Order not distributed

Hi
The CRM Slaes Order  if we change anything its not distributing R/3( there is no sale order is created up to now) at the same time its not throwing any Bdoc error it very strange situation.
In Bodoc message” no upload into R/3”
For this I checked SAP Note791713 in that they mentioned check whether Badi CRM_SALESDOCU_R3A active or not
We checked that Badi also, its active.
Thanks in advance,
regards
Rami.
help will be rewarded

Hi,
Did you create R/3 site and the subscription 'All Business Transactions (MESG) subscription'. Without this subscription no sales document will get uploaded into R/3. After completing the above step then create a new sales order in CRM which get uploaded automatically into R/3 provided, if you have configured all other steps like no. ranges, transaction types etc.
Please refer to the best practice docuement C03 for complete configuration steps.
<b>Do not forget to reward if it helps,</b>
Regards,
Paul Kondaveeti

Similar Messages

  • Condition in purchase order not distributed in line items

    Hi All,
        I have a condition ZD21 (delivery charges) in purchase order.  When i enter the condition at header level, it supposed to distribute the charges among line items.  However sap put the entire amount in one of the line items.   The condition has condition class A (surchage), Calc typ B(Fixed Amt) and B as cond cat.   Header condition is selected (not item).
       Sometimes system populate an amount at the header level for this delivery charge.
    How can i get the amount to distribute to all line items ?  Also, where is the populated amount coming from ?  Anyone with any suggestions ?
    thanks
    joyce

    Hi Tej,
      Group condition and Header condition were selected.  I noticed that  for other plants, the delivery distribution works but not for this plant.  This wouldn't have anything to do with plants, right ?
    What is the group based on for Group Condition  ?   Thanks.
    Edited by: Joyce Chan on Jan 10, 2012 2:54 PM

  • Material ledger:not distributed variance-URGENT

    Dear all,
    For raw material A, it issued to certain production order(say FG is B) in Apr. at the month end, I found that there are some variance(not distributed) in material A due to there is no goods receipt for production order. in May. I performed GR for B, then calculate WIP/variance and perform settlement. after that, I run CKMLCP for ML closing.
    However, system can not distribute the variance which occurred in the previous month to B, this means this variance will keep in the variance account forever, and the actual cost of B is wrong.
    I do not know whether this is standard SAP, our version is ECC6.0.
    thanks,
    Ben

    Hi Ben,
    If you don't find the reason for 'not allocated', you should open a message in the system for SAP to check.
    Check note 908776. Here you will find all possible reasons:
    **'Not included' or 'Not allocated' price differences:                                                                               
    A) The material has multilevel consumption alternatives (processes).                                                                               
    Possible causes:                                                                               
    -  Multilevel price determination was not carried out yet.             
    -  Not all subsequent materials were processed by multilevel price     
    determination. If multilevel step has not been carried out (or          
    resulted in an error etc.) the price differences remain on the          
    input material in the 'not allocated' line.                                                                               
    You can verify the Actual BOM for all consumption processes to find 
    all output materials. You should check the status for multilevel in     
    all output materials                                                                               
    - the multi level document of one subsequent material is obsolet,       
      because it is older than the single level or multi level document of  
      the  input material.                                                  
      You can check this by comparing the time stamps in the documents'     
      header data.                                                          
      This situation occurs when the input material was reprocessed by      
      single level and/or multi level price determination, but not all      
      depending subsequent materials were reprocessed.                      
      To avoid such error SAP recommends to run multi level price           
      determination generally with the option:                              
      'materials already processed: process again'.                                                                               
    - For some consumption processes there was no goods receipt of the     
    output material in the period. In this case the price differences       
    can not be rolled up by multi level price determination. They           
    remain as 'not included' ('not allocated') at the input material.                                                                               
    -  For some consumption processes, that have different output          
    materials (joint production) for one of the joint products (the         
    materials that receive costs according to the apportionment             
    structure)  the goods receipt has not been posted yet. In this case     
    the differences to be allocated to this joint product remain as         
    'not included' ('not allocated') at the input material                                                                               
    -  One output was calculated with reduced BOM. Typically this happens  
    if input and output material are part of a cycle, and this cycle        
    was cut off because it didn't converge. In this case the price          
    differences of the input were not rolled-up along the cycle             
    connections and therefore remain on the input material. To verify       
    if this case applies check the multi level document of the output       
    material. There must be a red light in the item line of the input       
    material to indicate that no price differences have been rolled up.                                                                               
    In the header data of the multi level document you can see the          
    cycle number. Furthermore in the log of multi-level price               
    determination there may be a message 'Cycle * cut off after *           
    iterations'.                                                                               
    B) Material has Single level consumption alternatives                                                                               
    -  For release 4.7 or higher, the step 'Revaluation of consumption'    
    was not carried out. (This step is only available with Financials       
    Extensions).                                                            
    Regards,
    BC

  • Material Ledger - not distributed

    Dear All.
    After I run CKMLCP, I found that some value can't not distributed and it's stored in not distributed  category.
    I found an unnormal thing in sytem: When I run Settlement, CO88, some Production Order in previous month appear in current period, with a little variance. All of them are completed in previous month and I ran CO88 for them.
    Does anyknow why CKMLCP can't ditribute all producion variant to consumption and stock ? Pleas help me.
    Thanks and Best regard,
    QuangDD

    Hi,
    The production order even you settle at the previous month may consume some stock in the current period also.so that the settlemnt is considering that amount in the current month,so check whether the consumption is on which month by running consumption of production order in MB51 or production report.
    So it will lead unconsistency in CKMLCP run.so check with the prouction dept & correct the entry & take the CKMLCP run.
    Tell me one more thing the cost release is for monthly or periodically.
    Regards,
    Raj.

