Operation Level Approval Policy Creation Issue in OIM11gR2
Hi Experts
I have successfully registered approval process without any issues but while creating Operation Level Policy I have referred the approval process which I have registered before. While clicking Finish button I’m getting below exception in sysadmin console itself.
Auto registration of approval process “default/aaa!1.0 <approval process name>” failed while creating policy “XXX” Register the approval process manually.
Have anyone faced this issue before ? Is anything I have missed in registering approval process?
Please help me to fix this issue...
Edited by: Vaitheeswaran Balakumar on Jan 2, 2013 1:22 AM
Edited by: Vaitheeswaran Balakumar on Jan 2, 2013 4:23 AM
Hi,
But the question is: If it works for Level-1 approver, Why is it not working for Level-2 approver?
Regards,
Jubish
Similar Messages
-
Why Template, request and operation level approval from 11g?
Hi All,
I''m very new to OIM 11g and could not understand the logic behind having three categories of approval workflow, sucn as Template, operational and request level approvals? In 10 g, on the contrary, we can achieve multiple level approval using one approval process against a resource object. Having said that, i think we can also achieve a multi level approval in one BPEL process using the serial or parallel type of approval. So, a single approval process, say request level approval process can be configured to catered to multiple level of approvals. If this is the case, i could not figure out the reason behind the availability of 2 further categories template and request level approval. Can anyone please shed light on the actual usage with a context and also render reference to a 10 g functionality for these approval categories.
Thanks,
SriniRequest Level & Operation Level :
Re: Difference requestlevel and operational level
Template Level : It is also same as Request Level where you can reject the complete request in one shot. In latest version of OIM i.e. OIM 11g R2, you won't find this Approval Level. -
Wierd Issue In Approval Policy OIM 11.1.1.5.0 BP03
Folks,
We are facing a very weird issue in our dev env . We have developed approval workflow for Assign role request type .
Here's what we have done .
- Template level is auto -approved (via checkbox)
- Request level approval policy (No rules) is created and is auto - approve (tried with both via check box and defaultAutoApproval SoA composite)
- Operational level policy (Rule = Role Name = ABC) is created and SOA composite is assgined .
Now, whenever we raise a request , request level approval is never auto approved , intead the approval task is assigned to xelsysadm always ???
Any clues ??
Thanks
SidHi,
As you said there is no rule created for request level approval policy if so, default policy gets evaluated for request level and hence default approval process gets triggered.
to suppress this default approval policy and approval process to trigger, you need to create rules for your request level policy and make it auto approval.
Regards,
Raghav. -
Assign role request through code not going to Operational level
Hi All
We are trying to assign roles through code using the OIM API's as suggested in the documentation
"http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/doc.1112/e28183/oim_up.htm#autoId40".
We have 2 Approval policies one is at Request Level (i.e. Auto Approval) and the other is Operational level(Scope=ALL Scope) with workflow, So once the request is getting raised with the code successfully it is getting completed. The expected behavior is that it should go to the approval workflow attached at operational level.
When we tried to attach a workflow at the request level, the request is going through Approval workflow attached at request level and once we approve at request level it is getting completed and not going to operational level.
But we will have Request level as auto approved and Operational level with two level of Workflow.
Thanks in AdvanceCheck whether you have configured Request Type in your approval policy properly for operational level approval. In the Rule Components section check whether you have configured everything correctly. Also dont raise the request from system admin login as it will be treated as a direct provisioning request and your approval policies will not be invoked. Login through an end-user and test it
-
Operation level not getting auto approved
Hi ,
Can anyone help me to make operation level request auto completed in oim 11g R2use Identity System Administration console and create new approval policy:
- select request type
- set Auto Approval check box
- select scope
- set rule (meet your requirement)
a. -
Issue with PO release (multi level approval)
Hi,
Need help regarding PO release. I am working with 4 level approval process.
Information:
it is sequential release as I can see in workflow log, a new workflow gets generated for next level only after previous level executes the workitem.
