Order Confirmation based on ATP

Dear Friends,
Is it possible to have automatic confirmation of the quantity in Stock Transfer Order based on ATP, just like what we have it in Sales order.
If yes, can you please explain me the procedure.
Regards,
Harsh

Harsh,
We dont have auto confirmation on the STOs. The reason is the process is transferring stock between two plants where in the sales order it is to customer. Generally process works as below,
STO is created, the delivery is created using VL04 or VL10 back ground job if the stock is there in supplying plant. Now the Delivery is GIed and stock is handed over to Carrier. Here confirmations is then through 856ASN to the STO and then GR on STO through EDI 846.
Kind regards
sandeep

Similar Messages

Sales order confirmation based on Consignment stock only.

Hi All,
i have a requirement at my client.
they want the SO to be confirmed based on the consignment stock only (no other stock like unrestriected etc).
i tried my best ans waiting for response from your side.
i tried to create a requirement class with 'stock type" K but was not succesfull. if someone know how to do that let me know.
Regards,
Pravin M
TCS canada

Pravin,
Let me see if I understand the requirements of your client. They want to confirm sales orders, to allow them to sell parts that don't belong to them (vendor consignment)? I can't imagine that this could be done in standard SAP. From a financial perspective, I would think they would first have to transfer the parts to their ownership "somehow" and create some kind of payable to the vendor, before confirming.
Anyhow, if the business users insist on this functionality, I believe you are facing some kind of custom programming that will modify the 'standard' workings of the ATP check.
Best Regards,
DB49

Order creation based on ATP

Hi,
I want to know is it posible to create sales order depending on the ATP for article through customizing if yes can pl. tell me the steps.
Atul

Hi,
ATP is run in the sale order if you have configured it in customizing.So based on your settings system will show the amount of stock available.So you can have the options of delivery proposal or complete delivery.
It can be created automaticaly.
Reward points if useful
Regards,
Amrish Purohit

Exit/Badi for to Stop PM Order Confirmation using IW41

Hi,
My Requirement is while doing PM Order Confirmation based on Order and Operation in IW41, system needs to check WBS element status.
If WBS element status is closed, It has to stop the Order Confirmation.
Kindly suggest any Exit or Badi for this.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Kumar

check below thread it has all the badis and exits summed up for iw41:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1121303

Service order confirmation in status "Completed To be Distributed"

All,
I have created a service order confirmation based on service order and it is in status "Completed To be Distributed" for a long time. It is not being distributed to ECC system also. Could you please let me know how to make it "successfully distributed".
Thanks,
Jenibalet S

Thanks for your reply, The executive service employee is present in ECC and when I reprocess the bdoc in SMW01 the service confirmation get the status "Contains Error Distribution Incorrect" and it is showing the following error " An error has occured in the system HT3CLNT200 while copying the document".
Moreover in SMMW01 I have forund the following error messages
Function module COM_KOSTENSET_GET does not exist
No mini-template types could be determined
Could you please help more on this?.
Thanks,
Jenibalet S
Edited by: Jenibalet S on Jul 15, 2009 5:55 PM

Partial Transfer Order Confirmation on Picking Process

We are on the picking process with a delivery and a tranfer order. Movement type MM/WM 601.
We have a transfer order item line for 10 units.
We would like to confirm 7 units against one handling unit and the other 3 units against a different handling unit.
We are using RF transaction pick&pack LM46.
The problem is that we don´t know how to split the line item in 2 different items within the transfer order.
We don´t want to confirm the TO with differences and create a new TO for the remaining 3 units. We don´t want either to confirm the TO using LT12 because the process has to be done trough standard SAP RF.
Could anyone help, please?

hi kumar
If you feel this answer suits your query. Please reward with points.
Transfer order confirmation based on shippingpoint
answer: no the transfer creation not at all based on shipping points.
The transfer confirmation you have to in lt12 transcton with teh rransfer order number. creation of transfer you can do in lt03 transaction with reference to the delivery frrom you will get transfer order number after that you have to confirm, so please work on that,
I hope this answer solve your query.
Thanks & Regards
Rack29