  • How can I prevent a PDF file from being copied, printed or downloaded? Students should only be able to view the text and and not distribute it in any way.

    How can I prevent a PDF file from being copied, printed or downloaded? Students should only be able to view the text and and not distribute it in any way.

    You can prevent it from being printed by applying a security policy to it
    in Acrobat. The rest can't be prevented, unless you spend  a LOT of money
    on DRM protection.

  • SAP Production Order not closing

    Hi there,
    I am running the COHV with Complete parameter in the background, and it does pick up several TECO orders from the past, like say from 2009 which are not closed but it does not process them to CLSD status.
    I am seeing some entries in COHV, CO1P, COFC transactions - I picked a few randomly to check.
    The order qty is not always equal to the delivered qty - Again a random test
    The consumption qty on the components is not always equal to the required qty, which leaves reservation open - random check
    Is all the above causing my order not to close ? where do I see the error log, when I try to close the order. I wrote the above issues based on my random check.
    Thank you

    Hi SAP Process,
    When you run COHV to close the orders, you can see the log with the list of orders that have not been closed.
    To see in detail what has happened you will need to check order by order.
    Other option will we to evaluate each situation separatelly. You can check COGI, CO1P, see open reservations, check if you have TR or TO if you use WM, etc.. Once each situation is cleaned, you will be able to closed most of your production orders. It is quite common to create a custom report to make all these checks (COGI, TR/TOs, etc) and closed the orders.
    Kind Regards,
    Mariano

  • Open Purchase Orders not considered as requirement for MRP Run

    Hi ,
    We are facing a issue of Open Purchase orders not appeared in Stock requirements list and also it is not considered as requirement for MRP Run against reservation.
    As aresult for a reservation demand of 10 units we are ending with Open POs 10 units and a additional planned order 10 units.
    Material Type : ERSA
    MRP Type : PD (or VB)
    Lot size : EX (  HB if MRP Type is VB)
    Could you please throw some light to correct our settings to MRP to consider Open POs?
    Saravanan

    Can you check to see if there is a re-order point set up for this materia? That could be causing the problem too.

  • Planned order not getting generated for FG

    Dear Experts,
    Planned orders not getting generated for the Finished Goods - X which is having MRP Type M0 - MPS fixing type strategy group 20 which is copied fron another FG - Y , its a new product and production plan has been updated through MC88 - Rough cut planning but the planned orders are not getting generated.
    And for the material valid production version exists with selection method 3 and individullcollective as 1.
    Please let me know what might be the possibalities and what all the key fields i need to check.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sampath
    Edited by: sampath s on Jul 13, 2011 11:31 AM

    Dear,
    In general MPS is run for High value items ( if you use like Gold , Platimum or A class items. ).
    Always only single level is used for Explosion and planning. then only you can analyse the requirements at each stage before procurement.
    Otherwise if you run MPS to multi level, Bottom most high value will be procured without any notice to authorities. Even you may cancel the process in mid way. At that time what will happen to the procured high value material.
    So for that purpose only single item single level MPS concept is evolved.
    Fo that you run MPS at single level so that only for the first level MPS will be carried out.
    Check and revert back.\
    Regards,
    Alok Tiwari

  • How to program a midi foot controller on Mainstage? Does anyone knows how to program the foot controller with exclusive solo channel in order not to dance "tip tap" while from clean guitar I go to crunch or solo? How to do this programming on Mainstage?

    How to program a midi foot controller on Mainstage? Does anyone knows how to program the foot controller with exclusive solo channel in order not to dance "tip tap" while from clean guitar I go to crunch or solo? How to do this programming on Mainstage?
    I basically managed to learn how to invert parameters which allows me to be as default in the clean guitar channel and if I switch the first button on the midi foot controller I switch to crunch, but at this point I tryied so hard to programm the second and third button to switch, only through a button in one step, to a third channel for distorsion or a 4th channel for solo guitar but I couldn't figured out how this work can be done!
    I would appreciate if anyone could help or share this experience with others who are experiencing the same problem.
    Cheers.
    F.