Facing following issue at 2nd Level :
Level 2 releases item and it goes to Level 3, but workitem doesnt disappear from inbox.Once Level 3 releases item, an acceptance mail goes to Level 2. But along with the mail, updated workitem (i.e. showing release by 3rd level) also appears in inbox of Level2. Now two work items appear in Level2 Inbox.
In Workflow Log, this is how its behaving:
WORKFLOW STARTED-->
1st WF appears in WF log.
Level 1 releases WI ->
2nd workflow appears in WF log +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 2 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 3 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 3 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2 and Level3) along with the mail.
Level 4 releases WI ->
4th WF appears +
3rd WF appears (in process status) +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (STATUS COMPLETED)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 4 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2, Level3 and Level 4) along with the mail.
Result:
PO gets released.
In workflow log 2nd, 3rd and 4th workflow appear with IN PROCESS STATUS. All of them show process stopped at LEVEL2.Hi Kjetil,
Release strategy is being used. Configuration for release strategy is given as following.
RGroup Rcode Workflow Agent
Z6 R1 1 Blank
Z6 R1 1 Blank
Z6 R1 1 Blank
Z6 R1 1 Blank
Release is sequential.
For column 'Agent' mentioning position or User is not really useful because we are getting agents through Z table. Reason is: current org structure supports 1 position with multiple users from same department. In our scenario we need to find initiators department then find relevant approval levels for that departemnt. So I cannot mention any position in 'Agent' Column as release code will be locked against one position and one departetment.
Agents picked through Z table. Table has fields Agent/ UserID , level, department.
Logic to pick agents( Object and method created ):
When workflow starts, it finds department of the initiator.
For that department-> find approval levels available(L1, L2, L3).
For these levels -> Find Agent mentioned for that level.
Onece Agents are found for all levels -> Pass them to WF container.
In task activity, These agents are passed back to the rule and the task comes to know which agent it should go to.
Result : Four workflows start in sequence. When last level releases, only 1st workflow shows COMPLETED status. Rest three hang at level 2. If I see Me29N , release for that item is shown completed. To me it seems triggering of only first workflow is enough for release. Is there any way I can avoid trigerring of other three workflows?
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:30 AM
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:31 AM -
Custom AWE Line Level Approval Issues
Has anyone had success creating custom AWE Line Level Approval? I’m having trouble trying to get the method for line approval to fire. I have header level working so I decided to dig deeper. I added the line keys to the Xref table, Updated the Registry, Configured the Events, and created a new Process Definition using line level (very simple “Always True”). I have seen OnProcessLaunch fire so my routing has begun. The graphics look good. But when my approver goes in and hits the Approve button, it saves and nothing happens to the approval. Tracing it shows that no methods are firing. How does the system know to fire the line level method vs the header level method? Any ideas are appreciated.
ThorLine 14: radioChange resolved - I had named my radio button
the same as the id of the field I was trying to update.
because you can't see the generated source it did not jump
out at me. then I backed some code out and my radio button lit up.
for a second I could not figure out for the life of me why
it would do that. then I remembered that in IE it will also use the
name in the getElementByID. -
Database Creation Issue.
Hi,
I have successfully installed Oracle 10g on Solaris 8.
But when I try to create the DB using DBCA during the start of the DB creation at around 2% I get a "TNS: network adapter error"
Does anybody know the reason for this error?
Thanks in advance.This error means:
ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
Cause: A generic protocol adapter error occurred.
Action: Check addresses used for proper protocol specification. Before reporting this error, look at the error stack and check for lower level transport errors. For further details, turn on tracing and reexecute the operation. Turn off tracing when the operation is complete.
Connectivity issues shouldn't arise at this moment. Are you using your os oracle user to perform this task?
Are your environment variables properly set?
~ Madrid -
Operation level Component Assignment
In MTO scenario with VC and Engineering, the sales order specific engineering BOM is
derived through VC and around 80% complete at the time of sales order creation.
Engineering activities are carried out and sales order specific production BOM is derived
very late in the process.
So, operation level component assignment is not at all possible in advance.
need to get different components assigned to different operations at at time of
production order creation/change automatically.