GATP : Loosing order confirmation

Hi,
I am facing a problem where I loose order confirmation for a line item with multiple schedule lines if I change one of the confirmed lines within the frozen period.
I understand GATP checks at item level. Then how to stop GATP not to check other schedule lines and check only the schedule line whose date is changed?
thanks in advance,
shan

Hi SHAN,
The Product Availability Checking Concept in APO is similar to that of R3.
Only that the GLOBAL AVAILABILITY CHECK in APO includes additional features as Product Allocation, Product Availability, Check against forecast, Rules Based ATP, Multi ATP etc.
Now when do we get multiple schedule lines:
On the Requested Delivery Date, if there is no stock available for a material
the confirmation falls on those dates on which there is stock expected.
EXAMPLE:
<b>MDO4 Screen:</b>
Material: xxxx, Plant: yyy
May 21, 2007: Stock: 0
May 23, 2007: PurchaseOrder - 10
May 24, 2007: Production Order: 10
Now when you place a sales order with a requested delivery date of May21, 2007 for 20 quantity. ( Say the Transit time =0 and there are no other sales orders placed for this material/plant)
You will see the following schedule lines
May 21, 2007: Confirmed Qty = 0
May 23,2007: Confirmed Qty=10
<b>May 24,2007: Confirmed Qty=10</b>
However say you had all the stock on May 23, 2007, you would have got only 2 schedule lines as follows
May 21, 2007: Confirmed Qty = 0
May 23,2007: Confirmed Qty=20
Lets think why this happens: The availability check is done against the SCOPE OF CHECK( Business Event-A and Availability Checking Group =xx on the material master) at the line item so that it checks all the incoming and outgoing receipts and requirements for the material in that plant and then arrives at the MATERIAL AVAILABILITY DATE which is determined according to the Stock Availability
The first schedule line is the date which you have requested the 20 quantity and the system gives you a confirmed qty for 0 on the date which you requested.
Now the other schedule lines are the confirmed dates which the system has proposed based on availability check.
Now coming to your question: When I change the date on one of the schedule lines
Say in this example: the third line which is bold
So in a way you are changing the DELIVERY DATE,
When you change the delivery date, availability check happens again at the line item and new schedule lines are determined.
The answer to your question- " Then how to stop GATP not to check other schedule lines and check only the schedule line whose date is changed?" is a BIG NO as it is against the AVAILABILITY CHECK Concept both in R3 as well as APO.
However I would not totally decline as there is nothing which we cannot do in SAP. With customizing(ABAP CODING) anything is possible. It would not be very easy and would you be willing to spend so much time.
If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask me.
Regards
Kumar Ayyagari
null

Open Orders (Confirmed and Un-Confirmed)

Hello BW Gurus,
I am looking for Standard BCT that can give me True Open Order "quantities" and "Amounts". The extractor 2LIS_11_V_SCL seems to give open order qty for "Confirmed" Schedules only. I am looking to get the "Net Open Orders" based on "Planned Goods Issue Date".
Any ideas on how to achieve this?
Thanks in advance.
Srini

Hi Lily,
But these extractors comprises of all orders thus, it means open orders,confirmed and not confirmed, delivered and not delivered, and orders that are already invoiced.
In my case, we need to have an open orders report meaning confirmed and not confirmed and where invoiced orders, delivered, and etc should not be included at all.
Any idea?
Thanks
Sheila

Email Sales Order Confirmation to "Created By" -

Hi Experts
I have a requirement where we need to email the Order confirmation output to the person who has created the sales order.
So lets say i am creating a sales order and my user id is 9999. (SY-UNAME).
Now as we have implemented HR module and our PERNR and user name are same.
So in other words my PERNR will also be 9999 and email is maintained in HR record and well as user record.
How can i achieve this functionality and Email order confirmation printout to "Created By".
We dont want to send order confirmation to SP or SH but just created by.
Thanks in advance.

