency should be + too. In GL Account area please list the outgoing GL initials which you are using for outgoing postings..
    In create key for posting rule define a posting rule and now go back to step 1 and assign the posting rule you created to the transaction type
    In define posting rules please maintain posting rule as define above...in posting area assign 1. give nothing in first posting key.assign account symbol as created earlier...now give give posting key 50..give account credit Bank...and a suitable document you use for posting BRS...In posting type give 4.
    Your Manual Bank statement is ready ....
    Go to FS00 select your bank outgoing GL account there and in create/bank.interest tab double click on Field status group..in general data make assignment number mandatory for posting...
    Go to FB50....post and outgoing transaction using the GL given above it will require you to enter assignment number enter 123 and post. In FF67 Select the new statement , proceed with your normal data entry and give the transaction you created in above , enter value date, amount and in bank ref field enter 123 as given in FB50.
    Save and post it. Now it should work.
    Regards
    Edited by: Atif Farooq on Oct 9, 2011 6:21 PM

  • Clearing Rule example PLEASE!

    Hi guys: Below is my business situation.
    When I post an entry using F-04, I want to transfer the data in ref key 1 of the cleared item to the item that is being created as a residual item.
    I was thinking I could use Clearing Rules. Can someone please help me? Does anyone have an example please? Or is there any other way to do this?
    thanks
    Brian

    hi,
    You can map it through clearing rules. Clearing rules are used for automatic clearing. You specify whci all field should be considered for automatic clearing. For eg, PO number, referance field. etc if any match is found then it will clear.
    In you case you can try substitution.
    Thanks,
    Sujai C

Maybe you are looking for

  • [SOLVED] MSI GT70 keyboard buttons not working

    Hi! I am a normal user of computers that like games, so I bought this awesome notebook MSI GT70 i7 16gb ram GTX 675MX 128ssd+750hdd, with a keyboard by steelseries. Everything was ok, using the notebook as came when I bought, with OS windows 8, with

  • Unable to print, pages not selected.

    I have reader XI and I get an error message saying unable to print pages not selected.  the only things on the forum have been they same error with reader 9.  I have tried all of those fixes with no luck.  I have to open Acrobat with the Internet to

  • Material Document Numbers

    Hi Experts, Good day! We have a scenario where in we did confirmation of Process Order in COR6 and a corresponding material document was created, to be specific the document number created is 4928609490. Then after confirmation in COR6, we cancelled

  • Can't play video online

    When on the internet, videos won't play.  Screen where video is remains black.  Sometimes sound and no video.  But no video.  Can any one help?

  • Need an alternate Javahelp search engine

    Hi Friends, I have been facing this problem with Javahelp for a few months now. I have created a Javahelp system for my application and it works absolutely fine. However, I am not happy with the way the search works. As the Javahelp search engine use