Is there any function module,exit or Bapi or some other method with help of which
operation level component assignment can be done automatically in the production order.Hi,
Just a quick thought:
If your order is having status CRTD or REL (but without any confirmations, goods issue, settlements) then you can use the Read PP Master Data (Order header - Functions - Read PP Master Data) & this will re-read your routing & BOM. But for this to work for you, the routing should be updated with the assignments.
So what you could do is start processing your order as late as possible, thereby you can re-read the BOM & Routing as the modifications take place.
But if this is not possible in your scenario, then i am not aware of a BAPI or a FM which adds components to different operations in production order, you might evaluate writing a BDC program for the same. Anyways will update you if i manage to find a BAPI or a FM for this.
Hope the above helps.
Regards,
Vivek -
Approval process creation steps using JDeveloper in OIM 11g R2
Hi,
Please help me to create approval process creation using JDeveloper and how to use the approval process in OIM provision in OIM 11g R2.
Thanks in Advace,
srinirefer developer's guide to get the detailed steps. http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E27559_01/dev.1112/e27150/request.htm#BABFFJDH
Also refer OBE tutorial http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/oim/oim_11g/Custom_Approval_Process_for_Resource_Request/custom_approval_process_for_resource_provision.htm#t3
There will be slight changes in the steps as this OBE is for 11gR1.
High level steps:
Create a new application using the following command
ant -f <OIM_HOME>/server/workflows/new-workflow/new_project.xml.
It will be created in OIM_HOME/workflows/new-workflow/process-template/ directory
Openthe .jws file in jdeveloper and edit the default human task and add whatever logic is needed.
Then deploy the composite after which you need to create an approval policy and link the SOA composite created
Edited by: Durgaprasad on Apr 24, 2013 1:55 AM -
SRM 7.0 SP05 - BRF Item level approval does not work
Hi Experts,
I am working on process controlled workflow for shopping cart approval process. I have defined necessary process levels and workflow works fine for a single item SC.
I have selected decision type as "Item-based approval for partial document" for each process level and hence expect each line item (according the start condition) should have it's own set off approvers, but instead of this, system determines approvers at header level and hence item which does not really need approval undergoes approval as well.
Could you please help me to resolve the issue?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
AmitHi Bharat,
Yes, we are using the copy of the standard implementation. We are looking into the BADI implementation and trying to assign a separate AREA GUID to each line item. Hopefully, when different aggents are assigned to these AREA GUIDs, it will enable the item level approval. I will keep you updated.
Meanwhile, it would be really helpful if you could share some sample code of such badi implementation which can help me to understand it more clearly.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit -
Cannot attach documents at order operation level in PM order.
Hi,
We have recently upgraded to EHP6 and I have activated the EAM business functions including LOG_EAM_CI_6. In my PM work order, on the Additional Data tab, I can see the "Document Assignment" section at the bottom. Here I attach an existing document and choose Assign to Order. Then I attach another existing document and choose Assign to Operation (0010). After saving the order if I go back into it (IW32/IW33). the document assigned to order header is still there but the document attached to the operation disappears.
I have defined the document type that I am assigning at header level and operation level in Customizing for Cross-Application Components under Document Management --> Control Data --> Define Document Types. I have also specified in Customizing that the assignment to objects PMAUFK (order) and/or PMAFVC (operation) is allowed for the document type of those documents.
Can someone please advise what's wrong here ? I have to attach/assign docs to operations.
Thanks,
SandyHi Sandy
Can you please make sure two things:
1) IMG --> DMS --> Control Data --> Define Document Types --> Select Doc Type ---> Define Object Links. It must be something similar to this one. Without entering CREATE DOCUMENT settings, you may not be allowed to attach a document. That might be causing the issue. If you do not want from within IW31, someone is creating documents then make sure this setting has value =2.
One more possible reason for this is 1:n field in this same setting. If 1:n is not selected, please read the help for that field and make sure the uniqueness of your document attachment to objects.
2) IMG --> DMS --> Control Data --> Maintain Screen for Object Link
For this one make sure that you have a screen entry for PMAUFK and PMAFVC.