HI Shiva,
I did exactly as you said but it send the email to the email ID maintained in Ship-to-party customer.
I think "Recipient" field is just used for cover page (Incase you are printing cover page), i dont think SAP uses it for sending the form output.
I think SAP sends output based on the partner function, so if i specify SH, SAP will send it to SH.
I tried using "Created By" partner type too and all email setting are maintained for the creator and printer is properly setup but it doesn't allow me to use this partner function.
I tried using both "$1" and "§§" but both of them doesn't work.
I have also tried using Employee responsible partner type "ER" but even that doesn't work.
Will appreciate if you can provide a solution for this.
Thanks in advance.

Credit block not allowing delivery dates on the order confirmations

Hello,
We are a full module SAP shop on ECC 6.0.
For one of our businesses, we have credit checking to take place at the time of Sales Order entry. This is causing an issue for the business because they are using Demand planning and need to have the Delivery Dates on the Order confirmations and they also want to be able to run an ATP check on the Sales Order. The credit check on sales order entry, prevents them from doing both of these things.
Does anybody know if there is a way to get the dates to show up on the order confirmations when a sales order is on credit block? Also, is it possible to run the order through ATP checking with this sales order credit block taking place?
thanks for your help!

Dear,
Ideally this question should have been posted in ERP SD forum.Please check out your credit check settings in OVAK and OVA8. Hopefully it help you.

COGI error generated while collective order confirmation

hi ALL, this is the real task for all PP GURUS.
the issue is related with collective order confirmation.
client is using customised program ZPP_CONF to confirm the collective order which is based on the sap spro program CORUPROC.this include automatic goods receipt,backflush & actual cost update .as user use zpp_conf for confirmation all this actions happened in backgruond.
now after using ZPP_CONF . the confirmation is not happening .instead of that it is going in COGI where they are getting a error massage which is as follows
"You have no authorization for this transaction with movement type 101u201D
this error continues for 10-15 minutes after doing refresh it goes. & confirmation happens.
this is not happening for all orders but for 8 out of 10.
users have proper authorisations.
they have enough stocks in st. locn.
they are loosing lot of time becuse of this.
HOW CAN I RECTIFY THIS ERROR GURUS?
when i search i found this is written in the CORUPROC documentation
Incl. incorrect goods movement: Not only preselected but also incorrect goods movements that are usually processed with transaction COGI are selected and processed.
VENKADESH

Hi,
The Program CORUPROC only can adjust the Errors in Goods movements. It can not handle the Table Locks..
The Program CORUAFWP, can taek care of table locks also, apart from the Errors in Goods Movements.
Refer below thread for similar type of problem..
COGI errors
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Siva

Changing the status of the sales order item based on reason for rejection

Hi All,
When a Sales order item is rejected then the status at the item level is changed as 'TECO'.When the reason for rejection is removed the status 'Teco' is reset.This status change can be achieved using the user exit 'MV45AFZZ'.But the exit does not allow re-atp calculation whenver a blocked item is release.I have use the exit 'MV45AFZB' ,through this the status change as well as re-atp calculation takes place.But the status changed(Based on reason of rejection) does not appear in the same screen.The change gets reflected only when the sakes order is saved and i open it again.
I want the status change to appear in the same screen.I am doing my code in the form 'userexit_check_vbap' of the exit 'MV45AFZB'. Please let me know if there are any user exits or BADI's available for the same(Changing the status of the sales order item based on reason for rejection ).
Regards,
S.Subasree

Hi subburamaiah
If you want the report you can create a separate SIS report . In that take the input field as a Reason for rejection.. and ask for the output the list of sales orders .Now when you check this user defined report you will give the reason for rejection and check what all orders got rejected on that reason for rejection.
Regards
Srinath

