Object locked after Release and Transport to QAS/PRD

During an attempted recovery of our DEV system, a tranport request that had been previously released and transported to QAS/PRD was copied back into the DEV system, over-writing an open change request (and associated lock) on the program.
As a result the object shows as 'Locked' in DEV, but the lock entry is on a 'Released' transport.
I have reviewed tables E070 and E071, and as expected the entries for the program show that the transport was released. 
Table TLOCK contains an entry for the program indicating that it is locked under the change request described above, that has already be released.
I logged a message with SAP, and was directed to create a new change request and assign the program to that request.  While this does work, and allows me to make corrections and transport them, it does not assign a lock to the new transport, and does not clear the existing lock.
The other comment in the message was that once a transport is released, the only other option is to 'hack the tables', but I am not sure I am ready to go that route.
Has anyone ever encountered this situation, and if so, do you have any situations as to how to clear the lock entry ?
Thanks in advance for any assistance you can provide.
R. Runtz
SAP Support, Government of Manitoba

Hi Robert
You can unlock objects using transaction SE03:
  SE03   > Requests/Tasks   > Unlock Objects (expert tool)
Imre Takácsi-Nagy
Senior Support Consultant II.
SAP Global Support Center Austria
Netweaver WEB Application Server ABAP / JAVA

Similar Messages

  • Update teminated message after releasing and saving PO

    Hello Friends,
    After releasing and saving PO in ME29N ...when pressing BACK button...i am getting a pop message with "updated terminated".
    then i enter...in inbox the below message i am getting.
    System ID....   DEV
    Client.......   600
    User.....   ABAP
    Transaction..   ME29N
    Update key...   BAC6150D3B4CE853F588CFC55F23
    Generated....   17.04.2007, 11:08:13
    Completed....   17.04.2007, 11:08:53
    Error info...   00 671: ABAP/4 processor: PERFORM_TOO_MANY_PARAMETERS
    Even I debugged ...with break point satement with 'message' but not able to capture the "updated terminated'.
    Let me know how to sort this bug??
    With Ever Smile & Warm Regards,
    Madhu..!!

    Hi,
    Go to ST22 Transaction and Analyse the DUMP of this clearly in detail
    and discuss the same with a MM functional consultant and solve the issue.
    reward if useful
    regards,
    Anji

  • Cross system object lock after SP24 upgrade

    Hi Team,
    We have recently updated from Sol Man SP23 to SP24. I have set-up cross system object lock (CSOL) in SP23. It was working perfectly.
    When we are in SP23, i have made following settings:
    In T.code: u201C/TMWFLOW/CONFIG_SERVICESu201D , i have set he conflict analysis as "Cross-Project, Cross-Client". So i that i will always get "Warning" Messge while processing SDHF and SDMJ correction.
    In t.code: /n/TMWFLOW/CMSCONF , the CSOL is active.
    Recently we have upgraded to SP24. After SP24 upgrade, the CSOL is not working properly. The configurations are same as earlier.(Before SP24). Now if i process SDMJ or SDHF corrections, the CSOL always gives me "ERROR" message but i want to get "WARNING" message as earlier. I have checked the conflict analysis in t.code u201C/TMWFLOW/CONFIG_SERVICES". It is still "Cross Project, Cross-Client" only.
    Any additinal SAP notes to be implemrnted to correct this behaviour.
    Your valuable guidance required.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    I dont believe this is possible at the moment. As you must be already aware, that SAP releases the locks from the objects as soon as the transport request is released from the Development System. Unless, this locking mechanism is extended to various systems first (DEV and QAS) and later to parallel landscapes (eg:- Project landscapes) it would be difficult to bring in this feature.
    Rgds,
    Abhijeet Bhagat

  • Objects locked after crash in Integration Repository (Design)

    Hi there,
    Unfortunately the integration repository (Design) crashed during an import of some IDOCS from a R3 system.
    Now when I try to login again into the Integration Repository and do any changes in the software component, I get a warning telling me that the object Im trying to edit is currently beig edited by my own account.
    How can I remove this object lock so I can continue working with this object? is there any admin tool from where I can release the locked objects or something like that?
    Thanks Rob.