Now if attachment does not work, try creating a document and let us know what is the error message.
And do you know that there is another way of attaching documents to the operation which is attaching them as PRT. Just select the operation, click on PRT button and select document and attach it.
I hope this will help.
Regards
Savas
Message was edited by: Savas Yazici -
In process inspection - Rejection Booking at operations level
Hi All,
Need some help regarding inporcess inspection.
As we aware about '03' insp type is not stock relevant
The requirement is , i having operations are like 0010 ,0020 ,0030 ,0040,0050 in Production order in Routing
Now while operation wise confirmation i want to book the rejection and that needs to get effect on further operation confirmation.
For example : Suppose I have confirmed 50 TON against operation 0020 , hence at the time of confirmation 0020 i want to book the rejection 2 TON
Hence while confirming 0030 system should not allow to cofirm 50 TON , system should allow to confirm only 48 TON through CO11N and Some where that rejection has to be display in report.
Is there any provision in standard to enter rejection at operations level.
Stock posting not required , Only qty tracking required like operation wise confirmation.
Please advise to make this scenario success.
Thanks,
AbhishekHi Abhishake,
As in inspection type 03 lot you dont have stock posting option, you can scrap the rejected material operation wise in CO11N at the time of confirmation (Mov Type 551).
As scraped material will no more in system, you can also look forward for bi-product assignment in bom if you don't want to go with first option.
Also you can check for early lot creation if can solve the purpose, as in this case you will get inspection lot of inspection type 04 at the time of release of production order and stock will be adde to quality inspection as you do confirmations operation wise.
Regards/Rohit -
FM/BAPI to update Production Order at Operation Level
Hi Friends,
Can any one help me in this issue.
My rek is, needs to update Production Order Sequence Number(AFVC-CY_SEQNRV) at operation level.
There are some Production Orders under one Project.User is updating theSequence Numberfor the first order in that group (TCode CO02),at the time of save remaining Orders in that group needs to be updated with the same Sequence Number.
Please provide me with FM/BAPI(operation level not at header level)
Points Rewarded,
Thanks in advance,
PRBode.Prathap,
Have you tried using the Bapi : BAPI_PP_TIMETICKET
This would confirm at operation level..
Hope it is useful.
Regards
Ram -
Line Item Level Approval For SC-SRM7.02
Hi Experts,
I am working on the line item level approval based on cost center. can some one help me in achieving this?
i have few doubts regarding this
1) we are using application controlled workflow is it feasible to achieve this functionality ?
2) will separate PO will be created for each line item?.
some pointer would be really helpful.Hi Mano,
1. Yes, but would suggest to use new process controlled workflow.
2. No, Cost center is not a split criteria for PO creation. Of course you can overwrite it with ABAP.
Regards
Konstantin
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi all, I trying on a FTP program which is upload and download a file from UNIX to window an vice versa. I had download a sun.net.ftp classes, and here is my code: import java.io.*; import java.util.*; import sun.net.ftp.*; import sun.net.*; public c
-
How do I handle a count overflow while running "end's" rotation drive in position control?
Hi everyone! We run a direct drive in position control mode and normally do oscillating movements i.e. +-10°. The Signal we get is a TTL with 120 counts/°. And with those counts we do our control. But now we want to run the motor permanent one direct
-
Canon MG5350 printing problem: missing parts of the image
I am trying to print a DVD sleeve which includes text and image and only the text is printing correctly. I have done a nozzle check and a print head realignment, this hasn't solved the problem. Here is a screenshot of the original .doc and below it,
-
Unabe to load moives with New Flash Player 11.8.800.94 installed.
No mater what I do, I can not see you-tube videos with the new Flash player 11.8.800.94 installed. I have remove ALL elements I can find, re-installed fresh.... Nothing. HELP! Windows Explorer 9 ----9.0.8112.16421 Windows 64 Bit system
-
Hi, So my search function does not find "Contacts", in order to search for contacts I need to go into the "Contacts" application/menu. Previously, I would be able to search for contacts using the Global search. Not sure if this is supposed to be a fe