SSD based on ATP rule is not coming correctly

HI,
We have issue with one of the item for which Sheduled ship date based on ATP is going out of planning horizon, eventhough we have supplies available for it.
Issue in details:
1. We are creating manual IR and ISO for that item, by giving need by date say 3-Jan-15, but the ISO is having the SSD outside the planning horizon.
2. Checked for the available supply in ASCP planner workbench for the Org where ISO is getting booked and it is having enough supplies in the form of onhand, intransit shipments, planned orders. Checked for the onhand and it is pegged to Forecast demands and it is available to reserve and transact.
3. Checked for the item attribute for this part no, it has check ATP value as 'Material Only'
4. No ATP rule is defined in the item attribute for this item, also ATP component is having value as 'None'
5. Checked for the MRP item attributes and it is End assembly/soft pegging
6. Checked for the BOM and it has only single component in its BOM with the ATP flag unchecked for that component item in BOM and also at Org attribute level the ATP value is 'none' for component.
I am not able to figure out the reason why the SSD is going out of planning horizon eventhough there is enough supplies aviable in the ATP enabled ASCP plan.
Could you please help me for more checkpoints?
Thanks,
Avinash

HI Abhishek,
Thanks for the feedback, we have ATP results based on planning output. (Profile: INV:Capable to Promise=ATP/CTP Based on Planning output at site level)
We can see many exception messages generated for this item in ATP enabled ASCP plan:
1. Late supply pegged to Forecast
2. Orders with compression days
3. Past due Orders
4. Orders to be rescheduled in
5. Sourcing split percentage violated
Please check below screenshot for the same:
Also,
this plan has demand scheduled attached as Forecast sets
Thanks,
Avinash

Order Confirmation: Email as a PDF Document

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement that whenever the Sales Order gets created for specific Sales Org (for example S.Org 1022 only and not for 1023, 1024) and spcific Division (only 02 out of 02, 03, 04), it should trigger a mail with pre-draffted mail contents and a copy of Order Confirmation as an attachment in PDF format.
This mail should be sent to the mail id maintained in the definition of Sales Office.
Can this be mapped with Output determination? (I wanted to confirm it before doing because I have worked with Output determination but I have never used simple mail or EDI or External Send as a Transmission Medium)
I came up with 2 possibilities
1. Output Determination
2. Workflow (I dont know workflow at all)
Can somebody suggest me what is the proper way to map this requirement?
Quick reply will be appriciated.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
HP

T Code NACE
Create new Output type and assign access sequence based on your required fields. Assign the output program and smart forms to the output type and the partner function (may be SP) and default medium.
Output program should be able to read the sales office of the sales order sold to and then get the Email from it, else you can add a new partner function as contact person to the sold to and have the sales office Email ID in the contact person. The putput program can pick the contact persons email much easily than the sales office Email . Work with your ABAP person to get the putput program created as per your requirements.
Create the condition record for your output type. So once the output program is ready, you can process order for the relevant sales order and the output should get triggered in the order . based on the medium you assigned in the output condition type and / or output condition record it will be processed.
Hope this helps
Regards
Sai

Production order confirmed quantity

hello!
can i change the settings, that production order atp-check confirms quantities from e.g. purchase requisitions, not only stock in warehouse?
best regards,
matthias

hello!
every supplies are ticked in OPJJ. it works for receipts before demand from production order, but no receipts in future are confirmed.
Date                          MRP element                           Req/rec     Confirm     ***. ATP
04.03.2009     Stock                                                  1      0
12.03.2009     OrdRes     Totals record     3-     1      0
14.03.2009     PurRqs     Totals record     1      0      1
02.06.2009     -
>     End lead time     0      0      0
02.06.2009     PurRqs     Totals record     3      0      0
i would expect that the order confirms the quantity from the purchase requisition.
best regards,
matthias

Order Confirmation based on ATP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for