    Hi Rob
    I presume you use XI 2.0.
    Execute transaction sm12 to release the locks.
    Regards
    Venu

  • Po change after release and printout

    Dear Experts,
    My client require if we change the PO in any field ( expect qty and amount ) our po should be go in the po release again we using release indicator 4 and 6 but we want release should be go if we change any field like date tax code text payment terms etc.
    RCR

    Hi,
    System determines new release strategy only if there are any changes in the characteristic values in the PO. (The characteristics that you must have defined for the PO release strategy configured in your case, like PO value, document type, Plant, etc.)
    By your question, it appears that you do not want to change even the date and text fields after PO is released, and in case you do the changes, then again the PO has to be released.
    For this, you need to use the release indicator, which won't allow any changes after PO is final released. Hence, when any of the field is required to be changed, the release will be required to be cancelled first, then the changes can be done. After doing the necessary changes in your fields, like, date, text, etc., PO will again be subjected to release, and will have to be released again to proceed further.
    Regards,
    Zafar.

  • Objects jumping after releasing mouse/entering information manually

    Hello all,
    I hope I can explain this without the benefit of video... I just started having a weird problem in Illustrator CS5. When trying to do some precise placement of objects and points, I notice that the objects/points are moving slightly from where I intended. For example, I am trying to place the end point of a line on top of the end point of another line. I am zoomed in all the way, I drag the point into JUST the right place, smart guides are on and read "intersect"—in other words, it's locked in, right in place. Then, when I release the mouse button, the point jumps diagonally up or down a few clicks. It's really weird too, because sometimes it will jump say, up and to the left, sometimes down and to the right. The only constant is that I can't place things where I want them. It is driving me nuts!
    Also, I just noticed it happens even if I enter numerical information. For example, if I have a shape and I enter the width as 20 mm, after I hit return, it changes it to 19.756 mm.
    Has anyone else had this problem? I have tried everything. Smart guides on/off, all the guides are off, snap to point, snap to grid, etc. all off. I have deleted my preferences and .plist and restarted... This is version 15.0.2 and I don't think there is an update available.
    Any help or advice you could offer would be greatly appreciated. Thank you so much in advance!

    You are welcome, ornmnt.
    I believe you should have a look at the File>New document settings. The setting was introduced in CS5, seemingly under the assumption that all users would prefer to have it on, at least in RGB documents with the Web document profile or Flash Catalyst document profile.

  • Repository Objects Locked after Import

    Hi there,
    we have 2 XI lines. In one we have an issue and so we export/imported the rep. objects out of the dev. system XI1 and imported them into XI2.
    On XI2 (which has a dedicated SLD) we did not define anything in the SLD.
    Now we need to continue developing - but in XI2 we cannot modify the objects anymore - they are locked. I know that this is a good thing if u transport. But for its a disaster if we had do re-do everything.
    Does anyone has a hint how we could tweak this issue?
    Thanks in advance!
    Helge
    PS We're using XI 3.0 SP16 (NW 2004)

    Hi Helge,
    >>>Your book about XI & IDOCs is here on my desk.
    glad to hear that:)
    thanks
    Regards,
    michal

  • Edit Problem after changing and transporting a table view

    Hallo Experts,
    I hope you can help me.
    I changed a Z-table in the Data Dictionary. For this table there exists an Tableview.
    After I added three new fields I generate a new tableview:
    Utilities -> table maintenance generator
    Change -> create maintenance screen -> ok
    after this I optimized the layout of the screen.
    On our Enviromentsystem my Tableview works perfect.
    I can make changes in the table.
    Then I transported the new tableview to our testsystem.
    There I started the sm30 "Maintain table view" and tried to change table entries.
    After a click on "Maintain" the following Message appears:
    TK 730 Changes to Repository or cross-client Customizing are not permitted.
    The strangest thing is, that before my transport, it worked, I could change table entries.
    There were no changes on the userrights.
    And I can change a similar table on the testsystem.
    I compared the properties of both tables. But I could not find a difference.
    Have anybody an idea where the error can be?