    I cannot seem to get mainstage to recognize my FCB either. I am using IFCB. Anyone figure this out?
    Thanks,
    Eric

  • PO-Freight cost (header, diff currency with items) not distributed when GR

    Dear Gurus,
    I've one PO with freight cost at header level (1000 VND). In the PO, this freight amount shown to be distributed successfully to line item (value base, line item 1 is 300 VND, line item 2 is 700 VND). But when doing GR, the freight cost of each line item is NOT distributed but equals the total freight amount (line item 1 is 1000 VND, line item 2 is 1000 VND).
    In this PO, vendor is international vendor, goods in USD. Freight cost is in local currency (VND)
    The configuration for this freight cost condition is at Header level, Group Condition ticked; Calculation type: Fixed Amount; Scale Basis: Value. When the currency of freight cost and goods are the same (all in USD), I have no error as above.
    Please help to solve this issue.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    I am facing the same problem in my client. It would be great if you can share how you resolved the issue of Freight Cost
    Regards
    Athar

  • Goods receipt  for purchase order not allowed for a particular wbs

    hello everybody..
    Am creating a good receipt for a purchase order using the T-CODE-: MIGO...
    While doing so am getting an error as " goods receipt  for purchase order not allowed(wbs element)".
    What can be done to rectify this error?
    Plz do help me....
    Regards,
    Deepika
    Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please have a look in the appropriate functional forum, study the long text of this error message.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Dec 1, 2010 5:52 PM

    Hi Br. Ajay M,
    Released the order and Status line as follow
    REL  AVAC BUDG GMPS
    but the error changed while reverse the document
    item 0001 Order is invalid.
    Many thanks for your kindly reply.
    regards,
    Steven

  • Copa document for free of charge orders not relevant for billing

    Hi all,
    when we create the shipment costs of the samples goods the systems give us this error: ME083 "Entre Profit. segment".
    The mistake is related to the missing profitability segment in the sales order of samples goods there are not valid for the billing.
    How can we generate a profitability segment for free of charge sales orders not relevant for the billings?
    The Item Category is not relevant for the billing and we can't modify it.
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards.
    Matteo

    Hi Sanil,
    unfortunatly we can't create the billing. Due to fiscal requirements only sales orders and delivery exist.
    We can't generate an invoice even with zero value.
    The SD item category is not relevant for billing, so in the sales order no profitability segment is generated.
    This is the standard functionalty of SAP, but we need to generate a profitability segment in the sales order because the shipment cost need it (transportation module of SAP).
    All the other SD flow (sales orders with invoices) run already well.
    Thanks
    Matteo

  • EBP Orders not reaching to SAP R/3

    Hi All,
    I have an issue, EBP Order not reaching to R/3, and showing PO status as Error .
    I have checked all assignments (cost centre, vendor) are ok,
    Can any one suggest what it may be the problem for this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Regards,
    Krish

    Hi Please check the following....
    1) As mentioned by other users see if RZ20 is still showing an error for this PO.
    2) If the error is old, try to change the description of the PO and order to re-generate the error.
    3) Error in process usually is due to diferences in the way SRM and R/3 works. All budgeting and accounting is maintained in R/3 so SRM might not properly display a hard stop for those errors until handled by custom code. Similarly some changes to PO are not accepted on the R/3 side after the receipts are entered.
    Hope this helps.

  • Receiving Services as Materials in order not to perform goods receipt

    I am on a project that is implementing SRM in May. The company has decided to upload 15 Vendors for Services and to perform the goods receipts in order to achieve a 3 way match. One of the Vendors (Huge Spend) will not get a goods receipt performed as no one wants to perform the goods receipt (this was just decided yesterday).  We will create the shopping cart and SRM PO and pay the invoices in R/3. In order to do this we have to enter the shopping cart as a material in order not to have a goods receipt performed in SRM (as I am told). Has anyone ever experienced this? Is there any problems that we, as a company, may not be aware of Is there someone out there that has experienced this or close to this? Please advise. Thanks

    Dear Kimberly
    In SRM every implementation requires a backend systems and in any of the Technical scenarios goods receipt can be done in any of the system either in SRM or in R/3.
    However we can resrrict the goods receipts not done in SRM by modifying the role in PFCG and remove Confirmation of goods/servies from the role.
    This will force the users to do goods receitps in R/3 systems only.
    The Leading Po can be created in any of system either in SRM or in R/3.
    regards,
    Nimish Sheth
    NB - Do rewards points for helpful answer.

  • Sales Order not Valid During Vendor Clearing

    Hi,
    When I'm clearing vendor open items (both normal & special GL transactions) i'm getting an error message "Sales Order not Valid". How do I correct this error?
    Thanks,
    Chaikaru

    Hi ,
    As you're saying that the order got saved already with confirmation, you can try re-doing the ATP check on the SO item. If the order item is not present in SCM, system will throw an error with the message "APO: Order Doesn't exist".
    You have mentioned that CCR did not detect the inconsistency, have you by any chance selected check box "use VBBE table"?
    You can try resending all the Sales Orders to SCM by running Initial Supply (report RIMODINI) for Sales Order Integration Model., monitor the queues in /SAPAPO/CQ. Alternatively, If you're using Inbound queues in SCM, you can only check SMQ2 in SCM and if you're using Outbound queues in ECC, check SMQ1 in ECC to monitor the queus.
    regards,
    Mohan

Maybe you are looking for