    Hi
    Caution: The table is cross-client
    Message no. TB113
    Diagnosis
    You are in the process of maintaining a cross-client table. You are using the standard table maintenance screen here, which is frequently used to maintain client-specific Customizing entries. This message serves to warn you that each change you make will have an effect on all other clients in the system.
    System response
    You have the authorization required for cross-client maintenance.
    Procedure
    Think carefully about the effect of your changes. Due to logical dependencies between client-specific Customizing and applications data on the one hand and cross-client Customizing data on the other hand, changing or deleting cross-client data could result in inconsistencies.
    Therefore such changes should be carefully planned and coordinated, taking all the clients in the system into consideration.

  • New object M_LPET_LGO after release change

    Hello,
    we are in the progress of a release change from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0.
    Now we are testing the authorizations and roles.
    Some user got the error (/nSu53) that the object M_LPET_LGO is missing.
    When we analyze this object in SU24, we did not find any transaction assigned to object M_LPET_LGO ????
    Gruß
    Toni

    Hi ,
    guessing, found a note from  2004  there is correction note (770961) probably SAP has created the object  by themselves for ECC6.0  so that customer can add this element manually based on the need.
    lets wait for some expert from SAP to answer, I have seen two major  objects like this so far. Did SAP forget to insert them into a transaction or they found it be useful along  with various  other MM transactions?

  • External Drive is Locked After Archive and Install

    Hello,
    I took my iMac to the Apple Store this morning to have the Hard Drive worked on. (Permissions on the Library were messed up somehow) The woman at the Genius Bar did an A&I (keeping the home folder the same) which did the trick. I now come home to find my external drive for Time Machine locked!
    It is a Western Digital My Book Studio, and is partitioned into two: one for data storage, one for Time Machine (500 GB each). Both partitioned sections are locked (little lock sign on the lower-left). Here is what the Permissions say under Get Info for the drive:
    *My Admin. Account (Me) - Custom*
    *My Other Account (also admin.) - Custom*
    *My Admin. Account (Me) - Read & Write*
    *Staff - Read & Write*
    *Everyone - Read only*
    *Ignore ownership on this volume is checked.*
    I did not set the permissions to this, nor did I ever fool with the permissions on the external. I now can't access the data on the disk, nor use Time Machine.
    Thanks in advance,
    C h r i s t o p h

    I suspect if it was run on the Time Machine partition something funny happened with all the gazallion hard links utilized by Time Machine, because of the use of the recursive function (the "-R") with the change flags commands. To simply unlock the volume you would just use:
    sudo chflags nouchg /Volumes/"Partition Name"
    The recursive command would have started going thru the entire file hierarchy looking for things to unlock, and, with a Time Machine drive, you can get rather startling results with Terminal commands, because of the way Apple set-up the file system.
    Francine
    Francine
    Schwieder

  • Condition doesn't work after transport to QAS system.

    Hi all:
          the condition doesn't work after the workflow transported to QAS system.  the workflow designed has a constraint that only the creation of the document of Type M4 can trigger the workflow, but creation of Type M5 document can also trigger the workflow, could you please tell me the possible reason?
    Thank you very much

    Hi,
    Once Try checking as pavan suggested whether the Customizing requested is transported.
    To Maintain Workflow start conditions you can also maintain through SWB_COND and ensure its transported.
    Regards
    Narin

  • Transporting an ABAP query from DEV to QAS/PRD

    Hi all,
    I am trying to modify an existing query in DEV and move it to QAS and then to PRD. After making the changes in DEV, there was new transport request created, in which I had the changes for the query and in se93, i changed the name of the prog to the newly generated prog. after moving the transport to QAS, it is giving me a dump saying that the new prog generated in dev does not exist in QAS and hence the tcode does not work.
    after that i tried with the standard SAP report "rsaqr3tr" and tried to make another transport assuming that the program would be together with the transaction and will be transported together. But this does not work.
    I need help regarding this please - since it is an urgent rek - how do i transport the query after making changes to the already existing one - from DEV to QAS or PRD?
    Please explain in detail where and what I am missing.
    Thanks!
    Related answers are appreciated and rewarded.

    Hi Shyam.
    I would like to suggest a few references,
    [SDN - References for Query related to transport request|Query Related to Transport Request;
    [SDN - Reference for Transport Management System (TMS)|Transport Management System (TMS) of R/3;
    [SDN - Reference for Transport Request Problem|Transport reruest problem............;
    [SDN - Reference for Transport request Query|Query Transport;
    Hope that's usefull.
    Good Luck & Regards.
    Harsh Dave

  • Purchase order changes after release

    Hi,
    How can I block a purchase order to any changes after release it and then, in case of need, mark for deletion the purchase order itens?
    Regards,
    Maria

    Hi,
    To block any changes in the purchase order to after release, set Changeability  indicator as 1 for  Release ID "R" in following path & save.:
    SPRO ->MM - Purchasing -> PO -> Rlease Procedure for PO -> Define Release for PO -> Release Indicator
    NOTE:If you set  Changeability  indicator as 3, PO can be changed after release and trigger a  new release strategy based on value changes.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Objects in transports are not locked after DB migration

    Hi all,
    we had an OS\DB migration to Linux\Oracle.
    The transports were Not released prior to the migration.
    after migration, when changing an Object the system asks for a new transport allthough there a transport allready exists  with the locked object.
    this way , we have the same object in 2 different transports - and the system displays the object is locked in both.
    please advise.
    many thanks.
    Orit
    Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please have a look in the SAP Netweaver or Software Logistics forums.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Nov 25, 2011 1:57 PM

    Characteristic are locked after data load; try loading and than check it.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards

  • How to transport Enqueue and Dequeue Objects / Lock Objects / R3

    Hi Gurus,
    i have created two lock Objects.
    I transported those objects in Q system but the table tab has no objects.
    But in Dev every thing is correct.
    Could you please indicate how i can get the objects correctly transported?
    Thanks

    Easy and best approach is by getting them re transported by using transport of copy request (Type of request)
    1) Get the Transport of copy request created by basis team / urself under your user.
    2) Go to SE10 and highlight the request and click on include objects icon
    3) Later in the pop up window select the radio button which mentions "Include free objects"
    4) Then in the next screen mention the details based on the attributes of the Enque and deque object or else provide the package name and execute and in the next screen choose the concerned enque and deque objects and include them in the request.
    5) Transport the Transport of copy to quality.
    Also, more easiest is.
    Find out the task of the request with with the enque and deque objects were created with (if more than one select all), and then include the tasks in the transport of copy and transport it to next system
    If you are not able to do the above two steps then i think the object is $TMP object, kindly cross check.
    Cheers

Maybe you are looking for

  • Changing Field Description in  T.Code FBCJ

    Hi SAP Gurus, I am facing a problem with the T.Code FBCJ.  In our organisation we have several branches where they use to save the Cash Payment transactions, they do not post it.While posting the transaction at HO, if the authorised person finds that

  • SAP CRM 7.0 connected to Legacy system

    Dears - we have the requirement to connect our SAP CRM system (7.0) - that is a brand-new installation NOT to ECC, but to a legacy system. We have planned to implement custom interfaces to replicate the masterdatas. Doubt is: can you point out which

  • Problem setting the PoolList attribute in a WLST script

    Hello ! I ran the configToScript command over config.xml which has a JDBCMultipool composed of two JDBCpools. It threw the next script to create the JDBC Multipool: print 'configuring resource: JDBCMultiPool/MyJDBC MultiPool ' try: myResource = creat

  • Automatic Payments (F110), Steps Needed

    Gurus, Needed are the steps for F110 (Auto Payments). Kindly enumerate and explain. Thanks.

  • Info object Creation

    Hi, I have a field in R/3 with the length of 250 but in BW iam not able to create the infoobject with same length250.Max length is 60 it is saying.Is there any alternative for this. Thanks in Advance, Haji